Persistent increase of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 with an unknown reason: A seven-year follow-up case.

BACKGROUND: We described a patient who exhibited a gradual increase in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) concentrations for 4 years at three hospitals, with no associated clinical manifestations; however, we were unable to define the cause of this increase, forcing us to consider whether it was a false-positive result. METHODS: Given the potential for interference, this study used multiple system detection, gradient dilution, Polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and heterophilic antibody blocking assay to evaluate the reliability of CA19-9 concentration increase. RESULTS: Analysis of the patient sample using multiple systems indicated that CA19-9 concentrations showed an obvious increase (154.0, and 889.2 IU/ml, respectively) using the Cobas E602 and Advia Centaur XP systems, and were within the reference ranges (<10 IU/ml) on other modules. PEG precipitation on the Cobas E602 and Advia Centaur XP systems reduced the CA19-9 concentration, as did heterophilic blocking tube (HBT-6, HBT-1) blockade. CONCLUSION: CA19-9 was incorrectly identified to increase due to the presence of heterophilic antibodies. We recommend that heterophilic antibodies should be evaluated in cases with elevated CA19-9 level but no associated clinical manifestations to prevent false positives.

False Positives in Thyroglobulin Determinations Due to the Presence of Heterophile Antibodies: An Underrecognized and Consequential Clinical Problem.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case series of thyroid cancer patients in whom false positive results in immunometric assays for thyroglobulin (TgIMA) were caused by heterophilic antibody interference, describe the clinical scenario in which this interference should be suspected, and recommend methods to demonstrate the interference. METHODS: Three patients with unexpectedly elevated thyroglobulin results (range, 1.6-75 ng/mL) were studied. In the first patient, thyroglobulin was elevated despite the presence of Tg antibody. In the second patient, suppressed thyroglobulin was higher than a recent stimulated thyroglobulin. In the third patient, thyroglobulin became detectable years after treatment and did not change after thyroid-stimulating hormone stimulation. TgIMA concentration determination was compared to determination by a mass spectrometry method (TgMS). Thyroglobulin was also remeasured after preabsorption with heterophile antibody blocking reagents and after serial dilutions. RESULTS: In all cases, thyroglobulin was undetectable by TgMS. In 2 of 3 patients, dilutions provided nonlinear thyroglobulin results. After blocking agent preabsorption, thyroglobulin dropped by 35%, 45%, and 91% in the 3 samples. CONCLUSION: False positive thyroglobulin concentrations from heterophilic antibody interference have significant impact on the management of thyroid cancer. Here we show that TgMS assays can be used to rule out heterophilic antibody interference. This interference should be suspected when a detectable thyroglobulin by TgIMA does not respond to thyroid-stimulating hormone or is discordant from the clinical assessment.

Identification of and solution for false D-dimer results.

BACKGROUND: Clinically, D-dimer (DD) levels are mainly used to exclude diseases such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In clinical testing, DD assays can be subjected to interference that may cause false results, which directly affect the clinical diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the fibrin degradation product (FDP)/DD and fibrinogen (Fib)/DD ratios were used to identify these false results and corrected via multiple dilutions. METHODS: In total, 16 776 samples were divided into three groups according to the DD levels detected by Sysmex CS5100 and CA7000: Group A, DD ≥ 2.0 µg/mL fibrinogen equivalent unit (FEU); group B, 0.5 < DD < 2.0 µg/mL FEU; and group C, DD ≤ 0.5 µg/mL FEU. The 95% CIs of the FDP/DD and Fib/DD ratios were calculated. Six abnormal DD results were found according to the 95% CIs. For verification, we performed multiple dilutions, compared the results with those of other instruments, and tested the addition of heterophilic blocking reagent (HBR). RESULTS: The median and 95% CI of the FDP/DD ratio were 3.76 and 2.25-8.15 in group A, 5.63 and 2.86-10.58 in group B, 10.23 and 0.91-47.71 in groups C, respectively. For the Fib/DD ratio, the 95% CIs was 0.02-2.21 in group A, 0.68-8.15 in group B, and 3.82-55.27 in groups C. Six abnormal results were identified after multiple dilutions, by comparison with other detection systems, and after HBR addition. CONCLUSIONS: The FDP/DD ratio is more reliable for identifying false results. If the FDP/DD ratio falls outside the 95% CI, it should be verified by different methods.

