Water-cooled microwave ablation array for bloodless rapid transection of the liver.

BACKGROUND: Microwaves (MWs) deliver relatively high temperatures into biological tissue and cover a large ablation zone. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of water-cooled double-needle MW ablation arrays in assisting the hepatic transection of an in vivo pig model. METHODS: Our research program comprised computer modeling, tissue-mimicking phantom experiments, and in vivo pig liver experiments. Computer modeling was based on the finite element method (FEM) to evaluate ablation temperature distributions. In tissue-mimicking phantom and in vivo pig liver ablation experiments, the performances of the water-cooled MW ablation array and conventional clamp crushing liver resection were compared. RESULTS: FEM showed that the maximum lateral ablation diameter at 100 W output and a duration of 60 s was 3 cm (assessed at 50 °C isotherm). In the phantom, the maximum transverse ablation diameter of the double-needle MW ablation increased rapidly to 3 cm in 60 s at 50 W. The blood loss and blood loss per transection area in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B (18 (7-26) ml vs. 34 (19-57) ml, and 2.4 (2-3.1) ml/cm2 vs. 6.9 (3.2-8.3) ml/cm2, respectively) (p < 0.05). The transection speed in Group A (2.6(1.9-3.8) cm2/min) was significantly faster than that in Group B (1.7(1.1-2.2) cm2/min) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this experimental model, the new water-cooled MW array-assisted liver resection (LR) has the potential advantage of less blood loss and rapid removal than the conventional LR.

Computer modeling and in vitro experimental study of water-cooled microwave ablation array.

INTRODUCTION: Microwaves (MWs) quickly deliver relatively high temperatures into tumors and cover a large ablation zone. We present a research protocol for using water-cooled double-needle MW ablation arrays for tumor ablation here. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our research program includes computer modeling, tissue-mimicking phantom experiments, and in vitro swine liver experiments. The computer modeling is based on the finite element method (FEM) to evaluate ablation temperature distributions. In tissue-mimicking phantom and in vitro swine liver ablation experiments, the performances of the new device and the single-needle MW device currently used in clinical practice are compared. RESULTS: FEM shows that the maximum transverse ablation diameter (MTAD) is 4.2 cm at 100 W output and 300 s (assessed at the 50 °C isotherm). In the tissue-mimicking phantom, the MTDA is 2.6 cm at 50 W and 300 s in single-needle MW ablation, and 4 cm in double needle MW ablation array. In in vitro swine liver experiments, the MTAD is 2.820 ± 0.127 cm at 100 W and 300 s in single-needle MW ablation, and 3.847 ± 0.103 cm in MW ablation array. CONCLUSION: A new type of water-cooled MW ablation array is designed and tested, and has potential advantages over currently used devices.