Serum progesterone is lower in ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG compared to recombinant FSH owing to a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does ovarian stimulation with highly purified (hp)-HMG protect from elevated progesterone in the follicular phase compared to recombinant FSH (r-FSH) cycles through a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis? SUMMARY ANSWER: hp-HMG enhanced the Δ4 pathway from pregnenolone to androstenodione leading to lower serum progesterone at the end of the cycle, while r-FSH promoted the conversion of pregnenolone to progesterone causing higher follicular phase progesterone levels. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Elevated progesterone in the follicular phase has been related to lower clinical outcome in fresh IVF cycles. Progesterone levels are positively correlated to ovarian response, and some studies have shown that when r-FSH alone is used for ovarian stimulation serum progesterone levels on the day of triggering are higher than when hp-HMG is given. Whether this is caused by a lower ovarian response in hp-HMG cycles or to a difference in follicular steroidogenesis in the two ovarian stimulation regimens has not been well characterized. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomized controlled trial including 112 oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonists and 225 IU/day of r-FSH (n = 56) or hp-HMG (n = 56) was carried out in a university-affiliated private infertility clinic. Subjects were recruited between October 2016 and June 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The women were aged 18-35 years with a regular menstrual cycle (25-35 days) and normal ovarian reserve (serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) = 10-30 pMol/l) undergoing ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation. FSH, LH, estradiol (E2), estrone, progesterone, pregnenolone, 17-OH-progesterone, androstenodione, dehidroepiandrostenodione, and testosterone were determined on stimulation Days 1, 4, 6, and 8 and on day of triggering in serum and in follicular fluid. Samples were frozen at -20°C until assay. Total exposures across the follicular phase were compared by polynomic extrapolation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Subjects in both groups were comparable in terms of age, BMI, and AMH levels. Ovarian response was also similar: 17.5 ± 7.9 (mean ± SD) versus 16.5 ± 7.5 oocytes with r-FSH and hp-HMG, respectively (P = 0.49). Serum progesterone (ng/ml) on day of trigger was 0.46 ± 0.27 in the hp-HMG group versus 0.68 ± 0.50 in the r-FSH group (P = 0.010). Differences for progesterone were also significant on stimulation days 6 and 8. The pregnenolone: progesterone ratio was significantly increased in the r-FSH group from stimulation day 8 to the day of trigger (P = 0.019). Serum androstenodione (ng/ml) on day of trigger was 3.0 ± 1.4 in the hp-HMG group versus 2.4 ± 1.1 in the r-FSH group (P = 0.015). Differences in adrostenodione were also significant on stimulation Day 8. The pregnenolone:androstenodione ratio was significantly higher in the hp-HMG group (P = 0.012) on Days 6 and 8 and trigger. There were no other significant differences between groups. Follicular fluid E2, FSH, LH, dehidroepioandrostenodione, androstenodione, and testosterone were significantly higher in the hp-HMG than r-FSH group. No differences were observed for progesterone, estrone, 17-OH-progesterone, and pregnenolone in follicular fluid. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: All women included in the study were young, not infertile, and had a normal BMI and a good ovarian reserve. The findings might be different in other patient subpopulations. Hormone analyses with immunoassays are subject to intra-assay variations that may influence the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Stimulation with hp-HMG may prevent progesterone elevation at the end of the follicular phase because of a different follicular steroidogenesis pathway, regardless of ovarian response. This should be considered, particularly in patients at risk of having high progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase when a fresh embryo transfer is planned. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Roche Diagnostics provided unrestricted funding for all serum and follicular fluid hormone determinations. J.L.R., M.M., and A.P. have nothing to declare. E.B. has received consulting fees from Ferring, Merck, Gedeon Richter, and Roche and has participated in a research cooperation with Gedeon-Richter. In addition, the author has participated in speakers' bureau and received fees from Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Merck, and Roche. P.A. has received consulting fees from MSD and has participated in speakers' bureau and received fees from Ferring. P.A. also declares travel/meeting support from MSD. E.L. has received consulting fees from Ferring and MSD. In addition, the author has participated in a research cooperation with Gedeon-Richter. Also, the author has participated in speakers' bureau and received fees from Ferring and IBSA, as well as travel/meeting support from IBSA and Gedeon Richter. E.B., P.A., and E.L. also own stocks in IVIRMA Valencia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT: NCT02738580. TRIAL REGISTER DATE: 19 February 2016. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 03 October 2016.

