The Importance of International Normalized Ratio Monitoring in Patients With Mechanical Pulmonary Valve Prosthesis.

Background: The most challenging risk of mechanical valves is thromboembolic events; therefore, life-long anticoagulation therapy is necessary. Anticoagulation therapy should be adjusted for each patient with serial international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Due to the small number of patients with a mechanical valve in the pulmonary position, we are facing a lack of information about the therapeutic range of the INR in these patients. We aimed to evaluate patients with a history of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) who faced malfunction and compare their INR and echocardiographic data at the time of malfunction and 3 months prior. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 71 patients who had previously undergone PVR and presented to Shaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center with a diagnosis of pulmonary valve malfunction between 2014 and 2021 were included. Patients' INR and echocardiographic data at the time of the malfunction and 3 months before the malfunction diagnosis were gathered from the hospital's registry. IBM SPSS 20.0 was used for data analysis. Results: In this cross-sectional study, 71 patients with mechanical pulmonary valve malfunction were included. 49.3% (n = 35) were men, 50.7% (n=36) were women, and their mean age was 33.23 (±8.279). The mean INR of all patients 3 months before malfunction and at the time of malfunction was 2.29 (±0.753) and 2.20 (±0.704), respectively. Conclusion: In this study, most of our patients had an INR below the therapeutic range, both at the time of malfunction and 3 months prior. It emphasizes the importance of patient follow-up and keeping the INR in the therapeutic range.

A combination of severe complications in a case of infective endocarditis: Dehiscence of prosthetic aortic valve, aortic dissection, pseudoaneurysm, and hematoma causing right ventricular collapse.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis with mechanical complications causing pulmonary edema is fatal, therefore it needs to be diagnosed early and should be treated surgically in emergency setting. Transesophageal echocardiogram is crucial for recognizing the mechanical complications, which can be encountered on daily practice, but the coexistence of complications occurring on different mechanism is rather uncommon. Herein, we report a 21-year-old gentleman presenting with acute heart failure, whose imaging tests showed a combination of dehiscence of mechanical aortic valve prosthesis, aortic dissection, pseudoaneurysm, and hematoma causing right ventricular collapse.

Surgical aortic valve replacement in the modern era: Insights from the French Registry EPICARD.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the demographic changes and postoperative outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in recent years since the advent of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in France. METHODS: Demographic, surgical data, and early outcomes of patients undergoing SAVR for AS were reviewed from The French registry EPICARD before (2007-2012) and after (2013-2018) approval of TAVI by French health authorities. We included patients with less than 20% of missing data per variable and per patient. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to assess for risk factors of mortality and acute kidney failure (AKF) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). RESULTS: A total of 27,398 patients from the EPICARD registry were included: 8819, in the early cohort (2007-2012) and 18,579 in the recent cohort (2013-2018). In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were lower in the recent cohort compared to the early cohort, respectively 1.22% versus 2.20 (p < .001) and 1.22% versus 2.34% (p < .001). The bioprosthesis-to-mechanical prosthesis ratio significantly increased over the time: from 5.3 to 8.1. In the recent cohort, rates of postoperative blood transfusions, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and AKF requiring RRT were lower. In-hospital and 30-day mortality risks were decreased in the recent cohort, with odds ratio respectively of 0.668 [0.466-0.958] and 0.66 [0.460-0.945] in multivariate (p ≤ .005) and univariate analysis (p < .001). Risk of AKF with RRT was unchanged. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study from the French registry EPICARD shows significant reduced hospital mortality and persistent favourable early outcomes of SAVR since TAVI implementation.

Clinical Outcome of Reoperation for Mechanical Prosthesis at Aortic Position.

