RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the typical clinical course of reversible persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) from perinatal etiologies and compare that with the clinical course of PPHN due to underlying fetal developmental etiologies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of liveborn newborns either born or transferred to our facility for higher level of care between 2015 and 2020 with gestational age ≥35 weeks and a clinical diagnosis of PPHN in the electronic health record. Newborns with complex congenital heart disease and congenital diaphragmatic hernia were excluded. Using all data available at time of collection, newborns were stratified into 2 groups by PPHN etiology - perinatal and fetal developmental causes. Primary outcomes were age at initiation, discontinuation, and total duration of extracorporeal life support, mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen, inhaled nitric oxide, inotropic support, and prostaglandin E1. Our secondary outcome was age at echocardiographic resolution of pulmonary hypertension. Groups were compared by t-test. Time-to-event Kaplan Meier curves described and compared (log-rank test) discontinuation of each therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-four (72%) newborns had perinatal etiologies whereas 24 (28%) had fetal developmental etiologies. The resolution of perinatal PPHN was more rapid compared with fetal developmental PPHN. By 10 days of age, more neonates were off inotropes (98% vs 29%, P < .01), decannulated from extracorporeal life support (100% vs 0%, P < .01), extubated (75% vs 37%, P < .01), and had echocardiographic resolution of PH (35% vs 7%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: An atypical PPHN course, characterized by persistent targeted therapies in the second week of life, warrants further work-up for fetal developmental causes.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/terapia , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Ecocardiografia , Idade Gestacional , Respiração ArtificialRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Psittacosis can cause severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical manifestations of psittacosis range from subclinical to fulminant psittacosis with multi-organ failure. It is essential to summarize the clinical characteristic of patients with severe psittacosis accompanied by acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with severe psittacosis caused CAP accompanied by AHRF from 19 tertiary hospitals of China. We recorded the clinical data, antimicrobial therapy, respiratory support, complications, and outcomes. Chlamydia psittaci was detected on the basis of metagenomic next-generation sequencing performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Patient outcomes were compared between the treatment methods. RESULTS: This study included 45 patients with severe CAP and AHRF caused by psittacosis from April 2018 to May 2021. The highest incidence of these infections was between September and April. There was a history of poultry contact in 64.4% of the patients. The median PaO2/FiO2 of the patients was 119.8 (interquartile range, 73.2 to 183.6) mmHg. Four of 45 patients (8.9%) died in the ICU, and the median ICU duration was 12 days (interquartile range, 8 to 21) days. There were no significant differences between patients treated with fluoroquinolone initially and continued after the diagnosis, fluoroquinolone initially followed by tetracycline, and fluoroquinolone combined with tetracycline. CONCLUSION: Psittacosis caused severe CAP seems not rare, especially in the patients with the history of exposure to poultry or birds. Empirical treatment that covers atypical pathogens may benefit such patients, which fluoroquinolones might be considered as an alternative.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Psitacose , Insuficiência Respiratória , Animais , Humanos , Psitacose/complicações , Psitacose/diagnóstico , Psitacose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Tetraciclina/uso terapêutico , Aves Domésticas , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , China/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning has been widely used in non-intubated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19, but the evidence is mostly from observational studies and low-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with conflicting results from published studies. A systematic review of published high-quality RCTs to resolve the controversy over the efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with AHRF due to COVID-19. METHODS: Candidate studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus databases from December 1, 2019 to November 1, 2022. Literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by two researchers. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2657 patients were included. Meta-analysis of fixed effects models showed that awake prone positioning did not increase mortality(OR = 0.88, 95%CI [0.72, 1.08]), length of stay in ICU (WMD = 1.14, 95%CI [-0.45, 2.72]), total length of stay (WMD = 0.11, 95%CI [-1.02, 1.23]), or incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.79, 1.31]) compared with usual care, but significantly reduced the intubation rate (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.60, 0.86]). Similar results were found in a subgroup analysis of patients who received only high flow nasal cannula (Mortality: OR = 0.86, 95%CI [0.70, 1.05]; Intubation rate: OR = 0.69, 95%CI [0.58, 0.83]). All eight RCTs had high quality of evidence, which ensured the reliability of the meta-analysis results. CONCLUSIONS: Awake prone positioning is safe and feasible in non-intubated patients with AHRF caused by COVID-19, and can significantly reduce the intubation rate. More studies are needed to explore standardized implementation strategies for the awake prone positioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023394113.