Multiple Adverse Reactions Associated With the Use of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in People With Alzheimer's Disease: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition leading to memory loss, cognitive impairment, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are commonly used to manage these neuropsychiatric symptoms, but their safety profile in patients with AD requires further investigation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the safety of SGAs in patients with AD by analyzing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: This study conducted a comprehensive analysis of FAERS data from 2014 to 2023, focusing on ADRs in patients with AD treated with SGAs such as risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, and aripiprazole. Descriptive, disproportionality, time, and dose analysis were performed using the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, Weibull, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Out of 1289 patients with AD treated with SGAs, the most common ADRs involved the nervous system, gastrointestinal system, and cardiac disorders. Disproportionality analysis identified significant positive signals in cardiac, renal, and vascular systems. Quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine showed more positive signals compared with clozapine and aripiprazole. Time analysis indicated that cardiovascular ADRs occurred randomly, whereas renal ADRs increased with prolonged use. Dose analysis suggested that small doses of SGAs did not elevate the risk of multiple cardiac, renal, or vascular ADRs. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The study underscores the importance of monitoring for ADRs, particularly in the cardiac and renal systems, when using SGAs in patients with AD. Future research incorporating more comprehensive clinical data is warranted to support safe and rational drug utilization.

Adjunctive cariprazine for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Converging evidence has suggested that treatment augmentation with a second-generation atypical antipsychotic (SGA) may improve treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after an incomplete response to a first-line antidepressant. Cariprazine is a recently approved SGA for MDD augmentation. Herein, we evaluate both continuous (ie, change in depressive symptom severity scores over time) and categorical (ie, remission and response rates) outcomes. Following a full-text review, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis, while five studies were included for a qualitative review. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all included randomized controlled studies to determine the relative response and remission rates of cariprazine compared to placebo augmentation. The RR for all-cause dropout was also determined as a proxy for overall acceptability. Two studies found a statistically significant treatment response using cariprazine augmentation. One study observed depressive symptom remission for cariprazine compared to placebo. Our random-effects model revealed moderate antidepressant effects of cariprazine, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of -1.79 (95% CI): -2.89, -0.69). Our pooled response RR and remission RR were calculated as 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.39, P=0.008) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.17, P=0.91), respectively. The RR for response was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the RR for remission was not statistically significant. The findings from our meta-analysis include a variable magnitude of effects. Evidence suggests cariprazine may be an effective treatment for MDD; however, further results are needed to clarify this relation.

Randomized open-label study of second-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: 104-week final results of the JUMPs study assessing treatment discontinuation, remission, and social functioning.

BACKGROUND: We report the final results of treatment with aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone from the Japan Useful Medication Program for Schizophrenia (JUMPs), a 104-week naturalistic study. METHODS: JUMPs was an open-label, three-arm, randomized, parallel-group, 104-week study. Patients aged ≥ 20 years with schizophrenia requiring antipsychotic treatment or a switch from previous therapy were enrolled. The primary endpoint was treatment discontinuation rate over 104 weeks. Secondary endpoints included remission rate, Personal and Social Performance (PSP), safety, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and quality of life (QOL; EuroQol-5 dimension). RESULTS: In total, 251 patients received aripiprazole (n = 82), blonanserin (n = 85), or paliperidone (n = 84). Treatment discontinuation rates (aripiprazole, 80.5%; blonanserin, 81.2%; paliperidone, 71.4%) were not significantly different (p = 0.2385) among the treatment groups at 104 weeks; comparable outcomes were observed for endpoints, including remission (42.9%, 46.7%, and 45.8%), PANSS, and safety. In the overall cohort, while the improvement in the PSP total score at Week 104 was not significantly different from baseline, a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in QOL and total PANSS scores (including all subscales) was observed at Week 104 compared with baseline. Multivariable analysis identified a shorter disease duration and a higher chlorpromazine-equivalent antipsychotic dosage level (≥ 1000 mg) before switching to monotherapy as predictors of treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The 104-week treatment outcomes were comparable between groups; the overall trend of improvement in remission rate, safety, and QOL suggests the importance of continued treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000007942 (public release date: 14/05/2012).

