Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes for Labral Tears are Comparable to Advanced Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence on outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who have symptomatic degenerative labral tears and mild to moderate osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if outcomes of primary THA in the setting of painful, symptomatic labral tear, and mild to moderate arthritic changes (MMOA) were comparable to outcomes of primary THA performed for severe arthritic changes (AOA). Primary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes (PRO) scores. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and perioperative complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective investigation of all THAs between January 2018 and July 2022. There were 111 patients who had THA due to failure of non-operative treatment of a degenerative labral tear without advanced arthritic changes (MMOA cohort, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Grades 1 to 3). These patients were matched to 111 patients who underwent THA for advanced OA (AOA cohort, KL Grade 4). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The average age for the labral tear cohort was 59 years, with 50.6% women, compared to 70 years (P < 0.001), and 49.4% women (P = 0.93) in the advanced OA cohort. RESULTS: There were no differences in preoperative PROs, complications, or length of stay (LOS) between groups. When looking at postoperative PROs between cohorts, the labral tear cohort had less improvement in WOMAC-S (24.3 versus 34.0, P = 0.005) and WOMAC-F (26.3 versus 36.0, P = 0.005) at 12 months and greater improvement in WOMAC-P at 12 months (38.3 versus 34.7, P = 0.04). The SF12-P scores were significantly higher among the labral tear cohort compared to the AOA cohort at 12 months (48.5 versus 47.8, P < 0.001). The SF12-M scores were significantly higher in the AOA cohort compared to the labral tear cohort at 3 months (47.1 versus 47.4, P = 0.02) and 12 months (46.7 versus 47.6, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the change in WOMAC-P at 12 months was significantly better for labral tear patients (OR [odds ratio] 7.5 versus, P = 0.008, CI (confidence interval) [6.85 to 8.14]). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients who have symptomatic degenerative labral tears with mild to moderate arthritic changes have comparable outcomes to patients who have advanced OA following primary THA. Given suboptimal outcomes with hip arthroscopy for labral tear in the setting of early arthritis, primary THA can be a reasonable treatment modality for patients failing non-operative treatments.

The Otto Aufranc Award: Does Hip Arthroscopy at the Time of Periacetabular Osteotomy Improve the Clinical Outcome for the Treatment of Hip Dysplasia? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: A periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is often sufficient to treat the symptoms and improve quality of life for symptomatic hip dysplasia. However, acetabular cartilage and labral pathologies are very commonly present, and there is a lack of evidence examining the benefits of adjunct arthroscopy to treat these. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients undergoing PAO with and without arthroscopy, with the primary end point being the International Hip Outcome Tool-33 at 1 year. METHODS: In a multicenter study, 203 patients who had symptomatic hip dysplasia were randomized: 97 patients undergoing an isolated PAO (mean age 27 years [range, 16 to 44]; mean body mass index of 25.1 [range, 18.3 to 37.2]; 86% women) and 91 patients undergoing PAO who had an arthroscopy (mean age 27 years [range, 16 to 49]; mean body mass index of 25.1 [17.5 to 25.1]; 90% women). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 1 to 5), all patients exhibited improvements in their functional score, with no significant differences between PAO plus arthroscopy versus PAO alone at 12 months postsurgery on all scores: preoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-33 score of 31.2 (standard deviation [SD] 16.0) versus 36.4 (SD 15.9), and 12 months postoperative score of 72.4 (SD 23.4) versus 73.7 (SD 22.6). The preoperative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome pain score was 60.3 (SD 19.6) versus 66.1 (SD 20.0) and 12 months postoperative 88.2 (SD 15.8) versus 88.4 (SD 18.3). The mean preoperative physical health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score was 42.5 (SD 8.0) versus 44.2 (SD 8.8) and 12 months postoperative 48.7 (SD 8.5) versus 52.0 (SD 10.6). There were 4 patients with PAO without arthroscopy who required an arthroscopy later to resolve persistent symptoms, and 1 patient from the PAO plus arthroscopy group required an additional arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial has failed to show any significant clinical benefit in performing hip arthroscopy at the time of the PAO at 1-year follow-up. Longer follow-up will be required to determine if hip arthroscopy provides added value to a PAO for symptomatic hip dysplasia.

