A large-scale outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease, France, as at 28 September 2021.

We report a large-scale outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in France. As at 28 September 2021, 3,403 cases have been reported (47% higher than in 2018-19). We prospectively analysed 210 clinical samples; 190 (90.5%) were enterovirus-positive. Most children presented with atypical HFMD. Coxsackievirus (CV)A6 (49.5%; 94/190) was predominant; no enterovirus A71 was detected. Dermatological and neurological complications of HFMD justify prospective syndromic and virological surveillance for early detection of HFMD outbreaks and identification of associated types.

Infectious Disease Surveillance in the Big Data Era: Towards Faster and Locally Relevant Systems.

While big data have proven immensely useful in fields such as marketing and earth sciences, public health is still relying on more traditional surveillance systems and awaiting the fruits of a big data revolution. A new generation of big data surveillance systems is needed to achieve rapid, flexible, and local tracking of infectious diseases, especially for emerging pathogens. In this opinion piece, we reflect on the long and distinguished history of disease surveillance and discuss recent developments related to use of big data. We start with a brief review of traditional systems relying on clinical and laboratory reports. We then examine how large-volume medical claims data can, with great spatiotemporal resolution, help elucidate local disease patterns. Finally, we review efforts to develop surveillance systems based on digital and social data streams, including the recent rise and fall of Google Flu Trends. We conclude by advocating for increased use of hybrid systems combining information from traditional surveillance and big data sources, which seems the most promising option moving forward. Throughout the article, we use influenza as an exemplar of an emerging and reemerging infection which has traditionally been considered a model system for surveillance and modeling.

Ebola virus disease control in Poland - are we ready for fight?

Despite very low risk assessment, Polish authorities should be prepared for imported EVD cases and be ready to protect public against the spread of Ebolavirus (EBOV). There is the consistent system of infectious diseases surveillance and control in entire country, regulated by law. In Poland the Public Sanitary Inspection has jurisdiction over infectious diseases surveillance. A reporting system functions at three levels. The entire spectrum of viral hemorrhagic fevers is included in the list of 59th notifiable diseases and causative organisms. EVD is regarded as sever, often fatal communicable disease that should be notify promptly. According to Polish legislation EVD cases would be obligatorily isolated in hospital ward. Each potential contact of EVD case should be individually assessed for risk of exposure and categorized for staying under mandatory quarantine or under active monitoring. The governor of each Polish province has established the Epidemic Active Plan and indicated the place for quarantine if needed. The Ministry of Health established the procedures of management of EVD suspected cases and persons in risk to be infected with EBOV in outpatient care. There are prepared separate procedures for dispatcher of emergency medical service, GP's, hospital emergency departments and airports. There are 10 hospitals with division of infectious diseases, with high level isolation units, ready for EVD patient's admission. There is one reference laboratory in Poland in National Institute of Public Health, which performed tests for EBOV detection. The hospitals and outpatient care services and sanitary inspection were evaluated on possession the appropriate PPE for medical staff, in case of direct contact with EVD patient would be needed. Regardless, very law risk for Poland to be affected by EVD outbreak our country is sufficiently prepared for fighting with EBOV infection.

Genotyping of Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains isolated in Japan during 2019 and 2020: spread of p1 gene type 2c and 2j variant strains.

We characterized 118 Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains isolated from three areas of Japan (Saitama, Kanagawa, and Osaka) during the period of 2019 and 2020. Genotyping of the p1 gene in these strains revealed that 29 of them were type 1 lineage (29/118, 24.6%), while 89 were type 2 lineage (89/118, 75.4%), thereby indicating that type 2 lineage was dominant in this period. The most prevalent variant of type 2 lineage was type 2c (57/89, 64%), while the second-most was type 2j, a novel variant identified in this study (30/89, 33.7%). Type 2j p1 is similar to type 2 g p1, but cannot be distinguished from reference type 2 (classical type 2) using the standard polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PCR-RFLP) with HaeIII digestion. Thus, we used MboI digestion in the PCR-RFLP analysis and re-examined the data from previous genotyping studies as well. This revealed that most strains reported as classical type 2 after 2010 in our studies were actually type 2j. The revised genotyping data showed that the type 2c and 2j strains have been spreading in recent years and were the most prevalent variants in Japan during the time-period of 2019 and 2020. We also analyzed the macrolide-resistance (MR) mutations in the 118 strains. MR mutations in the 23S rRNA gene were detected in 29 of these strains (29/118, 24.6%). The MR rate of type 1 lineage (14/29, 48.3%) was still higher than that of type 2 lineage (15/89, 16.9%); however, the MR rate of type 1 lineage was lower than that found in previous reports published in the 2010s, while that of type 2 lineage strains was slightly higher. Thus, there is a need for continuous surveillance of the p1 genotype and MR rate of M. pneumoniae clinical strains, to better understand the epidemiology and variant evolution of this pathogen, although M. pneumoniae pneumonia cases have decreased significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Periodic Genotype Shifts in Clinically Prevalent Mycoplasma pneumoniae Strains in Japan.