AIM: Redo aortic valve surgery is usually associated with a high risk of mortality and complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of reoperation after prior mechanical prosthesis implantation at the aortic position. METHOD: The clinical data of 146 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation at the aortic position between 2003 and 2019 were analysed. RESULTS: Mean age was 51.5±12.7 years and 69 (47.3%) were female. The median interval from prior surgery to redo aortic valve surgery was 6 years. The aetiologies were pannus formation with prosthetic aortic stenosis in 62 cases (42.5%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in five (3.4%), PVE with perivalvular leakage (PVL) in 16 (11.0%), PVL in 45 (30.8%), thrombosis in seven (4.8%), and aortic disease in 11 (7.5%). As for surgical procedure, aortic valve replacement was performed in 81 cases (55.5%), Bentall in 34 (23.3%), PVL repair in six (4.1%), and pannus debridement in 25 (17.1%). Fourteen (14) (9.6%) patients expired perioperatively. Prolonged ventilation time and postoperative renal failure were proved to be significant independent predictors of mortality according to multivariate analysis. Overall survival was 87.8%±7.4% and 76.4%±15.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Survival was 87.7%±13.7% and 84.2%±15.6% in the pannus group, and 84.5%±12.6% and 74.6%±19.4% in the non-pannus group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.951). Survival was 87.5%±14.2% and 75.8%±22.7% in the PVL group and 84.7%±11.9% and 81.6%±13.5% in the non-PVL group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.365). CONCLUSIONS: Pannus formation and PVL are two major indications for reoperation of mechanical prosthesis at the aortic position. Redo aortic valve surgery has a satisfactory outcome but with a high risk of complications. Long-term survival of patients seems not to be related to the aetiology. Final decision-making of redo aortic valve surgery should be based on aetiology.

[Redo tricuspid valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis for repeated early bioprosthetic valve failure]. / Reprotezirovanie trikuspidal'nogo klapana mekhanicheskim protezom u patsientki s povtornoi rannei disfunktsiei bioproteza.

Tricuspid leaflet lesion following infective endocarditis is a severe condition requiring surgical treatment in most cases. Currently, tricuspid valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis is still essential in the treatment of patients ineligible for reconstructive surgery or bioprosthesis implantation. The authors describe redo tricuspid valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis for repeated early bioprosthetic valve failure.

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of heart valve replacement with a mechanical versus biological prosthesis in patients with heart valvular disease.

Heart valve disease (HVD) affects 2.5% of the US population and one million individuals aged 65 years and older in the UK. Given its burden, the aim of the present review was to assess the cost-effectiveness of heart valve replacement with mechanical versus biological prosthesis in HVD patients. We performed a systematic search in various electronic databases from January 1990 to June 2019. Five out of 542 articles were entered into the study, from which 2 papers were subsequently excluded not meeting the minimum number of items of the CHEERS checklist. Quality-Adjusted Life Year, Life Years Gained, and the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) regarding the type of replaced heart valve were extracted and reported. Studies were conducted in three different countries (Iran, France, and USA). ICER ranged from $1253 in Iran to €54,634 in France. Survival rate of mitral mechanical versus biological valves at 10 and 20 years was 72.9% versus 76.0% and 51% versus 30%, respectively. Survival rate at 20 years in patients undergoing atrial valve replacement was 20%. Ten- and 20-year death rates for biological valves were higher with respect to mechanical prosthesis (15.5% versus 8.4% at 10 years), with this difference becoming more relevant at 20 years (36.9% versus 13.9%). Due to higher ICER, mortality rate, and lower success rates in the long term for biological prostheses compared to mechanical ones, these appear to be more suitable for older patients (aged ≥ 70 years).

Assessment of normal hemodynamic profile of mechanical pulmonary prosthesis by doppler echocardiography: a prospective cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Very few reports have described the Doppler-derived echocardiographic parameters for mechanical pulmonary valve prosthesis (MPVP). This study aims to describe the normal Doppler hemodynamic profile of MPVP using Doppler echocardiography. METHODS: The current prospective, single center observational study enrolled 108 patients who underwent pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) surgery for the first time and had a normally functioning prosthesis post-operation. The hemodynamic performance of MPVPs, considering flow dependent and flow independent parameters, was evaluated at two follow-up points, at week one and week four post-operation. All assessments were conducted by an experienced echocardiographer. RESULTS: The mean age (±SD) of the participants was 26.4 (±8.98). Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) was the most common underlying disease leading to PVR, with a prevalence of 88%. At first week post-operation, measurement of indices reported the following values (±SD): peak pressure gradient (PPG): 18.51(±7.64) mm Hg; mean pressure gradient (MPG): 10.88(±5.62) mm Hg; peak velocity (PV): 1.97(±0.43)m/s; doppler velocity index (DVI): 0.61(±18); pulmonary velocity acceleration time (PVAT): 87.35(±15.16) ms; effective orifice area (EOA): 2.98(±1.02) cm2;and effective orifice area to body surface area ratio (EOA/ BSA): 1.81(±0.62) cm2/m2. Comparing these measurements with those obtained from the second follow-up (at week four post-op) failed to hold significant difference in all values except for PVAT, which had increased from its primary value (p = 0.038). Also, right ventricular (RV) function showed significant improvement throughout the follow up period. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study help strengthen the previously scarce data pool and better establish the normal values for Doppler hemodynamics in mechanical pulmonary prosthesis.

