Adrenalectomy Outcome Variations Across Different Functional Adrenal Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenalectomy generally has favorable outcomes. It is unknown if patients with functional adrenal tumors experience different clinical outcomes than those with benign adrenal tumors, due to the presence of comorbid conditions secondary to the functional tumor. We investigated outcomes following open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign nonfunctional (BNF) versus functional adrenal masses. METHODS: Patients undergoing adrenalectomy were identified in the 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, then categorized as BNF, hyperaldosteronism, hypercortisolism, and pheochromocytoma. The primary outcome of interest was 30-d morbidity and secondary outcomes included 30-d mortality, 30-d readmission, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Subgroup analysis was performed based upon surgical approach. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by multivariable logistic regression for individual outcomes that differed significantly between patients with BNF and functional neoplasm, factoring in patient demographics and operative approach with statistical significance on univariate analysis. Descriptive statistics and outcomes were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. RESULTS: There were 3291 patients with BNF while 484 had hyperaldosteronism, 263 hypercortisolism, and 46 pheochromocytomas. Within the laparoscopic group of 3615 (88.5%) of adrenalectomy patients, compared to BNF patients, patients with hyperaldosteronism had lower rates of postoperative morbidity (1.9% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001) and shorter LOS (1 d, interquartile range (IQR) [1-1] versus 1d IQR [1-2], P = 0.003); these persisted on multivariate analysis (OR 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.74 and odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.60, P < 0.001). Patients with hypercortisolism had higher morbidity (7.3% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001), 30-d readmission rates (5.3% versus 2.9%, P = 0.042) and longer LOS (2d, IQR [1-3] versus 1d, IQR [1-2, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, presence of hypercortisolism was independently associated with increased likelihood of readmission within 30 d (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.11-2.99, P = 0.012) and longer LOS (>1 d) (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.33-2.40, P < 0.001). Compared to BNF patients, patients with pheochromocytoma had higher rates of postoperative morbidity (6.2% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001). Within the open group of 469 (11.5% of adrenalectomy patients), there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between patients with BNF and functional adrenal masses. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after adrenalectomy performed for functional neoplasms differ based on surgical indication.

Is transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma really more challenging? A propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery is the gold standard treatment for adrenal masses, but it may be a challenging procedure in the case of pheochromocytoma (PHEO). The aim of the present study is to report the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TLA) in cases of PHEO in comparison to other types of adrenal lesions. METHODS: From 1994 to 2021, 629 patients underwent adrenalectomy. Twenty-two and thirty-five patients, respectively, were excluded because they underwent bilateral and open adrenalectomy, leaving 572 patients for inclusion. Of these, 114 patients had PHEO (Group A), and 458 had other types of lesions (Group B). To adjust for potential baseline confounders, a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted. RESULTS: After PSM, 114 matched pairs of patients were identified from each group. Statistically significant differences were not observed when comparing the median operative time (85 and 90 min in Groups A and B, respectively, p = 0.627), conversion rate [6 (5.3%) in each group, p = 1.000], transfusion rate [4 (3.5%) and 3 (2.6%) in Groups A and B, respectively, p = 1.000], complication rate [7 (6.1%) and 9 (7.9%) in Groups A and B, respectively, p = 0.796), median postoperative hospital stay (3.9 and 3.6 days in Groups A and B, respectively, p = 0.110), and mortality rate [1 (0.9%) in each group, p = 1.000]. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, the results of TLA for PHEO are equivalent to those of TLA for other types of adrenal lesions, but the fundamental requirements are multidisciplinary patient management and adequate surgeon experience. Further prospective studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.

Minimally invasive versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: the keys surgical factors influencing the outcomes-a collective overview.

