The role of surgery in gestational trophoblastic disease: an overview.

Gestational trophoblastic disease comprises a group of rare, and potentially malignant, conditions that arise from abnormal trophoblastic proliferation. When there is invasion and evidence of metastatic disease, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia is used. While chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, the role of surgery has come full circle in recent years. Before the introduction of highly effective systemic treatment options, surgery was the default treatment. Surgery for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia often yielded unsatisfactory results and mortality remained high. In recent years, the role of adjuvant surgery in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia has been examined with great interest. We aim to provide an overview of the various surgical approaches employed in managing gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, including their indications, techniques, and outcomes. Additionally, we discuss whether there is a role to do less in surgery for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and describe our experience with a modified surgical technique for its treatment. By summarizing the current evidence, this article highlights the significant contributions of surgery to the holistic management of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and provides a framework on which to base management and treatment programs.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: does centralization of care impact clinical management?

OBJECTIVE: International societies advocate for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia referral to designated expert centers. This study assessed the impact of centralization of trophoblastic care on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A centralized program was implemented in 2018 at two affiliated academic hospitals, Princess Margaret Cancer Center and Mount Sinai Hospital. A retrospective analysis of patients treated between 2000 and 2022 was performed and the clinical outcomes were compared before (2000-2017) and after (2018-2022) centralization. Statistical analyses were performed with significance set as p<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients with trophoblastic neoplasia were included: 60 pre-centralization and 34 post-centralization, 79.8% low-risk and 18.1% high-risk. Centralization led to significant improvement for: (1) accurate score documentation (from 37.9% to 89.3%,); (2) contraception counseling (from 67.2% to 96.7%); (3) median time from diagnosis to chemotherapy (from 9 days to 1 day); and (4) incomplete follow-up (from 20.7% to 3.3%) (all p<0.05). First-line chemotherapy for low-risk neoplasia was dactinomycin in 47.9% and 87.0% pre- and post-centralization, respectively (p=0.005). The median number of chemotherapy cycles decreased from seven to four (p=0.01), and the median number of consolidation cycles increased from two to three (p<0.001). Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels of 10 000-100 000 IU/L were significantly associated with longer time to hCG normalization and higher risk of resistance to first-line chemotherapy compared with hCG levels <1000 IU/L. CONCLUSION: Centralization of trophoblastic neoplasia care leads to greater guideline compliance, faster chemotherapy initiation, fewer chemotherapy cycles with optimized consolidation, and enhanced surveillance completion. This supports the establishment of trophoblastic neoplasia expert centers.

Directive clinique no 408 : Prise en charge des maladies gestationnelles trophoblastiques.

