Spontaneous intracranial hypotension mimicking iatrogenic spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

OBJECTIVE: To raise awareness that patients with persistent post-dural puncture headache should be considered for evaluation of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) due to a spinal CSF leak may occur following more-or-less trivial traumatic events. We report our experience with spontaneous spinal CSF leaks that occur following percutaneous or open spine procedures, a potential source of diagnostic confusion. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, using a prospectively maintained database of patients with SIH, we identified all new patients evaluated between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, who were referred for evaluation of an iatrogenic spinal CSF leak but were found to have a spontaneous spinal CSF leak. RESULTS: Nine (4%) of the 248 patients with SIH were originally referred for evaluation of an iatrogenic spinal CSF leak. The spinal procedures included epidural steroid injections, laminectomies, epidural anesthesia, and lumbar puncture. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed changes in intracranial hypotension in seven of the nine patients (78%). The spontaneous CSF leak was found to be at least five levels removed from the spinal procedure in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: A spontaneous spinal CSF leak should be suspected in patients with recalcitrant orthostatic headaches following a spinal procedure, even if symptoms of the leak occur within hours of the spinal procedure and especially if brain MRI is abnormal.

Pediatric post-dural puncture headache and paraplegia.

A cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak developed in a 14-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy following a diagnostic lumbar puncture. Two days and sixteen years later, respectively, paraplegia developed due to a functional disorder. Imaging revealed an extensive extradural CSF collection in both patients and digital subtraction myelography was required to pinpoint the exact site of a ventral dural puncture hole where the lumbar spinal needle had gone "through and through" the dural sac. The CSF leak was complicated by cortical vein thrombosis in one patient. Both patients underwent uneventful surgical repair of the ventral dural puncture hole with prompt resolution of the paraplegia. Iatrogenic ventral CSF leaks may become exceptionally long standing and may be complicated by paraplegia on a functional basis both in the acute and chronic phases.

Diagnostic and therapeutic insights in individuals with persistent post-dural puncture headache: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication following lumbar puncture, epidural analgesia, or neuraxial anesthesia. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition categorizes PDPH as a self-limiting condition; however, emerging evidence, including our findings, suggests that PDPH can have a prolonged course, challenging this traditional view. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the diagnostic characteristics and treatment outcomes of persistent PDPH (pPDPH), offering insights into its demographic profiles and diagnostic features. METHODS: We executed an anonymous, web-based survey targeting individuals aged ≥18 years diagnosed with or suspected of having pPDPH. Recruitment occurred through self-help groups on Facebook. The survey comprised questions regarding diagnostic procedures, treatment regimens, outcomes, and healthcare consultation. RESULTS: The survey achieved a response rate of 179/347 (51.6%) individuals completing the questionnaire. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were confirmed in nine of 179 (5.0%) cases. Signs of intracranial hypotension without a CSF leak were observed in 70/179 (39.1%) individuals. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain and spine, with computed tomography myelography performed in 113/179 (63.1%) cases. Medications, including analgesics, theophylline, and gabapentin, provided minimal short-term relief. Epidural blood patch treatments resulted in slight-to-moderate short-term improvement in 136/179 (76.0%), significant improvement in 22/179 (12.3%), and complete effectiveness in eight of 179 (4.5%) individuals. For long-term outcomes, slight-to-moderate improvement was reported by 118/179 (66.0%) individuals. Surgical interventions were carried out in 42/179 (23.5%) patients, revealing pseudomeningoceles intraoperatively in 20/42 (47.6%) individuals. After surgery, 21/42 (50.0%) of the participants experienced slight-to-moderate improvement, 12/42 (28.6%) showed more pronounced improvement, and five of the 42 (11.9%) achieved complete effectiveness. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the complexities of managing pPDPH. The delay in diagnosis can impact the effectiveness of treatments, including epidural blood patch and surgical interventions, resulting in ongoing symptoms. This underscores the importance of tailored and adaptable treatment strategies. The findings advocate for additional research to deepen the understanding of pPDPH and improve long-term patient outcomes.

