Safety of recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of breakthrough bleeds in patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: Review of the real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab is used as a subcutaneous prophylaxis for prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A (HA) with and without inhibitors. While low bleeding rates were observed in clinical trials, patients still experience breakthrough bleeds (BTBs) with emicizumab in the real-world. Current guidelines recommend use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for treatment of BTBs in patients with inhibitors. Due to thrombotic events observed in the HAVEN 1 study, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) should be used with caution. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to identify and discuss real-world data on the frequency of BTBs and the safety of concomitant rFVIIa use in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS: A search of the following databases was conducted on 15 July 2022: BIOSIS Previews® , Current Contents Search® , Embase® , MEDLINE® . Search terms included 'real world', 'haemophilia A', and 'emicizumab'. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Eleven relevant publications were identified (seven original research articles and four congress abstracts). The frequency of BTBs specifically for HA patients with inhibitors was described in three publications with 5%-56% patients on emicizumab reporting ≥1 bleeding episode. Treatment of these BTBs appeared to be managed according to relevant guidelines. Importantly, no thrombotic complications occurred during concomitant rFVIIa use. Due to the nature of real-world studies, direct comparison of the results between studies is limited. However, real-world data show that BTBs in inhibitor patients during emicizumab prophylaxis can be safely treated with rFVIIa.

Safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean adult patients with ulcerative colitis: post-marketing surveillance study.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to identify the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with UC in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This open-label, observational, prospective, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted at 22 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with moderate to severe active UC who received tofacitinib were included and followed up for up to 52 weeks. Tofacitinib was administered at a dosage of 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks, followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily at the investigator's discretion based on clinical evaluation according to the approved Korean label. Safety including adverse events (AEs) and effectiveness including clinical remission, clinical response, and endoscopic mucosal healing were evaluated. Safety analysis set was defined as all patients registered for this study who received at least one dose of tofacitinib according to the approved Korean label and followed up for safety data. Effectiveness analysis set included patients in the safety analysis set who were evaluated for overall effectiveness assessment and excluded patients who had received tofacitinib less than 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were enrolled, of whom 106 patients were included in the safety population. The median duration of treatment was 370 days and the treatment duration ranged from 16 to 684 days for the safety population. AEs occurred in 42 patients (39.6%). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 patients (6.6%) and of them, there were 2 cases of serious infections. These serious infections were reported as Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) in this study and no other AESI were reported. There were no cases of death during the study period. Clinical remission rates were 40.0%, 46.7%, 57.6%, and 55.1% at 8, 16, 24, and 52 weeks, and clinical response rates were 77.8%, 87.9%, 56.6%, and 81.4% at each visit, respectively. Endoscopic mucosal healing rates were 58.7% at 16 weeks and 46.2% at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib was effective in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC and the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib. This study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC in routine clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04071405, registered on 28 August 2019.

Safety and effectiveness of clofarabine in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: Clofarabine is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, but evidence of its safety and effectiveness in Japanese patients is limited. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of clofarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in real-world clinical practice in Japan. METHODS: An observational, multicenter, post-marketing, all-case surveillance was conducted for safety. Effectiveness analyses were conducted in patients aged ≤21 years and those treated with clofarabine monotherapy and combination therapy (clofarabine plus etoposide and cyclophosphamide). RESULTS: In the all-case survey, 260 of 264 registered patients were eligible for safety analysis. Among the 225 patients eligible for effectiveness analysis, 139 were aged ≤21 years. For monotherapy and combination therapy, 20/31 and 34/88 patients were eligible, respectively. In the all-case survey, the median age was 16.0 years, and 47.7% of patients were <15 years old. Adverse drug reaction incidence was 83.5% and the most common were hematologic toxicities. The best overall response rates in the population aged ≤21 years were complete remission, 29.7%; complete remission without platelet recovery, 7.3% and partial remission, 10.9%. The rest (52.2%) were classified as ineffective. The sum of complete remission, complete remission without platelet recovery and partial remission rates (effectiveness rate) was 47.8% (66/138 patients). The effectiveness rates in the monotherapy and combination therapy surveys were 10.0% (2/20 patients) and 58.8% (20/34 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These post-marketing surveys provide real-world evidence of the safety and effectiveness of clofarabine regimens, including monotherapy and combination therapy in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The safety and effectiveness profiles were comparable with those of previous prospective studies.

