Complications, Visual Acuity, and Refractive Error 3 Years after Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation for Pediatric Aphakia.

PURPOSE: To report the cumulative incidence of complications and to describe refractive error and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in children undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after previous surgery for nontraumatic cataract. DESIGN: Pediatric cataract registry. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty children (108 eyes: 60 bilateral, 48 unilateral) undergoing lensectomy at younger than 13 years of age. METHODS: Annual data collection from medical record review through 5 years after lensectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative incidence of newly emergent complications after secondary IOL implantation; refractive error and VA by 5 years after lensectomy. RESULTS: Median follow-up after secondary IOL implantation was 2.7 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.8-3.3 years; range, 0.6-5.0 years) for bilateral and 2.1 years (range, 0.5-6.4 years) for unilateral cases. A common complication after secondary IOL implantation was a glaucoma-related adverse event (GRAE; glaucoma or glaucoma suspect); the cumulative incidence was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3%-29%) in bilateral cases and 12% (95% CI, 0%-23%) in unilateral cases. The cumulative incidence of surgery for visual axis opacification was 2% (95% CI, 0%-7%) for bilateral cases and 4% (95% CI, 0%-10%) for unilateral cases. The median prediction error within 90 days of implantation was 0.88 diopter (D; IQR, -0.50 to +3.00 D) less hyperopic than intended among 21 eyes for bilateral cases and 1.50 D (IQR, -0.25 to +2.38 D) less among 19 unilateral cases. The median spherical equivalent refractive error at 5 years (at a median of 5.1 years of age) in eyes receiving a secondary IOL was +0.50 D (IQR, -2.38 to +2.94 D) for 48 bilateral cases and +0.06 D (IQR, -2.25 to +0.75 D) for 22 unilateral cases. Median monocular VA at 5 years was 20/63 (IQR, 20/50-20/100) for bilateral cases (n = 42) and 20/400 (IQR, 20/160-20/800) for unilateral cases (n = 33). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with secondary IOL implantation have a risk of developing new GRAEs. Five years after lensectomy (approximately 2.5 years after secondary IOL implantation), the average refractive error was less hyperopic than desired given the anticipated further myopic shift before refraction stabilizes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae for the Yamane technique of secondary fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the refractive outcomes of the Yamane technique for intrascleral fixation of intraocular lenses (SF-IOL) and compare the predictive ability of the various intraocular lens power calculation formulae commonly used in conjunction with the technique. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from January 2014 to May 2023. Studies that met the predetermined inclusion criteria were included and subjected to analysis. The primary outcome evaluated was the refractive predictive error, defined as the difference between predicted refraction and post-operative manifest refraction. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, with a cumulative sample size of 615 patients (mean age: 66.6 years). Various IOL formulae were used, with SRK/T being the most frequently adopted formula. The overall mean refractive predictive error for all formulae combined was -0.02 D, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.99). Subgroup analysis for individual formulae also showed no significant difference from predicted error for any formula (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Yamane technique for SF-IOL shows promising refractive outcomes, and the choice of IOL power calculation formula should be tailored based on patient characteristics and surgeon preference. No formula demonstrated superior predictive ability over others. Further research is needed to develop formulae specifically for eyes with secondary aphakia and poor capsular support.

Correlation between pupillary size and depth of focus after the implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether depth of focus after the implantation of extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) correlates with pupillary size. METHODS: This retrospective case series study evaluated eyes undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of EDoF IOLs. At least one month postoperatively, the depth of focus (DoF) was measured to determine the correlation with pupillary size, age, anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AXL), and corneal spherical aberrations (SA). RESULTS: The study evaluated 64 eyes of 49 patients. The mean depth of focus was 2.67 diopters (D). The mean preoperative photopic pupil size was 3.36 mm. A significant negative association was found between preoperative photopic pupil size and depth of focus (r = 0.30, Pearson's correlation coefficient) and between preoperative mesopic pupil size and depth of focus (r = 0.274, Pearson's correlation coefficient).

Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. RESULTS: Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). CONCLUSIONS: For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.

