Risk Factors for Dysfunctional Elbow Stiffness following Operative Fixation of Distal Humerus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Elbow stiffness is one of the most common complications after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures; however, there is relatively limited literature assessing which factors are associated with this problem. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors associated with dysfunctional elbow stiffness in distal humerus fractures after operative fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review of all distal humerus fractures that underwent operative fixation (AO/OTA 13A-C) at a single level 1 trauma center from November 2014 to October 2021. A minimum six-month follow-up was required for inclusion or the outcome of interest. Dysfunctional elbow stiffness was defined as a flexion-extension arc of less than 100° at latest follow-up or any patient requiring surgical treatment for limited elbow range of motion. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with distal humerus fractures were included in the study: 54 patients comprised the elbow stiffness group and 56 patients were in the control group. Average follow-up of 343 (59 to 2,079) days. Multiple logistic regression showed that orthogonal plate configuration (aOR: 5.70, 95% CI: 1.91-16.99, p=0.002), and longer operative time (aOR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.10, p=0.017) were independently associated with an increased odds of elbow stiffness. OTA/AO 13A type fractures were significantly associated with a decreased odds of stiffness (aOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.80, p=0.026). Among 13C fractures, olecranon osteotomy (aOR: 5.48, 95% CI: 1.08-27.73, p=0.040) was also associated with an increased odds of elbow stiffness. There were no significant differences in injury mechanism, Gustilo-Anderson classification, reduction quality, days to surgery from admission, type of fixation, as well as rates of ipsilateral upper extremity fracture, neurovascular injury, nonunion, or infection between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Dysfunctional elbow stiffness was observed in 49.1% of patients who underwent operative fixation of distal humerus fractures in the present study. Orthogonal plate configuration, olecranon osteotomy, and longer operative time were associated with an increased odds of dysfunctional elbow stiffness; however, 13A type fractures were associated with decreased odds of stiffness. Patients with these injuries should be counseled on their risk of stiffness following surgery, and modifiable risk factors like plate positioning and performing an olecranon osteotomy should be considered by surgeons.

