Assessing the nutritional status and impact of a series of nutritional interventions on elderly inpatients using bioelectrical impedance analysis: A service evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to use bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to assess nutritional status of elderly patients admitted to hospital and quantitatively measure the impact of the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (CAVUHB) model ward. Secondary objectives were to assess the feasibility of using BIA in this patient population and compare nutrition risk screening tools against fat-free mass index (FFMI). METHODS: A prospective, comparative, single-centre, service evaluation of a 'model ward for nutrition and hydration' undertaken in medical and rehabilitation beds in a large UK teaching hospital. RESULTS: A total of 450 BIA measurements were taken using a Bodystat Multiscan 5000 on 162 patients; several patients had repeated measurements during their hospital stay. Patients tolerated the procedure well, but lack of accurate weight, implanted medical devices and tissue viability precluded some participants. CONCLUSIONS: BIA is quick, non-invasive, simple to complete and can elicit huge data about an individual's body composition. In a larger cohort of medical admissions, BIA could assist in identifying the sensitivity and specificity of the nutrition screening tools. The collective benefit of a series of nutritional interventions preserved nutritional status better in this elderly inpatient population than usual models of care. Although results were not statistically significant, there is an opportunity with the new model of care to better support frail patients and prevent deconditioning.

Nutritional risk screening in malignant tumors: a study of 375 cancer inpatients.

Malnutrition is a common complication in cancer patients. It often accelerates disease progression and affects treatment outcomes. Thus, in the early census of cancer patients, examination for possible nutritional risks and correcting potential causes of malnutrition are needed to improve patients' quality of life. Our study included 375 patients diagnosed with cancer in Henan province and analyzed the relationship between nutritional risk and indicators like age, serum albumin, serum prealbumin, serum hemoglobin, tumor stage, tumor type, and inflammatory factors. We found that age, hemoglobin, and presence of gastrointestinal tumors were independent risk factors for nutritional risk. We also found significant correlation between inflammatory factors and nutritional risk in cancer patients, so as to provide new prediction indexes for clinical management of nutritional risk and dynamic changes of nutritional status.

NUTRITIONAL RISK SCREENING IN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL PATIENTS AT THE RIJEKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTRE.

Malnutrition is usually related to some diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, chronic pancreatitis, chronic liver disease and malignant tumors. It is characterized by weight loss, protein deficiency, and deficit of specific nutrients. The aim was to estimate the prevalence of nutritional risk among 160 gastrointestinal patients by use of the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) score at hospital admission and discharge. The patients stayed in the hospital between 5 and 15 days or longer. Results showed that 40% of patients at admission and 36.2% at discharge were malnourished. There were 53.1% of patients with recognized malnutrition at admission that received nutritional support, whereas at discharge 34.4% of patients at risk were not dietary supported. Malnourished patients were significantly older, had lower body mass index, longer hospital stay and higher rate of malignant diseases than properly nourished patients. Regular screening for malnutrition should be conveyed in hospitals as to provide appropriate dietary support for all patients at risk.

Nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma are notably susceptible to high nutritional risks. If not addressed, this susceptibility can lead to malnutrition, resulting in numerous adverse clinical outcomes. Despite the significance of this issue, there is limited comprehensive research on the topic. Objective: The objective of our study was to identify nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: For this cross-sectional study, we recruited a total of 377 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 tool was used to assess their nutritional risk. These patients were divided into a well-nourished group (n = 222) and a nutritional risk group (n = 155). Potential risk factors were screened out using univariate analysis (p < 0.1). These factors were subsequently analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05) to identify the nutritional risk factors for these patients. Results: Our findings indicated that increasing age (OR = 1.085, 95%CI: 1.053-1.117, p < 0.001), high number of radiation treatments (OR = 1.103, 95%CI: 1.074-1.132, p < 0.001), low BMI (OR = 0.700, 95%CI: 0.618-0.793, p < 0.001), and low albumin levels (OR = 0.852, 95%CI: 0.789-0.921, p < 0.001) are significant nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Conclusion: Increasing age, high number of radiation treatments, low BMI, and low albumin levels are significant nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Physician Perspectives on Malnutrition Screening, Diagnosis, and Management: A Qualitative Analysis.