Accuracy of MR arthrography in the detection of posterior glenoid labral injuries of the shoulder.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of MR arthrography in detecting isolated posterior glenoid labral injuries using arthroscopy as the reference standard. METHODS: MR arthrograms of 97 patients with isolated posterior glenoid labral tears by arthroscopy and those of 96 age and gender-matched controls with intact posterior labra were reviewed by two blinded radiologists for the presence and location of posterior labral abnormalities. The sensitivity and specificity of detection of posterior labral tears were calculated as well as the prevalence of associated pathologies. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, history and direction of shoulder instability, and prior surgery. RESULTS: Posterior labral pathology was detected by MR arthrography with sensitivities of 76% and 84% for readers 1 and 2, and a specificity of 88% for both readers. Kappa value for interreader agreement was 0.91. Twenty-two of twenty-three (96%) tears isolated to the posteroinferior quadrant on arthroscopy were correctly identified on MRI. Commonly associated pathologies included paralabral cyst (38%), humeral fracture (7%), and glenoid fracture (2%). Fifteen of ninety-seven (16%) patients with posterior tears on both arthroscopy and MRI had glenoid rim deficiency on imaging versus no patients with intact posterior labra (p < 0.001). Forty of ninety-seven (41%) patients with posterior tears on arthroscopy had a history of posterior instability versus none without posterior tears. There was no significant difference in tear length on MRI between those with a history of instability and those without (p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: MR arthrography is accurate in detecting posterior glenoid labroligamentous injuries.