Percent articular exposure of the distal humerus with triceps fascial tongue approach compared with olecranon osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Distal humerus fractures are common and can be difficult to treat. No one approach to the distal humerus has been shown to be superior to another; however, the olecranon osteotomy remains the gold standard for complex, intra-articular fractures. Understanding the percent of articular exposure with approaches to the distal humerus is important for success. The goal of this study is to show the percent of articular exposure of the triceps fascial tongue approach as compared with the olecranon osteotomy. METHODS: Twelve fresh frozen cadavers were separated randomly into 2 groups of 6 each. The first group of 6 specimens was allocated to the triceps fascial tongue approaches with the collaterals maintained and with the collaterals released off the ulna and elbow dislocated. The second group of 6 was allocated to the triceps fascial tongue approach while maintaining the collaterals followed by an olecranon osteotomy. The articular exposure was marked after performing each approach, and the percent of articular exposure was quantified by using 3D scanning. Standard deviations were calculated for each. RESULTS: The average percent visualization of the distal humerus articular surface in the fascial tongue approach while maintaining the collaterals was 36% in the first cohort and 37% in the second cohort with a standard deviation of 5% in both cohorts. The average percent of the distal humerus articular surface exposed in the fascial tongue approach with the collaterals released off the ulna and elbow dislocated was 85.09% with a standard deviation of 4%. The average percent of the distal humerus articular surface exposed in the olecranon osteotomy group was 57.9% with a standard deviation of 5%. CONCLUSION: The triceps fascial tongue approach allows for visualization of about one-third of the joint, which may be adequate for many intra-articular distal humerus fractures. For added exposure of the articular surface, the collaterals may be elevated from the ulna and the elbow dislocated allowing for a substantial increase in percent of articular exposure compared with the collateral retaining fascial tongue approach and the olecranon osteotomy.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between the olecranon osteotomy approach and the Bryan-Morrey approach for total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of the olecranon osteotomy approach and the Bryan-Morrey approach in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 49 patients with elbow disease were treated with TEA. A total of 22 patients with TEA by olecranon osteotomy approach were designated as group A, and 27 patients with TEA by Bryan-Morrey approach were designated as group B. There were 22 males and 27 females, aged 32-82 years with a mean age of 62 years. There were 44 cases of unilateral elbow joint, including 27 cases on the left elbow and 17 cases on the right elbow, and 5 cases of the bilateral elbow joint. There were 6 cases of osteoarthritis (7 elbows), 18 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (22 elbows), 14 cases of traumatic arthritis (14 elbows), 7 cases of distal humeral fractures (7 elbows), and 4 cases of elbow tuberculosis (4 elbows). For each group, we recorded the operative time, intraoperative bleeding, elbow flexion, extension, pronation, supination, postoperative complication rates, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score after surgery. RESULTS: Operative time and intraoperative bleeding were less in group A than in group B (53-120 min [70 (62.5, 78) min] vs. 64-105 min [77 (73, 87) min], and 10-200 ml [50 (20, 90) ml] vs. 5-250 ml [100 (50, 150) ml], P < .028). The elbow flexion, pronation activity, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were higher in group A than in group B, [(121 ± 12)° vs. (112 ± 10)°, 85 (85,85)° vs. 80 (77,85)°, and (94 ± 3) points vs. (91 ± 4) points, P < .036], while elbow extension and supination activity and complication rates were not statistically significant in either group. CONCLUSION: Compared to Bryan-Morrey approach, the olecranon osteotomy approach to TEA provides adequate visualization, saves operative time and reduces bleeding, provides better flexion activity, effectively improves elbow function, and achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Morphology of Proximal Ulna Bare Area: A Guide for Olecranon Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Olecranon osteotomy is commonly used to obtain access to the distal humerus for fracture fixation. The goal of this study was to accurately describe the anatomy of the bare area to minimize articular cartilage damage while performing olecranon osteotomies. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric ulnae were denuded to expose the bare area. Laser surface mapping was used to create 3-dimensional models, and the nonarticular portions of the ulnae were digitally measured. RESULTS: The morphology of the bare area from all aspects of the proximal ulna was defined. The central bare area was consistent in its location, 4.9 ± 1.5 mm distal to the deepest portion of the trochlear notch and 23.2 ± 2.3 mm distal to the olecranon tip. The maximum chevron osteotomy apical angle to stay within the bare area averaged 110° ± 11.8°. However, there was little tolerance for error without the risk of violating the articular cartilage. With transverse osteotomy, averaging 18° ± 10.6° in the coronal plane, there is less risk of damaging the articular cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: Transverse osteotomy perpendicular to the posterior surface of the ulna aiming at the visible bare area on the medial and lateral sides of the greater sigmoid notch may reduce the chances of violating the nonvisible articular cartilage of the proximal ulna. Based on the findings of this study, if chevron osteotomy is used, a shallow apex distal angle of more than 110° is recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides intraoperative landmarks to guide surgeons performing olecranon osteotomies to stay within the bare area.

Triceps tongue versus olecranon osteotomy for intra-articular distal humeral fractures: a matched-cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are various approaches to the distal humerus when managing a distal humeral fracture, and controversy exists regarding which approach is optimal. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of the triceps tongue (TT) approach when used for osteosynthesis of AO type 13-A, B, and C distal humeral fractures. Secondarily, we aimed to compare the outcomes of the TT approach vs. olecranon osteotomy (OO) when used for osteosynthesis of AO type 13-C distal humeral fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with distal humeral fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation by either a TT or OO approach between 2007 and 2019 at 2 separate institutions. TT patients with AO type 13-C fractures were matched to OO patients at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, and fracture characteristics. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, elbow motion, fracture union, complications, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were compared. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients treated with the TT approach were assessed, and the matched TT and OO cohorts each comprised 15 patients. The TT group showed less blood loss (119.3 mL vs. 268.5 mL, P = .03), had greater maximal flexion (126° vs. 116°, P = .03), and achieved a larger flexion-extension arc (108° vs. 93°, P = .05) than the OO group. In the OO cohort, 27% of patients had complications directly related to the OO, and OO patients had a higher rate of postoperative ulnar nerve neuritis (33% vs. 0%, P = .04). There was no difference in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .08), procedure time (P = .2), total number of patients with ≥1 complication (P = .5), difficulty with union (P = .7), or number of patients requiring revision surgery (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: The TT approach is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of distal humeral fractures. When compared with the OO approach for AO type 13-C fractures, the TT approach did not differ regarding functional outcomes but showed increased range of motion, decreased intraoperative blood loss, and a lower rate of postoperative ulnar nerve neuritis. The TT approach should be considered as a safe and reliable first-line approach for intra-articular distal humeral fractures because it allows adequate visualization of the articular surface, eliminates complications related to osteotomy including delayed union or nonunion and hardware failure or irritation, and allows for easy conversion to total elbow arthroplasty.

Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach vs. olecranon osteotomy approach: an anatomic study of cadavers.

BACKGROUND: Exposure of the articular surface is the key to successful open reduction and internal fixation treatment for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. The olecranon osteotomy approach has previously been described as one of the most effective exposure approaches. Nevertheless, this approach cannot expose the anterior trochlea, and it is impossible to reduce and fix the capitellum under direct vision. The purpose of this study was to compare the exposure of the articular surface of the distal humerus between the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach (group L) and the olecranon osteotomy approach (group O). METHODS: Each approach was performed on 8 freshly frozen upper limbs of adult cadavers. After each approach was completed, a 0.5-mm Kirschner wire is inserted along the edge to mark the visible part of the articular surface. Then, the soft tissue of each elbow is removed, and a surface-scanning system is used to create a digital 3-dimensional model. The visible part of the articular surface obtained by each surgical approach was mapped and quantified using markers created by Kirschner wires. RESULTS: The lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach and the olecranon osteotomy approach exposed 0.8 ± 0.0 and 0.6 ± 0.0 of the distal humeral articular surface (P < .001), 1.0 ± 0.0 and 0.3 ± 0.1 of the capitellum (P < .001), 0.6 ± 0.0 and 0.7 ± 0.0 of the trochlea (P < .001), 0.7 ± 0.0 and 0.5 ± 0.1 of the anterior trochlea (P < .001), and 0.5 ± 0.0 and 1.0 ± 0.0 of the posterior trochlea, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the olecranon osteotomy approach, the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach could more fully expose the total articular surface of the distal humerus, capitellum, and anterior trochlea, but the olecranon osteotomy approach could more fully expose the trochlea and posterior trochlea.

Management of type 13C2 distal humerus fractures by olecranon osteotomy approach versus triceps sparing approach-our experience with sixty cases.

BACKGROUND: Intercondylar humerus fractures (AO type 13C), though less common (less than 1%), are increasing over the last few years. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these fractures are now well recognised and preferred management. These fractures are principally approached from posterior side and various posterior approaches have been mentioned. Triceps sparing is a relatively newer approach for fixation of these fractures. Here, we are ascertaining the outcomes of triceps sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy approach and also investigating the preferred approach in various age groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A level III non-randomized retrospective comparative study was conducted with a total of 60 patients belonging to AO type 13C2 in the age group of 16-70 years, operated upon during the period of September 2013 to March 2019. They were analysed for various outcome measures and complications. MEPS and DASH were used to determine outcome. RESULTS: Out of a total of 60 patients (mean age 37.52 years), 28 were in olecranon osteotomy (OO) group and 32 were in the triceps sparing (TS) group. The mean operative time for group OO was 93.11 ± 8.78 minutes compared with group TS where it was 77 ± 4.64 minutes and the difference was statistically significant. Similarly, blood loss was 224 ± 46 ml in group OO compared with 197 ± 39 ml in group TS and it was also statistically significant. The average MEPS score was slightly better in the group TS (86.56 ± 10.66) compared with group OO (83.57 ± 10.96), though not statistically significant. Similarly, DASH score was 35.72 ± 8.35 in group TS and 35.32 ± 8.89 in group OO. The MEPS score was excellent (≥ 90) in 12 patients of group OO and 16 patients of group TS, good (75-89) in 11 patients of each group and fair (60-74) in 5 patients of each group. The patients in the age group of ≥ 60 years tend to have inferior functional outcomes, though not statistically significant, when treated with triceps sparing approach compared with olecranon osteotomy approach. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found that, compared with the olecranon osteotomy technique, better results though not statistically significant, can be expected with triceps sparing approach while treating type C2 distal humerus fractures in younger patients without significantly compromising the articular reduction or impairing stability of fracture fixation.