Evaluation of Global Dystonia Rating Scale as a predictor of unfavorable outcomes among acute antipsychotics poisoned patients.

Worldwide, acute antipsychotic poisoning results in high morbidities and mortalities. Though extrapyramidal syndromes are commonly associated, the extent of extrapyramidal syndromes in relation to the severity of antipsychotic poisoning has not been addressed yet. Thus, this study aimed to assess the Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) as an unfavorable outcomes predictive tool in acute antipsychotic poisoning. A cross-sectional study included 506 antipsychotic-poisoned patients admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center, Egypt, over three years was conducted. The mean GDRS was 9.1 ± 16.7 in typical antipsychotic poisoning, which was significantly higher than that of atypical antipsychotics (4.2 ± 11.5) (p = 0.003). Patients with GDRS> 20 showed significantly higher liability for all adverse outcomes (p < 0.05). However, poisoning with typical antipsychotics was associated with significantly more cardiotoxicity (p = 0.042), particularly prolonged QRS (p = 0.005), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.000). In contrary to the PSS, which failed to predict the studied adverse outcomes, GDRS significantly predicted all adverse outcomes (p < 0.000) for all antipsychotic generations. In atypical antipsychotics, GDRS above three accurately predicted cardiotoxicities, prolonged QTc interval, and respiratory failure with Area under curves (AUC) of 0.937, 0.963, and 0.941, respectively. In typical antipsychotic poisoning, at higher cutoffs (7.5, 27.5, 18, and 7.5), cardiotoxicities, prolonged QTc interval, and respiratory failure were accurately predicted (AUC were 0.974, 0.961, and 0.960, respectively). GDRS is an objective, substantially useful tool that quantifies dystonia and can be used as an early reliable predictor of potential toxicity in acute antipsychotic poisoning.

The Effect of Neuropsychiatric Drugs on the Oxidation-Reduction Balance in Therapy.

The effectiveness of available neuropsychiatric drugs in the era of an increasing number of patients is not sufficient, and the complexity of neuropsychiatric disease entities that are difficult to diagnose and therapeutically is increasing. Also, discoveries about the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric diseases are promising, including those initiating a new round of innovations in the role of oxidative stress in the etiology of neuropsychiatric diseases. Oxidative stress is highly related to mental disorders, in the treatment of which the most frequently used are first- and second-generation antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and antidepressants. Literature reports on the effect of neuropsychiatric drugs on oxidative stress are divergent. They are starting with those proving their protective effect and ending with those confirming disturbances in the oxidation-reduction balance. The presented publication reviews the state of knowledge on the role of oxidative stress in the most frequently used therapies for neuropsychiatric diseases using first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs, i.e., haloperidol, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole, mood stabilizers: lithium, carbamazepine, valproic acid, oxcarbazepine, and antidepressants: citalopram, sertraline, and venlafaxine, along with a brief pharmacological characteristic, preclinical and clinical studies effects.

Atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and clozapine increase bone loss in female rats with experimental periodontitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Periodontitis is a highly prevalent disease in psychiatric patients, including those undergoing symptomatic treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. Some of these drugs, such as clozapine (CLO) and olanzapine (OLA), have prominent metabolic effects such as weight gain, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia, which are risk factors for periodontitis. In addition to the metabolic effects, there are reports of changes in salivary flow, gingival bleeding, and caries. In this context, we aimed to evaluate if the metabolic effects of OLA and CLO alter periodontal parameters in an animal model of periodontitis without the environmental and psychosocial biases inherent to human diseases. METHODS: In the first set of experiments, male and female adult Wistar rats received oral administration of CLO, OLA, or vehicle for 45 days. They were evaluated for body mass composition and weight gain, blood glucose parameters (fasting and glucose tolerance and insulin resistance tests), and lipid profile (HDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides). In a second set of experiments, the same measurements were performed in female rats exposed to the antipsychotics for 45 days and ligature-induced periodontitis on the 30th day of treatment. Macroscopic measurements of exposed roots, microtomography in the furcation region of the first molar, and histological evaluation of the region between the first and second molars were evaluated to assess bone loss. Additionally, gingival measurements of myeloperoxidase activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α were made. RESULTS: Only females exposed to OLA had more significant weight gain than controls. They also exhibited differences in glucose metabolism. Ligature-induced periodontitis produced intense bone retraction without changing the density of the remaining structures. The bone loss was even higher in rats with periodontitis treated with OLA or CLO and was accompanied by a local increase in TNF-α caused by CLO. These animals, however, did not exhibit the same metabolic impairments observed for animals without periodontitis. CONCLUSION: The use of clozapine and olanzapine may be a risk factor for periodontal disease, independent of systemic metabolic alterations.

