Is it too loud? Ask your brain!

PURPOSE: In this study, the objectification of the subjective perception of loudness was investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). In particular, the emergence of objective markers in the domain of the acoustic discomfort threshold was examined. METHODS: A cohort of 27 adults with normal hearing, aged between 18 and 30, participated in the study. The participants were presented with 500 ms long noise stimuli via in-ear headphones. The acoustic signals were presented with sound levels of [55, 65, 75, 85, 95 dB]. After each stimulus, the subjects provided their subjective assessment of the perceived loudness using a colored scale on a touchscreen. EEG signals were recorded, and afterward, event-related potentials (ERPs) locked to sound onset were analyzed. RESULTS: Our findings reveal a linear dependency between the N100 components and both the sound level and the subjective loudness categorization of the sound. Additionally, the data demonstrated a nonlinear relationship between the P300 potential and the sound level as well as for the subjective loudness rating. The P300 potential was elicited exclusively when the stimuli had been subjectively rated as "very loud" or "too loud". CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study suggest the possibility of the identification of the subjective uncomfortable loudness level by objective neural parameters.

Effects of fundamental frequency changes on spoken sound loudness.

This study aimed to investigate the perception of loudness in response to changes in fundamental frequency (F0) in spoken sounds, as well as the influence of linguistic background on this perceptual process. The results revealed that participants perceived changes in F0 to have accompanying changes in loudness, with a trend of lower F0 sounds being perceived as louder than higher F0 sounds. This finding contrasts with previous studies on pure tones, where increases in frequency typically led to increases in loudness. Furthermore, the study examined differences between two distinct groups of participants: Chinese-speaking and English-speaking individuals. It was observed that English-speaking participants exhibited a greater sensitivity to minor intensity changes compared to Chinese-speaking participants. This discrepancy in sensitivity suggests that linguistic background may play a significant role in shaping the perception of loudness in spoken sound. The study's findings contribute to our understanding of how F0 variations are perceived in terms of loudness, and highlight the potential impact of language experience on this perceptual process.

The Cambridge aided loudness profile (CALP): item choices and data for unaided listening by young and older normal-hearing listeners and older hearing-impaired listeners.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an improved version of the profile of aided loudness (PAL), intended for assessment of the appropriateness of the loudness of everyday sounds. DESIGN: Initially, 16 participants with a range of ages and degrees of hearing loss indicated whether they encountered each situation described in the PAL and how specific they considered the description to be. Based on the responses, most situations from the PAL were eliminated and new situations were introduced, giving the Cambridge Aided Loudness Profile (CALP). The CALP was administered to 80 young and 22 older participants with normal hearing, who rated the loudness of each situation and satisfaction with this loudness (as for the original PAL). Satisfaction was strongly negatively correlated with loudness, suggesting that satisfaction was largely based on loudness. The CALP was then administered to 32 new young normal-hearing participants and 49 older participants with hearing loss, most of whom used hearing aids, who rated loudness and the appropriateness of loudness. RESULTS: Some situations were rated as loud but appropriate in loudness, indicating that the CALP can distinguish these aspects. CONCLUSIONS: The CALP questions were understood by all participants. The CALP may be useful for assessing the appropriateness of loudness.

Narrative analysis in individuals with Parkinson's disease following intensive voice treatment: secondary outcome variables from a randomized controlled trial.

Communication is often impaired in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), typically secondary to sensorimotor deficits impacting voice and speech. Language may also be diminished in PD, particularly for production and comprehension of verbs. Evidence exists that verb processing is influenced by motor system modulation suggesting that verb deficits in PD are underpinned by similarities in the neural representations of actions that span motor and semantic systems. Conversely, subtle differences in cognition in PD may explain difficulty in processing of complex syntactic forms, which increases cognitive demand and is linked to verb use. Here we investigated whether optimizing motor system support for vocal function (improving loudness) affects change in lexical semantic, syntactic, or informativeness aspects of spoken discourse. Picture description narratives were compared for 20 Control participants and 39 with PD, 19 of whom underwent Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD®). Treated PD narratives were also contrasted with those of untreated PD and Control participants at Baseline and after treatment. Controls differed significantly from the 39 PD participants for verbs per utterance, but this difference was largely driven by untreated PD participants who produced few utterances but with verbs, inflating their verbs per utterance. Given intervention, there was a significant increase in vocal loudness but no significant changes in language performance. These data do not support the hypothesis that targeting this speech motor system results in improved language production. Instead, the data provide evidence of considerable variability in measures of language production across groups, particularly in verbs per utterance.

Voice self-assessment in individuals with Parkinson's Disease as compared to general voice disorders.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with Parkinson's Disease (IwPD) often fail to adjust their voice in different situations, without awareness of this limitation. Clinicians use self-report questionnaires that are typically designed for individuals with General Voice Disorders (GVD) in the vocal assessment of IwPD. However, these instruments may not consider that IwPD have a reduced self-perception of their vocal deficits. This study aimed to compare self-reported vocal symptoms and voice loudness between IwPD and GVD. METHODS: 28 IwPD and 26 with GVD completed the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) questionnaire to evaluate their voice self-perception. Vocal loudness (dB) was also assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the outcomes from these measures between the two groups. Principal Component Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis were applied to explore data patterns related to voice symptoms. RESULTS: IwPD reported significantly fewer vocal symptoms than those with GVD in all VoiSS questionnaire domains. Multivariate principal component analysis found no significant correlations between VoiSS scores and participant similarities in voice measures. Despite experiencing hypophonia, IwPD scored lower in all VoiSS domains but still fell in the healthy voice range. Hierarchical Clustering Analysis grouped participants into three distinct categories, primarily based on age, vocal loudness, and VoiSS domain scores, distinguishing between PD and GVD individuals. CONCLUSIONS: IwPD reported fewer vocal symptoms than GVD. The voice self-assessment seems to be unreliable to assess vocal symptoms in IwPD, at least regarding loudness. New self-report instruments tailored to PD individuals are needed due to their particular voice characteristics.

Difference between Quantitative Electroencephalography, Loudness Dependence of Auditory Evoked Potential, and Mismatch Negativity between a Manic and a Depressive Episode in a Single Bipolar Patient with Mixed Features.

This study compares the changes in Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG), loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP), and mismatch negativity (MMN) in the case of bipolar depression, mania, and euthymia in a single patient. the characteristic of QEEG in this patient with mixed depression was an increase in alpha; in mixed mania, there was little increase in alpha, and the decrease in delta, theta, and beta was noticeable. LDAEP increased more in the manic phase than in the depressive phase. In contrast, MMN decreased more in the manic than in the depressive phase. After remission of mania, QEEG, LDAEP, and MMN were re-measured. Compared with the manic phase, the decrease in delta, theta, and beta bands in the occipital, temporal, and parietal lobes improved significantly. The LDAEP decreased from LDAEP 1.67 to 0.97. However, in spite of the euthymic phase, MMN amplitude showed a further decrease, from -1.7 to -0.9. In conclusion, using QEEG, LDAEP, and MMN can help clinicians predict a patient's bipolar state and evaluate serotonin intensity and cognitive function, enabling customized treatment. However, there are still few consistent research results; therefore, there is a need to utilize a larger sample size.

The Influence of Noise Exposure at Different Loudness Levels on EEG Index and Types of Attention.

Bachground: Noise is one of the most important harmful factors in the environment. There are limited studies on the effect of noise loudness on brain signals and attention. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between exposure to different loudness levels with brain index, types of attention, and subjective evaluation. Methods: Four noises with different loudness levels were generated. Sixty-four male students participated in this study. Each subject performed the integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test (IVA-2) test before and during exposure to noise loudness signals while their electroencephalography was recorded. Finally, the alpha-to-gamma ratio (AGR), five types of attention, and the subjective evaluation results were examined. Results: During exposure to loudness levels, the AGR and types of attention decreased while the NASA-Tax Load Index (NASA-TLX) scores increased. The noise exposure at lower loudness levels (65 and 75 phon) leads to greater attention dysfunction than at higher loudness. The AGR was significantly changed during exposure to 65 and 75 phon and audio stimuli. This significant change was observed in exposure at all loudness levels except 85 phon and visual stimuli. The divided and sustained attention changed significantly during exposure to all loudness levels and visual stimuli. The AGR had a significant inverse correlation with the total score of NASA-TLX during noise exposure. Conclusions: These results can lead to the design of methods to control the psychological effects of noise at specific frequencies (250 and 4000 Hz) and can prevent non-auditory damage to human cognitive performance in industrial and urban environments.

Relación entre hiperacusia y desorden del procesamiento auditivo central: Una revisión de la literatura / Relationship between hyperacusis and auditory processing disorder: a literature review

Resumen La hiperacusia corresponde a la excesiva sensibilidad auditiva o intolerancia a ciertos sonidos cotidianos que para la mayoría de las personas parecerían habituales. Considerando los mecanismos fisiológicos involucrados en el origen de la hiperacusia, es lógico pensar que su presencia podría afectar algunas habilidades del procesamiento auditivo central, sin embargo, la evidencia en torno al tema es escasa y no existe actualmente una revisión de la literatura que agrupe las investigaciones sobre esta temática. Por ello, el presente estudio pretende identificar y analizar la evidencia científica disponible sobre la relación entre hiperacusia y desorden del procesamiento auditivo central. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura guiada por protocolo PRISMA en las bases de datos Proquest, Ebsco, Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library y Scielo de acuerdo con términos claves. Fueron incluidos artículos originales de investigación, revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, publicados desde el año 2010, realizados en animales y humanos, escritos en idiomas inglés, español y portugués. Se encontraron 323 estudios relacionados con los términos claves utilizados, de los cuales 13 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y fueron analizados. Se puede concluir que la evidencia científica en torno al tema es escasa e incipiente. Estructuras de la vía auditiva central como núcleos cocleares, lemnisco lateral, colículos inferiores, cuerpo geniculado medial y corteza auditiva primaria estarían relacionadas con la hiperacusia, así como también habilidades de procesamiento auditivo de figura/fondo, ordenación temporal y transferencia interhemisférica se verían afectadas.

Abstract Hyperacusis has been defined as the excessive auditory sensitivity or intolerance to certain everyday sounds that seem common for most people. Considering the underlying physiological mechanisms of hyperacusis, it is reasonable to think that it could affect some abilities involved in the central auditory processing. However, there is lack of evidence about this topic, and there is no literature review that gathers all the existing research. Therefore, the current study intends to identify and analyze the available scientific evidence regarding the relationship between hyperacusis and central auditory processing disorder. The review of the literature followed the PRISMA protocol, using key words in Proquest, Ebsco, Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library and Scielo databases. Original research articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies made with human and animals that have been published since 2010 in English, Spanish and Portuguese were included. Among them, 323 studies were related to the key terms, out of which 13 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. It is possible to conclude that there is little and incipient scientific evidence on the topic. Structures of the central auditory pathway such as cochlear nuclei, lateral lemniscus, inferior colliculi, medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex seem to be related to hyperacusis; auditory processing skills such as figure/ground discrimination, temporal ordering and interhemispheric transfer appear to be affected as well.

Comparison of Relative Loudness Judgment in Children using Listening Devices with Typically Developing Children

Abstract Introduction Loudness perception is considered important for the perception of emotions, relative distance and stress patterns. However, certain digital hearing devices worn by those with hearing impairment may affect their loudness perception. This could happen in devices that have compression circuits to make loud sounds soft and soft sounds loud. These devices could hamper children from gaining knowledge about loudness of acoustical signals. Objective To compare relative loudness judgment of children using listening devices with age-matched typically developing children. Methods The relative loudness judgment of sounds created by day-to-day objects were evaluated on 60 children (20 normal-hearing, 20 hearing aid users, & 20 cochlear implant users), utilizing a standard group comparison design. Using a two-alternate forced-choice technique, the children were required to select picturized sound sources that were louder. Results The majority of the participants obtained good scores and poorer scores were mainly obtained by children using cochlear implants. The cochlear implant users obtained significantly lower scores than the normal-hearing participants. However, the scores were not significantly different between the normal-hearing children and the hearing aid users as well as between the two groups with hearing impairment. Conclusion Thus, despite loudness being altered by listening devices, children using non-linear hearing aids or cochlear implants are able to develop relative loudness judgment for acoustic stimuli. However, loudness growth for electrical stimuli needs to be studied.

Utilidad de mediciones objetivas para la programación en implantes cocleares / Use of objective measures for cochlear implant programming

RESUMEN Introducción: La programación adecuada de los implantes cocleares permiten lograr niveles de estimulación auditivos óptimos. Se realiza de forma individualizada, siendo la detección del umbral de confort ideal un desafío. Se ha descrito la utilidad de los potenciales auditivos del tronco encefálico eléctrico (ePEATC) y el reflejo eléctrico estapedial (eREE) para este propósito. Objetivo: Determinar la posibilidad de realizar ePEATC y eREE en pacientes adultos y pediátricos con implantes cocleares, y evaluar cambios en la programación de los implantes cocleares luego de las mediciones objetivas. Material y método: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, descriptivo, de pacientes con implante coclear marca MED-EL®, separando los pacientes en dos grupos: el grupo adulto (n =5) y el grupo pediátrico (n =5). Todos los pacientes incluidos presentaron más de 6 meses de encendido del implante. Se evaluaron variables epidemiológicas y tiempo de encendido del implante. Se realizó una otoscopía, prueba básica de funcionamiento del implante, y las mediciones objetivas eléctricas (ePEATC, eREE). Con estos resultados se ajustó el umbral de confort. Resultados: El tiempo promedio de encendido del implante en el grupo adulto fue de 27 meses, y 30 meses en el grupo pediátrico. El ePEATC requiere más tiempo y cooperación al compararlo con eREE. Luego de estas evaluaciones objetivas, fue necesario el ajuste del umbral de confort en tres pacientes adultos, y en dos pacientes pediátricos. Fue necesario realizar una audiometría de campo libre para estimar el umbral de confort en dos pacientes pediátricos que no presentaron respuesta en eREE. Conclusión: Fue posible realizar estas mediciones objetivas en pacientes adultos y pediátricos, siendo mejor tolerado y requiriendo menos tiempo, el eREE.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Mapping a cochlear implant allows for adjusting ideal electrical stimulation limits. It is an individualized process and detecting the most comfortable loudness level can be challenging. The use of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ePEATC) and electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds (eREE) have been considered for this purpose. Aim: To determine the feasibility of performing ePEATC and eREE on adult and pediatric patients with a cochlear implant, and to evaluate changes in programming following these objective measures. Material and method: A prospective, descriptive study was completed, of patients with MED-EL® cochlear implants, separating patients into two groups: adults (n=5) and children (n=5). All of the patients included had their implants activated for 6 months or longer. Epidemiological variables and duration of implant activation were evaluated. Otoscopy, a basic implant functioning evaluation, and objective measures (ePEATC, eREE) were performed. With these results, comfortable loudness levels were adjusted. Results: Average duration of implant activation was 27 months and 30 months, for adults and children respectively. Performing ePEATC required more time and cooperation as compared to eREE. Following the objective measures, adjustment of the comfortable loudness levels was required for three adult and two pediatric patients. Sound field audiometry was necessary for two pediatric patients in order to estimate the comfortable loudness levels because the eREE responses were absent. Conclusions: It is feasible to perform these objective measures for both adult and pediatric patients, with eREE requiring less time and being better tolerated by patients.

Influência da retroalimentação auditiva nos parâmetros acústicos vocais de indivíduos sem queixas vocais / Influence of auditory feedback in the vocal acoustic parameters of individuals without vocal complaints

RESUMO Introdução: A qualidade da emissão vocal é dependente da integridade do mecanismo de retroalimentação auditiva. A presença de eventuais falhas nesse mecanismo está relacionada à indução do abuso e/ ou mau uso vocal e, por conseguinte, do surgimento de quadros de disfonia. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência da retroalimentação auditiva na intensidade e na frequência da voz, em indivíduos sem queixas vocais. Métodos: Participaram da pesquisa 40 sujeitos do gênero feminino, sem queixas vocais e com limiares auditivos dentro dos padrões de normalidade. As participantes foram submetidas a uma avaliação auditiva, composta por audiometria tonal liminar, imitanciometria e por uma avaliação acústica vocal dos parâmetros de intensidade e frequência, realizada em três momentos: antes, durante e após a exposição ao ruído branco. Resultados: Houve diferença significativa na relação das médias obtidas na intensidade e entre o limiar dos reflexos acústicos contralaterais e as frequências vocais, nos três momentos da avaliação acústica. Conclusão: Os achados sugerem que a retroalimentação auditiva interfere no controle da intensidade e frequência vocal.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The quality of the vocal emission is dependent on the integrity of the auditory feedback mechanism of the presence of eventual failures is related to the induction of abuse and / or vocal misuse, and therefore of the surgeon of dysphonia. Purpose: To evaluate the influence of auditory feedback in voice intensity and frequency in individuals with no vocal complaints. Methods: Participants were 40 female subjects without vocal and auditory thresholds within normal standards complaints. Participants underwent an auditory evaluation composed of pure tone audiometry, tympanometry and a vocal acoustic assessment of intensity and frequency parameters, carried out in three stages: before, during and after exposure to white noise. Results: There was significant difference in the average of the ratio obtained in intensity and between the threshold of contralateral acoustic reflexes and vocal frequencies in the three moments of acoustic evaluation. Conclusion: Thus, the findings suggest that auditory feedback interferes with the control of the intensity and vocal frequency.

Análise das modificações vocais de repórteres na situação de ruído / Analysis of reporters' vocal changes in the presence of noise

OBJETIVO: Verificar e comparar a ocorrência das modificações vocais de repórteres e não-repórteres na presença de ruído mascarante. MÉTODOS:Participaram 46 sujeitos, sendo 23 repórteres e 23 não-repórteres (grupo controle), todos com audição normal. Os participantes deveriam ler um trecho de uma matéria de telejornal em três situações de escuta: sem ruído mascarante, com ruído de 50 dB, e com ruído de 90 dB. As narrações foram gravadas e submetidas à avaliação perceptivo-auditiva (realizada por uma fonoaudióloga especialista em voz) e análise acústica (medidas extraídas por meio do Software Voxmetria - CTS Informática). RESULTADOS: Com 50 dB de mascaramento, houve maior aumento nos parâmetros pitch (82,6%), loudness (91,3%) e tensão (82,6%) no grupo controle, quando este foi comparado ao grupo dos repórteres. O mesmo ocorreu com ruído de 90 dB para os parâmetros pitch (95,7%), loudness (100%) e tensão (91,3%). CONCLUSÃO: As consequências negativas do efeito Lombard ocorrem em ambos os grupos, porém, pelas respostas apresentadas, os repórteres demonstram conseguir inibir parcialmente o impacto negativo das situações de ruído, por provável estabilidade da emissão profissional e ativação de outras vias de monitoramento.

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the occurrence of vocal changes in the presence of masking noise between reporters and other professionals. METHODS: Participants were 46 subjects with normal hearing, 23 reporters (study group) and 23 non-reporters (control group). Participants read an excerpt from a TV news broadcast in three listening situations: without masking noise, with 50 dB white noise, and with 90 dB white noise. The narrations were recorded and then submitted to auditory-perceptual and acoustic analyses. The auditory-perceptual analysis was performed by a speech-language pathologist specialized in voice. The acoustic analysis used the software Voxmetria (CTS Informática) to perform the acoustic measurements. RESULTS: In the situation with 50 dB masking noise, individuals in the control group had higher increase of the following parameters, when compared to the group of reporters: pitch (82.6%), loudness (91.3%), and strain (82.6%). The same occurred in the situation with 90 dB masking noise for the same parameters: pitch (95.7%), loudness (100%) and strain (91.3%). CONCLUSION: The negative consequences of the Lombard effect occur in both groups; however, reporters showed the ability to partially inhibit the negative impact of noise situations, probably due to the stability of the professional speech production and activation of other feedback pathways.

Desempenho de adultos jovens normais em dois testes de resolução temporal / Performance of normal young adults in two temporal resolution tests

TEMA: o processamento auditivo temporal se refere a percepção de um evento sonoro ou de uma alteração no mesmo, dentro de um intervalo definido de tempo e é considerado uma habilidade fundamental na percepção auditiva de sons verbais e não verbais, na percepção de música, ritmo e pontuação e na discriminação de pitch, de duração e de fonemas. OBJETIVO: realizar um estudo comparativo do desempenho de adultos jovens normais nos testes de resolução temporal, Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) e Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) e analisar diferenças entre esses dois métodos de avaliação. MÉTODO: 25 universitários, 11 homens e 14 mulheres, com audição normal e sem histórico de alterações educacionais, neurológicas e/ou linguagem, foram submetidos ao RGDT e ao GIN, a 40dB NS. RESULTADO: observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante entre os sexos sendo que as mulheres apresentaram pior desempenho nos dois testes. No estudo comparativo dos resultados do RGDT e GIN, observaram-se diferenças significativas no desempenho da amostra. De maneira geral, os limiares de detecção de gap no teste GIN foram melhores do que os limiares obtidos no RGDT. CONCLUSÃO: o sexo masculino teve melhor desempenho tanto no teste RGDT quanto no GIN, quando comparado ao feminino. Além disso, não houve diferença significante nas repostas do GIN nas orelhas direita e esquerda. Os sujeitos deste estudo tiveram melhor desempenho no teste GIN, quando comparado ao RGDT, tanto no sexo masculino quanto no feminino. Portanto, o teste GIN apresentou vantagens sobre o RGDT não apenas quanto à sua validade e sensibilidade, mas também com relação a sua aplicação e correção dos resultados.

BACKGROUND: temporal auditory processing is defined as the perception of sound or of sound alteration within a restricted time interval and is considered a fundamental ability for the auditory perception of verbal and non verbal sounds, for the perception of music, rhythm, periodicity and in the discrimination of pitch, duration and of phonemes. AIM: to compare the performance of normal Brazilian adults in two temporal resolution tests: the Gaps-in-Noise Test (GIN) and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), and to analyze potential differences of performance in these two tests. METHOD: twenty-five college students with normal hearing (11 males and 14 females) and no history of educational, neurological and/or language problems, underwent the GIN and RGDT at 40dB SL. RESULTS: statistically significant gender effects for both tests were found, with female participants showing poorer performance on both temporal processing tests. In addition, a comparative analysis of the results obtained in the GIN and RGDT revealed significant differences in the threshold measures derived for these two tests. In general, significantly better gap detection thresholds were observed for both male and female participants on the GIN test when compared to the results obtained for the RGDT. CONCLUSION: male participants presented better performances on both RGDT and GIN, when compared to the females. There were no differences in performance between right and left ears on the GIN test. Participants of the present investigation, males and females, performed better on the GIN when compared to the RGDT. The GIN presented advantages over the RGDT, not only in terms of clinical validity and sensibility, but also in terms of application and scoring.