Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.

BACKGROUND: The two major reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs are the Grammont design and the lateralized design. Even if the lateralized design is biomechanically favored, the classic Grammont prosthesis continues to be used. Functional and subjective patient scores as well as implant survival described in the literature so far are comparable to the lateralized design. A pure comparison of how the RSA design influences outcome in patients has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was a comparison focused on patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). METHODS: We analyzed registry data from 696 CTA patients prospectively collected between 2012 and 2020 in two specialized orthopedic centers up to 2 years post-RSA with the same follow-up time points (6,12 24 months). Complete teres minor tears were excluded. Three groups were defined: group 1 (inlay, 155° humeral inclination, 36 + 2 mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 50)), group 2 (inlay, 135° humeral inclination, 36 + 4 mm lateralized glenosphere (n = 141)) and group 3 (onlay, 145° humeral inclination, + 3 mm lateralized base plate, 36 + 2 mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 35)) We compared group differences in clinical outcomes (e.g., active and passive range of motion (ROM), abduction strength, Constant-Murley score (CS)), radiographic evaluations of prosthetic position, scapular anatomy and complications using mixed models adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: The final analysis included 226 patients. The overall adjusted p-value of the CS for all time-points showed no significant difference (p = 0.466). Flexion of group 3 (mean, 155° (SD 13)) was higher than flexion of group 1 (mean, 142° (SD 18) and 2 (mean, 132° (SD 18) (p < 0.001). Values for abduction of group 3 (mean, 145° (SD 23)) were bigger than those of group 1 (mean, 130° (SD 22)) and group 2 (mean, 118° (SD 25)) (p < 0.001). Mean external rotation for group 3 (mean, 41° (SD 23)) and group 2 (mean, 38° (SD 17)) was larger than external rotation of group 1 (mean, 24° (SD 16)) (p < 0.001); a greater proportion of group 2 (78%) and 3 (69%) patients reached L3 level on internal rotation compared to group 1 (44%) (p = 0.003). Prosthesis position measurements were similar, but group 3 had significantly less scapular notching (14%) versus 24% (group 2) and 50% (group 1) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome scores of different RSA designs for CTA revealed comparable results. However, CTA patients with a lateralized and distalized RSA configuration were associated with achieving better flexion and abduction with less scapular notching. A better rotation was associated with either of the lateralized RSA designs in comparison with the classic Grammont prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has increased at a greater rate than other shoulder procedures. In general, clinical and functional outcomes after RTSA have been favorable regardless of indication. However, little evidence exists regarding patient specific factors associated with clinical improvement after RTSA. Predicting postoperative outcomes after RTSA may support patients and physicians to establish more accurate patient expectations and contribute in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA for patients with degenerative shoulder disorders. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro were searched to identify cohort studies reporting on predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA. Authors independently screened publications on eligibility. Risk of bias for each publication was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A qualitative description of the results was given. The GRADE framework was used to establish the quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 1986 references were found of which 11 relevant articles were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed as low (N = 7, 63.6%) or moderate (N = 4, 36.4%). According to the evidence synthesis there was moderate-quality evidence indicating that greater height predicts better postoperative shoulder function, and greater preoperative range of motion (ROM) predicts increased postoperative ROM following. CONCLUSION: Preoperative predictive factors that may predict postoperative outcomes are: patient height and preoperative range of motion. These factors should be considered in the preoperative decision making for a RTSA, and can potentially be used to aid in preoperative decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; Systematic review.

Outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty secondary to rotator cuff arthropathy in a low-income population.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a valuable treatment for rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) in developed regions. Socioeconomic issues impact access to specialized care and there is a lack of data on RSA outcomes in developing regions. We present our 24-month follow-up on RSA surgeries to treat RCA in our low-income population. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 26 patients subjected to RSA at Hospital Geral de Fortaleza-CE, Brazil, between January 2018 and December 2020. Literacy [>/≤ 8 school years(SY)] and income were documented. Outcomes considered pain (visual analogue scale; VAS) as well as SSV, SPADI, ASES, and UCLA scoring, and range of motion [forward flexion (FF); external rotation (ER)]. RESULTS: Patients were 68.5 ± 7.6 years-old with 16(61.5%) females; 65% had hypertension and 7 (26.9%) had diabetes. Over 90% declared < 900.00 US$ monthly family earnings and 10 (38.4%) patients declared ≤8 SY with > 80% exerting blue-collar jobs. Pain showed a significant reduction from baseline (8 ± 2) to 24 months (2.1 ± 2.3; p < 0.001). UCLA (10.3 ± 5.6 and 28.6 ± 7.2), ASES (16.7 ± 10.8 and 63.1 ± 28.4), SSV (326 ± 311 and 760 ± 234), and SPADI (98.3 ± 26.5) scores significantly improved from baseline to 24 months, achieving minimal clinically important difference. FF (89.2° ± 51.2° to 140.6 ± 38.3°) and ER (19.2° ± 22.5 to 33.4° ± 20.6°) significantly improved from baseline to 24 months (p = 0.004 and 0.027, respectively). There were 5 non-serious adverse events with one surgical revision. All patients returned to daily life activities. CONCLUSION: This is the first outcome report 2 years following RSA in a low-income population. Data indicate this procedure is justifiable regardless of socioeconomic issues.

