RESUMO
Cardiac disease complicates 1%-4% of pregnancies globally, with a predominance in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Increasing maternal age, rates of obesity, cardiovascular comorbidities, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes all contribute to acquired cardiovascular disease in pregnancy. Additionally, improved survival in congenital heart disease (CHD) has led to increasing numbers of women with CHD undergoing pregnancy. Implementation of individualised care plans formulated through pre-conception counselling and based on national and international guidance have contributed to improved clinical outcomes. However, there remains a significant proportion of women of reproductive age with no apparent comorbidities or risk factors that develop heart disease during pregnancy, with no indication for pre-conception counselling. The most extreme manifestation of cardiac disease is cardiogenic shock (CS), where the primary cardiac pathology results in inadequate cardiac output and hypoperfusion, and is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Key to management is early recognition, intervention to treat any potentially reversible underlying pathology and supportive measures, up to and including mechanical circulatory support (MCS). In this narrative review we discuss recent developments in the classification of CS, and how these may be adapted to improve outcomes of pregnant women with, or at risk of developing, this potentially lethal condition.
Assuntos
Pré-Eclâmpsia , Choque Cardiogênico , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Obesidade/complicaçõesRESUMO
Women with underlying cardiac conditions have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Counselling reproductive age women with heart disease is important to assist them in deciding whether to pursue pregnancy, to ensure their best cardiovascular status prior to pregnancy, and that they understand the risks of pregnancy for them and baby. This also provides an opportunity to explore management strategies to reduce risks. For this growing cohort of women, there is a great need for pre-conceptual counselling.This retrospective comparative audit assessed new referrals and pre-conceptual counselling of women attending a joint obstetric-cardiology clinic at a tertiary maternity centre in a 12-month period of 2015-2016 compared with 2018-2019. This reflected the timing of the introduction of a multidisciplinary meeting prior to clinics and assessed the impact on referrals with the introduction of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.Data were reviewed from 56 and 67 patients in respective audit periods. Patient's risk was stratified using modified World Health Organization classification.Less than 50% of women with pre-existing cardiac conditions had received pre-conceptual counselling, although half of them had risks clearly documented. The majority of patients had a recent electrocardiograph and echocardiogram performed prior to counselling, and there was a modest improvement in the number of appropriate functional tests performed between time points. One-third of patients in both cohorts were taking cardiac medications during pregnancy.There was a significant increase in the number of pregnant women with cardiac disease and in complexity according to modified World Health Organization risk classification. While there have been improvements, it is clear that further work to improve availability and documentation of pre-pregnancy counselling is needed.
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Cardiopatias , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Cardiopatias/complicações , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are associated with increased risk of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. It is important to distinguish between pre-existing (chronic) hypertension and gestational hypertension, developing after 20 weeks of gestation and usually resolving within 6 weeks postpartum. There is a consensus that systolic blood pressure ≥ 170 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg is an emergency and hospitalization is indicated. The selection of the antihypertensive drug and its route of administration depend on the expected time of delivery. The current European guidelines recommend initiating drug treatment in pregnant women with persistent elevation of blood pressure ≥ 150/95 mmHg and at values > 140/90 mmHg in women with gestational hypertension (with or without proteinuria), with pre-existing hypertension with the superimposition of gestational hypertension, and with hypertension with subclinical organ damage or symptoms at any time during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and calcium antagonists (the most data are available for nifedipine) are the drugs of choice. The results of the CHIPS and CHAP studies are likely to reduce the threshold for initiating treatment. Women with a history of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly those with pre-eclampsia, are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life. Obstetric history should become a part of the cardiovascular risk assessment in women.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Hipertensão , Labetalol , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea , Labetalol/efeitos adversosRESUMO
AIMS: To establish the knowledge of women with pre-gestational diabetes about of the risks of diabetes in pregnancy, and investigate their pregnancy plans, contraceptive choices, and preparedness for pregnancy. METHODS: Women of reproductive age attending diabetes clinics across a single busy metropolitan NHS Trust were invited to fill in a questionnaire about pregnancy and contraception. The electronic health records of those women were also reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-six women completed the questionnaire. The majority of respondents (94%) had Type 1 Diabetes. Only 3% of women met the criteria of 'prepared for pregnancy'. Low efficacy contraception was used by 32% of women. Most women were only aware of a few risks to the mother and fetus in pregnancy, though the majority of women were aware of the importance of good glycaemic control before pregnancy. Previous pregnancies, or attendance at pre-conception counselling, did not improve participant knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Many women with diabetes of reproductive age are poorly prepared for pregnancy, but many are also using less effective contraceptive methods. These areas should be addressed if the poor pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes are to be improved, possibly through the development of an evidenced-based structured education course to target pre-conception and contraception.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Gestacional , Anticoncepção , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Atenção Secundária à Saúde , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The story of congenital heart disease is one of the major successes of medicine in the last 50 years. Heart conditions previously associated with early death are now successfully treated. Many of these women are now in their child-bearing years wishing to have children of their own. All of these women should be offered comprehensive pre-conception counselling by a dedicated multi-disciplinary team. Each woman will present a unique set of cardiac and obstetric challenges that require an individualised assessment of risk and a carefully documented care plan. In this chapter, I describe the most common forms of congenital heart disease and the specific issues that should be assessed before conception. I present a systematic approach to risk stratification and care planning. These lesions range from mild disease with little implications for pregnancy to those with a sizable risk of maternal mortality or complications. I will also discuss fetal risk factors.