Diagnosis and initial treatment of transplant-eligible high-risk myeloma patients: A British Society for Haematology/UK Myeloma Society Good Practice Paper.

This Good Practice Paper provides recommendations for the diagnosis and initial management of transplant-eligible high-risk myeloma patients. It describes recent updates to the genetic diagnostics of high-risk myeloma and provides recommendations for treatment on the basis of recent prospective clinical trial evidence.

Risk-adapted treatment in multiple myeloma: Does more make it merrier?

Kaiser et al. offer management recommendations for transplant-eligible, high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM), derived from recent trials exploring treatment intensification in the various phases of front-line therapy. The definition of HRMM continues to evolve with emergence of novel genomic insights and impact of modern therapies, underscoring the need to expand beyond traditional interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization cytogenetics and International Staging System staging for a precise risk assessment. Despite progress, ongoing challenges in treatment delivery and tolerability underscore the urgency for exploring novel approaches like T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell to enhance outcomes in this complex patient population. Commentary on: Kaiser et al. Diagnosis and initial treatment of transplant-eligible high-risk myeloma patients: A British Society for Haematology/UK Myeloma Society Good Practice Paper. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:833-839.

Quantitative Analysis of Whole-Body MRI for Accessing the Degree of Diffuse Infiltration Patterns and Identifying High Risk Cases of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) is important for prognostication. The degree of diffuse infiltration patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with patient prognosis in multiple myeloma. However, objective indexes to determine the degree of diffuse infiltration patterns are unavailable. PURPOSE: To investigate whether qualitative and quantitative evaluations of diffuse infiltration patterns on MRI could identify HRMM. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Totally, 180 patients (79 HRMM and 101 standard-risk MM) were assessed. The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, and/or p53 mutations was considered to indicate HRMM. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T/diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS), modified Dixon chemical-shift imaging Quant (mDIXON Quant), and short TI inversion recovery (STIR). ASSESSMENT: Qualitative analysis involved assessing the degree of diffuse marrow infiltration (mild, moderate, or severe), and quantitative analysis involved evaluating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fat fraction (FF), and T2* values. Clinical data such as sex, age, hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum calcium, serum creatinine, serum lactate dehydrogenase, ß2-microglobulin, and bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) were also included. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The high-risk group had significantly higher ADC and T2* and lower FF compared with the standard-risk group. Multivariate analysis indicated BMPCs as a significant independent risk factor for HRMM (odds ratio (OR) = 1.019, 95% CI 1.004-1.033), while FF was a significant independent protective factor associated with HRMM (OR = 0.972, 95% CI 0.946-0.999). The combination of BMPCs and FF achieved the highest areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.732, with sensitivity and specificity of 70.9% and 68.3%, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION: Compared with qualitative analysis, FF value was independently associated with HRMM. The quantitative features of diffuse marrow infiltration on MRI scans are more effective in detecting HRMM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

CD34-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Relapsed, High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

We report results of a retrospective analysis of 44 patients with relapsed and high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing allogeneic CD34-selected hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from HLA-compatible donors. Patients had multiply relapsed disease including relapse at <15 months after autologous transplantation and most patients (28 of 44; 65%) also had high-risk cytogenetics. Before transplantation, patients received busulfan (.8 mg/kg × 10 doses), melphalan (70 mg/m(2) × 2 days), fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) × 5 days), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (2.5 mg/kg × 2 days). Patients with 10/10 HLA- matched donors were treated prophylactically with low doses of donor lymphocyte infusions (.5 to 1 × 10(6) CD3(+)/kg) starting 4 to 6 months after CD34-selected HSCT. Acute (grade II to IV) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and transplantation-related mortality at 12 months were 2% and 18%, respectively. Chronic GVHD was not observed in any patient. Overall and progression-free survival at 2 years were 54% and 31%, respectively. By multivariate analyses, the outcomes of CD34-selected HSCT were influenced by presence of extramedullary disease, disease status before CD34-selected HSCT, and age. This study demonstrates notable safety and efficacy of CD34-selected HSCT in patients with multiply relapsed MM, including those with high-risk cytogenetics.

Efficacy of Selinexor in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients with del17p and Other High-Risk Abnormalities (A Retrospective Single-Center Study).