Patients aged 50-75 years take longer to achieve the patient acceptable symptom state than patients aged 20-34 years following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: Though an increasing number of adults older than 50 years are undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS), it is unclear how their timeline for functional outcome improvement compares to that of younger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age on time to achieving the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) following primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. METHODS: A retrospective comparative single-surgeon cohort study of primary hip arthroscopy patients with minimum 2-year follow-up was conducted. Age categories were 20-34 years, 35-49 years, and 50-75 years. All subjects completed the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) prior to surgery and at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. MCID and SCB cutoffs were defined as pre-to-postoperative increases in mHHS by ≥ 8.2 and ≥ 19.8, respectively. PASS cutoff was set at postoperative mHHS ≥ 74. Time to achievement of each milestone was compared using interval-censored survival analysis. The effect of age was adjusted for Body Mass Index (BMI), sex, and labral repair technique using an interval-censored proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients were included in the analysis with 115 (40.4%) aged 20-34 years, 92 (32.3%) aged 35-49 years, and 78 (27.4%) aged 50-75 years. There were no significant differences between groups in time to achievement for the MCID (n.s.) or SCB (n.s.). However, patients in the oldest group had significantly longer time to PASS than those in the youngest group, both in the unadjusted analysis (p = 0.02) and after adjusting for BMI, sex, and labral repair technique (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Achievement of the PASS, but not the MCID or SCB, is delayed among FAIS patients aged 50-75 years who undergo primary hip arthroscopy compared to those aged 20-34 years. Older FAIS patients should be counseled appropriately about their longer timeline to achieving hip function comparable to their younger counterparts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Acetabular labral tear is associated with high pelvic incidence with or without femoroacetabular impingement morphology.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic sagittal parameters and acetabular labral tears. METHODS: Three-hundred and sixty-five patients (449 hips) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) for hip pain were enrolled in this study. Pelvic sagittal parameters, including the pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope, were measured with a standing lumbosacral lateral radiograph. All subjects were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of radiologic acetabular labral tears and compared. Furthermore, the two groups were divided into subgroups according to whether femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) morphology was present or not and compared. RESULTS: Pelvic incidence was greater in the labral tear group than in the non-labral tear group (52.3° ± 8.2° versus 47.1° ± 6.8°, p < 0.001). After accounting for potentially confounding variables, we found that higher age (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.06, p = 0.001), FAI (odds ratio 15.11, 95% CI 7.43 to 30.75, p < 0.001), and high pelvic incidence (odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.17, p < 0.001) were independently associated with acetabular labral tear. When only the patients without FAI (308 hips) were divided into groups with and without acetabular labral tear, we found that higher age (odds ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06, p = 0.008) and high pelvic incidence (odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.19, p < 0.001) were independently associated with acetabular labral tear. CONCLUSION: Acetabular labral tear is associated with high pelvic incidence with or without FAI morphology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Return to play following nonsurgical management of superior labrum anterior-posterior tears: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are common shoulder injuries, especially in overhead athletes. Often, initial management of these injuries is nonsurgical with focused rehabilitation. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the outcomes of nonsurgical management of SLAP tears in athletes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed for articles published before March 2021 using key search terms pertaining to clinical studies evaluating the nonsurgical treatment of SLAP tears in adult patients published in English-language literature. Abstracts and manuscripts were independently reviewed by 2 co-authors to determine eligibility. Return-to-play rate and return-to-prior-athletic-performance rate were determined by combining results across studies. RESULTS: Five articles met the inclusion criteria. There were 244 total athletes (162 elite or higher-level athletes). The mean ages ranged from 20.3 to 38.0 years. Type II SLAP tears were most common; baseball, softball, and weightlifting were the most common sports involved. The return-to-play rate was 53.7% in all athletes and 52.5% in elite or higher-level athletes. In athletes who were able to complete their nonoperative rehabilitation program, the return-to-play rate was 78% in all athletes and 76.6% in elite or higher-level athletes. The overall rate of return to prior performance was 42.6%, which increased to 72% for those athletes who were able to complete their rehabilitation. Patients who discontinued the rehabilitation protocol in favor of surgery had an average of 8 physical therapy sessions compared with 20 sessions for patients with successful nonoperative treatment. The timing of return to play was generally less than 6 months in studies that reported it. Patient-reported outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and visual analog scale, all improved significantly after nonsurgical treatment. Factors associated with failure of nonsurgical management included older age, participation in overhead sports (especially baseball pitchers), traumatic injury, positive compression rotation test, concomitant rotator cuff injury, longer baseball career, longer symptomatic period, and the presence of a Bennett spur. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nonoperative treatment of SLAP tears in athletes can be successful, especially in the subset of patients who are able to complete their rehabilitation program before attempting a return to play. Although nonoperative treatment should be considered the first line of treatment for most SLAP tears, there are some factors that may be associated with failure of conservative treatment; therefore, further high level, prospective studies would be beneficial to identify those athletes most likely to respond favorably to nonoperative treatment.

