The UK prosthetic and orthotic workforce: current status and implications for the future.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetists and orthotists (POs) are the smallest of the 14 allied health profession (AHP) workforces within NHS England. Obtaining data on the workforce has always been challenging due to this information being held across different organisations. An understanding of the prosthetic and orthotic (P&O) workforce is essential to ensure that it is adequately equipped to meet the evolving needs of users of P&O services. The study aims to estimate the size and composition, for the first time, of the UK P&O workforce and P&O service provision. METHODS: To gather the required information, two surveys (one for the UK P&O workforce and one for UK P&O private company) and two freedom of information (FOI) requests [one for all NHS Trusts and Health Boards (HB) in the UK and one for the higher education institutes in the UK offering programmes leading to registration as a PO were developed and distributed from September to December 2022. RESULTS: The P&O workforce survey received a 74% response rate (863 POs) and 25 private companies reported employing one or more P&O staffing groups. From the FOI requests, 181 of a potential 194 Trusts/Health Boards and all four higher education institutions responded. The study indicated a total of 1766 people in the UK P&O workforce, with orthotists and orthotic technicians representing the largest percentage of the workforce at 32% and 30%, respectively. A greater percentage of prosthetists (65%) and orthotists (57%) were employed by private companies compared to the NHS. Only 34% of POs stated that they "definitely" planned to remain in the workforce for the next 5 years. The current UK PO employment levels are 142 to 477 short of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The low job satisfaction amongst many POs and the projected increase in the number of people who will require prosthetic and/or orthotic care in the UK are challenges for future UK P&O services. Strategies are required to create a sustainable and resilient workforce that can meet the needs of a changing healthcare landscape.

Impact of Wheelchair Seating Systems on Scoliosis Progression for Children With Neurologic and Neuromuscular Disorders: A Retrospective Study Of Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating and Modular Wheelchair Seating.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the comparative effect of 2 wheelchair seating systems, Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating (CCS) and Modular Wheelchair Seating (MWS), on scoliosis progression in children with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders and to determine any predictors for scoliosis progression. DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A national health service regional posture and mobility service. PARTICIPANTS: Nonambulant pediatric wheelchair users with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders (N=75; 36 men, 39 women; mean age at seating intervention, 10.50±3.97y) issued CCS and MWS by the South Wales Posture and Mobility Service from 2012-2022. INTERVENTIONS: Two specialized wheelchair seating systems, CCS and MWS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A generalized least squares model was used to estimate the effect of seat type on Cobb angle over time. RESULTS: Of the 75 participants enrolled, 51% had cerebral palsy. Fifty were issued CCS and 25 were issued MWS. Baseline Cobb angle was 32.9±18.9° for the MWS group and 48.0±31.0° for the CCS group. The generalized least squares model demonstrated that time since seating intervention (χ2=122, P<.0001), seating type (χ2=52.5, P<.0001), and baseline scoliosis severity (χ2=41.6, P<.0001) were predictive of scoliosis progression. Condition was not a strong predictor (χ2=9.96, P =.0069), and sex (χ2=5.67, P=.13) and age at intervention (χ2=4.47, P=.35) were not predictive. Estimated contrasts of medical condition with seat type over time demonstrated smaller differences between MWS and CCS over time. Predicted scoliosis velocity was found to attenuate with use of CCS over time compared with MWS, although scoliosis deteriorated regardless of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed pediatric wheelchair users with neurologic and neuromuscular disorders prescribed CCS showed greater mitigation of scoliosis progression over time compared with those issued MWS.

An Optical Sensor for Measuring Displacement between Parallel Surfaces.

