Medication risks in older patients (70 +) with cancer and their association with therapy-related toxicity.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate medication-related risks in older patients with cancer and their association with severe toxicity during antineoplastic therapy. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of two prospective, single-center observational studies which included patients ≥ 70 years with cancer. The patients' medication lists were investigated regarding possible risks: polymedication (defined as the use of ≥ 5 drugs), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), and relevant potential drug-drug interactions (rPDDI). The risks were analyzed before and after start of cancer therapy. Severe toxicity during antineoplastic therapy was captured from medical records according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The association between grade ≥ 3 toxicity and medication risks was evaluated by univariate as well as multivariate regression adjusted by ECOG and age. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 136 patients (50% female, mean age 77 years, 42% hematological malignancies). Before the start of cancer therapy, patients took on average 5 drugs as long-term medication and 52% of patients were exposed to polymedication. More than half of patients used at least one PIM. Approximately one third of patients exhibited rPDDI. The prevalence of medication risks increased after start of cancer therapy. rPDDI were significantly associated with severe overall toxicity (OR, 5.07; p = 0.036; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.11-23.14; toxicity in patients with rPDDI 94.1% (32/34) vs 75.9% (60/79) in patients without rPDDI) and hematological toxicity (OR, 3.95; p = 0.010; 95% CI 1.38-11.29; hematological toxicity in patients with rPDDI 85.3% (29/34) vs 59.5% (47/79) in patients without rPDDI). In the multivariate analysis adjusted by ECOG and age, only the association for rPDDI with hematological toxicity remained statistically significant (OR, 4.51; p = 0.007; 95% CI 1.52-13.38). These findings should be further investigated in larger studies. CONCLUSION: Medication risks are common in older patients with cancer and might be associated with toxicity. This raises the need for tailored interventions to ensure medication safety in this patient cohort.

[Clinical medication review in French community pharmacy: Interest of a new pharmaceutical service for detection of drug related problems]. / Le bilan partagé de médication: intérêt de la mise en place d'un nouveau service pharmaceutique dans la detection de problemes lies aux therapeutiques.

OBJECTIVE: Using clinical medication reviews, analyze the most pharmaceuticals intervention generating treatments and the problems associated. METHODS: Analysis of activity reports made by 6th year pharmaceutical students from the University of Bordeaux, class of 2017-2018. RESULTS: 76 % of clinical medication review have detected at least one drug related problem in the population of this study. Drug classes that most frequently lead to pharmaceutical interventions are nervous system drugs, alimentary tract and metabolisma drugs and cardiovascular system drugs. The most frequent drug related problems are an unjustified prescription, a contraindication or a non-compliance with the standards of care and posology issues. CONCLUSIONS: The most at risk and pharmaceutical intervention generating drugs in this study are the same as described in the international literature. This shows that more precautions must be taken for their use in the elderly. Furthermore, this new pharmaceutical service is an efficient way to detect them.

[A new support given to patients in retail pharmacies: The "shared checkup of medication"]. / Un nouveau dispositif d'accompagnement du patient en officine : le « bilan partagé de médication ¼.

In accordance with the recommendations of the HPST law of 21st July 2009, the retail pharmacists heavily put a lot into new missions, concerning as well prevention and screening as therapeutic education of patient. In that context, two types of pharmaceutical conversations relative to patient's therapeutic training were primarily planned : the first one concerns patients with thrombosis' risk treated by oral anticoagulants (antivitamin K or direct oral anticoagulant), whereas the second one is intended to asthmatics cured by corticoids' inhalation. Then the publication in 2017 and 2018 respectively of amendments no 11 et 12 to the National convention of 4th April 2012 organizing relationships between titular pharmacists and health insurance planned a third type of support called « shared checkup of medication ¼. It is a matter of program of personalized pharmaceutical monitoring intended to patients at least 65 years old and suffering from one or several long-lasting affection(s), and also to patients at least 75 years old and chronically treated by at least five different active substances. Those new pharmaceutical conversations aim on the one hand to improve observance of chronic medications - current by elderly patients - and on the other hand to prevent drug iatrogenesis - favored by polymedication - while reasserting the major role of the retail pharmacist as health professional.