Elevated levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6 in the synovial tissue of patients with labral tear: a comparative study with hip osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Labral tear can be the initiating factor in the onset of hip osteoarthritis (HOA). However, the physiopathology of labral tear is not fully understood. Our aim was to compare synovial tissue inflammatory cytokine levels between patients with labral tear and late-stage HOA. METHODS: Synovial tissue from sites showing the greatest inflammation was harvested from 106 hips from 100 subjects during hip surgery. RNA was extracted, and levels of TNFA, IL1B, IL6 and COX2 mRNA were compared among all patients using real-time PCR. Additionally, we examined whether femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) was associated with elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines in patients with labral tear. To analyze the effects of TNF-α on inflammatory mediators in hip synovial tissue, synovial fibroblasts were extracted from hip synovial tissue of patients with labral tear and late-stage HOA (n = 5 each). Mononuclear cells were extracted from synovial tissue, cultured for 7 days, and stimulated with control or 10 ng/mL human recombinant TNF-α for 1 day. mRNA was extracted from stimulated cells and IL1B, IL6, and COX2 levels were determined using real-time PCR. RESULTS: TNFA, IL1B, and COX2 expression in synovial tissue were significantly higher in patients with labral tear than late-stage HOA (TNFA, p <  0.001; IL1B, p <  0.001; COX2, p = 0.001). There were no differences in expression between patients with labral tear with and without FAI (TNFA, p = 0.546; IL1B, p = 0.559; IL6, p = 0.599; COX2, p = 0.124). Compared to vehicle control, TNF-α stimulation significantly elevated IL1B, IL6, and COX2 expression in synovial fibroblasts collected from patients with labral tear and late-stage HOA (IL1B, p = 0.043 and p = 0.043; IL6, p = 0.043 and 0.043; COX2, p = 0.043 and p = 0.080, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: TNFA, IL1B, and COX2 expression were elevated in the synovial tissue of patients with labral tear. Further investigations are needed to reveal the relationship between inflammatory cytokine levels and various aspects of labral tear pathology, including pain and the onset and progression of OA.

Comparison of 2D, 3D, and radially reformatted MR images in the detection of labral tears and acetabular cartilage injury in young patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of two-dimensional high-resolution (2D), 3-dimensional with multiplanar reconstruction (3D MPR), and radially reformatted (RR) MRIs when evaluating the complexities of the hip joint in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We hypothesized RR would be superior in detecting labral pathology and 2D would be superior in detecting transition zone and acetabular cartilage injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2D, 3D MPR, and RR MRIs of 33 patients, who later underwent surgical treatment for FAI, were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Bland-Altman methods were used to estimate agreement between each method and the gold-standard, arthroscopic visualization of the hip joint, regarding the percentage of the hip joint affected by each injury type. RESULTS: 3D MPR and RR groupings were associated with the highest sensitivity and accuracy for labral injury. 3D MPR demonstrated the smallest bias in assessing the percentage of joint affected by labral injury and was the most accurate in identifying acetabular cartilage injury, whereas RR had the smallest mean difference in assessing the percentage of joint affected by acetabular cartilage injury. 2D was the most accurate in identifying transition zone injuries, while RR was superior in assessing the percentage of the joint affected by transition zone injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that including both 3D MPR and RR MRI groupings is favorable for accurate joint visualization and well-informed treatment planning, especially given that labral injury is a main source of pain and dysfunction for FAI patients.