Real-world outcomes of ponatinib treatment in 724 patients with CML and Ph+ ALL: a post-marketing surveillance study with a special interest in arterial occlusive events in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In September 2016, ponatinib was approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with resistance/intolerance to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors and patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. METHODS: We conducted a post-marketing all-case surveillance to study the safety and efficacy of ponatinib in clinical practice, focusing on arterial occlusive events. RESULTS: Data from 724 patients were collected for 2 years from the initiation of ponatinib. The arterial occlusive events were reported in 6.49% (47/724) with an exposure-adjusted incidence rate of 6.8/100 person-years. The risks associated with arterial occlusive events were age and comorbidities including hypertension and diabetes. At 104 weeks, the cumulative major molecular response rate in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia was 67.2% and the complete cytogenetic response in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia was 80.0%. Furthermore, the estimated 1-year overall survival rate was 98.5% for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and 68.6% for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: This surveillance demonstrated that ponatinib has a favorable safety and efficacy profile in Japanese patients and also showed the necessity of closely monitoring arterial occlusive events in older adults and patients with predisposing factors for atherosclerosis.

The patient perspective on dose optimization for anticancer treatments: A new era of cancer drug dosing-Challenging the "more is better" dogma.

The Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, a patient-led effort advocating for a paradigm shift in determining cancer drug dosing strategies, pioneers a departure from traditional oncology drug dosing practices. Historically, oncology drug dosing relies on identifying the maximum tolerated dose through phase 1 dose escalation methodology, favoring higher dosing for greater efficacy, often leading to higher toxicity. However, this approach is not universally applicable, especially for newer treatments like targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative challenges this "more is better" ethos, particularly as metastatic breast cancer patients themselves, as they not only seek longevity but also a high quality of life since most metastatic breast cancer patients stay on treatment for the rest of their lives. Surveying 1221 metastatic breast cancer patients and 119 oncologists revealed an evident need for flexible dosing strategies, advocating personalized care discussions based on patient attributes. The survey results also demonstrated an openness toward flexible dosing and a willingness from both patients and clinicians to discuss dosing as part of their care. Patient-centered dosing emphasizes dialogue between clinicians and patients, delving into treatment efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Similarly, clinical trial advocacy for multiple dosing regimens encourages adaptive strategies, moving away from strict adherence to maximum tolerated dose, supported by recent research in optimizing drug dosages. Recognizing the efficacy-effectiveness gap between clinical trials and real-world practice, Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative underscores the necessity for patient-centered dosing strategies. A focus on individual patient attributes aligns with initiatives like Project Optimus and Project Renewal, aiming to optimize drug dosages for improved treatment outcomes at both the pre- and post-approval phases. Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative's efforts extend to patient education, providing tools to initiate dosage-related conversations with physicians. In addition, it emphasizes physician-patient dialogues and post-marketing studies as essential in determining optimal dosing and refining drug regimens. A dose-finding paradigm prioritizing drug safety, tolerability, and efficacy benefits all stakeholders, reducing emergency care needs and missed treatments for patients, aligning with oncologists' and patients' shared goals. Importantly, it represents a win-win scenario across healthcare sectors. In summary, the Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative drives transformative changes in cancer drug dosing, emphasizing patient well-being and personalized care, aiming to enhance treatment outcomes and optimize oncology drug delivery.