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Insuficiência Respiratória , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , Vigília , Decúbito Ventral , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Hipóxia/complicações , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/complicações , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Determining a patient's candidacy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in severe COVID-19 pneumonia is a critical aspect of efficient healthcare delivery. A body mass index (BMI) ≥40 is considered a relative contraindication for ECMO by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). We sought to determine the impact of obesity on the survival of patients with COVID-19 on ECMO. METHODS: This project was a retrospective review of a multicenter US database from January 2020 to December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality after ECMO initiation, with a comparison between patients classified into body mass index categories (<30, 30-39.9, and ≥40). Secondary outcomes included ventilator days, intensive care days, and complications. RESULTS: We completed records review on 359 patients, with 90 patients excluded because of missing data. The overall mortality for the 269 patients was 37.5%. Patients with a BMI <30 had higher odds of mortality compared to all patients with BMI >30 (OR 1.98; p = 0.013), those with BMI 30-39.9 (OR 1.84; p = 0.036), and BMI ≥40 (OR 2.33; p = 0.024). There were no differences between BMI groups for ECMO duration; length of stay (LOS); or rate of bloodstream infection, stroke, or blood transfusion. Age, ECMO duration, and modified-Elixhauser index were not independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19, neither obesity (BMI >30) nor morbid obesity (BMI >40) were associated with in-hospital mortality. These results are consistent with previous reports and held true after adjusting for age and comorbidities. Our data suggest further examination of the recommendations to withhold ECMO in patients who are obese.
RESUMO
Nitric oxide is a messenger molecule for vasodilation of vascular smooth muscle cells, and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) can dilate pulmonary blood vessels and reduce pulmonary vascular resistance, thereby reducing pulmonary artery pressure, but with no influence on systemic circulation pressure. Guidelines in China and overseas recommend the use of iNO in full-term infants and late preterm infants, and it has been proved that it has a marked effect on persistent pulmonary hypertension and hypoxic respiratory failure in such infants. However, recent studies have shown that there is an increase in the off-label use of iNO in preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks. This article reviews the research progress on the efficacy, safety, timing, dose, and withdrawal mode of iNO and its combination with vasoactive drugs in the treatment of preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks in China and overseas, so as to provide a reference for clinical application.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There have been over 200 million cases and 4.4 million deaths from COVID-19 worldwide. Despite the lack of robust evidence one potential treatment for COVID-19 associated severe hypoxaemia is inhaled pulmonary vasodilator (IPVD) therapy, using either nitric oxide (iNO) or prostaglandins. We describe the implementation of, and outcomes from, a protocol using IPVDs in a cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 associated respiratory failure receiving maximal conventional support. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at a large teaching hospital were analysed for the period 14th March 2020 - 11th February 2021. An IPVD was considered if the PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio was less than 13.3kPa despite maximal conventional therapy. Nitric oxide was commenced at 20ppm and titrated to response. If oxygenation improved Iloprost nebulisers were commenced and iNO weaned. The primary outcome was percentage changes in PF ratio and Alveolar-arterial (A-a) gradient. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received IPVD therapy during the study period. The median PF ratio before IPVD therapy was commenced was 11.33kPa (9.93-12.91). Patients receiving an IPVD had a lower PF ratio (14.37 vs. 16.37kPa, p = 0.002) and higher APACHE-II score (17 vs. 13, p = 0.028) at ICU admission. At 72 hours after initiating an IPVD the median improvement in PF ratio was 33.9% (-4.3-84.1). At 72 hours changes in PF ratio (70.8 vs. -4.1%, p < 0.001) and reduction in A-a gradient (44.7 vs. 14.8%, p < 0.001) differed significantly between survivors (n = 33) and non-survivors (n = 26). CONCLUSIONS: The response to IPVDs in patients with COVID-19 associated acute hypoxic respiratory failure differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors. Both iNO and prostaglandins may offer therapeutic options for patients with severe refractory hypoxaemia due to COVID-19. The use of inhaled prostaglandins, and iNO where feasible, should be studied in adequately powered prospective randomised trials.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Insuficiência Respiratória , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , COVID-19/complicações , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Humanos , Hipóxia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipóxia/etiologia , Óxido Nítrico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostaglandinas/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Respiratória/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Despite hypoxic respiratory failure representing a large portion of total hospitalizations and healthcare spending worldwide, therapeutic options beyond mechanical ventilation are limited. We demonstrate the technical feasibility of providing oxygen to a bulk medium, such as blood, via diffusion across nonporous hollow fiber membranes (HFMs) using hyperbaric oxygen. The oxygen transfer across Teflon® membranes was characterized at oxygen pressures up to 2 bars in both a stirred tank vessel (CSTR) and a tubular device mimicking intravenous application. Fluxes over 550 ml min-1 m-2 were observed in well-mixed systems, and just over 350 ml min-1 m-2 in flow through tubular systems. Oxygen flux was proportional to the oxygen partial pressure inside the HFM over the tested range and increased with mixing of the bulk liquid. Some bubbles were observed at the higher pressures (1.9 bar) and when bulk liquid dissolved oxygen concentrations were high. High-frequency ultrasound was applied to detect and count individual bubbles, but no increase from background levels was detected during lower pressure operation. A conceptual model of the oxygen transport was developed and validated. Model parametric sensitivity studies demonstrated that diffusion through the thin fiber walls was a significant resistance to mass transfer, and that promoting convection around the fibers should enable physiologically relevant oxygen supply. This study indicates that a device is within reach that is capable of delivering greater than 10% of a patient's basal oxygen needs in a configuration that readily fits intravascularly.
