Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.127
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 74(4): 341-358, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652221

RESUMO

The rising costs of cancer care and subsequent medical financial hardship for cancer survivors and families are well documented in the United States. Less attention has been paid to employment disruptions and loss of household income after a cancer diagnosis and during treatment, potentially resulting in lasting financial hardship, particularly for working-age adults not yet age-eligible for Medicare coverage and their families. In this article, the authors use a composite patient case to illustrate the adverse consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment for employment, health insurance coverage, household income, and other aspects of financial hardship. They summarize existing research and provide nationally representative estimates of multiple aspects of financial hardship and health insurance coverage, benefit design, and employee benefits, such as paid sick leave, among working-age adults with a history of cancer and compare them with estimates among working-age adults without a history of cancer from the most recently available years of the National Health Interview Survey (2019-2021). Then, the authors identify opportunities for addressing employment and health insurance coverage challenges at multiple levels, including federal, state, and local policies; employers; cancer care delivery organizations; and nonprofit organizations. These efforts, when informed by research to identify best practices, can potentially help mitigate the financial hardship associated with cancer.


Assuntos
Emprego , Estresse Financeiro , Cobertura do Seguro , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Masculino , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 72(6): 542-560, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35829644

RESUMO

Previous studies using data from the early 2000s demonstrated that patients who were uninsured were more likely to present with late-stage disease and had worse short-term survival after cancer diagnosis in the United States. In this report, the authors provide comprehensive data on the associations of health insurance coverage type with stage at diagnosis and long-term survival in individuals aged 18-64 years who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 with 19 common cancers from the National Cancer Database, with survival follow-up through December 31, 2019. Compared with privately insured patients, Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage (III/IV) cancer for all stageable cancers combined and separately. For all stageable cancers combined and for six cancer sites-prostate, colorectal, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, oral cavity, liver, and esophagus-uninsured patients with Stage I disease had worse survival than privately insured patients with Stage II disease. Patients without private insurance coverage had worse short-term and long-term survival at each stage for all cancers combined; patients who were uninsured had worse stage-specific survival for 12 of 17 stageable cancers and had worse survival for leukemia and brain tumors. Expanding access to comprehensive health insurance coverage is crucial for improving access to cancer care and outcomes, including stage at diagnosis and survival.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Medicaid
3.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 70(3): 165-181, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202312

RESUMO

Lack of health insurance coverage is strongly associated with poor cancer outcomes in the United States. The uninsured are less likely to have access to timely and effective cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care than their counterparts with health insurance coverage. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law, representing the largest change to health care delivery in the United States since the introduction of the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 1965. The primary goals of the ACA are to improve health insurance coverage, the quality of care, and patient outcomes, and to maintain or lower costs by catalyzing changes in the health care delivery system. In this review, we describe the main components of the ACA, including health insurance expansions, coverage reforms, and delivery system reforms, provisions within these components, and their relevance to cancer screening and early detection, care, and outcomes. We then highlight selected, well-designed studies examining the effects of the ACA provisions on coverage, access to cancer care, and disparities throughout the cancer control continuum. Finally, we identify research gaps to inform evaluation of current and emerging health policies related to cancer outcomes.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Neoplasias/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Morbidade/tendências , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 69(6): 485-496, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31594027

RESUMO

There are nearly 70,000 new cancer diagnoses made annually in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in the United States. Historically, AYA patients with cancer, aged 15 to 39 years, have not shown the same improved survival as older or younger cohorts. This article reviews the contemporary cancer incidence and survival data through 2015 for the AYA patient population based on the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry program and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data through 2016 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics are also described. Encouragingly, absolute and relative increases in 5-year survival for AYA cancers have paralleled those of childhood cancers since the year 2000. There has been increasing attention to these vulnerable patients and improved partnerships and collaboration between adult and pediatric oncology; however, obstacles to the care of this population still occur at multiple levels. These vulnerabilities fall into 3 significant categories: research efforts and trial enrollment directed toward AYA malignancies, access to care and insurance coverage, and AYA-specific psychosocial support. It is critical for providers and health care delivery systems to recognize that the AYA population remains vulnerable to provider and societal complacency.