Management of Post Dural Puncture Headache During Spinal Cord Stimulation Trials: A Review of Current Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to evaluate, discuss and explain the current literature regarding management of post dural puncture headaches (PDPH) during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials. RECENT FINDINGS: Although an epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard in treatment of PDPH, current literature describes other modalities including various peripheral nerve blocks and pharmacological treatments to reduce PDPH symptoms. PDPH management in SCS centers around conservative treatment and EBP. It has been shown that some practitioners choose prophylactic measures and/or an EBP at the time of the lead placement. Recent literature regarding obstetric anesthesia related PDPH management has included newer potential modalities for addressing symptom improvement that can also be applied to PDPH from SCS trial dural punctures. Due to limited data overall, further studies are needed to effectively provide a guideline on optimal treatment protocols for PDPH after dural puncture in SCS trials.

Lumbar Puncture Complications: A Review of Current Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews the complications of lumbar puncture with a focus on post-dural puncture headache including pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has focused on understanding the multifactorial mechanisms of post-dural puncture headache and improving prevention and treatment strategies. Small caliber, pencil-point type needles are encouraged to minimize the risk of post-dural puncture headaches, especially in populations that are at higher risk for complication. While new medications and procedures show promise in small cohorts, conservative medical management and epidural blood patch are still the first and second-line treatments for PDPH. Post-dural puncture headache is the most frequent complication of lumbar puncture. There are both modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors to consider when performing this procedure. Conservative medical management and procedure-based therapies exist for when complications of lumbar puncture arise.

Headache that will not go away...Third ED visit is the charm?

Subdural hematoma is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia or diagnostic lumbar puncture. Headache is a common complaint for patients with either a subdural hematoma or a post-dural puncture headache. Because post-dural puncture headaches are commonly seen in the Emergency Department, the potential to miss more serious pathology arises. We present the case of a young female who suffered bilateral subdural hematomas following epidural analgesia during childbirth. She presented twice to the Emergency Department and was treated for a post-dural puncture headache before computed tomography imaging revealed the diagnosis on the third Emergency Department encounter. This case highlights the importance of exploring all potential diagnoses when a patient presents with a headache after either epidural analgesia or a diagnostic lumbar puncture, especially if the patient returns after unsuccessful treatment for a presumptive post-dural puncture headache.

Sphenopalatine ganglion blocks for post-dural puncture headache: A case report in a 3-year-old child.

Post-dural puncture headache is a distressing complication that may occur after lumbar puncture or unintentional dural puncture. Risk factors in the pediatric population have not been well elicited, and the true incidence is unknown. Conservative management includes conservative physical measures and medical therapies. Epidural blood patch remains the gold standard for managing severe refractory headache, but greater occipital nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion blocks have been used with success. Sphenopalatine ganglion blocks are easy to perform, minimally invasive and, in the postoperative setting where epidural analgesia is utilized, provide an alternative that should be considered.

Paramedian versus midline approach of spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: Midline approach of spinal anesthesia has been widely used for patients undergoing surgical procedures. However, it might not be effective for obstetric patients and elderly with degenerative spine changes. Primary objective was to examine the success rate at the first attempt between the paramedian and midline spinal anesthesia in adults undergoing surgery. METHODS: Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from their starting date until February 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the paramedian versus midline approach of spinal anesthesia were included. The primary outcome was the success rate at the first attempt of spinal anesthesia. RESULTS: Our review included 36 RCTs (n = 5379). Compared to the midline approach, paramedian approach may increase success rate at the first attempt but the evidence is very uncertain (OR: 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.82, ρ = 0.007, level of evidence:very low). Our pooled data indicates that the paramedian approach likely reduced incidence of post-spinal headache (OR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.51-2.84, ρ < 0.00001, level of evidence:moderate). The evidence suggests that the paramedian approach may result in a reduction in the occurrence of paresthesia (OR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.06-2.45, ρ = 0.03, level of evidence:low). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis of 36 RCTs showed that paramedian approach may result in little to no difference in success rate at the first attempt owing to its very low level of evidence. However, given the low level of evidence and studies with small sample sizes, these findings need to be interpreted with caveat. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023397781.