An optoelectronic sensor was developed to measure the in-plane displacement between two parallel surfaces. This sensor used a photodetector, which was placed on one of the parallel surfaces, to measure the intensity of the red (R), green (G), blue (B), and white/clear (C) light spectra of a broad-spectrum light that was reflected off a color grid on the opposing surface. The in-plane displacement between these two surfaces caused a change in the reflected RGB and C light intensity, allowing the prediction of the displacement direction and magnitude by using a polynomial regression prediction algorithm to convert the RGB and C light intensity to in-plane displacement. Results from benchtop experiments showed that the sensor can achieve accurate displacement predictions with a coefficient of determination R2 > 0.97, a root mean squared error (RMSE) < 0.3 mm, and a mean absolute error (MAE) < 0.36 mm. By measuring the in-plane displacement between two surfaces, this sensor can be applied to measure the shear of a flexible layer, such as a shoe's insole or the lining of a limb prosthesis. This sensor would allow slippage detection in wearable devices such as orthotics, prostheses, and footwear to quantify the overfitting or underfitting of these devices.

Perspectives on remote learning of orthotic fabrication by certified hand therapists.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption to continuing educational opportunities for hand therapists. In response, some courses were offered via online platforms, including virtual orthotic fabrication courses. It is important to determine the effectiveness and benefits of these courses for educating certified hand therapists and examine if remote learning of orthotic fabrication skills has continued merit and relevance. PURPOSE: To investigate the value and effectiveness of orthotic fabrication courses taught in a virtual format. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, mixed methods survey study. METHODS: A 31-item survey consisting of Likert-type, direct response, and open-ended questions about experiences and opinions of virtual orthotics courses was electronically delivered to certified hand therapists. Data analysis included descriptive and correlational statistics to highlight frequencies, ranges, and relationships between the participant demographics and opinions/experiences. Thematic analysis guided the coding of the qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 459 responded, with a response rate of 9.7%. Most respondents had not participated in online courses on orthotic fabrication. Those that did reported high satisfaction but noted that clinical experience and knowledge from previous courses influenced this experience. Most participants felt that novice clinicians and students would not gain enough skills and confidence from online courses. However, participants with all levels of experience found the courses to be of value. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that while online learning of this skill set is valuable and effective, it is most beneficial for experienced clinicians. Disadvantages included the lack of instructor feedback necessary for hands-on skill development and the lack of peer interaction. Advantages included convenience of time, cost, accessibility, and the ability to revisit the topic as needed. Online learning of orthotic fabrication skills is a sustainable option for clinicians seeking to advance their skills. Nevertheless, it is not a substitute for initial training for novice hand therapists due to the lack of feedback and skill development.

Do current upper limb orthotic classification systems help clinicians choose and design effective orthoses? A scoping review with expert interviews.

BACKGROUND: Orthosis (orthotic) fabrication is an essential part of the treatment plan for many upper extremity conditions. PURPOSE: We aim to comprehensively identify the current body of evidence about the purpose, structure, scope, and application of available orthotic classification systems. Our secondary aim was to know if the current classification systems can be used as a decision guide for clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: A scoping review. METHODS: A scoping review of research studies identified through data-based and gray literature was conducted to determine studies that addressed classification systems of the orthosis (orthotic) in the hand and upper limb. Two investigators screened study titles and abstracts and did the data extraction. To do a comprehensive review, all the hand therapy associations were contacted and asked to share their specific orthosis classification system. To answer our second aim, we discussed our findings with the experts in a panel. RESULTS: Twelve different classification systems were identified, which were developed with different aims. Five classification systems classified orthosis based on their function (n = 5, 50%); one based on therapeutic goals and proposed a decision algorithm. Two of the proposed systems were aimed at helping in decision-making or offering an algorithm for therapists to help them choose the proper orthosis. The expert panel process identified that the current classification systems could not help clinicians select proper orthosis for their patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are different classification systems which were developed with various aims. However, none of those can help clinicians make informed decisions about appropriate orthosis choices for their patients.

Orthotic interventions for restoring proximal interphalangeal joint motion for patients with hand injuries or conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Limitations to proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) motion can result in significant functional impairment for people with hand injuries and conditions. The role of orthotic intervention to improve PIPJ motion has been studied; however, high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses are lacking. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of orthotic intervention for restoring PIPJ extension/flexion following hand injuries or conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was completed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central, and PEDro using terms related to orthoses, finger PIPJ range of motion, and randomized controlled trial design. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro score, study outcomes were pooled wherever possible using random effects meta-analysis, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included (PEDro score: 4-7/10). The addition of orthotic intervention was not more effective than hand therapy alone following Dupuytren's release for improving total active extension (mean difference [MD] -2.8°, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.6° to 4.0°, p = 0.84), total active flexion (MD -5.8°, 95% CI: -12.7° to 1.2°, p = 0.70), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (MD 0.4, 95% CI: -2.7 to 3.6, p = 0.79), or patient satisfaction (standardized MD 0.20, 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.09, p = 0.17). Orthotic intervention was more effective than hand therapy alone for improving PIPJ extension for fixed flexion deformities following traumatic finger injury or surgery (MD -16.7°, 95% CI: -20.1° to -13.3°, p < 0.001). No studies evaluated orthotic intervention to improve PIPJ flexion. CONCLUSION: The addition of an extension orthosis following procedures to manage Dupuytren's contracture is no better than hand therapy alone for improving PIPJ extension. In contrast, the addition of a PIPJ extension orthosis in the presence of traumatic PIPJ fixed flexion deformities is more effective for improving PIPJ extension than hand therapy alone. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of orthotic intervention for improving PIPJ flexion.

Validity and reliability of the Dutch translation of the OPUS' client satisfaction with device module in chronic users of hand orthoses.

BACKGROUND: Orthosis satisfaction is an important outcome in assessing quality of care. However, no measurement specifically assessing orthosis satisfaction is available in the Dutch language. Therefore, the aim of this study was to translate the Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) into Dutch, and to assess its content validity, structural validity and reliability in persons with chronic hand conditions. METHODS: The CSD was translated and cross-cultural adapted according to respective guidelines. To determine content validity, 10 chronic hand orthotic users and two professionals judged the relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness of the Dutch CSD (D-CSD). Thereafter, in a cross-sectional study, 76 persons were asked to complete the D-CSD twice, with a 2-week interval. Dimensionality of the D-CSD was examined by principal component analysis (PCA), and factor model fit was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed as internal consistency and test-retest reliability, including the 95% limits of agreement (LoA), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS: The D-CSD items and response options were deemed relevant and comprehensible. After adding an item on cleaning the orthosis, content validity was judged sufficient. PCA indicated a one-factor model, which was confirmed by CFA. We found good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82; 95%CI 0.75-0.87), and moderate to good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.81; 95%CI 0.71-0.87). There was no difference between the mean D-CSD score at test (26.8 points) and retest (25.9 points) (mean (SD) difference: 0.86 points (4.00); 95%CI -0.06-1.79; p = 0.07). The 95% LoA were -6.99 to 8.71, and the SEM and SDC were 2.88 and 7.98 points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on sufficient content and structural validity, and good reliability, we consider the D-CSD a useful tool to evaluate orthosis satisfaction in persons with chronic hand conditions on group level. Because of a relatively high SDC, sensitivity to detect changes over time on individual level is limited. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05320211.

Users' Perceptions About Lower Extremity Orthotic Devices: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review perceptions from adults, children, and caregivers in scientific and open sources to determine how well lower extremity orthotic devices (LEODs) meet users' functional, expressive, aesthetic, and accessibility (FEA2) needs. DATA SOURCES: Scientific source searches were conducted in the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and Web of Science; open source searches were conducted in Google Search Engine in April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were reporting of users' perceptions about a LEOD, experimental or observational study design, including qualitative studies, and full text in English. Studies were excluded if the device only provided compression or perception data could not be extracted. One hundred seventy three scientific sources of 3440 screened were included (total of 1108 perceptions); 36 open sources of 150 screened were included (total of 508 perceptions). DATA EXTRACTION: Users' perceptions were independently coded by 2 trained, reliable coders. DATA SYNTHESIS: Across both source types, there were more perceptions about functional needs, and perceptions were more likely to be positive related to functional than expressive, aesthetic, or accessibility needs. Perceptions about expression, aesthetics, and accessibility were more frequently reported and more negative in open vs scientific sources. Users' perceptions varied depending on users' diagnosis and device type. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant room for improvement in how LEODs meet users' FEA2 needs, even in the area of function, which is often the primary focus when designing rehabilitation devices. Satisfaction with LEODs may be improved by addressing users' unmet needs. Individuals often choose not to use prescribed LEODs even when LEODs improve their function. This systematic review identifies needs for LEODs that are most important to users and highlights how well existing LEODs address those needs. Attention to these needs in the design, prescription, and implementation of LEODs may increase device utilization.

