Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020. RESULTS: A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.

Management and outcomes of adolescent and young adult sarcoma patients: results from the French nationwide database NETSARC.

BACKGROUND: The initial management of patients with sarcoma is a critical issue. We used the nationwide French National Cancer Institute-funded prospective sarcoma database NETSARC to report the management and oncologic outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) patients with sarcoma at the national level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC database gathers regularly monitored and updated data from patients with sarcoma. NETSARC was queried for patients (15-30 years) with sarcoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 for whom tumor resection had been performed. We reported management, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in AYA treated in French reference sarcoma centers (RSC) and outside RSC (non-RSC) and conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 3,227 patients aged 15-30 years with sarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the study included 2,227 patients with surgery data available, among whom 1,290 AYAs had been operated in RSC, and 937 AYAs in non-RSC. Significant differences in compliance to guidelines were observed including pre-treatment biopsy (RSC: 85.9%; non-RSC 48.1%), pre-treatment imaging (RSC: 86.8%; non-RSC: 56.5%) and R0 margins (RSC 57.6%; non-RSC: 20.2%) (p < 0.001). 3y-OS rates were 81.1% (95%CI 78.3-83.6) in AYA in RSC and 82.7% (95%CI 79.4-85.5) in AYA in non-RSC, respectively. Whereas no significant differences in OS was observed in AYAs treated in RSC and in non-RSC, LRFS and PFS were improved in AYAs treated in RSC compared to AYAs treated in non-RSC (Hazard Ratios (HR): 0.58 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance for AYA patients with sarcoma to be managed in national sarcoma reference centers involving multidisciplinary medical teams with paediatric and adult oncologists.

Keeping the balance, the true major goal in advanced sarcoma.

Achieving a balance between long-term efficacy and good quality of life (QoL) is the main goal of treatment for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, some of whom experience prolonged survival without progression. An awareness of the challenges particular to this complex set of diseases can help preserve patient QoL during treatment. Histology is among the main factors to consider when selecting treatment in advanced disease. Close attention to the toxicity profiles of available regimens is of particular importance, especially in more advanced lines where the population is usually more vulnerable. Surgical outcomes are significantly better in patients managed with expert care, and early referral to sarcoma reference centers is key to improving survival and QoL.

Relevance of Reference Centers in Sarcoma Care and Quality Item Evaluation: Results from the Prospective Registry of the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcoma (GEIS).

BACKGROUND: Reference centers (RCs) are a key point for improving the survival of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). The aim of this study was to evaluate selected items in the management of patients with STS, comparing results between RC and local hospitals (LHs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diagnostic and therapeutic data from patients diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2011 were collected. Correlation with outcome was performed. RESULTS: A total of 622 sarcomas were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 40 months. Imaging of primary tumor preoperatively (yes vs. no) correlated with a higher probability of free surgical margins (77.4% versus 53.7%; p = .006). The provenance of the biopsy (RC vs. LH) significantly affected relapse-free survival (RFS; 3-year RFS 66% vs. 46%, respectively; p = .019). Likewise, 3-year RFS was significantly worse in cases with infiltrated (55.6%) or unknown (43.4%) microscopic surgical margins compared with free margins (63.6%; p < .001). Patients managed by RCs had a better 3-year overall survival compared with those managed by LHs (82% vs. 70.4%, respectively; p = .003). Perioperative chemotherapy in high-risk STS, more frequently administered in RCs than in LHs, resulted in significantly better 3-year RFS (66% vs. 44%; p = .011). In addition, patients with stage IV disease treated in RCs survived significantly longer compared with those in LHs (30.4 months vs. 18.5 months; p = .036). CONCLUSION: Our series indicate that selected quality-of-care items were accomplished better by RCs over LHs, all with significant prognostic value in patients with STS. Early referral to an RC should be mandatory if the aim is to improve the survival of patients with STS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This prospective study in patients diagnosed with soft-tissue sarcoma shows the prognostic impact of reference centers in the management of these patients. The magnitude of this impact encompasses all steps of the process, from the initial management (performing diagnostic biopsy) to the advanced disease setting. This is the first prospective evidence showing improvement in outcomes of patients with metastatic disease when they are managed in centers with expertise. This study provides extra data supporting referral of patients with sarcoma to reference centers.