Malnutrition is an important clinical entity that is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, in part due to a lack of education and different perceptions by healthcare providers on its value in medical practice. Given this void, the purpose of this qualitative study was to explore physicians' clinical perspectives on malnutrition care, including its prevalence in their practice, and potential barriers that might preclude the delivery of malnutrition care. Using a directed content qualitative analysis approach, a total of 22 general and subspecialist physicians across three Canadian provinces were interviewed using a series of standardized questions developed by a multidisciplinary research team. Responses were transcribed and then analyzed using NVivo Version 14 software. While physicians recognized the importance of malnutrition screening and treatment, they did not view themselves as the primary drivers and often deferred this responsibility to dietitians. Lack of standard malnutrition screening, education amongst allied healthcare providers, time, personnel, and referral processes to have patients assessed and managed for malnutrition were also identified as contributing factors. For physicians, malnutrition education, standard malnutrition screening during patient encounters, and access to the necessary tools to manage malnutrition using a more centralized approach and standard referral process were viewed as strategies with the potential to improve the ability of the physician to identify and manage disease-related malnutrition and its negative consequences.

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition and outcomes prediction in emergency abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Malnutrition has adverse postoperative outcomes, especially in emergency surgery. Among the numerous tools for nutritional assessment, this study aims to investigate malnutrition diagnosed by Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition predictive value for outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Among the 468 patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery admitted to a department of emergency surgery from June 2020 to December 2021, 53 patients were not eligible for enrollment, and 19 patients had missing data. Thus, the final number of participants was 396. Muscle mass was evaluated by skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra on computed tomography scans, and the lower quartile was defined as the threshold of muscle mass reduction. The associations of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition, Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (muscle mass reduction excluded), and skeletal muscle index with in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and postoperative stay were evaluated using χ2. In addition, confounding factors were screened, regression models were established, and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition predictive value was analyzed for clinical outcome. Ethical approval was obtained from the appropriate department. RESULTS: Malnutrition was observed in 19.9% of the total 396 patients based on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and in 12.4% on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (muscle mass reduction excluded). Sarcopenia by skeletal muscle index was found in 24.7% of patients. Univariate analysis indicated that in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, infective complication rate, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly higher in malnourished and sarcopenic patients. Multivariate analysis found that malnutrition diagnosed by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition was predictive for complications, infective complications, and postoperative stay (total postoperative complications: odds ratio = 3.620; 95% CI, 1.635-8.015; P = 0.002; infective complications: odds ratio = 3.127; 95% CI, 1.194-8.192; P = 0.020; and postoperative stay: regression coefficient = 2.622; P = 0.022). The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (muscle mass reduction excluded) identified postoperative complications and postoperative stay (total postoperative complications: odds ratio = 3.364; 95% CI, 1.247-9.075; P = 0.017 and postoperative stay: regression coefficient = 3.547; P = 0.009). Sarcopenia by skeletal muscle index was a risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio = 3.366; 95% CI, 1.587-7.140; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutritison (muscle mass reduction excluded) had predictive value for adverse clinical outcomes due to malnutrition in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.

Association between nutritional risk status and health related quality of life: An investigation on the aging patients with cardiovascular disease.

Introduction: Acknowledging the considerable influence of undernutrition on health outcomes and HRQOL, this study sought to appraise the nutritional risk status of elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) through the utilization of the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS). Additionally, the investigation aimed to evaluate the correlation between NRS status and HRQOL within the context of patients referred to a cardiac hospital in Tabriz, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Tabriz, Iran. The participants were selected randomly from patients referring to Shahid Madani Heart Hospital, a comprehensive university hospital during July to December 2018. A linear regression was used for control of confounding variables (age, gender, education level, marital status, and income levels) and predict the relationship between nutrition risk status and HQRL. Results: Of the 200 patients with CVD participated in this study, 68 (34%) of participants had normal nutrition status, 108 (54%) were at risk for undernutrition, and 24 (12%) had undernutrition. A total of 24 aging patients with undernutrition, 13 (54%) were divorced or widowed. 86% of patients with diabetes were at risk for undernutrition and 13.9% had undernutrition. There were statistically significant relationship between undernutrition and HRQOL dimensions, age, gender, and marital status. Conclusion: The study revealed a correlation between elevated undernutrition scores in patients and factors such as older age, female gender, and marital status of being divorced or widowed. Furthermore, the results imply that a notable elevation in the risk score for undernutrition in patients is significantly linked to impaired HRQOL among elderly individuals with CVD.

Nutritional status in patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis and new nutritional risk screening model for active tuberculosis: a national, multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant challenge for public health and is closely associated with malnutrition; however, few studies have attempted to screen malnutrition among TB patients. The study aimed to evaluate the nutrition status and build a new nutritional screening model for active TB. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, large cross-sectional study was conducted in China from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021. All included patients diagnosed with active pulmonary TB (PTB) were evaluated both by Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to screen the risk factors associated with malnutrition, and a new screening risk model, mainly for TB patients, was constructed. Results: A total of 14,941 cases meeting the inclusion criteria were entered into the final analysis. The malnutrition risk rate among PTB patients in China was 55.86% and 42.70%, according to the NRS 2002 and GLIM, respectively. The inconsistency rate between the two methods was 24.77%. A total of 11 clinical factors, including elderly, low body mass index (BMI), decreased lymphocyte cells, taking immunosuppressive agents, co-pleural TB, diabetes mellitus (DM), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), severe pneumonia, decreased food intake within a week, weight loss and dialysis were identified as independent risk factors of malnutrition based on multivariate analyses. A new nutritional risk screening model was constructed for TB patients with a diagnostic sensitivity of 97.6% and specificity of 93.1%. Conclusions: Active TB patients have severe malnutrition status according to screening by the NRS 2002 and GLIM criteria. The new screening model is recommended for PTB patients as it is more closely tailored to the characteristics of TB.

Malnutrition screening tool use in a New Zealand hospital: Reliability and rates of malnutrition screening on admission.

AIMS: This research aimed to assess the rate and reliability of routine nurse-completed malnutrition screening and report the prevalence of malnutrition risk on admission to Christchurch Hospital. METHODS: Student dietitians administered the Malnutrition Screening Tool to patients in three speciality wards within 48 h of admission. Student dietitians' Malnutrition Screening Tool scores were compared against documented nurse-completed Malnutrition Screening Tool scores. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and Cohen's kappa tests (interrater reliability ⱪ). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Student dietitians, using the Malnutrition Screening Tool, screened 360 (96%) of 377 eligible patients while nurses screened 332 (88%) patients. Student dietitians and nurses screened 119 patients (33%) and 63 patients (18%) respectively at risk of malnutrition. There was fair agreement (ⱪ = 0.311) in Malnutrition Screening Tool total scores between nurses and student dietitians. There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients screened at risk of malnutrition between nurses and student dietitians (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Malnutrition risk remains high in acute care settings. Nurses were less likely to screen patients as at risk of malnutrition than student dietitians. Regular support and training in using Malnutrition Screening Tool may help improve the rate and reliability of routine malnutrition screening.

COMmunity-Based Nutrition RISK Screening in Older Adults Living Independently (COMRISK): Feasibility, Acceptability, and Appropriateness of Community Partnership Models in Alberta, Canada.

This feasibility study of routine nutrition risk screening in community-dwelling older adults using a partnership between health care and community-based organizations (CBO) aimed to (1) evaluate the ability of community-based partnerships to provide screening for nutrition risk, and appropriately refer at-risk individuals for follow-up care and (2) determine the barriers to and facilitators of screening. Adults 65 years of age and older were screened by staff in two primary care and one CBO setting using the Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition (SCREEN)-8 nutrition risk screening tool. Screeners, organization administrators, and registered dietitians responded to surveys regarding SCREEN-8 administration, referral processes, and partnership interactions. All found the SCREEN-8 initiative feasible, acceptable, and appropriate. Sustainability requires strengthening of community resources, referral processes, and telephone assessments. The partnership added value despite limitations in communications. We conclude that broader implementation of this program using community-based partnerships has the potential to aid in the prevention of malnutrition in older adults.

Community-Based Nutrition Risk Screening in Older Adults (COMRISK): An Exploration of the Experience of Being Screened and Prevalence of Nutrition Risk in Alberta, Canada.

The objectives of this feasibility study were to measure the prevalence of nutrition risk in community-dwelling older adults (CDOA, ages ≥ 65 years) and explore the perspectives of CDOA of the acceptability, value, and effectiveness of nutrition risk screening in primary care and community settings. Using the Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition (SCREEN)© eight-item tool (n = 276), results indicated that moderate and high nutrition risks affected 50 per cent and 8 per cent, respectively, of those screened. Interviewees (n = 16) agreed that screening is acceptable, important, and valuable (Theme One). Effectiveness was unclear, as only 3 of 16 respondents recalled being told their nutrition risk status. When articulating nutrition-related issues, a food security theme, expressed in the third person, was prominent (Theme Two). Screening for nutrition risk and receiving nutrition information in community-based settings are acceptable to CDOA and medically necessary, as evidenced by the high proportion of CDOA at moderate-high nutrition risk.

Prevalence of Malnutrition in Hospitalized Patients in Lebanon Using Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS-2002) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Criteria and Its Association with Length of Stay.

(1) Background: Prevalence studies on hospital malnutrition are still scarce in the Middle East region despite recent global recognition of clinical malnutrition as a healthcare priority. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence of malnutrition in adult hospitalized patients in Lebanon using the newly developed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition tool (GLIM), and explore the association between malnutrition and the length of hospital stay (LOS) as a clinical outcome. (2) Methods: A representative cross-sectional sample of hospitalized patients was selected from a random sample of hospitals in the five districts in Lebanon. Malnutrition was screened and assessed using the Nutrition Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) and GLIM criteria. Mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MUAC) and handgrip strength were used to measure and assess muscle mass. Length of stay was recorded upon discharge. (3) Results: A total of 343 adult patients were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of malnutrition risk according to NRS-2002 was 31.2%, and the prevalence of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria was 35.6%. The most frequent malnutrition-associated criteria were weight loss and low food intake. Malnourished patients had a significantly longer LOS compared to patients with adequate nutritional status (11 days versus 4 days). Handgrip strength and MUAC measurements were negatively correlated with the length of hospital stay. (4) Conclusion and recommendations: the study documented the valid and practical use of GLIM for assessing the prevalence and magnitude of malnutrition in hospitalized patients in Lebanon, and highlighted the need for evidence-based interventions to address the underlying causes of malnutrition in Lebanese hospitals.

Factors associated with nutritional risk in patients receiving haemodialysis assessed by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002).

BACKGROUND: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 is recommended as a screening tool to identify patients at risk of undernutrition for all patients in hospitals by the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Nutritional risk is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients, and it is common among patients on haemodialysis. Factors associated with nutritional risk that could facilitate the screening/diagnostic procedures are warranted. OBJECTIVES: Identification of factors that are associated with nutritional risk in patients with end-stage renal disease treated with haemodialysis. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-centre, cross-sectional study in patients receiving haemodialysis (n = 53) were screened for nutritional risk using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Associations were made with data on dietary intake by 24-h dietary recall, and measurement of body composition, anthropometric measurements and biochemical variables. RESULTS: Nutritional risk was common among patients on haemodialysis (26%), and was associated with low energy and protein intake, and low pre-albumin concentrations also after adjustments for age and sex. Nutritional risk was neither associated with diabetes nor duration of dialysis treatment. CONCLUSION: Measurement of pre-albumin and dietary assessment using a 24-h dietary recall can support the identification of patients receiving haemodialysis at nutritional risk.

Pre-treatment Nutritional Risk Assessment by NRS-2002 Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

We investigated the predictors of survival in patients with advanced BTC according to their baseline nutritional status estimated by the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002. From September 2006 to July 2017, we reviewed the data of 601 inpatients with BTC. Data on demographic and clinical parameters was collected from electronic medical records, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the stepwise Cox regression analysis. Patients with an NRS-2002 score of ≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4 were respectively classified as "no risk," "moderate risk," "high risk." Following initial NRS-2002 score, 333 patients (55%) were classified as "no-risk," 109 patients (18%) as "moderate-risk," and 159 patients (27%) as "high-risk." Survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in the median OS: "no-risk": 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-13.7); "moderate-risk": 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.3-8.0); and "high-risk": 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.6) (p < 0.001). NRS-2002 score was an independent factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.616 for "moderate-risk", 95% CI, 1.288-2.027, p < 0.001; HR, 2.121 for "high-risk", 95% CI, 1.722-2.612, p < 0.001), along with liver metastasis, peritoneal seeding, white blood cell count, platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, cholesterol, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. In conclusion, baseline NRS-2002 is an appropriate method for discriminating those who are already malnourished and who have poor prognosis in advanced BTC patient. Significance of these results merit further validation to be integrated in the routine practice to improve quality of care in BTC patients.

Association of nutrition risk screening 2002 and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool with COVID-19 severity in hospitalized patients in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition affects normal body function and is associated with disease severity and mortality. Due to the high prevalence of malnutrition reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the current study examined the association between malnutrition and disease severity in hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 in Iran. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 203 adult patients with COVID-19 verified by real-time polymerase chain reaction test and chest computed tomography were recruited from those admitted to a university hospital in Iran. To determine COVID-19 intensity, patients were categorized into four groups. Malnutrition assessment was based on the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and nutrition risk screening score (NRS-2002). An ordinal regression model was run to assess the association between malnutrition and disease severity. RESULTS: In the studies sample of Iranian patients with COVID-19, 38.3% of patients had severe COVID-19. According to NRS-2002, 12.9% of patients were malnourished. Based on MUST, 2% of patients were at medium, and 13.4% of patients were at high risk of malnutrition. Malnutrition was associated with a higher odds of extremely severe COVID-19 according to NRS-2002 (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-2.56; P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition was not prevalent in the studies sample of Iranian patients with COVID-19; however, it was associated with a higher odds of extremely severe COVID-19.

Nutrition risk profile of 62 408 inpatients based on electronic health records in a tertiary children's hospital.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the nutrition risk profile of hospitalized children with electronic health record-based nutrition risk screening. Additionally, this study analyzed the association between high nutrition risk and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Children discharged from Shanghai Children's Medical Center between 2017 and 2018 were enrolled and nutritionally screened. Nutrition risk scores using the Screening Tool for Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), length of stay (LOS), and costs of hospitalization were recorded. Enrolled patients were categorized into two groups: the low and medium nutrition risk (LMNR) group, with scores ranging from 0 to 3, and the high nutrition risk (HNR) group, with scores ≥4. RESULTS: Out of 62 408 subjects, 17.4% were at HNR. Patients with congenital heart diseases (83.9%), hematology-oncology diseases (26.0%) and gastroenterological diseases (21.4%) were affected most. Infants had the highest HNR rates (35.5%) of any age group. Surgical patients (20.7%) had a higher rate of HNR than non-surgical patients (9.5%). The HNR group had longer LOS (10.0 d versus 3.0 d, P < 0.001), higher total hospital costs (53 680.1 Chinese yuan [CNY] versus 8810.1 CNY, P < 0.001), and higher costs of antibiotics (441.0 CNY versus 0.0 CNY, P < 0.001) compared to the LMNR group. As STAMP score values increased, growing LOS and costs of hospitalization, medications, and antibiotics were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of HNR was found in patients of Shanghai Children's Medical Center. Surgeries, specific disease, and infancy were important HNR risk factors. HNR scores using STAMP might predict prolonged LOS and higher medical costs.

Comparison of the Efficacy of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria, Subjective Global Assessment, and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 in Diagnosing Malnutrition and Predicting 5-Year Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Illnesses.

BACKGROUND: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) has developed new criteria for diagnosing patients with malnutrition. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria, Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and their association with long-term mortality in patients hospitalized for acute illnesses. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in a sample of 231 patients with different comorbidities hospitalized for acute illnesses in medical or surgical wards. Nutrition status was retrospectively assessed with GLIM criteria using patients' records at admission in addition to SGA and NRS-2002. The agreement between the tools was calculated using κ statistics, and the association of malnutrition according to each tool and mortality were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.2 ± 18.2 years, and 56.7% were women. The prevalence of malnutrition was 35.9% with GLIM criteria, 37.2% with SGA, and 38% with NRS-2002. The agreement between tools was good (GLIM-SGA, κ = 0.804; GLIM-NRS-2002, κ = 0.784). During a median follow-up period of 63.2 months, 79 deaths occurred. The sensitivity in predicting 5-year mortality was 59.49%, 58.23%, and 58.23%, and specificity was 76.32%, 73.68%, and 72.37% for GLIM criteria, SGA, and NRS-2002, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, GLIM criteria best predicted 5-year mortality (hazard ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.96-4.86; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the effectiveness of GLIM in diagnosing malnutrition and predicting all-cause mortality among patients hospitalized for acute illnesses.

Approaches to Nutritional Screening in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Malnutrition is common among severe patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), mainly elderly adults and patients with comorbidities. It is also associated with atypical presentation of the disease. Despite the possible contribution of malnutrition to the acquisition and severity of COVID-19, it is not clear which nutritional screening measures may best diagnose malnutrition in these patients at early stages. This is of crucial importance given the urgency and rapid progression of the disease in vulnerable groups. Accordingly, this review examines the available literature for different nutritional screening approaches implemented among COVID-19 patients, with a special focus on elderly adults. After a literature search, we selected and scrutinized 14 studies assessing malnutrition among COVID-19 patients. The Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) has demonstrated superior sensitivity to other traditional screening measures. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, which comprises serum albumin level, cholesterol level, and lymphocytes count, as well as a combined CONUT-lactate dehydrogenase-C-reactive protein score expressed a predictive capacity even superior to that of NRS-2002 (0.81% and 0.92% vs. 0.79%) in midlife and elder COVID-19 patients. Therefore, simple measures based on routinely conducted laboratory investigations such as the CONUT score may be timely, cheap, and valuable alternatives for identifying COVID-19 patients with high nutritional risk. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was the only measure used to detect residual malnutrition and high malnutrition risk in remitting patients-MNA scores correlated with hypoalbuminemia, hypercytokinemia, and weight loss. Older males with severe inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and pre-existing comorbidities (diabetes, obesity, or hypertension) are more prone to malnutrition and subsequently poor COVID-19 prognosis both during the acute phase and during convalescence. Thus, they are in need of frequent nutritional monitoring and support while detecting and treating malnutrition in the general public might be necessary to increase resilience against COVID-19.

Performance of CT-based low skeletal muscle index, low mean muscle attenuation, and bioelectric impedance derived low phase angle in the detection of an increased risk of nutrition related mortality.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate in a head to head comparison the performance of bioimpedance derived low phase angle (PA), CT-based low skeletal muscle index (SMI) and low mean muscle attenuation (MA), and Pandora Score (PS) to detect an increased nutrition related mortality in hospitalized patients. METHODS: A total of 7736 patients were hospitalized in Dessau community hospital (Nov 11, 2016-Feb 05, 2017). In 227/7736 patients an abdominal CT scan was obtained and low values (below threshold) of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and mean muscle attenuation (MA) were obtained at L3 level using Slice-O-Matic. In 180/227 patients, malnutrition screening (NRS-2002 ≥ 3), determination of low PA (<5th percentile) and calculation of 30-day mortality risk (PS ≥ 5%) were done within 6 days after the CT scan. RESULTS: PA was low in 116 (64%), SMI was low in 95 (53%), and MA was below threshold in 137 (77%) patients. Using hospital mortality (8.3%) as a gold standard, low SMI, low MA, or low PA showed high sensitivity (SMI 93.3%; MA 86.7%; PA 86.7%) and high negative predictive (NPV) values (SMI 98.9%; MA 95.3%; PA 96.9%) and improved specificity (NRS + SMI 65.5%; NRS + MA 50.3%; NRS + PA 50.3%) when combined with the criterion NRS ≥ 3. Using hospital mortality as a gold standard, a PS ≥ 36 (predicted mortality ≥ 5%) showed a sensitivity of 73.3%, a specificity of 62.2% and an NPV of 96.4%. PS predicted mortality was ≥5% in 70 (39%) patients and was higher (median 5.2%; IQR: 2.8; 11.8 vs 1.7%; IQR: 1.0; 2.8; p < 0.001) in patients with a low PA and this was also observed for low vs normal SMI (median 5.7%; IQR: 2.6; 11.1 vs 2.7%; IQR:1.4;5.5; p < 0.001) but not for low vs normal MA (median 3.9%; IQR: 2.1; 8.8 vs 3.4%; IQR: 2.0; 8.1; ns). CONCLUSION: Determination of phase angle < 5th percentile is a convenient non-invasive and inexpensive bedside method with high sensitivity and a high negative predictive value to detect patients at risk of nutrition related mortality with a performance comparable to CT derived skeletal muscle index or mean muscle attenuation.