Falsely elevated plasma ACTH levels measured by the Elecsys assay related to heterophilic antibody in a case of secondary adrenocortical insufficiency.

A 49-year-old woman with membranous nephropathy was referred to our hospital during the tapering of oral prednisolone, because of suspicion of primary adrenal insufficiency based on a plasma ACTH level of 399.1 pg/mL in the Elecsys assay and a serum cortisol level of 3.1 µg/dL. A rapid ACTH stimulation test revealed a suboptimal response, whereas a prolonged ACTH simulation test showed a sufficient increase in her urinary free cortisol. Also, big ACTH was not detected by gel exclusion chromatography. Therefore, we speculated that ACTH levels were falsely elevated due to some interference substances. Pretreatment of her plasma with either polyethylene glycol precipitation or a heterophilic blocking tube substantially reduced her ACTH values. When either the Immulite ACTH II or the TOSOH II ACTH was tried instead of the Elecsys ACTH, her plasma ACTH values turned out to be lower and appropriate for her clinical status. These results indicated that heterophilic antibodies interfered only with the Elecsys ACTH assay presumably by bridging the capture and tracer antibodies. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which the Elecsys ACTH assay yielded falsely elevated results. Regardless of the measurement system used, if there is a discordance between assay results and clinical findings, it should be considered to adopt additional procedures and/or another assay.

What makes D-dimer assays suspicious-heterophilic antibodies?

BACKGROUND: Heterophilic antibodies are still an important source of interference in immunoassays, but reports of interference with D-dimers are rare. Are D-dimer level abnormalities, found in the clinic, caused by heterophilic antibodies as well, or are other mechanisms involved? We will elaborate on this issue through two different examples in this article. METHODS: Serum from two patients with significantly elevated levels of D-dimers were measured and compared by different methods, diluted, and dealt with heterophilic antibody blockers. At the same time, to retrieve the interference, we focused on the cause of D-dimer false positives and made a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The D-dimer values were normal (0.49 and 0.15 µg/mL) detected with different testing method and decreased after addition of heterophilic antibody blocking reagent. According to literature data, there were 66.7% (4/6) references showed the interference were heterophilic antibody. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of heterophilic antibodies on the measurement of D-dimers remains a big challenge. Different measuring instruments and methods may have significant differences in the measurement of D-dimers. By using a combination of instrumental methods for measuring, incorporating heterophilic antibody blockers, and combining with clinical performance and imaging data, most of the interference can be eliminated.

[False Elevation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Caused by Heterophilic Antibody Interference after Radical Prostatectomy : A Case Report].

We described a 63-year-old man who was diagnosed with clinical T1c prostate cancer, with a Gleason score of 6 (3＋3), and a preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 5. 27 ng/ml. Radical prostatectomy(RP) was performed and final pathologyshowed Gleason score 3＋4, pT2c with negative surgical margin. In spite of suggested surgical radicality, PSA was 3.32, 4.78, 5.93 ng/ml, at 1, 2, and 3 months after RP, respectively. However, radiological investigation revealed no metastasis. Because of this clinical discrepancy, we checked the PSA-α1-antichemotrypsin level and found it to be ≦0.1 ng/ml. From these results, false PSA elevation caused byinterference of positive heterophilic antibodies was suggested and demonstrated byseveral immunoassays.

Heterophilic antibody interference affecting multiple hormone assays: Is it due to rheumatoid factor?

Assay interference with heterophilic antibodies has been well described in literature. Rheumatoid factor is known to cause similar interference leading to falsely elevated hormone levels when measured by immunometric methods like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or multiplex immunoasays (MIA). We report a case of a 60-year-old male patient with a history of rheumatoid arthritis referred to our endocrine clinic for investigation of hypogonadism and was found to have high serum levels of LH, FSH, SHBG, Prolactin, HCG and TSH. We suspected assay interference and further tests were performed. We used Heteroblock tubes and PEG precipitation to eliminate the interference and the hormone levels post treatment were in the normal range. We believe the interference was caused by high serum levels of rheumatoid factor. Although he was treated with thyroxine for 3 years, we believe he may have been treated inappropriately as his Free T4 level was always normal despite high TSH due to assay interference. Our case illustrates the phenomenon of heterophilic antibody interference likely due to high levels of rheumatoid factor. It is essential for clinicians and endocrinologists in particular to be aware of this possibility when making treatment decisions in these groups of patients.