The ovarian stimulation regimen does not affect aneuploidy or blastocyst rate.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Could the total dose (<3000 IU or ≥3000 IU) and type of exogenous gonadotrophin (i.e. recombinant FSH and/or human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG]) influence aneuploidy and blastulation rates and produce different reproductive outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study included a total of 8466 patients undergoing IVF using autologous oocytes and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Participants were divided according to the dosage of total gonadotrophins and stratified by maternal age. RESULTS: The aneuploidy rates, pregnancy outcomes and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) were similar among women who received total gonadotrophin dosages of <3000 or ≥3000 IU. No statistical differences were reported in the blastulation rate with lower or higher gonadotrophin dosages. Women receiving a higher amount of HMG during ovarian stimulation had a lower aneuploidy rate (P = 0.02); when stratified according to age, younger women with a higher HMG dosage had lower aneuploidy rates (P< 0.001), while no statistical differences were observed in older women with higher or lower HMG dosages. No significant differences were observed in IVF outcomes or CLBR. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of gonadotrophins were not associated with rate of aneuploidy. However, an increased fraction of HMG in younger women was associated with a lower aneuploidy rate. The study demonstrated that the total gonadotrophin dosage did not influence aneuploidy, reproductive outcomes or CLBR. The increased gonadotrophin and HMG dosages used for ovarian stimulation did not precede aneuploidy, and the use of HMG should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, according to the individual's characteristics and infertility type.

A direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

PURPOSE: We have previously published a retrospective matched-case control study comparing the effect of recombinant LH (r-hLH) versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) supplementation on the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The result from that study showed that the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was significantly higher in the r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p = 0.02). In this study, we aim to do a cost analysis between these two groups based on our previous study. METHODS: The analysis consisted of 425 IVF and ICSI cycles in our previous study. There were 259 cycles in the r-hFSH + hMG group and 166 cycles in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group. The total cost related to the treatment of each patient was recorded. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) were performed and created. RESULTS: The total treatment cost per patient was significantly higher in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group than in the r-hFSH + hMG group ($4550 ± 798.86 vs. $4290 ± 734.6, p = 0.003). However, the mean cost per live birth in the r-hFSH + hMG group was higher at $8052, vs. $7059 in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group. The CEAC showed that treatment with hFSH + r-hLH proved to be more cost-effective than treatment with r-hFSH + hMG. Willingness-to-pay was evident when considering a hypothetical threshold of $18,513, with the r-hFSH + r-hLH group exhibiting a 99% probability of being considered cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The cost analysis showed that recombinant LH is more cost-effective than hMG supplementation on r-hFSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Introduce an optimal method of ovarian stimulation in the polycystic ovarian syndrome affected: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, optimal method of ovarian stimulation (OS) to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in the patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is unknown. The present research aims to study the efficiency of minimal-OS method in treatment of infertile patients with PCOS and also the effect of gonadotropin type (recombinant FSH (r-FSH) vs. urinary Human menopausal gonadotropin (u-HMG)) on treatment cycles with GnRH-antagonist. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, a total of 120 eligible patients were randomly allocated into four groups of OS to IVF: minimal-OS with r-FSH, minimal-OS with u-HMG, mild-OS with r-FSH and mild-OS with u-HMG. IVF outcomes of groups were analyzed statically. RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences among groups regarding stimulation duration (p < 0.0001), number of retrieved oocytes (p < 0.0001), number of obtained embryos (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in fertilization rate (p = 0.289) and implantation rate (p = 0.757) among our participants. There were also significant differences among these four groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (/ET and /cycles) (p < 0.0001, p = 0.021, respectively) and live birth rate/cycles (p < 0.0001). Also cases of freeze all embryos due to prevention of ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS) (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of present results the minimal-OS with u-HMG may be one of optimal methods of control OS in the patients with PCOS in respect to serum levels of estradiol on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, total dose of prescribed gonadotropin, the optimal number of oocytes and embryos obtained, rate of clinical pregnancy and the incidence of OHSS risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT03876145. Registered 15/03/2019. Retrospectively registered, http://www. CLINICALTRIAL: gov/ NCT03876145.

Insights into ovarian response with a fixed low dose FSH stimulation in an IUI programme: the PRORAILS study.