OBJECTIF: Cette directive passe en revue l'évaluation clinique et la prise en charge des maladies gestationnelles trophoblastiques, notamment les traitements chirurgicaux et médicamenteux des tumeurs bénignes, prémalignes et malignes. L'objectif de la présente directive clinique est d'aider les fournisseurs de soins de santé à rapidement diagnostiquer les maladies gestationnelles trophoblastiques, à normaliser les traitements et le suivi et à assurer des soins spécialisés précoces aux patientes dont l'atteinte est maligne ou métastatique. PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Gynécologues généralistes, obstétriciens, médecins de famille, sages-femmes, urgentologues, anesthésistes, radiologistes, anatomopathologistes, infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, résidents, gynécologues-oncologues, oncologues médicaux, radio-oncologues, chirurgiens, omnipraticiens en oncologie, infirmières en oncologie, pharmaciens, auxiliaires médicaux et autres professionnels de la santé qui traitent des patientes atteintes d'une maladie gestationnelle trophoblastique. La présente directive vise également à fournir des renseignements aux parties intéressées qui prodiguent des soins de suivi à ces patientes après le traitement. POPULATION CIBLE: Femmes en âge de procréer atteintes d'une maladie gestationnelle trophoblastique. OPTIONS: Les femmes ayant reçu un diagnostic de maladie gestationnelle trophoblastique doivent être orientées vers un gynécologue afin qu'il réalise une évaluation initiale, envisage une intervention chirurgicale primaire (évacuation ou hystérectomie) et effectue un suivi. Il y a lieu d'orienter les femmes ayant reçu un diagnostic de tumeur trophoblastique gestationnelle vers un gynécologue-oncologue afin qu'il effectue la stadification tumorale, établisse le score de risque et envisage l'intervention chirurgicale primaire ou un traitement systémique (mono- ou polychimiothérapie) et la nécessité d'éventuels traitements supplémentaires. Il est recommandé de discuter de chaque cas de néoplasie gestationnelle trophoblastique lors d'une réunion multidisciplinaire de cas oncologiques et de l'inscrire dans une base de données centralisée (régionale et/ou nationale). DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées au moyen des bases de données Embase et MEDLINE, du Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials et de la Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews afin de trouver les études publiées depuis 2002 utilisant un ou plusieurs des mots clés suivants : trophoblastic neoplasms, choriocarcinoma, trophoblastic tumor, placental site, gestational trophoblastic disease, hydatidiform mole, drug therapy, surgical therapy, radiotherapy, cure, complications, recurrence, survival, prognosis, pregnancy outcome, disease outcome, treatment outcome et remission. La recherche initiale a été effectuée en avril 2017; une mise à jour a été faite en mai 2019. Les données probantes pertinentes ont été sélectionnées aux fins d'inclusion selon l'ordre suivant : méta-analyses, revues systématiques, directives cliniques, essais cliniques randomisés, études de cohortes prospectives, études observationnelles, revues non systématiques, études de séries de cas et rapports. D'autres articles pertinents ont été trouvés en recoupant les revues répertoriées. Le nombre total d'études relevées était de 673, dont 79 études sont citées dans la présente revue. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Le contenu et les recommandations ont été rédigés et acceptés par les auteurs. La direction et le conseil d'administration de la Société de gynéco-oncologie du Canada ont passé en revue le contenu de la version préliminaire et ont soumis des commentaires à prendre en considération. Le conseil d'administration de la Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada a approuvé la version définitive aux fins de publication. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée au moyen des critères de l'approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Consulter les tableaux dans l'annexe en ligne pour connaître les critères de notation et d'interprétation des recommandations. BéNéFICES, RISQUES, COûTS: Les présentes recommandations aideront les médecins à diagnostiquer rapidement les maladies gestationnelles trophoblastiques et à orienter de façon urgente les patientes ayant reçu un diagnostic de maladie gestationnelle trophoblastique en gynécologie oncologique pour une prise en charge spécialisée. Le traitement des néoplasies gestationnelles trophoblastiques en centre spécialisé combiné à l'utilisation de bases de données centralisées permet de recueillir et de comparer des données sur les résultats thérapeutiques des patientes atteintes de ces tumeurs rares et d'optimiser les soins aux patientes. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES (CLASSEMENT GRADE ENTRE PARENTHèSES): RECOMMANDATIONS (CLASSEMENT GRADE ENTRE PARENTHèSES).

GestaTIonal TrophoblAstic NeoplasIa Ultrasound assessMent: TITANIUM study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on ultrasound morphologic features of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. A predictive model to determine predictors of response to therapy would be ideal in the management of patients with this rare disease. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES AND STUDY HYPOTHESIS: TITANIUM is a prospective, multicenter, observational study aiming to describe ultrasound features of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and to investigate the role of ultrasound in identifying patients at high risk of resistance to single-drug therapy. The study hypothesis is that ultrasound could improve the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) scoring system for early identification of patients predisposed to single-drug resistance. TRIAL DESIGN AND MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients eligible have a diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia according to FIGO or the criteria set by Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK. At diagnosis, patients are classified as low-risk (score 0-6) or high-risk (score >6) according to the FIGO risk scoring system, and a baseline ultrasound scan is performed. Patients receive treatment according to local protocol at each institution. Follow-up ultrasound examinations are performed at 1, 4, 10, 16, and 22 months after start of chemotherapy, and at each scan, serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level, and chemotherapy treatment, if any, are recorded. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: Our aims are to define ultrasound features of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and to develop a predictive model of resistance to single-drug therapy in low-risk patients. SAMPLE SIZE: The sample size was calculated assuming that 70% of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia are at low risk, and estimating the rate of resistance to single-drug therapy in this group to be 40%. Assuming a dropout rate of 10%, we should recruit at least 120 patients. With this sample size, we can attempt to create a mathematical model with three variables (either two ultrasound parameters in addition to the risk score or three ultrasound variables statistically significant at univariate analysis) to predict resistance to single-drug therapy in low-risk patients. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: The accrual started in February 2019. Additional referral centers for gestational trophoblastic disease, with similar ultrasound expertise, are welcome to participate in the study. Enrollment should be completed by December 2021, and analysis will be conducted in December 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study received the Ethical Committee approval of the Coordinator Center (Rome) in January 2019 (Protocol No. 0004668/19).