Comparison of the Effect of Landmark-Based Midline and Paramedian Approaches on Spinal Anesthesia-Related Complications in Adult Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background and Objectives: Spinal anesthesia is widely used in various types of surgery. However, several complications can occur afterward. This study aimed to identify differences in the incidence of anesthesia-related complications according to the approach methods (midline versus paramedian) for landmark-based spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science, for eligible randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) incidence, and secondary outcomes were low back pain (LBP) incidence and success rate in the first trial of spinal anesthesia. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 2280 patients from 13 randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis. The incidence rates of PDPH were 5.9% and 10.4% in the paramedian and midline approach groups, respectively. The pooled effect size revealed that the incidence of PDPH (OR: 0.43, 95% CI [0.22-0.83]; p = 0.01; I2 = 53%) and LBP (OR: 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.44]; p < 0.001; I2 = 16%) decreased, and the success rate in the first attempt was higher (OR: 2.30, 95% CI [1.36-3.87]; p = 0.002; I2 = 35%) with the paramedian than with the midline approach. Conclusions: Paramedian spinal anesthesia reduced PDPH and LBP and increased the success rate of the first attempt.

Post-dural puncture headache combined with pneumocephalus secondary to vaginal delivery following epidural anesthesia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocephalus is rare in vaginal deliveries. Pneumocephalus may be asymptomatic or present with signs of increased intracranial pressure. However, parturients who received epidural anesthesia with air in their brains may experience low intracranial pressure headaches after giving birth, causing the diagnosis of pneumocephalus to be delayed. We report a case of a parturient who developed post-dural puncture headache combined with pneumocephalus secondary to vaginal delivery following epidural anesthesia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 24-year-old G1P0 Chinese woman at 38 weeks gestation was in labor and received epidural anesthesia using the loss of resistance to air technique and had a negative prior medical history. She presented with postural headache, neck stiffness and auditory changes 2 h after vaginal delivery. The head non-contrast computed tomography revealed distributed gas density shadows in the brain, indicating pneumocephalus. Her headache was relieved by bed rest, rehydration, analgesia, and oxygen therapy and completely disappeared after 2 weeks of postpartum bed rest. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that positional headaches after epidural anesthesia may not indicate low intracranial pressure alone; it may combine with pneumocephalus, particularly when using the loss of resistance to air technique. At this moment, head computed tomography is essential to discover other conditions like pneumocephalus.

Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for preventing post-dural puncture headaches in obstetric patients: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major complication of neuraxial anesthesia. PDPH usually occurs after Caesarean section in obstetric patients. The efficacy of prophylactic pharmacological therapies remains controversial. METHODS: Seven pharmacological therapies (aminophylline (AMP), dexamethasone, gabapentin/pregabalin (GBP/PGB), hydrocortisone, magnesium, ondansetron (OND), and propofol (PPF)), were studied in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of PDPH within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PDPH at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, the severity of headache in PDPH patients (24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). RESULTS: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with 4,921 pregnant women (2,723 parturients received prophylactic pharmacological therapies) were included. The analyses demonstrated that PPF, OND, and AMP were efficient in decreasing the cumulative incidence of PDPH during the follow-up period compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.70; OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.87; OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.84, respectively). PPF and OND had the lower incidence of PONV compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.30; and OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.63). No significant difference in other outcomes was found among different therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available data, PPF, OND, and AMP may have better efficacy in decreasing the incidence of PDPH compared to the placebo group. No significant side effects were revealed. Better-designed studies are requested to verify these conclusions.

An unexpected effect of traumatic and bloody lumbar puncture among patients with primary headaches in emergency department.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association between traumatic tap and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following lumbar puncture (LP) among patients who underwent LP with a primary discharge diagnosis of primary headache in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who visited a single tertiary ED with the symptom of a headache and underwent LP for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis between January 2012 and January 2022. Patients who met the definition of PDPH and revisited the ED or outpatient clinic within 2 weeks of discharge were included. For comparative analysis, we divided the groups according to CSF RBC counts (group 1, CSF RBC <10 cells/µL; group 2, 10-100 cells/µL; group 3, ≥100 cells/µL). The primary outcome was the difference in CSF RBC counts between the ED or outpatient clinic revisiting patients who underwent LP within 2 weeks after discharge from the ED. The secondary outcomes were the admission rate and risk factors for PDPH; sex, age, needle size, and CSF pressure. RESULTS: Data from 112 patients were collected; PDPH was reported in 39 patients (34.8%), and 40 (35.7%) patients were admitted. The median (interquartile range) CSF RBC count was 10 [2-100.8] cells/µL. One-way analysis of variance test of the mean differences among the three groups showed no differences in age, the duration of headache before LP, PLT counts, PT, or aPTT among the groups. There were differences in the number of admitted patients (30 vs. 7 vs. 3, P < 0.001) and the incidence of PDPH (29 vs. 6 vs. 4, P < 0.003). In the comparison of the PDPH and non-PDPH groups, there were differences in age (28.7 ± 8.4 years vs. 36.9 ± 18.4 years, P = 0.01) and the admission rate (85% vs. 9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Notably, our results suggest that traumatic LP may be an unexpected factor in reducing the occurrence rate of PDPH. Consequently, the admission rate for PDPH was significantly reduced among patients with traumatic LP and those with primary headaches. In this study, we collected and analyzed the data from a relatively small sample size of 112 patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between traumatic LP and PDPH.