The effect of cuff arthropathy stage on sleep disturbance and kinesiophobia in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to determine the changes in pre-and post-operative Pittsburg sleep quality index (PSQI) and Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK) values ​​according to the Hamada classification in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA). METHODS: One hundred and eight patients who underwent RSA for RCTA were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups with low grade (stages 1-2-3) (n = 49) and high grade (stages 4a-4b-5) (n = 59) according to the Hamada classification, which is the radiographic evaluation of RCTA. PSQI and TSK values ​​were calculated preoperatively, and post-operatively at the 6th week, 6th month, and 1st year. The change in PSQI and TSK values ​​between the evaluations and the effect of staging according to the Hamada classification on this change was examined. RESULTS: When compared in preoperative evaluations, PSQI and TSK scores were found to be lower in low-grade group 1 (7.39 ± 1.56, 51.88 ± 4.62, respectively) than in high-grade group 2 (10.47 ± 2.39, 57.05 ± 3.25, respectively) according to Hamada classification (both p < 0.001). In the postoperative evaluations, PSQI and TSK results decreased gradually compared to the preoperative evaluations, and there was a severe decrease in both parameters between the 6th-week and 6th-month evaluations (both p < 0.001). Preoperatively, 102 (95%) patients had sleep disturbance (PSQI ≥ 6), and 108 (100%) patients had high kinesiophobia (TSK > 37). In the 1st year follow-ups, sleep disturbance was observed in 5 (5%) patients and kinesiophobia in 1 (1%) patient. When the Hamada stages were compared, it was seen that there was a significant difference before the operation (both p < 0.001), but the statistically significant difference disappeared in the PSQI value in the 1st year (p = 0.092) and in the TSK value in the 6th month (p = 0.164) post-operatively. It was observed that Hamada staging caused significant differences in PSQI and TSK values ​​in the preoperative period but did not affect the clinical results after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: RSA performed based on RCTA improves sleep quality and reduces kinesiophobia. RCTA stage negatively affects PSQI and TSK before the operation but does not show any effect after the treatment.

Structural Bone Grafting with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis with Severe Glenoid Bone Loss: outcomes using a long post.

INTRODUCTION: Severe posterior glenoid bone loss with glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff can be managed with reverse shoulder arthroplasty but requires lateralization and version correction to avoid potential complications, such as instability, notching and implant failure. Angled bone grafting with humeral head autograft can provide durable glenoid bone stock, but results have been mixed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported and objective outcomes as well as complication and failure rates for patients who underwent angled humeral head autografting for severe retroversion. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary RSA with angled humeral head autograft and Stryker Tornier long central post baseplate for severe glenoid bone loss in the setting of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff at our institution between November 2018 and February of 2022 were identified. Individuals with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis and preoperative glenoid retroversion of ≥30° were included. Patients undergoing revision procedures, planned two-stage arthroplasty were excluded. Differences in pre- and postoperative range of motion, as well as patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and re-operation rates were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 24 shoulders in 23 patients (61% male), with a mean age of 65.6 years were included. Average preoperative retroversion was 37.4° (range: 30° - 51°). Mean follow-up was 2.9 years (range: 2 - 4.3 years). Significant improvements were found in flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Patient-reported subjective outcomes were excellent, with average ASES score of 93.6 and average SSV 93.8%. Sixteen (67%) shoulders received postoperative CT scans and all were found to have incorporated. Complications included one shoulder hematoma requiring incision and drainage without revision, and a post-traumatic fracture of the inferior glenoid screw at 11 months, requiring revision RSA with bone grafting. No atraumatic catastrophic failures occurred due to component loosening. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that using angled humeral head bone grafting is a good solution for version correction in extreme posterior glenoid bone loss. Significant improvements are reported in ROM, pain, and subjective functional scores, with excellent graft incorporation rates and a low complication profile at early follow-up. Further work should focus on gathering higher levels of evidence, detailed radiographic analyses and exploring humeral head bone grafting for other indications.

Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Long-term Survivorship, Complications, Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Inverted-bearing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (IB-RSA) is characterized by a polyethylene glenosphere and a metallic humeral liner to minimize PE wear and debris secondary to impingement between the humerus and glenoid neck. IB-RSA long-term survivorship, complication and revision rates, as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes have not been reported yet. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective study on a consecutive series of 151 patients who underwent primary IB-RSA from January 2009 to September 2015 and were evaluated clinically and radiologically at minimum 8 years follow-up. All complications and reoperations were recorded. Survivorship analysis with any revision surgery as endpoint was done using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (follow-up rate 51.7%) were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 10.1 ± 1.9 years. At 10 years the revision-free survival was 98.7% (95% CI: 94.8-99.7). Sixteen complications (10.6%) were observed: 2 axillary nerve injuries, 2 infections, 2 glenoid loosenings (which stabilized within one year), 2 cases of otherwise unexplained painful stiffness, 4 acromial fractures, 1 post-traumatic scapular pillar fracture and 3 post-traumatic humeral periprosthetic fractures. Two patients were revised due to infection. No cases of late glenoid loosening and humeral loosening were observed. The revision rate was 1.3%. All the clinical scores and range of motion significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with preoperative status: final Constant score was 66.1 ± 17.4, SSV 79.1 ± 20.9, ASES 82.2 ± 17.7. Scapular notching was observed in 51.4% of patients: only 1 case of grade 3 notching was observed in an early glenoid subsidence case. CONCLUSIONS: Primary IB-RSA appears to be a safe and effective procedure and does not present specific implant-associated complications at long-term follow-up. Radiographic analysis showed that inverting the biomaterials leads to a distinct kind of notching with mainly mechanical features.

Navigated augmented reality through a head-mounted display leads to low deviation between planned, intra- and post-operative parameters during glenoid component placement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept case series.

BACKGROUND: Navigated augmented reality (AR) through a head-mounted display (HMD) has led to accurate glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in an in-vitro setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point and depth of the glenoid component placement during RSA, assisted by navigated AR through a HMD, in a surgical setting. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive patients undergoing RSA in two institutions, between August 2021 and January 2023, were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, surgery assisted by AR through a HMD, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at six weeks. All participants agreed to participate in the study and an informed consent was provided in all cases. Preoperative CT scans were undertaken for all cases and used for three-dimensional (3D) planning. Intra-operatively, glenoid preparation and component placement were assisted by a navigated AR system through a HMD in all patients. Intraoperative parameters were recorded by the system. A postoperative CT scan was undertaken at 6 weeks, and 3D reconstruction was used for obtaining postoperative parameters. The deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, and depth of the glenoid component placement was calculated. Outliers were defined as >5° for inclination and retroversion and >5 mm for entry point. RESULTS: 17 patients (9 females, 12 right shoulders) with a mean age of 72.8±9.1 years old (range, 47.0 to 82.0) met inclusion criteria. The mean deviation between intra- and postoperative measurements was 1.5°±1.0° (range, 0.0° to 3.0°) for inclination, 2.8°±1.5° (range, 1.0° to 4.5°) for retroversion, 1.8±1.0 mm (range, 0.7mm to 3.0mm) for entry point, and 1.9±1.9 mm (range, 0.0mm to 4.5mm) for depth. The mean deviation between planned and postoperative values was 2.5°±3.2° (range, 0.0° to 11.0°) for inclination, 3.4°±4.6° (range, 0.0° to 18.0°) for retroversion, 2.0±2.5 mm (range, 0.0° to 9.7°) for entry point, and 1.3±1.6 mm (range, 1.3mm to 4.5mm) for depth. There were no outliers between intra- and postoperative values and there were three outliers between planned and postoperative values. The mean time (minutes:seconds) for the tracker unit placement and the scapula registration was 03:02 (range, 01:48 to 04:26) and 08:16 (range, 02:09 to 17:58), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of a navigated AR system through a HMD in RSA led to low deviations between planned, intra-operative and postoperative parameters for glenoid component placement.

Conjoint tendon lengthening improves internal rotation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common procedure for treating a variety of shoulder pathologies. However, many patients struggle with postoperative internal rotation (IR) deficits, which often hinder their activities of daily living. The conjoint tendon provides an anatomic barrier that can impede the postoperative IR of the shoulder, and this study aims to evaluate the effect of a conjoint tendon lengthening on the glenohumeral range of motion (ROM) following RSA. METHODS: This study used ten fresh-frozen cadaver specimens of the upper extremity. An RSA was implanted using a standard deltopectoral approach, and the ROM was assessed postimplantation. Following this, the conjoint tendon was identified and lengthened using a tendon sheath z-plasty, and the ROM was rerecorded. Statistical significance for the ROM gains after conjoint tendon lengthening was determined with a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: Following the lengthening of the conjoint tendon, there were statistically significant improvements in all ROMs (P < .05). Subjects demonstrated a notable gain in IR to the back by 10.3 cm (P < .01), and all ROMs increased by at least 10°, except for forward flexion, which increased by 6° (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that lengthening the conjoint tendon improves postoperative ROM of the glenohumeral joint after RSA, offering a potential solution to considerable IR deficits that are commonly encountered post-RSA. Subsequent clinical and biomechanical studies should assess the stability of the shoulder joint following conjoint tendon lengthening.

