Effect of needle orientation during arteriovenous access puncture on needed compression time after hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are two techniques for puncturing an arteriovenous fistula: one where the needle is inserted bevel up and then rotated to a bevel down position, and another where the needle is inserted bevel down. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods of needle insertion on minimum compression time required for hemostasis after needle removal. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, cross-over, blinded, single-center, routine care study. Each patient's average post-dialysis puncture site compression time was determined during a 2-week baseline period while using bevel-up access puncture. Subsequently, minimum post-dialysis puncture-site compression time was determined during each of two sequential follow-up periods, during which fistula puncture was done with needles inserted bevel up or down, respectively. The order of treatments (bevel up or bevel down insertion) was randomized. During each follow-up period, the minimum compression time necessary to avoid bleeding on needle removal was determined by progressively shortening the compression time. Puncture-associated pain was also assessed as prepump and venous pressures and ability to achieve desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were recruited. The baseline compression time after needle removal averaged 9.99 ± 2.7 min During the intervention periods, the minimum compression time was on average 10.8 min (9.23-12.4) when the access needles had been inserted bevel down versus 11.1 min (9.61-12.5) when the access needles had been inserted bevel up (p = 0.72). There was no difference in puncture-associated pain between the two insertion techniques, and no difference in prepump or venous pressures or ability to achieve the desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session. CONCLUSION: Bevel-up and bevel-down needle orientation during arteriovenous fistula puncture are equivalent techniques in terms of achieving hemostasis on needle removal, and puncture-associated pain.

Novel Use of a Pneumatic Compression Device for Haemostasis of Haemodialysis Fistula Access Catheterisation Sites.

PURPOSE: Transradial pneumatic compression devices can be used to achieve haemostasis following radial artery puncture. This article describes a novel technique for acquiring haemostasis of arterio-venous haemodialysis fistula access sites without the need for suture placement using one such compression device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of fistulograms with or without angioplasty/thrombectomy in a single institution was performed. 20 procedures performed on 12 patients who underwent percutaneous intervention of failing or thrombosed arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) had 27 puncture sites. Haemostasis was achieved using a pneumatic compression device at all access sites. Procedure details including size of access sheath, heparin administration and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Two diagnostic fistulograms, 14 fistulograms and angioplasties and four thrombectomies were performed via access sheaths with an average size (±SD) of 6 Fr (±1.12). IV unfractionated heparin was administered in 11 of 20 procedures. Haemostasis was achieved in 26 of 27 access sites following 15-20 min of compression using the pneumatic compression device. One case experienced limited bleeding from an inflow access site that was successfully treated with reinflation of the device for a further 5 min. No other complication was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Haemostasis of arterio-venous haemodialysis fistula access sites can be safely and effectively achieved using a pneumatic compression device. This is a technically simple, safe and sutureless technique for acquiring haemostasis after AVF intervention.