[Bentall-DeBono procedure with xenopericardial valved conduit: a 24-year follow-up data]. / Operatsiya Bentalla­De Bono s primeneniem ksenoperikardial'nogo konduita: rezul'taty 24-letnego nablyudeniya.

Long-term outcome of surgical treatment of a patient with severe aortic insufficiency and ascending aortic aneurysm is reported. The patient underwent Bentall-DeBono procedure with xenopericardial valved conduit. This technique is associated with no complications specific for Dacron conduits and ensures clinical compensation of heart failure, improves prognosis and quality of life.

Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis in a Patient Receiving Rivaroxaban.

Direct oral anticoagulants are not approved for use in patients with mechanical valves. When used to replace vitamin K antagonists, they may cause catastrophic consequences. The authors describe the case of a patient who, after discontinuation of warfarin and introduction of rivaroxaban, developed thrombosis of his mechanical mitral prosthesis.

[Surgical treatment of aortic valve stenosis]. / Chirurgische Therapie der Aortenklappenstenose.

Surgical aortic valve replacement still represents the gold standard in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. In addition to conventional aortic valve replacement by mechanical or biological prostheses via a median sternotomy, novel approaches including minimally invasive strategies and new devices, such as so-called rapid deployment prostheses, are becoming increasingly more established. Autologous replacement strategies including the Ross and the Ozaki procedures have evolved into reliable options at selected centers of excellence. These novel treatment approaches in aortic valve surgery result in excellent short and long-term outcomes with a reduction of procedure-related complications. Taken together, these modern surgical replacement strategies enable a personalized surgical treatment in patients with aortic valve stenosis, which are tailored to the individual patient.

The optimal management of anti-thrombotic therapy after valve replacement: certainties and uncertainties.

Anti-thrombotic therapy after valve replacement encompasses a number of different situations. Long-term anticoagulation of mechanical prostheses uses vitamin K antagonists with a target international normalized ratio adapted to the characteristics of the prosthesis and the patient. The association of low-dose aspirin is systematic in the American guidelines and more restrictive in the European guidelines. Early heparin therapy is frequently used early after mechanical valve replacement, although there are no precise recommendations regarding timing, type, and dose of drug. Direct oral anticoagulants are presently contraindicated in patients with mechanical prosthesis. The main advantage of bioprostheses is the absence of long-term anticoagulant therapy. Early anticoagulation is indicated after valve replacement for mitral bioprostheses, whereas aspirin is now favoured early after bioprosthetic valve replacement in the aortic position. Early dual antiplatelet therapy is indicated after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. However, this relies on low levels of evidence and optimization of anti-thrombotic therapy is warranted in these high-risk patients. Although guidelines are consistent in most instances, discrepancies and the low-level of evidence of certain recommendations highlight the need for further controlled trials, in particular with regard to the combination of antiplatelet therapy with oral anticoagulant and the early post-operative anti-thrombotic therapy following the procedure.

Long term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses in the tricuspid valve position: which valve types are better--mechanical or biological prostheses?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients who underwent TVR focusing on long-term survival- and valve-related complications. METHODS: Between January 1993 and June 2011, 132 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement in our centre. Sixty-eight bioprosthetic valves (52%) and 64 mechanical valves (48%) were implanted for tricuspid position. For 51 patients (39%) this was a first-time tricuspid valve operation. RESULTS: Nineteen patients died during hospitalisation, yielding a hospital mortality rate of 14%. The hospital mortality and morbidity were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Sixteen patients (14,1%) died after discharge from the hospital. Twelve-year actuarial survival after mechanical and bioprosthetic TVR was 72,1±5,9 and 61.6±6,6%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in regard to event-free survival. CONCLUSION: The choice between mechanical or biological prostheses in the tricuspid position should be individualised according to the clinical judgment, even though absence of any difference in the survival data supports the opinion that there is no "gold standard" for prosthetic tricuspid valve replacement.

