No immunological changes after factor VIII product switch: An in depth analysis in haemophilia A patients.

BACKGROUND: A challenging complication in the treatment of haemophilia A is the formation of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (inhibitors). There is ongoing debate on the effect of FVIII product and inhibitor risk, rendering patients and physicians reluctant to switch FVIII-products. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate changes in the immune profile of haemophilia A patients after switching FVIII products and their possible relation to inhibitor development. Secondary, FVIII efficacy after switching were assessed. METHODS: Patients, who switched FVIII-products between 2017-2019, were included in this single centre cohort study. Prospective comparison of immunoregulatory cells and markers by flow-cytometry before and after the switch was performed in a subgroup. For the total cohort clinical data regarding inhibitor development and FVIII efficacy 1 year before and after switching were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: One-hundred patients (including 39 with prospective immunological assessment) were analyzed, of which 31% switched from plasma-derived (pdFVIII) to recombinant standard half-life FVIII (SHL-rFVIII), 47% between different SHL-rFVIII, and 22% from pdFVIII/SHL-rFVIII to rFVIII-Fc. No remarkable changes in immunoregulatory cell functions were observed after switching, regardless the type of switch. None of the patients developed an inhibitor. FVIII efficacy, that is, FVIII usage, half-life and annual bleeding rate (ABR), was similar before and after switch for the SHL products, whereas rFVIII-Fc associated with a longer half-life (13.1 vs. 15.0 h) and lower ABR (3.0 vs. 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a different FVIII product was not associated with inhibitor development, nor with differences in the immune profile. Switching to rFVIII-Fc lead to lower ABR.

Multicentre pharmacokinetic evaluation of rFVIII-Fc (efmoroctocog alfa) in a real life and comparison with non-extended half-life FVIII concentrates.

The use of enhanced half-life (EHL) FVIII has improved the quality of prophylaxis in haemophilia A, but with a benefit that may vary from one patient to another. We analysed the pharmacokinetic data obtained with efmoroctocog alfa (rFVIII-Fc) in 114 patients and, in 47 cases, compared them to those previously measured with non-EHL FVIII. The in vivo recovery (IVR) of rFVIII-Fc measured with one stage clotting assay (OSA) and chromogenic assay (CSA) was 2.2 and 2.8 IU/mL per IU/kg, respectively. The median half-life (T1/2 ) of rFVIII-Fc was 14.5 hours whatever the FVIII:C assay used, but variable and correlated with preinfusion VWF:Ag levels (r = .76). Both IVR and T1/2 were lower in patients under 12 years old (2.4 IU/mL per IU/kg and 11.1 hours, respectively; CSA). PK study of rFVIII-Fc vs non-EHL FVIII showed a T1/2 ratio of 1.4 in favour of rFVIII-Fc, regardless of the patient's age. However the relative increase in T1/2 with rFVIII-Fc was lower than 30% in one-third of patients evaluated, particularly when the previous FVIII administered was a BHK-derived product. This study therefore suggests that analysis of individual PK profile in response to a specific FVIII concentrate is potentially useful before a switch in haemophilia A patients.

Clinical Predictors and Prediction Models for rFVIII-Fc Half Life in Real-World People with Severe Hemophilia A.

The half life of recombinant factor VIII-Fc (rFVIII-Fc) for people with hemophilia A (PwHA) varies greatly. Understanding the factors influencing the variation and assessment of rFVIII-Fc half life is important for personalized treatment. Eighty-five severe-type PwHA with rFVIII-Fc treatment receiving an evaluation of half life by the Web-Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Service-Hemophilia during 2019-2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The 50-patient PK profiles before 2021 were used for analysis and developing prediction models of half life, and the 35-patient PK profiles in 2021 were used for external validation. The patients in the development cohort were aged 8-64, with a median rFVIII-Fc half life of 20.75 h (range, 8.25-41.5 h). By multivariate linear regression analysis, we found two, four, and five predictors of rFVIII-Fc half life for the blood groups non-O, O patients, and overall patients, respectively, including baseline VWF:Ag, BMI, VWF:activity/VWF:Ag ratio, body weight, O blood group, inhibitor history, HCV infection, and hematocrit. The three prediction equations of rFVIII-Fc half life (T) were respectively developed as T for non-O group patients = -0.81 + 0.63 × (BMI, kg/m2) + 6.07 × (baseline VWF:Ag, IU/mL), T for O group patients = -0.68 + 13.30 × (baseline VWF:Ag, IU/mL) + 0.27 × (BW, kg) - 1.17 × (BMI, kg/m2) + 16.02 × (VWF:activity/VWF:Ag ratio), and T for overall patients = -1.76 + 7.24 × (baseline VWF:Ag, IU/mL) - 3.84 × (Inhibitor history) + 2.99 × (HCV infection) - 2.83 × (O blood group) + 0.30 × (Hct, %), which explained 51.97%, 75.17%, and 66.38% of the half life variability, respectively. For external validation, there was a significant correlation between the predicted and observed half lives in the validation cohort. The median half life deviation was +1.53 h, +1.28 h, and +1.79 h for the equations of non-O group, O group, and overall group patients, respectively. In total, eight predictors influencing rFVIII-Fc half life were identified. Prediction equations of rFVIII-Fc half life were developed for the non-O and O blood groups and overall PwHA with a good degree of external validation. The equations could be applied to patients aged 8-64 without the need for PK blood sampling and clinically valuable for personalized therapy.