Arthroscopic classification of intra-articular hip pathology demonstrates at best moderate interrater reliability.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report several novel classification systems for intra-articular lesions observed during hip arthroscopy, and to quantify the interrater reliability of both these novel systems and existing classifications of intra-articular lesions when tested by a group of high-volume hip arthroscopists. METHODS: Five hip arthroscopists deliberated over shortcomings in current classification systems and developed several novel grading systems with particular effort made to capture factors important to the treatment and outcomes of hip arthroscopy for labral injury. A video learning module describing the classifications was then developed from the video archive of surgeries performed by the senior author and reviewed by study participants. Following review of the module, a pilot study was completed using five randomly selected videos, after which participating surgeons met once more to discuss points of disagreement and to seek clarification. The final video collection for testing reliability was composed of 29 videos selected with the intent of capturing all sublevels of each classification scheme. Study participants recorded their assessments using each classification scheme, and interrater reliability was calculated by a study participant not involved in grading. RESULTS: The average kappa coefficients for the classification schemes ranged from 0.38 to 0.54, with the interrater reliability of all classification schemes except labral degeneration qualifying as moderate. The percent of cases with absolute agreement ranged from 17.2% to 51.7% across the classification systems. CONCLUSIONS: Even among a group of high-volume hip arthroscopists who engaged in several discussions about the proposed classification schemes, grades were found to have at best moderate interrater reliability. Moderate interrater reliability is demonstrated for novel grading systems for describing labral tear complexity, labral bruising, labral size, and extent of synovitis, and fair reliability is demonstrated for labral degeneration. Further development and refinement of multifactorial grading systems for describing labral injury are indicated. Evaluating the multifactorial nature of intra-articular lesions in the hip is an important part of intraoperative decision-making and defining reliable classifications for intra-articular lesions is a critical first step towards developing generalizable criteria for guiding treatment type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Variability of glenoid labral tear patterns: a study of 280 sequential surgical cases.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid labrum tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and instability and tear patterns have historically been ascribed into categorical descriptions such as anterior, posterior, and superior labral tears (SLAP [superior labrum anterior and posterior]) with multiple subtypes. Although often quoted as representing no more than 10% of instabilities, posterior shoulder instability may be more common than previously recognized. The purpose of this study was to review observed labral tear patterns and compare incidence and morphologies to historical descriptions. METHODS: All patients undergoing arthroscopic or open labral repair (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29806, 29807, 23455, 23460, 23462, 23465) by 2 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons from July 2012 to May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Labral tears were categorized into 3 groups: exclusively anterior to the midline of the glenoid, exclusively posterior, and those crossing the midline of the glenoid. Chief complaint, mechanism of injury, hand dominance, preoperative MRI interpretation by surgeon, and independent radiologist were analyzed for each tear type. RESULTS: During the 7-year period, 280 patients underwent arthroscopic or open labral repair. Sixty percent of tears were traumatic, with dislocation being the most common traumatic mechanism at 31.4%. Ten distinct tear patterns were identified: 3 types of 90° tears (anteroinferior, posteroinferior, and posterosuperior), 4 types of 180° tears (anterior, posterior, inferior, and SLAP), 2 types of 270° tears (anteroinferior and anterosuperior), and 360° labral tears. A total of 134 tears (47.9%) were classified as posterior, and 72 tears (25.7%) were anterior. Seventy-four tears (26.4%) were combined anterior-posterior tears. Labral tears involving some portion of the posterior labrum constituted 74% of tears. A significant association between tear location and primary complaint (P < .001) was noted. Patients with anterior tears complained of only instability in 62.5% of cases, and only pain in 22%. Patients with posterior labral tears complained primarily of pain in 68% of cases, and instability in 21%. There was an accurate preoperative diagnosis given by both radiologists and surgeons on 30% (n = 63) of the tears. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variety of labral tear patterns identified at the time of surgery, and the incidence of posterior labral tears is higher than previously described. Isolated Bankart lesions are relatively rare and are often associated with more extensive labral lesions. Patients with posterior labral pathology more often complain of pain rather than instability, whereas patients with anterior labral tears more often complain of instability.

MR arthrographic evaluation of posterior paraglenoid labral cysts: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Paraglenoid labral cysts (PLCs) around the shoulder are uncommon. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary imaging modality for the description of PLCs. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate PLCs in the posterior part of the glenoid bone via MR arthrography as well as to describe associated labral abnormalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 14 patients, diagnosed with 15 posterior PLCs at MR arthrography between 2007 and 2012. Conventional MRI and MR arthrography were used for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 15 PLCs were detected in 14 patients with eight located on the right shoulder and six on the left shoulder. One case had two PLCs. While two cysts were multiloculated, the remaining 13 were seen as unilocated simple cysts. Moreover, 14 of 15 posterior PLCs (60%) were associated with labral tears at MR arthrography. The cysts in proximity to the glenoid labrum were posterosuperior in 33.3% (n = 5), mid-posterior in 36.7% (n = 7), and postero-inferior in 20% (n = 3). The majority of patients with posterosuperior and mid-posterior cysts had an associated superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions. Four of six patients with mid-posterior cysts had minimal denervation atrophy in the infraspinatus muscle. CONCLUSION: Posterior PLCs are mostly associated with posterior labral defects. The majority of cysts localized in the posterosuperior and mid-posterior were also associated with SLAP lesions. Denervation atrophy in the infraspinatus muscle may frequently accompany mid-posterior PLCs.