PURPOSE: Adrenocortical carcinoma (A.C.C.) is a rare tumour, often discovered at an advanced stage and associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery is the treatment of choice. We aimed to review the different surgical approaches trying to compare their outcome. METHODS: This comprehensive review has been carried out according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Among all studies identified, 18 were selected for the review. A total of 14,600 patients were included in the studies, of whom 4421 were treated by mini-invasive surgery (M.I.S.). Ten studies reported 531 conversions from M.I.S. to an open approach (OA) (12%). Differences were reported for operative times as well as for postoperative complications more often in favour of OA, whereas differences for hospitalization time in favour of M.I.S. Some studies showed an R0 resection rate from 77 to 89% for A.C.C. treated by OA and 67 to 85% for tumours treated by M.I.S. The overall recurrence rate ranged from 24 to 29% for A.C.C. treated by OA and from 26 to 36% for tumours treated by M.I.S. CONCLUSIONS: OA should still be considered the standard surgical management of A.C.C. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has shown shorter hospital stays and faster recovery compared to open surgery. However, the laparoscopic approach resulted in the worst recurrence rate, time to recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in stages I-III ACC. The robotic approach had similar complications rate and hospital stays, but there are still scarce results about oncologic follow-up.

Cancer risk in adrenalectomy: are adrenal lesions equal or more than 4 cm a contraindication for laparoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Some authors consider adrenal lesions size of less than 4 cm as a positive cut-off limit to set the indications for minimally invasive surgery due to a lower risk of malignancy. Aim of this study is to report the risk of cancer for adrenal lesions measuring 4 cm or more in diameter, assessed as benign at preoperative workup (primary outcome), and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in these cases (secondary outcome). METHODS: From January 1994 to February 2019, 579 patients underwent adrenalectomy. Fifty patients with a preoperative diagnosis of primary adrenal cancer or metastases were excluded. The remaining 529 patients were included and divided in five subgroups based on adrenal lesion size at definitive histology: group A, 4-5.9 cm (137 patients); group B, 6-7.9 cm (64 patients); group C, 8-9.9 cm (13 patients); group D, ≥ 10 cm (11 patients); group E, < 4 cm (304 patients). Each group was further divided based on diagnosis of benign or malignant lesions at definitive histology. RESULTS: Four (2.9%) malignant lesions were observed in group A, 5 (7.8%) in group B, 2 (15.4%) in Groups C and D (18.2%) and 13 (4.3%) in Group E. Comparing the cancer risk among the groups, no statistically significant differences were observed. Operative time increased with increasing lesion size. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between benign and malignant lesions in each group comparing operative time, conversion and complication rates, postoperative hospital stay and mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal lesions measuring 4 cm or more in diameter are not a contraindication for LA neither in terms of cancer risk nor of conversion and morbidity rates, even if the operative time increases with increasing adrenal lesion diameter. Further prospective studies with a larger number of patients are required to draw definitive conclusions.

A case of a borderline adrenal oncocytoma in a 62-year old female.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenal oncocytomas are a rare pathology and only about 160 cases have been reported in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the case of a 62-year old female with an incidentaloma found in the right adrenal gland on a CT scan. Endocrine testing showed a non-secreting lesion. An MRI was performed to get a more precise diagnosis. It excluded a simple adenoma and a malignant tumor had to be suspected. Open adrenalectomy was performed, and pathology results confirmed a borderline adrenal oncocytoma. DISCUSSION: Oncocytomas are usually found in the kidneys, salivary glands, parathyroid, lung, pituitary gland, and ovaries. It is important to differentiate them from, for example, pheochromocytomas, adrenal cortical carcinoma, and metastasis. Most oncocytomas are non-functioning (17% are functional). Usually, they are found as incidentalomas on a CT or MRI scan. The only way to confirm the diagnosis at present is pathological examination. Bisceglia and his colleagues have proposed a new system to classify adrenal oncocytomas. The presence of one major criterion indicates malignancy, the presence of one to four minor criteria is indicative of uncertain potential. The absence of all major and minor criteria indicates benign behavior. Treatment options are open surgery, laparoscopic surgery and rarely robotic surgery. CONCLUSION: An adrenal oncocytoma remains a rare diagnosis and has a wide array of differential diagnosis. It should be treated by surgical removal and a close follow up is suggested. More research should be done regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours: Technical considerations and surgical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Giant adrenal tumours are tumours with size ≥6 cm. These are rare cancer associated with malignancy in 25% of cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to our high-volume centre of Careggi University Hospital with a giant adrenal tumour and submitted to adrenalectomy between January 2008 and December 2018. The group of patients who underwent to laparoscopic adrenalectomy was compared with a group of patients that was submitted to open adrenalectomy. RESULTS: In the past 10 years, we performed about 245 adrenalectomies for benign and malignant adrenal tumours. Fifty (20.4%) of these were giant tumours. The medium size was 9.9 cm (7-22 cm). The mean age was 57 years (21-81 years). Thirty-four (68%) of these cancers were laparoscopically removed and 16 (32%) with an open approach. The surgical outcomes in these patients were optimal if compared to the group of patients submitted to open approach in terms of good pain control, hospital stay, mean operative time and bloodless. No difference was observed about post-operative complications in the two groups. The follow-up after 30 months for malignant tumours did not show local recurrences. CONCLUSION: Our results pinpoint the advantages of performing a laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours. The tumour size is only a predictive parameter of possible malignancy, and the laparoscopic approach is a safe and feasible method in terms of surgical and oncological, only if performed by expert surgeons and in high-volume centres.

Comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) is safe and effective for the treatment of large pheochromocytoma (PHEO). This retrospective study aimed to identify the advantages and disadvantages of RLA compared to open adrenalectomy (OA). METHODS: This study included 147 patients who underwent RLA (n = 101) or OA (n = 46) for PHEO larger than 5 cm. Groups were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM) into 46 pairs. Perioperative variables and long-term follow-up results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: After PSM, patients in the RLA group had a shorter operative time (218 vs. 245 min, P = 0.040), quicker bowel recovery (2 vs. 3 days, P = 0.046), and a shorter hospital stay (8 vs. 9 days, P = 0.010) compared to the OA group. The results of multiple linear regression analyses showed that the operative method (OA vs. RLA) had an influence on the above three postoperative variables (ß = 31.84, P = 0.046; ß = 0.76, P = 0.044; and ß = 1.25, P = 0.025, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with improved blood pressure (82.61% vs. 69.57%, P = 0.143) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both RLA and OA provide similar perioperative and long-term outcomes for the surgical management of large PHEO. RLA is an efficacious and safe surgical method for patients with PHEO larger than 5 cm in diameter.

Primary Right Adrenal Teratoma in a Postmenopausal Female: a Case Report and Review of Literature.

Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors with structural components from all three cellular lineages are called teratomas. We report a rare case of a primary right adrenal teratoma in a postmenopausal female, presenting with abdominal pain. Ultrasound revealed a complex cystic shadow in the perihepatic region superior to the upper pole of the right kidney, which was suggestive of a complex supra-renal space-sequence-occupying lesion. Computerized tomography revealed a large-sized mature single multilobulated complex cystic lesion in the right hypochondrial lumbar region arising from the right adrenal gland. A right-sided transperitoneal adrenalectomy was performed. The resected mass (18 × 13 × 10 cm) was well encapsulated. Cut surfaces showed cystic mass filled with necrotic gray-white pultaceous material, along with a solid white gelatinous area. Microscopic sections showed a tumor which displayed differentiation along various tissue lineages. After immunohistochemical examinations, the tumor was confirmed to be a mature cystic teratoma. Mature teratomas show a good prognosis, and surgical resection and follow-up remain the standard approach.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Although the existing literature suggests that laparoscopic adrenalectomy may be associated with less postoperative morbidity than open adrenalectomy, a comparison of the two approaches has not been published using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) data. The objective of our analysis was to compare the 30-d outcomes after laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy using this data source. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP Participant User Files for 2005-2010 were used for this retrospective analysis, which included all patients with (1) a primary Current Procedural Terminology code for open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy and (2) a postoperative International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for adrenal gland pathology. Primary outcomes were 30-d postoperative mortality, overall complication rate, and length of postoperative hospitalization. The association between surgical approach and primary outcomes were determined after adjusting for a comprehensive array of patient- and procedure-related factors. RESULTS: A total of 3100 patients were included for analysis (644 undergoing open versus 2456 undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy). Patients undergoing a laparoscopic procedure had significantly lower postoperative morbidity and shorter length of stay than patients undergoing an open procedure after adjustment for patient- and procedure-related factors. Similar findings were demonstrated for all indications, including malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study represents the largest comparison to date of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy. Our findings suggest that the laparoscopic approach is associated with sizeable reductions in postoperative morbidity and length of postoperative hospitalization.

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Different Surgical Methods for Giant Adrenal Tumors (≥10 cm): A Single-Center Study of 44 Cases.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of open adrenalectomy (OA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) by summarizing the clinical features and treatment experience of giant adrenal tumors. Methods: The clinical data of 44 patients with adrenal tumors ≥10 cm admitted to the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2006 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean tumor diameter was 11.6 ± 1.8 cm. Regular follow-up was performed to observe the outcome of symptoms and the recurrence after operation. Results: All the 44 patients successfully completed the operation and were divided into the OA group (21 cases) and the LA group (11 cases of transabdominal laparoscopic adrenalectomy [TLA] and 12 cases of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy [RLA]) according to different operation methods. The analysis results showed that the proportion of estimated blood loss (EBL) >100 mL and the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) in the LA group were superior to those in the OA group, and there were no significant differences in other surgical indicators (P > .05); subgroup analysis was conducted for patients in the LA group according to different surgical pathways, and the results showed that there were no significant differences in each surgical indicator between TLA and RLA (P > .05). Among the 44 patients, 15 (34.1%) had intraoperative complications, 19 (43.2%) had postoperative complications, and 5 (21.7%) were converted from LA to OA. The median follow-up time was 68 (5-162) months. Conclusions: For adrenal tumors with diameter ≥10 cm, both LA and OA have relatively large damage to the patients, and the incidence of conversion to open surgery is also high. However, LA is superior to OA in EBL and PLOS. Given the fact that giant adrenal tumors are mainly pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma and have an increased possibility of malignancy, we suggest that the relationship between tumors and peripheral important blood vessels and organs should be carefully evaluated before operation, and the operative methods should be selected according to the experience of the surgeon.

Predictive Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy to Open Surgery: A 9-Year Review of 911 Cases.

Background: With the development of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard for the treatment of adrenal surgical diseases, but conversion to open adrenalectomy (OA) is also necessary in some cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for conversion from LA to OA. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 911 patients who were diagnosed with adrenal tumors and underwent LA in the Department of Urology, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2013 to December 2021. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into the laparoscopic group (n = 873) and the conversion group (n = 38). Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors of conversion, and the logistic regression equation was established to predict the probability of conversion. Results: In this study, 38 patients (4.17%) were converted to open. In the univariate analysis, body mass index (P = .037), tumor side (P < .001), tumor size (P < .001), surgical approach (P < .001), and histological type (P = .006) were significantly associated with conversion. In the multivariate analysis, tumor diameter >7 cm (odds ratio = 2.835, 95% confidence interval 1.096-7.335; P = .032), transabdominal approach (odds ratio = 2.400, 95% confidence interval 1.136-5.074; P = .022), pheochromocytoma (odds ratio = 5.018, 95% confidence interval 1.964-12.822; P = .001), and malignant tumor (odds ratio = 17.781, 95% confidence interval 4.156-76.075; P < .001) were independent risk factors for transition opening. The logistic regression equation showed good power to predict conversion. Conclusion: Tumor size, surgical approach, and histological type were predictive factors for conversion from a laparoscopic to an open procedure. Preoperative evaluation of these characteristics is of great value for clinicians to evaluate the risk of conversion and make a surgical plan. It can not only reduce the conversion rate but also help to improve the intraoperative situation and shorten the length of hospital stays.

Giant adrenal pseudocyst removed using robot-assisted surgery.