A phantom human chorionic gonadotropin in the case of molar pregnancy.

Accurately interpreting persistent, low human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels is essential for managing gestational trophoblastic disease. Erroneous interpretation can lead to inappropriate interventions, including unnecessary chemotherapy or hysterectomy, or unjustified changes in chemotherapeutic regimens due to misidentification of a false-positive hCG as a true positive. The predominant etiology of phantom hCG is the presence of heterophilic antibodies. Consequently, screening for urine hCG is indispensable for its diagnosis because immunoglobulin is not generally present in urine. Here, we report about phantom hCG after a complete hydatidiform mole. Initial urine hCG evaluations were negative, although the serum hCG levels remained positive, leading to the diagnosis of phantom hCG. After subsequent delivery, urine hCG levels persisted at diminished levels. However, a different assay yielded negative hCG results for both serum and urine samples. The patient subsequently gave birth. The absence of hCG was consistently confirmed over five years.

The distribution of heterophilic antigens and their relationship with autoimmune diseases.

Introduction: Microbial infections are associated with the occurrence of autoimmune diseases, but the mechanisms of microbial infection inducing autoimmune diseases are not fully understood. The existence of heterophilic antigens between microorganisms and human tissues may explain part of the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Here, we investigate the distribution of heterophilic antigens and its relationship with autoimmune diseases. Methods: Monoclonal antibodies against a variety of microorganisms were prepared. The titer, subclass and reactivity of antibodies with microorganisms were identified, and heterophilic antibodies that cross-reacted with human tissues were screened by human tissue microarray. The reactivity of these heterophilic antibodies with different individuals and different species was further examined by immunohistochemistry. Results: In this study, 21 strains of heterophilic antibodies were screened. The results showed that these heterophilic antibodies were produced due to the existence of heterophilic antigens between microorganism and human body and the distribution of heterophilic antigens had individual, tissue and species differences. Conclusion: Our study showed that heterophilic antigens exist widely between microorganisms and human body, and the heterophilic antigens carried by microorganisms may break the immune tolerance of the body through carrier effect and initiate immune response, which may be one of the important mechanisms of infection inducing autoimmune diseases.

Preanalytical considerations in parathyroid hormone measurement.

Automated immunoassays used to evaluate parathyroid function are vulnerable to different types of interference, which can affect clinical practices. This review provides a detailed overview of the six main types of interference known to affect the measurement of parathyroid hormone (PTH): heterophilic antibodies, biotin, PTH fragments, oxidized PTH (oxPTH), phosphorylated PTH, and some preanalytical factors. Because the prevalence of some of these conditions has been reported to approach 11.7%, and the frequency of testing for parathyroid function is important, the scale of the problem might be tremendous. Potential interference in parathyroid function testing should always be suspected whenever clinical or biochemical discrepancies arise. Their identification typically relies on additional laboratory tests, including method comparison, serial dilution, blocking reagent studies, affinity adsorption, and polyethylene glycol precipitation. Moreover, some of these issues can be mitigated with the development of mass spectrometry. This review also evaluated the clinical impact of parathyroid interference on immunoassays, including misdiagnosis, inappropriate parathyroidectomy; and delay in receiving appropriate therapy. Hence, strong communication should be maintained between the clinician and laboratory to avoid such scenarios.

Heterophilic antibodies leading to falsely positive D-dimer concentration in an adolescent.

Background: We present the case of a 15-year-old adolescent with suspected pulmonary embolism and repeatedly elevated D-dimer levels. Key Clinical Question: We aim to determine the cause for elevated D-dimer levels in a patient without venous thromboembolism. Clinical Approach: When the D-dimer measurement was repeated with different assays, D-dimer levels were within the normal reference interval. Dilution series with assay diluent or low-affinity antibody blocking reagents either did not or only partially decreased the D-dimer value using the original reagent kit. Conclusion: Analyses suggested the presence of interfering heterophilic antibodies in patient plasma, a known phenomenon with immunoturbidimetric D-dimer assays, which is rarely described. Prior to drawing this conclusion, the patient underwent extensive diagnostic testing, which led to uncertainty and discomfort for the health care providers, the patient, and their family.

Thyroglobulin Assay Interferences: Clinical Usefulness of Mass-Spectrometry Methods.