Effectiveness of custom-made functional foot orthoses versus flat cushioning insoles on pain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of foot orthoses on pain, disability and foot functionality in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: University Podiatric Clinical Area. SUBJECTS: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to either group A, which received custom-made functional foot orthoses, or group B, which received flat cushioning insoles, for three months. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was foot pain, measured by 11-point numeric pain rating scale. Foot functionality and foot-related disability were evaluated using the foot function index, the Manchester foot pain and disability, at the beginning and at days 90. RESULTS: Sixty-six participants (age 47.3 ± 11.9 years) suffering from foot pain, received either the custom-made foot orthoses (N = 33) or the flat cushioning insoles (N = 33). For the analysis of the data, only participants who had finished the follow-up period (90 days) were included. None statistically significant difference between groups were found. In group A, all variables showed statistically significant differences when comparing the initial and final measurements. Pain showed 6.8 ± 1.6 and 4.2 ± 2.9 in group A, at baseline and at 90 days, respectively, group B showed 6.5 ± 1.5 and 4.7 ± 3.0 at baseline and at 90 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both groups showed a reduction in foot pain. This study suggests that not only controlling the foot function, but providing cushioning to the foot, may have positive effects to manage foot pain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Comparison between a novel helical and a posterior ankle-foot orthosis on gait in people with unilateral foot drop: a randomised crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular disease and peripheral neuropathy may cause drop foot with or without evertor weakness. We developed a helical-shaped, non-articulated ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) to provide medial-lateral stability while allowing mobility, to improve gait capacity. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of the helical AFO (hAFO) on functional gait capacity (6-min walk test) in people with peripheral neuropathy or neuromuscular disease (NMD) causing unilateral drop foot and compare with a posterior leaf spring AFO (plsAFO). Secondary aims were to compare functional mobility, 3D kinematic and kinetic gait variables and satisfaction between the AFOs. METHODS: Single centre, randomised crossover trial from January to July 2017 in 20 individuals (14 with peripheral neuropathy and 6 with NMD, 12 females, mean age 55.6 years, SD 15.3); 10 wore the hAFO for the first week and 10 wore the plsAFO before switching for the second week. The 6-min walk test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and 3D gait analysis were evaluated with the hAFO, the plsAFO and shoes only (noAFO) at inclusion and 1 week after wearing each orthosis. Satisfaction was evaluated with the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). RESULTS: Median [interquartile range] 6MWT distance was greater with the hAFO (444 m [79]) than the plsAFO (389 m [135], P < 0.001, Hedge's g = 0.6) and noAFO (337 m [91], P < 0.001, g = 0.88). TUG time was shorter with the hAFO (8.1 s [2.8]) than the plsAFO (9.5 s [2.6], P < 0.001, g = - 0.5) and noAFO (10.0 s [2.6]), P < 0.001, g = - 0.6). The plsAFO limited plantarflexion during the loading response (plsAFO - 7.5 deg [6.0] vs. noAFO -13.0 deg [10.0], P = 0.0007, g = - 1.0) but the hAFO did not (- 11.0 deg [5.1] vs. noAFO, P = 0.05, g = - 0.5). Quasi-stiffness was lower for the hAFO than plsAFO (P = 0.009, g = - 0.7). The dimensionless eversion moment was higher (though not significantly) with the hAFO than noAFO. Neither orthosis reduced ankle power (P = 0.34). Median total QUEST score was higher for the hAFO (4.7 [0.7]) than the plsAFO (3.6 [0.8]) (P < 0.001, g = 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: The helical orthosis significantly and considerably improved functional gait performance, did not limit ankle mobility, increased lateral stability, though not significantly, and was associated with greater patient satisfaction than the posterior leaf spring orthosis. Trial registration The trial began before registration was mandatory.