The second-generation antipsychotic drug aripiprazole modulates the serotonergic system in pancreatic islets and induces beta cell dysfunction in female mice.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) drugs have been associated with the development of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of two different SGA drugs, olanzapine and aripiprazole, on metabolic state and islet function and plasticity. METHODS: We analysed the functional adaptation of beta cells in 12-week-old B6;129 female mice fed an olanzapine- or aripiprazole-supplemented diet (5.5-6.0 mg kg-1 day-1) for 6 months. Glucose and insulin tolerance tests, in vivo glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and indirect calorimetry were performed at the end of the study. The effects of SGAs on beta cell plasticity and islet serotonin levels were assessed by transcriptomic analysis and immunofluorescence. Insulin secretion was assessed by static incubations and Ca2+ fluxes by imaging techniques. RESULTS: Treatment of female mice with olanzapine or aripiprazole for 6 months induced weight gain (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively), glucose intolerance (p<0.01) and impaired insulin secretion (p<0.05) vs mice fed a control chow diet. Aripiprazole, but not olanzapine, induced serotonin production in beta cells vs controls, likely by increasing tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) expression, and inhibited Ca2+ flux. Of note, aripiprazole increased beta cell size (p<0.05) and mass (p<0.01) vs mice fed a control chow diet, along with activation of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)/S6 signalling, without preventing beta cell dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Both SGAs induced weight gain and beta cell dysfunction, leading to glucose intolerance; however, aripiprazole had a more potent effect in terms of metabolic alterations, which was likely a result of its ability to modulate the serotonergic system. The deleterious metabolic effects of SGAs on islet function should be considered while treating patients as these drugs may increase the risk for development of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes.

The Choice of Either Quetiapine or Aripiprazole as Augmentation Treatment in a European Naturalistic Sample of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) represents an evidence-based psychopharmacotherapeutic strategy recommended in case of insufficient response to the first-line antidepressant (AD) treatment in major depressive disorder (MDD). Comparative evidence regarding efficacy and prescription preferences of the individual SGAs is scarce. METHODS: In the scope of this European, multi-site, naturalistic cross-sectional investigation with retrospective assessment of treatment outcome, we compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of 187 MDD patients receiving either quetiapine (n = 150) or aripiprazole (n = 37) as augmentation of their first-line AD psychopharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and diabetes were significantly associated with aripiprazole augmentation in our primary and post-hoc binary logistic regression analyses. Furthermore, we identified an association between aripiprazole co-administration and the presence of additional psychotic features, higher rates of AD combination treatment, and a longer duration of psychiatric hospitalizations during the lifetime, which, however, lost significance after correcting for multiple comparisons. Regarding treatment outcome, we found a trend of higher response rates and greater reductions in severity of depressive symptoms in MDD patients dispensed quetiapine. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with a more chronic and severe profile of MDD seem to encourage clinicians to choose aripiprazole over quetiapine, that was, however, administered in the majority of our MDD patients, which might reflect the current approval situation allowing to prescribe exclusively quetiapine as on-label augmentation in MDD in Europe. Given the retrospective assessment of treatment response, the markedly smaller proportion of patients receiving aripiprazole augmentation generally showing an unfavorable disease profile, and the partially heterogeneous statistical robustness of our findings, further studies are required to elaborate on our observation and to generate unambiguous recommendations regarding the choice of first-line SGA augmentation in MDD.