Context: Thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAbs) affect thyroglobulin immunometric assays (TgIMAs), causing falsely low results. Conversely, heterophilic antibodies (HAs) may cause falsely elevated results. Thyroglobulin (Tg) measurements by mass spectrometry (MS) resist antibody interference. The most effective use of TgIMA/TgMS in the evaluation of Tg remains unclear. Objective: The objective of this work was to study the usefulness of TgMS vs TgIMA in the presence of Tg measurement interference by HA and TgAb. Methods: In 163 thyroid cancer patients, Tg was postoperatively measured by TgIMA and TgMS. When TgIMA was elevated and TgMS undetectable, HA was assessed by serial dilution and pretreatment with HA blocking reagent. TgIMA and TgMS were compared in TgAb-positive patients with well-characterized clinical status. Results: 6 out of 45 cases with TgIMA >1 ng/mL had undetectable TgMS. HA interference was confirmed by serial dilution and HA blocking reagent addition. In TgAb-positive cases, TgIMA and TgMS were highly correlated (R2 = 0.86). In patients with structural disease and TgAb, TgIMA and TgMS were detectable in 6/19 patients, and 9/19 cases, respectively. The TgMS concentration range in the 3 discrepant cases ranged from 0.5 to 2.0 ng/mL. Hence, the presence of TgAb was associated with inappropriately reduced Tg concentrations with both TgIMA and TgMS. Conclusion: HA cause falsely elevated TgIMA with undetectable TgMS with significant frequency. TgMS can be used to rule out HA interference. Albeit resistant to TgAb in vitro, TgMS detects little Tg in patients with TgAb and structural disease. Hence, TgAb may reduce Tg concentrations in vivo. The implication is that no assay design may be able to overcome this problem. TgMS may not detect structural disease in TgAb-positive patients.

Heterophilic antibody interference with TSH measurement on different immunoassay platforms.

INTRODUCTION: Interference due to the presence of heterophilic antibodies may lead to falsely low or high analyte concentrations, but falsely elevated values are more common in most immunoassay platforms. We report a case of a 53-y old female patient underwent radical thyroidectomy for thyroid papillary carcinoma and the results of TSH in the Siemens Advia Centaur XP after surgery were not suppressed, ranging from 5.73 and 6.61 µIU/ml. METHODS: The status of the thyroid was then assessed using 4 assay platforms from Siemens, Abbott, Roche and Beckman. RESULTS: The results of TSH were 5.52, 0.54, 0.12, and <0.015 µIU/ml, respectively. After the samples were pretreated with the heterophilic antibody blocker, results given by Siemens, Abbott, and Roche showed significant decreases of 0.003, 0.001, and 0.005 µIU/ml, respectively. Therefore, it was confirmed that the presence of heterophilic antibodies in the patient samples interfered with the TSH measurements in multiple assay systems. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must be aware of the possible assay interference, including the measurements of FT4, FT3 and TSH, results may be misleading in the presence of heterophilic antibodies, in particular when the results of thyroid function tests do not fit the patient clinical presentation.

False-positive semiquantitative immunochromatography assays for procalcitonin in three patients with rheumatoid arthritis-A case series.

We report three rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with false-positive procalcitonin (PCT) based on semiquantitative immunochromatography assays without infection, but who had negative PCT assay results based on quantitative methods. Immunochromatography was useful for screening; however, other heterophilic antibodies rather than rheumatoid factor were possible to affect, especially in RA flare.

Fifth generation troponin T assay is subject to antibody interference.

BACKGROUND: The fifth generation (high-sensitivity) troponin T assay offers increased precision and analytical sensitivity to the predecessor method. The assay has proven utility in risk stratification and patient management. Upon clinical suspicion and discordant 4th generation troponin T and troponin I results, we investigated a sample for suspected interfering substances to the 5th generation troponin T assay. METHODS: The analysis included a serial dilution, treatment with polyethylene glycol, commercial antibody blocking reagents, and size exclusion chromatography. RESULTS: The sample diluted linearly (R2 = 0.9957); however, experienced a dramatic reduction in concentration after both the polyethylene glycol and blocking agent treatment. Finally, size exclusion chromatography demonstrated assay reactivity around 970 kDa range. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments elucidate a heterophilic antibody interference to the assay, and demonstrate potential measures to discern the interference.

