Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study.

AIMS: Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCSs) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bed rest, to increase the patients' comfort, and to reduce vascular access-related complications. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single-shot PVI to the actual standard of care [figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)]. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at three German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge. A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation [109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; P < 0.001], shorter time to haemostasis [1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; P < 0.001], and shorter time to discharge eligibility [270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; P < 0.001]. No major vascular access-related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access-related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group [7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); P = 0.063] as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis, and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access-related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access-related complications.

Zero-fluoroscopy ablation with multielectrode pulse field ablation system: Case series.

Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation modality for treatment of atrial fibrillation. While mostly lacking 3D electroanatomical mapping integration, reported radiation doses in procedures using multielectrode PFA catheters are relatively high. We report a first case series of three patients where a zero-fluoroscopy approach by intracardiac echocardiography was utilized and present a possible workflow for zero-fluoroscopy ablation with the Farapulse PFA system.

Electrophysiological responses of the left atrial appendage during pulsed-field electrical isolation utilizing a novel device in a canine model.

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiological responses of the left atrial appendage (LAA) during pulsed-field electrical isolation have not been established. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the electrical responses of the LAA during pulsed-field electrical isolation using a novel device and their relations to acute isolation success. METHODS: Six canines were enrolled. The E-SeaLA™ device, which is able to perform LAA occlusion and ablation simultaneously, was deployed into the LAA ostium. LAA potentials (LAAp) were mapped via a mapping catheter, and the LAAp recovery time (LAAp RT, the time between the last pulsed spike and the first recovered LAAp) was measured after pulsed-train delivery. The initial pulse index (PI, corelated to pulsed-field intensity) was adjusted during the ablation procedure until LAAEI was achieved. Acute LAA electrical isolation (LAAEI) success was defined as LAAp disappearance or exit and entrance conduction block, confirmed through a drug test and a 60-minute waiting period. RESULT: All canines achieved successful LAA occlusion without peri-device leaks. Acute LAA electrical isolation (LAAEI) was achieved in five out of six canines (5/6, 83.3%). Very late LAAp recurrence (LAAp RT > 600 s) was observed during PFA. Early recurrence (LAAp RT < 30 s) was observed in two canines (2/6, 33.3%) post-PFA. Intermediate recurrence (LAAp RT ~ 120 s) was observed in three canines (3/6, 50%) post-PFA. The two canines with intermediate recurrence achieved LAAEI with higher PI ablations. The one canine with early LAAp recurrence had a peri-device leak and achieved LAAEI by the same PI after replacing with a larger size device and eliminating the peri-device leak. Another canine with early recurrence (1/6, 16.7%) failed to achieve LAAEI due to epicardial connection with persistent left superior vena cava. No coronary spasm, stenosis or other complications were observed. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that with proper device-tissue contact and pulse intensity, LAAEI can be achieved using this novel device without serious complications. The LAAp RT patterns observed in this study could inform and guide the adjustment of the ablation strategy.

Visualization of fibroblast activation using 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. 68Ga-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT targets FAP-alpha expressed by activated fibroblasts. We aimed to assess 68Ga-FAPI uptake in pulmonary veins as surrogate for ablation damage after PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS: 26 patients (15 PFA, 11 CBA) underwent 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT after ablation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and fibroblast-activation volumes of localized tracer uptake were assessed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. In PFA, focal FAPI uptake was only observed in 3/15 (20%) patients, whereas in the CBA cohort, 10/11 (90.9%) patients showed atrial visual uptake. We observed lower values of SUVmax (2.85 ± 0.56 vs 4.71 ± 2.06, P = 0.025) and FAV (1.13 ± 0.84 cm3 vs 3.91 ± 2.74 cm3, P = 0.014) along with a trend towards lower SUVpeak and SUVmean in PFA vs CBA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue response with respect to fibroblast activation seems to be less pronounced in PFA compared to established thermal ablation systems. This functional assessment might contribute to a better understanding of lesion formation in thermal and PFA ablation potentially contributing to better safety outcomes.

