Perioperative mortality of head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers are aggressive cancers, most clinical studies focused on the prognosis of patients with head and neck cancer. However, perioperative mortality was rarely mentioned. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using all head and neck cancer patients admitting in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2010 to December 2019. The analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and cross tabulation with chi-squared testing was applied to analyze the difference in parameters between groups. RESULTS: From January 2010 to December 2019, a total of 6576 patients with head and neck cancers were admitted to our department and 7 died in the hospital, all of whom were middle-aged and elderly patients including 6 males and 1 female. The perioperative mortality rate (POMR) was about 1‰. The causes of death included acute heart failure, rupture of large blood vessels in the neck, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy due to asphyxia, respiratory failure and cardiopulmonary arrest. CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiotherapy, previous chemotherapy, hypertension, diabetes, advanced clinical stage and postoperative infection are risk factors for perioperative mortality of head and neck cancer.

Efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer in relation to the number of previous chemotherapy regimens: Comparison with gemcitabine.

AIM: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is one of the second-line chemotherapy regimens for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, but in clinical practice, it is also used for third or subsequent lines of chemotherapy. There is no report on the efficacy and toxicity of PLD in relation to the number of previous chemotherapy regimens. The purpose of this study was to clarify these points and compare with the results of gemcitabine (GEM) therapy we reported previously. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent two or more cycles of PLD therapy between July 2009 and March 2017 at our institution. We used our reported data of GEM for comparison analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate was 19.2% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 53.8%. The DCR with 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more previous regimens was 53.8%, 48.6%, 63.6% and 66.7%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and anemia developed in 59.0% and 12.8%, respectively. Grade 2 or higher hand -foot syndrome, stomatitis, and liver dysfunction developed in 25.6%, 25.6% and 2.6%, respectively. When the number of previous regimens was 3 or higher, the DCR of PLD was significantly higher than that of GEM (64.7% vs 30.8%, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The DCR did not decrease with a greater number of previous regimens. When the number of previous regimens was 3 or higher, PLD therapy had a superior DCR to GEM therapy. Toxicity was tolerable in PLD therapy.

Efficacy of Trabectedin in Patients with Advanced Translocation-Related Sarcomas: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase II Studies.

BACKGROUND: Trabectedin is reported as effective, especially against translocation-related sarcomas (TRSs) after failure of or intolerance to standard chemotherapy. We conducted two phase II studies of TRS, confirming high efficacy of 1.2 mg/m2 trabectedin. The updated data of 66 patients in these studies was integrated to evaluate the efficacy of trabectedin against each histological subtype, and analyze final overall survival (OS). METHODS: Trabectedin was administered on day one of a 21-day cycle. Efficacy was assessed using progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and best overall response. An analysis of OS and PFS was performed for subgroups divided by baseline lymphocyte count (<1,000/µL, ≥1,000/µL) or number of previous chemotherapy regimens (0, 1, 2, ≥3 regimens), and a Weibull parametric model was used to estimate the numerical relationship between lymphocyte count and PFS and OS. RESULTS: Median PFS and OS in overall patients were 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1-7.3) and 17.5 months (95% CI: 12.6-23.6), respectively. PFS in the myxoid and round-cell liposarcoma (MRCL) group (7.4 months [95% CI: 5.6-11.1]) was longer than in the other subtypes. The response rate was also highest in the MRCL group. Median OS was longer in patients with baseline lymphocyte counts ≥1,000/µL than in those with counts of <1,000/µL, but median PFS was not different between the two subgroups. CONCLUSION: Our updated and pooled data showed that trabectedin exerted prolonged disease control and antitumor effects in patients with advanced TRS, especially in MRCL. We consider that the subgroup analyses also provide important information for trabectedin treatment in patients with TRS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The progression-free survival (PFS) for the integrated data of 66 patients with translocation-related sarcomas (TRSs) in two phase II studies of trabectedin 1.2 mg/m2 was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval: 4.1-7.3). PFS and response rate in myxoid/round-cell liposarcoma was longer than that of other subtypes. The overall survival (OS) in all TRS subtypes was similar to previous data of TRS patients. In subgroup analysis, the patients with baseline lymphocyte count ≥1,000/µL exhibited better OS, although PFS was not different by baseline lymphocyte count. Our data are considered important information for trabectedin treatment in TRS patients.

Response to and toxicity of gemcitabine for recurrent ovarian cancer according to number of previous chemotherapy regimens.

AIM: Gemcitabine is used not only as a second-line, but also as a third-line or higher regimen for taxane/platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to clarify the response to and toxicity of gemcitabine for recurrent ovarian cancer according to the number of previous chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: The subjects were patients with taxane/platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer on gemcitabine treatment at the present hospital between June 2007 and September 2013. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records. Response and adverse events were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0, respectively. RESULTS: The subjects consisted of 65 patients. The median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range, 1-7). Overall response rate was 4.6%, and disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. DCR versus one, two, three, and ≥four previous chemotherapy regimens was 83.3%, 45.0%, 36.4%, and 23.5%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 52.3%, 9.2%, and 9.2% of patients, respectively. Prevalence of grade 3/4 neutropenia according to one, two, three, and ≥four previous chemotherapy regimens was 66.7%, 55.0%, 54.5%, and 41.2%, respectively. Prevalence of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and almost all the non-hematological toxicities also did not increase with an increase in the number of previous chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Although DCR decreased as the number of previous chemotherapy regimens increased, the toxicities did not increase. Gemcitabine may be relatively safe in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients.

Predictors of olaparib discontinuation owing to adverse drug events in patients with ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer: a retrospective observational study.

We investigated predictors of olaparib discontinuation owing to adverse effects. Patients with ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers treated with olaparib at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital between April 2018 and September 2022 were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: discontinuation of treatment due to disease progression, use of anaemia medications, and use of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) inhibitors. The follow-up period was 90 d. Of the 46 eligible patients, 21 patients discontinued olaparib, including 15 patients with grade 3 or higher anaemia, eight patients with grade 3 or higher neutropenia, and four patients with non-haematological toxicity (including multiple onset). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that grade 4 neutropenia and anaemia progression to grades 2-3 due to chemotherapy administered before olaparib administration were predictors of olaparib discontinuation. The severity of neutropenia and anaemia due to chemotherapy before olaparib administration may be a potential marker for its discontinuation.

TFE3 Gene Rearrangement in Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasm (PEComa) of the Genitourinary Tract.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms with unpredictable behavior. They are characterized by epithelioid cells, which stain with melanocytic markers, associated with spindle cells reactive for smooth muscle markers. PEComas may be sporadic or associated with the tuberous sclerosis complex, with mutations affecting mostly tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) 2 and less frequently TSC1 genes. More recently a subtype of PEComa harboring TFE3 gene rearrangement, mutually exclusive with TSC complex mutations, has been identified. The bladder and the other genitourinary tract organs are an infrequent site of origin; to date, only 3 cases of primitive bladder PEComas, 1 prostatic PEComa, and 2 epithelioid angiomyolipomas of the kidney with TFE3 rearrangement have been described in literature. We report a bladder PEComa case with Xp11 rearrangement in a patient who previously had undergone chemotherapy for chronic lymphatic leukemia. We assessed the meaning of the presence of TFE3 rearrangement in genitourinary tract PEComas and the possible correlation of these uncommon lesions with previous chemotherapy. A better understanding of this entity's genetics may help suggest appropriate targeted therapy, which is still lacking in genitourinary tract PEComas.

Spontaneous Tumor Lysis Syndrome in T-Cell Leukemia.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a constellation of metabolic derangements that occur as a consequence of rapid cell turnover in malignancy and the release of intracellular solutes - potassium, phosphate, and nucleic acid metabolites. TLS classically occurs following chemotherapy, with severe renal failure. However, the entity referred to as spontaneous TLS occurs without a precipitating factor of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, steroid therapy, or immunotherapy and can develop in both hematologic and solid malignancies. Here, we report a rare case of a patient who presented with nonspecific symptoms, hyperphosphatemia, hyperuricemia, but hypercalcemia, resultant acute renal failure, with a large mediastinal mass and a pericardial effusion, who was later found to have spontaneous TLS. The workup led to the diagnosis of T-cell leukemia. Spontaneous TLS is often the first manifestation of occult or undetected malignancy, making this oncologic emergency a challenge to manage. The early diagnosis and prompt treatment of spontaneous TLS can reduce morbidity and mortality for patients with an otherwise curable disease.

Cisplatin- Versus Non-Cisplatin-based First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Previously Treated With Perioperative Cisplatin.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal choice of first-line chemotherapy for patients with relapse of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PCBC) is unclear. We investigated the outcomes with cisplatin rechallenge versus a non-cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent metastatic UC after PCBC in a multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient-level data were collected for patients who had received various first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced UC after previous PCBC. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prognostic ability of the type of perioperative and first-line chemotherapy to independently affect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after accounting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Data were available for 145 patients (12 centers). The mean age was 62 years; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was > 0 for 42.0% of the patients. Of the 145 patients, 63% had received cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The median time from previous chemotherapy (TFPC) was 6.2 months (range, 1-154 months). The median OS was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-27 months), and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5-7 months). A better ECOG PS and a longer TFPC (> 12 months vs. ≤ 12 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52; P < .001) was prognostic for OS and PFS. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.13-3.06; P = .015), which appeared to be pronounced in those patients with a TFPC of ≤ 12 months. Retreatment with cisplatin in the first-line setting was associated with worse OS (HR, 3.38; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The results of the present retrospective analysis suggest that for patients who have undergone previous PCBC for UC, rechallenging with cisplatin might confer a poorer OS, especially for those with progression within < 1 year.

Gefitinib frequently induces liver damage in patients with lung adenocarcinoma previously treated by chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib is known as one of the agents for treating patients with both advanced lung cancer and an epidermal growth-factor receptor mutation. In the epidermal growth-factor receptor-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer population, gefitinib therapy has been associated with increased response rate, longer progression-free survival, and better quality of life compared to other anticancer drugs. However, gefitinib has to be discontinued for patients in whom adverse events occur, even if it is still effective. Here, we retrospectively assessed the clinical course of patients receiving gefitinib therapy, with a particular focus on liver damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 24 Asian patients treated with 250 mg gefitinib daily at Kanagawa National Hospital, Japan, between January 2008 and June 2012, grade 3 liver damage (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) occurred in nine and were eligible for our assessment. The regimen was subsequently changed to alternate-day administration. The relationships between liver damage and each clinical factor were retrospectively examined using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the nine patients with liver damage, seven had previous exposure to another anticancer drug. There was a significant relationship between the incidence of liver damage and previous chemotherapy (P = 0.009). The objective response rates of patients treated with daily gefitinib 250 mg and alternate-day gefitinib following liver damage were 66.7% and 46.7%, respectively; these were not significantly different (P = 0.597). CONCLUSION: Gefitinib for advanced adenocarcinoma patients who have previously undergone chemotherapy should be used cautiously and liver function monitored closely, because it frequently induces significant liver damage. The alternate-day administration of gefitinib may be a suitable option for patients in whom daily gefitinib therapy induces liver damage.