Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE The inability to significantly improve sagittal parameters has been a limitation of minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Traditional cages have a limited capacity to restore lordosis. This study evaluates the use of a crescent-shaped articulating expandable cage (Altera) for MIS TLIF. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 1- and 2-level MIS TLIF. Radiographic outcomes included differences in segmental and lumbar lordosis, disc height, evidence of fusion, and any endplate violations. Clinical outcomes included the numeric rating scale for leg and back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low-back pain. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients underwent single-level MIS TLIF, and 5 underwent 2-level MIS TLIF. The mean age was 63.1 years, with 64% women. On average, spondylolisthesis was corrected by 4.3 mm (preoperative = 6.69 mm, postoperative = 2.39 mm, p < 0.001), the segmental angle was improved by 4.94° (preoperative = 5.63°, postoperative = 10.58°, p < 0.001), and segmental height increased by 3.1 mm (preoperative = 5.09 mm, postoperative = 8.19 mm, p < 0.001). At 90 days after surgery the authors observed the following: a smaller postoperative sagittal vertical axis was associated with larger changes in back pain at 90 days (r = -0.558, p = 0.013); a larger decrease in spondylolisthesis was associated with greater improvements in ODI and back pain scores (r = -0.425, p = 0.043, and r = -0.43, p = 0.031, respectively); and a larger decrease in pelvic tilt (PT) was associated with greater improvements in back pain (r = -0.548, p = 0.043). For the 1-year PROs, the relationship between the change in PT and changes in ODI and numeric rating scale back pain were significant (r = 0.612, p = 0.009, and r = -0.803, p = 0.001, respectively) with larger decreases in PT associated with larger improvements in ODI and back pain. Overall for this study there was a 96% fusion rate. Fourteen patients were noted to have endplate violation on intraoperative fluoroscopy during placement of the cage. Only 3 of these had progression of their subsidence, with an overall subsidence rate of 6% (3 of 49) visible on postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS The use of this expandable, articulating, lordotic, or hyperlordotic interbody cage for MIS TLIF provides a significant restoration of segmental height and segmental lordosis, with associated improvements in sagittal balance parameters. Patients treated with this technique had acceptable levels of fusion and significant reductions in pain and disability.

Spinopelvic sagittal realignment and incidence of adjacent segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar inter-body fusion using 12° lordotic cages-a 2-year prospective cohort study.

Background: The importance of spinopelvic sagittal alignment for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion surgery has been reported. However, no longitudinal cohort studies have determined the extent to which segmental alignment and spinopelvic global alignment can be achieved using 12° lordotic cages in posterior lumbar inter-body fusion (PLIF) and the extent to which the development of ASD can be prevented. The purpose of this study was to analyze changes in segmental and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after single-segment PLIF with 12° lordotic cages, to clarify the relationship between changes in segmental and spinopelvic sagittal alignment, and to report the incidence of ASD at 2 years postoperatively. Methods: Subjects in this 2-year prospective longitudinal cohort study were 28 patients who had undergone L4/5 PLIF using 12° lordotic cages. Incidence of operative ASD (O-ASD) was evaluated as clinical outcomes. Radiological measurements were examined preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. The following radiographic spinopelvic parameters were measured: segmental lordosis (SL) at L4/5; sagittal vertical axis (SVA); T1 pelvic angle (TPA); thoracic kyphosis (TK); lumbar lordosis (LL); sacral slope (SS); pelvic tilt (PT); and pelvic incidence (PI). With respect to radiological outcomes, changes in SL (ΔSL) and spinopelvic parameters and the incidence of radiological ASD (R-ASD) were evaluated. Correlations of ΔSL and changes in other spinopelvic parameters (ΔSVA, ΔTPA, ΔTK, ΔLL, ΔSS, ΔPT, and ΔPI-LL) between preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively were examined. Results: The follow-up rate was 100% (n=28) at 1 year postoperatively and 96.4% (n=27) at 2 years postoperatively. No cases of O-ASD were seen during 2 years of follow-up. Significant realignment was observed and maintained at 2 years postoperatively in almost all spinopelvic sagittal parameters (SL, SVA, TPA, LL, PT, PI-LL). Regarding the correlation between ΔSL and other parameters, significant correlations were detected with ΔSVA (r=-0.37, P<0.05) and ΔLL (r=0.538, P<0.01). Three cases (11.1%) showed R-ASD at 2 years postoperatively. Conclusions: PLIF with 12° lordotic cages for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis improved SL and global sagittal realignment, and achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes with a low incidence of ASD during 2 years of follow-up.

Biomechanical changes at the adjacent segments induced by a lordotic porous interbody fusion cage.

Biomechanical changes at the adjacent segments after interbody fusion are common instigators of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). This study aims to investigate how the presence of a lordotic porous cage affects the biomechanical performance of the adjacent segments. A finite element model (FEM) of a lumbar spine implanted with a lordotic cage at L3-L4 was validated by in-vitro testing. The stress distribution on the cage and range of motion (ROM) of L3-L4 were used to assess the stability of the implant. Three angles of cage (0° = non-restoration, 7° = normal restoration and 11° = over-restoration) were modelled with different porosities (0%, 30% and 60%) and evaluated in the motions of flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation. The ROM, intervertebral disc pressure (IDP) and facet joint force (FJF) were used to evaluate biomechanical changes at the adjacent segments in each model. The results indicated that porous cages produced more uniform stress distribution, but cage porosity did not influence the ROM, IDP and FJF at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Increasing the cage lordotic angle acted to decrease the ROM and IDP, and increase the FJF of L4-L5, but did not alter the ROM of L2-L3. In conclusion, changes in ROM, IDP and FJF at the adjacent segments were mainly influenced by the lordotic angle of the cage and not by the porosity. A larger angle of lordotic cage was shown to reduce the ROM and IDP, and increase the FJF of the lower segment (L4-L5), but had little effect on the ROM of the upper segment (L2-L3).

Global Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after 1-3 Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion in Degenerative Spinal Diseases.

STUDY DESIGN: Level III retrospective study. PURPOSE: We investigated the impact of short-segment lumbar fusion on the restoration of global sagittal alignment and the correlations between spino-pelvic parameters and clinical outcomes. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Sagittal imbalance leads to energy consumption and pain in maintaining a standing position. For adult spinal deformity, it is critical to create optimal lumbar lordosis (LL) in order to achieve restoration of sagittal imbalance. However, surgeons do not pay attention to correcting LL in short-segment lumbar fusion. METHODS: A total of 69 patients with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spinal disease were evaluated with a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients underwent TLIF with hyper-lordotic angle cages to achieve higher LL. Radiological spino-pelvic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and clinical outcomes using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were evaluated. RESULTS: The average LL was 35.8°±9.9° before surgery, 42.3°±9.3° 1 year after surgery, and 40.3°±10.2° 2 years after surgery (p <0.01). The average SVA was 43.1±6.2 mm before surgery, 21.2±4.9 mm 1 year after surgery, and 34.0±4.7 mm 2 years after surgery (p <0.01). The average LL and SVA improved in two- or three-segment fusion, but not in one-segment fusion. The correlation between ΔLL and ΔSVA was significant in all segment fusions. The correlation between ΔLL and ΔSVA was more significant at the L4-5 and L5-S1 segments than at L3-4. ODI was significantly correlated with SVA (p <0.05). NRS showed no correlation with the radiological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Two- or three-segment lumbar fusion using hyper-lordotic angle cages improved LL and SVA. A significant correlation between the correction of LL and SVA was found. Higher correction of LL using hyper-lordotic angle cages is thus recommended in short-segment lumbar fusion, since postoperative improvements of SVA significantly affect clinical outcomes.

Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study.

Introduction Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is increasingly used to treat lumbar degenerative pathology. Its effect on sagittal parameters remains controversial. Static and expandable lordotic interbody devices (cages) were developed to improve segmental and overall lumbar lordosis. This study aimed to compare the radiographic and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between static lordotic and non-lordotic titanium cages in patients undergoing 1-2 level MI-TLIF for degenerative conditions.  Methods We reviewed consecutive eligible patients who underwent 1-2 level MI-TLIF (7/2017-11/2019) at a single institution by multiple surgeons. Standing X-rays and PROs were collected at preoperative, 1-month, and 6-month postoperative intervals. Using univariate analyses, we compared the two cohorts regarding confounders, radiographic parameters, and proportions of patients reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for PROs. Results One-hundred-twenty-five patients were reviewed. Forty-seven had lordotic and seventy-eight non-lordotic cages. The lordotic cohort was significantly younger than the non-lordotic (55.9 years vs. 60.7 years, p= 0.042). The baseline radiographic parameters were not significantly different between cohorts. At the preoperative-6-month interval, the lordotic cohort had significant improvement in lumbar lordosis versus non-lordotic cohort (2.95° ± 7.2° vs. -0.3° ± 7.1°, p=0.024). Both cohorts showed improvement in segmental lordosis, anterior and posterior interspace height, and low subsidence grade with no significant difference between cohorts at all intervals. Overall, 69.1-83.8% of patients achieved MCID in all PROs with no significant difference between cohorts. Conclusions The use of a static lordotic titanium cage in 1-2 level MI-TLIF did not result in significantly different radiographic improvements or PROs compared with a non-lordotic cage.