Global associations between the use of basic drinking water and sanitation services with diarrhoeal disease incidence in 200 countries and territories from 2000 to 2019.

OBJECTIVES: Globally, billions of people do not have access to safely managed drinking water and sanitation services. Interventions to improve drinking water, sanitation and hygiene could reduce the incidence of diarrhoea in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to investigate the association between these services and the incidence of diarrhoea. STUDY DESIGN: Worldwide, ecological observational study, utilising cross-sectional data. METHODS: Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 and World Bank were used in this study. Diarrhoeal disease episodes were defined as three or more loose bowel movements within 24 h. Estimated Annual Percentage Change was used to quantify trends in disease incidence over a specific time interval. Quasi-Poisson Generalised Linear Model was introduced to analyse the influence of basic drinking water and sanitation services on the incidence of diarrhoea. Subgroup analyses were carried out to determine potential variations in the incidence of diarrhoeal diseases according to sex, age and sociodemographic index (SDI) region. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2019, the incidence rate of global diarrhoea remained consistent, with regional variations linked to SDIs. A 1% increase in access to basic drinking water was associated with a 0.41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33%-0.50%) increase in the age-standardised incidence rate of diarrhoea; meanwhile, a 1% increase in sanitation service usage was associated with a 0.47% (95% CI, 0.40%-0.54%) reduction in the age-standardised incidence rate of diarrhoea. The correlation differed across SDI regions. The use of safely managed drinking water was associated with a reduction in diarrhoeal disease rates, but the effect was non-significant in High SDI regions. Higher diarrhoeal disease incidence was seen in younger and older populations. Individuals in the age groups 55-59 years and 10-14 years showed the greatest association of water service usage with diarrhoea, while an increase in sanitation service usage was related to decreased diarrhoea rates in most age groups, excluding children aged 5-14 years. CONCLUSIONS: Emphasising initiatives to enhance water quality, elevate the standards of drinking water safety management, and strengthening related infrastructure development in global health policies and development plans could have a positive impact on overall global health. Such comprehensive interventions have the potential to not only prevent waterborne diseases but also elevate the general health status of societies worldwide.

Assessing the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on the microbial quality of an urban water catchment and the associated probability of waterborne infections.

The World Health Organization reported that COVID-19 cases reached 611,421,786 globally by September 23, 2022. Six months after the first reported case, the disease had spread rapidly, reaching pandemic status, leading to numerous preventive measures to curb the spread, including a complete shutdown of many activities worldwide. Such restrictions affected services like waste management, resulting in waste accumulation in many communities and increased water pollution. Therefore, the current study investigated if lockdown impacted surface water microbial quality within an urban water catchment in South Africa. Using quantitative microbial risk assessment, the study further assessed changes in the probability of infection (Pi) with gastrointestinal illnesses from exposure to polluted water in the catchment. Escherichia coli data for 2019, 2020 and 2021 - pre-COVID, lockdown, and post-lockdown periods, respectively - were collected from the area's wastewater treatment management authorities. The Pi was determined using a beta-Poisson model. Mean overall E. coli counts ranged from 2.93 ± 0.16 to 5.30 ± 1.07 Log10 MPN/100 mL. There was an overall statistically significant increase in microbial counts from 2019 to 2021. However, this difference was only accounted for between 2019 and 2021 (p = 0.008); the increase was insignificant between 2019 and 2020, and 2020 and 2021. The Pi revealed a similar trend for incidental ingestion of 100 mL and 1 mL of polluted water. No statistically significant difference was observed between the years based on multiple exposures. Although the overall microbial load and Pi estimated within the catchment exceeded the local and international limits recommended for safe use by humans, especially for drinking and recreation, these were not significantly affected by the COVID-19 restrictions. Nevertheless, these could still represent a health hazard to immunocompromised individuals using such water for personal and household hygiene, especially in informal settlements without access to water and sanitation services.

Applying a WASH Risk Assessment Tool in a Rural South African Setting to Identify Risks and Opportunities for Climate Resilient Communities.

Climate change threatens the health and well-being of populations. We conducted a risk assessment of two climate-related variables (i.e., temperature and rainfall) and associated water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)-related exposures and vulnerabilities for people living in Mopani District, Limpopo province, South Africa. Primary and secondary data were applied in a qualitative and quantitative assessment to generate classifications of risk (i.e., low, medium, or high) for components of hazard/threat, human exposure, and human vulnerability. Climate-related threats were likely to impact human health due to the relatively high risk of waterborne diseases and WASH-associated pathogens. Vulnerabilities that increased the susceptibility of the population to these adverse outcomes included environmental, human, physical infrastructure, and political and institutional elements. People of low socio-economic status were found to be least likely to cope with changes in these hazards. By identifying and assessing the risk to sanitation services and water supply, evidence exists to inform actions of government and WASH sector partners. This evidence should also be used to guide disaster risk reduction, and climate change and human health adaptation planning.

Correlates of access to sanitation facilities and benefits received from the Swachh Bharat Mission in India: analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2018 National Sample Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Equitable and affordable access to improved sanitation facilities is linked to health and is among the priority areas of development programmes in a country like India. This study assesses the level of different sanitation facilities accessed by households and attempts to understand the socioeconomic characteristics of the households that received financial benefits from the Swachh Bharat Mission (Swachh Bharat Abhiyan), a Government of India flagship programme. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study extracted data from the 76th round (2018) of the National Sample Survey, consisting of 106 837 households in India. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sanitation services and benefits received from the Swachh Bharat Mission in the last 3 years preceding the survey were the two outcome variables of this study. Bivariate and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with the outcome variables. RESULTS: Findings show the existence of state and regional disparities, along with rural-urban gaps, in the accessibility of sanitation facilities. Half of the households (52%, n=55 555) had access to safely managed sanitation facilities, followed by basic services (14.8%, n=15 812), limited services (11.4%, n=12 179) and unimproved services/open defecation (21.8%, n=23 290). Limited and unimproved facilities decreased significantly (p<0.001) with increase in economic status, although poor and less educated households received the maximum benefit from the Swachh Bharat Mission. CONCLUSION: The mission has been successful in increasing access overall; however, many people continue to lack access to improved sanitation and there remains a need to follow up poor and rural households to determine their usage of and the current state of their sanitation facilities.

Sustainable water and sanitation for all: Are we there yet?

The lack of access to water and sanitation services (WSS) of a considerable share of the world population has been challenging the international community for decades. The proposal of the Millennium Development Goals and, later on, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations (UN) intended to act as a blueprint to achieve a more equitable future for all and, in the case of WSS, "Ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all" (SDG 6). However, the current global pandemic further emphasised the importance of WSS, given the increasing asymmetries faced by billions worldwide, and the gaps between high-income and low- and middle-income nations. For this reason, understanding whether low- and middle-income countries have been approximating towards or deviating from the SDG 6 is crucial to derive and communicate key information for the sake of improved public governance and political decision-making. In this paper, we extend a state-of-the-art methodology based on data envelopment analysis for assessing the convergence of the low- and middle-income UN Member States regarding the SDG 6 between 2016 and 2017. We find that, on average, not only did the Member States converge by decreasing the performance spread and the gap between the best and worst practice frontiers, but also the Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources was the indicator in which the majority exhibited the worst performances. In the end, we derive possible policy implications, which, as our results show, are aligned with the recent UN reports on the subject.