RESUMO
Background: Pediatric residents frequently manage critically ill neonates but have limited systematic training in mechanical ventilation (MV). Competing demands, varying learner levels, and topic complexity contribute to inconsistent education. A blended learning approach may be ideally suited to achieve meaningful learning but has not been described for this topic and learner. Objective: To design, implement, and evaluate a flipped classroom for pediatric residents in neonatal MV. Methods: We used Kern's six-step framework for curricular development to create a flipped classroom curriculum in neonatal MV. Individual prework included interaction with six prerecorded animated whiteboard videos, while in-person learning occurred in small groups at the bedside of a ventilated infant. A mixed-methods evaluation included surveys, quantitative knowledge test scores (before, immediately after, and six months after course completion), and qualitative analysis of participant focus groups. Results: Twenty-six learners participated in the curriculum. Mean knowledge test scores rose and were sustained after course completion (51% baseline, 82% immediate posttest, 90% retention; P < 0.001). Learners identified various design elements, technology affordances, and instructor factors as meaningful, and they identified unexpected impacts of the curriculum beyond knowledge acquisition, including effects on professional identities, interdisciplinary communication skills, and contribution to the culture of safety. Conclusion: This curriculum aligned with resident roles, was meaningful to learners, and led to long-term increases in knowledge scores and access to quality education; flipped classroom design using meaningful learning theory and leveraging animated whiteboard technology may be a useful strategy for other highly complex topics in graduate medical education.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently, the demand for mechanical ventilation (MV) has increased with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the conventional approaches to MV training are resource intensive and require on-site training. Consequently, the need for independent learning platforms with remote assistance in institutions without resources has surged. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an augmented reality (AR)-based self-learning platform for novices to set up a ventilator without on-site assistance. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled pilot study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center, Korea, from January to February 2022. Nurses with no prior experience of MV or AR were enrolled. We randomized the participants into 2 groups: manual and AR groups. Participants in the manual group used a printed manual and made a phone call for assistance, whereas participants in the AR group were guided by AR-based instructions and requested assistance with the head-mounted display. We compared the overall score of the procedure, required level of assistance, and user experience between the groups. RESULTS: In total, 30 participants completed the entire procedure with or without remote assistance. Fewer participants requested assistance in the AR group compared to the manual group (7/15, 47.7% vs 14/15, 93.3%; P=.02). The number of steps that required assistance was also lower in the AR group compared to the manual group (n=13 vs n=33; P=.004). The AR group had a higher rating in predeveloped questions for confidence (median 3, IQR 2.50-4.00 vs median 2, IQR 2.00-3.00; P=.01), suitability of method (median 4, IQR 4.00-5.00 vs median 3, IQR 3.00-3.50; P=.01), and whether they intended to recommend AR systems to others (median 4, IQR 3.00-5.00 vs median 3, IQR 2.00-3.00; P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: AR-based instructions to set up a mechanical ventilator were feasible for novices who had no prior experience with MV or AR. Additionally, participants in the AR group required less assistance compared with those in the manual group, resulting in higher confidence after training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05446896; https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05446896.