TRIACCESS Study: Randomized Comparison Between Radial, Femoral, and Pedal Access for Percutaneous Femoro-popliteal Artery Angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized study was to compare the success and complication rates of different access sites for the treatment of superficial artery stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 180 consecutive patients were randomized in a prospective study to treat symptomatic superficial femoral artery stenosis via radial (RA), femoral (FA), or pedal artery (PA) access. Technical success was achieved in 96.7%, 100%, and 100% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.33). Secondary access sites were used in 30%, 3.3%, and 30% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA access groups, respectively (p=0.0002). Recanalization for chronic total occlusion was performed in 34/36 (94.4%), 30/30 (100%), and 46/46 (100%) patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.17). The X-ray dose was significantly lower in the PA group than that in the RA and FA access groups (63.1 vs 162 vs 153 Dyn, p=0.0004). The cumulative rates of access site complications in the RA, FA, and PA groups were 3.3% (0% major and 3.3% minor), 16.7% (3.3% major and 13.3% minor), and 3.3% (3.3% major and 0% minor) (p=0.0085), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MACEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 5%, 6.7%, and 1.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of MALEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 20%, 16.7%, and 9.2%, respectively (p=0.54). CONCLUSION: Femoral artery intervention can be safely and effectively performed using radial, femoral, and pedal access, but radial and pedal access is associated with a lower access site complication rate and hospitalization. Pedal access is associated with a lower X-ray dose than that with radial and femoral access.

Outcomes of Peripheral Vascular Interventions via Retrograde Pedal Access for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in a Multicenter Registry.

Purpose: To describe the use and 1-year outcomes of retrograde pedal access during peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods: From October 2016 to September 2017, 159 patients (mean age 71±10 years; 112 men) undergoing PVI via retrograde pedal access were enrolled in the multicenter Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry. The pedal access approach included retrograde femoral (40%), antegrade femoral (26%), retrograde to antegrade femoral (22%), and pedal only (11%). A comparator group of 1972 patients (mean age 69±12 years; 1129 men) having a contralateral retrograde femoral access was established for propensity matching, which resulted in 156 patients per group. Procedure characteristics, technical success, and access site complications were compared. Major adverse limb events (MALE) and amputation-free survival (AFS) at 1 year were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Technical failure was similar for retrograde femoral and pedal access (7% vs 13%, p=0.07). Complications were rare and included access site hematoma (2 vs 5, p=0.32) and target artery thrombosis (0 vs 2) for the femoral vs pedal access groups, respectively. The rates of MALE at 1 year were significantly lower after retrograde femoral access (24%) compared with pedal access (38%; log-rank p=0.01; HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.30). AFS estimates at 1 year were similar: 86% for retrograde femoral and 83% for pedal access (log-rank p=0.37; HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.39), as were major amputation estimates: 10% for retrograde femoral access and 13% for pedal access group (log-rank p=0.21; HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.26). Conclusion: In this analysis of multicenter registry data, retrograde pedal access in patients with CLTI had similar technical success and early complications in comparison with traditional contralateral retrograde femoral access. The rates of MALE were higher after pedal access but AFS was similar, indicating a tradeoff between limb salvage and repeat interventions.

New Innovations and Devices in the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

As the number of patients afflicted by chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) continues to grow, new solutions are necessary to provide effective, durable treatment options that will lead to improved outcomes. The diagnosis of CLTI remains mostly clinical, and endovascular revascularization remains mostly balloon-based. Multiple innovative techniques and technologies are in development or in early usage that may provide new solutions. This review categorizes areas of advancement, highlights recent developments in the management of CLTI and looks forward to novel devices that are currently under investigation.

Functional hemodynamics assessment during endovascular Tibio-pedal retrograde intervention of peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to use a novel technique to measure the functional hemodynamics of peripheral arterial lesions during endovascular interventions. BACKGROUND: Functional hemodynamics has not been thoroughly evaluated during endovascular interventions. The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility and the potential benefits of pedal pressures measurements from tibio-pedal access. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular interventions via tibio-pedal artery access between October 3, 2018 and December 15, 2018. Baseline and postintervention pedal pressures from the pedal sheaths were measured. We also evaluated the pedal-brachial index (PBI) which is defined as the pedal sheath pressure divided by the simultaneously brachial cuff pressure. We compared baseline pedal pressures, postintervention pedal pressures, baseline PBI, postintervention PBI, % change of PBI ([postintervention PBI minus baseline PBI]/baseline PBI), and resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) versus baseline PBI in this cohort of patients. RESULTS: All 100 patients had successful tibio-pedal artery access. Baseline pedal pressure was 70 + 30 mmHg with post intervention pedal pressure of 133 + 27 mmHg (p < .001). Baseline PBI was 0.75 + 0.24 with post intervention PBI of 1.09 + 0.19 (p < .001). The correlation coefficient of resting ABI vs. baseline PBI was 0.55. The % change of PBI was 63.2 + 52.4%. There was significant improvement of postintervention PBI when compared to baseline PBI in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining pedal pressures and PBI from tibio-pedal access can be a feasible tool for endovascular interventions. This simple technique can provide us important functional hemodynamics information before and after peripheral revascularization.