Decellularized aortic homografts versus mechanical composite grafts for aortic root replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical composite valve grafts (MCVGs) are the first-line therapy for aortic root replacement in young adults. Decellularized aortic homografts (DAH) present a promising novel alternative due to their lower thrombogenicity. We aimed to compare both treatment options regarding survival and valve-related adverse events. METHODS: This study was designed as a single-centre retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent root replacement with MCVG or DAH between 2000 and 2022. Urgent or emergent procedures were excluded. RESULTS: The study cohort included 289 patients (MCVG n = 216, DAH n = 73) with a mean age of 48.5 ± 12 years (MCVG 49 ± 12 years vs DAH 47 ± 11 years; P = 0.23) and a median EuroScore II of 1.7% (1.2, 2.6). The 30-day mortality was 1% (n = 3). Cumulative survival at 3 years was 99% for DAH and 94% for MCVG, respectively (P = 0.15). Mean follow-up was 98.9 ± 72.7 months. Bleeding events (n = 14, 6.5%) and thromboembolism (n = 14, 6.5%) were only observed in the MCVG group (P = 0.19 and 0.09, respectively). Four cases (5%) of moderate structural valve deterioration occurred, all in the DAH group (P ≤ 0.001). The cumulative incidence of a composite end point of valve-related adverse events was significantly higher in the MCVG group (P = 0.0295). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement with MCVGs and decellularized aortic homografts showed low mortality in an elective setting. Patients in the homograft cohort demonstrated significantly higher freedom from valve-related adverse events. DAH present a promising treatment option for young patients requiring root replacement; however, data on long-term durability are needed.

Adapting to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve: a phenomenographic study.

AIM: To describe how patients adapt to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve. BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis is preferred for patients with life expectancy of more than 10 years as they are more durable than bioprosthetic valves. Mechanical valves have some disadvantages, such as higher risk of thrombosis and embolism, increased risk of bleeding related to lifelong oral anticoagulation treatment and noise from the valve. DESIGN: An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was employed. METHODS: An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was applied. Interviews were conducted over 4 months during 2010-2011 with 20 strategically sampled patients, aged 24-74 years having undergone aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis during the last 10 years. FINDINGS: Patients adapted to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve in four ways: 'The competent patient' wanted to stay in control of his/her life. 'The adjusted patient' considered the implications of having a mechanical aortic valve as part of his/her daily life. 'The unaware patient' was not aware of warfarin-diet-medication interactions. 'The worried patient' was bothered with the oral anticoagulation and annoyed by the sound of the valve. Patients moved between the different ways of adapting. CONCLUSIONS: The oral anticoagulation therapy was considered the most troublesome consequence, but also the sound of the valve was difficult to accept. Patient counselling and adequate follow-up can make patients with mechanical aortic heart valves more confident and competent to manage their own health. We recommend that patients should participate in a rehabilitation programme following cardiac surgery.

Mechanical valve thrombosis: Current management and differences between guidelines.

All foreign bodies inserted in the circulatory system are thrombogenic and require temporary or lifelong antithrombotic therapies to prevent thrombosis. The adequate level of anticoagulation during the first few months determines the long-term durability, particularly for mechanical prostheses, and also for biological valves. Suboptimal anticoagulation is the most frequent source of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT). The patient's clinical presentation decides how mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction is managed. If the mechanical valve thrombosis is obstructive and the patient is in a critical condition with hemodynamic instability, an immediate surgical intervention should be performed.  The thrombolytic treatment is an option for left mechanical valve thrombosis in patients who have high surgical risk and no contraindications and also for right heart valve thrombosis. In non-obstructive thrombosis on the mechanical valve, patients can be asymptomatic, requiring optimization of the anticoagulant treatment. Both obstructive and non-obstructive thrombus formed on the mechanical prosthesis can result in embolic events. If the thrombus persists following anticoagulant treatment, the recommended options include thrombolytic treatment or redo surgery. Pannus can also cause obstruction of the prosthesis for which surgical treatment is the only option. While these clinical scenarios may initially appear to have straightforward solutions in terms of surgery, thrombolysis, or effective anticoagulation, real-world clinical experience often proves more complex. For instance, a patient with some usual comorbidities and non-obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, experiencing symptoms solely by repeated systemic embolizations, might undergo all three therapeutic options due to the unpredictable nature of MVT. Therefore, treatment indications can intersect both on the time axis and depending on the patient's clinical status and the expertise of the center where he is hospitalized. Moreover, the European and American guidelines show subtle but important differences. The aim of this review was to compare these differences, comment on recent studies and evidence gaps, propose a more pragmatic algorithm combining all current recommendations, and highlight important research directions for this disease that has dominated the cardiovascular landscape for more than five decades, but for which there have been no significant recent changes in management.