Determinants of acute irreversible electroporation lesion characteristics after pulsed field ablation: the role of voltage, contact, and adipose interference.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablative approach in which cardiomyocyte death is obtained through irreversible electroporation (IRE). Data correlating the biophysical characteristics of IRE and lesion characteristics are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different procedural parameters [voltage, number of cycles (NoCs), and contact] on lesion characteristics in a vegetal and animal model for IRE. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and four Russet potatoes were used. Pulsed field ablation lesions were delivered on 3 cm cored potato specimens using a multi-electrode circular catheter with its dedicated IRE generator. Different voltage (from 300 to 1200 V) and NoC (from 1 to 5×) protocols were used. The impact of 0.5 and 1 mm catheter-to-specimen distances was tested. A swine animal model was then used to validate the results observed in the vegetable model. The association between voltage, the NoCs, distance, and lesion depth was assessed through linear regression. An almost perfect linear association between lesion depth and voltage was observed (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001). A similarly linear relationship was observed between the NoCs and the lesion depth (R2 = 0.73; P < 0.001). Compared with controls at full contact, a significant dampening on lesion depth was observed at 0.5 mm distance (1000 V 2×: 2.11 ± 0.12 vs. 0.36 ± 0.04, P < 0.001; 2.63 ± 0.10 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08, P < 0.001). No lesions were observed at 1.0 mm distance. CONCLUSION: In a vegetal and animal model for IRE assessment, PFA lesion characteristics were found to be strongly dependent on voltage settings and the NoCs, with a quasi-linear relationship. The lack of catheter contact was associated with a dampening in lesion depth.

Pulsed Field Ablation-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Simplified Single-Access Single-Catheter Approach　- The Fast and Furious PFA Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy source with promising safety and efficacy advantages. We aimed to develop a convenient, safe, effective and fast method of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) utilizing a penta-spline PFA catheter via a single femoral vein and a venous closure system.Methods and Results: Consecutive patients (n=50; mean age: 63.6±10.7 years, 38% female) presenting with AF (paroxysmal AF: 56%) underwent first-time PVI via PFA. A single ultrasound-guided femoral vein puncture and a single transseptal puncture were used. After PVI using the penta-spline PFA catheter, extra pulse trains were added to the posterior wall for wide antral circumferential ablation. A venous closure system was used and a Donati suture was performed. The pressure bandage was removed after 1 h. A total of 196 PVs were identified and isolated with PFA only. The mean procedural time was 27.4±6.6 min, and the mean dwelling time was 14.4±5.5 min. Time to ambulation was 3.3±3.1 h. No severe complications occurred. During a mean follow-up of 6.5±2.1 months, 41/50 patients (82%) remained in sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a single venous puncture, single transseptal puncture approach using PFA and vascular closure device resulted in a 100% rate of acute PVI and an extraordinarily fast procedure and time to ambulation. The rate of periprocedural complications was low.

How the new technologies and tools will change the electrophysiology of the future.

Novel technologies and therapies are evolving rapidly in the field of electrophysiology and cardiac ablation, particularly with the aim of improving the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) where pharmacologic treatment fails. High-power short-duration radiofrequency (RF) ablation, in association with the optimized cooling process of the electrode-tissue interface, is one of the most promising approaches for treating durable lesions and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Cryo energy, laser, and RF current are examples of novel tools used by competitive balloon catheter platforms and these tools are specifically created to properly promote an effective PVI. Specific mention deserves to be made on the linear array ablation with ultra-low temperature cryoablation that appears promising for durable lesions. It is needless to remind here about the novel evolving energy source in the form of pulsed electrical field (PFA), which results in an irreversible electroporation of myocardial tissue, sparing the surrounding tissue, and thus, apparently with a significant reduction of potential untoward effects. Furthermore, intensive research is in place to specifically investigate the activation pattern of AF so as to devise a patient-('tailored') target ablation, although with inhomogeneous results. Overall, it seems that technologies and therapies are evolving so rapidly than ever with the hope of achieving better long-term clinical results and an improved quality of life for our patients.

Pulsed Field Ablation: a New Paradigm for Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current ablation approach for arrhythmias relies upon the use of radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation catheters. Although there have been significant advances both in catheter design and in energy delivery approaches, limitations such as suboptimal efficacy and safety remain. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel approach to ablation that is distinct from RF and cryoablation by virtue of selective ablation of myocardial tissue. Preclinical and clinical reports have demonstrated lesion durability with an excellent safety profile. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective randomized trials that are currently ongoing. In this review, we describe efficacy and safety outcomes from both pre-clinical and clinical studies that have been performed so far and briefly discuss ongoing clinical trials and future investigations. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from pre-clinical and clinical research have shown PFA as a promising tool for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. In addition to safety regarding mitigating the risk to surrounding structures such as the phrenic nerve, esophagus, PFA also offers an effective method for ablation. In this review, we summarize the currently published pre-clinical and clinical data evaluating the safety and efficacy of PFA for cardiac arrhythmias.

Use of pulse field ablation in the treatment of an atrial tachycardia: A case report.

This case illustrates the safety and efficacy of pulse field ablation (PFA) in the short and medium term. It could be used to isolate extra pulmonary sites including the posterior wall. PFA could be used in the treatment of atrial tachycardias both focal and reentrant in combination with ultrahigh density electroanatomic mapping. It is also important to understand that different catheter shapes are available and their use can be tailored to the targeted anatomical site.