Nationwide increases in Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia cases in Japan were reported in 2011, 2012, 2015, and 2016. In this study, we isolated 554 M. pneumoniae strains in 4 areas in Japan (Kanagawa, Okayama, Osaka, and Saitama) between 2006 and 2019, and performed genotyping analysis. More than 80% of the strains isolated in 2011 and 2012 harbored type 1 p1 adhesin gene; however, strains harboring type 2 or its variant p1 gene increased in 2015 and 2016 and dominated after 2017. These findings suggested that a shift in the prevalent genotype of M. pneumoniae clinical strains occurred recently in Japan. More than 90% of the type 1 strains isolated after 2010 harbored macrolide-resistance mutations in their 23S rRNA gene, whereas most type 2 lineage strains had no such mutations. Consequently, the increase in type 2 lineage strains in Japan has reduced the macrolide resistance rate of clinical M. pneumoniae strains. During this analysis, we also identified M. pneumoniae strains carrying a novel variant type 1 p1 gene, and we classified it as type 1b. We then sequenced the genomes of 81 selected M. pneumoniae strains that we collected between 1976 and 2017 in Japan, and compared them with 156 M. pneumoniae genomes deposited in public databases to provide insights into the interpretation of M. pneumoniae genotyping methods, including p1 typing, multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), and typing by 8 single-nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNP-8). As expected, p1 typing, MLST, and SNP-8 results exhibited good correlation with whole-genome SNP analysis results in terms of phylogenetic relationships; however, MLVA typing results were less comparable to those of the other methods. MLVA may be useful for the discrimination of strains derived from a single outbreak within a limited area; however, is not reliable for classification of strains collected from distantly separated areas at different time points. This study showed the usefulness of genome-based comparison of M. pneumoniae for molecular epidemiology. Genome sequencing of more strains will improve our understanding of global propagation routes of this pathogen and evolutionary aspects of M. pneumoniae strains.

Control of Infectious Diseases in the Era of European Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Consolidation: New Challenges and Opportunities for the Patient and for Public Health Surveillance.

Many new innovative diagnostic approaches have been made available during the last 10 years with major impact on patient care and public health surveillance. In parallel, to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the clinical microbiology laboratories (CMLs), European laboratory professionals have streamlined their organization leading to amalgamation of activities and restructuring of their professional relationships with clinicians and public health specialists. Through this consolidation process, an operational model has emerged that combines large centralized clinical laboratories performing most tests on one high-throughput analytical platform connected to several distal laboratories dealing locally with urgent analyses at near point of care. The centralization of diagnostic services over a large geographical region has given rise to the concept of regional-scale "microbiology laboratories network." Although the volume-driven cost savings associated with such laboratory networks seem self-evident, the consequence(s) for the quality of patient care and infectious disease surveillance and control remain less obvious. In this article, we describe the range of opportunities that the changing landscape of CMLs in Europe can contribute toward improving the quality of patient care but also the early detection and enhanced surveillance of public health threats caused by infectious diseases. The success of this transformation of health services is reliant on the appropriate preparation in terms of staff, skills, and processes that would be inclusive of stakeholders. In addition, rigorous metrics are needed to set out more concrete laboratory service performance objectives and assess the expected benefits to society in terms of saving lives and preventing diseases.

Epidemiology of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections in Japan and Therapeutic Strategies for Macrolide-Resistant M. pneumoniae.

Pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae pneumonia) is a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia worldwide. The surveillance of M. pneumoniae pneumonia is important for etiological and epidemiological studies of acute respiratory infections. In Japan, nation-wide surveillance of M. pneumoniae pneumonia has been conducted as a part of the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID) program. This surveillance started in 1981, and significant increases in the numbers of M. pneumoniae pneumonia patients were noted in 1984, 1988, 2006, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2015. The epidemics in 2011 and 2012 were particularly widespread and motivated researchers to conduct detailed epidemiological studies, including genotyping and drug resistance analyses of M. pneumoniae isolates. The genotyping studies based on the p1 gene sequence suggested that the p1 gene type 1 lineage has been dominant in Japan since 2003, including the epidemic period during 2011-2012. However, more detailed p1 typing analysis is required to determine whether the type 2 lineages become more relevant after the dominance of the type 1 lineage. There has been extensive research interest in implications of the p1 gene types on the epidemiology of M. pneumoniae infections. Serological characterizations of sera from patients have provided a glimpse into these associations, showing the presence of type specific antibody in the patient sera. Another important epidemiological issue of M. pneumoniae pneumonia is the emergence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae (MRMP). MRMPs were noted among clinical isolates in Japan after 2000. At present, the isolation rate of MRMPs from pediatric patients is estimated at 50-90% in Japan, depending on the specific location. In view of the situation, Japanese societies have issued guiding principles for treating M. pneumoniae pneumonia. In these guiding principles, macrolides are still recommended as the first-line drug, however, if the fever does not subside in 48-72 h from first-line drug administration, a change of antibiotics to second-line drugs is recommended.