Abuse and misuse of second-generation antipsychotics: An analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organisation pharmacovigilance database.

The study aim was to assess the abuse/misuse potential of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAPs) using VigiBase data. We extracted individual case safety reports of "Drug abuse, dependence and withdrawal" involving SGAPs up to June 2018. We assessed disproportionate reporting by calculating the information component, considering the lower end of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC025 ), and the proportional reporting ratio. We identified 1683 individual case safety reports recorded as "abuse, dependence and withdrawal" involving SGAPs, mainly quetiapine (n = 1089) and olanzapine (n = 209). The disproportional reporting indicators highlighted an association between "Drug abuse and dependence", and quetiapine, olanzapine and ziprasidone, as indicated by the IC025 (2.263, 0.259 and 1.051, respectively) and proportional reporting ratio values (3.929, 1.020 and 1.334, respectively). The abuse/misuse potential is confirmed for quetiapine and olanzapine and highlighted for the first time for ziprasidone. Physicians should consider these risks when prescribing these antipsychotics, especially to patients with history of drug abuse.

Incidence of hospital contacts with acute kidney injury after initiation of second-generation antipsychotics in older adults: a Danish population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) in older adults. METHODS: In a population-based cohort study using Danish national registries, new users of SGAs (aged ≥ 65) were identified during 2005-2015. Each SGA user was matched to 10 population controls on age, sex, and the SGA initiation date. The outcome was incident AKI within 90 days after the index date. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: In the study, 36,581 new SGA users and 365,810 controls were included. The 90-day incidence rate of AKI was 4.38 and 1.70 per 1000 person-years among SGA users and controls, respectively, corresponding to a crude HR of 2.57 (1.79-3.68). The fully adjusted HR (aHR) was 1.43 (0.89-2.27) for all SGAs. The risk differed among individual drugs with aHRs for olanzapine 3.50 (1.20-10.23), quetiapine 1.62 (0.81-3.26), and risperidone 0.68 (0.28-1.64). In sensitivity analyses, the aHR declined to 1.24 (0.95-1.61) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine use was associated with a significantly increased 90-day AKI risk. For quetiapine, the risk was elevated but not significant, and risperidone had no association. CIs were wide and confounder adjustment largely impacted the estimates. Main limitations included residual confounding and incomplete recording of AKI diagnoses.

Discontinuation and remission rates and social functioning in patients with schizophrenia receiving second-generation antipsychotics: 52-week evaluation of JUMPs, a randomized, open-label study.

AIM: Globally, evidence from short-term studies is insufficient for the guidelines to uniformly recommend a particular antipsychotic(s) for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. Therefore, long-term comprehensive evaluation of antipsychotics is required from a social rehabilitation perspective, especially for drugs that have not yet been studied. The Japan Useful Medication Program for Schizophrenia (JUMPs) is a large-scale, long-term naturalistic study to present pivotal 52-week data on the continuity of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA: aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone). METHODS: JUMPs was an open-label, three-arm, randomized, parallel-group, 52-week study. Enrolled patients had schizophrenia, were ≥20 years old, and required antipsychotic treatment or switched from previous therapy. The primary endpoint was treatment discontinuation rate over 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included remission rate, social functioning, and quality-of-life scores [Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) and EuroQol-5 dimensions], and safety. RESULTS: In total, 251 patients received aripiprazole (n = 82), blonanserin (n = 85), or paliperidone (n = 84). The discontinuation rate (P = 0.9771) and remission rates (P > 0.05) over 52 weeks did not differ significantly between the three treatment groups. The discontinuation rates were 68.3%, 68.2%, and 65.5% in the aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone groups, respectively. Significant improvements (all P < 0.05) from baseline in PSP scores were observed at start of monotherapy, week 26, and week 52 in the overall cohort and blonanserin group and at week 26 in the aripiprazole group. The adverse event profile favored blonanserin. CONCLUSION: All three SGAs evaluated in this study showed similar treatment discontinuation rates in patients with chronic schizophrenia in Japan.