Safety of nivolumab monotherapy in five cancer types: pooled analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab has been approved for treating ≥ 10 cancer types. However, there is limited information on the incidence of rare, but potentially serious, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), as well as notable TRAEs in patients with certain medical disorders or older patients in Japan. METHODS: We performed pooled analyses of data from published post-marketing surveillance in Japan of nivolumab monotherapy for patients with malignant melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, and gastric cancer to determine the frequencies of 20 categories of TRAEs of special interest overall and in patient groups with higher perceived safety risks (history of autoimmune disease, interstitial lung disease, tuberculosis, or hepatitis B/C; patients vaccinated during nivolumab treatment; and older patients [≥ 75 years]). RESULTS: The overall population comprised 7421 patients treated with nivolumab. TRAEs were reported in 49.1% of patients, with grade ≥ 3 TRAEs in 16.7%. Endocrine disorders (14.4%), hepatobiliary disorders (10.9%), and interstitial lung disease (7.0%) were the three most common categories (any grade). The incidences of rare TRAEs with high risk of becoming serious, which occurred in < 1% of patients, were consistent with those in previous reports. The frequencies of TRAEs were not markedly increased in the specified patient groups relative to the overall population. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining the safety of nivolumab-treated patients in real-world clinical practice including rare but potentially serious TRAEs. We found no new signals in the safety of nivolumab among the patient groups relative to the overall population, and no additional safety measures are required in these groups. Trial registration UMIN000048892 (overall analysis), JapicCTI-163272 (melanoma), Japic-163271 (non-small cell lung cancer), JapicCTI-184071 (head and neck cancer), JapicCTI-184070 (gastric cancer), and JapicCTI-184069 (renal cell cancer).

Safety and effectiveness of sarilumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to previous treatments: An interim analysis of a post-marketing surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: An interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance data to assess the safety and effectiveness of sarilumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to previous treatment. METHODS: The interim analysis included patients who initiated sarilumab therapy between June 2018 and January 2021. The primary objective of this surveillance was safety. RESULTS: In total, 1036 patients were enrolled and registered by 12 January 2021 (interim cut-off date). Of these, 678 were included in the safety analysis [75.4% female; mean age (± standard deviation) 65.8 ± 13.0 years]. Adverse drug reactions, defined as adverse events classified as possibly or probably related to sarilumab, were reported in 170 patients (incidence: 25.1%), with white blood cell count decreased (4.4%) and neutrophil count decreased (1.6%) most frequently reported. Serious haematologic disorders (3.4%) and serious infections (including tuberculosis) (2.5%) were the most frequently reported priority surveillance items. No malignant tumour was reported. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below the minimum standard value did not increase the incidence of serious infections. CONCLUSIONS: Sarilumab was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were noted in this analysis. There was no difference in the frequency of serious infections between patients with an ANC below or above normal.

Safety of sarilumab in a Japanese population with rheumatoid arthritis by age group: Data from an interim analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: Using data from a post-marketing surveillance, this interim subgroup analysis investigated the safety of sarilumab in younger (<65 years) and older patients (≥65 and ≥75 years) with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: During this interim analysis, patients who were treated with sarilumab in Japan were enrolled between June 2018-2021. Data collected by 12 January 2022 were analysed, with adverse drug events monitored over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of 972 patients with available data, proportion of patients aged <65 years, ≥65 years and ≥75 years were 40.8%, 59.2% and 27.8%, respectively. Most patients (95.5%) received the standard 200 mg dose of sarilumab as the initial dose. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 24.6% of patients, with serious events accounting for 6.4% of cases. No malignancy and low incidences of adverse drug reactions of special interest were reported across all age groups (<65 years, 7.8%; ≥65 years, 8.2%; ≥75 years, 8.5%). When stratified by absolute neutrophil count above and below the lower limit of normal, there were no numerical differences in incidences of serious and non-serious infections between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, sarilumab therapy was well tolerated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with no new safety signals reported in this study.

Six-month safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the real-world safety/effectiveness of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in patients with RA in Japan registered in a post-marketing surveillance study. METHODS: This interim analysis included data from July 2013 to December 2018. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)/Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)/Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] scores, and rates of SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR)-defined remission and low disease activity were analysed using 6 months of data. Risk factors for serious infections were assessed by multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Safety and disease activity were evaluated in 6866 and 6649 patients, respectively. Overall, 32.73%/7.37% of patients reported AEs/SAEs. Clinically important AEs with tofacitinib included serious infections/infestations [3.13% of patients; incidence rate (IR; patients with events) 6.91/100 patient-years (PY)], herpes zoster (3.63%; IR 8.02/100 PY), and malignancies (0.68%; IR 1.45/100 PY). SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR) scores and remission/low disease activity rates improved over 6 months. Male sex, older age, Steinbrocker's stage IV, history of infection, and diabetes mellitus at baseline were independent risk factors for serious infection. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA receiving tofacitinib in Japan, safety was consistent with the reported profile, and disease activity improved over 6 months. STUDY IDENTIFIER: NCT01932372.

Safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical use: 3-year data of all-case post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This all-case post-marketing surveillance study included patients initiating baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis from September 2017 to April 2019. Treatment duration was recorded. Safety data were collected for up to 3 years from baricitinib initiation (up to 4 weeks post discontinuation in discontinuing patients). RESULTS: Safety analyses included 4720 patients; 2580 (54.7%) were ≥65 years old. Baricitinib persistence rate was 45.4% (3 year Kaplan-Meier analysis); the most common discontinuation reason was insufficient effectiveness (n = 1005, 21.3%). Serious adverse events occurred in 600 patients (incidence rate 10.42/100 patient-years; 95% confidence interval, 9.76-11.09). There were 39 deaths (incidence rate 0.43 [0.30-0.57]/100 patient-years). Incidence rate per 100 patient-years for adverse events of special interest were herpes zoster 4.68 (4.22-5.14), serious infection 3.05 (2.68-3.41), malignancy 1.09 (0.87-1.30), major adverse cardiovascular events 0.35 (0.23-0.48) and venous thromboembolism 0.25 (0.15-0.36). Incidence rates did not increase with prolonged exposure. CONCLUSIONS: No new safety concerns were identified during this 3 year post-marketing surveillance study of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients and clinicians should be cognizant of herpes zoster and other serious infection risks during baricitinib treatment, especially in the first 6 months.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Healthcare Professionals in Sri Lanka- A Cross Sectional Study.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) reporting among healthcare professionals at Teaching Hospital Karapitiya (THK), a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at THK. The healthcare professionals working in THK who were available during the study period were invited to the study. A self-administered pre-tested questionnaire was administered to the participants. Respondents were evaluated for their knowledge, attitudes and practices related to ADR reporting. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: Of the total 444 respondents, 31% were doctors and 69% were nurses. The majority of respondents, 90% (n = 400) were aware of the term ADR, while 64.8% (n = 288) could correctly define it. Among the respondents, 30.8% (n = 137) knew about the types of ADR and only 15.5% (n = 70) were able to mention a drug that is banned due to ADR correctly. Among the respondents, only 38.7% (n = 172) were aware of a formal process of reporting ADR and, only 35.3% (n = 157) stated that they had seen the ADR reporting form. Further, only 33.7% (n = 150) respondents have recognized ADR during their clinical practice and only a small proportion 18.2% (n = 81) have ever reported an ADR during their practice. Regarding attitudes toward ADR reporting, overall 84.1 (n = 373) had positive attitudes toward ADR reporting, while 13.54% (n = 60) of them stayed neutral and 2.25% (n = 10) had negative attitudes toward ADR reporting. Conclusions: Although the majority were aware of ADR , the knowledge and practices regarding spontaneous reporting of ADR are inadequate. However, most respondents have shown a positive attitude toward ADR reporting. A sincere and sustained effort should be made by concerned bodies to enhance the healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ADR reporting.

[Guidelines for post-marketing research on clinical effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines].

Due to the lack of specialized guidance, the post-marketing research on clinical effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines demonstrates varied quality and lacks high-quality evidence, failing to meet the demands of policy-making, clinical decision-making, and industrial decision-making. To address this issue, this project gathered experts in clinical medicine, clinical pharmacy, evidence-based medicine, drug epidemiology, medical ethics, and policy and regulation in China. They referred to the model of international post-marketing research on medicines and developed Guidelines for post-marketing research on clinical effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines under the framework of relevant laws and regulations and technical guidance documents in China. The guidelines were developed with consideration to the characteristics of Chinese patent medicines, China's national conditions, and all the stakeholders including marketing authorization holders, clinical researchers, drug administration, and users. The development of the guidelines followed the requirements for developing group standards set by the China Association of Chinese Medicine. The guidelines fully implement the concept of full life-cycle research, emphasizing the combination of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) theory, human use experience, and clinical trials and pay attention to the compliance, scientificity, and ethics of research. The guidelines clarify the topic selection and decision-making path of the post-marketing research on effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines through six steps: determining research purpose, analyzing drug characteristics, evaluating research basis, proposing clinical orientation, clarifying research purpose, and implementing classified research. The general principles of research design and implementation were clarified from eight aspects: research type, research objects, sample size, efficacy indicators, bias, missing data, evidence level, and practicality. It focuses on the research on the TCM syndrome-based efficacy evaluation, clinical value-oriented mechanism of action, and the effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines with different routes of administration. The guidelines provide a universal methodological basis for the post-marketing research on clinical effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines.

