Assessment of volume status of pediatric hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Accurate volume status assessment and dry weight achievement are the most challenging goals for a nephrologist. We aimed to evaluate the role of ultrasonographic parameters including lung ultrasound and inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements as practical methods of volume status assessment in children on hemodialysis by comparing them with established techniques, such as clinical evaluation and bioimpedance spectroscopy. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study compared pre- and post-dialysis volume status using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) parameters and clinical data with ultrasonographic lung B-lines and IVC parameters in children on regular hemodialysis. RESULTS: A total 60 children (mean age 9.4 ± 2.8 years) were enrolled. Twenty patients (33.3%) were clinically overloaded to varying degrees (17 patients had mild to moderate signs of fluid overload and 3 patients had moderate to severe signs of fluid overload). All other patients (66.7%) were clinically euvolemic. Sonographic parameters were significantly lower post-dialysis than pre-dialysis, including lung B-line count and IVC diameter. IVC collapsibility index mean was significantly higher post-dialysis than pre-dialysis. There was a significant correlation between the lung B-line count, IVC parameters, and BIS-measured overhydration both before and after hemodialysis. Nine patients had ≥ 8 B-lines post-dialysis, only three of them were hypertensive. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical criteria alone are not specific for determining accurate fluid status in pediatric hemodialysis patients. Lung B-line score, IVC parameters, and BIS may be complementary to each other and to clinical data. Lung B-lines outperform IVC measurements and BIS in subclinical volume overload detection in pediatric hemodialysis patients.

Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings. DESIGN: A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020). SETTINGS AND SUBJECTS: Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS. CONCLUSIONS: LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.

Evolution of Ultrasound-Assessed Lung Aeration and Gas Exchange in Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Transient Tachypnea of the Neonate.

OBJECTIVE: To use clinical, lung ultrasound, and gas exchange data to clarify the evolution of lung aeration and function in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and transient tachypnea of the neonate (TTN), the most common types of neonatal respiratory failure. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational cohort study, lung aeration and function were measured with a semiquantitative lung ultrasound score (LUS) and transcutaneous blood gas measurement performed at 1 hour (time point 0), 6 hours (time point 1), 12 hours (time point 2), 24 hours (time point 3) and 72 hours (time point 4) of life. Endogenous surfactant was estimated using lamellar body count (LBC). LUS, oxygenation index (OI), oxygen saturation index (OSI), and transcutaneous pressure of carbon dioxide (PtcCO2) were the primary outcomes. All results were adjusted for gestational age. RESULTS: Sixty-nine neonates were enrolled in the RDS cohort, and 58 neonates were enrolled in the TTN cohort. LUS improved over time (within-subjects, P < .001) but was worse for the RDS cohort than for the TTN cohort at all time points (between-subjects, P < .001). Oxygenation improved over time (within-subjects, P = .011 for OI, P < .001 for OSI) but was worse for the RDS cohort than for the TTN cohort at all time points (between-subjects, P < .001 for OI and OSI). PtcCO2 improved over time (within-subjects, P < .001) and was similar in the RDS and TTN cohorts at all time points. Results were unchanged after adjustment for gestational age. LBC was associated with RDS (ß = -0.2 [95% CI, -0.004 to -0.0001]; P = .037) and LUS (ß = -3 [95% CI, -5.5 to -0.5]; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: For the first 72 hours of life, the RDS cohort had worse lung aeration and oxygenation compared with the TTN cohort at all time points. CO2 clearance did not differ between the cohorts, whereas both lung aeration and function improved in the first 72 hours of life.

Effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia: a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a common cause of morbidity. Postoperative atelectasis is thought to be a significant risk factor in their development. Recent imaging studies suggest that patients' extubation may result in similar postoperative atelectasis regardless of the intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy used. In this pilot trial, we hypothesized that a study investigating the effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional one on PPCs would be feasible. METHODS: We conducted a pilot, single-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Adult patients at moderate to high risk of PPCs and scheduled for elective surgery were eligible. Patients were randomized to an open lung extubation strategy (semirecumbent position, fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] 50%, pressure support ventilation, unchanged positive end-expiratory pressure) or to a conventional extubation strategy (dorsal decubitus position, FIO2 100%, manual bag ventilation). The primary feasibility outcome was global protocol adherence while the primary exploratory efficacy outcome was PPCs. RESULTS: We randomized 35 patients to the conventional extubation group and 34 to the open lung extubation group. We observed a global protocol adherence of 96% (95% confidence interval, 88 to 99), which was not different between groups. Eight PPCs occurred (two in the conventional extubation group vs six in the open lung extubation group). Less postoperative supplemental oxygen and better lung aeration were observed in the open lung extubation group. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre pilot trial, we observed excellent feasibility. A multicentre pilot trial comparing the effect of an open lung extubation strategy with that of a conventional extubation strategy on the occurrence of PPCs is feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); registered 6 August 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les complications pulmonaires postopératoires (CPP) sont une cause fréquente de morbidité. L'atélectasie postopératoire est considérée comme un facteur de risque important de CPP. Des études d'imagerie récentes suggèrent que l'extubation des patient·es peut entraîner une atélectasie postopératoire semblable, quelle que soit la stratégie de ventilation mécanique peropératoire utilisée. Dans cet essai pilote, nous avons émis l'hypothèse qu'une étude examinant les effets sur les CPP d'une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert par rapport à une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle serait réalisable. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude randomisée contrôlée pilote, monocentrique et à double insu. Les patient·es adultes présentant un risque modéré à élevé de CPP et devant bénéficier d'une chirurgie non urgente étaient éligibles. Les patient·es ont été randomisé·es à une prise en charge par une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert (position semi-couchée, fraction d'oxygène inspiré [FIO2] 50 %, ventilation par aide inspiratoire, pression positive télé-expiratoire inchangée) ou à une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle (décubitus dorsal, FIO2 100 %, ventilation manuelle par masque). Le principal critère de faisabilité était l'adhésion au protocole global, tandis que les CPP constituaient le principal critère d'efficacité exploratoire. RéSULTATS: Nous avons randomisé 35 patient·es dans le groupe d'extubation conventionnelle et 34 dans le groupe d'extubation à poumon ouvert. Nous avons observé une adhésion globale au protocole de 96 % (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 88 à 99), qui n'était pas différente entre les groupes. Huit CPP sont survenues (deux dans le groupe d'extubation conventionnelle vs six dans le groupe d'extubation à poumon ouvert). Nous avons observé des besoins moins importants en oxygène supplémentaire postopératoire et une meilleure aération pulmonaire dans le groupe extubé à poumon ouvert. CONCLUSION: Dans cet essai pilote monocentrique, nous avons observé une excellente faisabilité. Une étude pilote multicentrique comparant l'effet d'une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert à celui d'une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle sur la survenue de CPP est réalisable. DATE D'ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); enregistrée le 6 août 2021.

Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery, which results in less bleeding, less postoperative pain, and better cosmetic results, may affect the lung dynamics via the pneumoperitoneum. After laparoscopic surgery, atelectasis develops. The primary aim of the present study is to demonstrate the effects of two different ventilation modes on the development of atelectasis using lung ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes include the plateau pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and compliance differences between the groups. Materials and Methods: In this study, 62 participants aged 18-75 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (group V) or the pressure-controlled-volume guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) group (group PV). The lung ultrasound score (LUS) was obtained thrice: prior to induction (T1), upon the patient's initial arrival in the recovery room (T2), and just before departing the recovery unit (T3). The hemodynamic data and mechanical ventilation parameters were recorded at different times intraoperatively. Results: The LUS score was similar between the groups at all the times. The change in the LUS score of the right lower anterior chest was statistically higher in the VCV group than the PCV group. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was found to be statistically higher in the V group than the PV group five minutes after induction (T5) (20.84 ± 4.32 p = 0.021). The plateau pressure was found to be higher in the V group than the PV group at all times (after induction (Tind) 17.29 ± 5.53 p = 0.004, (T5) 17.77 ± 4.89 p = 0.001, after pneumoperitoneum (TPP) 19.71 ± 4.28 p = 0.002). Compliance was found to be statistically higher in the PV group than the V group at all times ((Tind) 48.87 ± 15.37 p = 0.011, (T5) 47.94 ± 13.71 p = 0.043, (TPP) 35.65 ± 6.90 p = 0.004). Before and after the pneumoperitoneum, the compliance was determined to be lower in the V group than the PV group, respectively (40.68 ± 13.91 p = 0.043, 30.77 ± 5.73 p = 0.004). Conclusions: LUS score was similar between groups at all times. The PCV-VG mode was superior to the VCV mode in providing optimal ventilatory pressures and maintaining high dynamic compliance in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Lung Ultrasound and High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Suspected COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Comparison.