A qualitative exploration of adherence to wearing removable cast walkers in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: To explore adherence to wearing removable cast walkers (RCWs) among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). METHOD: A qualitative study was conducted by interviewing patients with active DFUs and using knee-high RCWs as their offloading treatment. The interviews were undertaken at two diabetic foot clinics in Jordan, using a semi-structured guide. Data were analysed through content analysis by developing main themes and categories. RESULTS: Following interviews with 10 patients, two main key themes with a total of six categories were identified: theme 1-reporting of adherence levels was inconsistent, included two categories: i) a belief in achieving optimal adherence, and ii) non-adherence was often reported indoors; and theme 2-adherence was a consequence of multiple psychosocial, physiological and environmental factors, which included four categories: i) specific offloading knowledge or beliefs influenced adherence; ii) severity of foot disease influenced adherence; iii) social support benefitted adherence; and iv) physical features of RCWs (the usability of the offloading device) impacted adherence. CONCLUSION: Patients with active DFUs reported inconsistent levels of adherence to wearing RCWs which, after deeper investigation, seemed to be due to participants' misperceptions of the optimal adherence. Adherence to wearing RCWs also seemed to be impacted by multiple psychosocial, physiological and environmental factors.

Influence of Specific Interventions on Bracing Compliance in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis-A Systematic Review of Papers Including Sensors' Monitoring.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common disease that, in many cases, can be conservatively treated through bracing. High adherence to brace prescription is fundamental to gaining the maximum benefit from this treatment approach. Wearable sensors are available that objectively monitor the brace-wearing time, but their use, combined with other interventions, is poorly investigated. The aims of the current review are as follows: (i) to summarize the real compliance with bracing reported by studies using sensors; (ii) to find out the real brace wearing rate through objective electronic monitoring; (iii) to verify if interventions made to increase adherence to bracing can be effective according to the published literature. We conducted a systematic review of the literature published on Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. We identified 466 articles and included examples articles, which had a low to good methodological quality. We found that compliance a greatly varied between 21.8 and 93.9% (weighted average: 58.8%), real brace wearing time varied between 5.7 and 21 h per day (weighted average 13.3), and specific interventions seemed to improve both outcomes, with compliance increasing from 58.5 to 66% and brace wearing increasing from 11.9 to 15.1 h per day. Two comparative studies showed positive effects of stand-alone counseling and information on the sensors' presence when added to counseling. Sensors proved to be useful tools for objectively and continuously monitoring adherence to therapy in everyday clinical practice. Specific interventions, like the use of sensors, counseling, education, and exercises, could increase compliance. However, further studies using high-quality designs should be conducted in this field.

Pedobarographic evaluation of five commonly used orthoses for the lower extremity.

INTRODUCTION: Orthoses are designed to achieve immobilization or off-loading of certain regions of the foot. Yet, their off-loading capacity for the specific regions has not yet been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the plantar pressure distribution of five commonly applied orthoses for foot and ankle in a healthy population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five orthoses (postoperative shoe, forefoot relief shoe, short walker boot, high walker boot, and calcaneus fracture orthosis) were compared pedobarographically using insoles on a treadmill to a ready-made running shoe in eleven healthy subjects (median age 29 years). Peak pressure, maximum force, force-time integral, contact time, and contact area were evaluated separately for the forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot. RESULTS: The forefoot relief shoe, the short- and high walker boot significantly reduced the peak pressure at the forefoot with no significant differences between these orthoses. None of the five orthoses off-loaded the midfoot, but the calcaneus fracture orthosis and the short walker boot instead increased midfoot load. For the hindfoot, the calcaneus fracture orthosis was the only device to significantly reduce the peak pressure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the specific off-loading capacities of different orthoses for specific foot regions in a healthy collective. The knowledge of absolute and relative load shifts for the different orthoses is of fundamental interest for targeted clinical decision-making of physicians.

Implementing an internal audit to change practice: Current evidence and review of patient outcomes enabled transition to the relative motion extension approach in the postoperative management of zones IV-VI extensor tendon repairs.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports use of the relative motion extension (RME) approach following extensor tendon repairs in zones V-VI yielding good or excellent outcomes. PURPOSE: To demonstrate how a 3-year internal audit and regular review of emerging evidence guided our change in practice from our longstanding use of the Norwich Regimen to the RME approach using implementation research methods. We compared the outcomes of both approaches prior to the formal adoption of the RME approach. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical audit. METHODS: A prospective audit of all consecutive adult finger extensor tendon repairs in zones IV-VII rehabilitated in our tertiary public health hand centre was undertaken between November 2014 and December 2017. Each audit year, outcomes were reviewed regarding the Norwich regimen and the RME early active motion approaches. As new evidence emerged, adjustments were made to our audit protocol for the RME approach. Discharge measurements of the range of motion of the affected and contralateral fingers and complications were recorded. RESULTS: During the 3-year audit, data was available on 79 patients (56 RME group including 59 fingers with 71 tendon repairs; 23 Norwich group including 28 fingers with 34 tendon repairs) with simple (n = 68) and complex (n = 11) finger extensor tendon zones IV-VI repairs (no zone VII presented during this time). Over time, the practice pattern shifted from the Norwich Regimen approach to the RME approach (and with the use of the RME plus [n = 33] and RME only [n = 23] approaches utilized). All approaches yielded similar good to excellent outcomes per total active motion and Miller's classification, with no tendon ruptures or need for secondary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: An internal audit of practice provided the necessary information regarding implementation to support a shift in hand therapy practice and to gain therapist or surgeon confidence in adopting the RME approach as another option for the rehabilitation of zone IV-VI finger extensor tendon repairs.

Use of relative motion orthoses from the perspective of hand-injured patients: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Relative motion (RM) orthoses have gained popularity with therapists as their versatility lends to "protective," "exercise," and "adaptive" uses. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To ask for comments from patients wearing RM orthoses for protective or exercise reasons. STUDY DESIGN: Interpretive descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews comprised of nine open-ended questions were conducted with 20 hand injured patients who were advised to wear a protective or exercise RM orthosis for at least 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty patients participated in the interviews. Thirteen patients wore the protective RM orthoses had a mean age of 28 years (range,16-54) and the mean age was 34 years (range, 20-51) for 7 patients using exercise RM orthoses. Interviews generated 4 major themes: physical characteristics of the orthoses, challenges in daily living activities, emotional response to orthotic wear, and impact of social environment. DISCUSSION: Comments from both groups of patients suggested the small size of the orthosis contributed to wearing the orthosis as advised. Most found the orthosis comfortable, when not, comments were related to rubbing of the orthosis causing pain and rigidity of the orthosis resulting in finger swelling. A few were impacted by the orthosis drawing attention to their injured hand. Those wearing the exercise RM orthosis often removed it instead of using it for nonintentional exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Comments obtained from the limited structured interview of 20 patients wearing protective or exercise RM orthosis may offer therapists with some understanding from the patient's perspective. Additional study is worthwhile.