Low Rates of Clinician Monitoring for Second Generation Antipsychotic Medications in Community Pediatric Practice.

Second generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications are frequently prescribed to pediatric patients in the United States. This retrospective observational study sought to ascertain the extent of adherence to established pediatric SGA monitoring guidelines in community practice. The team used the electronic health record to determine clinician adherence to SGA monitoring guidelines at baseline, 12-week, and annual times relative to prescribing an SGA. At the time of their SGA prescription, 5.5% of pediatric patients had received all of the orders according to the monitoring guidelines. Annually, 2.5% of patients had received the necessary orders to completely adhere to monitoring guidelines; 42% of patients received no monitoring orders. Monitoring was more likely for children who had multiple types of providers and interacted with the healthcare system beyond a traditional office visit. This research informs healthcare providers about the gap between prescribing and monitoring for SGA medications in community practice for pediatric populations.

Antipsychotic Drug Aripiprazole Protects Liver Cells from Oxidative Stress.

Antipsychotics used to treat schizophrenia can cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI), according to the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method. The role of oxidative stress in triggering injury in these DILI cases is unknown. We repeatedly administrated two second-generation antipsychotics, aripiprazole and olanzapine, at laboratory alert levels to study underlying mechanisms in stress prevention upon acute oxidative stress. The drugs were administered continuously for up to 8 weeks. For this, hepatoma Fao cells, which are suitable for metabolic studies, were used, as the primary hepatocytes survive in the culture only for about 1 week. Four stress responses-the oxidative stress response, the DNA damage response and the unfolded protein responses in the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria-were examined in H2O2-treated cells by antioxidant enzyme activity measurements, gene expression and protein quantification. Oxidant conditions increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes and upregulated genes and proteins associated with oxidative stress response in aripiprazole-treated cells. While the genes associated with DNA damage response, Gadd45 and p21, were upregulated in both aripiprazole- and olanzapine-treated cells, only aripiprazole treatment was associated with upregulation in response to even more H2O2, which also coincided with better survival. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced Chop was also upregulated; however, neither endoplasmic reticulum nor mitochondrial unfolded protein response was activated. We conclude that only aripiprazole, but not olanzapine, protects liver cells against oxidative stress. This finding could be relevant for schizophrenia patients with high-oxidative-stress-risk lifestyles and needs to be validated in vivo.

Comparing the efficacy of aripiprazole as an add-on to valproate with other second-generation antipsychotics in acute mania symptoms in manic patients in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Given the great importance of treating patients with bipolar disorder, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of aripiprazole with other second-generation antipsychotics in relieving acute symptoms of mania. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 50 patients with bipolar I disorder, manic episode, were divided into two groups receiving aripiprazole (n = 25) and other second-generation antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine) (n = 25) for 6 weeks. The disease severity was evaluated and compared according to YMRS and CGI criteria. RESULTS: The mean severity of mania according to YMRS and CGI, at week 0 in comparison with weeks 2, 4 and 6 in both groups was significantly different (p < 0.0001) and the treatment with Aripiprazole at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and 4 (p = 0.0002) was significantly better than the other second-generation antipsychotics. The two groups also showed an overall improvement in CGI-based results at weeks 4 and 6 (p = 0.002). In addition, the efficacy index for aripiprazole at weeks 4 (p = 0.011) and 6 (p < 0.0001) as well as disease improvement in the second (p < 0.0001) and fourth (p = 0.026) weeks after treatment were better than the other second-generation antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole and other second-generation antipsychotics, 2 weeks after initiation of treatment, significantly reduced mania severity in patients with bipolar disorder, however, aripiprazole seems to be more efficient and faster for controlling mania in patients with bipolar disorder.KEY POINTSAripiprazole and other second-generation antipsychotics, 2 weeks after initiation of treatment, significantly reduced mania severity in patients with bipolar disorder.Comparison between the two drugs, aripiprazole showed a more beneficial role in the second and fourth weeks than second-generation antipsychotics.Due to the fact that the possible mechanisms involved in the role of aripiprazole have not been considered compared to other antipsychotics in patients with bipolar disorder, there is a need for more extensive studies in this field.

