Periictal sign of the cross or Signum Crucis as a lateralizing sign in focal epilepsies: Not only a right temporal lobe epilepsy feature.

INTRODUCTION: The sign of the cross (SC) is a catholic ritual that has been described as an automatism during the ictal phase in patients with right temporal lobe epilepsy. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to describe the prevalence of the SC and analyze the characteristics of patients who presented this phenomenon during the video-electroencephalography (VEEG) admission in our Epilepsy department. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 1308 recorded seizures; 14 patients presented the SC during the admission. Seizure semiology, electroencephalography (EEG), etiology, neuroimaging, and surgical findings were analyzed. RESULTS: A prevalence of 1.1% was found, and the sign was not only an ictal finding (21% was postictal) but also exclusive of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (15% were extratemporal) in contrast to what has been reported so far. The localizing and lateralizing value of the ictal SC was low (sensitivity 75%, specificity 33.3%, positive predictive value 60%, negative predictive value 50% for a right temporal epileptogenic zone (EZ)) compared with other previously described signs. Regardless of the lateralization of the EZ, the sign was always performed with the right hand supporting the hypothesis of a possible learned behavioral automatism. CONCLUSION: The SC is a rare ictal or postictal manifestation that occurs in patients with temporal and extratemporal epilepsies without clear localizing and lateralizing value compared with previously described signs.

An evaluation of lateralizing signs in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Resective epilepsy surgery has been accepted as an effective treatment for patients with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to control the seizures and to limit cognitive dysfunction. Complete resection of the epileptic zone, and therefore the success of the surgery, depends on the identification of the seizure focus. Reliable lateralizing semiologic signs, together with other presurgical assessments, are of great importance for an accurate identification of the seizure focus. In this respect, this study evaluated the frequency of semiologic signs in medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) together with the lateralizing values and variations according to the age and gender groups. Two hundred seventy-three seizures of 55 patients of the Adult Epilepsy Monitoring Unit of Gazi University Faculty of Medicine with the diagnosis of medically intractable TLE, whose epileptic foci were detected through noninvasive presurgical procedures and seizures were controlled successfully after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), were analyzed retrospectively. Seizure semiologies of the patients were evaluated in terms of lateralizing values, and it was inquired whether age/gender causes any variation. Versive head rotation, unilateral dystonic limb posturing, asymmetric tonic limb posturing, and the combination of unilateral hand automatisms and dystonic posturing were determined as the semiologic signs with the highest lateralizing values (90-100%). While hand automatisms were observed frequently in the group with early seizure-onset age (onset age ≤ 2), asymmetric tonic limb posturing was detected as more frequent in the group with later seizure-onset age (onset age > 2; p < .005). In addition to this, semiologic signs were noted to be different between male and female groups; psychic and autonomic auras and ictal emotional signs were associated with women (p < .005).

Periictal water drinking revisited: Occurrence and lateralizing value in surgically confirmed patients with focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Periictal water drinking (PIWD), which is a rare seizure-related autonomic behavior, has been reported in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) but only rarely in extra-TLE. Additionally, the lateralizing value of PIWD is controversial. We aimed to clarify the occurrence and lateralizing value of PIWD in patients with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 240 focal epilepsy patients aged >10 years with a favorable postoperative seizure outcome (Engel class I). PIWD was defined as water drinking behavior during a seizure or within 2 min in the postictal phase. The occurrence of PIWD documented on video-electroencephalogram monitoring was assessed. The lateralizing value of PIWD was analyzed among patients whose language dominant hemisphere was identified. RESULTS: Twenty-three (9.5%) patients exhibited PIWD. PIWD occurred more frequently in frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE; eight of 41 patients, 19.5%) than in TLE (15 of 188 patients, 8%). The occurrence of PIWD was significantly different between FLE and extra-FLE (P = 0.035), with a low positive predictive value (34.8%). In FLE with PIWD, all but one patient underwent resective surgery involving the medial frontal lobe. In 194 patients whose language dominant hemisphere was determined, the lateralizing value of PIWD in FLE and TLE showed no statistical significance (P = 0.69 and P = 0.27, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: Periictal water drinking occurred more often in FLE than TLE. Thus, PIWD might not be a specific periictal symptom in TLE. There was no evidence for the lateralizing value of PIWD in FLE and TLE. These findings can provide useful clinical clues for preoperative evaluations to estimate the epileptogenic zone based on seizure semiology and allow for a better understanding of pathophysiological insights into PIWD.

Lateralizing and localizing value of seizure semiology: Comparison with scalp EEG, MRI and PET in patients successfully treated with resective epilepsy surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the lateralizing and localizing value of seizure semiology in patients who became completely seizure free after resective epilepsy surgery. METHODS: We analyzed seizures of patients who were seizure free after focal resection limited to the temporal lobe (30 patients), frontal lobe (27 patients), parietal lobe (8 patients) and occipital lobe (8 patients). Three investigators independently analyzed video segments of seizures blinded to clinical information and attempted to lateralize and localize the seizure focus, based on pre-defined criteria. Inter-observer agreement measured and positive predictive value were calculated and compared with scalp interictal, ictal EEG, MRI and PET. RESULTS: Seizure semiology correctly lateralized 19/30 (63%) temporal lobe epilepsy patients (kappa = 0.64); lobar localization was correct in 27/30 patients (90%) (Kappa = 0.6). Twenty of 27 (74%) frontal lobe patients were correctly lateralized (kappa = 0.55) and localized (Kappa = 0.41). Seven of 8 (87%) of parietal lobe patients were correctly lateralized (kappa = 0.83) and lobar localization was correct in 3/8 patients (37%) (Kappa = 0.5). Seven of 8 (87%) occipital lobe patients were correctly lateralized (kappa = 0.67) and lobar localization was correct in 7/8 patients (87%) (Kappa = 0.67). Collectively, seizure semiology was correctly lateralizing in 74% and correctly localizing in 77% of patients. Lateralization in secondarily generalized seizures was significantly higher compared to seizures that did not generalize (p = 0.0001). In non-lesional patients, lateralization was correct in 81% while localization was correct in 88% of patients. CONCLUSION: Seizure semiology has high lateralizing and localizing value, on par with interictal/ictal scalp EEG and MRI.

Lateralizing value of unilateral relative ictal immobility in patients with refractory focal seizures--Looking beyond unilateral automatisms.

PURPOSE: Ictal motor phenomena play a crucial role in the localization of seizure focus in the management of refractory focal epilepsy. While the importance of unilateral automatisms is well established, little attention is paid to the contralateral relatively immobile limb. In cases where automatisms mimic clonic or dystonic movements and in the absence of previously well-established signs, unilateral relative ictal immobility (RII) is potentially useful as a lateralizing sign. This study was carried out to examine the lateralizing value of this sign and to define its characteristics among patients of refractory focal epilepsy. METHODS: VEEGs of 69 consecutive patients of refractory focal epilepsy who had undergone epilepsy surgery at our center over last four years were reviewed and analyzed for the presence of RII. Unilateral RII was defined as a paucity of movement in one limb lasting for at least 10s while the contralateral limb showed purposive or semi-purposive movements (in the absence of tonic or dystonic posturing or clonic movements in the involved limb). The findings were seen in the light of VEEG, radiological and nuclear imaging data, and with post-surgical outcome. RESULTS: Unilateral RII as a lateralizing sign was found in 24 of 69 patients (34.78%), consisting of both temporal and extra temporal epilepsy, with 100% concordance with VEEG and MRI data. All patients demonstrating this sign had a good post-surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: RII, when well characterized is a frequent and reliable lateralizing sign in patients of refractory focal epilepsy.

Rhythmic ictal nonclonic hand (RINCH) motions in temporal lobe epilepsy: invasive EEG findings, incidence, and lateralizing value.

The main purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the incidence and lateralization value of rhythmic ictal nonclonic hand (RINCH) motions in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), who were classified as Engel I at least 2 years after epilepsy surgery. We analyzed the distribution of ictal activity at the time of RINCH appearance in patients in whom RINCH motions were present during invasive EEG monitoring. A group of 120 patients was included in this study. In total, we reviewed 491 seizures: 277 seizures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) associated with hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-HS group) and 214 in TLE caused by other lesions (TLE-OTH group). We analyzed 29 patients (79 of the seizures) during invasive EEG monitoring. Fisher's exact test and binomial test were used for the statistical analysis. RINCH motions were observed in 24 out of 120 patients (20%) and in 48 out of 491 seizures (9.8%). There was no significant difference between the occurrence of RINCH motions in patients with TLE-HS and in patients with TLE-OTH, or between gender, right/left-sided TLE, and language dominant/nondominant TLE. RINCH motions were contralateral to the seizure onset in 83.3% of patients and 91.7% of seizures (p=0.0015; p<0.001, respectively). There were no differences in the lateralizing value of RINCH motions in patients with TLE-HS or TLE-OTH. We analyzed RINCH motions in 5 patients/7 seizures during invasive EEG. In all 7 seizures with RINCH motions, we observed the widespread activation of the temporal lobe (mesial and lateral, opercular and polar regions) contralateral to the side of RINCH motions. In all 7 seizures, we observed that at the time of RINCH motion onset, at least 1 explored region of the frontal lobe was affected by the ictal activity. In 3 seizures, we observed time-locked epileptic activation associated with the appearance of RINCH motions, i.e., in the orbitofrontal cortex in 2 seizures and in both the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus in 1 seizure. RINCH motions are a relatively frequent ictal sign in patients with TLE. They have a high lateralizing value in these patients, occurring contralateral to the ictal onset. RINCH motions usually occur after the spread of ictal activity beyond the temporal lobe, and their appearance is usually associated with the presence of ictal activity in various regions of the contralateral frontal lobe, mainly the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus. This is the first study analysing this phenomenon during invasive EEG recording.