Evolving technology: the TRIFLO tri-leaflet mechanical valve without oral anticoagulation: a potential major innovation in valve surgery.

The aortic valve is the most frequently diseased valve and aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in developed countries. The diseased native aortic valve can be replaced by either a biological or mechanical valve prosthesis. The main concerns relate to durability, the need for oral anticoagulants and the incidence of complications related to this medication. Experimental, computational and biomolecular blood flow studies have demonstrated that the systolic forward flow but also the reverse flow phase at the end of the systole and leakage during the diastolic phase is mainly responsible for platelet activation and thrombosis. Better design of mechanical prosthetic heart valves must ensure smooth closing during flow deceleration and must eliminate high-shear hinge flow during diastole to prevent life-threatening thrombosis. A novel tri-leaflet valve should combine the favorable hemodynamics and the durability of existing mechanical heart valves and eliminate the less favorable characteristics, including the extremely rapid closing. In this paper, we discuss some issues of current mechanical heart valve prostheses and present a new valve design with the potential for significant innovation in the field. The TRIFLO Heart Valve, is a rigid, three-leaflet central flow heart valve prosthesis consisting of an alloyed titanium housing, and three rigid polymer (PEEK) cusps. This valve has a physiological operating mode. During the forward flow phase, the intraventricular pressure opens the leaflets so that blood can freely flow through with little obstruction, and with the deceleration of the blood flow, the leaflets close early and smoothly, minimizing blood flow regurgitation, blood cell damage, and activation of the coagulation cascade. Pre-clinical studies have shown pretty favorable results and a first-in-man study should start very soon.

Trends in SAVR with biological vs. mechanical valves in middle-aged patients: results from a French large multi-centric survey.

Background/introduction: Currently, despite continued issues with durability ( 1), biological prosthetic valves are increasingly chosen over mechanical valves for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in adult patients of all ages, at least in Western countries. For younger patients, this choice means assuming the risks associated with a redo SAVR or valve-in-valve procedure. Purpose: To assess the use of mechanical vs. biological valve prostheses for SAVR relative to patient's age and implant time in a large population extracted from the French National Database EPICARD. Methods: Patients in EPICARD undergoing SAVR from 2007 to 2022 were included from 22 participating public or private centers chosen to represent a balanced representation of centre sizes and geographical discrepancies. Patients with associated pathology of the aorta (aneurysm or dissection) and requiring a vascular aortic prosthesis were excluded. Comparisons were made amongst centers, valve choice, implant date range, and patient age. Results: We considered 101,070 valvular heart disease patients and included 72,375 SAVR (mean age 71.4 ± 12.2 years). We observed a mechanical vs. biological prosthesis ratio (MBPR) of 0.14 for the overall population. Before 50 years old (y-o), MBPR was >1.3 (p < 0.001) while patients above 60 years-old received principally biological SAVR (p < 0.0001). Concerning patients between 50 and 60 years-old patients, MPVR was 1.04 (p = 0.03). Patients 50-60 years-old from the first and second study duration quartile (before August 2015) received preferentially mechanical SAVR (p < 0.001). We observed a shift towards more biological SAVR (p < 0.001) for patients from the third and fourth quartile to reach a MBPR at 0.43 during the last years of the series. Incidentally, simultaneous mitral valve replacement were more common in case of mechanical SAVR (p < 0.0001), while associated CABGs were more frequent in case of biological SAVR (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In a large contemporary French patient population, real world practice showed a recent shift towards a lower age-threshold for biological SAVR as compared to what would suggest contemporary guidelines.