Caffeine - Essentials for anaesthesiologists: A narrative review.

Caffeine has a multitude of uses in anaesthesia, and numerous studies have evaluated its efficacy and usefulness in various aspects of anaesthesia and medical practice. Its various applications in anaesthesia include its role in awakening from anaesthesia, managing post-dural puncture headache, managing post-sedation paradoxical hyper-activity in children, post-operative bowel paralysis, and apnoea in paediatric populations, that is, apnoea in infancy, paediatric obstructive apnoea, and post-anaesthetic apnoea in pre-mature infants. Though the effects of caffeine on bronchial smooth muscle, neurological, and cardio-vascular systems are well known, the relatively little-known effects on the endocrine and gastro-intestinal (GI) system have been recently taking primacy for eliciting its therapeutic benefits. The literature shows encouraging evidence in favour of caffeine, but unambiguous evidence of caffeine benefits for patients is lacking and needs further investigation. In this narrative review of literature, we summarise the available literature to provide insights into the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical application of caffeine in modern anaesthetic practice, and evidence available in this field to date. An awareness of the various physiological effects, adverse effects, reported applications, and their evidence will widen the horizon for anaesthesiologists to increase its rational use and advance research in this field. Well-designed randomised controlled trials regarding the various outcomes related to caffeine use in anaesthesia should be planned to generate sound evidence and formulate recommendations to guide clinicians.

Post-dural puncture headache: a prospective study on incidence, risk factors, and clinical characterization of 285 consecutive procedures.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is a common and relatively safe neurological procedure. It can be complicated by post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this study is to identify the incidence, risk factors and clinical characterization of PDPH in the inpatient setting of the main tertiary neurology hospital in Kuwait. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study that included patients who were admitted to neurology department at Ibn Sina hospital, Kuwait, from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020, on whom, LP was performed for diagnostic and/or therapeutic reasons. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between PDPH and different clinical parameters. RESULTS: A total of 285 patients were included; 225 females (78.9%), mean age of 32.9 ± 11.7 years. PDPH was reported by 84 patients (29.5%), with mean headache onset of 1.7 ± 0.8 days, and mean duration of 2.4 ± 2.1 days. The commonest headache type was dull aching in 49 patients (58.3%). Headache severity was mild to moderate in 64 patients (76.2%), with mean NRS of 4.1 ± 0.9. Most PDPH (99.3%) resolved with conservative medical management, with only 2 patients (0.7%) requiring epidural blood patch. In multivariate logistic regression model, there was a statistically significant correlation between development of PDPH and young age (p = 0.001), female gender (p = 0 .001), low BMI (p < 0 .001), pre-LP headache (p = 0.001), history of previous PDPH (p = 0.001), and number of LP attempts (p < 0.001). PDPH was statistically significantly higher in patients with optic neuritis (p = 0.009), and cerebral venous thrombosis (p = 0.007), and lower in patients with peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.011) and spinal muscular atrophy (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from clinical practice in the main tertiary neurology hospital in Kuwait were in line with literature findings. Younger age, female gender, lower BMI, pre-procedural headache, previous history of PDPH, and number of LP attempts were found to be independent risk factors for developing PDPH. To our knowledge, this study represents the first comprehensive description of PDPH in a population from the Arabian Gulf Region.

Intracranial hypotension as a contributor to isolated cortical vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Isolated cortical vein thrombosis (ICVT), a rare type of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), is diagnostically challenging in some cases, and intracranial hypotension (IH) is known to cause CVT. METHODS: In this study, we reviewed the clinical and imaging characteristics of ICVT in patients with IH caused by spinal cerebrospinal fluid leakage, based on a literature review and investigation of cases from our hospital. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2007, and November 1, 2019, 735 patients were diagnosed with IH at our hospital; three patients developed ICVT (incidence ~ 0.4%, 3/735), and the literature review yielded an additional 23 cases. Therefore, 26 patients (mean age 35.9 ± 11.4 years old) were included in this study. The most common symptoms were headache (100.0%, 26/26), focal neurological deficits (53.8%, 14/26), and seizure (34.6%, 9/26). The initial headache was orthostatic in 96.2% (25/26) of patients, and 38.5% (10/26) of patients reported a change in the headache pattern following diagnosis of ICVT. Neuroimaging findings associated with ICVT included the cord sign (61.5%, 16/26) and parenchymal brain lesions (46.2%, 12/26), such as intracerebral hemorrhage (30.8%, 8/26), hemorrhagic infarcts (11.5%, 3/26), and localized edema (11.5%, 3/26). The percentage of patients who received anticoagulation and epidural blood patch therapy was similar (69.2% [18/26] vs. 65.4% [17/26]), and most patients recovered completely (92.3%, 24/26). CONCLUSION: IH should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with ICVT. Knowledge of the relevant clinical and neuroimaging features is important to facilitate early diagnosis for favorable prognosis.

Chronic headaches related to post-dural puncture headaches: a scoping review.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-recognised complication of neuraxial procedures. Although it is generally considered to be self-limiting, there is mounting evidence suggesting an association between PDPH and chronic headaches. In this review, chronic headache after dural puncture was defined as the reporting of persistent headaches more than 1 month after the index dural puncture. This scoping review aims to: (1) review the relationship between PDPH and chronic headaches, (2) explore the pathophysiology of chronic headache arising from a dural puncture, and (3) make recommendations about the follow-up and treatment of these patients. The pooled relative risk of chronic headache from 15 863 patients reported in 12 cohort studies in patients with an accidental dural puncture compared with those without accidental dural puncture were 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9), 2.5 (95% CI, 2.0-3.2), and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.9-7.1) at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. We also identified 20 case reports of 49 patients who developed chronic headache after a dural puncture. Epidural blood patch and fibrin glue injection and surgery have been used to treat chronic postural headaches. Overall, the level of evidence is low for all reported outcomes (aetiology, intervention and outcome) by virtue of the type of studies available (cohort and case reports) and significant risk of bias in the cohort studies. Based on findings from this review, we recommend that the risk of chronic headache is included in the informed consent discussion for all neuraxial procedures. Patients with PDPH should be closely followed up after hospital discharge.

Factors associated with failed epidural blood patch after accidental dural puncture in obstetrics: a prospective, multicentre, international cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patch is commonly used for management of post-dural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture. The primary aim was to determine factors associated with failed epidural blood patch. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, international cohort study, parturients ≥18 yr receiving an epidural blood patch for treatment of post-dural puncture headache were included. Failed epidural blood patch was defined as headache intensity numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≥7 in the upright position at 4, 24, or 48 h, or the need for a second epidural blood patch, and complete success by NRS=0 at 0-48 h after epidural blood patch. All others were considered partial success. Multinominal logistic regression was used for statistical analyses with P<0.01 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In all, 643 women received an epidural blood patch. Complete data to classify failure were available in 591 (91.9%) women. Failed epidural blood patch occurred in 167 (28.3%) patients; 195 (33.0%) were completely successful and 229 (38.7%) partially successful. A total of 126 women (19.8%) received a second epidural blood patch. A statistically significant association with failure was observed in patients with a history of migraine, when the accidental dural puncture occurred between lumbar levels L1/L3 compared with L3/L5 and when epidural blood patch was performed <48 h compared with ≥48 h after accidental dural puncture. In patients having radiological investigations, three intracranial bleeds were diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Failed epidural blood patch occurred in 28.3% of women. Independent modifiable factors associated with failure were higher lumbar level of accidental dural puncture and short interval between accidental dural puncture and epidural blood patch. A history of migraine was associated with a higher risk of second epidural blood patch. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02362828.

Co-Presentation of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Patient with Post-Dural Puncture Headache.

INTRODUCTION: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-known complication of neuraxial anesthesia, but the occurrence of seizures and vision loss within a few days after dural puncture could be alarming. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is associated with reversible edema and leukoencephalopathy in the posterior parieto-occipital cortex. We report the co-presentation of PRES and PDPH after labor epidural analgesia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old multiparous African-American woman was admitted for evaluation of new-onset seizures and headache in the postpartum period. She had a recent history of multiple needle insertion attempts and inadvertent dural puncture during epidural analgesia for delivery. Soon after delivery, she was diagnosed with PDPH and was treated with an epidural blood patch, with no relief of symptoms. Six days later, she developed sudden-onset transient blindness, seizures, and altered sensorium, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed white matter changes suggestive of PRES. CONCLUSION: PRES is an uncommon complication of cerebrospinal fluid leak and intracranial hypotension. We report the occurrence of PRES in a patient with no known risk factors except a traumatic dural tap. Is it important to expand the differentials for headache after dural puncture to encompass PRES as a possibility, especially in patients with a delayed presentation of seizures and cortical blindness.

Recognized and unrecognized dural punctures in 12,981 labor epidurals: an audit of management.

PURPOSE: Unintentional dural puncture (DP) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) continue to cause discomfort and disability in a small proportion of post-partum women. We report an audit of the management of recognized and unrecognized DP over 10 years. METHODS: Clinical data were prospectively collected for women who experienced a recognized DP or developed symptoms following a neuraxial procedure. Details were documented regarding patient characteristics, the neuraxial procedure, symptoms reported, and epidural blood patches. We reported rates of recognized DP, unrecognized DP, PDPH, and blood patches performed. Data were presented as number (percent) and proportions of interest compared using Chi square analysis. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2018, 12,981 women utilized labor epidural analgesia. A recognized DP occurred in 131 (1.0%) and an unrecognized DP in 60 (0.5%), with unrecognized DPs comprising 31% of the total. Of 131 recognized punctures, 86 (66%) developed a PDPH. A total of 146 (1.1%) women experienced a PDPH. Of those, a blood patch was performed in 93 (64%). Intrathecal catheters were inserted for > 24 h in 43 (33%) women with a recognized DP. Of those, 33 (77%) developed a PDPH, compared to 53 (60%) of those without an intrathecal catheter in situ for > 24 h (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of DP were consistent with those reported by others. Unrecognized DP comprised a third of all DP, and systematic post-neuraxial follow-up is essential to identify these women. Epidural blood patch was performed in most women experiencing symptoms of PDPH.

SAFETY OF USING DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AS A METHOD OF LABOR ANALGESIA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of complications and side effects of CSE and DPE as a method of analgesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The study included 137 patients who had a vaginal birth using one of two, CSE or DPE methods of analgesia. All of them were divided into two groups: Group I - 54 women (DPE group) and Group II - 83 women (CSE group). In group I, an epidural kit with a Tuohy G18 needle, G20 catheter, and a Whitacre G25 x 120 mm spinal needle was passed through the epidural needle for puncture of dura mater and removed after cerebrospinal fluid receiving, the epidural catheter was conducted on 3-4 cm. The initial dose of anesthetic was: 3 ml of Naropin 0.12% - test dose and 17 ml of working solution (Naropin 0.12% + Fentanyl 2 µg / ml) - main dose. In group II, a spinal-epidural kit with Tuohy G18 needle, catheter G20, spinal needle "Whitacre" G27 x 132 mm for dura mater puncture was used. Bupivacaine 1.5 mg + Fentanyl 15 mcg, 1 ml solution was administered spinally. To maintain analgesia in both groups - the patient-controlled analgesia with a working solution (Naropin 0.12% + Fentanyl 2 µg / ml) with a bolus of 8 - 10 ml, lockout 15 minutes. RESULTS: Results: The higher frequency of hypotension in childbirth when using CSE - 4 women (4.8%) vs 1 woman (1.9%) in the DPE group. Inadequate or insufficient analgesia in group I was found in 2 women (3.7%), and in group II in 4 women (4.8%). The severity of monolateral block in group I was not high and did not cause significant discomfort in women. The higher incidence of monolateral blockade was in group II, in three cases there was a need for additional anesthesiologist interventions and catheter manipulations. In the CSE group there were two cases (2.4%) of severe itching in women, in group I such an adverse reaction was absent. No complication such as PDPH was documented in either group. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: 1. The use of the DPE technique showed a lower frequency of complications compared to CSE. 2. The use of a G 25 spinal needle for puncture of the dura mater does not lead to an increase in the frequency of PDPH. 3. DPE technique using G25 spinal needles reduces the need for additional manipulations with the epidural catheter to overcome unilateral blockades.