Objective: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography (LUS) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), to detect COVID-19. Materials and Methods: This study recruited all patients admitted to the emergency medicine unit, due to a suspected COVID-19 infection, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients also who underwent a standardized LUS examination and a chest HRCT. The signs detected by both LUS and HRCT were reported, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for LUS and HRCT. Results: This cohort included 159 patients, 101 (63%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients showed more often confluent subpleural consolidations and parenchymal consolidations in lower lung regions of LUS. They also had "ground glass" opacities and "crazy paving" on HRCT, while pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidations were more common in non-COVID-19 patients. LUS had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and a specificity of 0.24 (95% CI 0.07-0.5) for COVID-19 lung infections. HRCT abnormalities resulted in a 0.98 sensitivity (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and 0.1 specificity (95% CI 0.04-0.23) for COVID-19 lung infections. Conclusion: In this cohort, LUS proved to be a noninvasive, diagnostic tool with high sensitivity for lung abnormalities that were likewise detected by HRCT. Furthermore, LUS, despite its lower specificity, has a high sensitivity for COVID-19, which could prove to be as effective as HRCT in excluding a COVID-19 lung infection.

Semi-quantitative lung ultrasound score during ground transportation of outborn neonates with respiratory failure.

Lung ultrasound score (LUS) is increasingly diffused in neonatal critical care but scanty data are available about its use during transfer of severely ill neonates. We aimed to clarify the effect of ground transportation on LUS evolution, conformity of interpretation, and relationships with oxygenation and clinical severity. This is a single-center, blinded, observational, cross-sectional study. Neonates of any gestational age with respiratory distress appearing within 24 h from birth were transferred by a mobile unit towards neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a tertiary referral center. Calculation of LUS prior to the transportation (T1), in the mobile unit (T2), at the end of transportation (T3), and finally upon NICU admission. LUS in the mobile unit and in the NICU was performed by different physicians blinded to each other's results. LUS did not change overtime (T1: 6.3 (3.5), T2: 6.1 (3.5), T3: 5.8 (3.4); p = 0.479; adjusted for gestational or postnatal age or transport duration: p = 0.951, p = 0.424, and 0.266, respectively) but reliably predicted surfactant need (AUC at T1: 0.833 (95%CI: 0.72-0.92); AUC at T2: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.70-0.91); AUC at T3: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.70-0.90); p always < 0.0001). There were significant agreement (ICC = 0.912 (95%CI: 0.83-0.95); p < 0.001) and correlation (r = 0.905, p < 0.001) between LUS calculated during transportation and in the NICU. LUS during transportation was also significantly correlated with oxygenation index (r = 0.321, p = 0.026; standardized B = 0.397 (95%CI: 0.03-0.76), p = 0.048) and TRIPS-II score (r = 0.302, p = 0.008; standardized B = 0.568 (95%CI: 0.04-1.1), p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: LUS during ground transportation of neonates with respiratory failure is suitable and not influenced by the transportation itself. It has a high agreement with that calculated in the NICU and correlates with patients' oxygenation and severity. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung ultrasound is a part of the point-of-care ultrasound, which is becoming an essential tool, to manage critically ill neonates and children in an accurate, non-invasive and quick way. WHAT IS NEW: • Lung ultrasound score (LUS) is suitable during transportation of critically ill neonates with respiratory failure and is not influenced by the transportation itself. • LUS has a high agreement with that calculated in the NICU and correlates with patients' oxygenation and severity of respiratory failure.

Lung ultrasonography decreases radiation exposure in newborns with respiratory distress: a retrospective cohort study.