National Trends in the Repair of Isolated Superior Labral Tear from Anterior to Posterior in Korea.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions is controversial. Thus, we aimed to investigate the national surgical trends in isolated SLAP repair in Korea. METHODS: We analyzed a nationwide database from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2008 to 2017. We investigated the trends in SLAP repair by time, sex, age, and the type of health care institution. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2017, 27,850 isolated SLAP repairs were identified. Age-adjusted incidence rate of isolated SLAP repair increased by 692% from 1.07/100,000 in 2008 to 8.48/100,000 in 2012 (P = 0.005). However, the incidence rate declined significantly after 2012 (P = 0.032) and was 5.28/100,000 in 2017. Sex-specific incidence rate of isolated SLAP repair was 2.3 times higher in men than in women. The decline since 2012 was most evident in patients aged ≥ 40 years (P = 0.01); however, the incidence rates of isolated SLAP repair during the study period were similar between patients aged ≥ 40 years and those aged < 40 years. Moreover, hospitals with 30-100 beds had the greatest change in the number of isolated SLAP repair cases. CONCLUSION: In Korea, the incidence of isolated SLAP repair increased dramatically until 2012; since then, it has declined. Although the decrease in isolated SLAP repair later in the study was evident in those aged ≥ 40 years, the incidence rate was still relatively high in patients aged ≥ 40 years.

Patient-specific factors are associated with severity of chondrolabral injury in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between patient-specific factors, preoperative radiographic findings, and the presence and severity of chondrolabral damage identified during hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2017, patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tear were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-specific variables including age, gender, BMI, LCEA, and alpha angle were collected. Surgical reports were reviewed for labral tear position and size, as well as severity of acetabular and femoral chondromalacia. RESULTS: There were 205 patients who met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 33 years (range 15-66), BMI 26.5 (range 15.9-44.5), LCEA 32.2° (range 21.0°-56.0°) and alpha angle 59.1° (range 33.0°-86.0°). Greater age (p = 0.023), alpha angle (p = 0.011) and male gender (p < 0.001) significantly correlated with high-grade acetabular chondral damage. Increased LCEA (p < 0.001), increased alpha angle (p = 0.012), and greater age (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with increased labral tear size. CONCLUSIONS: Greater age, male gender, increased BMI and increased alpha angle were associated with more advanced acetabular chondromalacia. Additionally, greater age, increased LCEA, and increased alpha angle was associated with larger labral tear size. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Glenoid version is associated with different labrum tear patterns in shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have evaluated glenoid version as a risk factor for anterior and posterior shoulder instability. However, the association of glenoid version with combined anterior-inferior-posterior (>180°) labrum injuries is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to investigate various parameters of glenoid morphology, including version, in >180° labral tears and to compare these values with isolated anterior and isolated posterior tears. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging studies from a consecutive series of shoulder instability patients were reviewed by 3 independent observers to measure the parameters of glenoid morphology including superior-inferior and anterior-posterior diameter, diameter ratio, glenoid version using the glenoid vault method, and percentage of glenoid bone loss using the best-fit circle method. These parameters were compared between patients with anterior (group 1), posterior (group 2), and >180° labral tears (group 3). Interobserver reliability coefficients were calculated for all measurements assessed. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences for all group comparisons regarding the glenoid version, with group 2 having the most retroversion (19.9° ± 4.71°) followed by group 3 (14.21° ± 4.59°) and group 1 (11.24° ± 5.3°). Group 3 showed the lowest amount of glenoid bone loss; however, the group differences did not reach statistical significance. There was also no statistically significant group difference for the other measured parameters. Interobserver reliability was in the good to excellent range for all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Combined anterior-inferior-posterior labral tears are associated with an increased amount of glenoid retroversion compared with isolated anterior labral tears. Isolated posterior labral tears have the largest amount of glenoid retroversion of all tear patterns.

