Evaluating the protective capacity of soil heavy metals regulation limits on human health: A critical analysis concerning risk assessment - Importance of localization.

Heavy metal pollution of agricultural soil is a major global concern, prompting the establishment of maximum allowable limits (MALs) to ensure food safety and protect human health. This study collected and compared MALs for six heavy metals (As, Cd, Hg, Pb, Zn, and Cu) in agricultural soils from representative countries and organizations (EU and WHO/FAO). The research evaluated the critical health risks and efficacy of these MALs under the hypothetical scenario of metals concentrations reaching the maximum allowable level. Safe thresholds for heavy metals were then derived based on maximum acceptable health risk levels. The comparative analysis revealed significant variations in the specific limit values and terms of MALs across countries and organizations, even for the same metal. This suggests that there is no consensus among countries and organizations regarding the level of metal-related health risks. Furthermore, the risk analysis of metal concentrations reaching the maximum level accentuated heightened risks associated with As, suggesting that the current risk of soil As exposure was underestimated, particularly for children. However, soil Cu, Cd, and Zn limits generally resulted in low health risks, implying that the current limits may overestimate their hazard. Overall, the results highlight that the current MALs for soil heavy metals may not fully safeguard human health. There is a critical need to optimize current soil MALs based on localized risks and the actual impact of these metals on human health. It is suggested to appropriately lower the limits of metals (such as As) whose impact on health risks is underestimated, and cautiously increase the limits of metals (such as Cu, Cd, and Zn) that currently pose minor health risks. This approach aims to reduce both over and insufficient protection problems of soil heavy metal MALs, emphasizing the importance of considering the locality in setting these limits.

Heavy metals in marine fish meat and consumer health: a review.

The numerous health benefits provided by fish consumption may be compromised by the presence of toxic metals and metalloids such as lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury, which can have harmful effects on the human body if consumed in toxic quantities. The monitoring of metal concentrations in fish meat is therefore important to ensure compliance with food safety regulations and consequent consumer protection. The toxicity of these metals may be dependent on their chemical forms, which requires metal speciation processes for direct measurement of toxic metal species or the identification of prediction models in order to determine toxic metal forms from measured total metal concentrations. This review addresses various shortcomings in current knowledge and research on the accumulation of metal contaminants in commercially consumed marine fish globally and particularly in South Africa, affecting both the fishing industry as well as fish consumers.

Hemolysis indexes for biochemical tests and immunoassays on Roche analyzers: determination of allowable interference limits according to different calculation methods.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the hemolysis interference on biochemical tests and immunoassays performed on Roche Diagnostics analyzers, according to different maximum allowable limits. DESIGN AND METHODS: Heparinized plasma and serum pools, free of interferences, were overloaded by increasing amounts of a hemoglobin-titrated hemolysate. This interference was evaluated for 45 analytes using Modular(®) and Cobas(®) analyzers. For each parameter, the hemolysis index (HI) corresponding to the traditional ± 10% change of concentrations from baseline (± 10%Δ) was determined, as well as those corresponding to the analytical change limit (ACL), and to the reference change value (RCV). Then, the relative frequencies distribution (% RFD) of hemolyzed tests performed in a hospital laboratory over a 25-day period were established for each HI as allowable limit. RESULTS: Considering the ± 10%Δ, the analyte concentrations enhanced by hemolysis were: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), folate, potassium, creatine kinase, phosphorus, iron, alanine aminotransferase, lipase, magnesium and triglycerides, decreasingly. The analyte concentrations decreased by hemolysis were: Haptoglobin, high-sensitive troponin T and alkaline phosphatase. Over the 25-day period, the % RFD of tests impacted more than 10%Δ by hemolysis were < 7% for LDH; < 5% for AST, folates and iron; and < 1% for the other analytes. Considering the ACL, HI were lower, giving % RFD substantially increased for many analytes, whereas only four analytes remain sensitive to hemolysis when considering RCV. CONCLUSION: This study proposes new HI based on different allowable limits, and can therefore serve as a starting point for future harmonization of hemolysis interference evaluation needed in routine laboratory practice.