STUDY QUESTION: Are patients' characteristics, such as anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and BMI, reliable factors to predict ovarian response in couples with unexplained subfertility undergoing IUI with ovarian hyperstimulation (IUI-OH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: We observed no solid relationship between serum AMH and ovarian response. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ovarian stimulation during IUI treatment could lead to a higher chance of pregnancy, but also a higher incidence of multiple pregnancies, unless strict cancellation criteria are being used. Several factors could influence the result of the stimulation, such as age, BMI and hormonal status of the female. In IVF treatment, AMH has shown to be a useful predictor of ovarian stimulation to optimize the outcome; however, in a milder stimulation protocol, such as IUI, this has not been investigated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a prospective cohort study and evaluated the first IUI stimulation cycle of 492 patients. The study was conducted between 2012 and 2017. Follow-up ended if patients were not pregnant after the first cycle. If pregnancy did occur, follow-up lasted until delivery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: PRORAILS is a large multicentre nationwide cohort study executed in the Netherlands. Eligible women aged 18-43 years who were diagnosed with unexplained subfertility or mild male subfertility according to the Dutch guideline, with a regular indication for IUI-OH, were asked to participate. Ovarian response was assessed using a transvaginal ultrasound 5-7 days after initiation of the stimulation and was repeated according to the size of the leading follicles. Ovarian response was defined as optimal or suboptimal based on the total number of dominant follicles >15 mm. A successful stimulation was defined as the presence of two to three follicles >15 mm on the day of hCG administration. Serum AMH (µg/l) was measured by ELISA, and samples were taken on day 2, 3 or 4 of the menstrual cycle. Poisson regression was used to estimate the risk of a suboptimal ovarian response. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 492 participants, the mean age was 33 years and the mean subfertility duration was 2.5 years. The median serum AMH was 2.1 (µg/l). The majority of patients had a suboptimal response: 326 women (66%), of whom 224 (45%) had a hypo response (defined as 15 mm) and 102 (21%) had a hyper response (defined as more than three follicles sized >15 mm). The lowest AMH category showed a trend towards a smaller risk of a suboptimal response (relative risk ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.54, 1.06)), but this effect did not reach statistical significance. In the prediction models, BMI and serum basal FSH were significant predictors of a hypo response, while for hyper response the factors age, BMI and serum FSH were significant. A higher BMI showed a higher risk for hypo response, as did a higher FSH whereas a lower BMI and lower FSH showed a higher risk for hyper response. The addition of AMH to the models did not improve the predictive abilities. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the study was prospective, the main analyses were cross-sectional with characteristics measured at one time-point. The study was not powered to provide insight into predictors of pregnancy and live births and, therefore, the result for pregnancy should be interpreted with caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This was the first large multicentre study that investigated the characteristics of ovarian response categories using standardized methods and centrally analysed laboratory measures. PRORAILS is a nationwide study with 15 hospitals and, therefore, these results are generalizable to other hospitals in the Netherlands. This study provides high-quality outcomes advancing the subfertility research field. Future studies would benefit from a randomized design investigating the effectiveness of an individualized approach versus a fixed dose. Also, the relation between a good ovarian stimulation and pregnancy rate could be further investigated. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The PRORAILS study is sponsored by Merck B.V., Schiphol-Rijk, the Netherlands, an affiliation of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (EMR700623_612). Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, reviewed the manuscript prior to submission. The opinions remain those of the authors. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, had no influence on the use of medication in this study. The recombinant FSH was mostly provided by Merck B.V. or MSD. F.B. is a member of the external advisory board for Merck B.V., Schiphol-Rijk, the Netherlands, and has received a research grant from Merck B.V., Schiphol-Rijk. H.v.B. is an employee from IQVIA, which is a commercial data-analysing company, and received payment for her part in the article. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01662180.

Reduced FSH and LH action: implications for medically assisted reproduction.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) play complementary roles in follicle development and ovulation via a complex interaction in the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary gland, reproductive organs, and oocytes. Impairment of the production or action of gonadotropins causes relative or absolute LH and FSH deficiency that compromises gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production, thereby reducing fertility. In women, LH and FSH deficiency is a spectrum of conditions with different functional or organic causes that are characterized by low or normal gonadotropin levels and low oestradiol levels. While the causes and effects of reduced LH and FSH production are very well known, the notion of reduced action has received less attention by researchers. Recent evidence shows that molecular characteristics, signalling as well as ageing, and some polymorphisms negatively affect gonadotropin action. These findings have important clinical implications, in particular for medically assisted reproduction in which diminished action determined by the afore-mentioned factors, combined with reduced endogenous gonadotropin production caused by GnRH analogue protocols, may lead to resistance to gonadotropins and, thus, to an unexpected hypo-response to ovarian stimulation. Indeed, the importance of LH and FSH action has been highlighted by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ICMART) in their definition of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism as gonadal failure associated with reduced gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production due to reduced gonadotropin production or action. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of determinants of reduced FSH and LH action that are associated with a reduced response to ovarian stimulation.

Fully human glyco-optimized recombinant FSH (follitropin epsilon) - a randomized, comparator-controlled phase II clinical trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The study aimed to determine the standard treatment dose of follitropin epsilon for ovarian stimulation in the context of IVF treatment. DESIGN: A total of 247 women aged 18-37 years were treated with either 52.5, 75, 112.5 or 150 IU follitropin epsilon daily, or 150 IU every other day, or 150 IU follitropin alfa daily in a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol. The study was performed as a randomized, assessor-blinded, comparator-controlled, six-armed phase II trial in eight fertility clinics in two European countries. RESULTS: The primary results were as follow. First, none of the doses of follitropin epsilon showed superiority for the main outcome measure, i.e. number of follicles ≥12 mm in size. Follitropin epsilon 75 IU produced results most similar to those of follitropin alfa 150 IU. In terms of secondary results, stronger effects of follitropin epsilon 112.5 IU compared with follitropin alfa 150 IU were seen for secondary outcome measures such as hormone concentrations (oestradiol, inhibin B and progesterone) and oocyte number. CONCLUSIONS: Follitropin epsilon 75 IU daily results in a similar ovarian response to a standard dose of 150 IU follitropin alfa. This dose could be tested in a phase III trial.