[Telemedicine and drug iatrogenesis in nursing homes]. / Télémédecine et iatrogénie médicamenteuse en Ehpad.

Inappropriate drug prescribing is an avoidable cause of adverse drug events, sources of an increase in morbimortality, excess spending and a decrease in quality of life. Many actions exist to improve prescribing quality and to secure the medication circuit in nursing homes. As part of the deployment of telemedicine, the benefit of a medico-pharmaceutical tele-expertise system for medication is evident.

[Assessment of medication prescribing in a geriatric follow-up care and rehabilitation]. / Évaluation de la prescription médicamenteuse dans un service de SSR gériatrique.

The aim of the study was to analyse the prescriptions and identify the factors associated with inappropriate prescribing (IP) and polypharmacy. Polypharmacy and IP concerned 80% of the 54 patients included in the study upon admission, and 78% upon discharge without a statistically significant reduction. A critical analysis of prescriptions would help to reduce inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy in elderly patients.

[Liver injury induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor-therapy : Example of an immune-mediated drug side effect]. / Leberschaden durch Therapie mit Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibitoren : Beispiel einer immunvermittelten Medikamentennebenwirkung.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced liver injury is increasing, especially in elderly patients with polymedication and multimorbidity. OBJECTIVES: Clinicopathologic correlation of immune-mediated liver injury, specifically liver injury following therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA4. METHODS: Histologic assessment of liver biopsies of nine patients after therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and correlation with clinical parameters. RESULTS: In all nine patients, liver injury was apparent after variable administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Transaminase levels were increased up to a maximum of 3818 U/l. Liver histology showed liver injury resembling autoimmune hepatitis respective cholangitis. In two patients, veno-occlusive disease was seen. Corticosteroid therapy was initiated in eight patients, subsequently four patients showed decreasing transaminases and five patients died of tumor progress. In three patients, it remains unclear whether liver injury by immune checkpoint inhibitors may have ultimately contributed to the fatal course, especially in one patient with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors may lead to potentially fatal immune phenomena in susceptible patients, which may affect liver and/or other organs independently. Other causes of hepatopathy need to be ruled out clinically and/or histologically.

[Medication safety for nursing home residents]. / Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit bei Heimbewohnern.

Due to demographic change, the number of elderly patients in need of long-term care is continuously increasing. Residents in nursing homes often suffer from various chronic diseases leading to the prescription of a plethora of drugs and a high risk for adverse drug reactions (ADR). Particularly, CNS-active drugs are critical in this context. Moreover, the medication process in nursing homes is complex with numerous interfaces and error sources. Therefore, medication safety for long-term care residents is regarded as a multiprofessional challenge.In Germany, several model projects have been conducted and initiated that aim at enhancing medication safety in nursing homes. The AMTS-AMPEL project is the largest intervention study so far dealing with medication safety in German long-term care facilities. After implementation of a complex multiprofessional intervention consisting of educative and structural measures, prevalence and incidence of preventable ADR could be significantly reduced. This and other projects suggest that medication safety in long-term care residents can be improved by targeted multiprofessional interventions.Although there is already evidence that interventions enhancing medication safety can improve medication appropriateness and solve drug-related problems, they still lack evidence of affecting clinical endpoints like hospitalization rate and mortality. Nevertheless, the model projects already enhance patient safety by increasing the awareness for risks in the medication process in long-term care facilities.

[Evaluation of the prescription of proton pump inhibitors in persons aged 75years and older in a geriatric acute-care unit]. / Évaluation de la prescription des inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons chez la personne âgée de 75 ans et plus dans un service de gériatrie aiguë.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely prescribed in France and could be responsible for adverse drug reactions especially in elderly persons (EP). In order to reduce the misuse of PPI and the excess cost to the Social Security Agency, the French health authorities (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]) have published strict guidelines for their prescription. We conducted a study in EP to determine the proportion of PPI prescriptions outside HAS guidelines. METHOD: This was a prospective, single-centre observational study in persons aged≥75 years admitted to a geriatric acute-care unit over a period of 6months. The prevalence of prescriptions for PPI and the proportion of prescriptions outside the guidelines were calculated. The sociodemographic and medical characteristics of EP treated with PPI were studied as were the reasons for the prescription of PPI. RESULTS: Among the 818 patients hospitalized during the study period, 270 were taking PPI on admission (33%). Among these prescriptions, 60% were outside the HAS guidelines. Gastro-oesophageal reflux was the leading indication for PPI (30%), followed by dyspepsia (19%). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the high prevalence of prescriptions for PPI and their misuse. As these drugs are apparently well tolerated, prescriptions are often renewed with no medical re-evaluation.

Association of anemia with functional and nutritional status in the German multicenter study "GeriAnaemie2013".

OBJECTIVES: Anemia and malnutrition are risk factors for frailty in older people but data from multicenter studies among German geriatric inpatients are lacking. This analysis evaluated data from the multicenter study "GerAnaemie2013" commissioned by the German Geriatric Society. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved an analysis of the 579 geriatric inpatients recruited in the context of the German multicenter study "GeriAnaemie2013". Study parameters: Barthel index (BI), handgrip strength, nutritional data (e.g. loss of appetite, loss of weight and decreased food intake). INCLUSION CRITERIA: in-patient age ≥70 years, exclusion criteria: current cancer disease or cancer-associated treatment. Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 81.9 years, overall prevalence of anemia 55.1 %, mean hemoglobin (Hb) level 11.9 g/dl, average BI 50.8 points and 30.3 % of all patients were at risk of malnutrition. While univariate analysis revealed a significantly lower BI in anemic patients, this association was no longer seen in multivariate analysis. Regression analysis revealed that a drug intake of > 5 drugs/day doubles the chance of suffering from anemia with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.17 (confidence interval (CI) 1.28-3.68, p = 0.004) as well as a serum albumin level below 3.5 g/dl with an adjusted OR of 2.11 (range 1.40-3.19, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Polymedication and low serum albumin were independent risk factors for anemia in geriatric patients, probably reflecting disease severity.

[Polypharmacy and geriatric psychiatry]. / Polymédication et gérontopsychiatrie.

The ageing of the population is synonymous with multiple pathologies and polypharmacy, which increases risk factors. François-Tosquelles general hospital carried out a study into the administering of medicines within the ageing population in psychiatry and drew up an assessment of professional practices with regard to polypharmacy in geriatric psychiatry.

Evaluating patients' comprehensibility of a standardized medication plan.

PURPOSE: A standardized medication plan for patients has been developed and recently enacted into German law depicting all medicines taken. It can only increase medication safety if patients use and understand it. We evaluated patients' comprehensibility of the medication plan and analyzed potential variables influencing patients' understanding. METHODS: The medication plan template v2.0 was first tested in N = 40 patients, and the "Evaluation Tool to test the handling of the Medication Plan" (ET-MP) was developed, rating patients' understanding from 0 to 100 %. The cut-off, distinguishing if patients understand the medication plan, was set at 90 %. The ET-MP was then applied to an amended medication plan questioning N = 40 general internal medicine (GIM) and N = 50 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation (SD)) age of the study cohort was 69 ± 13 years, 47 % female. Patients took 8 ± 3 drugs chronically. The CHF patients had a lower level of education compared to the GIM group (p = 0.004). The overall ET-MP score was 82 ± 21 % (GIM 86 ± 19 %, CHF 78 ± 23 %; p = 0.16). Forty-three percent achieved a score >90 %. A moderate correlation was found between the ET-MP score and the level of education (r = 0.45) and age (r = -0.46), respectively (both p < 0.001). Cognitively impaired CHF patients (p = 0.03) and patients with advanced CHF (p = 0.006) achieved a lower ET-MP score. In the CHF cohort, signs of depression or a lower level of self-care behaviour were not associated with a lower ET-MP score. CONCLUSION: The ET-MP is suitable to explore patients' understanding of a medication plan. Less than 50 % of the patients reached a score above 90 %. Higher age and lower level of education but not the diagnosis of CHF seem to correlate with impaired understanding of the standardized medication plan. In addition to a medication plan, a significant number of patients are in need of further and continuous care to improve medication safety.

Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) - study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety and efficacy can be influenced by pharmacogenetic factors. Evidence-based recommendations concerning drug-gene-combinations have been issued by international consortia and in drug labels. However, clinical benefit of providing information on individual patient factors in a comprehensive risk assessment aiming to reduce the occurrence and severity of adverse drug reactions is not evident. Purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of a concise individual risk information leaflet with standard information on risk factors for side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial was designed as a prospective, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pragmatic study. 960 elderly, multimorbid outpatients in general medicine are included if they take at least one high risk and one other long-term drug (polymedication). As high risk "index drugs" oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets were chosen because of their specific, objectively assessable side effects. Following randomization, test group patients receive an individualized risk assessment leaflet evaluating their personal data concerning bleeding- and thromboembolic-risk-scores, potential drug-drug-interactions, age, renal function and pharmacogenetic factors. Control group patients obtain a standardized leaflet only containing general information on these criteria. Follow-up period is 9 months for each patient. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of a thromboembolic/bleeding event or death. Secondary endpoints are other adverse drug reactions, hospital admissions, specialist referrals and medication changes due to adverse drug reactions, the patients' adherence to medication regimen as well as health related quality of life, mortality and resulting costs. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive evidence of risk factors for adverse drug reactions, there are few prospective trial data about an individualized risk assessment including pharmacogenetic information to increase patient safety. By conducting a health economic analysis, we will evaluate if the application of an individualized drug therapy in daily routine is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00006256 , date of registration 09/01/15.

[Inappropriate prescribing in polymedicated patients over 64 years-old in primary care]. / Prescripción inadecuada en pacientes polimedicados mayores de 64 años en atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To describe inappropriate prescribing (IP) in the polymedicated population over 64 years-old in primary care using the STOPP/START criteria. DESIGN: The study design was descriptive, cross-sectional and multicenter. LOCATION: Four urban primary care centers in Barcelona. Participants Patients over 64 years-old with more than 5 prescribed drugs for at least 6 months (n=467). Main measurements Major health problems, chronically prescribed drugs, and percentage of IP using the STOPP/START criteria were studied. Percentage of IP considered as the percentage of patients with at least one STOPP or START non-compliance criterion was calculated with a 95%CI. Chi-square was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 77.3 (± 7.0 SD) with a mean of 8.9 (± 2.8 SD) prescribed drugs. IP was higher the greater the number of drugs prescribed (p<0,01). 326 patients (76.4% [95%CI: 72.2 to 80.6]) had at least one IP, according to STOPP/START criteria. STOPP IP affected 51.4% of the patients and START IP 53.6%. The most frequent causes of IP were antiplatelet agents, for both over-prescribing (10.2%) and omission (17.9%). Prolonged use of benzodiazepines (6.6%) and duplications (6.4%) followed in prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: IP in polymedicated patients in primary care was very high. IP was similar for drugs that should be withdrawn or started. The most common causes of IP were antiplatelet agents, benzodiazepines and drug duplication.

Evaluation of deprescription by general practitioners in elderly people with different levels of dependence: cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is easily achieved in elderly patients with multimorbidity and it is associated with a higher risk of potentially inappropriate medication use and worse health outcomes. Studies have shown that deprescription is safe, however, some barriers have been identified. The aim of this study was to analyse Portuguese General Practitioners (GP) deprescription's attitudes using clinical vignettes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using an online survey with 3 sections: demographic and professional characterization; two clinical vignettes with an elderly patient with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in which the dependency level varies; barriers and factors influencing deprescription. Frequencies, means, and standard deviations were calculated to describe the GPs. Analysis of the deprescription attitude, globally and for each drug, for each clinical vignette applying the McNeemar's test. RESULTS: A sample of 396 GP was obtained with a mean age of 38 years, most of them female. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed in deprescribing according to the patient dependency level, with more GPs (80.4% versus 75.3%) deprescribing in the most dependent patient. A statistically significant difference was found for all drugs except for antihypertensive drugs. All medications were deprescribed more often in dependent patients except for anti-dementia drugs. More than 70% of the participants considered life expectancy and quality of life as "very important" factors for deprescription and more than 90% classified the existence of guidelines and the risks and benefits of medication as "very important" or "important". In the open question, the factors most reported by the GP were those related to the patient (52,9%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study on this topic carried out in Portugal using clinical vignettes, with a representative sample of Portuguese GP. The level of dependence significatively influenced the deprescription attitude of Portuguese GPs. The majority of the GPs classified the quality of life, life expectancies, potential negative effects and the existence of guidelines as "very important" or "important" while deprescribing. It is important to develop and test deprescribing in real life studies to analyze if these attitudes are the same in daily practice.

Strategies to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Polymedicated Patients over 65 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Part of the population over 65 years of age suffer from several pathologies and are therefore polymedicated. In this systematic review and metanalysis, we aimed to determine the efficacy of several strategies developed to improve adherence to pharmacological treatment in polymedicated elderly people. DESIGN: Web Of Science, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched until 2 January 2024. In total, 17 of the 1508 articles found evaluated the efficacy of interventions to improve adherence to medication in polymedicated elderly patients. Methodological quality and the risk of bias were rated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Open Meta Analyst® software was used to create forest plots of the meta-analysis. RESULTS: In 11 of the 17 studies, an improvement in adherence was observed through the use of different measurement tools and sometimes in combination. The most frequently used strategy was using instructions and counselling, always in combination, in a single strategy used to improve adherence; one involved the use of medication packs and the other patient follow-up. In both cases, the results in improving adherence were positive. Five studies using follow-up interventions via visits and phone calls showed improved adherence on the Morisky Green scale compared to those where usual care was received [OR = 1.900; 95% CI = 1.104-3.270] (p = 0.021). DISCUSSION: There is a high degree of heterogeneity in the studies analyzed, both in the interventions used and in the measurement tools for improving adherence to treatment. Therefore, we cannot make conclusions about the most efficacious strategy to improve medication adherence in polymedicated elderly patients until more evidence of single-intervention strategies is available.

Primary care pharmacist-led medication review in older adult patients in coordination with general practitioners: an observational retrospective cohorts study.

Background: Polypharmacy and risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older adult are being continuously increased. Including a primary care pharmacist (PCP) in the healthcare team is associated with lower rates of medication-related problems (MRPs). Objectives: To determine the impact (in terms of variation of PIP, MRPs and polymedication) of treatment reviews (TR) carried out by the PCP by comparing two cohorts: standard TR vs coordinated TR with prescribing General Practitioners (GP). To assess possible health outcomes in both groups 6 months post-TR. Methods: This is an observational study of two retrospective cohorts (2018 to 2020). All patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed. Patients ≥65 years, who underwent complete TR by the PCP were included. Patients in a situation of exitus at the time of TR and those who underwent a partial TR were excluded. Control group cohort consisted of patients who underwent standard TR, and intervention group cohort consisted of those who underwent TR coordinated with GP. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were analyzed. Results: 181 patients were enrolled. Mean age 84.4 ± 7.2 years, 78.5% women. Variables (GP-coordinated vs standard TRs) pre-post: decrease in drugs/patient 1.9 (95%CI: 1.4-2.4) vs 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2-1.3), p < 0.05; decrease in MRPs/patient 3.1 (95%CI: 2.8-3.4) vs 1.0 (95%CI: 0.6-1.4), p < 0.05; decrease in PIP/patient 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6-2.2) vs 0.6 (95% CI: 0.2-0.9), p < 0.05. Health outcomes: there was significant difference in average primary-care visits/patient 1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.2 ± 1.8, p < 0.05. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary interventions between PCP and GP, together with a systematic approach to TR can improve the quality of pharmacotherapy in the elderly. Prospective large follow-up studies are needed to demonstrate a positive trend in health outcomes.

[Older patients and injectable anticancer drug: Feasibility study of the implementation of pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics in a hospital center]. / Patients âgés et anticancéreux injectables : étude de faisabilité de la mise en place d'entretiens pharmaceutiques d'oncogériatrie dans un centre hospitalier.

INTRODUCTION: In our establishment, pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics have been developed to reduce drug iatrogenesis. The target patients were older patients (≥65years) with polypharmacy and/or identified at risk of frailty (G8≤14), starting an injectable cancer protocol. METHODS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics over a period of six months. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients benefited from a pharmaceutical interview in oncogeriatrics (median age 76 years; 21 patients with G8≤14). Two-thirds of the patients met other interveners during patient care, 4 of whom after referral by the pharmacist. As for medication reviews: 93% of patients required pharmaceutical intervention (average of 3.5 per patient). The majority proposed therapeutic follow-ups and discontinuations of treatment. According to their evaluation by a pharmacist/oncologist pair, 97% of pharmaceutical interventions would have a positive clinical impact, of which 13 % a major clinical impact. The main drug classes concerned by the pharmaceutical interventions were analgesics, drugs used in diabetes and psycholeptics. Among the four pharmaceutical interventions with major clinical impact, nine proposed the optimization of analgesic treatment. DISCUSSION: The implementation of these interviews allowed us to initiate the creation of a care pathway dedicated to older patients identified as fragile. The pharmaceutical care offered appear to provide added value in the care of these patients. Organizational changes are necessary to promote multidisciplinarity and improve our practices in oncogeriatrics.

Italian Real-World Analysis of the Impact of Polypharmacy and Aging on the Risk of Multiple Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in HCV Patients Treated with Pangenotypic Direct-Acting Antivirals (pDAA).

Purpose: The study aims at investigating the impact of polymedication and aging in the prevalence of multiple drug-drug interactions (DDIs) on HCV patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB). Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis based on administrative data covering around 6.9 million individuals. Patients treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB over November 2017-March 2020 were included. Index date corresponded to SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB first prescription during such period; patients were followed up for treatment duration. Analyses were then focused on patients with ≥2 comedications at risk of multiple DDIs. The severity and the effect of multiple DDI were identified using the Liverpool University tool. Results: A total of 2057 patients with SOF/VEL and 2128 with GLE/PIB were selected. Mean age of SOF/VEL patients was 58.5 years, higher than GLE/PIB ones (52.5 years) (p < 0.001), and patients >50 years were more present in SOF/VEL vs GLE/PIB cohorts: 72% vs 58%, (p < 0.001). Most prescribed co-medications were cardiovascular, alimentary and nervous system drugs. Proportion of patients with ≥2 comedications was higher in SOF/VEL compared to GLE/PIB cohort (56.5% vs 32.3%, p < 0.001). Those at high-risk of multiple DDIs accounted for 11.6% (N = 135) of SOF/VEL and 19.6% (N = 135) of GLE/PIB (p < 0.001) patients with ≥2 comedications. Among them, the potential effect of DDI was a decrease of DAA serum levels (11% of SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB patients) and an increased concentration of comedication serum levels (14% of SOF/VEL and 42% of GLE/PIB patients). Conclusion: This real-world analysis provided a thorough characterization on the burden of polymedication regimens in HCV patients treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB that expose such patients to an increased risk of DDIs. In our sample population, SOF/VEL regimen was more frequently detected on elderly patients and on those with ≥2 comedications at risk of multi-DDI, ie, among patients characterized by higher rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy.

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions According to the New STOPP/START Criteria in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.

The demand for long-term care is expected to increase due to the rising life expectancy and the increased prevalence of long-term illnesses. Nursing home residents are at an increased risk of suffering adverse drug events due to inadequate prescriptions. The main objective of this systematic review is to collect and analyze the prevalence of potentially inadequate prescriptions based on the new version of STOPP/START criteria in this specific population. Databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane) were searched for inappropriate prescription use in nursing homes according to the second version of STOPP/START criteria. The risk of bias was assessed with the STROBE checklist. A total of 35 articles were assessed for eligibility. One hundred and forty nursing homes and more than 6900 residents were evaluated through the analysis of 13 studies of the last eight years. The reviewed literature returned prevalence ranges between 67.8% and 87.7% according to the STOPP criteria, according to START criteria prevalence ranged from 39.5% to 99.7%. The main factors associated with the presence of inappropriate prescriptions were age, comorbidities, and polypharmacy. These data highlight that, although the STOPP/START criteria were initially developed for community-dwelling older adults, its use in nursing homes may be a starting point to help detect more efficiently inappropriate prescriptions in institutionalized patients. We hope that this review will help to draw attention to the need for medication monitoring systems in this vulnerable population.