Presentation and outcome of frequent and rare sarcoma histologic subtypes: A study of 10,262 patients with localized visceral/soft tissue sarcoma managed in reference centers.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe characteristics at diagnosis and outcomes of adults with soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 12,262 patients who were treated between January 1980 and 31 December 2013 in French Sarcoma Group centers and enrolled in the "Conticabase." Diagnoses were systematically reviewed by expert pathologists, and entities were classified according to the 2013 World Health Organization classification. Diagnostic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are described for the entire cohort, for the subgroup of patients with translocation-related sarcomas, and for 9 different histologic subtypes. RESULTS: The results stressed the magnitude of heterogeneity among adult sarcomas. For example, compared with other sarcomas, translocation-related sarcomas (2143 tumors; 20.8%) were associated with a younger age at presentation (40.6 vs 60.0 years; P < .0001), a low rate of predisposing conditions (0.01% vs 22.3%; P < .0001), a higher rate of lymph node involvement (4.7% vs 1.3%; P < .0001), and a higher rate of synchronous metastasis (11.9% vs 6.7%; P < .001); and complete (R0) resection (41.6% vs 31.9%; P < .0001), receipt of (neo)adjuvant radiation therapy (62.6% vs 42.2%; P < .0001), and receipt of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (36.6% vs 22.3%; P < .0001) were significantly more frequent. Overall, translocation-related sarcomas were associated with a lower rate of local relapse (18.1% vs 26.0%; P < .0001) but a higher rate of metastatic relapse (42.0% vs 30.7%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative efforts are urgently needed to better assess the natural history and management options for every histologic subtype of sarcoma. Cancer 2018;124:1179-87. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Advances in the Care of Primary Immunodeficiencies (PIDs): from Birth to Adulthood.

Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are a widely heterogeneous group of inherited defects of the immune system consisting of many clinical phenotypes with at least 300 underlying genetic deficits currently known. Patients with PIDs can present with, or develop during the course of their life, a susceptibility to recurrent and chronic infection along with autoimmune, allergic, inflammatory, and/or proliferative disorders, all potentially leading to end-organ damage. In recent years, a combination of basic and clinical research has greatly improved understanding of the underlying immunological and genetic defects in PIDs, leading to improved diagnosis, classification, and treatment approaches. In this review, we consider some of the key understandings that should direct diagnostic and treatment approaches in PID and offer insights into current and emerging management approaches and the lifelong care of patients from childhood through to adulthood.

Networking for ovarian rare tumors: a significant breakthrough improving disease management.

BACKGROUND: Rare ovarian tumors represent >20% of all ovarian cancers. Given the rarity of these tumors, natural history, prognostic factors are not clearly identified. The extreme variability of patients (age, histological subtypes, stage) induces multiple and complex therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Since 2011, a national network with a dedicated system for referral, up to 22 regional and three national reference centers (RC) has been supported by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). The network aims to prospectively monitor the management of rare ovarian tumors and provide an equal access to medical expertise and innovative treatments to all French patients through a dedicated website, www.ovaire-rare.org. RESULTS: Over a 5-year activity, 4612 patients have been included. Patients' inclusions increased from 553 in 2011 to 1202 in 2015. Expert pathology review and patients' files discussion in dedicated multidisciplinary tumor boards increased from 166 cases in 2011 (25%) to 538 (45%) in 2015. Pathology review consistently modified the medical strategy in 5-9% every year. The rate of patients' files discussed in RC similarly increased from 294 (53%) to 789 (66%). An increasing number (357 in 5 years) of gynecologic (non-ovarian) rare tumors were also registered by physicians seeking for pathological or medical advice from expert tumor boards. CONCLUSION: Such a nation-wide organization for rare gynecological tumors has invaluable benefits, not only for patients, but also for epidemiological, clinical and biological research.