Nonoperative Management of Hip Labral Tears Yields Similar Total Hip Arthroplasty Conversion Rate to Arthroscopic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic treatment of hip labral tears has increased significantly in recent years. There is limited evidence comparing nonoperative management to arthroscopic treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA), as well as the cost associated with arthroscopic management of labral tears compared to nonoperative treatment. METHODS: The Humana claims database was queried from 2007 through 2016. International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients with hip labral tears and hip arthroscopy and THA procedures. Two cohorts were created: a nonoperative group and an operative group. Following propensity score matching, the rate of conversion and time to THA conversion were calculated. Cost was calculated using the total cost reimbursed for encounters within 6 months. Continuous variables were analyzed using Student t-test and Mann-Whitney test, and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square test. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 864 patients were included in the analysis. The conversion rate to THA in the operative group (6.7%) and the nonoperative group (5.3%) was not statistically different (P = .391). The operative group had a longer time to THA (21.5 ± 16.8 months) than the nonoperative group (15.9 ± 19.5 months; P = .044). The cost for the operative group was significantly higher ($14,266.55 ± $7187.96) compared to the nonoperative group ($2941.96 ± $2664.00; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study did not find a difference in the rate of conversion to THA for operative vs nonoperative groups. Time to THA in the operative group was longer, however, at the expense of higher costs.

Long-Term Results of Periacetabular Rotational Osteotomy Concomitantly With Arthroscopy in Adult Acetabular Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Although the long-term results of periacetabular osteotomy in acetabular dysplasia have been well documented, there is paucity in reports on the long-term outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy with simultaneous hip arthroscopy. This study aimed to assess the cumulative 10-year outcomes of periacetabular rotational osteotomy with concomitant hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Through an arthroscopic procedure, the status of the labrum was assessed, and torn labrum was debrided. Evaluations on survival from conversion to total hip arthroplasty and success in radiographic and clinical long-term results were completed in 39 hips (36 patients). Acetabular parameters (center-edge angle, Sharp angle, acetabular-head index, and head lateralization index), Tönnis grades on radiograph, Harris Hip Score, and range of motion of the hip were evaluated. Survivorship analyses were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty-eight hips (97.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.832-0.996) were preserved for 12.8 ± 1.7 years on average, and only 1 hip was converted to total hip arthroplasty at 7.8 years. All the acetabular parameters were improved (P < .001). Twenty-eight hips (71.8%) showed unchanged or improved Tönnis grades at the latest follow-up. The average Harris Hip Score was significantly better than the preoperative value (P < .001), and range of motion was not significantly different until the latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: Sufficient acetabular reorientation, such as periacetabular rotational osteotomy, with concomitant arthroscopic debridement showed successful long-term outcomes for acetabular dysplasia in adults.

Intra-articular pathology affects outcomes after joint preserving surgery for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

PURPOSE: Currently, knowledge regarding the intra-articular pathology and its relationship to outcomes after joint-preserving surgery in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is lacking. The purposes were to evaluate the intra-articular pathology and its relationship with outcomes of joint-preserving surgery in ONFH. METHODS: We reviewed 41 hips with ONFH in 41 patients (27 women; mean age, 34.9 years old) who underwent intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy. Radiographic evaluations were based on pre-operative imaging studies, including radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intra-articular pathology was evaluated by arthroscopic inspection of the femoral head, labrum, and acetabular cartilage during surgery. In addition, we performed radiographic measurements of the hip, including the collapse of the femoral head and minimal joint space width at three  years post-operatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: Arthroscopy revealed damage to the acetabular cartilage and labrum in 22 (54%) and 13 patients (32%), respectively. However, these lesions could be detected on imaging in only 13 (32%) and ten patients (24%), respectively. The change in joint space width after surgery was significantly higher in patients with cartilage degeneration and labral injury (P = 0.02, P = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis for subsequent progression of osteoarthritis showed an association with degenerative changes of articular cartilage and the labral tear as independent predictors (P = 0.001, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the presence of labral and acetabular cartilage lesions in ONFH patients, while images do not reveal the full extent of the tissue damage. These intra-articular pathologies can be associated with the outcomes after joint-preserving surgery.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: anatomy and pathology.