[Effects of prophylactic chemotherapy on outcomes and prognosis of patients older than 40 years with invasive mole].

Objective: To discuss the effects of prophylactic chemotherapy on the outcomes and prognosis of invasive mole patients. Methods: One hundred and fifteen invasive mole (IM) patients older than 40 years were registered in Peking Union Medical Collage Hospital.Eleven of them were treated with prophylactic chemotherapy before diagnosed as IM prophylactic chemotherapy group, while the other 104 cases received therapeutic chemotherapy after diagnosed as IM (non-prophylactic chemotherapy group). The general clinical data (including age, clinical stage, risk factor score), treatment, outcomes and relapse of patients were retrospectively compared between two groups. Results: (1) The age of prophylactic chemotherapy group and non-prophylactic chemotherapy group were (47±5) versus (46±4) years old. Ratio of clinical stageⅠ-Ⅱ were 3/11 versus 29.8% (31/104), clinical stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ were 8/11 versus 70.2% (73/104). Ratio of risk factor score 0-6 were 11/11 versus 84.6% (88/104), risk factor score >6 were 0 versus 15.4% (16/104). There were no significant statistical differences between two groups in age, clinical stage or risk factor score (all P>0.05). (2) Treatment: the total chemotherapy courses between prophylactic chemotherapy group and non-prophylactic chemotherapy group (median 7 versus 5) were significantly different (Z=3.071,P=0.002). There were no significant statistical differences between two groups in the chemotherapy courses until negative conversion of ß-hCG, consolidation chemotherapy courses, total therapeutic chemotherapy courses or ratio of hysterectomy (all P>0.05). (3) Outcomes and relapse: between the prophylactic chemotherapy group and the non-prophylactic chemotherapy group, the complete remission rate were 11/11 versus 98.1%(102/104), the relapse rate were 0 versus 1.0%(1/102). There were no significant difference between the two groups in outcomes or relapse rate (P>0.05). Conclusions: Prophylactic chemotherapy does not substantially benefit the IM patients older than 40 years. Prophylactic chemotherapy may not significantly improve patients' prognosis, in which increased sample size is required in further study.

Giant invasive mole presenting as a cause of abdominopelvic mass in a perimenopausal woman: An unusual presentation of a rare pathology.

Invasive mole is a benign gestational trophoblastic disease that arises from the myometrial invasion of any gestational event via direct extension through tissue or vascular structures. Invasive mole (and other gestational trophoblastic diseases) may present with life-threatening complications including uterine perforation, excessive bleeding, acute hemoperitoneum, and abdominal pain. We report a case of invasive mole presenting as abdominal distention in a 51-year-old perimenopausal woman (gravida 12, para 12, abortion 0). The patient was admitted to the gynecology clinic with a giant uterine mass filling the pelvic and abdominal cavity. To our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature of a gestational trophoblastic neoplasia presenting with uterine mass of 28 weeks' gestational size in this age group. Interestingly, complications such as uterine rupture or invasion of the adjacent structures (such as parametrial tissues or blood vessels) had not developed in our patient despite the considerable enlargement of the uterus.