Selinexor (Seli) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein, exportin-1 (XPO1). Seli exhibits its antitumor effect through the blockage of XPO1, which increases nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), including p53, thereby limiting the translation of oncogenes, triggering cell cycle arrest and the death of malignant cells. Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients with del17p are deficient in TP53 and have a particularly poor prognosis. Given its unique mechanism of action, we investigated whether Seli has increased efficacy in RRMM patients with del17p compared to other high-risk cytogenetics (OHRC). This is an IRB-approved observational study of RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t (4;14), t (14;16) or gain 1q) or standard-risk cytogenetics treated at the Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) with a Seli-based regimen between January 2019 and December 2022. Time-to-event endpoints (PFS, OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Log-rank tests compared time-to-event endpoints between cohorts [del17p vs. OHRC vs. standard risk]. We identified 40 RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including 16 patients with del17p and 24 patients with OHRC, as well as 20 with standard-risk cytogenetics. The median age was 62.5 vs. 69 vs. 65.5 years (del17p group vs. OHRC vs. standard risk). The median prior line of therapies was five (range: 3-16) with similar rates of prior autologous stem cell transplant in all arms (68.8% vs. 62.5% vs. 70.0%). The most frequently used regimens were Seli-Pomalidomide-dexamethasone(dex) or Seli-Carfilzomib-dex (Seli-Kd) in the del17p group and Seli-Kd in the OHRC and standard-risk groups. The median time to start the Seli-based regimen after initial MM diagnosis was 5.6 years for the del17p group, 4.1 years in OHRC, and 4.8 years in the standard-risk group. The median follow-up time after the start of the Seli-based regimen was 10.5 months (mos) in the del17p group, 8.4 mos in OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group. In the del17p group, 50% had an objective response, 41.7% in the OHRC, and 35% in the standard-risk group (p = 0.71). Depth of response was also similar across the arms (12.5% vs. 12.5% vs. 10.0% VGPR p = 0.99). The median OS was 10.9 mos in the del17p group, 10.3 mos in the OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group (p = 0.92). The median OS was 15.5 mos for patients who received Seli as a bridging therapy versus 9 mos for Seli use for other reasons rather than as a bridge. Overall, Seli-based regimens showed promising responses even in this heavily pretreated population. Our analysis suggests that Seli-based regimens lead to similar outcomes among RRMM patients with del17p, OHRC, and standard-risk cytogenetics. This contrasts with previously reported outcomes using combinations of novel therapies in this population, where the del17p patients often have a poorer prognosis. Interestingly, our data suggest that Seli is a particularly effective bridging modality for patients preparing for CAR-T cell therapies in our population. Further investigation into this population is warranted, including in earlier lines of therapy, in hopes of seeing a more durable response.

Post-ASCT consolidation with elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in high-risk and ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma: a retrospective single-center study.

Patients with high-risk multiple-myeloma (HRMM) and ultra-high-risk multiple-myeloma (UHRMM) show rapid disease progression and shorter survival compared to those with standard-risk multiple-myeloma (SRMM). Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has shown inferior outcomes in this subgroup compared to SRMM, and there is an unmet need for improved post-ASCT therapy. This retrospective study, from September 2016 to March 2023, assesses elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (ERd or EPd) as consolidation therapy post-ASCT for HRMM and UHRMM patients. HRMM (1 cytogenetic abnormality) and UHRMM (≥2 cytogenetic abnormalities) were defined using IMWG and mSMART criteria. Among 75 patients (median age: 64 years), 59 received ERd and 16 EPd. Median progression-free survival was 29.3 months for all patients, 32.7 months for HRMM, and 21.9 months for UHRMM. Elotuzumab plus an IMiD consolidation therapy post-ASCT demonstrated promising efficacy compared to other studies, with a fixed duration and reduced lenalidomide-related toxicity.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Double-Hit/Triple-Hit Multiple Myeloma Detected at Relapse.

Introduction: mSMART classifies high-risk Multiple Myeloma patients into Double Hit and Triple Hit Myeloma (DH/THM) on the basis of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities detected. We aimed to study the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with DH/THM detected at relapse in a real-world setting. Methods: The case records of all relapsed multiple myeloma patients with DH/THM diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2020 were identified and information regarding baseline characteristics, therapy and outcomes was noted. Results: Seventeen patients were diagnosed with DH/THM at relapse during the study period. Twelve patients (70.6%) were in first relapse, while 3 patients were diagnosed at second relapse and 1 patient each at 3rd and 5th relapse respectively. The most common cytogenetic combination was IgH-FGFR3 translocation with gain of 1q (seen in 10 patients; 58.8%). Ten patients (58.8%) died within the first 2 months of diagnosis and 16 patients (94.1%) died during follow up (range 0-16 months). The most common cause of death was progressive/active disease (9 patients, 56.3%). Discussion: The outcome of DH/THM at relapse is associated with an aggressive presentation and poor outcomes in the real-world setting. These patients are candidates for early aggressive or novel therapy or clinical trials.

Adoptive Immunotherapy and High-Risk Myeloma.

