Health-related quality of life 12 years after injury: prevalence and predictors of outcomes in a cohort of injured Maori.

PURPOSE: Studies have found that many people who sustain an injury can experience adverse outcomes for a considerable time thereafter. Maori, the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa me Te Waipounamu (New Zealand; NZ), are no exception. The Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study (POIS) found that almost three-quarters of Maori participants were experiencing at least one of a range of poor outcomes at two years post-injury. The aim of this paper was to estimate the prevalence, and identify predictors, of adverse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in the POIS-10 Maori cohort, 12 years after participants sustained an injury. METHODS: Interviewers reached 354 individuals who were eligible to participate in a POIS-10 Maori interview, to be conducted a decade after the last phase of POIS interviews (held 24 months post-injury). The outcomes of interest were responses to each of the five EQ-5D-5L dimensions at 12 years post-injury. Potential predictors (i.e., pre-injury sociodemographic and health measures; injury-related factors) were collected from earlier POIS interviews. Additional injury-related information was collected from administrative datasets proximate to the injury event 12 years prior. RESULTS: Predictors of 12-year HRQoL outcomes varied by EQ-5D-5L dimension. The most common predictors across dimensions were pre-injury chronic conditions and pre-injury living arrangements. CONCLUSION: An approach to rehabilitation where health services proactively enquire about, and consider the broader aspects of, patient health and wellbeing throughout the injury recovery process, and effectively coordinate their patients' care with other health and social services where necessary, may help improve long-term HRQoL outcomes for injured Maori.

Predictors of EQ-5D-3L outcomes amongst injured Maori: 1-year post-injury findings from a New Zealand cohort study.

PURPOSE: Maori, the Indigenous population of New Zealand (NZ), are at higher risk of problems with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 12 months following injury. This paper examines pre-injury sociodemographic and health characteristics and injury-related factors, including healthcare access, and their association with HRQoL outcomes 12 months after injury. METHODS: The Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study recruited 2856 injured New Zealanders aged 18-64 years from the entitlement claims register of the country's no-fault injury insurance agency. One-fifth (n = 566) of the cohort were Maori. Information on predictors and outcomes, with the exception of injury and hospitalisation, was obtained directly from participants at approximately 3 and 12 months post-injury. The outcomes of interest were responses to the five dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L and a dichotomous measure obtained by summing scored responses to each question. Modified Poisson regression was used to identify predictors of each outcome at 12 months post-injury. RESULTS: Predictors differed by outcome. Being female, experiencing EQ-5D-3L problems pre-injury, having ≥ 2 chronic conditions pre-injury, perceiving one's injury to be a threat of long-term disability, and having trouble accessing health services for injury were common predictors of EQ-5D-3L problems at 12 months post-injury for Maori. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist to improve HRQoL outcomes by identifying individuals in the early stages of injury recovery who may benefit from further treatment and support.

Comparison of the performance of mental health, drug and alcohol comorbidities based on ICD-10-AM and medical records for predicting 12-month outcomes in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Many outcome studies capture the presence of mental health, drug and alcohol comorbidities from administrative datasets and medical records. How these sources compare as predictors of patient outcomes has not been determined. The purpose of the present study was to compare mental health, drug and alcohol comorbidities based on ICD-10-AM coding and medical record documentation for predicting longer-term outcomes in injured patients. METHODS: A random sample of patients (n = 500) captured by the Victorian State Trauma Registry was selected for the study. Retrospective medical record reviews were conducted to collect data about documented mental health, drug and alcohol comorbidities while ICD-10-AM codes were obtained from routinely collected hospital data. Outcomes at 12-months post-injury were the Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOS-E), European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L), and return to work. Linear and logistic regression models, adjusted for age and gender, using medical record derived comorbidity and ICD-10-AM were compared using measures of calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic) and discrimination (C-statistic and R2). RESULTS: There was no demonstrable difference in predictive performance between the medical record and ICD-10-AM models for predicting the GOS-E, EQ-5D-3L utility sore and EQ-5D-3L mobility, self-care, usual activities and pain/discomfort items. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) for models using medical record derived comorbidity (AUC 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.73) was higher than the model using ICD-10-AM data (AUC 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.67) for predicting the EQ-5D-3L anxiety/depression item. The discrimination of the model for predicting return to work was higher with inclusion of the medical record data (AUC 0.69, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.76) than the ICD-10-AM data (AUC 0.59, 95% CL: 0.52, 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Mental health, drug and alcohol comorbidity information derived from medical record review was not clearly superior for predicting the majority of the outcomes assessed when compared to ICD-10-AM. While information available in medical records may be more comprehensive than in the ICD-10-AM, there appears to be little difference in the discriminative capacity of comorbidities coded in the two sources.

A mixed-methods analysis examining child and family needs following early brain injury.

Purpose:To understand child and family needs following TBI in early childhood, 22 caregivers of children who were hospitalized for a moderate to severe TBI between the ages of 0 and 4 within the past 10 years (M = 3.27 years; Range = 3 months to 8 years) participated in a needs assessment.Methods: Through a convergent study design, including focus groups (FG), key informant interviews (KII), and standardized questionnaires, caregivers discussed challenges and changes in their child's behaviors and functioning in addition to resources that would be helpful post-injury. Standardized questionnaires assessing current psychological distress and parenting stress in addition to open-ended questions about their general experience were completed.Results: Results indicated some families continue to experience unresolved concerns relating to the child's injury, caregiver wellbeing, and the family system after early TBI, including notable variation in caregiver reported psychological distress and parenting stress. Caregivers noted unmet needs post-injury, such as child behavior management and caregiver stress and coping.Conclusion: Early TBI can have a long-term impact on the child, caregivers, and family system. Addressing the needs of the whole family system in intervention and rehabilitation efforts may optimize outcomes following early TBI. Study results will inform intervention development to facilitate post-injury coping and positive parenting.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONEarly TBI can result in unmet needs that have a lingering impact on the child, caregiver, and family.Caregivers need information and resources that address their own distress and stressors related to changes in the child post-injury.Our study suggests that stress management and self-care skills are possible targets of intervention for caregivers of children who experienced an early TBI.