Parental Psychological Distress of Missed Diagnosis of Down Syndrome at Antenatal Screening: A Rare, but Still Real Occurrence - A Case Report and Review of Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal screening programs are important components for pregnant women care and are often linked with grief and shock based on gestational age or the diagnosis. Lower/no sensitivity is also associated with these screening programs leading to providing false-negative outputs. CASE PRESENTATION: Present work shows a case of missed antenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and its persistant medical and psychological impact on the family members. We have also discussed the relevant economic and medical-legal issues related to the context and aimed to maintain an adequate awareness among healthcare to discuss properly these investigations (difference between screening and diagnostic testing), their possible outcome (chances of false results) and enabled the pregnant women/couple to take informed decision on early pregnancy. CONCLUSION: These programs are considered as routine clinical practice in many countries from last few years and are necessary to assess the pros and cons of these programs. One of the prime cons involves the likeliness of obtaining a false-negative result due to lack of 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities using the semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) in Southern China.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used to screen for fetal aneuploidies, including fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs). However, there is less information on the performance of NIPT in detecting SCAs. METHODS: A cohort of 47,800 pregnancies was recruited to review the high-risk NIPT results for SCAs. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted and sequenced. All NIPT high-risk cases were recommended to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis for karyotyping analysis and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). RESULTS: A total of 238 high-risk cases were detected by NIPT, including 137 cases of 45,X, 27 cases of 47,XXX, and 74 cases of 47,XYY/47,XXY. Prenatal diagnosis, including karyotyping analysis and CMA, was available in 170 cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 30.00% for 45,X, 70.58% for 47,XXX, and 81.13% for 47,XYY/47,XXY. In addition, 13 cases of sex chromosome mosaicism and 9 cases of sex chromosome CNVs were incidentally found in this study. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that NIPT was reliable for screening SCAs based on a large sample, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies than monosomy X. Our study will provide an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further processing of the results.

Noninvasive prenatal testing and maternal obesity: A review.

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become a popular screening test for the most common fetal aneuploidies. The performance of NIPT is affected by several factors including maternal obesity, which results in a greater rate of no-calls for obese pregnant women. Guidelines regarding NIPT in prenatal screening have been published, but with few and divergent recommendations on the issue. We aimed to review the medical literature, guidelines from scientific societies and information material from commercial NIPT providers on no-calls and maternal obesity. We systematically identified medical literature and guidelines from scientific societies using the database MEDLINE. Information material from commercial NIPT providers was found via a systematic search on Google.com. Nine medical studies investigating the association between maternal obesity and NIPT no-calls were included. They all showed the same trend: increasing no-call rate with increasing maternal obesity. The no-call rate ranged from 0% to 4.2% for women with body mass index (BMI) 18.5-24.9 and from 5.4% to 70.1% for women BMI ≥40. We identified 17 scientific societies with guidelines and 13 commercial NIPT providers. All were checked for information material on no-calls and maternal obesity. To allow comparison, all guidelines were examined to answer the same three predefined questions. Of the 17 included scientific societies, 13 (76.5%) mentioned the association between maternal obesity and NIPT no-calls, two (11.8%) specified weight limits and three (17.6%) advised against NIPT for severely obese pregnant women. None of the 13 commercial NIPT providers provided specific recommendations, but four (30.8%) cite maternal obesity as a potential cause for a no-call. Because of the increasing number of patients in this group, we advocate updated recommendations to guide decision making in prenatal screening for obese pregnant women.

Does Maternal Body Mass Index Affect the Quantity of Circulating Fetal Cells Available to Use for Cell-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Test in High-Risk Pregnancies?

We present the first study that investigates the effect of maternal body mass index (BMI) on the quantity of circulating fetal cells available to use in cell-based noninvasive prenatal test (cbNIPT). cbNIPT has been proposed as a superior alternative to noninvasive prenatal test from cell-free fetal DNA. Kølvraa et al. [Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec; 36(12): 1127-34] established that cbNIPT can be performed on as few as one fetal cell, and Vestergaard et al. [Prenat Diagn. 2017 Nov; 37(11): 1120-4] demonstrated that these fetal trophoblast cells could be used successfully in cbNIPT to detect chromosomal and sub-chromosomal abnormalities. This study on 91 pregnant women with high-risk pregnancies suggests that cbNIPT should not be hampered by an increased BMI because every pregnancy, irrespective of the BMI, has rendered fetal cells for downstream genetic analysis. The mean number of fetal cells per sample was 12.6, with a range of 1-43 cells in one sample. ANOVA showed that increasing maternal BMI tends to decrease the number of fetal cells, but not significantly.