Gene expression profiles of human granulosa cells treated with bioequivalent doses of corifollitropin alfa (CFA) or recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH).

Using recombinant DNA technologies, a chimeric gene containing the coding sequences of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ß-subunit and C-terminal peptide of the human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) ß-subunit have been designed to generate a new gonadotrophin named corifollitropin alfa (CFA). CFA has longer elimination half-life and slower rate of absorption compared with FSH, which makes CFA a long-acting hormone employed as a substitute of the recombinant FSH (recFSH) in the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). The purpose of this study is to compare the gene expression profiles elicited by bioequivalent doses of CFA or recFSH in primary cultures of human granulosa cells (hGCs). Gonadotrophins exert their functions by binding FSH receptors (FSHRs), activating signaling pathways that increase the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) intracellular content. Bioequivalence has been defined as the dose/duration of gonadotrophin treatment able to promote the same amount of intracellular cAMP. hGCs were treated with different doses of either gonadotrophin and the cAMP was measured after different incubation times to establish the bioequivalence. Results obtained by comparing the bioequivalent treatments, showed that CFA is more effective than recFSH in inducing aromatase gene expression after 6 and 24 h from the initial stimulation in agreement with its long-acting characteristic.

Finding a place for corifollitropin within the PIVET FSH dosing algorithms.

PIVET recombinant FSH (rFSH) dosing algorithms have been designed for rFSH injection pens, providing optimal pregnancy and live birth productivity rates whilst minimizing risk and occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Recently, long-acting recombinant gonadotrophin corifollitropin (Elonva) was approved for use in assisted reproduction, and welcomed by patients as the single injection allowed ovarian stimulation over 7 days without need for multiple injections. Consequently, another rFSH dosing algorithm was devised to incorporate Elonva, and these cycles were compared to standard rFSH agents, Gonal-f and Puregon. Initiated Elonva cycles (n = 165) were compared with 972 cycles initiated with standard rFSH. Elonva replaced standard rFSH dosages across the 200-400 IU range, but provided equivalent oocyte retrieval numbers and live birth outcomes. Elonva is considered risky for women whose antral follicle count is ≥20 follicles, and was inadvertently administered contra-protocol in 19 cycles with ≥20 follicles. However, while oocyte retrieval numbers were higher, raising risk for OHSS, no actual cases ensued. Taken together, this indicated that Elonva was equivalent to standard rFSH stimulation, and consequently has been added to the rFSH algorithms for medium to lower antral follicle counts and represented by green colour coding in the existing PIVET algorithmic charts.

Does ovarian stimulation regimen affect IVF outcome? a two-centre, real-world retrospective study using predominantly cleavage-stage, single embryo transfer.

In this study, ovarian stimulation using highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) for IVF were compared in two large assisted reproduction technique centres in Sweden. A total of 5902 women underwent 9631 oocyte retrievals leading to 8818 embryo transfers (7720 on day 2): single embryo transfers (74.2%); birth rate per embryo transfer (27.7%); multiple birth rate (5.0%); incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (0.71%). Compared with ovarian stimulation with rFSH, women who received HP-HMG were older, had higher dosages of gonadotrophins administered, fewer oocytes retrieved and more embryos transferred. After multivariate analysis controlling for age and generalized estimating equation model, no differences were found in delivery outcomes per embryo transfers between HP-HMG and rFSH, independent of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) used. Logit curves for live birth rate suggested differences for various subgroups, most prominently for women with high oocyte yield or when high total doses were used. Differences were not significant, perhaps owing to skewed distributions of the FSH compounds versus age and other covariates. These 'real-life patients' had no differences in live birth rate between HP-HMG and rFSH overall or in subgroups of age, embryo score, ovarian sensitivity or use of GnRH analogue regimen.

Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: what does serum FSH say?