The aim of this review is to outline the normal anatomy of the hip and to discuss common painful conditions of the hip that affect the general adult population. Hip pain is a common complaint with many different etiologies. In this review, hip pathologies are divided by location into osseous, intra-articular and extra-articular lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for investigating painful hip conditions due to its multiplanar capability and high contrast resolution. This review focuses on the characteristic MRI features of common traumatic and pathologic conditions of the hip.

Hip Dysplasia Compromises the Outcome of Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia presenting with labral tear is unknown. Although femoroacetabular osteoplasty (FAO) has excellent outcome for most femoroacetabular impingement patients, the presence of concomitant hip dysplasia has been implicated as an adverse prognostic factor. This study evaluated the outcome of FAO in a group of dysplastic hips and compared the outcome to a cohort of patients without dysplasia. METHODS: Seventy-three patients (38 males, 35 females) with hip dysplasia who underwent FAO between 2007 and 2015 were identified. The minimum 2-year clinical, functional (modified Harris Hip Score and Short-Form 36 Health Survey), and radiological outcome was compared with 550 patients without dysplasia who underwent FAO by the same surgeon. The preoperative and postoperative alpha angle, Tonnis grade, joint space, and presence of chondral lesion were determined and compared. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty or revision FAO was considered as treatment failure. RESULTS: The mean age in the dysplasia cohort was 30.7 ± 11.8 years compared to 34.5 ± 11.2 in the nondysplastic group. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years for dysplasia cohort and 4.1 for the nondysplastic group. The mean modified Harris Hip Score and Short-Form 36 Health Survey6 was significantly lower in the dysplastic group at 75.1 and 74.3 compared to 83.4 and 85.6 for the comparison group. There was a higher percentage of failure at 28.8% among dysplasia patients compared to 2.5% in the nondysplastic group. CONCLUSION: Although labral repair and FAO may be an option for patients with hip dysplasia, the outcome in this population appears to be less optimal compared to femoroacetabular impingement patients with no evidence of dysplasia. Labral repair and osteoplasty should be limited to those with mild and borderline dysplasia.

Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3T MRI against 1.5T MR arthrography (MRA) in patients with clinical femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with clinical FAI underwent both 1.5T MRA and 3T MRI. Imaging was prospectively analysed by two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to patient outcomes and scored for internal derangement including labral and cartilage abnormality. Interobserver variation was assessed by kappa analysis. Thirty-nine patients subsequently underwent hip arthroscopy and surgical results and radiology findings were analysed. RESULTS: Both readers had higher sensitivities for detecting labral tears with 3T MRI compared to 1.5T MRA (not statistically significant p=0.07). For acetabular cartilage defect both readers had higher statistically significant sensitivities using 3T MRI compared to 1.5T MRA (p=0.02). Both readers had a slightly higher sensitivity for detecting delamination with 1.5T MRA compared to 3T MRI, but these differences were not statistically significant (p=0.66). Interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect agreement for all parameters except the identification of delamination (3T MRI showed moderate agreement and 1.5T MRA substantial agreement). CONCLUSION: Conventional 3T MRI may be at least equivalent to 1.5T MRA in detecting acetabular labrum and possibly superior to 1.5T MRA in detecting cartilage defects in patients with suspected FAI. KEY POINTS: • Conventional 3T MRI is equivalent to 1.5T MRA for diagnosing labral tears. • Conventional 3T MRI is superior to 1.5T MRA for diagnosing acetabular cartilage defect. • Conventional 3T MRI is equivalent to 1.5T MRA for diagnosing cartilage delamination. • Symptom severity score was significantly higher (p<0.05) in group proceeding to surgery.