Assuntos
Oncologia/tendências , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Humanos , Incidência , Oncologia/métodos , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Programa de SEER , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 69(3): 166-183, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30786025

RESUMO

Between 1991 and 2015, the cancer mortality rate declined dramatically in the United States, reflecting improvements in cancer prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship care. However, cancer outcomes in the United States vary substantially between populations defined by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and geographic area of residence. Many potentially preventable cancer deaths occur in individuals who did not receive effective cancer prevention, screening, treatment, or survivorship care. At the same time, cancer care spending is large and growing, straining national, state, health insurance plans, and family budgets. Indeed, one of the most pressing issues in American medicine is how to ensure that all populations, in every community, derive the benefit from scientific research that has already been completed. Addressing these questions from the perspective of health care delivery is necessary to accelerate the decline in cancer mortality that began in the early 1990s. This article, part of the Cancer Control Blueprint series, describes challenges with the provision of care across the cancer control continuum in the United States. It also identifies goals for a high-performing health system that could reduce disparities and the burden of cancer by promoting the adoption of healthy lifestyles; access to a regular source of primary care; timely access to evidence-based care; patient-centeredness, including effective patient-provider communication; enhanced coordination and communication between providers, including primary care and specialty care providers; and affordability for patients, payers, and society.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Objetivos , Equidade em Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Equidade em Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 120(18): e2222100120, 2023 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37094163

RESUMO

Health insurance coverage in the United States is highly uncertain. In the post-Affordable Care Act (ACA), pre-COVID United States, we estimate that while 12.5% of individuals under 65 are uninsured at a point in time, twice as many-one in four-are uninsured at some point over a 2-y period. Moreover, the risk of losing insurance remained virtually unchanged with the introduction of the landmark ACA. Risk of insurance loss is particularly high for those with health insurance through Medicaid or private exchanges; they have a 20% chance of losing coverage at some point over a 2-y period, compared to 8.5% for those with employer-provided coverage. Those who lose insurance can experience prolonged periods without coverage; about half are still uninsured 6 mo later, and almost one-quarter are uninsured for the subsequent 2 y. These facts suggest that research and policy attention should focus not only on the "headline number" of the share of the population uninsured at a point in time, but also on the stability and certainty (or lack thereof) of being insured.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Medicaid
7.
Am J Epidemiol ; 2024 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39049439

RESUMO

The United States (US) has witnessed a notable increase in socioeconomic disparities in all-cause mortality since 2000. While this period is marked by significant macroeconomic and health policy changes, the specific drivers of these mortality trends remain poorly understood. In this study, we assessed healthcare access variables and their association with socioeconomic status (SES)-related differences (exposure) in US all-cause mortality (outcome), since 2000. Our research drew upon cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, 2000-2018), linked to death records from the National Death Index (NDI, 2000-2019) (n=486,257). The findings reveal that the odds of a lack of health insurance and unaffordability of needed medical care were over two-fold higher among individuals with lower education, compared to those with high education, following differential time trends. Moreover, elevated mortality risk was associated with lower education (up to 77%), uninsurance (17%), unaffordability (43%), and delayed care (12%). Uninsurance and unaffordability accounted for 4-6% of the disparities in time to mortality between low- and high-education groups. These findings were corroborated by income-based sensitivity analyses, emphasizing that inadequate healthcare access partially contributed to socioeconomic disparities in mortality. Effective policies promoting equitable healthcare access are imperative to mitigate socioeconomic disparities in mortality.