Safety and feasibility of pulmonary vein isolation utilizing pulsed field ablation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and implanted Watchman devices.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel method of non-thermal cardiac ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Its use on patients with pre-existing Watchman devices has not been studied. METHODS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) utilizing PFA was performed in 7 patients with symptomatic AF and implanted Watchman devices. All cases were conducted at a single academic center. RESULTS: Successful PVI in patients with Watchman devices implanted at a median time of 534 days prior to the index ablation procedure (IQR 365 days) was achieved in all cases. No major adverse events (intraprocedural CVA, post-procedural CVA, major or minor bleeding events, device embolization, or cardiac tamponade) were observed. In 6 of 7 patients, a low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) strategy was implemented post-PFA. CONCLUSION: We present the first reported case series of PFA in patients with AF and implanted Watchman devices. This study highlights the safety and feasibility of the FARAPULSE PFA system in this patient population.

Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryotherapy Ablation, or Pulsed-Field Ablation to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Unresponsive to Pharmacological Treatments: Interpreting Efficacy Through Reconstruction of Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials.

Three techniques of catheter ablation (CA; radiofrequency, cryoballoon, and pulsed-field ablation) are available to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who do not adequately respond to pharmacological treatments. Our study was aimed at comparing these techniques based on the data of randomized studies because these are considered the best sources of efficacy data. After selecting pertinent trials, our analysis studied the time-to-event data published for these three techniques. An artificial intelligence method was used that reconstructs individual patient data from the Kaplan-Meier curves. The endpoint was an arrhythmia recurrence. A preliminary heterogeneity analysis was performed. Then, our main analysis was based on individual patient data reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier graphs. The hazard ratio (HR) was its main parameter. Three randomized trials were included. Our heterogeneity analysis confirmed an acceptable level of between-trial heterogeneity that allowed us to pool the curves from the different trials; however, cryoballoon ablation with a two-minute duration fared worse than the other techniques. Then, our main analysis estimated the following values of HR: pulsed-field ablation versus radiofrequency ablation, 0.549 (95%CI, 0.413-0.730; p<0.001); pulsed-field ablation versus cryoballoon ablation, 0.478 (95%CI, 0.364-0.633); radiofrequency ablation versus cryoballoon ablation, HR=0.871 (95%CI, 0.585-1.295; p=0.506). In conclusion, radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation showed similar effectiveness (except for the two-minute cryoballoon ablation, which fared worse). Our results showing the superiority of pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation must be interpreted with caution because the patients given pulsed-field ablation were limited, and their follow-up was shorter than that of patients receiving thermal ablation.

Efficacy of a surgical cardiac ablation clamp using nanosecond pulsed electric fields: An acute porcine model.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a recently developed nonthermal technology, nanosecond pulse-field ablation (nsPFA), for surgical ablation of the atria in a beating heart porcine model. METHODS: Six pigs underwent sternotomy and ablation using an nsPFA parallel clamp. The ablation electrodes (53 mm long) were embedded in the jaws of the clamp. Nine lesions per pig were created in locations chosen to be representative of the Cox-maze procedure. Four lesions were intended to electrically isolate parts of the atrium: the right atrial appendage, left atrial appendage, right pulmonary veins, and left pulmonary veins. For these lesions, exit block testing was performed both after ablation and before euthanasia; the time between the 2 tests was 3.3 ± 0.5 hours (range, 2-4 hours). Using purse string sutures, 5 more lesions were created up to the superior vena cava, down to the inferior vena cava, across the right atrial free wall, and at 2 distinct locations on the left atrial free wall. The clamp delivered a train of nanosecond duration pulses, with a total duration of 2.5 seconds, independent of tissue thickness. The heart tissue was stained with 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride after a dwelling period of 2 hours. Subsequently, each lesion was cross sectioned at 5-mm intervals to assess the ablation depth and transmurality. In some sections, transmurality could not be established on the basis of triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining alone; for these lesions, Gomori-trichrome stains were used, and the histologic sections were evaluated for transmurality. RESULTS: The ablation time was 2.5 seconds per lesion, for a total of only 22.5 seconds ablation time to create 9 lesions. A total of 53 lesions were created, resulting in 388 separate histologic sections. Transmurality was established in 386 sections (99.5%). Mean tissue thickness was 3.1 ± 1.5 mm (range, 0.2-8.6 mm). Exit block was confirmed in 23 of the 24 lesions (96%) postablation and 23 of 24 (96%) before the animals were humanely killed. Over the course of the procedure, neither pulse-induced arrhythmias nor any other complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The novel nsPFA clamp device was effective in creating acute conduction block and transmural lesions in both the right and left atria in an acute porcine model. This nonthermal energy source has great potential to both shorten procedural time and enable effective ablation in the beating heart.