Assuntos
Catéteres , Desenho de Equipamento , Membranas Artificiais , Oxigênio/farmacologia , Oxigenadores , Oxigênio/químicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of anemia based on admission hemoglobin (Hb) level as a prognostic risk factor for severe outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from a random sample of 733 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) obtained from a total of 4356 laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases who presented to the Emergency Department of Montefiore Medical Center between March-June 2020. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of in-hospital severe outcomes of COVID-19. A secondary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among the 733 patients included in our final analysis, 438 patients (59.8%) presented with anemia. 105 patients (14.3%) had mild, and 333 patients (45.5%) had moderate-severe anemia. Overall, 437 patients (59.6%) had a composite endpoint of severe outcomes. On-admission anemia was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, (Odds Ratio 1.52, 95% CI [1.01-2.30], p = 0.046) but not for composite severe outcomes. However, moderate-severe anemia (Hb < 11 g/dL) on admission was independently associated with both severe outcomes (OR1.53, 95% CI [1.05-2.23], p = 0.028) and mortality (OR 1.67, 95% CI [1.09-2.56], p = 0.019) during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Anemia on admission was independently associated with increased odds of all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Furthermore, moderate-severe anemia (Hb <11 g/dL) was an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Moving forward, COVID-19 patient management and risk stratification may benefit from addressing anemia on admission.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Anemia/sangue , COVID-19/sangue , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hipotensão/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Choque Séptico/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anemia/terapia , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Background and Objectives: In the intensive care unit (ICU), renal failure and respiratory failure are two of the most common organ failures in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). These clinical symptoms usually result from sepsis, trauma, hypermetabolism or shock. If this syndrome is caused by septic shock, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle suggests that vasopressin be given to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 65 mmHg if the patient is hypotensive after fluid resuscitation. Nevertheless, it is important to note that some studies found an effect of various mean arterial pressures on organ function; for example, a MAP of less than 75 mmHg was associated with the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, no published study has evaluated the risk factors of mortality in the subgroup of acute kidney injury with respiratory failure, and little is known of the impact of general risk factors that may increase the mortality rate. Materials and Methods: The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors that might directly affect survival in critically ill patients with multiple organ failure in this subgroup. We retrospectively constructed a cohort study of patients who were admitted to the ICUs, including medical, surgical, and neurological, over 24 months (2015.1 to 2016.12) at Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. We only considered patients who met the criteria of acute renal injury according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) and were undergoing mechanical ventilator support due to acute respiratory failure at admission. Results: Data showed that the overall ICU and hospital mortality rate was 63.5%. The most common cause of ICU admission in this cohort study was cardiovascular disease (31.7%) followed by respiratory disease (28.6%). Most patients (73%) suffered sepsis during their ICU admission and the mean length of hospital stay was 24.32 ± 25.73 days. In general, the factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality were lactate > 51.8 mg/dL, MAP ≤ 77.16 mmHg, and pH ≤ 7.22. The risk of in-patient mortality was analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression survival model. Adjusting for other covariates, MAP ≤ 77.16 mmHg was associated with higher probability of in-hospital death [OR = 3.06 (1.374-6.853), p = 0.006]. The other independent outcome predictor of mortality was pH ≤ 7.22 [OR = 2.40 (1.122-5.147), p = 0.024]. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and the log rank statistic was highly significant. Conclusions: Acute kidney injury combined with respiratory failure is associated with high mortality. High mean arterial pressure and normal blood pH might improve these outcomes. Therefore, the acid-base status and MAP should be considered when attempting to predict outcome. Moreover, the blood pressure targets for acute kidney injury in critical care should not be similar to those recommended for the general population and might prevent mortality.