Advances and controversies in the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Intensive clinical research in the sarcoma field has provided insight into the histopathological diversity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and led to the introduction of many new agents that promise to play an important role in the management of patients with STS. While an increasing body of scientific data has advanced our knowledge of this complex family of mesenchymal diseases, several controversies remain to be resolved: Is doxorubicin-based therapy still the definitive standard first-line treatment for all patients with unresectable and/or metastatic STS of all subtypes? Is histology-driven therapy beyond gastrointestinal stromal tumors a reality or are we pursuing an unachievable objective? Are we making practical headway in the establishment of sarcoma reference centers? Is it clearly established which is the best parameter to evaluate the efficacy of a new agent in STS?

Intensity of recent years in the investigation of soft tissue sarcoma.

The European Medicines Agency's approval in 2007 of trabectedin for treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) - the first new agent approved in this indication for more than 30 years - coincided with the start of an exciting era in sarcoma research. Over the past 10 years, several other cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies have been approved for use in advanced STS and research efforts continue to intensify. In parallel, the virtual explosion of new evidence has presented its own set of challenges in terms of interpreting the data and understanding how it may apply to individual patients. This review provides a critical appraisal of several key studies published in the field of advanced STS in the past decade.

[Does the healthcare for rare diseases benefit from the legislative reforms?] / Profitiert die Versorgung von seltenen Erkrankungen von den Krankenhausreformen?

BACKGROUND: The founding of the National Action League for People with Rare Diseases (NAMSE) in 2010 represents the creation of a significant political platform. In addition, recent years had seen Germany and the EU adopt specific legislative measures aimed at improving healthcare for people with rare diseases. OBJECTIVE: In this article we will give an overview of the legislative reforms adopted between 2013 and 2016 and evaluate how the specific healthcare situation of people with rare diseases has been improved. MATERIALS AND METHODS USED: This article analyzes the health care legislative reforms adopted during the 18th term (since 2013) of the German lower house, the Bundestag, as well as their self-governing implementation. The analysis also extends to similar political initiatives of the European Commission. RESULTS: The impact of the recent hospital reforms on the health care received by patients or on the work of health care providers in the field of rare diseases cannot be assessed conclusively at this point (January 2017). One positive feature is that the health care coverage mandate of the university hospital outpatient departments now also comprises rare diseases. DISCUSSION: Recent legislative measures have created possibilities to improve the economic position of centers for rare diseases and university hospital outpatient departments. What these improvements will look like specifically depends on the implementation within the hospital plans of the federal states as well as on the outcome of the remuneration negotiations between university hospitals and health insurance funds.

Public health microbiology in Germany: 20 years of national reference centers and consultant laboratories.

In 1995, in agreement with the German Federal Ministry of Health, the Robert Koch Institute established a public health microbiology system consisting of national reference centers (NRCs) and consultant laboratories (CLs). The goal was to improve the efficiency of infection protection by advising the authorities on possible measures and to supplement infectious disease surveillance by monitoring selected pathogens that have high public health relevance. Currently, there are 19 NRCs and 40 CLs, each appointed for three years. In 2009, an additional system of national networks of NRCs and CLs was set up in order to enhance effectiveness and cooperation within the national reference laboratory system. The aim of these networks was to advance exchange in diagnostic methods and prevention concepts among reference laboratories and to develop geographic coverage of services. In the last two decades, the German public health laboratory reference system coped with all major infectious disease challenges. The European Union and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) are considering implementing a European public health microbiology reference laboratory system. The German reference laboratory system should be well prepared to participate actively in this upcoming endeavor.

Long term survival in adult osteosarcoma patients treated with a two-drug regimen: Final results of the OSAD93 phase II study of the FSG-GETO.

