Patient-specific guides for consistently achieving R0 bone margins after resection of primary malignant bone tumors of the pelvis.

AIMS: Primary malignant bone tumor of the pelvis is an uncommon lesion, the resection of which via freehand osteotomy is subject to inaccuracy due to its three-dimensional anatomy. Patient-Specific Guides (PSG), also called Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI) are essential to ensure surgical planning and resection adequacy. Our aim was to assess their use and effectiveness. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective study was conducted on 42 adult patients who underwent PSG-based resection of a primary malignant bone tumor of the pelvis. The primary outcome was the proportion of R0 bone margins. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of overall R0 margins, considering soft-tissue resection, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence, and the time of production for the guides. A comparison to a previous series at our institution was performed regarding histological margins. RESULTS: Using PSGs, 100% R0 safe bone margin was achieved, and 88% overall R0 margin due to soft-tissue resection being contaminated, while the comparison to the previous series showed only 80% of R0 safe bone margin. The cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 10% (95% CI: 4-20%) at one year, 15% (95% CI: 6-27%) at two years, and 19% (95% CI: 8-33%) at five years. The median overall duration of the fabrication process of the guide was 35 days (Q1-Q3: 26-47) from the first contact to the surgery date. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-Specific Guides can provide a reproducible safe bony margin.

Step-cut osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity with application of patient-specific instrument in children: a preliminary report.

PURPOSE: The step-cut osteotomy has been recognized as a valuable approach for addressing cubitus varus deformity, albeit one that necessitates technical proficiency. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the modified step-cut osteotomy technique in conjunction with patient-specific instruments by clinical and radiological assessment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent modified step-cut osteotomy with the use of patient-specific instruments in conjunction with Kirschner wires fixation for the correction of cubitus varus deformity between April 2016 and April 2022. Follow-up was performed for a minimum of two years, during which pre-operative and post-operative clinical and radiological parameters were compared. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. The mean pre-operative humeral-elbow-wrist (HEW) of the affected side was -21.7° (ranging from -14° to -34°), while the normal side was 9.4° (ranging from 5° to 15°). The post-operation HEW of affected side was 9° (ranging from 4° to 16°). There was no significant difference between the normal side and affected side after operation (p = 0.74). Pre-operative range of motion in the affected side was 130°, while the post-operative range of motion was 132°. Fourteen patients (93.3%) were pleased with the overall appearance of their elbow. None lazy-S deformity was observed in these cases. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: The modified step-cut osteotomy technique, utilizing patient-specific instrument in conjunction with Kirschner wires fixation was found to be a safe, reliable, and technically easy procedure for correcting cubitus varus deformity.

Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the imaging and functional outcomes of patient-specific instrument-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P-UKA), robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA), and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed on five electronic databases and major orthopedic journals as of September 24, 2023. We included randomized controlled studies featuring at least two interventions of P-UKA, R-UKA, or C-UKA. Primary outcomes encompassed the deviation angle of hip-knee-ankle angle, as well as the coronal and sagittal plane alignment of femoral and tibial components. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), surgery time, revision rate, and complication rate. Bayesian framework was employed for risk ratio (RR) or mean deviation (MD) analysis, and treatment hierarchy was established based on rank probabilities. RESULTS: This NMA included 871 knees from 12 selected studies. In sagittal plane, R-UKA exhibited a significantly reduced deviation angle of femoral component compared to P-UKA (MD: 4.16, 95% CI: 0.21, 8.07), and of tibial component in comparison to C-UKA (MD: -2.45, 95% CI: -4.20, -0.68). Notably, the surgery time was significantly longer in R-UKA than in C-UKA (MD: 15.98, 95% CI: 3.11, 28.88). However, no significant differences were observed in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Compared with P-UKA or C-UKA, R-UKA significantly improves the femoral and tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane, although this does not translate into discernible differences in functional outcomes. Comprehensive considerations of economic and learning costs are imperative for the judicious selection of the appropriate procedure.