[Guidelines for economic evaluation of post-marketing Chinese patent medicine].

With the premise of drug safety and effectiveness, pharmacoeconomic evaluation can provide optimal solutions for diversified decision-making application scenarios from different research perspectives while maximizing the rational utilization of existing healthcare resources. Chinese patent medicine is an essential component of pharmaceutical utilization in China and a significant part of healthcare expenditure in China. However, the economic evaluation of post-marketing Chinese patent medicine is lacking. These evaluations often lack standardization, exhibit varying quality, and are unable to effectively support healthcare decisions, indicating a need for improvement in overall quality. Given this situation, this project has gathered leading experts from China and has strictly adhered to the requirements of the group standards set by the China Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine in developing Guidelines for economic evaluation of post-marketing Chinese patent medicine, aiming to provide methodological guidance for the post-market pharmacoeconomic evaluation of Chinese patent medicine, enhancing the standardization of pharmacoeconomic evaluations of Chinese patent medicine and the scientific validity of research results, and thereby elevating the overall quality of pharmacoeconomic evaluations for post-marketing Chinese patent medicine. The guidelines adhere to the framework provided by relevant laws and regulations in China and technical guidance documents. It is based on guidance from traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) theories, focusing on the unique characteristics of TCM. It covers various aspects of pharmacoeconomic evaluation, including fundamental principles, research topic selection, research question definition, study design type selection, cost identification and measurement, health outcomes, and evaluation methods. The guidelines offer methodological recommendations and decision guidance to address common issues and challenges in the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of post-marketing Chinese patent medicine.

Safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma: a nation-wide post-marketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to identify factors associated with the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma and to confirm the real-world safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients. METHODS: This multicenter, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted over a 1-year observation period starting at pembrolizumab initiation (200-mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks); data were collected from case report forms (3 months and 1 year). Safety measures included treatment-related adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AEOSI). Effectiveness assessments included tumor response, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: Overall, 1293 patients were evaluated for safety and 1136 for effectiveness. At 12 months, the treatment-related adverse event incidence was 53.8% (n = 696) and that of AEOSI was 25.0% (n = 323). The most frequent AEOSI of any grade were endocrinological disorder (10.4%, n = 134), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (7.2%, n = 93), and hepatic function disorder (4.9%, n = 64). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing ILD was almost seven times greater (odds ratio 6.60) in patients with a comorbidity of ILD, and approximately twice as high in patients aged ≥ 65 years (odds ratio 2.24) and with smoking history (odds ratio 1.79). The ORR was 26.1% and the DCR was 50.7%. The ORR was 46.4% in patients with a Bellmunt risk score of 0 and decreased as the Bellmunt risk score increased. CONCLUSIONS: This post-marketing surveillance confirmed the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma in the real-world setting.

Real-world effectiveness of third-line cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CARD-like analysis of data from a post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The CARD trial was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had received docetaxel and experienced disease progression within 1 year on an androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy (ARAT). Subsequent treatment with cabazitaxel had improved clinical outcomes compared with an alternative ARAT. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of cabazitaxel in real-world patients in Japan and compare their characteristics with those of patients from the CARD trial. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a nationwide post-marketing surveillance registering all patients who were prescribed cabazitaxel in Japan between September 2014 and June 2015. Included patients had received docetaxel and ≤ 1 year of an ARAT (abiraterone or enzalutamide) prior to receiving cabazitaxel or an alternative ARAT, as their third-line therapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the time to treatment failure (TTF) of the third-line therapy. Patients were matched (1:1) from the cabazitaxel and second ARAT arms based on propensity score (PS). RESULTS: Of the 535 patients analysed, 247 received cabazitaxel and 288 the alternative ARAT as their third-line therapy, of which, 91.3% (n = 263/288) received abiraterone and 8.7% (n = 25/288) received enzalutamide as their second third-line ARAT. Patients in the cabazitaxel and second ARAT arms had TNM classification of M1 or MX in 73.3% and 68.1%, Gleason score of 8-10 in 78.5% and 79.2% and mean (standard deviation) serum PSA levels of 483 (1370) and 594 (1241) ng/mL, respectively. Initial cabazitaxel dose was ≤ 20 mg/m2 in 61.9% (n = 153/247) of the patients in the cabazitaxel arm. The median TTF (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the third-line therapy was 109 (94-128) days for cabazitaxel and 58 (57-66) days for the second ARAT, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.339 (0.279-0.413) favouring cabazitaxel. Similar results were obtained after PS-matching, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.323 (95% CI 0.258-0.402) favouring cabazitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the CARD trial, cabazitaxel demonstrated superior effectiveness over a second alternative ARAT in a real-world patient population in Japan, despite the population having more advanced disease status and a lower dose of cabazitaxel being more frequently administered, than in the CARD trial.

Cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity in previously treated patients during post-marketing surveillance of N8-GP.

INTRODUCTION: Turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) is a glycoPEGylated, extended half-life (EHL), human recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) approved for the treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A. Since its launch in August 2019, > 800 patients have been treated worldwide. AIM: To present data from identified post-marketing cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity in previously treated patients (PTPs) without inhibitors after switching to N8-GP. METHODS: The post-marketing safety database was searched using keywords such as 'coagulation FVIII level decreased'. Identified cases reported prior to 13 October 2021 were included in this report. Cases in which patients had FVIII inhibitors were excluded. RESULTS: Here we report 14 cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity. Details varied greatly amongst the cases. At presentation, FVIII activity ranged from 1% (15 min post-dose) to 51% (2 days post-dose). Seven patients experienced bleeding episodes after switching to N8-GP with heterogeneity in bleeding presentations. Six out of seven patients who were tested for anti-PEG IgG and/or IgM antibodies were positive. In all known cases, FVIII activity returned to the expected range when switched to an alternative FVIII replacement product. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the 14 reported cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity, without presence of detectable FVIII inhibitors, presented with heterogenous characteristics, and wide variations in FVIII activity and anti-PEG antibody titre. FVIII activity returned to the expected range after switching to alternative FVIII products. In line with WFH guidelines, monitoring of FVIII activity can ensure FVIII activity in the expected range. The safety surveillance of N8-GP continues.

Eculizumab for paediatric patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: full dataset analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Eculizumab was approved for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) in Japan in 2013. Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was mandated by regulatory authorities to assess the safety and effectiveness of eculizumab in patients with aHUS in a real-world setting. METHODS: Paediatric patients in the PMS cohort who were <18 years of age at the first administration of eculizumab and diagnosed with aHUS [excluding Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli HUS, thrombotic thrombocytopaenic purpura and secondary thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)] were included in the effectiveness and safety analysis. Clinical endpoints of effectiveness [complete TMA response, TMA event-free status, platelet (PLT) count and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) normalization, serum creatinine (sCr) decrease and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improvement] were analysed in patients treated with at least one dose of eculizumab. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 40 paediatric patients (median age 5 years) were included. The median eculizumab treatment duration was 66 weeks. PLT count, LDH and eGFR significantly improved at 10 days post-treatment. Complete TMA response, haematologic normalization, sCr decrease, eGFR improvement and TMA event-free status were achieved by 73.3%, 73.3%, 70.0%, 78.3% and 77.5% of patients, respectively. Discontinuation criteria were met by 18 patients: 13 patients maintained treatment discontinuation at the end of observation and 5 patients, including 1 patient with aHUS relapse, continued the treatment but extended the treatment interval. During eculizumab treatment, 59 SAEs (0.66/person-year) were reported. Although four deaths were reported, none of them were related to eculizumab. CONCLUSION: Eculizumab was well tolerated and effective for paediatric patients with aHUS in the real-world setting in Japan.