8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 193(7): 951-958, 2024 07 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400644

RESUMO

In 2008, Oregon expanded its Medicaid program using a lottery, creating a rare opportunity to study the effects of Medicaid coverage using a randomized controlled design (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment). Analysis showed that Medicaid coverage lowered the risk of depression. However, this effect may vary between individuals, and the identification of individuals likely to benefit the most has the potential to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Medicaid program. By applying the machine learning causal forest to data from this experiment, we found substantial heterogeneity in the effect of Medicaid coverage on depression; individuals with high predicted benefit were older and had more physical or mental health conditions at baseline. Expanding coverage to individuals with high predicted benefit generated greater reduction in depression prevalence than expanding to all eligible individuals (21.5 vs 8.8 percentage-point reduction; adjusted difference = +12.7 [95% CI, +4.6 to +20.8]; P = 0.003), at substantially lower cost per case prevented ($16 627 vs $36 048; adjusted difference = -$18 598 [95% CI, -156 953 to -3120]; P = 0.04). Medicaid coverage reduces depression substantially more in a subset of the population than others, in ways that are predictable in advance. Targeting coverage on those most likely to benefit could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of insurance expansion. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.


Assuntos
Depressão , Cobertura do Seguro , Aprendizado de Máquina , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Oregon , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
9.
Cancer ; 2024 Jul 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39017818

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study examines patients' understanding of health insurance terms and concepts and quantifies health insurance literacy (HIL) levels by key sociodemographic factors. METHODS: This study included 393 adult patients with cancer (>18 years old) receiving treatment in two ambulatory infusion centers: Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona and the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Mississippi. Respondents' perceptions of their HIL were assessed using the Health Insurance Literacy Measure (HILM), a validated 21-item measure of a consumer's ability to select and use health insurance (HIL self-efficacy). Respondents' knowledge of health insurance concepts (HIL knowledge) was measured using 10 items created by the Kaiser Family Foundation. The number of correct answers was categorized into three levels: 0-4 (low knowledge), 5-6 (moderate knowledge), and 7-10 (high knowledge). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare correct answers to HIL knowledge questions by HIL self-efficacy. RESULTS: Nearly three-quarters of patients had high HIL self-efficacy and high HIL knowledge (70.5%), understanding basic insurance terms, such as premiums and deductibles. Relatively low percentages of patients correctly answered questions about the meaning of provider networks, health insurance formularies, and calculating out-of-pocket spending in scenarios when insurers pay a portion of allowed charges. Lower HIL knowledge was more common among patients with less educational attainment (

10.
Cancer ; 130(9): 1609-1617, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urologists practicing in single-specialty groups with ownership in radiation vaults are more likely to treat men with prostate cancer. The effect of divestment of vault ownership on treatment patterns is unclear. METHODS: A 20% sample of national Medicare claims was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of men with prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. Urology practices were categorized by radiation vault ownership as nonowners, continuous owners, and divested owners. The primary outcome was use of local treatment, and the secondary outcome was use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A difference-in-differences framework was used to measure the effect of divestment on outcomes compared to continuous owners. Subgroup analyses assessed outcomes by noncancer mortality risk (high [>50%] vs. low [≤50%]). RESULTS: Among 72 urology practices that owned radiation vaults, six divested during the study. Divestment led to a decrease in treatment compared with those managed at continuously owning practices (difference-in-differences estimate, -13%; p = .03). The use of IMRT decreased, but this was not statistically significant (difference-in-differences estimate, -10%; p = .13). In men with a high noncancer mortality risk, treatment (difference-in-differences estimate, -28%; p < .001) and use of IMRT (difference-in-differences estimate, -27%; p < .001) decreased after divestment. CONCLUSIONS: Urology group divestment from radiation vault ownership led to a decrease in prostate cancer treatment. This decrease was most pronounced in men who had a high noncancer mortality risk. This has important implications for health care reform by suggesting that payment programs that encourage constraints on utilization, when appropriate, may be effective in reducing overtreatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Urologistas , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Propriedade , Medicare , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(6): 955-961, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388859