Patient specific instrumentation in ACL reconstruction: a proof-of-concept cadaver experiment assessing drilling accuracy when using 3D printed guides.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate positioning of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction is of the utmost importance to reduce the risk of graft failure. Limited visibility during arthroscopy and a wide anatomical variance attribute to femoral tunnel malposition using conventional surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a patient specific 3D printed surgical guide allows for in vitro femoral tunnel positioning within 2 mm of the planned tunnel position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient specific guide for femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction was created for four human cadaveric knee specimens based on routine clinical MRI data. Fitting properties were judged by two orthopedic surgeons. MRI scanning was performed both pre- and post-procedure. The planned tunnel endpoint was compared to the actual drilled femoral tunnel. RESULTS: This patient specific 3D printed guide showed a mean deviation of 5.0 mm from the center of the planned femoral ACL origin. CONCLUSION: In search to improve accuracy and consistency of femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction, the use of a patient specific 3D printed surgical guide is a viable option to explore further. The results are comparable to those of conventional techniques; however, further design improvements are necessary to improve accuracy and enhance reproducibility.

Feasibility and anteversion accuracy of a patient-specific instrument for femoral prosthesis implantation in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision and feasibility of patient-specific instruments (PSI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as compared to the traditional free-hand (FRH) approach. METHODS: During the period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, a randomized allocation was used for patients receiving unilateral primary THA to either the PSI or conventional operation group. The placement and size of the PSI were specifically chosen to guide femoral neck resection and prosthesis implantation. The study analyzed component positions and evaluated radiographic and clinical outcomes in 30 patients who received PSI-assisted THAs and 30 patients who received FRH THAs. This study was registered at China Clinical Trial Registry (number: ChiCTR2300072325) on June 9th, 2023. RESULTS: The use of PSI in THA resulted in significantly higher precision in achieving the desired component position as compared to the FRH approach. The PSI group showed significantly smaller absolute errors of femoral anteversion (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, hospitalization duration, or time to walk after surgery. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the application of patient-specific instruments in THA provides a simple and reliable solution to enhance the precision of femoral prosthesis placement with high accuracy and feasibility. This study highlights the potential benefits of using the PSI in THA.

Early outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using point-of-care manufactured patient-specific instruments: a single university hospital's initial experience.

BACKGROUND: The use of 3D-printed Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI) has been investigated to enhance the postoperative functional results in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and has been recognized as an innovative approach for the optimal alignment of hip implant components. Point-of-care production is gradually becoming the norm for PSI manufacturing. The purpose of this article is to assess the accuracy and safety of PSI for total hip arthroplasty performed at the point-of-care in Vietnam. METHODS: 34 THA cases were assessed in this prospective study. A template for the size and orientation of the implant and the design of the PSI was generated using data from preoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) scanning of the lower limb. The principal surgeon determined the implants' position and PSI design directly using the software. The PSI is then produced using a 3D-compatible resin printer in our manufacturing hospital. The PSI, consisting of an acetabulum and a femoral component placed press-fit on the bony surface, guided surgeons to precisely ream the acetabulum and cut the femoral neck according to the pre-planned plane. Postoperative CT scanning was obtained and superimposed onto the 3D model of the implant to evaluate the accuracy of the procedure by comparing the orientation values of the cup and the alignment of the stem between the planned and the actual results. Intra- and postoperative clinical parameters of surgery, including surgical time, intra-operative blood loss, complications, and the first ambulation, were also recorded to evaluate the safety of the surgery. RESULTS: The preparation for PSI required an average of 3 days. 94% of cup size and 91% of stem size were correctly selected. The mean values of postoperative inclination and anteversion were 44.2° ± 4.1° and 19.2° ± 5.6°, respectively. 64.7% of cases deviated from planned within the ± 50 range and 94.1% within the ± 10° range. There was no significant statistical difference between the planned and the achieved values of stem anteversion, osteotomy height, and leg length discrepancy (p > 0.05). The average surgical time was 82.5° ± 10.8 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was estimated at 317.7° ± 57.6 ml. 64.7% of patients could walk on the day of surgery. There were no complications reported. CONCLUSIONS: The point-of-care manufactured PSI is a useful solution for improving the accuracy of total hip arthroplasty surgery, especially in restoring implant orientation and reducing leg length discrepancy. However, long-term clinical follow-up evaluation is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Artificially Intelligent Three-Dimensionally-Printed Patient-Specific Instrument Improves Total Hip Arthroplasty Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has the potential to improve the accuracy of implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This prospective clinical study aimed to develop artificial intelligence to increase PSI production efficiency and assess accuracy, clinical outcomes, and learning curves. METHODS: A convolutional neural network was applied to automatically process computer tomography images. PSI size and position were designed to guide the acetabular preparation and femoral neck resection. Thirty patients who underwent PSI-assisted THAs were matched to thirty patients who underwent free-hand THAs, and the component positions, as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: PSI-assisted THA was significantly more accurate than free-hand THA at achieving the target component position. The mean absolute errors of cup inclination (P = .004) and anteversion (P < .001) were significantly smaller in the PSI group with fewer outliers. Calcar length (P = .002) and neck length (P = .026) were also more accurate in the PSI group. The leg length discrepancy was significantly lower in the PSI group (P = .002). There were no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, leg length discrepancy, or cup position among the first, second, and last 10 cases. CONCLUSION: PSI-assisted THA offered more accurate component positions and better radiographic outcomes than free-hand THA. There was no evidence of a learning curve. Our findings suggest that PSI is a convenient and practical option to help surgeons achieve accurate surgical outcomes.