Use of a relative motion flexion orthosis after epitendinous zone II flexor tendon repair: A case report.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report INTRODUCTION: Relative motion flexion (RMF) orthoses are emerging as an option for early active motion (EAM) postoperatively. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To describe the rationale and implementation of an RMF orthosis to manage a patient after partial zone II epitendinous flexor tendon repairs. METHODS: This case involves a female who sustained partial flexor tendon lacerations to her middle finger in zone II, 60% flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and 90% flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). After epitendinous repair she was referred to therapy for EAM with a no orthosis request. The unusual circumstances prompted the therapist, concerned about the risk of tendon rupture to engage in discussion with the surgeon. Following discussion, a decision was made to use an RMF orthosis for controlled EAM to protect the epitendinous zone II FDS and FDP repairs. Outcomes of range of motion (ROM), total active motion (TAM), %TAM, grip, and quickDASH are reported. RESULTS: Neither the FDP or FDS tendons ruptured, nor were there any joint contractures. "Good" %TAM outcomes were achieved at 12-week postoperatively. Quick DASH scores improved 61 points indicating a clinically meaningful difference of improved function. DISCUSSION: The lack of a multi-strand core suture repair is unusual in combination with EAM. The positive outcomes reported in this single patient have raised questions about the protective benefit of the RMF orthosis when used with a zone II epitendinous repair of a 90% FDP laceration. Epitendinous repair of a partial (60%) FDS injury, however, is not uncommon and often not repaired at all. CONCLUSIONS: In this single case report the epitendinous repairs of zone II 90% FDP and 60% FDS with digital nerve involvement were successfully managed with an RMF only orthosis. The use of EAM with an epitendinous repair is in conflict to the current surgical and therapy literature.

The relative motion concept in acute and chronic boutonniere deformity: Invited commentary.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. INTRODUCTION: Boutonniere deformity (BD) is a troublesome injury occurring from rupture of tissue connecting the extrinsic to intrinsic tendon systems. This causes loss of interphalangeal joint balance, and immobilization often results in adherence and difficulty restoring balance. PURPOSES: Review of relative motion flexion (RMF) orthotic use for safe healing during functional activity in 23 patients, and explanation of the rationale. METHODS: Anatomic rationale and clinical experience is reviewed in 8 acute BD patients utilizing RMF orthoses for 6 weeks, and for chronic BD patients, 3 months after serial casting. RESULTS: All patients met the Strickland and Steichen criteria for "excellent" results following treatment, with an average of 35° increase in ROM. DISCUSSION: The anatomic rationale for relative motion recognizes that altering relative positioning between adjacent metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints produces a protective favorable impact on interphalangeal forces during hand function using 15°-20° greater MCP joint flexion. This provides dorsal and volar protective benefits because the extensor digitorum communis (EDC), a single-muscle-four-tendon system, attaches to the intrinsic lateral band (LB) tendons. With greater MCP flexion, dorsal EDC force is increased, pulling lateral bands medially, while on the volar surface the downward pull of the lumbrical on LB is relaxed due to origin from the flexor digitorum profundus tendon of the injured digit, also a single-muscle-four-tendon system. The RMF orthosis permits protected active motion during functional activity with acute BD. In patients with chronic BD and adequate passive extension, an RMF orthosis for 3 months also produced encouraging results. CONCLUSION: Management of acute BD with RMF orthoses provided earlier recovery of motion and hand function. Similar results occurred for chronic BD using serial casting for adequate extension followed by 3 months of RMF orthotic use and should be attempted prior to surgical intervention, with surgery remaining an alternative.

Use of a relative motion flexion orthosis with dorsal hood to protect a middle phalanx finger fracture and zone III extensor tendon repair, while correcting a secondary fixed flexion proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) contractures, zone III extensor tendon injuries and phalanx fractures are challenging to treat in isolation. In this case the patient presented with all 3 of these issues in a single digit, presenting a unique problem for the hand therapist. PURPOSE: A case report to examine the effectiveness of using single orthosis to treat an index finger following a combined zone III extension tendon repair, surgically stabilized second phalanx fracture and PIPJ flexion contracture. METHODS: A patient presented to therapy with a 40° PIPJ flexion contracture and minus 70° of active PIPJ extension (ICD10 M25.64) after left index surgical fixation of a middle phalanx fracture (ICD10 S62.621B) and zone III extensor tendon repair (ICD10 S66.321A). To correct the contracture, a distal elastic strap was added to a relative motion flexion orthosis with dorsal hood. This applied a gentle extension force to the PIPJ. Once the contracture resolved a short arc motion program (SAM) was initiated using the same orthosis. RESULTS: At 20 weeks post initial therapy evaluation, active range of motion (extension/flexion) of the PIPJ was 5°/100° and distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) 0°/60°. The Quick DASH score improved 50 points from an initial 59 points to 9 points. The patient reported good satisfaction and full function of the hand. CONCLUSION: Our case report demonstrated the effective use of a single relative motion flexion orthosis with a dorsal hood when treating a complex hand injury involving an open zone III injury, second phalanx fracture and 40-degree PIPJ contracture.