Introduction: Adrenal cysts are relatively rare and often asymptomatic. Surgical treatment is indicated for symptomatic cases with cysts >6 cm, suspected bleeding, and those that cannot be distinguished from malignant illness based on imaging findings. There have often been cases of giant cysts that were difficult to treat using laparoscopic surgery. Case presentation: A 39-year-old woman presented with fever and upper abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 95 × 80-mm left adrenal cyst. As malignant disease could not be ruled out, and the patient was symptomatic, we opted for robot-assisted left adrenalectomy. The pathological findings indicated an adrenal pseudocyst. Conclusions: This is the second report of the successful robot-assisted removal of a giant adrenal cyst.

When a Multidisciplinary Approach Is Life-Saving: A Case Report of Cardiogenic Shock Induced by a Large Pheochromocytoma.

BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytoma is known for its instantaneous presentation, especially in the younger population. Hemodynamic instability may be the cause of severe complications and impede patients' ability to undergo surgical treatment. These tumours are surgically difficult to treat due to the risk of catecholamine release during their manipulations, and when they are large, the tumour size represents an additional challenge. In our report, cardiogenic shock developed due to increases in systemic vascular resistance, and the lesion's size induced surgeons to perform open surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old female patient was admitted to our intensive care unit with hypertension and later cardiogenic shock. Systolic dysfunction was noted, along with severely increased systemic vascular resistance. A CT scan showed a left-sided 8.5 cm adrenal mass, which was confirmed as pheochromocytoma using meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Anaesthesiologists and the surgical team planned an effective strategy of treatment. Given the lesion's size and its apparent invasion of the neighbouring organs, open adrenalectomy (after prolonged hemodynamic stabilisation) was considered safer. The surgery was successful, and the patient remains free from disease two years after the initial event. CONCLUSIONS: Large pheochromocytoma can be safely and effectively treated with open surgery by experienced hands but only by seeking to reach hemodynamic stabilisation and minimising the release of catecholamine before and during surgery.

Surgical treatment of large pheochromocytoma (>6 cm): A 10-year single-center experience.

Objective: Clinical practice guidelines recommend open adrenalectomy (OA) for large pheochromocytoma (LPCC) > 6 cm in size. Although laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for the treatment of LPCC has been reported, its role remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LA and OA, and summary the surgical treatment experience. Methods: Data concerning LPCC, from January 2010 to June 2019 of a single institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Altogether 82 patients with a tumor larger than 6 cm were included (52 patients in LA group and 30 patients in OA group). Groups were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM) into 15 pairs. Patients' demographics, preoperative characteristics, and prognosis were analyzed. Results: Before PSM, the OA group had larger tumor sizes (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 8.9 [7.3-10.3] vs. 7.2 [6.7-8.0] cm; p=0.000) and higher vanillylmandelic acid level (median [IQR]: 114.3 [67.8-326.4] vs. 66.6 [37.8-145.8] µmol/24 h; p =0.004) and needed a higher cumulative dose of prazosin (median [IQR]: 83.5 [37.0-154.0] vs. 38.0 [21.0-81.0] mg; p=0.028). After PSM, the baseline data showed no significant differences between both groups. The LA group had relatively more stable blood pressure in surgery, with a lower fluctuation of systolic blood pressure (mean±standard deviation [SD]: 70.9±25.1 vs. 107.4±46.2 mmHg, p=0.012) and a lower percentage of hemodynamic instability (46.7% vs. 86.7%, p=0.020). The LA group had shorter postoperative hospital stays (mean±SD: 6.4±2.7 vs. 10.1±3.4 days; p=0.003) than the OA group. Differences regarding metastasis rate (6.7% vs. 0, p=1.000) were not statistically significant between LA and OA groups. The median (IQR) follow-up time of 82 patients was 72.5 (47.0-103.5) months. Binary logistic regression showed that right-side tumors or those >8 cm in size were independent risk factors of OA. Conclusion: LA is a safe, minimally invasive procedure for LPCC and has relatively better perioperative characteristics in large medical centers. Patients with tumors on the right side or larger than 8 cm are more likely to undergo OA initially.

Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive adrenalectomy versus open adrenalectomy in patients with large adrenal tumors (≥5 cm): A meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) with open adrenalectomy (OA) in patients with large adrenal tumors (≥5 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) Guidelines. Five databases including Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. The time frame of the search was set from the creation of the database to March 2022. RESULTS: Ten studies including 898 patients were included. Compared to OA, MIA is superior for length of stay [LOS WMD = -3.52, 95% CI (-4.61, -2.43), P < 0.01], drainage time [DT WMD = -0.68, 95% CI (-1.27, -0.09), P < 0.05] and fasting time [FT WMD = -0.95, 95% CI (-1.35, -0.55), P < 0.01], estimated blood loss [EBL WMD = -314.22, 95% CI (-494.76, -133.69), P < 0.01] and transfusion [WMD = -416.73, 95% CI (-703.75, -129.72), P < 0.01], while operative time (OT) and complications are not statistically different. For pheochromocytoma, MIA remains superior for LOS [WMD = -3.10, 95% CI (-4.61, -1.60), P < 0.01] and EBL [WMD = -273.65, 95% CI (-457.44, -89.86), P < 0.01], while OT and complications are not significantly different. CONCLUSION: MIA offers advantages over OA in the management of large adrenal tumors, including in the case of a specific large adrenal tumor - large pheochromocytoma.

The Spectrum of Postoperative Complications and Outcomes After Open Adrenalectomy: An Experience From a Developing Country.

Background Open adrenalectomy is an invasive surgical procedure that is commonly performed for adrenal gland neoplasms in developing countries. Due to its complexity, the patients are predisposed to a number of complications and dismal outcomes. The objective of our study is to assess different characteristics of patients undergoing open adrenalectomy, including their histology, postoperative complications, and outcomes. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 107 patients undergoing open adrenalectomy for primary adrenal gland neoplasms. Patients with bilateral involvement, metastatic disease, or unresectable tumors were excluded. Patients were evaluated for different features that included demographic data, tumor properties, postoperative outcomes, and complications. Results Out of 107 patients, 45 (42.1%) were females. The mean age of the patients was 47.53 ± 8.45 years. Abdominal pain and severe headaches were the most common presenting complaints. A total of 96 (89.7%) tumors were benign, while 11 (10.3%) were malignant. Upon the histopathological examination of the resected specimen, adrenal adenoma was present in 49 (45.8%) cases, while adrenal pheochromocytoma was present in 41 (38.3%) cases. A total of 51 patients developed different postoperative complications including surgical site infections (22.4%), atelectasis (11.2%), deep venous thrombosis (7.5%), and retroperitoneal hematoma (5.6%). In-hospital mortality occurred in three (2.8%) patients. Conclusion Surgical site infections, atelectasis, deep venous thrombosis, and retroperitoneal hematoma were frequent postoperative complications after open adrenalectomy. These complications increase morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. Improved surgical techniques, intraoperative hemostasis, and multidisciplinary approach can yield favorable postoperative outcomes.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Adrenalectomy: a Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy (LA) has rapidly become the gold standard in management of adrenal tumors as it has been found to be associated with better cosmoses, shorter hospital stay and rapid convalescence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open approach to adrenal glands in terms of operative time, hospital stay, indications and blood loss at a tertiary medical center in Jordan. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study which included all patients who underwent adrenalectomy (open or laparoscopic) from 2005 to 2015 at King Hussein Medical Center (KHMC). Patients' demographics ,outcomes and essential study variables were extracted from patients' files. Data analysis was performed using SPSS17 and Stata 10. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients (mean age 44.9 years) were included, 90.2% of them underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The size of the tumors ranged from 2 to 17 cm (mean 6.6 cm).The operative time, blood loss and hospital stay were significantly less in the laparoscopic group (P value <0.001). Patients in Open group had a significantly higher risk of incomplete excision of the tumors (P value=0.020). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is associated with decreased operative time, blood loss and hospital stay compared to open approach. Tumor size and its malignant potential should be no more regarded as an absolute contraindication to laparoscopic adrenal surgery.

Laparoscopy versus open adrenalectomy in patients with solid tumor metastases: results of a multicenter European study.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of adrenalectomy carried out by laparoscopy or open surgery for solid tumor metastases was assessed. METHODS: A total of 317 patients with histologically confirmed adrenal metastatic disease collected from 30 centres in Europe underwent adrenalectomy by laparoscopy (n=146) or open laparotomy (n=171). Differences between laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy were assessed by a single Cox analysis for both procedures. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 24.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.4-26.6] months for open adrenalectomy and 45.0 (95% CI: 22.6-67.4) for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P=0.008). Survival rates were 68%, 49%, 35% and 29% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years for open surgery vs. 88%, 62%, 52% and 46% for laparoscopy, respectively. In the subgroup of R0 resections, the difference in survival in favor of laparoscopy (median 46 vs. 27 months) was marginally significant (P=0.073). Renal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23-0.76, P=0.005], surgery of the primary tumor (HR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.54), and use of chemotherapy (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) were associated with a better survival, whereas type of resection (R1/R2 vs. R0) was associated with a worse prognosis (HR 2.29; 95% CI: 1.52-3.44, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy patients showed a longer survival than open adrenalectomy individuals, as minimally invasive approach was attempted more common in less advanced disease which led to higher number of R0 resections.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) vs open adrenalectomy (OA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) vs open adrenalectomy (OA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). METHODS: A systematic literature research of PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and citation lists were performed to identify eligible studies. All studies comparing LA versus OA for PHEO were included. RESULTS: Overall, fourteen studies including 743 patients (LA 391; OA 352) were included. LA might have smaller tumor size (WMD -0.92 cm, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.76; p < 0.001) and higher body mass index (BMI) (WMD 0.31 kg/m2, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.58; p = 0.02). Compared to OA, LA showed lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD -207.72 ml, 95% CI -311.26, -104.19; p < 0.001), lower transfusion rate (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.38; p < 0.001), lower hemodynamic instability (HI) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.88; p = 0.009), less postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.89; p = 0.02), less Clavien Dindo score ≥3 complications (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; p = 0.04), shorter return to diet time (WMD -0.76 days, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.25; p = 0.003), and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD -1.76 days, 95% CI -2.94 to -0.58; p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis of studies since 2008 showed consistent results. CONCLUSION: LA shows a feasible, safe and superior treatment option for PHEO, because it provides superior perioperative and recovery outcomes without increasing complications.

Experience of a Tertiary-Level Urology Center in Clinical Urological Events of Rare and Very Rare Incidence. V. Urological Tumors: 1. Adrenal Myelolipoma.

OBJECTIVES: To present our center's experience in the management of adrenal myelolipoma in the context of shifting from the open to the laparoscopic adrenalectomy approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search of our center's records was done for reported cases of adrenal myelolipoma during the period July 2001-June 2016. All the cases with histopathologically-documented adrenal myelolipoma diagnosis were included. Relevant demographic and clinical variables were studied with a comparison between the open and laparoscopic approaches. RESULTS: Of more than 82,000 urological surgeries, 238 adrenalectomies were done with only 22 cases of myelolipoma that had a mean age and body mass index of 52.4 ± 10.3 years and 30.23 kg/m2, respectively. The main clinical presentation was accidental discovery. The largest dimension of tumors varied from 6 to 16 cm. Computed tomography described a characteristic picture of hypodense heterogeneous adrenal tumors in all cases, while magnetic resonance imaging was indicated for malignancy suspicion in only 5 cases. Adrenal tumor markers were normal in all cases. Open and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomies were used in 14 and 8 cases, respectively. The latter approach was insignificantly advantageous in the need for blood transfusion, postoperative pain degree, need for analgesia, and hospital stay duration (p = 0.22). Histo-pathological examination revealed benign adipose tissue and myeloid cells and confirmed the diagnosis of adrenal myelolipoma in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare non-functioning benign tumor. Laparoscopic excision seems to be a promising alternative approach to the traditional open adrenalectomy, even in the context of large tumors and obesity.