Chest X-ray (CXR) is commonly used as a first-line imaging method to determine the cause of respiratory distress in NICUs. The aim of the study was to retrospectively assess the decrease in the number of CXRs performed due to the use of lung ultrasonography on the first day of life for newborns with respiratory distress. Infants who were admitted to the NICU on the first day of life due to respiratory distress were enrolled in this study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04722016) and divided into two groups: the study group (n = 104) included patients born between January 2019 and June 2020, and the historical control group (n = 73) included patients born between June 2017 and December 2018. As a first-line technique for lung imaging, only CXR had been used in the historical control group, whereas ultrasound had been preferred in the study group. The radiation dose to the newborns and the number of CXRs performed in the first day of life were compared between the two groups. Significant reductions in the number of CXRs performed and radiation exposure were observed in the study group. The radiation dose decreased from 5.54 to 4.47 µGy per baby when LUS was routinely used. The proportion of patients who underwent CXR decreased from 100 to 71.2%.Conclusion: We observed that using lung ultrasonography as a first-line evaluation method in neonates with respiratory distress decreased both the number of CXRs performed and radiation exposure. What is Known: • Chest X-ray is commonly used as a first line imaging method to diagnose the reason of respiratory distress in NICUs. • Lung ultrasound is a new diagnostic tool for lung imaging. What is New: • With the use of lung ultrasonography, radiation exposure of both newborns and healthcare workers can be reduced. • This retrospective study revealed that most of the babies with respiratory distress were treated without CXR.

Lung ultrasound is non-inferior to bronchoscopy for confirmation of double-lumen endotracheal tube positioning: a randomized controlled noninferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate placement of left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes (LDLTs) is paramount for optimal visualization of the operative field during thoracic surgeries that require single lung ventilation. Appropriate placement of LDLTs is therefore confirmed with fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) rather than clinical assessment alone. Recent studies have demonstrated lung ultrasound (US) is superior to clinical assessment alone for confirming placement of LDLT, but no large trials have compared US to the gold standard of FOB. This noninferiority trial was devised to compare lung US with FOB for LDLT positioning and achievement of lung collapse for operative exposure. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from October 2017 to July 2019. The study enrolled 200 ASA classification 1-3 patients that were scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring placement of LDLT. Study patients were randomized into either the FOB group or the lung US group after initial blind placement of LDLT. Five patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. In the FOB group (n = 98), fiberoptic bronchoscopy was used to confirm lung collapse due to proper positioning of the LDLT, and to adjust the tube if necessary. In the US group (n = 97), lung ultrasonography of four pre-specified zones (upper and lower posterior and mid-axillary) was used to assess lung collapse and guide adjustment of the tube if necessary. The primary outcome was presence of adequate lung collapse as determined by visual grading by the attending surgeon on scale from 1 to 4. Secondary outcomes included the time needed to adjust and confirm lung collapse, the time from finishing LDLT positioning to the grading of lung collapse, and intraoperative parameters such has hypotension or hypertension, hypoxia, and hypercarbia. The patient, attending anesthesiologist, and attending thoracic surgeon were all blinded to the intervention arm. RESULTS: The primary outcome of lung collapse by visual grading was similar between the intervention and the control groups, with 89 patients (91.8%) in the US group compared to 83 patients (84.1%) in the FOB group (p = 0.18) experiencing adequate collapse. This met criteria for noninferiority per protocol analysis. The median time needed to confirm and adjust LDLT position in the US group was 3 min (IQR 2-5), which was significantly shorter than the median time needed to perform the task in the FOB group (6 min, IQR 4-10) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring LDLT, lung ultrasonography was noninferior to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in achieving adequate lung collapse and reaches the desired outcome in less time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03314519 , Principal investigator: Kasana Raksamani, Date of registration: 19/10/2017.

The role of lung ultrasonography in the assessment of overhydration in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

PURPOSE: Existed methods like biochemical markers improve the accuracy of fluid evaluation for the maintenance hemodialysis patients, but none of them has become the gold standard. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of lung ultrasonography as a useful tool for monitoring the volume status of the patients. METHODS: A total of 88 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialytic were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients were divided into three groups: overhydration (OH), normohydration, and hypohydration according to bioimpedance spectroscopy. Lung ultrasonography parameters, echocardiography parameters, and clinical characteristics of three groups were analyzed. After an average follow-up of 433 days, all-cause mortality among groups was compared. RESULTS: The total number of lung comets was statistically reduced in patients after dialysis (Z= -6.891, p < 0.001). This reduction was related to ΔOH (OH - ΔW (the weight gain from dry weight)) and echocardiographic parameters, which proved the relationship among the comet-tail, hydration status of body and cardiac performance. The Kappa consistency test showed that lung ultrasonography and bioelectrical spectroscopy had moderate consistency. ROC analysis showed that the best cut-point of lung comet is 13. The pre-/post-dialysis lung comet-tail, cardiac function and total body impedance with all-cause mortality was investigated. Kaplan-Meier's analysis revealed that the all-cause mortality was higher in lung congestion patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a potentially reliable lung ultrasonography method for estimating fluids overload, which also has implication value of all-cause mortality.

Second-order grey-scale texture analysis of pleural ultrasound images to differentiate acute respiratory distress syndrome and cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Discriminating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) may be challenging in critically ill patients. Aim of this study was to investigate if gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis of lung ultrasound (LUS) images can differentiate ARDS from CPE. The study population consisted of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with acute respiratory failure and submitted to LUS and extravascular lung water monitoring, and of a healthy control group (HCG). A digital analysis of pleural line and subpleural space, based on the GLCM with second order statistical texture analysis, was tested. We prospectively evaluated 47 subjects: 16 with a clinical diagnosis of CPE, 8 of ARDS, and 23 healthy subjects. By comparing ARDS and CPE patients' subgroups with HCG, the one-way ANOVA models found a statistical significance in 9 out of 11 GLCM textural features. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons found statistical significance within each matrix feature for ARDS vs. CPE and CPE vs. HCG (P ≤ 0.001 for all). For ARDS vs. HCG a statistical significance occurred only in two matrix features (correlation: P = 0.005; homogeneity: P = 0.048). The quantitative method proposed has shown high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating normal lung from ARDS or CPE, and good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating CPE and ARDS. Gray-level co-occurrence matrix analysis of LUS images has the potential to aid pulmonary edemas differential diagnosis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency Protocol for the Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure.

Background: The multifactorial etiology of acute respiratory failure (ARF) often complicates diagnosis at an early stage of clinical presentation. Despite being a common life-threatening disorder, accurate and timely diagnosis is hindered by bad quality of bedside radiographs and nonavailability of immediate computed tomography imaging. This study was an attempt to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing ARF. Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study investigated the underlying etiological factor in 130 patients presenting with ARF and admitted to the intensive care unit. Lung ultrasound was performed according to the Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) protocol. The diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound by emergency protocol was measured against each final diagnosis. Results: The mean age observed was 49.28 ± 14.9 years among the cohort. Of the 130 patients, pneumonia was the most common cause of ARF, seen in 42 patients. Breathlessness (56.15%) and fever accompanied by cough (25.38%) were the chief complaints. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound lung emergency protocol was 95.38% in the diagnosis of pulmonary edema, 100% for pneumothorax, 93.85% for pneumonia, 96.92% for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 99.23% for pulmonary thromboembolism, and 95.38% for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is a reliable modality that provided accurate and timely diagnosis of ARF in this study. Therefore, BLUE protocol is feasible, easily implementable in the intensive care unit, and must be scaled up in respiratory health-care settings.

Emergence of Alveolar Consolidations in Serial Lung Ultrasound and Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been reported as a promising diagnostic tool for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but patients with previous lung parenchyma commitment have been not studied. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the emergence of sonographic consolidations, rather than their presence, can improve the VAP diagnosis in a sample including patients with previous lung parenchyma diseases. METHODS: Patients who completed 48 hours of mechanical ventilation were prospectively studied with daily LUS examinations. We checked the emergence of different consolidation types on the eve and on the day of a clinical suspicion of VAP. We elaborated an algorithm considering, sequentially, the emergence of (1) subpleural consolidations in anterior lung regions on the eve of suspicion; (2) lobar/sublobar consolidation in anterior lung regions on the day of suspicion; (3) lobar/sublobar consolidation with dynamic air bronchograms on the day of suspicion; and (4) any other lobar/sublobar consolidation on the day of suspicion in association with a positive Gram smear of endotracheal aspirate. RESULTS: Of the 188 included patients, 60 were suspected and 33 confirmed VAP. The presence of sonographic consolidations at the clinical suspicion had no diagnostic value for VAP. The emergence of subpleural consolidations in anterior lung regions on the eve of suspicion had specificity of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-99%). The emergence of lobar/sublobar consolidations in anterior lung regions on the day of suspicion had specificity of 100% (95% CI, 87%-100%). The emergence of lobar/sublobar consolidations with dynamic air bronchograms on the day of suspicion had specificity of 96% (95% CI, 81%-99%). Finally, the proposed algorithm had sensitivity of 63% (95% CI, 46%-77%) and specificity of 85% (95% CI, 67%-94%) for VAP. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of sonographic consolidations was not accurate for VAP when patients with previous lung parenchyma commitment were included. However, serial LUS examinations detected the emergence of specific signs of VAP.

Prediction of Pleural Adhesions by Lung Ultrasonography: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Pleural adhesion makes video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) an arduous procedure and can increase postoperative pain from accompanying adhesiolysis. For the present study, the feasibility of lung ultrasonography for the prediction of pleural adhesions and postoperative pain in VATS was investigated. DESIGN: Blinded, prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital, Seoul, South Korea. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III) scheduled to undergo VATS were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 53 patients were enrolled and followed-up. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated with lung ultrasonography during deep spontaneous respiration before induction of anesthesia, and surgeons confirmed the presence of pleural adhesions during the surgery. Pain was evaluated using a numeric rating scale and by the amount of opioid consumption until 24 hours postoperatively. Lung ultrasonography showed acceptable predictability of pleural adhesions, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.83) and high specificity (0.97, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) but low sensitivity (0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.68). The pain score was not different between sonographic adhesion (+) and (-) groups; however, the sonographic adhesion (+) group consumed more opioids until 24 hours postoperatively (fentanyl 675 [558-805] µg v 420 [356-476] µg; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasonography may help with planning postoperative pain management in VATS; however, it was a better tool for ruling out rather than detecting pleural adhesions.

The Use of POCUS to Manage ICU Patients With COVID-19.

Since the advent of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, clinicians have had to modify how they provide high-value care while mitigating the risk of viral spread. Routine imaging studies have been discouraged due to elevated transmission risk. Patients who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 often have a protracted hospital course with progression of disease. Given the need for close follow-up of patients, we recommend the use of ultrasonography, particularly point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), to manage patients with COVID-19 through their entire ICU course. POCUS will allow a clinician to evaluate and monitor cardiac and pulmonary function, as well as evaluate for thromboembolic disease, place an endotracheal tube, confirm central venous catheter placement, and rule out a pneumothorax. If a patient improves sufficiently to perform weaning trials, POCUS can also help evaluate readiness for ventilator liberation.

Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode.

BACKGROUND: During robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, aeration loss leads to perioperative atelectasis. Recently developed ventilator mode pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode could provide adequate ventilation with lower inspiratory pressure compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV); we hypothesized that PCV-VG mode may be beneficial in reducing perioperative atelectasis via low tidal volume (VT) of 6 mL/kg ventilation during robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position. We applied lung ultrasound score (LUS) for detecting perioperative atelectasis. We aimed to compare perioperative atelectasis between VCV and PCV-VG with a low VT of 6 mL/kg during pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position using LUS. METHODS: Patients scheduled for robotic gynecologic surgery were randomly allocated to the VCV (n = 41) or PCV-VG group (n = 41). LUS, ventilatory, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated at T1 (before induction), T2 (10 minutes after induction in the supine position), T3 (10 minutes after desufflation of CO2 in the supine position), and T4 (30 minutes after emergence from anesthesia in the recovery room). RESULTS: Eighty patients (40 with PCV-VG and 40 with VCV) were included. Demographic data showed no significant differences between the groups. The total LUS has changed from baseline to T4, 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32, 0.94) to 1.77 (95% CI, 1.42, 2.21) in the VCV group and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.16) to 1.43 (95% CI, 1.08, 1.78) in the PCV-VG group (P = 0.170). In both groups, total LUS increased significantly compared to the baseline values. CONCLUSION: Using a low VT of 6 mL/kg during pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, our study showed no evidence that PCV-VG ventilation was superior to VCV in terms of perioperative atelectasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006404.

Bedside ultrasound in the management of critically ill patients; Echocardiographic signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary embolism can be very similar, and lung ultrasound can act as a key: A case report.

Right-sided heart failure (RHF) diagnosed at point-of-care-ultrasonography examination of critical patients may reveal an acute disease, such as pulmonary embolism (PE), requiring emergency thrombolytic treatment. However, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and PE leading to acute RHF may exhibit very similar echocardiographic features. We report the case of a 27-year-old pregnant woman diagnosed with ARDS due to septic abortion, and in whom ARDS mimicked PE both clinically and on echocardiography. Such similarity may lead to inappropriate administration of thrombolytic therapy and/or delay the correct treatment. Lung ultrasonography may help avoiding this pitfall.

Application of lung ultrasonography in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Lung ultrasonography (LU) is useful to assess lung lesions and variations at bedside. To investigate the results of LU in severe and critical patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we performed a single-institution study to evaluate the related lung lesions and variations, and prophylactic strategies, in a large referral and treatment center. METHODS: We included 91 adult patients with severe and critical COVID-19, namely 62 males and 29 females, with an average age of 59 ± 11 years, who underwent LU. We collected the following patient information: sex, age, days in hospital, and days in ICU. In the ultrasound examinations, we recorded the presence of discrete B lines, confluent B lines, consolidation, pleural thickening, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax (PTX). RESULTS: Among the 91 severe and critical patients, 59 cases had scattered B lines, 56 cases had confluent B lines, 58 cases had alveolar-interstitial syndrome (AIS), 48 cases had lung consolidation, six cases had pleural thickening, 39 cases had pleural effusion (average depth of the pleural effusion: 1.0 ± 1.5 cm), and 20 patients developed PTX. In the Cox multivariate analysis, there were significant differences in age, hospitalization days, ICU days, and lung consolidation. CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasonography performed at the bedside can detect lung diseases, such as B lines, PTX, pulmonary edema, lung consolidation, pleural effusion, and variations of these findings. Our findings support the use of LU and measurements for estimating factors, and monitoring response to therapy in severe and critical COVID-19 patients.

Lung Ultrasonography and Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Pulmonary complications are common after cardiac surgery and are closely related to postoperative heart failure and adverse outcomes. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is currently a widely accepted diagnostic approach with well-established methodology, nomenclature, accuracy, and prognostic value in numerous clinical conditions. The advantages of LUS are universally recognized and include bedside applicability, high diagnostic sensitivity and reproducibility, no radiation exposure, and low cost. However, routine perioperative ultrasonography during cardiac surgery generally is limited to echocardiography, diagnosis of pleural effusion, and as a diagnostic tool for postoperative complications in different organs, and few studies have explored the clinical outcomes in relation to LUS among cardiac patients. This narrative review presents the clinical evidence regarding LUS application in intensive care and during the perioperative period for cardiac surgery. Furthermore, this review describes the methodology and the diagnostic and prognostic accuracies of LUS. A summary of ongoing clinical trials evaluating the clinical outcomes related to LUS also is provided. Finally, this review discusses the rationale for upcoming clinical research regarding whether routine use of LUS can modify current intensive care practice and potentially affect the clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Protective mechanical ventilation using low tidal volume has been introduced to surgical patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. We investigated the effects of protective ventilation (PV) techniques on anesthesia-induced atelectasis identified via lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: A total of 42 adult patients who were scheduled for open abdominal surgery with an expected duration > 2 hours were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive either conventional ventilation (CV; tidal volume of 9-10 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW] with no positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) or PV (tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg PBW and 5 cmH2O PEEP) via pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guaranteed. Lung ultrasonography was performed at four predefined time points to assess perioperative atelectasis by dividing each hemithorax into six quadrants based on a modified lung ultrasound (LUS) scoring system. RESULTS: The tidal volume delivered to patients was 9.65 ± 1.65 mL/kg PBW in the CV group and 6.31 ± 0.62 mL/kg PBW in the PV group. Ventilation using low tidal volume led to similar LUS scores in all lung areas and at all time points compared to ventilation using high tidal volume. There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of patients requiring recruitment maneuvers at the end of surgery. CONCLUSION: Ventilation with low tidal volume combined with 5 cmH2O PEEP did not cause further loss of aeration compared to ventilation with high tidal volume. Low tidal volume ventilation can be used in patients without lung injury based on lung assessment by bedside lung ultrasonography. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003746.