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Insuficiência Respiratória , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Pressão Arterial , Artérias , Estudos de Coortes , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Oxygen supplementation is required for approximately 14% of the patients diagnosed of having COVID-19 infection. Despite the use of conventional oxygen therapy, 5% among these require treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU). Here, we are describing a situation in which oxygen therapy was delivered to the patients by making an assembly of oxygen tubing, three-way stopcock, and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) present in the hospital setting following the malfunction of air blender of HFNC machine (Fig. 1). This assembly might be useful as rescue oxygen therapy during a malfunction of HFNC machine and in resource-limited settings where HFNC machine is not available. The mechanisms of action could be (1) washout of anatomic dead space due to medium oxygen flow, (2) improved gas mixing in large airways, and (3) increased oxygen concentration inside the conducting airway. How to cite this article: Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar N, Kumar A, Singh V, Kumar S, et al. Repackaging of Malfunctioning High-flow Nasal Cannula as a Rescue Oxygen Therapy: An Innovation amid COVID-19 Crisis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(8):948-949.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Substantial numbers of neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) do not immediately respond to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and are often labeled as non-responders. This retrospective data analysis assessed time to treatment response in the iNO key registration trial. METHODS: Treatment response was defined as a ≥10% increase in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) or a ≥10% decrease in oxygenation index (OI) after initiation of study gas without the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The proportion of patients showing a response at 30 min, 1 h, 24 h, and >24 h after iNO or placebo initiation was calculated and stratified by baseline PaO2 and OI. RESULTS: Data from 248 patients (iNO: n = 126; placebo: n = 122) were included; 66 patients receiving iNO showed improvement in oxygenation without needing ECMO versus 38 receiving placebo. Of the 66 iNO responders, 73% responded within ≤30 min, 9% within ≤1 h, 12% within ≤24 h, and 6% after 24 h. Of the 38 patients with improvement in oxygenation without needing ECMO while receiving placebo, 53% showed improvement within ≤30 min, 16% within ≤1 h, 29% within ≤24 h, and 3% after 24 h. Baseline disease severity was not predictive of time to response. Of the 48 patients in the iNO treatment group who were classified as non-responders due to eventual need for ECMO and not included in the analysis of responders, 40 (83%) had an initial improvement in oxygenation during iNO therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in PaO2 and OI after iNO initiation appear to be imprecise biomarkers of response to therapy in neonates with HRF. In some patients treated with iNO, it took up to 24 h to achieve improvement in oxygenation without need for ECMO, and a majority of those who eventually required ECMO did show an initial improvement in oxygenation during iNO treatment. Thus, reliable, objective, early criteria for iNO response still need to be established, and initial PaO2/OI responses should be interpreted with caution, particularly when considering discontinuing iNO therapy.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Óxido Nítrico/administração & dosagem , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração por Inalação , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze data from a registry of Japanese neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH) to compare the effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in neonates born <34 weeks vs. ≥34 weeks gestational age (GA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: iNO was administered according to approved Japanese product labeling. Study data were collected before iNO administration and at predefined intervals until discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 1,114 neonates were included (n=431, <34 weeks GA; n=675, ≥34 weeks GA; n=8, missing age data). Mean decrease from baseline oxygenation index (OI) was similar in both age groups. OI reduction was more pronounced in the <34 weeks subgroups with baseline OI ≥25. Survival rates were similar in the <34 weeks GA and ≥34 weeks GA groups stratified by baseline OI (OI<15, 89% vs. 93%; 15≤OI<25, 85% vs. 91%; 25≤OI≤40, 73% vs. 79%; OI>40, 64% vs. 66%). CONCLUSION: iNO improved oxygenation in preterm neonates as effectively as in late preterm and term neonates, without negative impact on survival. If clinically significant PH is present, as measured by pulse oximetry or echocardiography, a therapeutic trial of iNO might be indicated for preterm neonates.
Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Óxido Nítrico/administração & dosagem , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/terapia , Administração por Inalação , Asfixia Neonatal/complicações , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Japão , Masculino , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/complicações , Sistema de Registros , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
First described in 1959, intravascular lymphoma (IVL) remains one of the most clinically challenging diagnoses due to its diverse and non-specific clinical manifestations and evasiveness in detection by standard investigations. Indeed, IVL deserves the title of 'medicine's greatest imitator'. We highlight a case of IVL where the diagnosis came too late in the clinical course, detected by random skin biopsy. Clinicians should strongly consider this diagnosis in presentations with persistent symptomatology despite appropriate interventions.
Assuntos
Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiologia , Gordura Subcutânea/irrigação sanguínea , Gordura Subcutânea/patologia , Neoplasias Vasculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Vasculares/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/fisiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) can present with hypoxia and right ventricular dysfunction with resultant inadequate oxygen delivery and end-organ damage. This study describes the use of prostaglandin-E1 (PGE) for ductal patency to preserve right ventricular systolic function and limit afterload in newborns with PPHN. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that follows the hemodynamics, markers of end-organ perfusion, length of therapeutics, and echocardiographic variables of 57 newborns who used prostglandin-E1 in the setting of PPHN. RESULTS: Tachycardia, lactic acidosis, and supplemental oxygen use improved following PGE initiation. Fractional area change (FAC), to assess right ventricular systolic function, and pulmonary arterial acceleration time indexed to right ventricular ejection time (PAAT/RVET), to assess right ventricular afterload, also improved over three time points relative to PGE use (before, during, and after). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we described the safety and utility of PGE in newborns with severe PPHN for stabilization while allowing natural disease progression.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Pulmonar , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/tratamento farmacológico , Prostaglandinas , OxigênioRESUMO
Aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in more than 6 million deaths worldwide. Studies on the impact of obesity on patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia have been conflicting, with some studies describing worse outcomes in patients with obesity, while other studies reporting no difference in outcomes. Previous studies on obesity and critical illness have described improved outcomes in patients with obesity, termed the "obesity paradox." The study assessed the impact of obesity on the outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalizations, using a nationally representative database. Materials and Methods: ICD-10 code U071 was used to identify all hospitalizations with the principal diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in the National Inpatient Database 2020. ICD-10 codes were used to identify outcomes and comorbidities. Hospitalizations were grouped based on body mass index (BMI). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Results: A total of 56,033 hospitalizations were identified. 48% were male, 49% were white and 22% were black. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia in the setting of obesity and clinically severe obesity were often younger. Adjusted for differences in comorbidities, there was a significant increase in mortality, incidence of mechanical ventilation, shock, and sepsis with increased BMI. The mortality was highest among hospitalizations with BMI ≥60, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.66 (95% Confidence interval 2.18-3.24) compared to hospitalizations with normal BMI. There were increased odds of mechanical ventilation across all BMI groups above normal, with the odds of mechanical ventilation increasing with increasing BMI. Conclusion: The results show that obesity is independently associated with worse patient outcomes in COVID-19 hospitalizations and is associated with higher in-patient mortality and higher rates of mechanical ventilation. The underlying mechanism of this is unclear, and further studies are needed to investigate the cause of this.
RESUMO
This case report describes the clinical course of a 73-year-old postmenopausal female presenting with a persistent cough, breathlessness, and hypertension. Upon examination, she exhibited signs of respiratory distress, prompting transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) where type 1 respiratory failure was diagnosed. Chest imaging revealed bilateral lung opacities, leading to a diagnosis of lung metastasis. Subsequent screening investigations unveiled endometrial carcinoma with atypical respiratory symptoms, highlighting the importance of thorough evaluation. Despite prompt management and biopsy confirmation, the patient's condition rapidly deteriorated, underscoring the aggressive nature of metastatic endometrial carcinoma. This case underscores the necessity of considering atypical presentations and timely intervention in managing such malignancies.