Safety and effectiveness of once-yearly zoledronic acid in Japanese osteoporosis patients: three-year post-marketing surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid (5 mg; ZOL), a once-yearly bisphosphonate, reduces osteoporotic fractures and increases bone mineral density (BMD). This 3-year post-marketing surveillance examined its real-world safety and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients who started ZOL for osteoporosis. Data were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months for safety and effectiveness. Treatment persistence, potentially related factors, and persistence before and after the COVID-19 pandemic started were also investigated. RESULTS: The safety analysis and effectiveness analysis sets included 1406 and 1387 patients, respectively, with mean age of 76.5 years. Adverse reactions (ARs) occurred in 19.35% of patients, with an acute-phase reaction in 10.31, 1.01, and 0.55% after the first, second, and third ZOL infusions. Renal function-related ARs, hypocalcaemia, jaw osteonecrosis, and atypical femoral fracture occurred in 1.71, 0.43, 0.43, and 0.07% of patients, respectively. Three-year cumulative fracture incidences were 4.44% for vertebral, 5.64% for non-vertebral, and 9.56% for clinical fractures. BMD increased by 6.79, 3.14, and 1.78% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, respectively, after 3-year treatment. Bone turnover markers remained within reference ranges. Treatment persistence was 70.34% over 2 years and 51.71% over 3 years. Male, age ≥ 75 years, no previous medicines for osteoporosis, no concomitant medicines for osteoporosis, and inpatient at the first infusion were related to discontinuation. There was no significant difference in the persistence rate between before and after the COVID-19 pandemic (74.7% vs. 69.9%; p = 0.141). CONCLUSION: This 3-year post-marketing surveillance confirmed the real-world safety and effectiveness of ZOL.

Safety and Effectiveness of Alirocumab, a Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitor, in Patients With Familial or Non-Familial Hypercholesterolemia　- A Post-Marketing Survey (J-POSSIBLE).

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of alirocumab in Japanese patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or non-FH in a real-world clinical setting.Methods and Results: This post-marketing surveillance study had a 2-year standard observation period. The study included Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia who were treatment naïve to alirocumab, had a high risk of developing cardiovascular events, and had an insufficient response to, or were unsuitable for, treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Alirocumab was administered at a dose of 75 or 150 mg via subcutaneous injection every 2 or 4 weeks. Overall, 1,177 and 1,038 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis populations, respectively. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 3.4% (40/1,177). The time to ADR occurrence was within 4 weeks in half the patients experiencing ADRs (n=20). There were no meaningful differences in the ADRs experienced in the FH and non-FH groups. The mean (±SE) percentage changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to last observation carried forward were -46.9±2.1% and -42.7±2.0% in the non-FH and FH groups, respectively. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B/E, and lipoprotein(a) concentrations were decreased at Week 4 and maintained until Week 104 in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Alirocumab was well tolerated and showed effectiveness in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia in a real-world clinical setting.

Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab.

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is caused by complement dysregulation and is generally diagnosed by exclusion from other disorders of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, has been approved for aHUS treatment since 2013 in Japan. Recently, a scoring system was published to support diagnosis of aHUS. Herein we modified this scoring system to apply it to patients diagnosed with aHUS and treated with eculizumab, and assessed the association between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab. METHODS: One hundred eighty-eight Japanese patients who were clinically diagnosed with aHUS, treated with eculizumab, and enrolled in post-marketing surveillance (PMS) were included in this analysis. Some of parameters in the original scoring system were replaced with clinically similar parameters collected in the PMS to modify the system, hereafter referred to as the TMA/aHUS score, which ranges from -15 to 20 points. Treatment responses within 90 days after eculizumab initiation were also assessed, and the relationship between treatment response and TMA/aHUS scores calculated at TMA onset was explored. RESULTS: The median (range) TMA/aHUS score was 10 (3-16). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of TMA/aHUS score to predict treatment response to eculizumab was estimated as 10, and negative predictive value indicated that ≥ 5 points was appropriate to consider assessing the treatment response to eculizumab; 185 (98%) patients had ≥ 5 points and 3 (2%) had < 5 points. Among the patients with ≥ 5 points, 96.1% showed partial response and 31.1% showed complete response. One of the three patients with < 5 points met partial response criteria. No significant difference in the TMA/aHUS scores was observed between survivors and non-survivors, suggesting that the score was not appropriate to predict the outcome (i.e., survival/death) in patients treated with eculizumab. CONCLUSION: Almost all patients clinically diagnosed with aHUS scored ≥ 5 points and responded to eculizumab. The TMA/aHUS score system could become a supporting tool for the clinical diagnosis of aHUS and probability of response to treatment with a C5 inhibitor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was conducted as per good PMS practice guidelines for drugs (MHLW Ministerial Ordinance No. 171 of 2004).