Digastric olecranon osteotomy a new approach to the elbow: retrospective study of 24 Coonrad-Morrey® total elbow arthroplasty at 30-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Digastric olecranon osteotomy approach allows an excellent articular exposure and preserves principal vascular supply and the continuity of the extensor apparatus. The aim of this study was to assess the early clinical and radiological outcome after total elbow arthroplasty implanted from a digastric olecranon osteotomy approach. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 22 patients (two men and twenty women) treated with 24 Coonrad-Morrey® total elbow arthroplasty implanted from a digastric olecranon osteotomy approach in Island of France (Paris, Argenteuil and Saint-Denis). The mean age was 80 years (50-96). We treated 20 fractures; according to AO classification, seven patients suffered from a C1 fracture, seven from a C3 and C2, two from malunions, and four from rheumatoid arthritis. The mean time of follow-up was 30 months (6-132). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Mayo elbow performance score. We evaluated triceps strength and radiographic healing. RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, the average flexion arc was 23° (5°-50°) to 112° (95°-130°). The Mayo elbow performance score averaged 92 points (75-100). The mean strength of the triceps in extension and flexion was, respectively, 1.9 and 4.7 kgs. All elbows were stable. A single immediate post-operative wound infection was reported and did not require any surgical revision. Radiological consolidation of the olecranon osteotomy was assessed in sixteen patients between 8 and 16 weeks. Heterotopic ossifications were noted in one elbow. One patient had an elbow dislocation by fracture of the axe's component. CONCLUSION: The early clinical and radiological outcomes are promising and support the use of digastric olecranon osteotomy for the implantation of total elbow arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study, level IV.

Outcome following olecranon osteotomy versus paratricipital approach for complex intra-articular (AO 13-C) fracture of distal humerus: a prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The paratricipital approach is a relatively new approach in a complex intra-articular fracture of distal humerus (AO13-C). The aim of this study was to ascertain this approach compared with the olecranon osteotomy approach. Also, we aimed to investigate whether advancing age and surgical delay yield a poor outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, 51 adult patients with closed AO 13-C-type fractures were included in the study and divided into 2 groups, that is, paratricipital approach (PT) group and olecranon osteotomy (OO) group. Patients were treated by 2 senior trauma surgeons. They were prospectively analyzed for outcome and complications. Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) was used to evaluate the outcome. RESULTS: Of the total 51 patients (mean age, 41.6 years), 27 patients were in the PT group and 24 in the OO group. There was no difference in arc of motion (P = .513) and MEPS (P = .127) as well as complication rate (χ2 statistic = 0.36, P = .54). However, specifically in the type C3 fracture, the PT group had a poor outcome for arc of motion (P = .002) and MEPS (P = .019) compared with the OO group. Also, age and surgical delay had a weak, negative correlation with arc of motion and MEPS. The association between age and surgical delay against arc of motion was statistically significant (P = .005 and .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The PT approach and the OO approach can be used alternatively for AO 13-C1 and -C2 fractures with similar outcomes. However, in type C3, the PT approach yields a poor outcome in comparison with the OO approach.

Lateral Para-Olecranon Approach for the Treatment of Distal Humeral Fracture.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of the lateral para-olecranon triceps-splitting approach for the treatment of distal humeral fracture. METHODS: Ten patients (3 males, 7 females) with a mean age of 59 years were retrospectively reviewed. There were 2 A2, 3 C1, and 5 C2 fractures according to the AO/ASIF classification. Types B3 and C3 fractures were excluded from this study because the olecranon osteotomy approach was indicated to visualize the anterior fragment. The triceps was split at the midline, and the anconeus muscle was incised from the proximal ulna. The lateral half of the triceps along with anconeus was retracted laterally as a single unit. The distal part of the humerus could be visualized from medial and lateral windows by retracting the medial half of the triceps. The articular fragment was anatomically reduced and fixed temporarily with a Kirschner wire, and the reconstructed distal articular block was then fixed to the humeral shaft with double locking plates. RESULTS: After surgery, average elbow flexion was 127° (range, 110°-145°), and extension was -10° (range, -20°-0°) at the average follow-up time of 12.4 months (range, 8‒20 months). Seven patients had normal muscle strength against full resistance (manual muscle testing grade 5), and the other 3 patients had slightly reduced muscle strength (grade 4). No articular stepoffs of more than 1 mm were seen on postoperative radiographs. There were no cases of triceps insufficiency and nonunion. The average (± SD) Mayo Elbow Score was 93.5 ± 5.8 points at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral para-olecranon approach is useful for the management of selected fractures of the distal humerus, preserving extension strength and providing satisfactory clinical outcomes, with no risk of olecranon osteotomy-related complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Triceps-sparing extra-articular step-cut olecranon osteotomy for distal humeral fractures: an anatomic study.

BACKGROUND: This anatomic study investigated the distal humeral articular surface exposure achievable through a triceps-sparing oblique extra-articular osteotomy of the olecranon with a step-cut modification compared with the anconeus flap transolecranon apex distal chevron osteotomy. In addition, the bone contact surface areas of the osteotomized surfaces after transolecranon and extra-articular osteotomies were compared. METHODS: Seven pairs of fresh adult cadaveric elbow joints were examined. Each of the right elbows underwent triceps-sparing extra-articular step-cut olecranon osteotomy (SCOOT) with an anconeus flap, and the left elbows underwent the anconeus flap transolecranon apex distal chevron osteotomies (CO). The articular surface exposed by each of the osteotomy techniques was then digitally analyzed using a 3-dimensional measurement system. The bone contact surface area of the osteotomized surfaces was also assessed. RESULTS: The percentage of total joint exposed by the SCOOT group was less than the CO group (SCOOT: 64% ± 3% vs. CO: 73% ± 3%; P = .002). There was significantly greater bone contact surface area of the osteotomized surfaces in the SCOOT group compared with the CO group (SCOOT: 1172 ± 251 mm2 vs. CO: 457 ± 133 mm2; P = .002). CONCLUSION: The triceps SCOOT procedure with an anconeus flap provides excellent distal humeral articular surface exposure with the added benefit of a substantially increased (2.6-times) bone contact surface area of the osteotomized surfaces.

Functional outcome following olecranon osteotomy approach for fixation of T/Y fractures of distal humerus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional outcome of fixation of T/Y fracture distal humerus through olecranon osteotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi experimental study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Orthopedics, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi from June 2011 to December 2011. METHODOLOGY: Patients of either sex presenting with T/Y(configuration) fracture Humerus of Risenborough-Radin type II-IV and less than three weeks duration were included. Diagnosis was made by X-rays and underwent fixation by posterior approach through olecranon osteotomy. Functional outcome was measured by using Risenborough-Radin criteria of range of motion as good, fair and poor. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 13. RESULTS: 71 patients aged between 20-50 years were enrolled. Mean duration of trauma was 12.2±4.4 days. Majority 55 (77.5%) had type III fracture. Patients less than 40 years had good outcome in 52.8% cases and fair outcome in 41.7% cases better than patients more than 40 years age. In females, outcome was 68.8% which was better than males. Trauma of less than 12 days of duration had good outcome in 60.5% of cases. Type II fracture had better outcome than other types. Overall, 39 patients (54.9%) had good outcome, fair outcome in (33.80%) 24 patients and poor outcome in (11.27%) 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior approach using Transolecranon osteotomy is a satisfactory procedure for fixation of T/Y fracture of distal humerus, because it achieves good functional outcome post operatively in terms of range of motion of elbow compared to other procedures.

A comparison of functional outcome of intercondylar fracture of distal humerus managed by olecranon osteotomy approach versus triceps sparing approach in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of satisfactory functional outcome of intercondylar fractures of distal humerus managed by the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy approach. METHODS: The randomised controlled study was conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from September 1, 2012 to August31 2014,and comprised patients> 14 years of age who were admitted through the Accident and Emergency Department and were prepared for surgery to repair intercondylar fractures of distal humerus. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Implants were arranged preoperatively. Patients in group A were managed by open reduction internal fixationvia olecranon osteotomy approach, and those in group B were managed by open reduction internal fixationvia triceps-sparing approach by the same team of surgeons. Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to assess the functional outcome. Demographic, preoperative and postoperative clinical information of all patients were entered into a predesigned proforma and variables were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: The 150 patients in the study were randomly divided into two groups of 75(50%) patients each. The overall mean age was 49.01±14.63 years. Mean age of group A patients was 53.84±11.86 years and that of group B was 44.19±15.59 years. In group A, there were 67(89.3%) patients who had satisfactory functional outcome and 8(10.7%) had unsatisfactory outcome. In groupB,53(70.7%) patients had satisfactory and 22(29.3%) patients had unsatisfactory functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Olecranonosteotomy approach was found to be more effective and preferable compared to the triceps-sparing approach.

Techniques and Fixation of Olecranon Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: We aimed to characterize the incidence of complications regarding olecranon osteotomy, looking more specifically at the type of osteotomy and the fixation construct used to repair the osteotomy. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed. A study was included if it was an adult clinical study, a transverse or chevron olecranon osteotomy was performed, and the study explicitly states the fixation construct used to repair the osteotomy. A quality assessment was performed in each study prior to data extraction. Results: We included 39 studies with a total of 1,445 patients. Most studies included patients who were being treated primarily for a distal humerus fracture. The overall incidence of delayed union was 27/643 (4.2%), with a higher rate in transverse osteotomy than in chevron osteotomy (5/49 (10.2%) vs 22/595 (3.7%)). Nonunion occurred in 43/811 (5.4%) of patients, with a higher rate in transverse osteotomy (6/73 (8.2%) vs. 37/712 (5.2%)). Implant failure or loss of reduction occurred in 44/746 (5.9%) of patients, with a higher rate in transverse osteotomy (11/49 (22.4%) vs 33/688 (4.8%)). The removal of implants occurred in 236/1078 (21.9%) of all patients, with the highest rate in those studies that used plate fixation 44/99 (44.4%). Conclusions: Compared with chevron osteotomy, patients who underwent transverse osteotomy had a higher incidence of delayed union, nonunion, and implant failure or loss of reduction requiring revision surgery. The incidence of implant removal indicates that patients should be informed that nearly half of the osteotomy fixed with a plate was removed after implantation. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

[Olecranon osteotomy approach for Dubberley type â ¢ coronal fractures of the distal humerus].

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy of olecranon osteotomy approach in the treatment of Dubberley type Ⅲ coronal fractures of the distal humerus and summarize the treatment experience. METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2020, 17 patients (5 males and 12 females) with Dubberley type Ⅲ coronal fractures of the distal humerus were treated by olecranon osteotomy approach. The age ranged from 37 to78 years old with an average of (58.5±12.9) years old. According to Dubberley classification, there were 5 cases of type Ⅲ A and 12 cases of type Ⅲ B. The curative effect was evaluated using the Borberg-Morrey elbow function score. The flexion, extension and rotation range of motion of the elbow joint, complications and postoperative imaging evaluation were recorded. RESULTS: All the 17 patients got bony union. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 33 months with an average of (15.6±5.6) months. There was 1 case of ischemic necrosis of capitulum humeri, 2 cases of traumatic arthritis and 1 case of heterotopic ossification, 1 case of malunion of fracture. The range of motion was (114.80±19.50) °. The Broberg-Morrey score was 85.3±8.2, excellent in 5 cases, good in 9 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 0 case. CONCLUSION: Through olecranon osteotomy approach, the articular surface of distal humerus could be fully exposed, and the operation is convenient. Anatomical reduction and rigid fixation of the articular surface of distal humerus are the key factors for the succesful outcome.

Plate vs. intramedullary screw fixation of chevron olecranon osteotomies: a biomechanical study.

Background: Intra-articular distal humerus fractures frequently require olecranon osteotomies for adequate exposure, but fixation of olecranon osteotomies is associated with high rates of hardware-related complications requiring subsequent reoperation for removal. Intramedullary screw fixation is an attractive option to attempt to minimize hardware prominence. The purpose of this biomechanical study is to directly compare intramedullary screw fixation (IMSF) with plate fixation (PF) of chevron olecranon osteotomies. It was hypothesized that PF would be biomechanically superior to IMSF. Methods: Chevron olecranon osteotomies of 12 matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were repaired with either precontoured proximal ulna locking plates or cannulated screws with a washer. Displacement and amplitude of displacement at the dorsal and medial aspects of the osteotomies under cyclic loading conditions were measured. Finally, the specimens were loaded to failure. Results: The IMSF group had significantly greater medial displacement (P = .034) and dorsal amplitude (P = .029) than the PF group. Medial displacement was negatively correlated with bone mineral density in the IMSF group (r = -0.66, P = .035) but not in the PF group (r = .160, P = .64). Mean load to failure between groups, however, was not statistically significant (P = .183). Conclusions: While there was no statistically significant difference in the load to failure between the two groups, IMSF repair resulted in significantly greater displacement of the medial osteotomy site during cyclic loading and greater amplitude of displacement dorsally with loading force. Decreased bone mineral density was associated with an increased displacement of the medial repair site. These results suggest that IMSF of olecranon osteotomies may result in increased fracture site displacement when compared to PF; this displacement may be greater in patients with poor bone quality.

Surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar approach without olecranon osteotomy versus olecranon osteotomy in type AO 13C3 distal humeral fracture: a matched-cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Our experience with the surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar (SFDB) approach for type AO 13C3 humeral fractures indicates that this surgical approach can be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the SFDB approach without olecranon osteotomy (OO) for type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 65 cases of type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures treated between April 2008 and July 2018; 33 patients were treated with the SFDB approach, and the remaining were treated with OO. Propensity score matching was used to control for sex, age, and the American Society of Anesthesiology score. Elbow pain, range of motion, stability, and function were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Clinical complications, reoperation rates, and radiographic results were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in the SFDB group than in the OO group (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative MEPI did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.628). According to Morrey's criteria, a typical functional range of elbow motion was achieved in 12 and 15 patients in the SFDB and OO groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SFDB approach achieves superior exposure of the articular surface without injury to the extensor mechanism in type 13C3 articular surface fracture treatment. This approach also results in good early functional recovery and clinical outcomes, with a low risk of complications.

Elbow dislocation approach for complex elbow fractures: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Approach need to be considered when surgeons dealt with complex elbow injuries and the choice of the approach is a challenge for surgeons due to the complex anatomy. On the basis of releasing the lateral collateral ligament, we modified the dislocation technique to pursue the superior exposure including not only the distal humeral surface but also the anterior facet of the coronoid process. METHODS: A total of 4 cadaver specimens and 8 elbows were included in the study. Each cadaver provided one elbow for either the elbow dislocation approach or the posterior olecranon approach. The exposed distal articular surface of humerus, humeral capitulum, humeral trochlea, anterior trochlea of distal humerus, posterior trochlea of distal humerus and the ulnar coronoid process surface were marked by image J software and calculated for a comparison for each surgical approach. RESULTS: The total distal humeral surface was exposed as a median of 98.2 (97.6, 99.6)% and 62.0 (58.3, 64.5)% for the elbow dislocation approach and the olecranon osteotomy approach (P < 0.001), the capitulum 100% and 32.4 (28.0, 39.2)% (P < 0.001), the trochlea 93.2(90.1, 96.9)% and 72.5 (65.2, 78.8)% (P < 0.001), the anterior trochlear articular surface 96.0(93.0, 97.4)% and 50.3 (43.6, 59.1)% (P < 0.001), the posterior trochlear articular surface 95.4 (93, 100)% and 100% (P = 0.76) and the articular surface of the coronoid process of ulna 71.3 (66.0, 74.2)% and 0% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For complex elbow fractures, the technique of elbow dislocation provides complete exposure of the distal humerus surface and a significant portion of the coronoid process surface, facilitating direct visualization for reduction and fixation. Level of evidence Anatomy Study; Cadaver Dissection.

[Effectiveness of total elbow arthroplasty via olecranon osteotomy approach].

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) via olecranon osteotomy approach. Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2021, 22 patients (25 sides) with elbow joint disease were treated with TEA via olecranon osteotomy approach. There were 9 males and 13 females with an average age of 52.0 years (range, 32-80 years). The disease involved unilateral elbow joint in 19 cases, including 12 cases on the left side and 7 cases on the right side, and 3 cases with bilateral elbow joints. There were 3 cases (3 sides) of osteoarthritis, 7 cases (9 sides) of rheumatoid arthritis, 6 cases (7 sides) of traumatic arthritis, 4 cases (4 sides) of distal humeral fracture, and 2 cases (2 sides) of elbow tuberculosis. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate the elbow joint function, and imaging was used to review the position of the prosthesis and the healing of the osteotomy. Results: The operation time ranged from 53 to 120 minutes (mean, 90.6 minutes); intraoperative blood loss ranged from 10 to 200 mL (mean, 68.4 mL). All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3.9-126.7 months, with a median time of 47.6 months. At last follow-up, the MEPS scores of 22 patients ranged from 72 to 100 (mean, 91.6); the elbow joint function was rated as excellent in 17 sides, good in 7 sides, and fair in 1 side, with an excellent and good rate of 96%. Elbow joint ROM was 98°-140° in flexion (mean, 119.7°), 5°-23° in extension (mean, 13.9°), 70°-90° in anterior rotation (mean, 83.3°), and 63°-90° in posterior rotation (mean, 79.4°). The follow-up time of 17 patients (20 sides) without fracture and joint stiffness before operation was 3.9-126.7 months, with a median time of 53.9 months; at last follow-up, the MEPS score and the elbow joint ROM were significantly better than those before operation ( P<0.05). The follow-up time of 5 patients (5 sides) with fracture and joint stiffness before operation was 12.0-124.2 months, with a median time of 40.1 months. At last follow-up, MEPS scores ranged from 89 to 100 (mean, 91.2), and elbow joint ROM restored. Two cases (2 sides) developed ulnar nerve symptoms after operation, and 1 case (1 side) suffered from periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic infection after revision, and the elbow prosthesis was removed. The prosthesis survival rate was 96%. During follow-up, no prosthesis loosening occurred. Conclusion: The intraoperative visual field exposure of TEA via the olecranon osteotomy approach is sufficient, which can reduce the incidence of complications such as triceps weakness and ulnar nerve injury, effectively improve the function of the elbow joint, and obtain satisfactory effectiveness.

Olecranon Osteotomy by a Gigli Saw versus Chevron's Osteotomy for Exposure of Intra-articular Distal Humerus: A Comparative Study.

Introduction: Olecranon osteotomy is employed for the fixation of intraarticular distal humeral fractures. We conducted a prospective, randomised study comparing Chevron's osteotomy with olecranon osteotomy by a Gigli saw for exposure of the intraarticular distal humerus in terms of functional outcome and intra-operative ease of the surgery. Materials and methods: Thirty patients with skeletally mature AO/OTA type 13- B and 13-C distal humerus fractures were randomly allocated to Chevron's or Gigli saw groups. Each group consisted of a total of 15 patients. Both the groups were assessed on post-operative parameters including arm, shoulder or hand pain, ability to perform certain routine activities, tingling sensations and pain while sleeping. Results: In the Gigli saw group, 12 patients had no gross limitation of activity and 13 were able to perform moderate activities with ease. Similar results were observed in the Chevron's group. The mean difference between the two groups in Oxford Score was 0.60, within the 95% confidence interval and in line with QuickDASH-11 Score. Conclusion: Chevron's technique offers stability and better healing, providing a larger surface area for bone union. However, it is challenging and time-consuming. Also, literature suggests that the Gigli saw has multiple benefits, saves time and effort, and heals by switching blood supply from centrifugal to centripetal post-operatively. Our study suggests that both Chevron's technique and the use of the Gigli saw are effective in distal humeral intra-articular fractures as assessed by multiple parameters. Hence both techniques can be equally used depending on the surgeon's preference.