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients often face substantial financial burden due to prolonged and expensive therapy. However, in-depth experiences of financial burden among MBC patients are not well understood. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted to describe the experiences of financial burden for MBC patients, focusing on the drivers of financial burden, their experience using their health insurance, accessing financial assistance, and any resulting cost-coping behaviors. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using a descriptive phenomenological approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of n = 11 MBC patients or caregiver representatives participated in the study. MBC patients were on average 50.2 years of age (range: 28-65) and 72.7% non-Hispanic White. MBC patients were diagnosed as metastatic an average of 3.1 years (range: 1-9) before participating in the study. Qualitative analysis resulted in four themes including (1) causes of financial burden, (2) financial assistance mechanisms, (3) health insurance and financial burden, and (4) cost-coping behaviors. Both medical and non-medical costs drove financial burden among participants. All participants reported challenges navigating their health insurance and applying for financial assistance. Regardless of gaining access to assistance, financial burden persisted for nearly all patients and resulted in cost-coping behaviors. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that current systems for health insurance and financial assistance are complex and difficult to meet patient needs. Even when MBC patients accessed assistance, excess financial burden persisted necessitating use of financial coping-behaviors such as altering medication use, maintaining employment, and taking on debt.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Neoplasias da Mama , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Seguro Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Idoso , Metástase Neoplásica , Capacidades de Enfrentamento
12.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(2): 335-345, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737304

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC-related mortality among young adults (< 50 years) has been on the rise. The American Cancer Society (ACS) reduced the CRC screening age to 45 in 2018. Few studies have examined the barriers to CRC screening among young adults. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using data from 7,505 adults aged 45-75 years who completed the 2018 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. We examined the sociodemographic characteristics associated with CRC screening overall and by age group using separate multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: 76% of eligible adults had received screening for CRC. Increasing age, Black racial group [OR 1.45; 95% CI (1.07, 1.97)], having some college experience, a college degree or higher [OR 1.69; 95% CI (1.24, 2.29)], health insurance coverage [OR 4.48; 95% CI (2.96, 6.76)], primary care provider access [OR 2.48; 95% CI (1.91, 3.22)] and presence of a comorbid illness [OR 1.39; 95% CI (1.12, 1.73)] were independent predictors of CRC screening. Current smokers were less likely to undergo CRC screening [OR 0.59; 95% CI (0.40, 0.87)]. Among adults aged 50-64 years, being of Hispanic origin [OR 0.60; 95% CI (0.39, 0.92)] was associated with a lower likelihood of CRC screening. CONCLUSION: CRC screening rates among adults 45-49 years are low but are increasing steadily. Odds of CRC screening among Blacks is high which is encouraging while the odds among current smokers is low and concerning given their increased risk of developing CRC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Programas de Rastreamento , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Hispânico ou Latino , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121462

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) required a shared decision-making (SDM) interaction, with an "independent" physician, before left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The purpose of this study is to better understand how this requirement is implemented in clinical practice. METHODS: We surveyed LAAC-performing centers. The characteristics of respondent and nonrespondent hospitals were compared using the CMS Provider of Services File for 2017. RESULTS: We received 86 responses out of 269 surveys mailed (32%). Respondent and nonrespondent hospital affiliations were similar: mean hospital size 525 beds, 15% for-profit, and 34% teaching hospitals. Thirty-four respondents (39.5%) stated that the implanting physician conducts some or all of the SDM interactions. The percentage of patients who decide not to undergo LAAC after the SDM interaction was estimated at 8.1%. Out of 72 responses to an open-ended question about the benefit of the SDM interaction, 44 (61%) described the requirement in negative terms, of which most felt the requirement was burdensome for patients and providers. Only 28 respondents (39%) described the requirement in positive or mixed terms. CONCLUSION: In violation of the letter of the CMS policy for LAAC, implanting physicians perform the SDM interaction at nearly 40% of responding hospitals. Most respondents felt the SDM requirement was burdensome for patients. More detailed guidance from CMS on how to comply with the policy may result in better alignment between the intent of the policy and how it is implemented.