RATIONALE: We report a phase II trial (OSAD93) testing CDDP with ifosfamide (IFO), without doxorubicin in neoadjuvant phase, in adult osteosarcoma with a 25 years follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicentric phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with IFO and CDDP in localized high-grade osteosarcoma of patients. Patients received 4 pre-operative courses of IFO 9 g/m2 and CDDP 100 mg/m2 on day 4 (SHOC regimen), followed by local treatment. Doxorubicin was added post-operatively (HOCA regimen) in patients with > 10 % residual tumor cells. A Good Histological Response (GHR), ie ≤ 10 % residual tumor cells in > 30 % of patients, was the primary objective. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary objectives. RESULTS: From Jan 1994 to Jun 1998, 60 patients were included. Median age was 27 (range: 16-63). Primary tumor sites were limbs (76 %), trunk, head or neck (24 %). After neoadjuvant SHOC, grade 3-4 and febrile neutropenia, thrombopenia, and re-hospitalization occurred in 58 %, 17 %, 17 % and 22 % of SHOC courses and in 76 %, 28 %, 47 %, 47 % of HOCA courses, respectively. GHR was obtained in 16/60 (27.5 %) patients. With a median follow-up of 322 months, the DFS and OS were 51.8 % and 64.4 % at 5 years. At 10 years, DFS and OS were 49.9 % and 64.4 %. At 25 years, DFS and OS were 47.8 % and 55.9 %. No long-term cardiac toxicity was observed. Three patients developed a second malignancy (one fatal) after 300 months. CONCLUSION: Though the primary endpoint of OSAD93 was not met, this pre-operative doxorubicin-free regimen led to excellent long-term survival with limited toxicity in localized osteosarcoma.

Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) versus Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS): Presentation and outcome in the nationwide NETSARC+ series of 330 patients over 13 years.

Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) and Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS) are ultrarare sarcomas sharing common translocations whose natural history are not well known. We report on the nationwide exhaustive series of 330 patients with SEF or LGFMS in NETSARC+ since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Since 2010, (i) pathological review has been mandatory for sarcoma,and (ii) tumour/patients' characteristics have been collected in the NETSARC+ nationwide database. The characteristics of patients with SEF and LGFMS and their outcome are compared. RESULTS: 35/73 (48%) and 125/257(49%) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were female. More visceral, bone and trunk primary sites were observed in SEF (p < 0.001). 30% of SEF vs 4% of LGFMS patients had metastasis at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Median size of the primary tumor was 51 mm (range 10-90) for LGFMS vs 80 (20-320) for SEF (p < 0.001). Median age for LGFMS patients was 12 years younger than that of SEF patients (43 [range 4-98] vs 55 [range 10-91], p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often given to SEF (16% vs 9%, p = 0.05). More patients with LGFMS were operated first in reference centers (51% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The R0 rate on the operative specimen was 41% in LGFMS vs 16% in SEF (p < 0.001). Median event-free survival (EFS) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were 32 vs 136 months (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Fifty-months OS was 93% vs 81% for LGFMS vs SEF (p = 0.05). Median OS was 77 months after first relapse, similar for SEF and LGFMS. In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS in LGFMS. CONCLUSIONS: Although sharing close molecular alterations, SEF and LGFMS have a different natural history, clinical presentation and outcome, with a higher risk of metastatic relapse in SEF. Survival after relapse is longer than with other sarcomas, and similar for SEF and LGFMS.

Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma by the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS).

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and biologically heterogeneous group of tumors arising from mesenchymal cells. The incidence is estimated at five cases per 100,000 people per year. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for 10-15% of all STS, and their management depends on their anatomical characteristics and histotype. Due to their very low incidence, it is recommended that RPS be treated in reference centers and evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT). In Spain, the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) brings together experts from various specialties to promote research on sarcomas and improve treatment results. This paper summarizes the GEIS recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with RPS.

[Second opinions and reference pathology]. / Zweitmeinungs- und Referenzpathologie.

Second opinions in pathology require expert knowledge for diagnosis in difficult cases and in Germany have a tradition that has grown into a network between primarily diagnostic care institutions and university-associated institutes of pathology that are active in research. The term reference pathology is not a designation for a class of institutes for pathology but rather indicates a function within prospective clinical trials with defined endpoints and a central pathology, which derives expert knowledge from this function. The thus generated collection of samples and expertise enable diagnostic support in difficult cases. Furthermore, research based on this tissue material might lead to the establishment of novel biomarkers and methods, which when transferred back for local application will enhance the overall diagnostic validity of pathological tissue analysis. Thus, for all institutes participating in the network second opinion and reference pathology provide considerable benefit.

