Adjuvant tamoxifen adherence in men with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Most breast cancers (BCs) in men are hormone receptor-positive. Adjuvant tamoxifen is part of the standard treatment of these patients. Small, single-institution studies have suggested that men have high rates of discontinuing adjuvant endocrine treatment. The authors examined rates of tamoxifen discontinuation and medication adherence in a large population-based cohort of male patients with BC. METHODS: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, male patients with invasive nonmetastatic BC, diagnosed between 2007 and 2013, who were ≥65 years old, had Part D coverage, and had tamoxifen prescriptions within 1 year of diagnosis were identified. Adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio of ≥80% among those patients who were filling tamoxifen prescriptions. Logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of tamoxifen adherence. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients met eligibility criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 75 years. The median follow-up was 32.5 months. The rates of tamoxifen discontinuation were 15.8%, 24.3%, 31.3%, 36.9%, and 48.3% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after diagnosis, respectively. Among the men who were still taking tamoxifen, the corresponding adherence rates were 76.9%, 73.6%, 68.7%, 64.8%, and 60.2%. In the adjusted model, significant predictors of lower adherence included residing in a high poverty area (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.12) and a Charlson comorbidity score of ≥2 (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.97). CONCLUSION: Older men with breast cancer have high rates of tamoxifen discontinuation, with 48% of all patients discontinuing tamoxifen before the end of year 5. Additionally, even among those patients continuing tamoxifen, a substantial number of patients are nonadherent. Further research should evaluate potentially modifiable reasons for treatment discontinuation and lack of adherence to tamoxifen.

Predialysis Cardiovascular Disease Medication Adherence and Mortality After Transition to Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes in the general population. However, little is known about the association of predialysis medication adherence among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and mortality following their transition to dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 32,348 US veterans who transitioned to dialysis during 2007 to 2011. PREDICTORS: Adherence to treatment with cardiovascular drugs, ascertained from pharmacy database records using proportion of days covered (PDC) and persistence during the predialysis year. OUTCOMES: Post-dialysis therapy initiation all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, using Cox models with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: Mean age of the cohort was 72±11 (SD) years; 96% were men, 74% were white, 23% were African American, and 69% had diabetes. During a median follow-up of 23 (IQR, 9-36) months, 18,608 patients died. Among patients with PDC>80%, there were 14,006 deaths (mortality rate, 283 [95% CI, 278-288]/1,000 patient-years]); among patients with PDC>60% to 80%, there were 3,882 deaths (mortality rate, 294 [95% CI, 285-304]/1,000 patient-years); among patients with PDC≤60%, there were 720 deaths (mortality rate, 291 [95% CI, 271-313]/1,000 patient-years). Compared with patients with PDC>80%, the adjusted HR for post-dialysis therapy initiation all-cause mortality for patients with PDC>60% to 80% was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.08-1.16), and for patients with PDC≤60% was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.11-1.30). In addition, compared with patients showing medication persistence, adjusted HR risk for post-dialysis therapy initiation all-cause mortality for patients with nonpersistence was 1.11 (95% CI, 1.05-1.16). A similar trend was detected for cardiovascular mortality and in subgroup analyses. LIMITATIONS: Large number of missing values; results may not be generalizable to women or the general US population. CONCLUSIONS: Predialysis cardiovascular medication nonadherence is an independent risk factor for postdialysis mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease transitioning to dialysis therapy. Further studies are needed to assess whether interventions targeting adherence improve survival after dialysis therapy initiation.