14.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(5): 805-818, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267664

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Fracture risk assessment is recommended at three months after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy initiation. This study aimed to assess whether GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy is associated with subsequent hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk using the nationwide health insurance claims database of Japan (NDBJ). METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 50 years who were prescribed GC (≥ 70 mg prednisolone or equivalent; PSL) in the initial 90 days of GC therapy and were followed for hip and clinical vertebral fracture incidences for the subsequent 1080 days were selected from NDBJ. Associations of GC exposure with hip or clinical vertebral fracture risk were evaluated by Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: We selected 316,396 women and 299,871 men for the GC-exposed group and 43,164 women and 33,702 men for the reference group. Higher GC doses and longer prescription days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy were significantly and dose-dependently associated with increased fracture risk relative to the reference group. Patients receiving GC ≥ 5 mg PSL/day had a significantly increased fracture risk in the stratum of 30-59 days of GC prescription. In addition, female patients who received GC (≥ 1 and < 2.5 mg PSL/day) for 90 days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy had a significantly increased fracture risk. CONCLUSIONS: GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy was dose-dependently associated with hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk. GC may increase fracture risk with lower doses for shorter durations than previously reported. Fracture risk assessment three months after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy initiation is recommended. We found that GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy at lower daily doses for shorter durations than previously reported were significantly and dose-dependently associated with fracture risk using a nationwide health insurance claims database.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Fraturas do Quadril , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Japão/epidemiologia , Seguro Saúde , Fraturas do Quadril/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
15.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 95, 2024 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383463

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) were reported to have a high mortality rate; however, this was based on data from the early stages of the pandemic. It is uncertain how their mortality rates have changed with the emergence of new variants of concern as well as the development of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. It is also unclear whether having ILD still poses a risk factor for mortality. As COVID-19 continues to be a major concern, further research on COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD is necessary. METHODS: We extracted data on COVID-19 patients between January 2020-August 2021 from a Japanese nationwide insurance claims database and divided them into those with and without preexisting ILD. We investigated all-cause mortality of COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD in wild-type-, alpha-, and delta-predominant waves, to determine whether preexisting ILD was associated with increased mortality. RESULTS: Of the 937,758 adult COVID-19 patients, 7,333 (0.8%) had preexisting ILD. The proportion of all COVID-19 patients who had preexisting ILD in the wild-type-, alpha-, and delta-predominant waves was 1.2%, 0.8%, and 0.3%, respectively, and their 60-day mortality was 16.0%, 14.6%, and 7.5%, respectively. The 60-day mortality significantly decreased from the alpha-predominant to delta-predominant waves (difference - 7.1%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) - 9.3% to - 4.9%). In multivariable analysis, preexisting ILD was independently associated with increased mortality in all waves with the wild-type-predominant, odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% CI 1.91-2.30, the alpha-predominant wave, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.84-2.50, and the delta-predominant wave, OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.66-2.66. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality rates for COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD decreased from the wild-type- to the more recent delta-predominant waves. However, these patients were consistently at higher mortality risk than those without preexisting ILD. We emphasize that careful attention should be given to patients with preexisting ILD despite the change in the COVID-19 environment.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adulto , Humanos , Pandemias , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/epidemiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2024 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2019, New York City (NYC) launched NYC Care (NYCC), a healthcare access program through NYC Health + Hospitals (H + H) for individuals who are ineligible for federally funded health insurance programs or cannot purchase insurance through the State Marketplace, predominantly undocumented individuals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare use patterns, and chronic disease quality measures for diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension among NYCC patients compared with Medicaid patients seen at NYC H + H. DESIGN: Observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18 years and older enrolled in NYCC (N = 83,003) or Medicaid (N = 512,012) as of January 1, 2022. Patients were included if they had at least one visit between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. MAIN MEASURES: Sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare use patterns, and quality measures for DM and hypertension. KEY RESULTS: NYCC patients (n = 83,003) were, on average, older, more likely to be Hispanic with Spanish as their preferred language, had more comorbidities, and had more primary care (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.75 [95% confidence interval 2.71, 2.80]) and specialty care (2.22 [2.17, 2.26]) visits compared to Medicaid patients (n = 512,012). Rates of emergency department visits were similar between the two groups (1.02 [1.00, 1.04]), but NYCC patients had relatively fewer hospitalizations (0.64 [0.62, 0.67]). NYCC patients with DM or hypertension had higher rates of having a documented hemoglobin A1c or blood pressure in 2022, respectively, and clinically similar rates of chronic disease control (mean difference in hemoglobin A1c - 0.05 [- 0.09, - 0.01] in patients with DM and mean difference in blood pressure - 0.38 [- 0.67, - 0.10]/ - 0.64 [- 0.82, - 0.46]) compared with Medicaid patients. CONCLUSIONS: NYCC effectively enrolled a large number of uninsured participants and provided them with healthcare access similar to that of Medicaid patients. Future studies should evaluate the impact of NYCC enrollment on healthcare utilization and disease outcomes.

17.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2024 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103604

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Incarceration can result in adverse socioeconomic and health consequences for individuals who have been incarcerated; these consequences extend to their children and may have impacts into later adulthood. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of family member incarceration (FMI) during childhood and smoking and unhealthy drinking behaviors, access to care, and functional status in later adulthood. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18-64 and ≥ 65 with and without FMI during childhood from 42 states and Washington DC from the 2019-2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MAIN MEASURES: Having FMI history was defined as "living with anyone during childhood who served time or was sentenced to serve time in a prison, jail, or other correctional facility." Study outcomes included 1) smoking and unhealthy drinking behaviors, 2) access to care (health insurance coverage, care affordability, having a usual source of care, and use of preventive services), and 3) functional status (e.g., having difficulty walking or climbing stairs). KEY RESULTS: After adjusting for demographic characteristics and other adverse childhood experiences, compared to adults without FMI, adults aged 18-64 with FMI were more likely to report any history of smoking or unhealthy drinking (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.28), any access to care problems (AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.12-1.42), and any functional limitations (AOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10-1.28); adults aged ≥ 65 with FMI reported higher likelihood of reporting any smoking or unhealthy drinking behaviors (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.43) and impaired functional status (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10-1.54). Associations were attenuated after additional adjustment for socioeconomic measures, especially educational attainment, but remained statically significant for multiple outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: FMI during childhood was associated with adverse health-related outcomes for adults of all ages. Developing programs to improve access to education and economic opportunities for adults with FMI may help mitigate the disparities.

18.
Neuroepidemiology ; 58(1): 37-46, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992696

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Acute facial palsy, characterized by sudden hemifacial weakness, significantly impacts an individual's quality of life. Despite several predisposing factors identified for acute facial palsy, the specific relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute facial palsy has not been comprehensively explored in recent studies. The aim of the study was to assess the risk of acute facial palsy in patients with DM using a nationwide population sample cohort. METHODS: DM cohort and non-DM cohort were built using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Sample Cohort which represents the entire population of the Republic of Korea from January 2002 to December 2019. The DM cohort comprised 92,872 patients with a record of medication and a diagnosis of DM. Individuals who had facial palsy before the diagnosis of DM were excluded. A comparison cohort comprised 1,012,021 individuals without DM matched sociodemographically in a 1:4 ratio. The incidence of Bell's palsy (BP) and Ramsay Hunt syndrome (RHS) were evaluated in both cohorts. The risk factors for acute facial palsy were also assessed. RESULTS: Among the 92,868 patients in the DM cohort, the incidence rate (IR) of BP and RHS were 31.42 (confidence interval [CI], 30.24-32.63) and 4.58 per 10,000 person-years (CI, 4.14-5.05), respectively. Among the 371,392 individuals in the non-DM cohort, the IR of BP was 22.11 per 10,000 person-years (CI, 21.62-22.59) and the IR of RHS was 2.85 per 10,000 person-years (CI, 2.68-3.02). IR ratios for BP and RHS were 1.42 (CI, 1.36-1.48) and 1.61 (CI, 1.43-1.80). In multivariate analysis, DM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.428), age (HR 1.008), and high comorbidity score (HR 1.051) were associated with increased risk of BP, and male (HR 0.803) and living in metropolis (HR 0.966) decreased the risk of BP. And DM (HR 1.615), high comorbidity score (HR 1.078), and living in metropolis (HR 1.201) were associated with increased risk for RHS. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with DM had an increased risk of acute facial palsy including BP and RHS.