Retrospective Approach to Evaluate Interferences in Immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in sensitivity and specificity of immunoassay technique over years, analytical interference remains to be major area of concern. The interfering substances are endogenous substances that are natural, polyreactive antibodies as heterophilic or auto antibodies, or human anti-animal antibodies together with other unsuspected binding proteins that are unique to the individual. Interfering substances can interfere with the reaction between analyte and reagent antibodies in immunoassay resulting in false positive or negative values. This ultimately results in misinterpretation of patients reports and finally to wrong course of treatment. OBJECTIVE: In our study, we used a retrospective approach to find out the extent of interferences and type of interferences in some cases during our routine practice. METHOD: The immunoassay reports which were clinically not correlating were retrospectively evaluated after discussion with the clinician. Over a period of six month a total of 42 samples were evaluated for interference for different immunoassay parameters such as Beta HCG, Estradiol, CA 125, AFP, prolactin, Hepatitis B Surface antigen (HbSAg) and troponin I. The samples were treated with commercially available antibody blocking agents and were reanalyzed. Commercially available diluents were used in some cases to evaluate high dose hook effect. Different platform, methodology and reagents were used for re -analysis. RESULTS: Out of 42 samples, 19 were found to be affected by interferences The data obtained for interferences was as follows beta HCG - 6 samples (2 positive and 4 negative interference); estradiol - 3 samples (2 positive and 1 negative interference); CA-125-3 samples (2 positive and 1 negative interference), Alfa Feto Protein - 2 samples (2 positive interference); prolactin - 1 sample (positive interference); Hepatitis B Surface antigen - 1 samples (negative interference); troponin I - 2 samples (positive interference). CONCLUSION: Despite the use of state of the art laboratory equipments, chances of interference in immunoassay analysis resulting from endogenous substances could not be ruled out. In conclusion, thorough evaluation of all immunoassay reports should be carried out in cases of suspected interference.

Elimination of falsely reactive results in a commercially-available West Nile virus IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by heterophilic antibody blocking reagents.

All sera initially reactive in the Focus Diagnostics West Nile virus IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (WNV IgM ELISA) must be retested with background subtraction to identify falsely-reactive (FR) samples due to antibodies that bind to immunoglobulins of other animal species (heterophilic antibodies). In some settings, such as pre-transplant testing of organ donors, the reporting delay associated with retesting can have an adverse impact on donor procurement and organ placement. We sought to determine if inclusion of heterophilic antibody blockers in assay conjugate could eliminate the nonspecific reactivity of FR samples. Of 6 blocking reagents evaluated using a well-characterized FR sample, immunoglobulin inhibiting reagent from Bioreclamation (IIR) and blocker from Fitzgerald Industries (BFI) were superior in their ability to inhibit false reactivity; these 2 blockers were then used to evaluate 20 additional FR and 21 truly-reactive (TR) samples. Both blockers eliminated the reactivity of 20/21 FR samples, whereas all 21 TR samples remained reactive; further, all 13 truly non-reactive (NR) samples evaluated remained non-reactive when using blocker-containing conjugate. A subset of 22 samples were tested in parallel using the initial lot and a second lot of IIR and BFI; with one exception, all samples showed the same qualitative result using both lots of a given blocker. These findings demonstrate that modification of the Focus WNV IgM screening ELISA to include heterophilic antibody blocker IIR or BFI in assay conjugate eliminates the reactivity of most FR samples, markedly reducing the number of samples requiring further testing by background subtraction.

Commercial biomarker assays: friend and foe.

AIM: Commercial kits can provide a convenient solution for measuring circulating biomarkers to support drug development. However, their suitability should be assessed in the disease matrix of interest. METHODOLOGY: Twelve biomarkers were evaluated in samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We used immunoassay kits from five vendors on three multiplexed platforms. Kit suitability was evaluated on the basis of detectability and prespecified performance acceptance criteria. RESULTS: Assays had varying levels of sensitivity and susceptibility to interference by matrix components. Only a few assays in the multiplexed kits were found to be suitable. In general, kits for analytes that passed our assay criteria showed good correlation between vendors. CONCLUSION: The data from this study demonstrate that the majority of assays on multiplexed kits evaluated either lacked sensitivity and/or had poor performance, which diminishes the utility of the multiplexing approach.