ERCP for the initial management of malignant biliary obstruction - real world data on 596 procedures.

AIMS: To evaluate outcomes of ERCP as first-line management in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) of all causes and stages, reflecting a real-life setting. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients with ERCP as the first-line management of MBO at Oslo University Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome measure was a ≥ 50% decrease from the pre-procedural bilirubin within 30 days after ERCP. Secondary outcome measures were technical success of ERCP, complications and overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients were included, median age 70 years. ASA score was ≥ III in 67% of patients. The most common cancers causing MBO were pancreatic cancer (52%), metastatic lesions (20%) and cholangiocarcinoma (16%). The primary outcome measure was achieved in 62% of patients. With endoscopic access, overall technical success was 80% with 85% for the distal extrahepatic group, 71% for the perihilar, 40% for the intrahepatic and 53% for multiple level MBOs. Reinterventions were performed in 27% of the patients. Complications occurred in 15% of the patients, including post-ERCP pancreatitis in 9%. Most complications were of minor/moderate severity (81%). Overall mortality was 33% within the first 90 days. Patients deceased by the end of the study period (83%) had median survival of 146 days (range 1-2,582 days). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP has a high rate of clinical effect and technical success in the management of both distal extrahepatic and perihilar MBO. Our data indicate that ERCP is a valid option in the first-line management of MBO.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Complications and Their Management Strategies: A "Scoping" Literature Review.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-known procedure with both diagnostic and therapeutic utilities in managing pancreaticobiliary conditions. With the advancements of endoscopic techniques, ERCP has become a relatively safe and effective procedure. However, as ERCP is increasingly being utilized for different advanced techniques, newer complications have been noticed. Post-ERCP complications are known, and mostly include pancreatitis, infection, hemorrhage, and perforation. The risks of these complications vary depending on several factors, such as patient selection, endoscopist's skills, and the difficulties involved during the procedure. This review discusses post-ERCP complications and management strategies with new and evolving concepts.

Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Postcholecystectomy Patients and Its Effect on Post-ERCP Complications.

Background: Due to the increasing use of laparoscopy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and other gallbladder disorders, as well as the ongoing issue of associated biliary tree injuries, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) still holds a significant position in the diagnosis and treatment of postcholecystectomy disorders. In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP with the post-ERCP complications. Methods: Ninety-six patients with a history of cholecystectomy who underwent ERCP between January 2016 and January 2021 at the General Surgery Clinic of the University of Health Sciences Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center were retrospectively evaluated. Patient and procedure-related factors were analyzed statistically through univariate analyses. Results: In the matter of post-ERCP complication status, differences observed in terms of age, body mass index (BMI) values, gender, comorbidities, number of ERCP procedures, and the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP among cases were not statistically significant. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that age, BMI values, gender, comorbidities, ERCP count, and the time between procedures are not significant risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Regardless of the time between surgery and ERCP, the presence of post-ERCP complications is comparable.

Anatomy of Major Duodenal Papilla Influences ERCP Outcomes and Complication Rates: A Single Center Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been one of the most intensely studied endoscopic procedures due to its overall high complication rates when compared to other digestive endoscopy procedures. The safety and outcome of such procedures have been linked to multiple procedure- or patient-related risk factors. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether the morphology of the major duodenal papilla influences the ERCP outcomes and complication rates. METHODS: A total of 322 patients with a native papilla have been included in the study over an eight month period. Morphology of the papilla has been classified into normal papilla and four anatomical variations (Type I-IV). All patients have been prospectively monitored over a 15 day period after ERCP. Procedural outcomes and complication rates have been registered. RESULTS: Morphology of the papilla influences both overall complication rates (95%CI, p = 0.0066) and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates (95%CI, p = 0.01001) in univariate analysis. Type IV papillae have proven to be independent risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in multivariate analysis (OR = 12.176, 95%CI, p = 0.005). Type I papillae have been significantly linked to difficult cannulation (AUC = 0.591, 95%CI, p = 0.008); Conclusions: In the monitored cohort morphology of the major duodenal papilla has significantly influenced both ERCP outcomes and post-procedural complication rates.

Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP-related complications: an analysis of 2,715 cases performed by a single endoscopist.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is now the exclusive endoscopic therapeutic modality for biliary as well as pancreatic diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate patient- and procedure-related risk factors for post-ERCP complications in a large-scale study of procedures performed by a single experienced endoscopist. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study which included a total of 2,715 therapeutic ERCPs enrolled in the final analysis. Potential important patient- and procedure-related risk factors for overall post-ERCP complications, pancreatitis and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) bleeding were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Following the first therapeutic ERCP, 327 patients suffered complications; pancreatitis was observed in 132 (4.9%) patients, hemorrhage in 122 (4.5%) patients, cholangitis in 63 (2.3%) patients, perforation in 3 (0.11%) patients, and basket impaction in 7 (0.26%) patients. History of acute pancreatitis was more common in patients with post-ERCP complications (P<0.001). Female gender, young age (<40 years), periampullary diverticulum, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, metal stent placement, opacification of main pancreatic duct and suprapapillary fistulotomy were not found to be risk factors for overall post-ERCP complications and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Multivariate analysis showed a history of acute pancreatitis, difficult cannulation, needle-knife papillotomy, transpancreatic sphincterotomy, opacification of first and second class pancreatic ductules and acinarization as independent risk factors for overall complications and PEP, whereas antiplatelet and anticoagulation drug use were not found to be independent risk factors for post-ES bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the endoscopist's experience reduces patient- and procedure-related risk factors for post-ERCP complications.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in patients with Periampullary duodenal diverticula (PAD).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Periampullary diverticula (PAD) are found in 9-32% of patients who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). PAD are acquired lesions which are rare in patients <40 years, but increasing with age. Several endoscopic studies have revealed an association between PAD and common bile duct (CBD) stones. The presence of a papilla located in the diverticula is also frequent (6.8-54.9%) and represents a restrictive factor for successful cannulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis has been made of data related to the patients with PAD treated at our GI Unit (small center with low case volume), who underwent ERCP in the period 1st January 2010 to 31st March 2014. For each patient were analyzed data regarding sex, age at diagnosis, indication to ERCP, cannulation rate, endoscopic treatment and complications. PAD were classified in 3 different types according to the position of the major papilla. RESULTS: A total of 647 ERCPs have been performed of which 77 (16.5%) in pts with PAD (48 F, 29 M, mean age: 78.3 years; range: 48-95). PAD type I (inside the diverticulum) were found in 22 pts (28.6 %), Type II (in the margin of the diverticulum or between two PADs) in 36 pts (46.7 %) of which 12 cases between two PADs, type III (near the diverticulm) in 19 pts (24.7 %). The indication for ERCP were: 72 CBD stones (93.5%), 3 cholangiocarcinoma (3.9%) and 2 pancreatic head cancer (2.6%). In cases of difficult cannulation, precut was performed in 12 pts (15.6%). Deep CBD cannulation and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) was achieved in 70 cases (90.9%). The other 7 case of failure were all in patients with CBD stones. Complete clearance of CBD stones was achieved in 57 patients (87.7%) (57/65 ERCP/ES). Stent placement was necessary in 8 cases (12.3%) (8/65 ERCP/ES), due to multiple large stones. The adverse events related to ERCP/ES included 4 intraprocedural bleeding (5.7%) (4/70 ERCP/ES) and 1 mild pancreatitis (1.4%) (1/70 ERCP/ES), all managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that ERCP is a safe procedure also in patients with PAD, with a good success rate and low complications.

Post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and its risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex endoscopic technique that evolved from a diagnostic to a mainly therapeutic procedure. This was due to the identification of post-procedural complications that can follow both simple ERCP and that associated with the instrumentation of the biliary and pancreatic ductals. The identification of post ERCP complications in a proportion of 5 to 10% of cases, with a mortality rate of 0.33%, imposed their analysis and study of risk factors involved in their occurrence. The significance of post ERCP complications reveals the necessity of their avoidance by adopting additional measures if risk factors are identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed 900 cases that underwent ERCP in the Surgery Department of "Sf. Ioan" Clinical Hospital in a period of 17 years. The complications of the procedure were studied. Among them, a special attention was given to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (pERCP-AP), the most common complication that occurred in the study group. We also tried to find out and highlight the risk factors for this complication. RESULTS: ERCP is a relatively safe invasive procedure, yet it has complications (8% of cases), some of them potentially fatal (mortality 0.43%). The most common complications after ERCP are acute pancreatitis (3.7%), papillary bleeding (1.04%), retroperitoneal duodenal perforation (0.69%) and biliary septic complications like acute cholecystitis and cholangitis (1.21%). Acute pancreatitis is by far the most common complication. Risk factors for its occurrence are difficult sphincterotomy with precut use, failure of CBD desobstruction, pancreatic sphincterotomy, repeated injection of contrast in the pancreatic ductal system, dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi and the absence of changes of chronic pancreatitis. When risk factors are identified, the patients' selection must be very strict and diagnostic ERCP should be avoided in favor of non-invasive diagnostic methods (MRI-cholangiography, echo-endoscopy).