Operative Treatment of Acromial and Scapular Spine Fracture Nonunions Complicating Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the acromion and spine can have a major impact on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with respect to pain, motion, and function. Reports on internal fixation for these fractures are isolated to small series or case reports with variable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acromion or spine fractures encountered before or after RSA and describe our evolution of fixation techniques. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2023, 22 fractures or nonunions of the acromion or spine of the scapula underwent ORIF at a single institution and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. In 16 shoulders, fractures occurred after RSA, whereas 5 shoulders underwent ORIF prior to RSA. One shoulder had undergone prior failed ORIF elsewhere and revision ORIF was performed at our institution. There were 10 males and 12 females with a mean age of 67 (SD=15.1) years. Fixation strategies included single (n=11) and double plate fixation (n=11). Kruskal-Wallis one-way analyses of variance were used to analyze continuous variables and Chi-square tests employed for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 5 fractures treated with ORIF pre-RSA, 1 shoulder suffered an additional fracture medial to the hardware and 1 required additional bone grafting for incomplete union at the time of RSA. These 5 shoulders all underwent RSA uneventfully, but one fracture experienced late displacement of the scapular spine nonunion, leading to plate removal. Of the 16 post-RSA ORIF shoulders, radiographic union was confirmed in 14 and substantial residual inferior angulation identified in 3. New fractures occurred after ORIF in 5 shoulders. For patients who underwent ORIF after RSA, pain scores improved from a mean of 8 to 1.9 points, with more modest elevation gains (58.2° to 91.3° pre- and postoperatively, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of acromion and scapular spine fractures or nonunions in the setting of RSA have the potential to lead to union. When these fractures and nonunions are encountered prior to RSA, ORIF allows for uneventful RSA implantation, but secondary displacement may occur. ORIF seems to lead to improvements in pain, but more modest improvements in motion and function. Our fixation strategy has evolved to (1) dual plating, (2) spanning the whole length of the spine with one of the plates, (3) use of hook features under the acromion or os trigonum if possible, and (4) liberal use of bone graft.

Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We aim to predict a clinical difference in the postoperative range of motion (RoM) between 2 reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) stem designs (Inlay-155° and Onlay-145°) using preoperative planning software. We hypothesized that preoperative 3D planning could anticipate the differences in postoperative clinical RoM between 2 humeral stem designs and by keeping the same glenoid implant. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (14 men and 23 women, 76 ± 7 years) underwent a BIO-RSA (bony increased offset-RSA) with the use of preoperative planning and an intraoperative 3-dimensional-printed patient-specific guide for glenoid component implantation between January 2014 and September 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Two types of humeral implants were used: Inlay with a 155° inclination (Inlay-155°) and Onlay with a 145°inclination (Onlay-145°). Glenoid implants remained unchanged. The postoperative RSA angle (inclination of the area in which the glenoid component of the RSA is implanted) and the lateralization shoulder angle were measured to confirm the good positioning of the glenoid implant and the global lateralization on postoperative X-rays. A correlation between simulated and clinical RoM was studied. Simulated and last follow-up active forward flexion (AFE), abduction, and external rotation (ER) were compared between the 2 types of implants. RESULTS: No significant difference in RSA and lateralization shoulder angle was found between planned and postoperative radiological implants' position. Clinical RoM at the last follow-up was always significantly different from simulated preoperative RoM. A low-to-moderate but significant correlation existed for AFE, abduction, and ER (r = 0.45, r = 0.47, and r = 0.57, respectively; P < .01). AFE and abduction were systematically underestimated (126° ± 16° and 95° ± 13° simulated vs. 150° ± 24° and 114° ± 13° postoperatively; P < .001), whereas ER was systematically overestimated (50° ± 19° simulated vs. 36° ± 19° postoperatively; P < .001). Simulated abduction and ER highlighted a significant difference between Inlay-155° and Onlay-145° (12° ± 2°, P = .01, and 23° ± 3°, P < .001), and this was also retrieved clinically at the last follow-up (23° ± 2°, P = .02, and 22° ± 2°, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate the clinical relevance of predicted RoM for RSA preoperative planning. Motion that involves the scapulothoracic joint (AFE and abduction) is underestimated, while ER is overestimated. However, preoperative planning provides clinically relevant RoM prediction with a significant correlation between both and brings reliable data when comparing 2 different types of humeral implants (Inlay-155° and Onlay-145°) for abduction and ER. Thus, RoM simulation is a valuable tool to optimize implant selection and choose RSA implants to reach the optimal RoM.

Funding bias in shoulder arthroplasty research.

BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown that industry funding can impact the outcomes reported in medical literature. Limited data exist on the degree of bias that industry funding may have on shoulder arthroplasty literature outside of the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. The purpose of this study is to characterize the type and frequency of funding for recently published shoulder arthroplasty studies and the impact of industry funding on reported outcomes. We hypothesized that studies with industry funding are more likely to report positive outcomes than those without. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study searching all articles with the term "shoulder arthroplasty," "reverse shoulder arthroplasty," "anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty," or "total shoulder arthroplasty" on PubMed from the years January 2020 to December 2022. The primary outcome of studies was coded as either positive, negative, or neutral. A positive result was defined as one in which the null hypothesis was rejected. A negative result was defined as one in which the result did not favor the group in which the industry-funded implant was used. A neutral result was defined as one in which the null hypothesis was confirmed. Article funding type, subcategorized as National Institutes of Health funding or industry funding was recorded. Author disclosures were recorded to determine conflicts of interest. Statistical analysis was conducted using the χ2 test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 750 articles reported on either conflict of interest or funding source and were included in the study. Of the total number of industry-funded studies, the majority were found to have a positive primary endpoint (58.1%, 104 of 179), as compared to a negative (7.8%, 14 of 179) or neutral endpoint (33.5%, 60 of 179) (P = .004). Overall, 363 articles reported an author conflict of interest, and the majority of these studies had positive primary endpoint (55.6%, 202 of 363) as compared to negative (9.1%, 33 of 363) or neutral endpoints (34.4%, 125 of 363) (P = .002). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that there is a significant relationship between conflicts of interest and the primary outcome of shoulder arthroplasty studies, beyond the overall positive publication bias. Studies with industry funding and author conflicts of interest both report positive outcomes more frequently than negative outcomes. Shoulder surgeons should be aware of this potential bias when choosing to base clinical practice on published data.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis with restricted preoperative forward elevation demonstrates similar outcomes but faster range of motion recovery compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been increasingly utilized for a variety of shoulder pathologies that are difficult to treat with anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Few studies have compared the outcomes of TSA vs. RSA in patients with cuff intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis and poor preoperative forward elevation. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in functional outcomes and postoperative range of motion (ROM) between TSA and RSA in these patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 116 patients who underwent RSA or TSA between 2013 and 2022 for the treatment of rotator cuff intact primary osteoarthritis with restricted preoperative forward flexion (FF) and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Each arthroplasty group was divided into 2 subgroups: patients with preoperative FF between 91° and 120° or FF lower than or equal to 90°. Patients' clinical outcomes, including active ROM, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale for pain, and subjective shoulder value were collected. Clinical and radiographic complications were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between RSA and TSA in terms of sex (58.3% male vs. 62.2% male, P = .692), or follow-up duration (20.1 months vs. 17.7 months, P = .230). However, the RSA cohort was significantly older (72.0 ± 8.2 vs. 65.4 ± 10.6, P = .012) and weaker in FF and (ER) before surgery (P < .001). There was no difference between RSA (57 patients) and TSA (59 patients) in visual analog scale pain score (1.2 ± 2.3 vs. 1.3 ± 2.3, P = .925), subjective shoulder value score (90 ± 15 vs. 90 ± 15, P = .859), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (78.4 ± 20.5 vs. 82.1 ± 23.2, P = .476). Postoperative active ROM was statistically similar between RSA and TSA cohorts in FF (145 ± 26 vs. 146 ± 23, P = .728) and ER (39 ± 15 vs. 41 ± 15, P = .584). However, internal rotation was lower in the RSA cohort (P < .001). This was also true in each subgroup. RSA led to faster postoperative FF and ER achievement at 3 months (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who have a structurally intact rotator cuff but limited preoperative forward elevation can achieve predictable clinical improvement in pain, ROM, and function after either TSA or RSA. Reverse arthroplasty may be a reliable treatment option in patients at risk for developing rotator cuff failure.

Comparison of 3D Computer Assisted Planning With and Without Patient Specific Instrumentation for Severe Bone Defects in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning is an integral aspect of managing complex deformity in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study was to compare the success of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) and 3D computer-assisted planning with standard instrumentation (Non-PSI) in achieving planned corrections of the glenoid among patients undergoing RSA with severe bony deformity requiring glenoid bone grafts. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed, including all patients that underwent RSA with combined bone grafting procedures (BIO-RSA or structural bone grafting) for severe glenoid deformity by a single between June 2016 and July 2023. Patients were required to have preoperative and postoperative CT scans as well as preoperative 3D planning performed for inclusion. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of 3D computer-assisted planning with or without PSI (PSI vs. Non-PSI). The corrected inclination and version were measured by two separate reviewers on preoperative and postoperative 2D CT scans and compared to their corresponding preoperative planning goals utilizing bivariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 45 patients that met our inclusion criteria (22 PSI and 23 Non-PSI). Preoperative inclination (mean ± SD) (PSI 10.12° ± 15.86°, Non-PSI 9.43° ± 10.64°; P = 0.864) and version (PSI -18.78° ± 18.3°, Non-PSI -17.82° ± 11.49°; P = 0.835) measurements were similar between groups. No significant differences in the mean deviation (error) between the postoperative and planned inclination (PSI 5.49° ± 3.72; Non-PSI 6.91° ± 5.05; P = 0.437) and version (PSI 8.37° ± 5.7; Non-PSI 5.37° ± 4.43; P = 0.054) were found between groups. No difference in the rate of outliers (>10° error) was noted in inclination (P = 0.135) or version (P = 0.445) between groups. Greater planned version correction was correlated with greater error when PSI was utilized (PSI r = 0.519, P = 0.013; Non-PSI r = 0.362, P = 0.089). CONCLUSION: Both PSI and 3D computer-assisted planning without PSI (Non-PSI) appear to be useful techniques to achieve version and inclination correction among patients undergoing RSA with severe glenoid deformity required glenoid bone grafting with no clear superiority of one method over the other. Surgeons should be aware that when utilizing PSI, slightly greater error in achieving version goals may occur as version correction is increased.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty or nothing for patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to nonoperative treatment for patients presenting with complex proximal fractures have been rarely explored. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the functional results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of nonsurgical treatment in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: A multicentric prospective randomized control trial of patients older than 70 years who sustained an acute proximal humeral fracture (3 or 4 parts), with less than 3 weeks of evolution, and had no previous condition or surgery on the affected shoulder was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (implantation of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty and tuberosities reattachment) or the control group (nonoperative treatment). Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the 1-year follow-up. Complications and reinterventions were considered secondary outcomes. The power of the study relied on the inclusion of 81 patients to recognize a statistically significant difference of 10 points between CMS scores in the groups. Analysis was performed based on the intention to treat principle. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized to surgical treatment or nonoperative treatment, while 66 patients completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age (76.1 yo vs. 77.43 yo, P = .43), sex (81.08% women in the surgical group vs. 84.09% in the nonoperative group, P = .72), or type of fracture according to Neer's classification system (P = .06). At the 1-year follow-up, the group assigned to undergo the intervention had better functional outcomes than the nonoperative treatment group (mean CMS; 61.24, SD: 13.33 vs. mean CMS: 52.44, SD: 16.22, P: .02), with a mean difference of 8.84 points, 95% CI (1.57, 16.11). Two patients in the intervention group (6.5%) suffered major complications (periprosthetic joint infection and axillary nerve palsy). No major complications were observed in the nonoperative group. One patient in the intervention group underwent secondary surgery for a periprosthetic joint infection. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides superior functional outcomes compared with conservative treatment for patients presenting with an acute proximal humeral fracture. The difference in CMS is close to the clinically significant thresholds, and some harms are associated with the operative treatment.

Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid.

BACKGROUND: Optimal glenosphere positioning in a lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to maximize functional outcomes has yet to be clearly defined. Center of rotation (COR) measurements have largely relied on anteroposterior radiographs, which allow assessment of lateralization and inferior position, but ignore scapular Y radiographs, which may provide an assessment of the posterior and inferior position relative to the acromion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the COR in the sagittal plane and assess the effect of glenosphere positioning with functional outcomes using a 135° inlay stem with a lateralized glenoid. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively maintained multicenter database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015 to 2021 with a 135° inlay stem. The COR was measured on minimum 2-year postoperative sagittal plain radiographs using a best-fit circle fit method. A best-fit circle was made on the glenosphere and the center was marked. From there, 4 measurements were made: (1) center to the inner cortex of the coracoid, (2) center to the inner cortex of the anterior acromion, (3) center to the inner cortex of the middle acromion, and (4) center to the inner cortex of the posterior acromion. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate any association between the position of the COR relative to bony landmarks with functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 136 RSAs met the study criteria. There was no relation with any of the distances with outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, visual analog scale). In regard to range of motion (ROM), each distance had an effect on at least 1 parameter. The COR to coracoid distance had the broadest association with ROM, with improvements in forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER0), and internal rotation with the arm at 90° (IR90) (P < .001, P = .031, and P < .001, respectively). The COR to coracoid distance was also the only distance to affect the final FF and IR90. For every 1-mm increase in this distance, there was a 1.8° increase in FF and 1.5° increase in IR90 (ß = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.72, P < .001, and ß = 1.53, 95% CI 0.65-2.41, P < .001; respectively). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the COR following RSA in the sagittal plane suggests that a posteroinferior glenosphere position may improve ROM when using a 135° inlay humeral component and a lateralized glenoid.