Despite significant improvements in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains mostly incurable, highlighting a need for new therapeutic approaches. Patients with high-risk disease characteristics have a particularly poor prognosis and limited response to current frontline therapies. The recent development of immunotherapeutic strategies, particularly T cell-based agents have changed the treatment landscape for patients with relapsed and refractory disease. Adoptive cellular therapies include chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, which have emerged as a highly promising therapy, particularly for patients with refractory disease. Other adoptive cellular approaches currently in trials include T cell receptor-based therapy (TCR), and the expansion of CAR technology to natural killer (NK) cells. In this review we explore the emerging therapeutic field of adoptive cellular therapy for MM, with a particular focus on the clinical impact of these therapies for patients with high-risk myeloma.

High-risk multiple myeloma predicted by circulating plasma cells and its genetic characteristics.

Introduction: Circulating plasma cells (CPC) have been reported to be one of the indicators of high-risk multiple myeloma (MM), yet the prognostic significance of CPC in Chinese population and the genetic mechanisms underlying CPC formation have not been fully elucidated. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed MM were included in this study. We used multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC) for CPC quantification and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology for mutational landscape mapping to identify the correlation of CPC level with clinical characteristics and the mutations. Results: A total of 301 patients were enrolled in this investigation. We demonstrated that CPC quantification could effectively mirror the tumor load, and CPC ≥ 0.105% at diagnosis or detectable CPC after therapy indicates poor treatment response and adverse outcome, and the introduction of CPC into the R-ISS enables a more accurate risk stratification. Interestingly, we noticed an elevated percentage of light-chain MM in patients with higher CPC. Mutational landscape revealed that patients harboring mutations in TP53, BRAF, DNMT3A, TENT5C, and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway-related genes tended to have higher CPC levels. Gene enrichment analysis demonstrated that pathways involving chromosome regulation and adhesion may be potential mechanisms accounting for CPC formation. Discussion: Accordingly, quantification of CPC may provide a less-invasive and reliable approach for identifying high-risk MM in Chinese population.

Risk Assessment for Newly Diagnosed Fit Young Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Treatment Modalities: Should There Be Additional Factors Taken into Consideration??

Introduction: The optimal treatment for young patients with high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains a challenge. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 58 NDMM patients younger than 55 years treated in our center from 2010 to 2021 with the current recommended protocols. Results: After a median follow-up of 48 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached; however, approximately 25% of them died within 4 years after diagnosis. Advanced disease stage, presence of extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, and less than very good remission before autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation adversely affected patient survival. Based on these factors, we created a risk-assessment scoring system that sufficiently discriminated young NDMM patients at risk of poor outcome. The 4-year OS was superior for patients with zero to two factors to those with three to five factors (86% vs 44%, p<0.001). Conclusion: The proposed scoring system could be reliably used at diagnosis and at interim disease evaluation in aiming for personalized treatment for young NDMM patients.

Experts' consensus on the definition and management of high risk multiple myeloma.

High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) at diagnosis is currently recognized according to the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) which was set up in 2015. Since then, new clinical and biological prognostic factors have been developed, which could implement the definition of High Risk (HR) category. We conducted a survey in order to identify which additional parameters, both clinical and biological, are considered more useful for the clinical practice and to evaluate if the management of Multiple Myeloma (MM) should change on the basis of the risk category. A questionnaire, consisting of 8 statements, was submitted to 6 Italian experts, from the European Myeloma Network (EMN) Research Italy, using the Delphi method. The colleagues were asked to answer each question using a scale between 0 and 100. If a statement did not reach at least 75 out of 100 points from all the participants, it was rephrased on the basis of the proposal of the experts and resubmitted in a second or further round, until a consensus was reached among all. From the first round of the survey a strong consensus was reached regarding the opportunity to revise the R-ISS including chromosome 1 abnormality, TP53 mutation or deletion, circulating plasma cells by next generation flow and extramedullary plasmacytomas. No consensus was reached for the definition of "double hit" MM and for the application in clinical practice of treatment strategies based on the risk category. In the second round of the Delphi questionnaire, "double-hit" MM was recognized by the association of at least two high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. Moreover, the experts agreed to reserve an intensified treatment only to specific conditions, such as plasma cell leukaemia or patients with multiple extramedullary plasmacytomas, while they admitted that there are not sufficient real word data in order to modify treatment on the basis of MRD assessment in clinical practice. This survey suggests that the definition of HRMM should be implemented by additional clinical and biological risk factors, that will be useful to guide treatment in the future.

Knowing the unknowns in high risk multiple myeloma.

High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) continues to portend worse outcomes despite the many advances in anti-myeloma therapeutics. The optimal approach to treatment is not clearly defined on account of the variable definitions of HRMM and the paucity of studies dedicated to the treatment of HRMM. In this review, we use a case-based approach to review the definitions of HRMM, and evaluate the evidence for induction, stem cell transplantation, and post-transplant therapy approaches for HRMM.