Intra-articular opening wedge osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis with computer-assisted planning and patient-specific surgical guides: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted preoperative planning, combined with PSI has become an effective technique for treating complex limb deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel technique in corrective osteotomy for intra-articular varus ankle deformities associated with osteoarthritis and ankle instability. METHODS: Nineteen patients with intra-articular varus ankle arthritis were reviewed between April 2017 and June 2019, including ten men and nine women with a mean age of 58.3 ± 9.9 years (range, 38 to 76 years). All patients underwent intra-articular opening wedge osteotomy assisted by 3D virtual planning and PSI. Weight-bearing radiographs were used to assess the radiographic results, including TAS angle, TT angle, TMM angle, TC angle, TLS angle, opening-wedge angle, and wedge height. Functional outcomes were assessed by the AOFAS score, VAS score, and ROM of the ankle. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 32.2 ± 9.0 months (range, 22 to 47 months). The average union time was 4.4 ± 0.9 months (range, 3.0 to 6.5 months). The TAS angle significantly changed from 84.1 ± 4.6° preoperatively to 87.7 ± 3.1° at the 1-year follow-up and 86.2 ± 2.6° at the latest follow-up. Similarly, the TT angle, TMM angle and TC angle changed significantly at the 1-year follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment and remained stable until the last follow-up. However, the TLS was not corrected significantly. The postoperative obtained opening-wedge angle, and wedge height showed no significant change with preoperative planning. The overall complication rate was 15.8%. The mean VAS score improved from 5.3 ± 0.6 to 2.7 ± 0.7. The mean AOFAS score improved from 56.2 ± 7.6 to 80.6 ± 4.6. However, the ROM showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate correction and satisfactory functional recovery were attained with computer-assisted planning and PSI in the corrective osteotomy of intra-articular varus ankle deformities.

Total knee arthroplasty in femoral bowing: does patient specific instrumentation have something to add? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) proponents have suggested the benefits of improved component alignment and reduced outliers. In this randomized controlled trial, we attempted to assess the advantage of using PSI over conventional intermedullary (IM) guides for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with bilateral severe femoral bowing (> 5°). A parallel trial design was used with 1:1 allocation. We hypothesize that PSI would support more accurate alignment of components and the lower-limb axis during TKA with severe femoral bowing in comparison with conventional IM guides. METHODS: Among 336 patients undergoing bilateral TKAs due to knee osteoarthritis, 29 patients with bilateral lateral femoral bowing of more than 5° were included in this study. Every patient was assigned randomly to PSI on one side and to conventional instrumentation lateralization of the entry point of the femoral IM guide was applied on the other with a goal of neutral mechanical alignment. The assessment of coronal alignment was completed by measuring the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle on preoperative and postoperative long film standing radiographs. Coronal and sagittal orientations of femoral and tibial components were assessed on weight-bearing radiographs. The rotational alignment of the femoral component was evaluated using computed tomography. RESULTS: The postoperative mean ± standard deviation (SD) HKA angle was varus 4.0° (± 2.7°) for conventional technique and varus 4.1° (± 3.1°) for PSI, with no differences between the two groups (p = 0.459). The component orientation showed no significant differences except with respect to the sagittal alignment of the femoral component (p = 0.001), with a PSI mean ± SD flexion of 5.8° (± 3.7°) and a conventional method mean ± SD flexion of 3.2° (± 2.5°), due to the intentional 3° flexion incorporated in the sagittal plane to prevent femoral notching in PSI planning. Computed tomography assessment for rotational alignment of the femoral components showed no difference between the two groups concerning the transepicondylar axis (p = 0.485) with a PSI mean ± SD external rotation of 1.5° (± 1.3°) and conventional mean ± SD external rotation of 1.5° (± 1.6°). CONCLUSION: PSI showed no advantage over lateralization of the femoral entry for IM guidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on US national library of medicine ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02993016 ) on December 12th 2016.

Computer-assisted open reduction internal fixation of intraarticular radius fractures navigated with patient-specific instrumentation, a prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular fractures are associated with posttraumatic arthritis if inappropriately treated. Exact reduction of the joint congruency is the main factor to avoid the development of arthrosis. Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of computer-assisted surgical planning and 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for treatment of distal intraarticular radius fractures. METHOD: 7 Patients who suffered a distal intraarticular radius fracture were enrolled in this prospective case series. Preoperative CT-scan was recorded, whereupon a 3D model was computed for surgical planning and design of PSI for surgical navigation. Postoperative accuracy and joint congruency were assessed. Patients were followed-up 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 16 months. Over all range of motion was restored and flexion, extension and pronation showed significant recovery, p < 0.05. Biggest intraarticular joint step-off and gap reduced from average 2.49 (± 1.04) to 0.8 mm (± 0.44), p < 0.05 and 6.12 mm (± 1.04) to 2.21 mm (± 1.16), p < 0.05. Average grip strength restored (3-16 months) from 20.33 kg (± 7.12) to 39.3 kg (± 19.55) p < 0.05, 100% of the healthy contralateral side. 3D-accuracy for guided fragments was 2.07 mm (± 0.64) and 8.59° (± 2.9) and 2.33 mm (± 0.69) and 12.86° (± 7.13), p > 0.05 for fragments reduced with ligamentotaxis. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted and PSI navigated intraarticular radius fracture treatment is feasible, safe and accurate. The benefits of this method, however, do not outstand the additional effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Excision of Intramedullary Osteoid Osteomas in the Posterior Tibial Area via Medulloscopy: A Case Report.

Osteoid osteomas are benign bone-forming lesions that usually present in adolescence. In patients with severe pain and those not responding to medication, surgical treatment should be considered. Medulloscopy is a standard arthroscopic technique for visualizing the intramedullary canal of the tibia. Herein, we report two patients with intramedullary osteoid osteomas in the posterior area of the tibia, which were successfully treated using medulloscopy. Hence, medulloscopy is an effective minimally invasive method in patients with intramedullary osteoid osteomas in the posterior tibial area.

Patient-specific instrument-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation of calcaneal fracture for rapid and accurate execution of a preoperative plan: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods for minimally invasive internal fixation (MIIF) of calcaneal fractures require extensive intraoperative fluoroscopy, and fracture recovery is usually not ideal. We developed a new surgical procedure using digital surgical simulation and constructed a patient-specific instrument (PSI) for calcaneal fracture that we used during the operation. This study investigated whether PSI-assisted MIIF of calcaneal fracture enables rapid and accurate execution of the preoperative plan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with Sanders type III or IV fresh calcaneal fractures who had undergone PSI-assisted MIIF at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. We analyzed perioperative data including intraoperative fluoroscopy time, concurrence of internal fixation actual usage (IFAU) with the preoperative plan, surgery time, and complications. We also compared pre- and postoperative actual measurements from X-ray radiographs and computed tomography images including Böhler, Gissane, and calcaneus valgus angles; subtalar joint width; and calcaneal volume overlap ratio with the preoperative design. All patients had been followed up and their American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score was available. RESULTS: Mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 3.95 ± 1.78 h; IFAU in 16 patients (16 ft) was the same as the preoperative plan; mean surgery time was 28.16 ± 10.70 min; and none of the patients developed complications. Böhler, Gissane, and calcaneus valgus angles and subtalar joint width did not differ between pre- and postoperative plans; however, the actual preoperative values of each of these parameters differed significantly from those measured postoperatively. The calcaneal volume overlap ratio with the preoperative design was 91.2% ± 2.3%. AOFAS scores increased with time, with significant differences in the score at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed PSI-assisted calcaneal fracture MIIF method can rapidly and accurately execute the preoperative plan.

Effect of patient-specific instrument on lowering threshold for junior physicians to perform total hip arthroplasty on developmental dysplasia of the hip patients.

PURPOSE: To create a patient-specific instrument (PSI) in lowering the surgical experience requirement for junior physicians to perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) on developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients. METHODS: Combined with rapid prototyping technology, we created a PSI and established DDH hip model in vitro. We enrolled 48 junior physicians and randomly assigned them into two groups. After creation of the PSI, they performed simulated THA surgery on a full-scale hip model with or without PSI on DDH models. The planned prothesis orientation, post-operative prothesis orientation, and surgery time were recorded. RESULTS: The final cup inclination was 42.0 ± 0.8° in PSI group and 37.8 ± 2.0° in control group, while final cup anteversion was 16.0 ± 0.7° in PSI group and 24.7 ± 3.5° in control group. The △inclination in PSI group was smaller than that in control group (4.2 ± 0.5° vs 9.5 ± 1.4°, P < 0.01), so does △inclination (2.9 ± 0.4° in PSI group vs 15.2 ± 2.5° in control group, P < 0.01). The outlier percent was 8.3% in PSI group and 70.8% in control group (P < 0.01). At the same time, the PSI group did not prolong the operation time (P = 0.551). CONCLUSION: The PSI can greatly increase the accuracy of placing the cup orientation and lower the threshold for junior physicians to perform THA on DDH patients. It could be a training tool for them to increase their THA surgical skills.

Patient-specific instrument for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty does not reduce the outliers in alignment or improve postoperative function: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is one potential cause of postoperative failure. Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are designed to improve the alignment of the prostheses, but the effect of PSIs on the alignment or clinical outcome is controversial and lacks validated evidence. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the effect of PSIs on UKA outcomes for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI (Chinese database) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (up to June 2019) was performed to collect studies that compared PSIs with conventional instruments. Two reviewers independently screened all the records on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessments with Cochrane's quality assessment tool or Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) were conducted, the data were extracted, and statistical analyses were completed. RESULTS: Ten studies with 444 knees were included. The meta-analysis confirmed that PSIs contributed to reduced errors in the alignment of the femoral compartment in the sagittal plane (mean difference = - 2.53, CI [- 3.14, - 1.99], P < 0.01) and the tibial compartment in both the coronal (mean difference = - 0.97, CI [- 1.44, - 0.49], P < 0.01) and the sagittal plane (mean difference = - 1.29, CI [- 1.81, - 0.76], P < 0.01). One study supported that PSIs reduced outliers in inexperienced surgeons; however, all studies investigating PSIs among experienced surgeons suggested that PSIs cannot reduce the percentage of outliers. There was no significant difference in the postoperative score (mean difference = - 0.06, CI [- 0.36, 0.23], P = 0.68) or rate of complications (RR = 1.02, CI [0.15, 6.79], P = 0.99) between PSIs and conventional instruments. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest PSIs could not reduce the percentage of outliers in UKA patients for experts, and postoperative scores and complication rates are not improved by PSIs, compared with conventional instruments. Based on this meta-analysis and systematic review, no practical benefit to UKAs in experts was detected in PSIs. The findings of this study also suggest that PSIs improved alignment of UKA and might be beneficial to inexperienced surgeons, but it is still unclear whether this improvement is clinically significant and the evidence of inexperienced surgeons is limited. Therefore, more high-quality RCTs are need to be carried out in the future.

[Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation or 3D-printed patient-specific instruments].

Objective: To compare the perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) across three different techniques: computer-assisted navigation surgery (CAS), patient specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI). Methods: Ninety consecutive patients with severe knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral primary TKA in Peking University Third Hospital Orthopedics Department from January 2018 to December 2018 were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups (30 case in each group): CAS-TKA group, PSI-TKA group and CI-TKA group. The study measured intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, hidden blood loss, decreases of hemoglobin and hematocrit, and the post-TKA blood transfusions in the three groups. One-way ANOVA was used to detect the differences among the cohorts, and LSD was used for the post-hoc test. Results: The overall intraoperative blood loss of all patients was 6 ml (5~8 ml). The mean total blood loss and hidden blood loss in CAS-TKA group, PSI-TKA group and CI-TKA group was (1 147.0±301.8) and (1 140.1±301.9)ml, (1 044.3±454.1) and (1 038.5±454.0)ml, (1 154.0±483.6) and (1 145.3±482.7)ml, respectively; there was no significant differences among the three groups (F=0.639, 0.616, both P>0.05). There were no patients who received allogeneic blood transfusion. There were no significant differences in decrease of hemoglobin and hematocrit among the three groups neither (both P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with conventional TKA, CAS and PSI does not increase the total blood loss of TKA. However, they both demonstrate a potential benefit in reducing blood loss of TKA.

A prospective clinical trial to assess the accuracy of an MRI-based patient-specific acetabular instrument guide in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to conduct a prospective clinical trial to investigate the accuracy of an MRI-based patient-specific acetabular instrument guide during THA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective consecutive review of 14 hips in 14 patients who underwent primary THA with a posterolateral approach between September 2016 and February 2018. All preoperative planning and postoperative evaluations were completed on CT-based templating software. A pelvic MRI was taken to create a patient-specific surgical instrument guide. In order to assess the effect of increased experience on accuracy, we divided the cases into two groups according to when surgery was performed and investigated the absolute error in the acetabular component angle between preoperative planning and the postoperative state for each of the groups. RESULTS: We did not experience postoperative complications such as implant early dislocation in any of the cases. The absolute errors of acetabular implant angle using the patient-specific instrument guide were 3.7° ± 2.2° inclination and 4.5° ± 3.9° anteversion. The absolute error of the initial group was 4.7° ± 2.1° inclination and 6.1° ± 4.0° anteversion; for the later group, it was 2.8° ± 1.8° inclination and 3.2° ± 2.9° anteversion. There was a significant difference in the absolute error of acetabular implant placement between the initial group and the later group. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this study shows that MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation may be a useful alternative to surgical tracking during THA once the slight learning curve has been overcome.

Patient-Specific Surgical Guidance System for Intelligent Orthopaedics.

Clinical benefits for image-guided orthopaedic surgical systems are often measured in improved accuracy and precision of tool trajectories, prosthesis component positions and/or reduction of revision rate. However, with an ever-increasing demand for orthopaedic procedures, especially joint replacements, the ability to increase the number of surgeries, as well as lowering the costs per surgery, is generating a similar interest in the evaluation of image-guided orthopaedic systems. Patient-specific instrument guidance has recently gained popularity in various orthopaedic applications. Studies have shown that these guides are comparable to traditional image-guided systems with respect to accuracy and precision of the navigation of tool trajectories and/or prosthesis component positioning. Additionally, reports have shown that these single-use instruments also improve operating room management and reduce surgical time and costs. In this chapter, we discuss how patient-specific instrument guidance provides benefits to patients as well as to the health-care community for various orthopaedic applications.

[Effect of the surgical time and coronalmechanical alignment after total knee arthroplasty using computer navigation system, traditionalor 3D printing patient-specific instruments].

Objective: To compare the surgical time and postoperative coronal mechanical axis alignment in patients with osteoarthritis who were treated with three different total knee arthroplasty (TKA) techniques: computer-assisted navigation surgery (CAS), patient specific instrumentation(PSI) and traditional instrumentation. Methods: A total of 96 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral primary TKA by the same surgeon were included in this retrospective study.The patients were divided into CAS-TKA group (34 patients), PSI-TKA group (29 patients) and control group (33 patients) based on surgical techniques used in the operations.The surgical time and postoperative coronal mechanical axis alignment were compared between the three groups.One-way ANOVA was used to detect the differences between three groups, and LSD test was used for the post-hoc test. Results: The overall mean surgical time of the patients was (79±16) min.CAS-TKA group had significantly longer surgical time when compared with those in the other two groups [CAS-TKA vs PSI-TKA: (90±10) min vs (80±14) min, LSD-t=3.458, P<0.05; CAS-TKA vs control: (90±10) min vs (66±11) min, LSD-t=8.350, P<0.05; PSI-TKA vs control: (80±14) min vs (66±11) min, LSD-t=4.582, P<0.05]. The overall mean postoperative coronal mechanical alignment varus/valgus deformity was 2.4° and 2.0°, respectively.The overall outliers (varus/valgus>3°) represented 22.9% of cases and were distributed as followed: 11.8% in CAS-TKA group, 27.6% in PSI-TKA group, 30.3% in control group; and no significant differences was found among the three groups (χ(2)=3.771, P=0.151). Conclusions: The use of CAS or PSI in TKA costs a significant longer surgical time.These two techniques results in acceptable postoperative coronal alignment and both demonstrated a potential benefit in reducing outliers when compared with the traditional instruments.

[Review of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee prosthesis]. / Revue des guides personnalisés à usage unique dans les prothèses totales de genou.

OBJECTIVES: Single use patient-specific instruments (PSI) for total knee prosthesis are introduced as a new alternative to conventional ancillaries and computer assisted surgery by improving implants positioning. An exhaustive review was carried out to identify their specific characteristics, with their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: Medical devices suppliers were consulted in 2015 for reviewing their PSI. Their technical, clinical and economic data were compared. The results had been submitted to an orthopaedics expert commission of our university hospital for clinical and financial opinion. RESULTS: Ten companies have provided the documentation for the analysis. PSI are manufactured by suppliers using a three dimensional printing method based on CT scans or MRI images. PSI are produced according to the surgeon's preferences after a preliminary data check, which can be performed by the suppliers' engineers, the surgeon and automatic calculation. Five suppliers can produce sterile PSI with optional delivery of 3D bone models. According to the experts, the studies failed to demonstrate the superiority of a PSI or hospital economic gain. The prices listed remain high and operating room time is not always significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: With the development of personalized medicine, the role of PSI grows in importance. They facilitate the surgeon's work by fully respecting the anatomy. These systems offer an interesting perspective in their technical and pedagogical aspects. But it seems premature to take them into routine use given the low number of high-level studies that were currently done.

Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation.

PURPOSE: A 24-month prospective follow-up study was carried out to compare perioperative clinical outcomes, radiographic limb alignment, component positioning, as well as functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI). METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients, satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were scheduled to undergo TKA with either PSI or CI. A CT-based PSI was used in this study, and a senior surgeon performed all surgeries. Patients were clinically and functionally assessed preoperatively, 6 and 24 months post-operatively. Perioperative outcomes were also analysed, including operating time, haemoglobin loss, the need for blood transfusion, length of hospitalisation, and radiographic features. RESULTS: At 24-month follow-up, clinical and functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups. PSI performed no better than CI in restoring lower limb mechanical alignment or improving component positioning. There were no differences in operating time, haemoglobin loss, transfusion rate, or length of hospitalisation between PSI and CI. CONCLUSION: No significant clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CI after 24 months, and routine use of PSI is not recommended in non-complicated TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.