Reduced pain and improved daily activities for individuals with hand osteoarthritis using a silicone wrist hand orthosis.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of hand osteoarthritis (OA), such as pain, reduced grip strength, loss of range of motion (ROM) and joint stiffness, can lead to impaired hand function and difficulty with daily activities. Rehabilitative interventions with orthoses are commonly in the treatment of hand OA to reduce pain, improve hand strength and ROM, provide support for improved function and help with joint stability. PURPOSE: The objectives of this perception-based study were to evaluate the effect of a silicone wrist hand orthoses (SWHO) on pain and daily functioning. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a qualitative descriptive study. The patient received outcome (PRO) questions in the study were based on the Patient Rated Wrist and/or Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. METHODS: Patients with OA using a SWHO were asked to complete a questionnaire about the effectiveness of the brace after wearing it for 3 weeks. Primary outcome measure was general daily functioning with and without the use of the SWHO. Secondary outcome measures were change in pain symptoms and limitations for certain activities with and without the aid. RESULTS: The results of this large-scale PROM study of 551 patients on the effectiveness of SWHOs in patients with hand OA show an improvement in overall daily functioning of 77% and a 61% reduction in perceived pain. This study adds to the evidence reported by systematic reviews of conservative interventions for hand OA and further quantifies the effects of a tailor made SWHO. This study confirms that wearing a wrist orthosis has a particularly significant impact on the execution of static and repetitive wrist-straining activities. CONCLUSION: The study on the effectiveness of a SWHO in patients with hand OA shows that the use of a SWHO contributes to general daily function, reduces pain and increases the breadth of potential daily activities. This study shows that the use of a SWHO appears to offer pain relief and suitable support to the joint.

An in-depth look at zone III and IV anatomy of the finger extensor mechanism and some clinical implications for use of the relative motion flexion orthosis.

BACKGROUND: For hand therapists and hand surgeons acute and chronic injuries of the extensor mechanism (EM) in zones III-IV are challenging to treat with satisfying results. INTRODUCTION: Early active motion combined with relative motion flexion (RMF) orthoses to manage EM zone III injuries and boutonnière deformity has renewed interest in the complex anatomy and biomechanics of the EM. PURPOSE: To provide an in-depth discussion of EM zones III-IV anatomy with emphasis on inter-tendinous structures, often omitted in simplified, model-wise illustrations which focus mostly on the tendinous structures. METHOD: In collaboration the authors combined on the one hand extensive clinical experience and knowledge of the EM literature and on the other hand decades of anatomical, biomechanical and kinesiology research of the EM with special interest for the spiral fibers, through gross anatomy and microdissection anatomy laboratory work, MRI and ultrasonography studies. RESULTS: The inter-tendinous tissues (i.e., spiral fibers) in zone III are of imminent importance for proper functioning of the EM and to prevent boutonnière deformity to develop after EM surgery or injury. DISCUSSION: Inter-tendinous links between the tendinous structures of the EM are necessary for balanced finger motion. The spiral fibers are described in more detail because of their role in controlling volar migration of the conjoined lateral bands and because their disruption makes development of boutonnière deformity more likely. Understanding the anatomy and biomechanics of the EM may assist in progress toward 'proof of concept' for use of RMF orthoses and controlled early active motion after EM injury or surgery. CONCLUSION: Hand surgery and hand therapy practice interventions, including use of RMF orthoses for management of non-surgical and surgical EM injuries may benefit from an in-depth look at the EM zone III and IV anatomy and biomechanics.