The relation between second-generation antipsychotics and laxative use in elderly patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate factors associated with concomitant laxative use among elderly patients with schizophrenia, discharged on second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), from two large public psychiatric hospitals in Taiwan. METHODS: Elderly patients with schizophrenia who were discharged between 2006 and 2019 and received SGA monotherapy at discharge were included in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with regular laxative use at discharge. The Cochrane-Armitage trend test was used to evaluate whether significant time trends existed for rates of laxative use at discharge. RESULTS: A total of 2591 elderly patients with schizophrenia were discharged during the study period, and 1727 of 2591 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included for analysis. Of these 1727 patients, 732 (42.4%) also received concomitant laxatives. Female gender, mood stabiliser use and concomitant diabetes mellitus were found to be associated with increased laxative use. Among SGAs, clozapine was associated with the highest rate of laxative use, followed by zotepine, quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone. Additionally, risperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole, paliperidone and sulpiride were associated with comparable rates of laxative use. Laxative use rates grew over time from 30.8% in 2006 to 46.6% in 2019 (z = 4.83, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laxative use is common in elderly schizophrenia patients treated with SGAs. In cases of clinically significant constipation, switching to an SGA with a lower risk for constipation, or discontinuing the use of mood stabilisers should be considered, if clinically feasible.

Second-generation antipsychotic use during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations.

PURPOSE: To study if second-generation antipsychotic (S-GA) use during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations (MCM). METHODS: A population-based birth cohort study using national register data extracted from the Drugs and Pregnancy database in Finland, years 1996-2017. The sampling frame included 1,273,987 pregnant women. We included singleton pregnancies ending in live or stillbirth or termination of pregnancy due to severe malformation. Pregnancies with exposure to known teratogens were excluded. Women were categorized into three groups: exposed to S-GAs (n = 3478), exposed to first-generation antipsychotics (F-GAs) (n = 1030), and unexposed (no purchases of S-GAs or F-GAs during pregnancy, n = 22,540). We excluded genetic conditions and compared the prevalence of MCMs in S-GA users to the two comparison groups using multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Use of S-GAs during early pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of overall MCMs compared to unexposed (adjusted odds ratio, OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.72-1.19) or to F-GA users (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.56-1.20). Of individual S-GAs, olanzapine use was associated with an increased risk of overall MCMs (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.19-3.76), and specifically, an increased risk of musculoskeletal malformations (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.35-10.1) when compared to unexposed, while comparisons to F-GA users did not show significant results. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine use is associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations and specifically, musculoskeletal malformations. Use during pregnancy should be restricted to situations where no safer alternatives exist.

Greater Arterial Stiffness in Children with or without Second-generation Antipsychotic Treatment for Mental Health Disorders: Rigidité Artérielle Plus Importante Chez Les Enfants Avec ou Sans Traitement Par Antipsychotiques de la Deuxième Génération Pour des Troubles de Santé Mentale.

OBJECTIVE: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are used for a variety of mental disorders and are associated with cardiometabolic side effects in children. The objective of this study was to assess the cardiovascular health of children with mental disorders that are SGA-treated or SGA-naive. METHODS: SGA-treated (n = 47) or SGA-naive (n = 37) children (aged 6 to 18 years) with mental disorders and control children (n = 83, no mental disorder) underwent assessment for cardiac function and morphology by echocardiography, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Body mass index (BMI) z-scores, waist circumference z-scores, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) percentiles for height and sex, and fasting plasma glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and cholesterol were also assessed. Differences between SGA-treated, SGA-naive, and control children were assessed by linear and log-linear regression models. RESULTS: SGA-treated children had greater BMI z-scores and overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age and sex) and hypertension than SGA-naive and control children. The PWV geometric mean was 11.1% higher in SGA-treated (95%CI, 3.95 to 18.77) and 12.9% higher in SGA-naive children (95% CI, 5.60 to 20.59) compared to controls in models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and systolic BP percentile. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension/body surface area (BSA), LV end-systolic dimension/BSA, and LV ejection fraction were lower in SGA-treated and SGA-naive children compared to controls in models adjusted for sex and age. CONCLUSIONS: Children with mental disorders have greater arterial stiffness and altered cardiac structure/function than children with no mental health diagnosis. SGA treatment in children is not associated with alterations in cardiovascular structure/function.

Long-Term Metabolic Monitoring of Youths Treated with Second-Generation Antipsychotics 5 Years after Publication of the CAMESA Guidelines Are We Making Progress? Surveillance Métabolique à Long Terme des Jeunes Traités par Antipsychotiques de Deuxième Génération, Cinq ans Après la publication des Lignes Directrices Camesa: Faisons-Nous des Progrès?

OBJECTIVE: The potential metabolic adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) need to be monitored. The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics (CAMESA) offers guidelines for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the long-term rates of youths receiving monitoring in mental health clinics and document the factors that may influence them. METHOD: The charts of 180 patients (13.3 ± 3.1 years, 54.4% males) receiving SGA treatment for the first time between January 2016 and June 2018 were reviewed. Monitoring was divided into baseline and 1- to 6-month and 9- to 24-month periods. Population under study was stratified into children (4 to 12 years) and adolescents (13 to 18 years). Sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnosis and comorbidities, prescribed SGAs and comedications, anthropometric measures (AM), blood pressure (BP), blood tests (BT), electrocardiogram, and the psychiatrist's years of practice were collected. Cross tables were used to present the monitoring rates. Categories were compared by covariate analysis. Rates of patients monitored across categories were compared using Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Monitoring rates for AM, BT, and BP were 55%, 47.8%, and 46.7% at baseline; 50%, 41.7%, and 45.2% at 1 to 6 months; and 47.2%, 41.5%, and 40.6% at 9 to 24 months, respectively. Higher monitoring rates were significantly associated with adolescent status (baseline, 1 to 6 months), a diagnosis of psychotic and/or affective disorder (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months), having ≤1 psychiatric comorbidities (1 to 6 months), high SGA dose (baseline, 1 to 6 months), and clinician's experience (baseline, 9 to 24 months). Significantly lower monitoring rates were associated with the psychostimulant/atomoxetine comedication (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months). CONCLUSION: Five years after publication of the CAMESA guidelines, metabolic monitoring is conducted for less than half of patients. In our sample, age, diagnostic category, psychiatric comorbidities, SGA dose, clinician's experience, and comedications influenced the monitoring rates. Major progress still needs to be made before reaching a satisfactory level of monitoring.

[Argentine consensus on the diagnosis and therapeutics of treatment resistant schizophrenia]. / Consenso argentino sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento de la esquizofrenia resistente al tratamiento.

Approximately 30% of people with schizophrenia fail to respond to first-line antipsychotic treatment which impacts the burden of the disease. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) denotes patients with failure to respond to at least two adequate trials of different antipsychotics. Clozapine is a unique drug approved for treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia, however 1/3 of patients fail to respond to clozapine. Even though different strategies have been proposed for treating clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, the evidence is very limited, unclear, and of poor quality. A formal literature search was conducted and then, panel members were asked to complete 35 questions addressing different aspects of TRS. A modified Delphi method was used to unify expert opinion and achieve consensus. The expert consensus in diagnostic and treatment of TRS is the result of experts from the main national scientific societies under the organization of the Argentine Association of Biological Psychiatric (AAPB). The consensus statement aims to guide on diagnosis and treatment.

Current and Novel Approaches to Mitigate Cardiometabolic Adverse Effects of Second-Generation Antipsychotics.

Second-generation antipsychotic-related weight gain and metabolic disturbances are a major public health issue given the widespread prescribing of these medications. The lack of clearly known mechanisms of cardiometabolic adverse effects and the relevance of cardiometabolic health for survival make this an important area for research. While nonpharmacologic and some pharmacologic treatments have shown benefits vs control conditions or placebo, the effects are modest and long-term benefits are less clear. Therefore, new approaches to mitigate second-generation antipsychotic-associated cardiometabolic burden are sorely needed.