Pulsed Field Energy in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: From Physical Principles to Clinical Applications.

Atrial fibrillation, representing the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacts stroke risk and cardiovascular mortality. Historically managed with antiarrhythmic drugs with limited efficacy, and more recently, catheter ablation, the interventional approach field is still evolving with technological advances. This review highlights pulsed field ablation (PFA), a revolutionary technique gaining prominence in interventional electrophysiology because of its efficacy and safety. PFA employs non-thermal electric fields to create irreversible electroporation, disrupting cell membranes selectively within myocardial tissue, thus preventing the non-selective damage associated with traditional thermal ablation methods like radiofrequency or cryoablation. Clinical studies have consistently shown PFA's ability to achieve pulmonary vein isolation-a cornerstone of AF treatment-rapidly and with minimal complications. Notably, PFA reduces procedure times and has shown a lower incidence of esophageal and phrenic nerve damage, two common concerns with thermal techniques. Emerging from oncological applications, the principles of electroporation provide a unique tissue-selective ablation method that minimizes collateral damage. This review synthesizes findings from foundational animal studies through to recent clinical trials, such as the MANIFEST-PF and ADVENT trials, demonstrating PFA's effectiveness and safety. Future perspectives point towards expanding indications and refinement of techniques that promise to improve AF management outcomes further. PFA represents a paradigm shift in AF ablation, offering a safer, faster, and equally effective alternative to conventional methods. This synthesis of its development and clinical application outlines its potential to become the new standard in AF treatment protocols.

Pulsed-field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: An indirect comparison of effectiveness among three proprietary devices conducted in the absence of randomized trials.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulsed-field ablation has been developed as an alternative to thermal ablation. Three devices are currently available: Farawave by Boston, PulseSelect by Medtronic, and Varipulse by Johnson. In the present report, we studied the outcomes at 12 months of these three devices using indirect comparisons. METHODS: A standard PubMed search was conducted that identified all studies evaluating these devices in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The endpoint was freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves were subjected to the IPDfromKM method that generated reconstructed patients. Standard time-to-event statistical testss (including heterogeneity assessment) were performed. RESULTS: Our analysis included 9 studies (8 single-arm and 1 randomized trial based on Farawave for a total of 1916 patients). A significant heterogeneity was found across the trials using Farawave because the outcomes found in the single-arm trials were better than those found in the randomized trial. Farawave (according exclusively to the results of the randomized trial), PulseSelect, and Varipulse showed a similar time-course of their respective outcomes with no significant difference. The single-arm trials using Farawave showed better outcomes than the randomized trial using Farawave and the pivotal trials using PulseSelect and Varipulse. DISCUSSION: Our study provided an updated overview of all the studies that have so far used pulsed-fileld ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Pulsed field ablation: A promising approach for ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been a central therapeutic strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, concerns about its long-term effectiveness and complications have arisen. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), characterized by its nonthermal, highly tissue-selective ablation technique, has emerged as a promising alternative. This comprehensive review delves into the potential advantages and opportunities presented by PFA in the realm of VT, drawing insights from both animal experimentation and clinical case studies. PFA shows promise in generating superior lesions within scarred myocardial tissue, and its inherent repetition dependency holds the potential to enhance therapeutic outcomes. Clinical cases underscore the promise of PFA for VT ablation. Despite its promising applications, challenges such as catheter maneuverability and proarrhythmic effects require further investigation. Large-scale, long-term studies are essential to establish the suitability of PFA for VT treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with high morbidity and mortality. AF treatment is guided by a patient-provider risk-benefit discussion regarding drug versus ablation or combination. Thermal ablation has a high rate of adverse events compared to pulsed field ablation (PFA). In this systematic review, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of PFA. METHODS: The electronic search for relevant articles in English was completed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane library, Scopus, and Embase databases till July 2022. The screening was completed via the use of Covidence software. The risk of bias assessment and data extraction from the included studies was performed, and the narrative synthesis was performed accordingly. RESULTS: A total of six studies were selected for review and 1897 patients receiving PFA were involved in these studies. Our review was focused on pulmonary vein isolation success, major adverse events, and arrhythmia recurrence. Successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was completed in 100% of cases except in two studies. In one of them, six out of seven patients (86%) in the epicardial cohort had successful PVI. In the MANIFEST-PF survey, the acute PVI success rate was 99.9%. The major complications were rare and included pericardial tamponade, vascular complications requiring surgery, and stroke. The atrial arrhythmia recurrence was higher in the thermal group than in the PFA group (39% vs. 11%). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of PVI by PFA is high, and major adverse events are low. PFA is found to decrease the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia compared to thermal ablation. Substantial randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of PFA over conventional methods.