Comparatively analysing the postoperative optical performance of different intraocular lenses: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative performance, including best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and optical metrics (from the OQAS and iTrace devices), was compared among 4 different intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: This prospective observational study included 104 eyes from 104 subjects who underwent cataract surgery combined with implantation of 4 different IOLs: monofocal (Mon) IOLs, segmental refractive (SegRef) IOLs, diffractive (Dif) IOLs and extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs. Postoperative BCDVA and optical metrics were collected at the 6th month. The OQAS optical metrics included the objective scattering index (OSI), Strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency, and predicted visual acuity (PVA); the iTrace optical metrics included blur/double vision, glare/halo, starburst, mixed focus, night myopia, and night hyperopia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in BCDVA among the 4 groups (P = 0.059; power = 70.3%). Differences were observed in all OQAS optical metrics among the groups (all P < 0.001). Overall, Mon IOLs and EDoF IOLs exhibited better performance than Dif IOLs and SegRef IOLs. Starburst was the only iTrace optical metric that differed among the groups (P < 0.001): SegRef IOLs caused more starbursts than Mon IOLs (P = 0.001), Dif IOLs (P = 0.006) and EDoF IOLs (P < 0.001). Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships among the iTrace optical metrics, OQAS optical metrics and BCDVA: starburst was negatively correlated with BCDVA, PVA at contrasts of 100% and 20%, OSI, and MTF cut-off frequency (all P ≤ 0.001); mixed focus was positively correlated with BCDVA, PVA at contrasts of 100% and 20%, OSI, and MTF cut-off frequency (all P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative BCDVA and optical metrics varied among the different IOLs, which should be taken into account in the selection and management of IOLs for cataract patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Ethical Review Board (No. 50 2022).

Evaluating keratometry and corneal astigmatism data from biometers and anterior segment tomographers and mapping to reconstructed corneal astigmatism.

BACKGROUND: To compare results from different corneal astigmatism measurement instruments; to reconstruct corneal astigmatism from the postimplantation spectacle refraction and toric intraocular lens (IOL) power; and to derive models for mapping measured corneal astigmatism to reconstructed corneal astigmatism. METHODS: Retrospective single centre study involving 150 eyes treated with a toric IOL (Alcon SN6AT, DFT or TFNT). Measurements included IOLMaster 700 keratometry (IOLMK) and total keratometry (IOLMTK), Pentacam keratometry (PK) and total corneal refractive power in 3 and 4 mm zones (PTCRP3 and PTCRP4), and Aladdin keratometry (AK). Regression-based models mapping the measured C0 and C45 components (Alpin's method) to reconstructed corneal astigmatism were derived. RESULTS: Mean C0 components were 0.50/0.59/0.51 dioptres (D) for IOLMK/PK/AK; 0.2/0.26/0.31 D for IOLMTK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4; and 0.26 D for reconstructed corneal astigmatism. All corresponding C45 components ranged around 0. The prediction models had main diagonal elements lower than 1 with some crosstalk between C0 and C45 (nonzero off-diagonal elements). Root-mean-squared residuals were 0.44/0.45/0.48/0.51/0.50/0.47 D for IOLMK/IOLMTK/PK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4/AK. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the different modalities are not consistent. On average IOLMTK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4 match reconstructed corneal astigmatism, whereas IOLMK/PK/AK show systematic C0 offsets of around 0.25 D. IOLMTK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4. Prediction models can reduce but not fully eliminate residual astigmatism after toric IOL implantation.

Determination of progressive endothelial cell loss after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.

Comments about endothelial cell loss after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens are provided, with a particular emphasis on the importance of determining progressive postoperative cell density reduction, excluding that related to surgical trauma.

[Outcomes of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implantation]. / Rezul'tat implantatsii intraokulyarnykh linz s rasshirennoi glubinoi fokusa.

Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the latest IOL designs. In recent years, several models of EDOF IOLs have become available in Russia, two of which (Tecnis Symfony and Acrysof IQ Vivity) are implanted in our clinic. Comparative studies devoted to the results of implantation of the new EDOF IOLs are rare in the available literature. PURPOSE: This article compares the outcomes of implantation of two EDOF IOLs in patients with presbyopia and/or cataract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective study included 60 patients (81 eyes) after implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony (32 patients, 45 eyes; group 1) or EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity (28 patients, 36 eyes; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 3.9±1.3 months. RESULTS: All groups showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time compared to preoperative values. In group 1, the best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) increased from 0.61±0.10 to 0.82±0.16 at the maximum follow-up time, and in group 2 - from 0.58±0.08 to 0.67±0.12 (p>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in best corrected intermediate and distance visual acuity (BCIVA and BCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time. The increase in the indicator compared to the preoperative period was not significant in both groups (p>0.05). The frequency of side optical phenomena was low in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study presents a comparative analysis of the results of implantation of two different EDOF IOLs. Both lenses were comparable in most of the studied parameters, including providing good distance and intermediate vision, functional near vision, as well as a low frequency of side optical phenomena. In all cases the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical intervention.