Assuntos
Paralisia de Bell , Diabetes Mellitus , Paralisia Facial , Herpes Zoster da Orelha Externa , Humanos , Masculino , Paralisia Facial/epidemiologia , Paralisia Facial/complicações , Paralisia de Bell/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Herpes Zoster da Orelha Externa/complicações , Herpes Zoster da Orelha Externa/diagnóstico
19.
Pharmacol Res ; 199: 107036, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38096958

RESUMO

Because genetic alterations including mutations, overexpression, translocations, and dysregulation of protein kinases are involved in the pathogenesis of many illnesses, this enzyme family is the target of many drug discovery programs worldwide. The FDA has approved 80 small molecule protein kinase inhibitors with 77 drugs orally bioavailable. The data indicate that 69 of these medicinals are approved for the management of neoplasms including solid tumors such as breast and lung cancer as well as non-solid tumors such as leukemia. Moreover, the remaining 11 drugs target non-neoplastic diseases including psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis. The cost of drugs was obtained from www.pharmacychecker.com using the FDA label to determine the dosage and number of tablets required per day. This methodology excludes any private or governmental insurance coverage, which would cover the entire cost or more likely a fraction of the stated price. The average monthly cost for the treatment of neoplastic diseases was $17,900 with a price of $44,000 for futibatinib (used to treat cholangiocarcinomas with FGFR2 fusions) and minimum of $5100 for binimetinib (melanoma). The average monthly cost for the treatment of non-neoplastic diseases was $6800 with a maximum of $17,000 for belumosudil (graft vs. host disease) and a minimum of $200 for netarsudil eye drops (glaucoma). There is a negative correlation of the cost of the drugs and the incidence of the targeted disease. Many of these agents are or were designated as orphan drugs meaning that there are fewer than 200,000 potential patients in the United States.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/metabolismo
20.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 126, 2024 Mar 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460003

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To explore the association between chronic prostatitis (CP) and the subsequent development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Data analyzed were medical claims of Taiwan's National Health Insurance program. From 2010 to 2017, 3571 patients ≧20 years with CP diagnosed by certified urologists were enrolled. Patients with past BPH diagnosis and diagnosis of prostate cancer, inguinal hernia, interstitial cystitis, and urethritis in the past and within one year after the first CP diagnosis were excluded. Age-matched controls were randomly selected from all non-CP individuals of the same exclusion criteria in the study period with a CP/non-CP ratio of 1:4. The follow-up was made from the first CP diagnosis to death or the end of 2018. The endpoint was the newly diagnosed BPH. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of BPH in association with CP. RESULTS: Over a maximum of 8 years of follow-up, 287 (8.03%) and 258 (0.43%) BPH events were noted for the CP and non-CP group, respectively, representing a covariate adjusted HR (aHR) of 4.30 (95% CI, 3.61-5.13). Younger patients tended to suffer from higher aHRs, especially those aged 20-39 years (aHR: 11.45, 95% CI, 5.12-25.64). CONCLUSION: The Taiwan national health database indicated that CP patients had a significantly higher risk of developing BPH later than non-CP patients. Interestingly, the younger the CP is diagnosed (under 40), the greater the risk.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática , Neoplasias da Próstata , Prostatite , Masculino , Humanos , Prostatite/complicações , Prostatite/epidemiologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Doença Crônica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA