The utility of intraperitoneal drain placement after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess prevention.

BACKGROUND: Perforated appendicitis is associated with postoperative development of intraperitoneal abscess. Intraperitoneal drain placement during appendectomy is thought to reduce the risk of developing postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraperitoneal drainage could reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal abscess formation after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients (aged 7 and above) who were diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2018 and December 2022 at two government hospitals in the state of Kuwait. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics were compared between patients who underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. Secondary outcomes included overall postoperative complications, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and postoperative percutaneous drainage. RESULTS: A total of 511 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2022. Of these, 307 (60.1%) underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement. Patients with and without drains were similar regarding age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (Table 1). The overall rate of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess was 6.1%. Postoperatively, there was no difference in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess formation between patients who underwent intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not (6.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.707). Patients with intraperitoneal drains had a longer LOS (4 [4, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5] days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall complication (18.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.065), superficial SSI (2.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.791) or readmission rate (4.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.835). CONCLUSIONS: Following laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, intraperitoneal drain placement appears to confer no additional benefit and may prolong hospital stay.

Internal and external factors affecting the performance score of surgical trainees doing laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, observational cohort study in a structured training programme.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common procedure and introduced early in general surgical training. How internal (i.e. surgeon's experience) or external (i.e. disease severity) may affect procedure performance is not well-studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that may have an influence on the performance scores for surgical trainees. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study of laparoscopic appendectomies performed by surgical trainees (experience < 4 years) operating under supervision. Trainers evaluated trainees' overall performance on a 6-point scale for proficiency. Perioperative data were recorded, including appendicitis severity, operating time and the overall difficulty of the procedure as assessed by the trainer. A "Challenging" procedure was defined as a combination of either/or "perforation" and "difficult". Trainees who had performed > 30 appendectomies were defined as "experienced". The trainees were asked if they had used simulation or web-based tools the week prior to surgery. RESULTS: 142 procedure evaluation forms were included of which 19 (13%) were "perforated", 14 (10%) "difficult" and 24 (17%) "Challenging". Perforated appendicitis was strongly associated with procedure difficulty (OR 21.2, 95% CI 6.0-75.6). Experienced trainees performed "proficient" more often than non-experienced (OR 34.5, 95% CI 6.8-176.5). "Difficult" procedures were inversely associated with proficiency (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0-0.9). In "Challenging" procedures, identifying the appendix had lowest proficiency (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). The procedures assessed as "difficult" had significantly longer operating time with a median (IQR) of 90 (75-100) min compared to 59 (25-120) min for the non-difficult (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both internal and external factors contribute to the performance score. Perforated appendicitis, technical difficult procedures and trainee experience all play a role, but a "difficult" procedure had most overall impact on proficiency evaluation.

Single versus double Hem-o-lok clips to secure the apendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized multicentric clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Polymeric clips (Hem-o-lok ligation system) are now widely used to securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Studies comparing the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of a single hem-o-lok clips with a double hem-o-lok clips for closure of an appendiceal stump. METHODS: This prospective randomized study includes patients from two centers who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with the diagnosis of appendicitis between September 2020 and March 2023. Demographic, operative and clinical outcomes of the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips for closure of the appendiceal stump were compared. Factors affecting long postoperative hospital stay were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyzes. RESULTS: One hundred forty two (48.3%) patients in the single hem-o-lok arm and 152 (51.7%) patients in the double hem-o-lok arm were included in the analysis.The shortest operative time was noted in the single hem-o-lok group (52.1 ± 19.9 versus 61.6 ± 24.9 min, p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-10) in the single hem-o-lok group and 1 day (range 1-12) in the double hem-o-lok group, and was shorter in the single hem-o-lok arm (1.61 ± 1.56 vs 1.84 ± 1.69, p = 0.019). Based on multivariate analysis, drain placement was identified as an independent predictive factor for long hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The use of single hem-o-lok clips for appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective. Trial registration NCT04387370 ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ).

Systemic glucocorticoid exposure and postoperative infection risk in 143,782 appendectomy patients-a Danish longitudinal nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are conventionally associated with increased postoperative infection risk. It is necessary to clarify if preoperative glucocorticoid exposure is associated with postoperative infection in appendectomy patients and if the association is different for open and laparoscopic appendectomies. METHODS: A Danish nationwide study of appendectomy patients between 1996 and 2018. Exposures were defined as high (≥ 5 mg) versus no/low (< 5 mg) glucocorticoid exposure in milligram prednisone-equivalents/day preoperatively. The main outcome was any postoperative infection. Then, 90-day cumulative incidences (absolute risk) and adjusted hazard ratios (relative risk) of the outcome were calculated for high versus no/low glucocorticoid exposure within all appendectomies and within open and laparoscopic subgroups. Propensity-score matching was used for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Of 143,782 patients, median age was 29 years, 74,543 were female, and 7654 experienced at least one infection during the 90-day follow-up. The 90-day cumulative incidence for postoperative infection was 5.3% within the no/low glucocorticoid exposure group and 10.0% within the high glucocorticoid exposure group. Compared to no/low glucocorticoid exposure, adjusted hazard ratios for 90-day postoperative infection with high glucocorticoid exposure were 1.25 [95% CI 1.02-1.52; p = 0.03] for all appendectomies, 1.59 [1.16-2.18; p = 0.004] for laparoscopic appendectomies, and 1.09 [0.85-1.40; p = 0.52] for open appendectomies (pinteraction < 0.001). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Preoperative high (≥ 5 mg/day) glucocorticoid exposure was associated with increased absolute risk of postoperative infections in open and laparoscopic appendectomies. The relative risk increase was significant for laparoscopic but not open appendectomies, possibly due to lower absolute risk with no/low glucocorticoid exposure in the laparoscopic subgroup.

Modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy vs. laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

OBJECTIVES: Modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (mERAT) has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendicitis. However, data from children in large samples are lacking. The aim of this article is to evaluate the efficacy between mERAT and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 594 patients with suspected uncomplicated appendicitis from October 2018 to May 2021. A pool of 294 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were ultimately enrolled in this study (228 and 66 patients in mERAT and LA, respectively). Given the differences in baseline clinical data (gender, age), the regression equation including differences in clinical baseline, grouping factor, and white blood cell count was established to address the influence of potential confounding factors. RESULT: The initial success rate of mERAT management was 96.9%, and the recurrence rate was 6.9% in the mERAT group and 1.7% in the LA group within 1 year, which was no significant difference. But the mERAT group had a lower rate of adverse events. Finally, those results indicated that the treatment modalities, LA or mERAT, had no significant effect on initial success rate (P = 0.99) or recurrence rate (P = 0.17) within 1 year, but a significant effect on the adverse events rate during hospitalization (P = 0.01) in the multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Among children with uncomplicated appendicitis, an initial mERAT management strategy had a success rate of 96.9%, which was similar to the LA group at 1 year. This follow-up supports the feasibility of mERAT alone as an alternative to surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis.

Impact of surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery among paediatric appendicitis patients: A meta-analysis.

Operative site wound infection is one of the most frequent infections in surgery. A variety of studies have shown that the results of laparoscopy might be superior to those of an open procedure. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of clarity as to whether there is a difference between open and laparoscopy with respect to the occurrence of wound infections in different paediatric operations. In this review, we looked at randomized, controlled studies that directly measured the rate of wound infection following an appendectomy with a laparoscope. We looked up four main databases for randomized, controlled studies that compare the treatment of paediatric appendicitis with laparoscopy. The surgeries included appendectomy. Through our search, we have determined 323 related papers and selected five qualified ones to be analysed according to the eligibility criteria. Five trials were also assessed for the quality of the documents. In the 5 trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post-operative wound infection among the paediatric appendectomy and the open-access group (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-1.15, p = 0.13). The four trials did not show any statistically significant difference in abdominal abscesses among the laparoscopic and open-access treatment groups (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.90-3.01, p = 0.11). The four trials did not reveal any statistically significant difference in operating time (mean difference, -4.36; 95% CI, -17.31 to 8.59, p = 0.51). In light of these findings, the use of laparoscopy as compared with the open-approach approach in paediatric appendectomies is not associated with a reduction in the risk of wound infection.

A case of death after the severing three appendiceal arteries during appendectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal issues requiring surgery and is usually treated by appendectomy. During the process of removing the appendix, the appendiceal artery is severed. In most individuals, the appendix is supplied by only one appendiceal artery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old man underwent appendectomy. During the surgical procedure, the appendix artery and two accessory arteries of the appendix were severed, leading to massive hemorrhaging in the abdominal cavity, which ultimately resulted in the patient's unfortunate demise. CONCLUSION: Through this case, we hope that surgeons can learn more about the anatomy of the appendiceal artery and understand the possibility of accessory arteries to the appendix. During surgery, the blood vessels supplying the appendix should be carefully explored, and the "one-size-fits-all approach" should be avoided. Moreover, attention should be given to complications after appendectomy, and timely symptomatic treatment should be provided. Key points 1. Rare typing: The case of death due to improper handling of the accessory appendicular artery during appendectomy in patients with three appendiceal arteries is currently unreported. 2. Detailed anatomical knowledge: Surgeons performing an appendectomy need to make a detailed exploration of the blood vessel supply of the appendix to avoid ignoring anatomically different blood vessels. 3. Avoid a one-size-fits-all approach: In the surgical process, a "one-size-fits-all" approach should be avoided, that is, the same surgical approach should not be used in all cases, but should be adjusted according to the anatomical characteristics of the individual. 4. Observation of postoperative bleeding: In the perioperative period, peritoneal drainage should be closely observed. If a large amount of bloody fluid is found, timely surgical treatment should be carried out. 5. Attention to complications: Surgeons should pay.

Patient Outcomes in Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Acute Surgical Care Model Compared to Traditional Call.

INTRODUCTION: Shift-based models for acute surgical care (ACS), where surgical emergencies are treated by a dedicated team of surgeons working shifts, without a concurrent elective practice, are becoming more common nationwide. We compared the outcomes for appendectomy, one of the most common emergency surgical procedures, between the traditional (TRAD) call and ACS model at the same institution during the same time frame. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis during 2017-2018. ACS and TRAD-patient demographics, clinical presentation, operative details, and outcomes were compared using independent sample t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Fisher's exact or χ2 tests. Multiple exploratory regression models were constructed to examine the effects of confounding variables. RESULTS: Demographics, clinical presentation, and complication rates were similar between groups except for a longer duration of symptoms prior to arrival in the TRAD group (Δ = 0.5 d, P = 0.006). Time from admission to operating room (Δ = -1.85 h, P = 0.003), length of hospital stay (Δ = -2.0 d, P < 0.001), and total cost (Δ = $ -2477.02, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the ACS group compared to the TRAD group. Furthermore, perforation rates were lower in ACS (8.3% versus 28.6%, P = 0.003). Differences for the outcomes remained significant even after controlling for duration of symptoms prior to arrival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Acute appendicitis managed using the ACS shift-based model seems to be associated with reduced time to operation, hospital stay, and overall cost, with equivalent success rates, compared to TRAD.

Impact of visceral obesity on the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of visceral obesity on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHODS: a retrospective study on 441 patients who underwent a LA between July 2019 and July 2020. According to the cutoff visceral fat area (VFA) for visceral obesity, the patients were divided into two groups: visceral obesity group (n = 123) and non-visceral obesity group (n = 318). The general information, comorbidities, perioperative monitoring indicators, and postoperative complications of the patients were collected. RESULTS: Compared with the non-visceral obesity group, the proportion of overweight patients (56.10%), preoperative white blood cell count (12.92 (9.99, 15.58)*109mg/dl), postoperative white blood cell count (9.71 ± 3.91*109mg/dl), and hospitalization costs (16,220.93 ± 7038.76¥) in the visceral obesity group were significantly different (all p < 0.05). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that visceral obesity (2.679, 95%CI: 1.155-5.849, p = 0.027), indwelling drainage tube (7.832, 95%CI: 2.151-27.428, p < 0.001), and perforated appendicitis (3.181, 95%CI: 1.195-7.136, p = 0.025) were identified to be independent risk factors for incision infection after LA. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve value for VFA predicting incisional infection after LA was 0.770. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral obesity is one of the independent risk factors for incisional infection after LA, and can be used as one of the reference indicators for prognostic assessment of short-term outcomes after LA.

Surgeons' attitudes during laparoscopic appendectomy: do subjective intraoperative assessments affect the choice of peritoneal irrigation? A spin-off analysis from the REsiDENT-1 multicentre prospective observational trial.

AIMS: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most performed procedures. The effects of peritoneal lavage (PL) and the reasons to perform it have not been cleared and all meta-analyses didn't show a statistical advantage to prevent infectious complications. This study aims to investigate surgeons' perceptions during LA, comparing intraoperative findings with histological results, and exploring how surgeons' subjectivity influences the decision-making process on PL. METHODS: Data were extracted from the two-year data lock from REsiDENT-1 registry, a prospective resident-led multicentre observational trial. This study investigates the relationships between PL and postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (pIAA) introducing a classification for AA to standardize the intraoperative grading. We included pre, intra, and postoperative variables. We applied our classification proposal, used a five-point Likert scale (Ls) to assess subjective LA difficulty and ran a concordance analysis between the assessment of AA and histology. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression model was built to find factors influencing PL. RESULTS: 561 patients were enrolled from twenty-one hospitals and 51 residents. 542 procedures were included in the logistic regression analysis and 441 in the concordance analysis, due to missing data. PL was used in 222 LA (39, 6%). We discovered a moderate positive monotonic relationship between surgical evaluation and histology, p < 0.001. Despite this, the reliability of the surgeon's assessment of appendicitis is progressively lower for gangrenous and perforated forms. The increasing grade of contamination, the increasing grade of subjective difficulty and the intraoperative finding of a gangrenous or perforated appendicitis were independent predictors of PL. CONCLUSION: This study shows how surgeons' evaluation of AA severity overestimated more than half of gangrenous or perforated appendices with the perception of a challenging procedure. These perceptions influenced the choice of PL. We proved that the evaluation during LA could be affected by subjectivity with a non-negligible impact on the decision-making process.

Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain, and treatment with laparoscopy has become increasingly common during the past two decades. Guidelines recommend that normal appendices are removed if operated for suspected acute appendicitis. It is unclear how many patients are affected by this recommendation. The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of negative appendectomies in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. METHODS: This study was reported following the PRISMA 2020 statement. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase for retrospective or prospective cohort studies (with n ≥ 100) including patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The primary outcome was the histopathologically confirmed negative appendectomy rate after a laparoscopic approach with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed subgroup analyses on geographical region, age, sex, and use of preoperative imaging or scoring systems. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: In total, 74 studies were identified, summing up to 76,688 patients. The negative appendectomy rate varied from 0% to 46% in the included studies (interquartile range 4-20%). The meta-analysis estimated the negative appendectomy rate to be 13% (95% CI 12-14%) with large variations between the individual studies. Sensitivity analyses did not change the estimate. The certainty of evidence by GRADE was moderate due to inconsistency in point estimates. CONCLUSION: The overall estimated negative appendectomy rate after laparoscopic surgery was 13% with moderate certainty of evidence. The negative appendectomy rate varied greatly between studies.

Bone metaplasia of the appendix presented with clinical and computed tomography signs of acute appendicitis managed with laparoscopic appendectomy.

Bone metaplasia or heterotopic ossification of the appendix is an extremely rare condition, which is usually associated with mucinous appendiceal neoplasms. This case describes a young male patient, who presented to the surgical emergency department with clinical and computed tomography signs of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. The final histopathological examination revealed a bone metaplasia of the distal appendix, without any other associated appendiceal pathology. According to our knowledge and literature review, this is the first such case described in the English literature yet.

Perforated appendicitis treated with laparoscopic appendicectomy or open appendicectomy: A meta-analysis.

Aim: This analysis compared the impact of laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) on treating adult perforated appendicitis (PA). Methods: Articles relating to LA and OA in treating PA were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase since their founding to January 2022. These articles were independently filtered based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two investigators. The quality of these articles was assessed and article data were extracted. Dichotomous data were presented in the form of odd's ratio (OR), whereas continuous data were in the form of weighted mean difference (WMD). The included articles reported at least one of the following outcomes: intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), wound infection, operative time, hospital stay and complications. Results: Three randomised control trials (198 LA cases vs. 205 OA cases) and 12 case - control trials (914 LA cases vs. 2192 OA cases) were included. This analysis revealed that although the IAA formation rate was similar in the LA and OA groups (OR: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-1.88), the wound infection rate was lower in the LA group (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.28-0.51). Furthermore, LA was associated with shorter hospital stay (WMD: -1.43 days, 95% CI: -2.33--0.52) and fewer complications than OA (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.57). Conclusion: LA has significant benefits in treating PA and is associated with better post-operative outcomes such as shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of wound infection and other complications. However, more studies with randomised and large-sample populations are still required to determine the clinical benefit of LA in treating PA.

[Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy]. / Laparoskopicheskaya appendektomiya pri ostrom appenditsite u beremennykh.

The review is devoted to the role of laparoscopic appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. We analyzed reviews, prospective and retrospective studies in the PubMed, Google, the Springer Link online library, the Cochrane Systematic Review databases. The results of laparoscopic and traditional treatment of acute appendicitis in pregnant women were assessed. We analyzed clinical, epidemiological features in these patients, differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women, indications and contraindications for endoscopic treatment, features of laparoscopic procedures. Comparative assessment of laparoscopic and open surgeries for acute appendicitis in pregnant women was carried out. We also estimated the influence of surgical treatment of acute appendicitis on subsequent course of pregnancy.

Operative Time Is Independently Associated With Morbidity in Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Complicated appendicitis is a common cause of morbidity in children. Studies have analyzed the risk factors in the surgical treatment of this pathology, including obesity and disease severity, but not operative time (OT). We hypothesize that OT is independently associated with increased morbidity for children with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2018 and 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics data sets. Patients aged 2-18 y who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis were identified. Patient demographics, disease severity, and operative details were evaluated. Surgical site infections (SSIs), hospital length of stay (LOS), ≤30-d readmissions and reoperations, interventional radiologic drain (IR-drain) placement, pneumonia, and death were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 8168 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 9.96 ± 3.9 y and a mean weight of 41.2 ± 21.2 kg. The mean OT was 55.8 ± 24.9 min, with a mean LOS of 5.15 ± 3.37 d. For every 1-min increase in OT, there was an independently associated increase in the likelihood of any SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008-1.013), superficial SSI (OR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.004-1.020), organ-space SSI (OR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.008-1.013), IR-drain placement (OR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.008-1.013), and readmission (OR = 1.004; 95% CI 1.000-1.007). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged OT is independently associated with greater likelihood of any SSI, superficial SSI, organ-space SSI, IR-drain placement, readmission and reoperation within 30 d, and longer hospital LOS. There is a need to determine modifiable factors that prolong OT to aid in the optimization of routine operations to reduce patient morbidity.

Delayed diagnosis and subsequently increased severity of acute appendicitis (compatible with clinical-pathologic grounds) during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational case-control study.

BACKGROUND: During a global crisis like the current COVID-19 pandemic, delayed admission to hospital in cases of emergent medical illness may lead to serious adverse consequences. We aimed to determine whether such delayed admission affected the severity of an inflammatory process regarding acute appendicitis, and its convalescence. METHODS: In a retrospective observational cohort case-control study, we analyzed the medical data of 60 patients who were emergently and consecutively admitted to our hospital due to acute appendicitis as established by clinical presentation and imaging modalities, during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic (our study group). We matched a statistically control group consisting of 97 patients who were admitted during a previous 12-month period for the same etiology. All underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. The main study parameters included intraoperative findings (validated by histopathology), duration of abdominal pain prior to admission, hospital stay and postoperative convalescence (reflecting the consequences of delay in diagnosis and surgery). RESULTS: The mean duration of abdominal pain until surgery was significantly longer in the study group. The rate of advanced appendicitis (suppurative and gangrenous appendicitis as well as peri-appendicular abscess) was greater in the study than in the control group (38.3 vs. 21.6%, 23.3 vs. 16.5%, and 5 vs. 1% respectively), as well as mean hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: A global crisis like the current viral pandemic may significantly affect emergent admissions to hospital (as in case of acute appendicitis), leading to delayed surgical interventions and its consequences.

Cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy in a large integrated healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare expenditure is on the rise placing greater emphasis on operational excellence, cost containment, and high quality of care. Significant variation is seen in operating room (OR) costs with common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. Surgeons can influence cost through the selection of instrumentation for common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. We aimed to quantify the cost of laparoscopic appendectomy in our healthcare system and compare cost variations to operative times and outcomes. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We performed a retrospective review of laparoscopic appendectomies in a large regional healthcare system during one-year period (2018). Operating room supply costs and procedure durations were obtained for each hospital. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) outcomes and demographics were compared to the costs for each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 4757 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed at 20 hospitals (27 to 522 per hospital) by 233 surgeons. The average supply cost per case ranged from $650 to $1067. Individual surgeon cost ranged from $197 to $1181. The average operative time was 41 min (range 33 to 60 min). There was no association between lower cost and longer operative time. The patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between sites. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between high- and low-cost centers. The items with the greatest increase in cost were single-use energy devices (SUD) and endoscopic stapler. We estimate that a saving of over $417 per case is possible by avoiding the use of energy devices and may be as high as $ 984 by adding selective use of staplers. These modifications would result in an annual savings of $1 million for our health system and more than $ 125 million nationwide. CONCLUSION: Performing laparoscopic appendectomy with reusable instruments and finding alternatives to expensive energy devices and staplers can significantly decrease costs and does not increase operative time or postoperative complications.

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for management of acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the feasibility of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) for the treatment of acute appendicitis. METHODS: There were 210 patients included who were admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to October 2019 with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. According to the method of treatment, patients were stratified into the ERAT group, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group, or open appendectomy (OA) group for comparison of perioperative information extracted from the medical records of the patients. RESULTS: The operations were successfully completed in all patients. The length of operation in the ERAT group (median: 48 min, range: 34-78 min) was significantly shorter compared to the LA group (median: 67 min, range: 47-90 min) or OA group (median: 85 min, range: 58-120 min). Postoperatively, the length of the hospital stay, the amount of time spent bedridden following surgery, surgery-related complications, and in-patient expenses were all significantly less than those in both the LA and OA groups (all p < 0.05). Moreover, the recurrence rate of appendicitis after ERAT was 2.86% during the first six months of postoperative follow-up. Thirteen patients in the ERAT group were diagnosed with appendicular abscesses, all of which successfully proceeded by colonoscopically incising the most protruding or fluctuating place around the appendix opening without procedure-related complications during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: ERAT is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment method for acute appendicitis and abscesses of the appendix. The advantages include reduced trauma, faster recovery times, and lower costs in comparison with either OA or LA procedures. ERAT with internal incision and drainage can be safely performed with immediate effect, especially in patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis accompanied by either fecal stones or stenosis of the appendix cavity, or an abscess within the appendix cavity.

The NOpioid Project: a prospective observational feasibility study examining the implementation of a non-narcotic post-operative pain control regimen.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative prescription of opioids has fueled an increase in opioid-associated morbidity and mortality. Alternative post-operative pain control with non-opioid pharmaceuticals can help counteract this effect. We investigated a non-opioid pain management protocol following emergent laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Our tertiary referral center performed a prospective observational feasibility study of patients from October 2019 to 2020 who underwent emergent laparoscopic appendectomies and cholecystectomies. Patients aged 18-65 with no prior history of chronic pain or opioid abuse, no contraindications to taking acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and Glomerular Filtration Rate > 60 ml/min were included. Counseling was provided about non-narcotic pain control. Patients were not prescribed narcotics at discharge and were instead prescribed ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Patients were surveyed at their 2-week post-operative appointment to assess pain control and other patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and completed the postoperative survey. Thirty-two were female (63%), average age 38, and BMI 30.4. 30 (59%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute non-perforated appendicitis and 21 (41%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis or symptomatic cholelithiasis. 88% of patients felt satisfied or neutral with their post-operative pain control at discharge. After 2 weeks, 34 patients (66.7%) rated QOL as high, 17 (33.3%) rated QOL as moderate, and none rated QOL as poor. Fascial suture was not associated with poor outcomes. Anxiety, depression, alcohol use, and prior abdominal surgery were not associated with increased need for post-operative narcotics. There were no significant differences between appendectomy and cholecystectomy in satisfaction with pain control or QOL (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgery have an increased risk of developing an opioid disorder. The NOpioid Project demonstrated a non-narcotic multimodal pain regimen can be effectively adopted in the post-operative period after an emergent laparoscopic appendectomy or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A new approach to laparoscopic appendectomy in children-clipless/sutureless Harmonic scalpel laparoscopic appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate Harmonic scalpel performance in laparoscopic appendectomy for sealing the base of the appendix in children. METHODS: During the study period, a total of 312 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were included in prospective bicenter clinical trial. The patients were divided in two study groups in regard to technique used for appendiceal base closure. In the first group (n = 197) the appendiceal base was secured using a polymeric clip while in the second group (n = 115) the Harmonic scalpel was used for sealing the base in a stepwise manner, without placing any clip or suture. Outcomes of treatment, including complication rates, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients with a median age of 11 years (IQR 8, 15) were included in study. Of these, 191 were males (61.2%). Both groups were symmetric in regard to baseline characteristics of the patients. A total of 10 (5.1%) postoperative complications (postoperative abscess n = 7 and ileus n = 3) were recorded in the polymeric clip group while none of the patients from the clipless group had postoperative complications (P = 0.015). In the group who received a polymeric clip appendectomy, fever lasting 0-72 h and > 72 h was recorded in 16 (8.1%) and 12 (6.1%) children, respectively, while in the clipless group, it was observed in 2 (1.7%) and 5 (4.3%) children, respectively (P = 0.048). Significantly shorter surgical times were found in the clipless group compared to the polymeric clip group (21 min (IQR 18, 25) vs. 30 min (IQR 22, 40), P < 0.0001). Also, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the clipless group of the patients (2 days (IQR 2, 3) vs. 3 days (IQR 2, 4), P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clipless harmonic scalpel laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective method in children for treatment of acute appendicitis with lesser number of complications and shorter duration of surgery compared to laparoscopic appendectomy in which the appendiceal base is secured with clip.