Influence of a multifocal intraocular lens centration and eye angles on light distortion and ocular scatter index.

PURPOSE: To assess how eye axes and multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) centration may impact the light distortion index (LDI) and ocular scatter index (OSI). METHODS: Fifty-eight subjects implanted with the trifocal MIOL Q-Flex M 640PM or Liberty 677MY (Medicontur) were included in this retrospective analysis. The following variables were collected with the Pentacam Wave (Oculus) considering the vertex normal as the coordinates center: chord-mu to the center of the pupil, chord-alpha to the geometrical center of the cornea, and chord-MIOL to the center of the diffractive ring. These measurements were correlated with OSI (HD Analyzer, Visiometrics) and LDI (light distortion analyzer, CEORLab). RESULTS: Chord-MIOL centroid was 0.12 mm at 62°, chord-mu was 0.09 mm at 174°, and chord-alpha was 0.38 mm at 188°. A relationship was found between OSI and LDI, rho = 0.58, p < 0.0005). No relationships were found between chord-mu or chord-alpha and the LDI or OSI, neither for the total magnitude, nor the decomposition in orthogonal components (p > 0.05). The LDI was significantly correlated with the temporal centration of the MIOL versus the vertex normal (rho = 0.32, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As opposed to what has been previously described, the temporal centration of the MIOL was related to a decrease in the LDI. Future studies with extreme values of the included variables are required to establish cut-offs for considering these variables as exclusion criteria in the implantation of a MIOL.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses - a narrative review.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It's advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There's a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery.

Managing low corneal astigmatism in patients with presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses: a narrative review.

Cataract surgery has become a refractive procedure in which emmetropia is the goal, with the implantation of extended depth-of-focus or multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) being the commonly selected option to restore vision beyond the far distance. The selection criteria for implanting these lenses can differ from those for monofocal IOLs and even between technologies, as eye characteristics can affect postoperative visual performance. Corneal astigmatism is an eye characteristic that can affect visual performance differently, depending on the implanted IOL. The magnitude of corneal astigmatism, the tolerance of the IOL to this astigmatism, economic aspects, comorbidities, and the efficacy of astigmatism treatment are factors that can make surgeons' doubt as to what astigmatism treatment should be applied to each patient. This review aims to summarize the current evidence related to low astigmatism tolerance in presbyopia-correcting lenses, the efficacy achieved through corneal incisions, and their comparison with the implantation of toric IOLs.

Application of the suture needle retrograde threading method in scleral fixation of intraocular lenses.

BACKGROUND: Here we described a new threading technique for the universal fixation of any posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients whose surgery done by Surgeon A with the needle-guided method or the suture needle retrograde threading (SNRT) method for intrascleral IOL fixation were enrolled in the first group. Thirty-four eyes of 34 patients whose surgery done by Surgeon A, Surgeon B or Surgeon C with the SNRT method for intrascleral IOL fixation were grouped into three sub-groups by surgeon. Information regarding age, sex, best-available visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), past ophthalmological history, threading time (from puncturing to externalizing suture) and complications during and after the surgery were gathered. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the threading time was less in the SNRT group than needle-guided group by Surgeon A. There was one eye with suture needle slipping from the guide needle when guiding out of the eye. The threading procedure was completed one time without suture ruptures or loop slippage in the SNRT group operated by Surgeon A. And using the SNRT method, Surgeon A, Surgeon B, and Surgeon C did not show any significant difference in threading time. No complications (e.g., vitreous hemorrhage, hyphemia, retinal detachment, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, or hypotony) were observed during surgery or postoperatively in all cases. No leakage occurred at the site of the puncture after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique appears to be a safe, simple, easy-to-learn, and universal surgical method, which is suitable for various types of IOLs.

Exploring the Potential of Nanoporous Materials for Advancing Ophthalmic Treatments.

The landscape of ophthalmology is undergoing significant transformations, driven by technological advancements and innovations in materials science. One of the advancements in this evolution is the application of nanoporous materials, endowed with unique physicochemical properties ideal for a variety of ophthalmological applications. Characterized by their high surface area, tunable porosity, and functional versatility, these materials have the potential to improve drug delivery systems and ocular devices. This review, anchored by a comprehensive literature focusing on studies published within the last five years, examines the applications of nanoporous materials in ocular drug delivery systems (DDS), contact lenses, and intraocular lenses. By consolidating the most current research, this review aims to serve as a resource for clinicians, researchers, and material scientists engaged in the rapidly evolving field of ophthalmology.

Refractive outcomes of scleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses in post-traumatic eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes of scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus in post-traumatic eyes using SRK/T formula. METHODS: This single-center retrospective case series included 35 eyes from 35 post-traumatic patients undergoing scleral-suture of ErgomaX IOLs by a single experienced surgeon. Preoperative predicted refraction, procedure-related complications, and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at least 1 month after surgery were recorded. The prediction error (PE) was calculated as the difference between the postoperative SE and preoperative predicted refraction. RESULTS: Of the 35 post-traumatic patients, 28 patients were aphakia without capsular support, and 7 patients were traumatic lens dislocation or subluxation. The mean age at surgery was 56.03 ± 14.56 years and 28 patients were men (80%). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and postoperative astigmatism were - 1.23 ± 0.82 D and 1.57 ± 1.14 D, respectively. The mean prediction error (ME) of SRK/T formula was - 0.17 D. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.48D. The prediction accuracy was 60.0% for refractive errors of ± 0.50 D and 85.7% for refractive errors of ± 1.00D. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that IOL power has positive correlation with PE. CONCLUSION: Assumption of in-the-bag IOL position when calculating IOL (52501TY, ErgomaX) power for standardizing scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus demonstrates acceptable refractive outcomes. The accuracy of IOL power calculation using the SRK/T formula for eyes needing low IOL power or high IOL power may be affected by the uncertain position of postoperative IOL and further studies are needed.

Phakic iris-claw intraocular lens: calculations of power and long-term endothelial cells loss.

A correction about phakic intraocular lens power calculation process, as it was stated by Li, Song & Song, is provided. It is explained that this calculation is based on the Van der Heijde formula and not on biometric formulas. A comment about the mechanisms of late endothelial cell loss following phakic intraocular lenses is done.

[Preclinical Image Quality Evaluation of Simultaneous Vision Intraocular Lenses].

Three different preclinical evaluation methods of MTF through-frequency response, MTF through-focus-response and expected visual acuity were used to compare and analyze the imaging differences of IOLs with four different optical designs. The research work could be used in the simultaneous vision IOLs in the optical design stage and verify the optical quality of the IOLs, the results can predict the visual representation of the patients better. The evaluation results can provide reference for IOL manufacturers and users in product design, development, validation and application selection.

Comparison of visual outcomes after two types of mix-and-match implanted trifocal extended-depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes between two types of mix-and-match implanted trifocal extended-depth-of-focus (EDoF) and trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: A total of 212 eyes of 106 subjects with mix-and-match implanted FineVision Triumf and FineVision HP IOLs (Triumf-HP group) and 212 eyes of 106 subjects with mix-and-match implanted Zeiss AT LARA and AT LISA IOLs (AT LARA-LISA group) were enrolled in this retrospective case-control study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and binocular distance-corrected defocus curves were measured between 6 and 10 weeks after cataract surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in UDVA among the four IOLs. UNVA was the best in eyes with the FineVision HP IOL (0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR), followed by eyes with the AT LISA IOL (0.07 ± 0.07 logMAR), the FineVision Triumf IOL (0.09 ± 0.09 logMAR), and the AT LARA IOL (0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR), respectively. The AT LARA-LISA group had better visual acuity than the Triumf-HP group between - 1.00 D and - 1.50 D of defocus, and the Triumf-HP group had better visual acuity than the AT LARA-LISA group between - 3.00 D and - 4.00 D of defocus. CONCLUSION: Mix-and-match implantation of trifocal EDoF and trifocal IOLs provided good visual outcomes in far, intermediate, and near distances. The mix-and-match implantation of Triumf-HP IOLs led to better visual outcomes in near vision, while that of the AT LARA-LISA IOLs led to better visual outcomes in intermediate vision.

A critical evaluation of longitudinal changes of astigmatism following implantation of toric implantable collamer lens (TICL): a comparison between treated and untreated cases over 4 years.

PURPOSE: To evaluate residual astigmatism following correction with toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) (group I) over a period of 4 years and compare with the change of astigmatism in spectacle wearers (group II). METHODS: Groups I (86 cases implanted with TICL [EVO + Visian ICL, Staar Surgical, Nidau, Switzeland], preop refractive error [sphere and cylinder] - 22.25 DS to - 1.00 DS and - 5.50 DC to - 1.00 DC) and II (80 cases initial refractive error [sphere and cylinder] - 18.00 DS to 0.00 DS and - 7.00 DC to - 1.00 DC) were reviewed annually. Refractive and tomography data were subjected to vector analysis to determine surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), angle of error [Δθ° = angle of target-induced astigmatism (TIA) - angle of SIA], and ΔC [TIA-SIA powers] and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in group I and induced change in astigmatism (ICA) in group II. RESULTS: In group I, on all occasions, SIA correlated with TIA (p < 0.05); differences between SIA and TIA means were insignificant and changes in TCA were not correlated with ΔC. Mean (± sd, 95% CI) residual astigmatic powers (RA) in attending group I cases (1-4 years) were - 0.40 DC (0.58, - 0.52 to - 0.28), - 0.40 DC (0.59, - 0.52 to - 0.27), - 0.41 DC (0.58, - 0.54 to - 0.28), and - 0.61 DC (0.74, - 0.82 to - 0.40). In group II, the corresponding ICA powers were - 0.47 DC (0.53, - 0.61 to - 0.32), - 0.49 DC (0.48, - 0.69 to - 0.29), - 0.60 DC (0.40, - 0.76 to - 0.44), and - 0.86 DC (0.71, - 1.19 to - 0.52). Differences between RA and ICA were not significant. Of the group I cases presenting at 1-4 years postop, 23, 18, 16, and 28 had RA powers ≤ - 0.75 DC. Of these 12, 10, 6, and 16 were associated with Δθ° > 5° (ΔC - 0.50 to 0 DC) and 5, 1, 4, and 4 were related to ΔC (Δθ° < 5°). CONCLUSION: The development of astigmatism after TICL implantation is on par with the natural change in astigmatism in untreated cases. In about 50% of TICL cases presenting with astigmatism ≤ - 0.75 DC, the residual astigmatism could be neutralized by realigning the TICL.

Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) for the correction of presbyopia and to assess patient satisfaction. METHODS: Records from three centres were reviewed to select presbyopic patients having undergone bilateral refractive lens exchange and implantation of the AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL. Postoperatively, monocular and binocular distance, intermediate and near visual acuities, corrected and uncorrected, and subjective refraction were measured. Patients also completed a quality of life questionnaire. Safety evaluation included IOL stability and postoperative complications. RESULTS: 72 eyes (36 patients) were analysed. No clinically significant difference between pre- and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was found for monocular or binocular measurements. Mean postoperative monocular CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 logMAR. Mean refractive values all improved statistically significantly compared with preoperative baseline (p ≤ 0.0064). Overall, 82.4% of eyes had spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 D and 97.1% within ± 1.0 D of emmetropia with a mean accuracy of -0.10 ± 0.41 D. Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate and near visual acuity was 87.5%, 84.4% and 78.1% respectively, and 78.1% of patients were satisfied with their postoperative, spectacle-free vision. Eight eyes received Nd:YAG laser treatment. No other IOL-related safety issues were reported. CONCLUSION: AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL bilaterally implanted in presbyopic patients provided excellent distance, intermediate and near visual outcomes with very accurate correction of refraction. These results were associated with a high level of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under the identification NCT03790592 (31/12/2018).

Influence of angle alpha on visual quality after implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.

BACKGROUND: To assess postoperative changes in angle alpha, and to evaluate the postoperative visual quality of patients with different angle alpha values after implantation of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: Seventy-nine eyes of 79 patients who had phacoemulsification with EDOF IOLs implantation were enrolled. A cut-off value of 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, and 0.5 mm in preoperative angle alpha was chosen to divide eyes into groups. Distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities, modulation transfer function (MTF), and aberrations were recorded during a 6-month follow-up. A patient questionnaire was completed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in angle alpha postoperatively compared to preoperatively. No significant differences were found in visual acuity and MTF between all groups. With 5 mm pupil diameter, there were significant differences of higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration in ocular aberration and internal aberration between angle alpha<0.4 mm and angle alpha≥0.4 mm. Additionally, significant differences of coma were also added in cut-off value of 0.5 mm. When the value of angle alpha is 0.4 mm or higher, there were significant differences in the score of halos and glare. CONCLUSIONS: Angle alpha did not affect visual acuity, but the value of 0.4 mm or higher in angle alpha affected the visual quality under scotopic conditions and occurrence of halos and glare. For patients with 0.4 mm or higher in angle alpha, the choice to implant a EDOF IOL should be carefully considered.