STUDY QUESTION: Do serum FSH levels on day of hCG trigger differ between women with a poor, normal or hyper response to a fixed daily dose of 150 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is no consistent relationship between ovarian response and serum FSH levels on day of hCG trigger in a 150 IU fixed dose treatment protocol. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: When ovarian response to stimulation for IVF/ICSI is suboptimal, the FSH dose is often adjusted in a subsequent cycle, thereby assuming that serum FSH levels were inadequate for optimal stimulation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Nested cohort study within a randomized controlled trial conducted at the University Medical Centre Utrecht between March 2009 and July 2011. Blood was drawn from 124 women on cycle Day 2 and on day of hCG triggering. Serum FSH level was determined by the Beckman-Coulter Unicel DXi800 chemiluminescence assay. In order to detect a difference of 2 IU/L between poor, normal and hyper responders, a total of 64 participants (16 poor, 32 normal and 16 hyper responders) would provide 80% power, assuming a standard deviation of 2 and an alpha of 0.05. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: Women aged ≤39 years with a regular cycle and fixed FSH dose of 150 IU. Exclusion criteria: BMI > 32 kg/m2 and >2 previous unsuccessful IVF/ICSI cycles. The primary outcome measure was serum FSH level on day of triggering. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Median [range] body weight was 70.0 kg [55.0-85.6], 68.0 kg [52.0-94] and 60.6 kg [51.0-78.0] for poor (n = 16), normal (n = 94) and hyper (n = 17) responders, respectively. Mean (SD) serum FSH levels on day of triggering were 9.5 IU/L (2.4) in poor, 10.4 IU/L (2.3) in normal and 11.5 IU/L (2.2) in hyper responders. Serum FSH levels on day of hCG in poor responders differed significantly as compared to those in hyper responders (P = 0.03). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The number of retrieved oocytes is only minimally determined by serum FSH level on the day of hCG trigger. After correction for age, body weight, basal serum FSH and basal anti-Mullerian hormone the correlation between serum FSH level on the day of hCG and ovarian response regarding the number of retrieved oocytes disappeared. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The current study shows that a poor response is not related to inadequate serum FSH levels per se. One could therefore question whether increasing the rFSH dose in women with a suboptimal response is meaningful. In women with a hyper response, however, lowering the dose of rFSH in a subsequent IVF cycle may lead to lower serum FSH levels and thereby mitigate ovarian response and improve safety of the IVF treatment. As this was not a dose-response study, future research should assess whether dose adjustments benefit the poor and hyper responder. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funds were obtained for this study. S.C.O, T.C.v.T., O.H., H.L.T., E.G.W.M.L., C.B.L. and M.J.C.E. have nothing to disclose. F.J.M.B. receives monetary compensation: member of the external advisory board for Merck Serono and Ferring, the Netherlands; educational activities for Ferring BV, the Netherlands; consultancy work for Gedeon Richter, Belgium; strategic cooperation with Roche on automated AMH assay development and research cooperation with Ansh Labs.

Production of biologically active recombinant goose FSH in a single chain form with a CTP linker sequence.

FSH is a glycoprotein hormone secreted by the pituitary gland that is essential for gonadal development and reproductive function. In avian reproduction study, especially in avian reproduction hormone study, it is hindered by the lack of biologically active FSH. In order to overcome this shortcoming, we prepared recombinant goose FSH as a single chain molecule and tested its biological activities in the present study. Coding sequences for mature peptides of goose FSH α and ß subunits were amplified from goose pituitary cDNA. A chimeric gene containing α and ß subunit sequences linked by the hCG carboxyl terminal peptide coding sequence was constructed. The recombinant gene was inserted into the pcDNA3.1-Fc eukaryotic expression vector to form pcDNA-Fc-gFSHß-CTP-α and then transfected into 293-F cells. A recombinant, single chain goose FSH was expressed and verified by SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis, and was purified using Protein A agarose affinity and gel filtration chromatography. Biological activity analysis results showed that the recombinant, chimeric goose FSH possesses the function of stimulating estradiol secretion and cell proliferation, in cultured chicken granulosa cells. These results indicated that bioactive, recombinant goose FSH has been successfully prepared in vitro. The recombinant goose FSH will have the potential of being used as a research tool for studying avian reproductive activities, and as a standard for developing avian FSH bioassays.

Impact of gonadotropin type on progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Does hormonal stimulation with corifollitropin alpha (CFA) only, mimicking a step down protocol, result in lower incidence of progesterone elevation on the day of hCGtrigger as compared to sustained stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The current findings support the concept that sustained FSH stimulus contributes to premature progesterone elevation in stimulated IVF cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment seems to be related to a poorer reproductive outcome. However, the mechanism by which the rise in progesterone is caused is not yet fully understood. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was a post hoc analysis of data from two multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority trials, ENGAGE and PURSUE, conducted from June 2006 to January 2008 and from July 2010 to October 2012 respectively. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the ENGAGE-study, 1506 women, aged 18-36 years, were allocated to either a single injection of 150 mg CFA or daily injections of 200 IU rFSH in the first week of stimulation, using a standard GnRH antagonist protocol. In the PURSUE-study, a total of 1390 women, aged 35-42 years, were allocated to either a single injection of 150 mg of CFA or daily 300 IU of rFSH for the first week, again using a standard GnRH antagonist protocol. In both trials, daily rFSH was continued until three follicles reached >17 mm in size. All women had a body weight of between 50 and 90 kg, regular menstrual cycles and an indication for ovarian stimulation before IVF. The incidence of progesterone elevation on day of hCG-trigger in patients with CFA only or rFSH stimulation, and triggered on Day 8 of stimulation, was analyzed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of patients with CFA only stimulation, 5.4% (13/239 patients) showed a progesterone elevation above 1.5 ng/ml on day of hCG-trigger, whereas patients with rFSH stimulation had a significant higher incidence of progesterone elevation (18.3%; 62/339 patients) (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Post hoc analysis of data from previously published trials could be considered as a reason for caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Future studies should evaluate whether it would be possible to prevent a premature progesterone rise in cycles stimulated with daily FSH by using a step down protocol towards the end of the follicular phase. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Financial/Material Support was provided by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Davis Gates is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA and may own stock and/or hold stock options in the company. Fabiola Beligotti is an employee of MSD, Italy, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA and may own stock and/or hold stock options in the company. Barbara Lawrenz, Nils Engelmann and Human M. Fatemi have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ENGAGE study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NTC00696800. PURSUE-study: NCT01144416.

Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in intrauterine insemination cycles in women ≥35 years: a RCT.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the treatment with recombinant FSH (rFSH) plus recombinant LH (rLH) more effective than highly purified (HP)-hMG in terms of ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) in women ≥35 years of age undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: The ongoing PR was not significantly different in women treated with rFSH plus rLH or with HP-hMG. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although previous studies have shown beneficial effects of the addition of LH activity to FSH, in terms of PR in patients aged over 34 years having ovulation induction, no studies have compared two different gonadotrophin preparations containing LH activity in women ≥35 years of age in IUI cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single-centre RCT was performed between May 2012 and September 2013 with 579 women ≥35 years of age undergoing IUI cycles. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups, rFSH in combination with rLH group or HP-hMG (Meropur) group, by giving them a code number from a computer generated randomization list, in order of enrolment. The randomization visit took place on the first day of ovarian stimulation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-nine patients with unexplained infertility or mild male factor undergoing IUI cycles were recruited in a university hospital setting. All women were enrolled in this study only for one cycle of treatment. Five hundred and seventy-nine cycles were included in the final analysis. Two hundred and ninety patients were treated with rFSH in combination with rLH and 289 patients were treated with HP-hMG. The ovarian stimulation cycle started on the third day of the menstrual cycle and the starting gonadotrophin doses used were 150 IU/day of rFSH plus 150 IU/day of rLH or 150 IU/day of HP-hMG. The drug dose was adjusted according to the individual follicular response. A single IUI per cycle was performed 34-36 h after hCG injection. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The main outcome measures were ongoing PR and number of interrupted cycles for high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Ongoing pregnancy rates were 48/290 (17.3%) in the recombinant group versus 35/289 (12.2%) in the HP-hMG group [(odds ratio (OR) 1.50, 95% CI 0.94-2.41, P = 0.09]. The number of interrupted cycles for high risk of OHSS was 13/290 (4.5%) in the rFSH plus rLH group and 2/289 (0.7%) in the HP-hMG group (OR 6.73, 95% CI 1.51-30.12, P = 0.013). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: One of the limitations of this study was the early closure and the ongoing PR could be overestimated. Both patient and gynaecologist were informed of the assigned treatment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results demonstrated the lack of differences in terms of ongoing PR between recombinant product and HP-hMG, in women ≥35 years undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. HP-hMG was safer than recombinant gonadotrophin concerning the risk of OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01604044.

Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does substituting 150 µg corifollitropin alfa for 450 IU follitropin beta during the first 7 days of ovarian stimulation in proven poor responders, result in retrieval of a non-inferior number (<1.5 fewer) of cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A single s.c. dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa on the first day of ovarian stimulation, followed if necessary, from Day 8 onwards, with 450 IU of follitropin beta/day, is not inferior to daily doses of 450 IU follitropin beta. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1 within the safety margin of 1.5. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Recent data from retrospective studies suggest that the use of corifollitropin alfa in poor responders is promising since it could simplify ovarian stimulation without compromising its outcome. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Seventy-nine women with previous poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI treatment were enrolled in this open label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: previous poor response to ovarian stimulation (≤4 COCs) after maximal stimulation, age <45 years, regular spontaneous menstrual cycle, body mass index: 18-32 kg/m(2) and basal follicle stimulating hormone ≤20 IU/l. On Day 2 of the menstrual cycle, patients were administered either a single s.c dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa (n = 40) or a fixed daily dose of 450 IU of follitropin beta (n = 39). In the corifollitropin alfa group, 450 IU of follitropin beta were administered from Day 8 of stimulation until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration, if necessary. To inhibit premature luteinizing hormone surge, the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix was used. Triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed using 250 µg of recombinant hCG, when at least two follicles reached 17 mm in mean diameter. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The number of COCs retrieved was not statistically different between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta groups [Median 3 versus 2, 95% CI 2-4, 2-3, respectively, P = 0.26]. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1. A multivariable analysis adjusting for all the potential baseline differences confirmed this finding. No significant difference was observed regarding the probability of live birth between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta group (live birth per patient reaching oocyte retrieval: 7.9 versus 2.6%, respectively, difference +5.3%, 95% CI: -6.8 to +18.3). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The present study was not powered to test a smaller difference (e.g. 1 COC) in terms of COCs retrieved as well as to show potential differences in the probability of pregnancy. Moreover, it would be interesting to assess whether the continuation of stimulation in the long acting FSH arm, where necessary, with 200 IU instead of 450 IU of follitropin beta would have altered the direction or the magnitude of the effect of the type of FSH, observed on the number of COCs retrieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Corifollitropin alfa simplifies IVF treatment because it is administered in a GnRH antagonist protocol and replaces seven daily FSH injections with a single one of a long acting FSH without compromising the outcome. It could greatly reduce the burden of treatment for poor responders and this deserves further investigation.