[Centers for rare diseases-Structures, tasks and networks]. / Zentren für Seltene Erkrankungen ­ Strukturen, Aufgaben und Netzwerke.

People suffering from rare diseases are optimally treated in specialized centers with an interdisciplinary and multiprofessional team. These centers are also actively involved in research and provide all levels of teaching and education with respect to a single disease or a group of diseases. In Germany, there are now more than 30 reference or so-called type A centers for rare diseases located at university hospitals, which undertake these tasks with their associated disease (group)-specific type B or specialist centers. The centers collaborate in various national and international networks and work in close contact with patient organizations. The current challenges for the centers include the long-term sustainable financing and the construction of a telemedical infrastructure for networking.

Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS).

INTRODUCTION: Penile cancer (PeCa) is an orphan disease in European countries. The current guidelines are predominantly based on retrospective studies with a low level of evidence. In our study, we aimed to identify predictors for guideline-conform treatment and hypothesize that reference centers for PeCa and physicians' experience promote guideline compliance and therefore correct local tumor therapy. METHODS: This study is part of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS), an international collaboration group evaluating therapeutic management for PeCa in Central Europe. For this module, a 14-item-survey was developed and sent to 681 urologists in 45 European centers. Three questions focused on therapeutic decisions for PeCa in clinical stage Tis, Ta-T1a, and T1b. Four questions addressed potential personal confounders. Survey results were analyzed by bootstrap-adjusted stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis to identify predictors for EAU guideline-conform local treatment of PeCa. RESULTS: For local therapy of cTis 80.4% recommended guideline-conform treatment, for cTa-cT1a 87.3% and for cT1b 59.1%. In total, 42.4% chose a correct approach in all tumor stages. The number of PeCa patients treated at the hospital, a higher level of training of the physicians, resource-based answering and the option of penile-sparing surgery offered at the hospital matched with giving guideline-conform recommendations and thus accurate local tumor treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with PeCa are best treated by experienced physicians, in centers with a high number of cases, which also offer a wide range of local tumor therapy. This could be offered in reference centers.

[Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma]. / Hémangioendothéliome épithélioïde.

We describe herein the inaugural manifestations, the radiological and histological diagnosis criteria for and the outcome of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE). Most of EHE (90%) display a specific reciprocal chromosomic translocation t(1;3)(p36;q23-25), which is associated with the synthesis of fusion protein WWTR1/CAMTA1. EHE are low-grade vascular sarcomas. EHE could be initially localized or multifocal. At localized stage, EHE are best treated with focal treatments. At multifocal stage, the upfront strategy is watchful follow-up. Some multifocal EHE display very indolent course with spontaneous stable disease for years or decades. In case of progressive multifocal EHE, there is no consensual treatment. Diagnostic and clinical management of EHE requires interdisciplinary expertise from labeled centers.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes of minimally invasive fetal surgeries: experience from two reference centers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding high open surgery-related maternal morbidity have led to improvements in minimally invasive fetal surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the perinatal and maternal outcomes of minimally invasive fetal surgery performed in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary reference centers. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted using medical records from 2011 to 2019. The outcomes included maternal and pregnancy complications, neonatal morbidity, and mortality from the intrauterine period to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Fifty mothers and 70 fetuses were included in this study. The pathologies included twin-twin transfusion syndrome, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, myelomeningocele, lower urinary tract obstruction, pleural effusion, congenital upper airway obstruction syndrome, and amniotic band syndrome. Regarding maternal complications, 8% had anesthetic complications, 12% had infectious complications, and 6% required blood transfusions. The mean gestational age at surgery was 25 weeks, the mean gestational age at delivery was 33 weeks, 83% of fetuses undergoing surgery were born alive, and 69% were discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size, we demonstrated that minimally invasive fetal surgeries are safe for pregnant women. Perinatal mortality and prematurity rates in this study were comparable to those previously. Prematurity remains the most significant problem associated with fetal surgery.