RESUMO
Introduction Identification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients at risk of worse clinical outcomes is crucial to improving patient care. Various biochemical markers have been used to predict outcomes in such patients. We aimed to evaluate the role of serum PCT (procalcitonin) and the utility of PCT clearance (PCTc) in predicting the outcome of patients with COVID-19 illness. Methods We prospectively included 39 patients with severe or critical COVID-19 illness with an age equal to more than 18 years. In addition to routine baseline investigations, serum PCT was measured at admission (PCT1) and day 5 of hospitalization (PCT2). PCTc was calculated using the formula [Formula: see text]. Results We observed that serum PCT at admission was significantly higher in non-survivors (median: 1.9 ng/ml IQR: 0.51-4.23) compared to survivors (median 0.35 (IQR: 0.1-1.2), p 0.002). On serial serum-PCT estimation, non-survivors had persistently elevated serum-PCT (median PCT1:1.9 ng/ml (IQR: 0.51-4.23) to median PCT2: 1.9ng/ml (IQR: 0.83-2.72), p 0.51) than survivors (median PCT1:0.35ng/ml (IQR: 0.1-1.19) to median PCT2: 0.15ng/ml (IQR: 0.05-0.29), p 0.01). However, no difference in serum PCTc was observed between the two groups (median: 35.3% (IQR: 12.5-84.9) in survivors vs. 71.7% (33.3-91.7) in non-survivors, p = 0.165). Conclusion Serum PCT is a potential biochemical marker that could predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Measurement of serial serum PCT and estimation of PCT clearance may serve as better predictors than a single value; however, well-designed studies are required to identify the definite role of serum PCT in COVID-19 patients of varying severity.
RESUMO
We present the case of a 63-year-old female diagnosed with atypical SSc in the setting of acute SRC. She was undergoing work-up for progressive dyspnoea in the outpatient setting when she was found to have newly diagnosed restrictive lung pathology and worsening renal function, thus prompting acute hospital admission. Given multisystem involvement of the pulmonary and renal systems, the differential diagnosis included autoimmune and connective tissue disorders. Although serologies were non-specific, renal biopsy confirmed scleroderma renal disease, and she was started on treatment with captopril. This case highlights the importance of clinical judgment and timely diagnosis, even when laboratory data might indicate otherwise. LEARNING POINTS: Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc), and clinicians should have a high index of suspicion to diagnose it.The absence of specific serologic markers makes SSc diagnosis challenging and necessitates reliance on clinical findings and additional diagnostic tools such as imaging studies and tissue sampling.
RESUMO
Background: Clinical judgment is essential in determining the need for specialist consultation. We evaluated patients for whom the pulmonary team was consulted for unspecified hypoxia or acute hypoxic respiratory failure to better understand the characteristics and outcomes of such encounters. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who received consults for unspecified hypoxia or acute hypoxic respiratory failure at a tertiary center. Outcomes evaluated were length of stay, duration of follow-up, and clinical trajectory. Results: We identified 103 patients over a 2-year period. The level of care was escalated in 69.9% (n = 72) of patients, and the majority had procedural interventions such as bronchoscopies and chest tube placement. Common diagnoses were pneumonia and volume overload. The mortality rate was 17.5% (n = 18). The mean length of stay was 24 days (standard deviation [SD] 24.1), with an average of 6.6 hospital days (SD 9.9) to consultation. The mean duration of consecutive follow-up was 4.5 days (SD 7.5). Patients who underwent procedures had a shorter duration of follow-up. Conclusion: Pulmonary consults were noted for common diagnoses with a high need for escalation in care and procedural interventions, highlighting the importance and appropriateness of specialist consultations. Further studies are needed to explore what triggers an unspecified consult.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) is a low-cost method with minimal risk to the patient that improves the oxygenation of patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19 pneumonia, thereby reducing their need for tracheal intubation (TI) and transferring to the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to overview the results of all previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses to examine the net effect of PP on oxygenation, the rate of TI and mortality in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases from December 2019 through 2022 without publication language restriction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies on PP vs. supine position (SP) in conscious patients with hypoxic respiratory failure COVID-19. After study selection, data were extracted from published meta-analyses and pooled by comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software version 2.2.064 to achieve effect sizes. They were analyzed for TI and mortality rates dichotomous variables, and the results were shown as pooled odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variables such as oxygenation indices (PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2) were also analyzed, and the data were shown as mean differences (MD) with lower and upper CI. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Twelve systematic reviews and meta-analyses with 19,651 patients and six systematic reviews with 2,911 patients were included in this Review of Reviews (total: 22,562). PP treatment significantly reduced the rate of TI (OR = 0.639, %95 CI (0.492, 0.829); P-value = 0.001) and decreased mortality (OR = 0.363, %95 CI (0.240, 0.549), P-value < 0.001). There was no difference in PaO2/FiO2 (MD = 3.591[- 40.881, 48.062]; P-value = 0.874) and SpO2 percent (MD = 1.641[- 4.441, 7.723]; P-value = 0.597). CONCLUSION: Prone positioning can be recommended in conscious ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia to reduce mortality and intubation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022326951. Registered 25 April 2022.