Change of anti-Mullerian-hormone levels during follicular phase in PCOS patients.

Anti-Mullerian-hormone (AMH) does not seem to fluctuate significantly during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. However, little is known about cycle fluctuations of AMH levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The purpose of this study was to examine AMH fluctuations during the follicular phase in PCOS patients receiving antiestrogens or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). About 40 PCOS patients diagnosed according to Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group 2003 and 19 controls were prospectively enrolled. PCOS patients received either antiestrogens or recombinant FSH for monoovulation induction and controls received antiestrogens. AMH levels were determined (1) between the 2nd and the 5th day of follicular phase and (2) when a single large dominant follicle ≥18 mm had appeared. Our study shows that AMH levels do not change during follicular development in controls as well as in PCOS patients with AMH levels < 5 ng/ml, irrespective of antiestrogen or FSH therapy. However, in PCOS patients with AMH levels ≥5 ng/ml, AMH declines significantly during follicular development (p < 0.01). We conclude that AMH levels should be determined in the early follicular phase in PCOS patients without the influence of antiestrogens or exogenous FSH, because these interventions may lower AMH values in patients with high levels.

Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.

STUDY QUESTION: Can predictors of low and high ovarian responses be identified in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in a GnRH antagonist protocol? SUMMARY ANSWER: Common prognostic factors for high and low ovarian responses were female age, antral follicle count (AFC) and basal serum FSH and LH. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Predictors of ovarian response have been identified in GnRH agonist protocols. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists to prevent premature LH rises during COS, and the gradual shift in use of long GnRH agonist to short GnRH antagonist protocols, there is a need for data on the predictability of ovarian response in GnRH antagonist cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective analysis of data from the Engage trial and validation with the Xpect trial. Prognostic models were constructed for high (>18 oocytes retrieved) and low (<6 oocytes retrieved) ovarian response. Model building was based on the recombinant FSH (rFSH) arm (n = 747) of the Engage trial. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed in a stepwise fashion (P < 0.15 for entry). Validation based on calibration was performed in patients with equivalent treatment (n = 199) in the Xpect trial. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile women with an indication for COS prior to IVF. The Engage and Xpect trials included patients of similar ethnic origins from North America and Europe who had regular menstrual cycles. The main causes of infertility were male factor, tubal factor and endometriosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the Engage trial, 18.3% of patients had a high and 12.7% had a low ovarian response. Age, AFC, serum FSH and serum LH at stimulation Day 1 were prognostic for both high and low ovarian responses. Higher AFC and LH were associated with an increased chance of high ovarian response. Older age and higher FSH correlated with an increased chance of low ovarian response. Region (North America/Europe) and BMI were prognostic for high ovarian response, and serum estradiol at stimulation Day 1 was associated with low ovarian response. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the model for a high ovarian response was 0.82. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 and 0.73; positive and negative predictive values were 0.40 and 0.95, respectively. The AUC for the model for a low ovarian response was 0.80. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.73, respectively; positive and negative predictive values were 0.29 and 0.96, respectively. In Xpect, 19.1% of patients were high ovarian responders and 16.1% were low ovarian responders. The slope of the calibration line was 0.81 and 1.35 for high and low ovarian responses, respectively, both not statistically different from 1.0. In summary, common prognostic factors for high and low ovarian responses were female age, AFC and basal serum FSH and LH. Simple multivariable models are presented that are able to predict both a too low or too high ovarian response in patients treated with a GnRH antagonist protocol and daily rFSH. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Anti-Müllerian hormone was not included in the prediction modelling. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings will help with the identification of patients at risk of a too high or too low ovarian response and individualization of COS treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Financial support for this study and the editorial work was provided by Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. F.J.B. received a grant from CVZ to his institution; P.J.M.V. and H.W. are employees of MSD, and B.M.J.L.M. was an employee of MSD at the time of development of this manuscript. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT 00696800 and NCT00778999.

Predictive markers for the FSH sensitivity of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