Clozapine use reduced psychiatric hospitalization and emergency room visits in patients with bipolar disorder independent of improved treatment regularity in a three-year follow-up period.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of clozapine in bipolar disorder remains to be systemically examined. In the current study, we sought to disentangle the effect of clozapine from that of improved treatment regularity and to compare the effect of clozapine with the effect of regular treatment for bipolar disorder by exploring the complete 10-year clozapine prescription data from a Taiwanese total population health claims database. METHODS: In the period between 2000 and 2009, 3,874 (3.3%) out of the 117,785 patients identified as having bipolar disorder in a Taiwanese total population health claims database were ever prescribed clozapine. Among them, 920 patients with bipolar disorder who had good pre-clozapine medication compliance and received at least two clozapine prescriptions were further categorized according to their clozapine medication possession ratio (MPR) as regular users (MPR ≥ 0.8; n = 476) and irregular users (MPR < 0.8; n = 444). Using a mirror-image design, we compared the numbers of emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations and hospital days, and the average durations of a single hospitalization during the pre- and post-clozapine mirror periods with a follow-up time of up to three years, controlling for time-variant course confounders. RESULTS: The patterns of change in outcome indices from the pre-clozapine period to the post-clozapine period differed significantly between the two clozapine-user groups. Clinical outcome indices improved only in regular users, while they deteriorated in irregular users. Over the three-year follow-up period, the irregular users consistently had a higher adjusted risk for increased numbers of ER visits [odds ratio (OR): 2.06-2.43], hospitalizations (OR: 2.52-3.22), and total hospital days (OR: 2.42-2.91) when compared to the regular users. Thus, effects of clozapine were consistently demonstrated in one- to three-year mirror comparison periods. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine, when used with high treatment regularity (MPR > 0.8), was effective in reducing the numbers of ER visits, hospitalizations, and total hospital days in patients with bipolar disorder with previous frequent hospitalizations and ER visits despite regular pre-clozapine treatment for bipolar disorder. However, high early attrition and suboptimal treatment compliance need to be rectified in order to optimize the outcome of clozapine treatment in bipolar disorders.

Adherence to inhaled therapies over 4 years in people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the drug-specific and overall adherence of teenagers and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) to inhaled therapies, to assess the degree of adherence, stability over a period of 4 years, and its association with health outcomes. METHODS: Fifty-five participants (30 women and 25 men) aged 14 years or older from two CF centers were enrolled in a retrospective review of inhaled medication adherence over 4 years. Adherence was assessed by the number of doses that were obtained by each participant based on the "e-prescription.gr" platform and the calculation of the medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: The mean composite MPR (cMPR) for the entire research period was 0.75 ± 0.19. A total of 43.4% of participants showed a variance of adherence <25%. Participants with stable adherence had a significantly higher mean cMPR compared with those with variable adherence (0.86 ± 0.16 vs. 0.66 ± 0.17, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference between groups of patients with different degrees of mean cMPR and mean weight was observed (p = 0.011). Patients with a mean cMPR ≥0.80 weighed significantly more than those with moderate and low adherence. In addition, mean weight correlated significantly with the mean cMPR (Β [95% confidence interval] = 14.845 [0.191-29.498], r = 0.269, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the cMPR was easy to assess and showed that adherence was probably better than expected. The association of cMPR with weight should be further investigated. Stable adherence seemed to be related to high adherence. This observation could enhance our understanding of people with CF and their approach to treatment.

Pulmonary medication adherence among children and adults with cystic fibrosis: Is there an association with disease severity?

BACKGROUND: Adherence to pulmonary medication is pivotal in delaying the progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). Further exploring the consequences of poor adherence and its impact on disease severity may be valuable to personalize CF treatment strategy. AIM: To evaluate indicators of disease severity among children and adults with CF and investigate which of them are related to pulmonary medication adherence. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data of children and adults followed up in one pediatric and one adult CF Unit were evaluated over 4 years. Disease severity was assessed by measuring body mass index (BMI), lung function, history of pulmonary exacerbations, and medication complexity. Adherence was assessed by calculating a 12-month medication possession ratio (MPR) for each pulmonary medication and then averaged for a composite MPR (cMPR) for each patient. Regression analysis was performed to explore the association of adherence with disease severity. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included in our study, 52 children and 43 adults. The overall cMPR was 0.74 (SD = 0.25); 0.68 (SD = 0.24) for children and 0.81 (SD = 0.24) for adults. Adults presented higher adherence, with overall mean cMPR 0.81 (SD = 0.24) compared to children with mean cMPR 0.68 (SD = 0.24) (p < 0.05, 95% CI = -0.27 to -0.03). Adherence was inversely related to FEV1 % predicted (ß = -0.002, 95% CI = -0.004 to 0, p = 0.023) and FVC% predicted (ß = -0.003, 95% CI = -0.005 to -0.001, p = 0.006) in regression analysis. Adherence was not found to be associated with BMI, history of exacerbations and medication complexity. The analysis of each medication showed that adherence to Dornase-alpha, Tobramycin and Colomycin was significantly related to specific disease severity indicators. CONCLUSION: An overall moderate to high level of adherence was found among our study population. Adults presented higher adherence compared to children. FEV1% and FVC% predicted were related to a significant decrease in adherence. Among our group of CF patients with an overall moderate to high level of adherence, adherence to pulmonary medication was inversely related to disease severity.

Oral antidiabetic medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to measure the adherence rates of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and assess the relationship of glycaemic control and adherence to OADs after controlling for other associated factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTING: Large tertiary hospital in the central region of Saudi Arabia. PARTICIPANTS: 5457patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with T2DM during the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The modified medication possession ratio (mMPR) was calculated as a proxy measure for adherence of OADs. The factors associated with OADs non-adherence and medication oversupply were assessed using multinomial logistic regression models. The secondary outcomes were to measure the association between OADs adherence and glycaemic control. RESULTS: Majority of patients with T2DM were females (n=3400, 62.3%). The average glycated haemoglobin was 8.2±1.67. Among the study population, 48.6% had good adherence (mMPR >0.8) and 8.6% had a medication oversupply (mMPR >1.2). Good adherence was highest among those using repaglinide (71.0%) followed by pioglitazone (65.0%) and sitagliptin (59.0%). In the multivariate analysis, women with T2DM were more likely to have poor adherence (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.76, 95% CI=0.67, 0.86) compared with men. Also, medication oversupply was more likely among patients with hyperpolypharmacy (AOR=1.88, 95% CI=1.36, 2.63), comorbid osteoarthritis (AOR=1.72, 95% CI=1.20, 02.45) and non-Saudi patients (AOR=1.53, 95% CI=1.16, 2.01). However, no association was found between glycaemic control and adherence to OADs. CONCLUSION: The study findings support the growing concern of non-adherence to OADs among patients with T2DM in Saudi Arabia. Decision makers have to invest in behavioural interventions that will boost medication adherence rates. This is particularly important in patients with polypharmacy and high burden of comorbid conditions.

The importance of inhaler devices: the choice of inhaler device may lead to suboptimal adherence in COPD patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify factors associated with poor adherence to COPD treatment in patients receiving a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß2-agonist (ICS/LABA), focusing on the importance of inhaler devices. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and multicenter study based on a review of medical registries between 2007 and 2012 of COPD patients (n=1,263) treated with ICS/LABA FDC, whose medical devices were either dry powder inhalers (DPIs) or pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI). Medication adherence included persistence outcomes through 18 months and medication possession ratios. Data on exacerbations, comorbidities, demographic characteristics, and health care resource utilization were also included as confounders of adherence. RESULTS: The analyses revealed that COPD patients whose medication was delivered through a DPI were less likely to have medication adherence compared to patients with pMDI, after adjusting for confounding factors, especially active ingredients. Younger groups of patients were less likely to be adherent compared to the oldest group. Smoker men were less likely to be adherent compared to women and non-smokers. Comorbidities decreased the probability of treatment adherence. Those patients that visited their doctor once a month were more likely to adhere to their medication regimen; however, suboptimal adherence was more likely to occur among those patients who visited more than three times per month their doctor. We also found that worsening of COPD is negatively associated with adherence. CONCLUSION: According to this study, inhaler devices influence patients' adherence to long-term COPD medication. We also found that DPIs delivering ICS/LABA FDC had a negative impact on adherence. Patients' clinic and socioeconomic characteristics were associated with adherence.

Knowledge and health literacy are not associated with osteoporotic medication adherence, however income is, in Arab postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between adherence with oral bisphosphonate treatment, income, health literacy, knowledge, and receiving instructions from a pharmacist or doctor, among Arab postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis in Israel. METHODS: Arab osteoporotic women treated with oral bisphosphonates were interviewed (303 women). The questionnaire included socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge about osteoporosis and health literacy. Adherence was measured by the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) according to the number of prescription refills registered in the database of Clalit Health Services. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the women were adherent according to the MPR. The main predictor of adherence in a multivariate logistic regression was income. Health literacy and knowledge were not associated with adherence after adjustment for income. Neither was the health care provider's counseling regarding the medication. CONCLUSIONS: Lower income seems to be a barrier to adherence with osteoporotic medication, over and above other known barriers. Policy makers should take into account that medication funding may be a barrier to treatment. Practical implications Income may be a major barrier to adherance with osteoporosis medication and calls for attention of practiciner.