Multiparametric Approach for the Assessment of Mechanical Prosthetic Tricuspid Leaflet Function.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of comprehensive echocardiographic data to allow discrimination of normal versus abnormal mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valve (MPTV) leaflet function. The identification of such parameters is essential to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic measures. METHODS: The authors investigated bileaflet MPTV function by comparing transthoracic echocardiographic data from 21 episodes of leaflet dysfunction due to valve thrombosis in 12 patients with data from 56 individuals with normal MPTV function. All episodes of dysfunction were confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography and/or cine fluoroscopy. Transthoracic echocardiography-derived two-dimensional, color, and spectral Doppler variables, including MPTV peak early diastolic velocity (E velocity), mean gradient, pressure half-time, time-velocity integral (TVI) of the MPTV, ratio of TVIMPTV to TVI of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and TVI of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and continuity-derived effective orifice area, were measured in both groups. RESULTS: Most episodes of MPTV dysfunction resulted from simultaneous involvement of both leaflets (57%), with leaflet(s) often immobilized in the open or semiopen position (71%). Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography performed similarly in detecting abnormal leaflet motion (90% vs 88%, P = .68), whereas transesophageal echocardiography was better in identifying MPTV thrombosis (31% vs 14%, respectively, P = .01). Color Doppler demonstrated flow propagation abnormalities in 67% of episodes of leaflet dysfunction but not in the control group (P < .0001). Doppler variables associated with MPTV leaflet dysfunction included E velocity > 1.6 m/sec, mean gradient > 5 mm Hg, PHT > 157 msec, TVIMPTV > 42 cm, TVIMPTV/TVILVOT > 2.3, TVIMPTV/TVIRVOT > 3.0, and continuity-derived effective orifice area ≤ 1.1 cm2, with most variables showing high and similar accuracy (area under the curve ≥ 95%). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of MPTV leaflet dysfunction that provides parameters and criteria to distinguish normal versus abnormal prosthetic valve function.

Active infective endocarditis of both aortic and pulmonic valves in association with ventricular septal defect treated with double valve replacement and closure of the defect.

Described herein is a 29-year-old man with a ventricular septal defect who developed active infective endocarditis on both his pulmonic and aortic valves. We found only six previously reported cases partially similar to ours.

Mechanical or biological heart valve for dialysis-dependent patients? A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal selection of prosthetic heart valve for dialysis-dependent patients remains controversial. We investigated the comparative effectiveness and safety of mechanical prosthesis (MP) and bioprosthesis (BP) for these patients. METHODS: After the systematic review, we included studies that involved patients on dialysis undergoing aortic valve replacement or mitral valve replacement (MVR) and reported comparative outcomes of MP and BP. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. We conducted a subgroup analysis based on the valve position and postoperative international normalized ratio (INR), which was extracted from either tables or methods of each study. A meta-regression was used to examine the effects of study-level covariates. RESULTS: We included 24 retrospective studies without randomized-controlled trials, involving 10,164 participants (MP = 6934, BP = 3230). Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with MP exhibited a better long-term survival effectiveness (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.86). Conversely, studies including MVR demonstrated little difference in survival (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.12). A meta-regression revealed that age had little effect on long-term survival difference between MP and BP (ß = -0.0135, P = .433). MP had a significantly greater bleeding risk than did BP when INR was above 2.5 (incidence rate ratio, 10.58; 95% CI, 2.02-55.41). However, when INR was below 2.5, bleeding events were comparable (incidence rate ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.78-3.82). The structural valve deterioration rate was significantly lower in MP (risk ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44). CONCLUSIONS: MP is a reasonable choice for dialysis-dependent patients without additional thromboembolic risk requiring aortic valve replacement, for its better long-term survival, durability, and noninferior bleeding risk compared with BP. Conversely, BP might be an appropriate selection for patients with MVR, given its similar survival rate and lower bleeding risk. Although our meta-regression demonstrates little influence of age on long-term survival difference between MP and BP, further studies stratifying patients based on age cut-off are mandatory.