STUDY QUESTION: Do parameters which are involved in pathogenesis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) predict the dosage of recombinant FSH required to achieve monofollicular development for ovulation induction? SUMMARY ANSWER: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) appeared to be an independent predictor of the required dosage of FSH to achieve monofollicular development for ovulation induction in a study sample of clomiphene-resistant PCOS patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AMH plays a key role in the pathogenesis of PCOS. This is the first study that has evaluated the association between AMH and the required FSH dosage to achieve the development of a large follicle of at least 18 mm, in the presence of additional predictors of ovarian responsiveness. In the few studies to date which have evaluated predictors of ovarian responsiveness in PCOS patients, fasting insulin has been shown to be a significant predictor. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 48 infertile PCOS patients aged 18-43 years were enrolled in this prospective, observational study between 2009 and 2013. Study participants received between one and six cycles of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH using a step-up protocol. The mean total FSH dosage per cycle for reaching a monofollicular development for ovulation induction was evaluated to investigate its association with AMH, LH, FSH, LH/FSH-ratio, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), androstendione, testosterone, free testosterone index, antral follicle count, ovarian volume, body mass index (BMI) and the age of patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We used AMH-Gen-II ELISA (Beckman Coulter, Immunotech, Webster, TX, USA) for the assessment of AMH levels. Crude and multiple linear regression models were fitted to explore potential predictors of the required FSH dosage. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: An interquartile range (IQR) increase in AMH was associated with a 51.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.7-79.0%; P = 0.0003] increase in the mean total FSH dosage per cycle (in IU) in a crude regression model, corresponding to a 7.2% increase in the mean total FSH dosage per cycle per ng/ml AMH. Adjustment for BMI augmented the effect of AMH, with a 58.3% (95% CI: 33.2-84.2%; P = 1.8 × 10(-5)) increase in FSH dosage per IQR AMH (corresponding to an 8.2% increase per ng/ml AMH) and a 46.2% (95% CI: 16.5-76.6%; P = 0.003) increase per IQR BMI (corresponding to a 3.7% increase per kg/m(2)). AMH was the only independent variable for which the effect on FSH dosage was statistically significant in the crude regression model as well as after adjustment for other promising predictors. The association of BMI with FSH dosage was statistically significant while adjusted for AMH, but not in the crude model. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The impact of metabolic parameters such as insulin resistance on the reported association between AMH and FSH dosage was not assessed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Knowledge about the predictors of ovarian sensitivity to FSH can facilitate a physician's decision-making in providing the optimal infertility therapy for PCOS patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding was provided by the University Hospital of Essen.

Impact of clomiphene citrate during ovarian stimulation on the luteal phase after GnRH agonist trigger.

The use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation in a GnRH antagonist protocol has been associated with poorer clinical outcomes due to an increased luteal-phase defect. It has been shown that LH activity is crucial in a normal luteal phase. Studies assessing the LH concentrations after clomiphene citrate co-treatment have observed increased luteal-phase LH concentrations. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to analyse the effect of clomiphene citrate on the endocrine profile in the luteal phase when using GnRH agonist trigger. This was evaluated in eight oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation using clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant FSH compared with a control group of five donors treated with recombinant FSH only. The endocrine profile was comparable in both groups, except for serum LH concentrations on the day after trigger (121.3±53.0IU/l versus 52.9±21.5IU/l, respectively, P=0.022). No significant differences in LH concentrations were found on the day of trigger or 5days after oocyte retrieval. In conclusion, a luteal-phase defect was observed despite treatment with clomiphene citrate during ovarian stimulation. The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger ovulation in IVF has been associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes due to an increased luteal-phase defect. The luteal phase is the last phase of the menstrual cycle and is defined as the period between ovulation and the beginning of pregnancy or menses. It has been shown the activity of LH is crucial in a normal luteal phase. Studies assessing the LH concentrations after clomiphene citrate, an oestrogen receptor inhibitor, co-treatment have observed increased luteal-phase LH concentrations. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to analyse the effect of clomiphene citrate on menstrual cycle day 2-6 on the hormone profile in the luteal phase when using GnRH agonist trigger. This was evaluated was in eight oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation using recombinant FSH compared with a control cohort of donors treated with recombinant FSH only. The current prospective cohort study reports higher LH concentrations on the day after GnRH agonist trigger, but not 5days after oocyte retrieval (i.e. in the luteal phase). In conclusion, a luteal-phase defect was observed despite the administration of clomiphene citrate during ovarian stimulation. Additional treatment with clomiphene citrate in the follicular phase is therefore not a valid alternative to prevent luteal-phase defect after GnRH agonist trigger.

Short follicular phase of stimulation following corifollitropin alfa or daily recombinant FSH treatment does not compromise clinical outcome: a retrospective analysis of the Engage trial.

To evaluate whether a short follicular phase of ovarian stimulation compromises the chance of pregnancy, subjects from a double-blind, randomized trial treated with a single dose of corifollitropin alfa (n=756) or daily recombinant FSH (n=750) were categorized as early responders if three follicles ≥17 mm were reached and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was administered prior to or on stimulation day 8, and as normal responders if three follicles ≥17 mm were reached and HCG was administered after stimulation day 8. In the corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH groups, 23.2% and 29.1%, respectively, were early responders (P=0.01). Regardless of the treatment group, the initial ovarian response was higher in early responders, but with two extra days of stimulation, the number and size of follicles on the day of HCG in the normal responders was similar to those of the early responders. The number of oocytes was similar in both response groups following corifollitropin alfa treatment (13.6 versus 14.5) and recombinant FSH treatment (12.8, both groups). The ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable for early and normal responders regardless of the treatment group, supporting successful outcome following a stimulation period of only 1 week.