Combined Radial-Pedal Access Strategy and Radial-Pedal Rendezvous in the Revascularization of Complex Total Occlusions of the Superficial Femoral Artery (the "No Femoral Access" Strategy).

PURPOSE: To describe the combined use of radial-pedal access for recanalization of complex superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusions unsuitable for transfemoral recanalization. TECHNIQUE: Patients are selected for this strategy if they have a long (≥ 10 cm) SFA occlusion with unfavorable aortoiliac anatomy, an absent ostial stump, or severely diseased and calcified distal reconstitution. Left radial artery and distal anterior or posterior tibial artery are accessed with 6-F and 4-F sheaths, respectively. The SFA lesion is crossed retrogradely with a 0.035-inch wire system. If retrograde crossing is not immediately successful, transradial subintimal tracking and radial-pedal subintimal rendezvous are used to allow retrograde reentry. Fifteen patients (mean age 62 ± 5 years; 11 men) have been treated in this fashion, and frequently stented, through the tibiopedal access. Seven patients required radial-pedal rendezvous to facilitate retrograde reentry. Two patients underwent transradial iliac stenting during the same session, and 1 patient underwent transradial kissing angioplasty of the profunda. No major complication occurred in any patient. After the procedure, the pulse across the accessed tibial artery was palpable in all patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with long and complex SFA occlusion unsuitable for transfemoral recanalization, a radial-pedal strategy can overcome revascularization obstacles.

Retrograde pedal access and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for salvage of an occluded vein bypass.

Managing occlusions in a lower extremity bypass is challenging, although several surgical methods and percutaneous devices are available for treatment. A 64-year-old man presented with subacute failure of his infrainguinal vein bypass. Because we were unable to access the bypass in an antegrade fashion, we accessed the bypass graft via retrograde pedal access. The occluded vein graft was salvaged with the Pounce percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy system (Surmodics) with the use of a 0.014-in. through and through buddy wire to maintain access in the bypass alongside the Pounce system to allow multiple passes of the nitinol baskets to retrieve thrombus.

Safety of Retrograde Tibial-Pedal Access and Intervention in Patients with Single Remaining Non-Occluded Infra-Popliteal Runoff Artery.

BACKGROUND: The adaptation of retrograde tibial-pedal access for peripheral angiogram and intervention is limited by the lack of operator experience and concern for small distal vessel injury. This study evaluates the safety of the retrograde tibial-pedal access for peripheral angiogram and intervention in patients with two vessel infra-popliteal artery chronic total occlusions, where the access point is the sole remaining non-occluded infra-popliteal artery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 5687 consecutive patients who underwent peripheral angiograms by retrograde tibial-pedal access via the single remaining non-occluded infra-popliteal artery was performed. Patients who had retrograde tibial-pedal access at the sole remaining infra-popliteal artery confirmed by angiography were included. Clinical and ultrasound data of the accessed infra-popliteal vessel up to 6 months were collected. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 314 patients (152 males; mean age 77.9 years). At 6 months, access vessel complications occurred in 15 patients (4.8%). Access vessel occlusion occurred in 9 out of 314 patients (2.9%), arteriovenous fistula in 4 (1.3%), with spontaneous resolution in 2, pseudoaneurysm requiring thrombin injection in 2 (0.6%) and non-cardiovascular death in 1 (0.3%). No uncontrolled bleeding, procedure-related hospitalizations or limb amputations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Routine primary retrograde tibial-pedal access for lower extremity peripheral artery diagnostic angiography and intervention in patients with single infra-popliteal artery runoff can be safety performed in an outpatient setting with infrequent and manageable complications.

Advanced Endovascular Techniques for Limb Salvage.

As the number of patients affected by peripheral arterial disease continues to increase, new technical approaches and devices have been developed to provide effective and durable treatment options that will lead to improved outcomes. While the mainstay of endovascular intervention remains mostly balloon-based, several innovative techniques and technologies are in development that may provide new solutions. This review highlights recent endovascular advancements in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and additional adjunctive devices that are needed to improve lesion patency, reduce the need for reintervention, and lead to better patient-centered functional outcomes.

How I do it: Pedal access and pedal loop revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

An increasing proportion of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia are older and have multiple comorbidities, including diabetes and renal failure. For those who are not candidates for a surgical bypass, this set of patients presents a challenge to vascular surgeons and interventionalists owing to the complex below-the-knee and increasingly below-the-ankle disease pattern that can fail traditional approaches for endovascular intervention. Two techniques, the retrograde pedal access and the pedal-plantar loop technique, can be useful in these settings and in skilled hands can be used safely, with a high technical success rate. In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who are not candidates for a single-segment saphenous vein bypass, the retrograde pedal access technique can be used not only in the setting of failed antegrade treatment, but also primarily when faced with a difficult groin or as an adjunct during a planned antegrade-retrograde intervention. The pedal plantar loop technique allows for retrograde access to tibial vessels without retrograde vessel puncture and additionally offers the ability to treat the pedal-plantar arch, which may have added benefit in wound healing. We describe the tips and tricks for these two techniques used in our limb salvage practice.

Trans-pedal access for endovascular revascularization in complex infra-popliteal lesions in critically ischemic limb: A cohort study.

Background: critical limb ischemia is one of the most challenging cases we face nowadays with high risk for amputation, retrograde trans-pedal angioplasty offers an alternative technique after failure of traditional ante-grade angioplasty. Patients and Methods: 96 patients underwent trans-pedal or trans-tibial retrograde angioplasty after failure of the traditional ante-grade angioplasty with the aid of US, 21-gauge needle and 0.018 wire through sheath-less approach as a last chance for revascularization. Results: clinical success or improvement in 77 cases (80.2%), and in other 19 cases (19.8%) there was no clinical success or improvement. The technical success was achieved in 81 cases with percentage of (84.4%), and not achieved in 15 cases (15.6%) only. Conclusions: Retrograde Trans-pedal angioplasty is an efficient, safe, and practical procedure with a high technical success and a relatively minimal procedural adverse effect.

Multi-Level Lower Extremity Arterial Revascularization Via Retrograde Pedal Access Under Local Anesthesia in a Patient With Severe Cardiopulmonary Comorbidities: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is a severe form of peripheral artery disease that leads to high rates of amputation and mortality if left untreated. Bypass surgery and antegrade endovascular revascularization through femoral artery access from either side are accepted as conventional treatment modalities for critical limb ischemia. The retrograde pedal access revascularization is an alternative treatment modality useful in specific clinical scenarios; however, these indications have not been well described in literature. This case report highlights the use of retrograde pedal access approach as primary treatment modality in a patient with an extensive comorbidities precluding general anesthesia nor supine positioning. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is a 60-year-old female with multiple severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities presenting with dry gangrene of the right great toe. Her comorbidities and inability to tolerate supine positioning precluded her from receiving open surgery, general anesthesia or monitored sedation, or percutaneous femoral access. Rather, the patient underwent ankle block and retrograde endovascular revascularization via dorsalis pedis artery access without post-operative complications. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of comorbidities related to peripheral artery disease is increasing and with it the number of patients who are not optimal candidates for conventional treatment methods for critical limb ischemia. The retrograde pedal access revascularization as initial treatment modality offers these patients an alternative limb salvaging treatment option.

Tibio-pedal arterial pressure assessment during endovascular intervention to improve quality-of-life in patients with intermittent claudication.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and the tibio-pedal arterial pressure post-endovascular intervention. Background: Physiological assessment of peripheral arterial lesions is infrequently performed during endovascular interventions. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 343 patients with intermittent claudication who underwent an endovascular intervention via tibio-pedal artery access from October 2018 to May 2021. The baseline and post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressures from the pedal sheaths were measured. QOL was assessed using a pre-validated Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) score before and at 30-day after intervention. We compared the baseline tibio-pedal arterial pressure, post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressure, delta pressure (post-intervention minus baseline), baseline WIQ scores, 30-day WIQ scores, and delta score (30-day minus baseline). Results: All 343 patients had successful tibio-pedal accesses. The average tibio-pedal arterial pressure at baseline was 87.0 ± 1.8 mmHg vs. 135.5 ± 1.7 mmHg post-intervention (p < 0.001). Average baseline and 30-day WIQ scores were summation (99.8 ± 3.3 vs. 115.0 ± 3.1, p < 0.001), walking distance (35.7 ± 1.3 vs. 42.5 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), walking speed (21.1 ± 0.9 vs. 23.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.036), stair climbing (4.7 ± 1.4 vs. 24.2 ± 1.4, p = 0.019), and symptoms (18.8 ± 0.2 vs. 20.1 ± 0.2, p < 0.001), respectively. When comparing the increased post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressure <60 mmHg vs. ≥60 mmHg, the average delta WIQ scores were all significantly improved with summation (10.0 ± 3.9 to 25.8 ± 5.5, p = 0.01), walking distance (4.1 ± 1.7 to 9.8 ± 2.5, p = 0.02), walking speed (1.5 ± 1.1 to 4.3 ± 1.5, p = 0.02), stair climbing (2.3 ± 1.8 to 9.4 ± 2.5, p = 0.02), and symptoms (1.0 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 0.4, p = 0.04), respectively. Conclusion: Increasing the post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressure by 60 mmHg can enhance QOL as suggested by improvement of WIQ scores.

Distal Bypass Versus Infrageniculate Endovascular Intervention for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) carries a high risk of amputation and warrants urgent intervention. CLTI involving the infrageniculate vessels, in particular, carries a considerably higher risk of major limb amputation. Open surgical bypass is the historical gold standard for the treatment of tibial arterial disease; however, endovascular therapy provides an attractive alternative in this high-risk patient population. In this article, we review the existing literature regarding distal bypass and infrageniculate endovascular intervention in patients with CLTI.

When Pedal Access Is the Only Way to Save a Limb!

Critical limb ischemia is associated with high rates of amputation and death. Endovascular revascularization prevents amputation in approximately 80 to 90% of patients. Traditional access, however, can be a problem in some patients and pedal access may be the only way to provide adequate revascularization and potentially prevents an amputation. We present three cases to illustrate how pedal access can be the last frontier to save a leg.

A Combined Radial and Pedal Access to Treat a Flush Chronic Total Occlusion of the Superficial Femoral Artery in a Critical Limb Ischemia Patient.

We present a case of a flush chronic total occlusion of the superficial femoral artery treated successfully with a combined antegrade approach using radial access and a retrograde approach using a pedal access. Patient has total occlusion of the contralateral left external iliac and common femoral artery. Our case illustrates the feasibility of the combined pedal-radial approach in treating flush occlusions of the superficial femoral artery.

Retrograde Pedal Access-Cutting Edge or Comical?

Retrograde pedal access is a technique utilized with increasing frequency by many interventionists to address patients with advanced multilevel peripheral artery disease and significant comorbidities. This approach to revascularization is being used both in patients who fail traditional antegrade access and in some patients thought to be poor candidates for antegrade approach. However, the lack of randomized controlled trial data, or long-term results, coupled with the associated potential risks including dissection, spasm, and thrombosis have rendered retrograde pedal access a controversial topic. This article details the pros and cons associated with the debate surrounding retrograde pedal access and highlights the current literature and remaining questions regarding outcomes of this technique.

Endovascular Access for Challenging Anatomies in Peripheral Vascular Interventions.

Vascular interventionalists continue to expand the scope and breadth of endovascular procedures that we offer to our patients. However, we often have to overcome various anatomical and technical challenges to deliver an endovascular device. This article should give the modern interventionalist an array of technical tips and tricks to enable them to overcome various challenging anatomical features such as vessel tortuosity, vascular calcifications, and increasing abdominal pannus. We also hope to elucidate alternative accesses such as radial access, pedal access, popliteal access, and direct stent access as well as direct aortic access.

Retrograde Tibiopedal Access for the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia.

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Many patients with CLI are poor surgical candidates. Endovascular therapy has been shown to be an effective technique to improve arterial perfusion for patients with CLI. In patients with isolated infrapopliteal occlusive disease, endovascular therapy may be more effective than conventional bypass surgery. When antegrade endovascular revascularization fails, an understanding of tibiopedal access and retrograde crossing techniques is essential to re-establish flow to aid in tissue healing, provide symptomatic relief, and avoid amputation.

Subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention (SAFARI) and rertograde access for critical limb ischemia.

Retrograde access techniques involve the addition of a retrograde access into the distal target vessel to aid in recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Many patients with critical limb ischemia are also poor surgical candidates because of comorbidities or lack of suitable landing zone for bypass procedures. This approach may be helpful in the setting of chronic occlusions that cannot be crossed via conventional antegrade true-lumen approaches. Subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention technique can be used when the occlusion was crossed in the subintimal plane and antegrade re-entry techniques failed. It may also be useful for flush superficial femoral artery occlusions or those lesions that extend into the trifurcation vessels. Proficiency in these techniques allows limb salvage in patients who lack surgical options and would otherwise undergo amputation.