Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(8)2020 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316334

RESUMO

Sperm cryopreservation represents a powerful tool for livestock breeding. Several efforts have been made to improve the efficiency of sperm cryopreservation in different ruminant species. However, a significant amount of sperm still suffers considerable cryodamage, which may affect sperm quality and fertility. Recently, the use of different "omics" technologies in sperm cryobiology, especially proteomics studies, has led to a better understanding of the molecular modifications induced by sperm cryopreservation, facilitating the identification of different freezability biomarkers and certain proteins that can be added before cryopreservation to enhance sperm cryosurvival. This review provides an updated overview of the molecular mechanisms involved in sperm cryodamage, which are in part responsible for the structural, functional and fertility changes observed in frozen-thawed ruminant sperm. Moreover, the molecular basis of those factors that can affect the sperm freezing resilience of different ruminant species is also discussed as well as the molecular aspects of those novel strategies that have been developed to reduce sperm cryodamage, including new cryoprotectants, antioxidants, proteins, nanoparticles and vitrification.


Assuntos
Criopreservação , Preservação do Sêmen , Espermatozoides/metabolismo , Animais , Cromatina/fisiologia , Metabolismo Energético , Masculino , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Ruminantes , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides/fisiologia
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 102(1): 768-779, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343921

RESUMO

A direct comparison of cow and goat performance and milk fatty acid (FA) responses to diets that either induce milk fat depression or increase milk fat content in cows suggests species-specific regulation of lipid metabolism, including mammary lipogenesis. This experiment was conducted to highlight potential mechanisms responsible for the differences in mammary lipogenesis due to diet and ruminant species. Twelve Holstein cows and 12 Alpine goats were fed a basal diet containing no additional lipid (CTL) or a similar diet supplemented with corn oil [5% dry matter intake (DMI)] and wheat starch (COS), marine algae powder (MAP; 1.5% DMI), or hydrogenated palm oil (HPO; 3% DMI), according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 28-d experimental periods. Milk yield, milk composition, FA profile, and secretions were measured. On d 27 of each experimental period, the mRNA abundance of 21 genes involved in lipid metabolism or enzyme activities or both were measured in mammary tissue sampled by biopsy. The results showed significant differences in the milk fat response of cows and goats to the dietary treatments. In cows, fat content was lowered by COS (-45%) and MAP (-22%) and increased by HPO (+13%) compared with CTL, and in goats only MAP had an effect compared with CTL, with a decrease of 15%. In both species, COS and MAP lowered the yields (mmol/d per kilogram of body weight) of C16 FA in goats but not in cows, and the >C16 FA yield decreased with MAP in both species. Supplementation of HPO increased the yield of milk C16 FA (mmol/d per kilogram of body weight) in cows. These variations in milk fat content and FA secretion were not associated with modifications in the mammary expression of 21 genes involved in major lipid pathways, except for 3 transcription factors: PPARA, INSIG1, and SP1. This absence of large changes might be due to post-transcriptional regulation of these genes and related to the time of sampling of the mammary tissue relative to the previous meal and milking or to differences in the availability of substrate for the corresponding proteins. However, the abundance of 14 mRNA among the 21 encoding for genes studied in the mammary gland was significantly different among species, with 5 more abundant in cows (FADS3, ACSL1, PPARA, LXRA, and PPARG1) and 10 more abundant in goats (FASN, CD36, FABP3, LPL, GPAM, LPIN1, CSN2, MFGE8, and INSIG1). These species specificities of mammary lipid metabolism require further investigation.


Assuntos
Bovinos/metabolismo , Clorófitas/metabolismo , Óleo de Milho/metabolismo , Cabras/metabolismo , Lipogênese , Glândulas Mamárias Animais/metabolismo , Óleo de Palmeira/metabolismo , Amido/metabolismo , Ração Animal/análise , Animais , Bovinos/genética , Dieta/veterinária , Suplementos Nutricionais/análise , Ácidos Graxos/metabolismo , Feminino , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Cabras/genética , Lactação/fisiologia , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Leite/química , Óleos de Plantas/farmacologia
3.
J Dairy Sci ; 101(9): 8429-8445, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29885893