Do preoperative scapular fractures affect long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Postoperative scapular stress fractures (SSFs) are a formidable problem after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Less is known about patients who have these fractures preoperatively. The primary aim of this study was to examine postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing primary RSA who have preoperative SSF and compared to a matched cohort without preoperative fracture. The secondary aim was to examine the differences in patient-reported outcomes between and within study cohorts. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of primary RSAs performed by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2020 was conducted. Patients diagnosed with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), massive cuff tear (MCT), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included. Five hundred twenty-five shoulders met inclusion criteria. Fractures identified on preoperative computed tomography scans were divided into 3 groups: (1) os acromiale, (2) multifragments (MFs), and (3) Levy types. Seventy-two shoulders had an occurrence of SSF. The remaining 453 shoulders were separated into a nonfractured cohort. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared pre- and postoperatively in the total fracture group and the nonfractured group cohort. The multifragment subgroup was also compared to the pooled Os/Levy subgroup. RESULTS: The total incidence of SSF in all shoulders was 13.7%. There was a difference in satisfaction scores at all time points between the nonfracture (7.9 ± 2.8) and total fracture group (5.4 ± 3.6, P < .001, at last visit). There was also a greater ASES total score in the nonfractured group vs the total fracture group at the final visit (69.4 ± 23.4 and 62.1 ± 24.2; P = .02). The MF group had worse ASES functional or VAS functional scores than the Os/Levy group at all time points: at 1 year, ASES function: MF 24.2 ± 14.5 and Os/Levy 30.7 ± 14.2 (P = .045); at 2 years, ASES function: MF 21.4 ± 14.4 and Os/Levy 35.5 ± 10.6 (P < .001); and at last follow-up, VAS function: MF 4.8 ± 2.8 and Os/Levy 6.4 ± 3.2 (P = .023). DISCUSSION: Scapular fractures were proportionally most common in patients diagnosed with CTA (16.3%) compared with a 9.2% and 8.6% incidence in patients diagnosed with MCT and RA, respectively. Patients with preoperative SSF still see an improvement in ASES scores after RSA but do have lower satisfaction scores compared with the nonfractured cohort. The multifragment fracture group has lower functional and satisfaction scores at all postoperative time points compared with both the nonfracture and the Os/Levy fracture group.

Single Shot Interscalene Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Non-Liposomal Bupivacaine in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia is a valuable component of multimodal pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and multiple interscalene block anesthetic options exist, including non-liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (NLIB) and liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (LIB). The purpose of the current of study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption within 48 hours postoperative in those undergoing TSA with either LIB or NLIB. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic medical center including consecutive patients undergoing inpatient (>23-hour hospitalization) primary anatomic or reverse TSA from 2016 to 2020 who received either LIB or a NLIB for perioperative pain control. Perioperative patient outcomes were collected including pain levels and opioid usage, as well as 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmissions. The primary outcome was postoperative pain and opioid use. RESULTS: Overall, 489 patients were included in this study (316 LIB and 173 NLIB). Pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 48 hours postoperatively were not statistically significantly different (p>0.05 for all). However, the LIB group had improved pain scores at 24- and 36-hours postoperative (p<0.05 all). There was no difference in the incidence of severe postoperative pain, defined as a 9 or 10 NRS-11 score, between the two anesthesia groups after adjusting for preoperative pain and baseline opioid use (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.57-2.74; p=0.57). Overall, 99/316 (31.3%) of patients receiving LIB did not require any postoperative opioids compared with 38/173 (22.0%) receiving NLIB; however, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for prior opioid use and preoperative pain (p=0.33). No statistically significant differences in postoperative total morphine equivalents or mean daily morphine equivalents consumed between the groups were found during their hospital stays (p>0.05 for both). Finally, no significant differences in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates were found (all p>0.05). CONCLUSION: LIB and NLIB demonstrated differences in patient reported pain scores at 24- and 36-hours post operation, although these did not reach clinical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption during the hospital stay, including opioid use, total morphine equivalents and daily mean morphine equivalents consumed during the hospital stay. Additionally, no differences were observed in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates.

Outcomes and complications of revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to systematically review the evidence in the literature to ascertain the functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and complication and reoperation rates after revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for a failed primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). METHODS: Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes for revision RSA for a failed primary TSA or HA. RESULTS: Our review found 23 studies including 1041 shoulders (627 TSA and 414 HA) meeting our inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (66.1%), with an average age of 69.0 years (range: 39-93 years) and a mean follow-up of 46.3 months. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and visual analog scale pain scores improved from 32.6 to 61.9 and 6.7 to 2.7, respectively. ROM results include forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation, which improved from 59.4° to 107.7°, 50.7° to 104.4°, and 19.8° to 26.3°, respectively. Only 1 of the 10 studies reporting internal rotation found a statistically significant difference, with the mean internal rotation improving from S1-S3 preoperatively to L4-L5 postoperatively for patients undergoing HA. The overall complication rate and reoperation rate were 23.4% and 12.5%, respectively. The most common complications were glenoid component loosening (6.0%), fracture (periprosthetic, intraoperative, or other scapula fractures) (n = 4.7%), and infection (n = 3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Revision RSA for a failed primary TSA and HA has been shown to result in excellent functional outcomes and improved ROM, suggesting that patients who have failed TSA or HA may benefit from a revision RSA.

Utility of superior augments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (Exactech, Equinoxe GPS) without significant glenoid deformity.

BACKGROUND: Superior augment use may help avoid superior tilt while minimizing removal of inferior glenoid bone. Therefore, our goal was to compare superior augments vs. no-augment baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for patients with rotator cuff dysfunction and no significant superior glenoid erosion. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 145 patients who underwent RSA with intraoperative navigation (Equinoxe GPS; Exactech) and 3-year follow-up (mean 32 months' follow-up, range 20-61 months) who had preoperative superior inclination less than 10° and retroversion less than 15°. Patient demographics, radiographic measurements, surgical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes at preoperative and postoperative visit closest to 3 years, and adverse events at final follow-up were obtained. Operative time, planned inclination, and planned version of the baseplate were obtained. χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables, and Student t test was used to compare the augment and no-augment cohorts. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 54 superior augment patients and 91 no-augment patients. The augment cohort had lower body mass index (27.2 vs. 29.4, P = .023) and higher native superior inclination (5.9° vs. 1.4°, P < .001). No difference between the augment and no-augment cohorts was found regarding age (P = .643), gender (P = .314), medical comorbidities (P > .05), surgical indication (P = .082), and native glenoid version (P = .564). The augment cohort had higher internal rotation score (4.6 vs. 3.9, P = .023), and all remaining range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) preoperatively were not significantly different. At final follow-up, active ROM in all planes was not different between the cohorts. Regarding PROs, the postoperative Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score was significantly higher (78.0 vs. 73.6, P = .042), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score trended toward higher (83.6 vs. 77.5, P = .063) in the augment cohort. The augment cohort had a significantly lower proportion of patients who planned to have superior baseplate tilt (1.9% vs. 14.3%, P = .012) and had greater mean inclination correction (6.3° vs. 1.3°, P < .001), compared with the no-augment cohort. Adverse events were rare, and there was no significant difference found between the augment and no-augment cohorts (5.6% vs. 3.3%, P = .509). DISCUSSION: Superior augmented baseplate in RSA with minimal superior glenoid erosion is associated with similar ROM and adverse events with somewhat improved postoperative PROs compared with nonaugmented baseplates at the 3-year follow-up. Additionally, superior augments resulted in a greater proportion of baseplates planned to avoid superior tilt, and trended toward shorter operative times. Further investigation of long-term glenoid baseplate loosening is imperative to fully understand the cost-effectiveness of superior augments in the setting of minimal glenoid deformity.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture has comparable 10-year outcomes to elective indications: results from the New Zealand Joint Registry.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Recently, the indication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded beyond rotator cuff arthropathy to include treatment of complex acute proximal humeral fracture (PHF). Limited previous studies have compared the long-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing RTSA for PHF vs. elective indications for degenerative conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare implant survivorship, reasons for revision and functional outcomes in patients undergoing RTSA for acute PHF with those undergoing elective RTSA in a population-based cohort study. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from the New Zealand Joint Registry from 1999 to 2021 and identified 6862 patients who underwent RTSA. Patients were categorized by preoperative indication, including PHF (10.8%), rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) (44.5%), osteoarthritis (OA) (34.1%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (5.5%), and old traumatic sequelae (5.1%). Revision-free implant survival and functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Scores [OSSs] at the 6-month, 5-year, and 10-year follow-ups) were adjusted by age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and surgeon experience and compared. RESULTS: Revision-free implant survival at 10 years for RTSA for PHF was 97.3%, compared with 96.1%, 93.7%, 92.8%, and 91.3% for OA, RCA, RA and traumatic sequelae, respectively. When compared with RTSA for PHF, the adjusted risk of revision was significantly higher for traumatic sequelae (hazard ratio = 2.3, P = .023) but not for other elective indications. The most common reason for revision in the PHF group was dislocation or instability (42.9%), which was similar to the OA (47.6%) and traumatic sequelae (33.3%) groups. At 6 months post-surgery, OSSs were significantly lower for the PHF group compared with the RCA, OA, and RA groups (31.1 vs. 35.6, 37.7, and 36.5, respectively, P < .001), and similar to traumatic sequelae (31.7, P = .431). At 5 years, OSSs were only significantly lower for PHF compared with OA (37.4 vs. 41.0, P < .001) and there was no difference between the PHF and other groups. At 10 years, there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RTSA for PHF demonstrated reliable long-term survivorship and functional outcomes compared with elective indications. Despite lower functional outcomes in the early postoperative period for the PHF group, implant survivorship was similar in patients undergoing RTSA for the primary indication of acute PHF compared with RCA, OA, and RA and superior compared to the primary indication of traumatic sequelae.