Effective Fetal Epigenetic Biomarkers for Noninvasive Fetal Trisomy 21 Detections.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, we identified three novel fetal-specific epigenetic DNA regions (FSERs) on chromosome 21 for detection of noninvasive fetal trisomy 21 (T21). In this study, the diagnostic accuracies of the three FSERs were assessed on a larger panel of the first-trimester pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was conducted with maternal plasma collected from 167 pregnant women carrying 155 chromosomally normal and 12 T21 fetuses (10-13 gestational weeks). Accuracies of FSERs for noninvasive prenatal test of fetal T21 were estimated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The levels of all FSERs increased in pregnant women with T21 fetuses when compared with controls (p < 0.001 for all). The levels of the three FSERs did not differ according to maternal age, body mass index, and fetal sex at maternal blood sampling (p > 0.05 for all). In noninvasive fetal T21 detection, the AUC of FSER1, FSER2, and FSER3 were 0.859 (95% CI: 0.746-0.972), 0.919 (95% CI: 0.856-0.982), and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.746-0.990), respectively. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study suggest that all FSERs may be useful for noninvasive fetal T21 detection, regardless of maternal age, body mass index, and fetal sex.

Impact of noninvasive prenatal testing in regionally dispersed medical centers in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA is a new alternative to screen for common fetal aneuploidies. It is not known what impact regional location may play on noninvasive prenatal testing implementation and downstream invasive prenatal procedure use in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Six different regionally based centers collected data on noninvasive prenatal testing indication and results between February and November 2012, as well as their invasive prenatal procedure rates before and after offering noninvasive prenatal testing. Statistical analyses were performed using the 2-proportion Z-test. RESULTS: Of 1477 patients who underwent noninvasive prenatal testing; 693 (47%) were from centers in the West; 522 (35.3%) from centers in the East; and 262 (17.7%) from 1 center in the Midwest. Statistically significant differences were observed between West Coast and nonWest Coast sites for gestational age (14.1 weeks; P ≤ .0001). Advanced maternal age (AMA-only) was the most frequent indication in 5 of 6 sites (range, 21.8-62.9%) A total of 98 invasive prenatal procedures performed on 94 (6.4%) patients of which 64 (65.3%) were performed at centers in the West. More invasive procedures were performed following negative noninvasive prenatal testing results (n = 61) than abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing results (n = 30). The overall rate of patients undergoing invasive procedure after an abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing result was 32.6% (30 of 92). All 6 centers reported a decrease in invasive procedure volume after noninvasive prenatal testing introduction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates differences in clinical implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing across regionally dispersed centers in the United States, suggesting patient demographics and views toward prenatal testing influence use as well as downstream management.

Noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: challenges for implementation in Australia.

The term 'Non invasive prenatal testing' is used to describe the rapidly emerging molecular technologies related to cell free DNA assessment that are being applied to prenatal screening for Down syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities. This technology is now available to Australian women through a number of off-shore laboratories. We review the basis of this method of testing, the literature describing the effectiveness of NIPT in screening for trisomy 21 and the potential methods by which this tool could be incorporated into current screening strategies.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Uniparental Disomy in Cases of Rare Autosomal Trisomies Detected Using Noninvasive Prenatal Test: A Case of Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) other than common aneuploidies can be detected using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). However, conventional karyotyping is insufficient for evaluating diploid fetuses with uniparental disomy (UPD) due to trisomy rescue. Using the diagnostic process for Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), we aim to describe the need for additional prenatal diagnostic testing for confirming UPD in fetuses diagnosed with RATs via NIPT and its clinical implications. NIPT was performed using the massively parallel sequencing (MPS) method, and all pregnant women with RATs underwent amniocentesis. After confirming the normal karyotype, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) were performed to detect UPD. Overall, six cases were diagnosed with RATs. There was a suspicion of trisomies of chromosomes 7, 8, and 15 in two cases each. However, these cases were confirmed to have a normal karyotype using amniocentesis. In one of six cases, PWS caused by maternal UPD 15 was diagnosed using MS-PCR and MS-MLPA. We propose that in cases where RAT is detected by NIPT, UPD should be considered following trisomy rescue. Even if amniocentesis confirms a normal karyotype, UPD testing (such as MS-PCR and MS-MLPA) should be recommended for accurate assessment, as an accurate diagnosis can lead to appropriate genetic counseling and improved overall pregnancy management.

XX Male: Early Detection With Prenatal Testing.

A 46,XX male represents a variant of Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), under the category of a disorder of sex development (DSD). Despite possessing an XX karyotype, these individuals exhibit a male phenotype, which, in this case, results from a translocation of the SRY gene from the Y chromosome onto the X chromosome. This genetic alteration results in the development of male gonadal characteristics. This case report outlines a prenatal diagnosis of a 46,XX female in conflict with a level 2 ultrasound. It details the patient's presentation, diagnosis of an SRY-positive 46,XX male, and medical history. The discussion focuses on the advantages of early identification and intervention in managing symptom progression and addressing fertility challenges through hormone replacement therapy. Further exploration of 46,XX DSD early detection and the underlying mechanisms is essential for refining diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that result in a greater quality of life for these patients.

Application of ultrasound combined with noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal testing.

BACKGROUND: Both noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and prenatal ultrasound are widely used in clinical settings due to their safety, noninvasiveness, and accuracy, showing high detection rates for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and structural abnormalities. However, whether the combined application of these two techniques has higher clinical applicability remains to be demonstrated. METHODS: The clinical and laboratory data of 3,050 pregnant women who underwent NIPT were collected. The clinical feasibility and health economics of NIPT were investigated by analyzing the accuracy, postnatal follow-up results, and population applicability of NIPT. In addition, an analysis ultrasonography, NIPT, and karyotyping results were performed to evaluate the combined application of ultrasonography and NIPT in screening fetal chromosomal abnormalities. RESULTS: NIPT could accurately detect trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and was highly sensitive and specific in detecting other autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies. The positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the presence of 1 or 2 or more ultrasound markers were 7.5% and 29.2%, respectively, indicating that ultrasonography combined with NIPT should be preferred for the detection of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Health economic analysis revealed NIPT to be superior to conventional serologic screening in terms of accuracy and socioeconomics. Ultrasound and NIPT are complementary to each other and the combined techniques can improve the screening ability of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and provide clinicians with more diagnostic information.

Genome wide noninvasive prenatal testing detects microduplication of the distal end of chromosome 15 in a fetus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the most recent modality widely used in prenatal diagnostics. Commercially available NIPT has high sensitivity and specificity for the common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. As future advancements in NIPT sequencing technology are becoming promising and more reliable, the ability to detect beyond aneuploidies and to expand detection of submicroscopic genomic alterations, as well as single-gene disorders might become possible. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a case of a 34-year-old pregnant woman, G2P1, who had NIPT screening which detected a terminal microduplication of 10.34 Mb on the long arm of chromosome 15 (15q26.1q26.3). Subsequent prenatal diagnostic testing including karyotype, microarray and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed. Microarray testing confirmed and particularized a copy number gain of 10.66 Mb of the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 15. The G-banding cytogenetic studies yielded results consistent with unbalanced translocation between chromosome 15 and 18. To further characterize the abnormality involving the long arm of chromosome 18 and to map the genomic location of the duplicated 15q more precisely, FISH analysis using specific sub-telomeric probes was performed. FISH analysis confirmed that the extra duplicated segment of chromosome 15 is translocated onto the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 18 at band 18q23. Parental karyotype and FISH studies were performed to see if this unbalanced rearrangement was inherited from a healthy balanced translocation carrier versus being a de novo finding. Parental chromosomal analysis provided no evidence of a rearrangement between chromosome 15 and chromosome 18. The final fetal karyotype was reported as 46,XX,der(18)t(15;18)(q26.2;q23)dn. CONCLUSIONS: In this case study, the microduplication of fetal chromosome 15q26.1q26.3 was accurately detected using NIPT. Our results suggest that further refinements in NIPT have the potential to evolve to a powerful and efficient screening method, which might be used to detect a broad range of chromosomal imbalances. Since microduplications and microdeletions are a potential reportable result with NIPT, this must be included in pre-test counseling. Prenatal diagnostic testing of such findings is strongly recommended.

Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of a Paternally Inherited MEN1 Pathogenic Splicing Variant.

CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in the tumor suppressor gene MEN1. The uncertainty of pathogenicity of MEN1 variants complexifies the selection of the patients likely to benefit from specific care. OBJECTIVE: MEN1-mutated patients should be offered tailored tumor screening and genetic counseling. We present a patient with hyperparathyroidism for whom genetic analysis identified a variant of uncertain significance in the MEN1 gene (NM_130799.2): c.654G > T p.(Arg218=). Additional functional genetic tests were performed to classify the variant as pathogenic and allowed prenatal testing. DESIGN: Targeted next generation sequencing identified a synonymous variant in the MEN1 gene in a 26-year-old male with symptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. In silico and in vitro genetic tests were performed to assess variant pathogenicity. RESULTS: Genetic testing of the proband's unaffected parents showed the variant occurred de novo. Transcript study showed a splicing defect leading to an in-frame deletion. The classification of the MEN1 variant as pathogenic confirmed the diagnosis of MEN1 and recommended an adapted medical care and follow-up. Pathogenic classification also allowed to propose a genetic counseling to the proband and his wife. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis was performed with a personalized medicine-based protocol by detection of the paternally inherited variant in maternal plasmatic cell free DNA, using digital PCR. CONCLUSION: We showed that functional genetic analysis can help to assess the pathogenicity of a MEN1 variant with crucial consequences for medical care and genetic counseling decisions.

Validation of a New Protocol to Collect and Isolate Plasma from Pregnant Women for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT).

BACKGROUND: Most laboratories use specialized tubes (e.g., Streck) to recover circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). We validated a low cost, simple procedure for collecting NIPT samples in remote laboratories that avoids highspeed centrifugation. EDTA gel blood sampling tube allows simple separation of plasma from blood cells. Decanted plasma is filtered to remove cell debris. The procedure can be performed within a few minutes after the blood centrifugation step, and ccfDNA-grade plasma can be frozen for transportation. METHODS: We recruited 51 pregnant women and collected blood in one EDTA-gel Greiner tube and two Streck tubes. All tubes were centrifuged at 1600 g x 10 min within 6 h of sample collection. Plasma from EDTA tubes was poured into a syringe cylinder and filtered through a 0.45 µm Millipore filter. Plasma from Streck tubes was recovered with a pipette and one was filtered as above while the second was centrifuged at 16 000 g. The ccfDNA was isolated and NGS sequencing libraries were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina system. Fetal fractions were estimated using SeqFF. This study had a power of 79% to detect a decrease of 1% in fetal fractions with the new method. RESULTS: We did not observe any significant difference between the three procedures for the fetal fraction nor for the quality or quantity of libraries produced. CONCLUSION: EDTA-gel tubes with filtration provide high quality plasma for ccfDNA analysis and can be sent frozen to the NIPT laboratory. This is economical and it frees the laboratory of time-consuming steps.

Expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy and copy number variations and parental willingness for invasive diagnosis in a cohort of 18,516 cases.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been wildly used to screen for common aneuplodies. In recent years, the test has been expanded to detect rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and copy number variations (CNVs). This study was performed to investigate the performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (expanded NIPT) in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs), and copy number variations (CNVs) and parental willingness for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese prenatal diagnosis center. METHODS: A total of 24,702 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed at the Women and Children's Hospital from January 2013 to April 2019, among which expanded NIPT had been successfully conducted in 24,702 pregnant women. The high-risk expanded NIPT results were validated by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis. All the tested pregnant women were followed up for pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 24,702 cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 98.77% (401/446) of cases with common trisomies and SCAs, 91.95% (80/87) of RAT and CNV cases, and 76.25% (18,429/24,169) of cases with low-risk screening results. The sensitivity of expanded NIPT was 100% (95% confidence interval[CI], 97.38-100%), 96.67%(95%CI, 82.78-99.92%), and 100%(95%CI, 66.37-100.00%), and the specificity was 99.92%(95%CI, 99.87-99.96%), 99.96%(95%CI, 99.91-99.98%), and 99.88% (95%CI, 99.82-99.93%) for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Expanded NIPT detected 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, XYY syndrome, RATs, and CNVs with positive predictive values of 25.49%, 75%, 94.12%, 76.19%, 6.45%, and 50%, respectively. The women carrying fetuses with Trisomy 21/Trisomy 18/Trisomy 13 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminated their pregnancies at higher rates than those at high risk for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the expanded NIPT detects fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of detecting SCAs, RATs, and CNVs is still relatively poor and needs to be improved. With a high-risk expanded NIPT result, the women at high risk for common trisomies are more likely to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures and terminate their pregnancies than those with unusual chromosome abnormalities.

Terminal deletion of chromosome 13 in a fetus with normal NIPT: The added value of invasive prenatal diagnosis in the NIPT era.

In the age of noninvasive prenatal testing, there is still an important role for invasive prenatal diagnosis, even for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21.

Noninvasive Detection of Fetal Aneuploidy Using Next Generation Sequencing.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) utilizing next generation sequencing (NGS) is a highly sensitive and specific approach designed to screen for fetal aneuploidy. NIPT was first introduced in 2011 and has been rapidly adopted in a clinical setting because of the improved performance afforded compared with traditional prenatal serum screening options. We describe a PCR-free, paired-end sequencing-based NIPT, the VeriSeq NIPT Solution. This NIPT screens for fetal aneuploidy of chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y. Using the validated approach detailed here, users can achieve high sensitivities and specificities for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 as well as sex chromosome aneuploidies with low failure rates. The automated workflow can be completed in 1 day, with only 2 h of hands-on time from a single technician.

A Pilot Study of Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Alpha- and Beta-Thalassemia with Target Capture Sequencing of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Maternal Blood.

AIMS: Thalassemia is a dangerous hematolytic genetic disease. In south China, ∼24% Chinese carry alpha-thalassemia or beta-thalassemia gene mutations. Given the fact that the invasive sampling procedures can only be performed by professionals in experienced centers, it may increase the risk of miscarriage or infection. Thus, most people are worried about the invasive operation. As such, a noninvasive and accurate prenatal diagnosis is needed for appropriate genetic counseling for families with high risks. Here we sought to develop capture probes and their companion analysis methods for the noninvasive prenatal detection of deletional and nondeletional thalassemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two families diagnosed as carriers of either beta-thalassemia gene or Southeast Asian deletional alpha-thalassemia gene mutation were recruited. The maternal plasma and amniotic fluid were collected for prenatal diagnosis. Probes targeting exons of the genes of interest and the highly heterozygous SNPs within the 1Mb flanking region were designed. The target capture sequencing was performed with plasma DNA from the pregnant woman and genomic DNA from the couples and their children. Then the parental haplotype was constructed by the trios-based strategy. The fetal haplotype was deduced from the parental haplotype with a hidden Markov model-based algorithm. RESULTS: The fetal genotypes were successfully deduced in both families noninvasively. The noninvasively constructed haplotypes of both fetuses were identical to the invasive prenatal diagnosis results with an accuracy rate of 100% in the target region. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the effective noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of alpha-thalassemia and beta-thalassemia can be achieved with the targeted capture sequencing and the haplotype-assisted analysis method.

Maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome causes discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficiency of noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) identifying fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, 917 women with high-risk pregnancies were invited to participate in an NIPT trial based on an Illumina HiSeq massively parallel sequencing platform. Abnormal cases in NIPT were validated by karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. All of the participants' infants were examined clinically and followed up for at least 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 35 (3.82%) high-risk pregnancies were detected with abnormal results in NIPT, which included 25 cases (2.73%) of trisomy 21 (Tri21), four cases (0.44%) of trisomy 18 (Tri18), four cases (0.44%) of Turner syndrome (45, X), one cases (0.11%) of Klinefelter's syndrome (47, XXY), and one cases (0.11%) with lower X chromosome concentration. Further validation indicated that one case of Tri18 and the case with lower X chromosome concentration were false positive results (0.22%) in NIPT. Furthermore, it was found that the false positive case with lower X chromosome concentration in NIPT was caused by maternal sex chromosomal mosaicism (45, X and 46, XX). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome could cause discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with NIPT. We highly recommended that maternal karyotype should be confirmed for the cases with abnormal results in NIPT.