RESUMO

A direct comparative study of dairy cows and goats was performed to characterize the animal performance and milk fatty acid (FA) responses to 2 types of diets that induce milk fat depression in cows as well as a diet that increases milk fat content in cows but for which the effects in goats are either absent or unknown. Twelve Holstein cows and 12 Alpine goats, all multiparous, nonpregnant, and at 86 ± 24.9 and 61 ± 1.8 DIM, respectively, were allocated to 1 of 4 groups and fed diets containing no additional lipid (CTL) or diets supplemented with corn oil [5% dry matter intake (DMI)] and wheat starch (COS), marine algae powder (MAP; 1.5% DMI), or hydrogenated palm oil (HPO; 3% DMI), according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 28-d experimental periods. Dietary treatments had no significant effects on milk yield and DMI in both species, except for COS in cows, which decreased DMI by 17%. In cows, milk fat content was lowered by COS (-45%) and MAP (-22%) and increased by HPO (13%) compared with CTL, and in goats only MAP had an effect compared with CTL by decreasing milk fat content by 15%. In both species, COS and MAP lowered the yields (mmol/d per kg of BW) of C16 FA in goats, but not in cows, and the >C16 FA yield decreased with MAP in both species. HPO supplementation increased the milk yield of C16 FA in cows. Compared with CTL, COS induced an increase of trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid by 18 fold in cows and 7 fold in goats and of trans-10 18:1 by 13 fold in cows and 3 fold in goats. Moreover, other conjugated linoleic acid isomers, such as trans-10,trans-12 and trans-7,cis-9, were increased to a greater extent in cows (8 and 4 fold, respectively) compared with goats (4 and 2 fold, respectively) on the COS treatment. In both species, the responses to MAP were characterized by a decrease in the milk concentration of 18:0 (3 fold, on average) and cis-9 18:1 (2 fold, on average) combined with a 3-fold increase in the total trans 18:1, with an increase in trans-10 18:1 only observed in cows. Compared with CTL, the response to HPO was distinguished by an increase in 16:0 (10%) in cows. This comparative study clearly demonstrated that each ruminant species responds differently to COS and HPO treatments, whereas MAP caused similar effects, and that goats are less sensitive than cows to diets that induce a shift from the trans-11 toward the trans-10 ruminal pathways.


Assuntos
Bovinos , Indústria de Laticínios/métodos , Dieta/veterinária , Cabras , Leite/química , Animais , Óleo de Milho , Suplementos Nutricionais , Ácidos Graxos , Feminino , Lactação , Óleo de Palmeira , Amido
4.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 277: 110829, 2024 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39316948

RESUMO

Ruminant livestock exhibit certain immune characteristics that make them valuable models for studying T cell receptor diversity and immune responses. This resistance is attributed to their well-developed immune system, comprising both innate and adaptive components. In this review, we delve into the intricate workings of the immune system of ruminant livestock, focusing on innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Specifically, we discuss the TR V(D)J genes (including TRB, TRG, and TRA/D chain) and the characteristics of the complementary determining region 3 (CDR3) repertoire in bovine and ovine species, shedding light on the diversity and functionality of the T-cell receptor(TCR) repertoire in these species. Understanding the distinct features of these germline genes and CDR3 repertoires is essential for unraveling the complexities of immune responses in ruminant livestock. Lastly, we outline future prospects in this field, emphasizing the importance of further research to enhance our understanding of ruminant livestock immunity and its potential applications in disease management, vaccine development, and breeding strategies.

5.
Animals (Basel) ; 12(16)2022 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36009603

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare the diversity and composition of fecal bacteria in goats and cows offered the same diet and to evaluate the influence of animal species on the gut microbiome. A total of 17 female goats (Blond Adamellan) and 16 female cows (Brown Swiss) kept on an organic farm were fed pasture and hay. Bacterial structure in feces was examined by high-throughput sequencing using the V4-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The Alpha diversity measurements of the bacterial community showed no statistical differences in species richness and diversity between the two groups of ruminants. However, the Pielou evenness index revealed a significant difference and showed higher species evenness in cows compared to goats. Beta diversity measurements showed statistical dissimilarities and significant clustering of bacterial composition between goats and cows. Firmicutes were the dominant phylum in both goats and cows, followed by Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Spirochaetes. Linear discriminant analysis with effect size (LEfSe) showed a total of 36 significantly different taxa between goats and cows. Notably, the relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae UCG-005, Christensenellaceae R-7 group, Ruminococcaceae UCG-010, Ruminococcaceae UCG-009, Ruminococcaceae UCG-013, Ruminococcaceae UCG-014, Ruminococcus 1, Ruminococcaceae UCG-002, Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group, Treponema 2, Lachnospiraceae AC2044 group, and Bacillus was higher in goats compared to cows. In contrast, the relative abundance of Turicibacter, Solibacillus, Alloprevotella, Prevotellaceae UCG-001, Negativibacillus, Lachnospiraceae UCG-006, and Eubacterium hallii group was higher in cows compared with goats. Our results suggest that diet shapes the bacterial community in feces, but the host species has a significant impact on community structure, as reflected primarily in the relative abundance of certain taxa.

6.
EFSA J ; 17(6): e05723, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626345

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Levucell® SC when used in feed for calves and minor ruminant species and camelids at the same developmental stage. The additive consists of viable cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. This approach requires the identity of the strain to be conclusively established. The strain was found to meet the criteria for the QPS approach in the context of previous opinions and since concerns are not expected from other components of the additive, Levucell® SC is presumed safe for all target species, consumers of products derived from animals fed the additive and for the environment. The Panel considers these conclusions to apply also in the current assessment. In a previous opinion, the Panel also concluded that the additive is considered an eye irritant but not a dermal irritant or sensitiser and that inhalation exposure is unlikely. Since the use of the additive in calves and minor ruminant species and camelids at the same developmental stage is considered unlikely to introduce hazards for users of the product not already considered as part of the first assessment, these conclusions are still considered valid. Levucell SC ® has the potential to be efficacious in calves at the minimum inclusion level of 1 × 109 CFU/kg complete feed. The conclusion on efficacy for calves can be extrapolated to minor ruminant species and camelids at the same developmental stage.

7.
Anim Health Res Rev ; 19(2): 113-124, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30683171

RESUMO

Coronaviruses (CoVs) produce a wide spectrum of disease syndromes in different mammalian and avian host species. These viruses are well-recognized for their ability to change tissue tropism, to hurdle the interspecies barriers and to adapt ecological variations. It is predicted that the inherent genetic diversity of CoVs caused by accumulation of point mutations and high frequency of homologous recombination is the principal determinant of these competences. Several CoVs (e.g. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV) have been recorded to cross the interspecies barrier, inducing different disease conditions in variable animal hosts. Bovine CoV (BCoV) is a primary cause of gastroenteritis and respiratory disease in cattle calves, winter dysentery in lactating cows and shipping fever pneumonia in feedlot cattle. Although it has long been known as a restrictive cattle pathogen, CoVs that are closely related to BCoV have been recognized in dogs, humans and in other ruminant species. Biologic, antigenic and genetic analyses of the so-called 'bovine-like CoVs' proposed classification of these viruses as host-range variants rather than distinct virus species. In this review, the different bovine-like CoVs that have been identified in domesticated ruminants (water buffalo, sheep, goat, dromedary camel, llama and alpaca) and wild ruminants (deer, wild cattle, antelopes, giraffes and wild goats) are discussed in terms of epidemiology, transmission and virus characteristics. The presented data denote the importance of these viruses in the persistence of BCoV in nature, spread to new geographical zones, and continuous emergence of disease epidemics in cattle farms.


Assuntos
Animais Selvagens/virologia , Doenças dos Bovinos/virologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/veterinária , Coronavirus/classificação , Gado/virologia , Ruminantes/virologia , Animais , Bovinos , Coronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos
8.
EFSA J ; 15(7): e04944, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32625596

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Levucell® SC for dairy cows, cattle for fattening, all minor ruminant species and camelids. The additive consists of viable cells of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisae and is sold in three formulations. The FEEDAP Panel considers that the three available formulations are equivalent when used to deliver the same dose. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the qualified presumption of safety approach to the assessment of safety and since no concerns are expected from other components, Levucell® SC can be presumed safe for target animals, consumers of products from treated animals and the environment. Levucell® SC is not a skin irritant or sensitiser but is an eye irritant. Inhalation exposure is unlikely. Encapsulation is not expected to introduce hazards for users. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Levucell® SC for dairy cows, minor dairy ruminant species or dairy camelids. Levucell® SC has a potential to improve the performance of cattle raised for fattening when supplied at a minimum dose of 8 × 109 CFU/head and day which would approximate to 6 × 108 CFU/kg complete feed. This conclusion is extended to minor ruminant species and camelids reared for meat production at the same minimum dose of 6 × 108 CFU/kg complete feed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA