RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Large population-based prospective studies are necessary to provide clarification on the associations of panoramic secondhand smoking burden, including prenatal and postnatal secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, with the risk of developing dementia. METHODS: Our study comprised a sample of 353,756 dementia-free individuals from the UK Biobank who were nonsmokers had data on the exposure of maternal smoking as well as SHS exposure in daily life, which was quantified in terms of hours per week (h/week) and whether they lived with household smokers. Multivariable Cox regression models were utilized to analyze the independent and joint associations of maternal smoking and daily life SHS exposure with dementia risk. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 11.8 years, 4,113 participants developed dementia. Compared with those who lived in the environment without smokers, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) were 1.11 (1.02, 1.20) and 1.31 (1.13, 1.52) for those who exposed to SHS for >0 but ≤4 h/week and >4 h/week, respectively, and was 1.25 (1.13, 1.39) for those who lived with smokers in the household. A positive history of maternal smoking was associated with a modestly higher risk of dementia (HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.15). Furthermore, compared with participants with neither history of maternal smoking nor exposure to SHS, a particularly higher risk of dementia was observed among those with both exposures (HR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.86). Additionally, the HR (95% CI) was 1.32 (1.10, 1.59) when comparing participants with a history of maternal smoking who lived with smokers in their households with those who had neither exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Having a history of maternal smoking, longer exposure to SHS, and living with smokers in the household were each associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. Individuals who were simultaneously exposed to maternal smoking and SHS or lived with household smokers had a particularly higher dementia risk.
Assuntos
Demência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/etiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Prospectivos , não Fumantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The harmful effects of first and secondhand smoking are well established. Smoke-free laws aim at protecting nonsmokers. This study aimed to assess the impact of the 2013 total ban on indoor smoking in Chile on hospitalizations and deaths of major cardiovascular events. METHODS: The logarithm of the monthly hospitalization and death rates, standardized by age for every 100,000 inhabitants, were estimated for ischemic heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, strokes, and a composite outcome of ischemic heart diseases (which includes acute myocardial infarction) and strokes. In addition, interrupted time series with synthetic control groups were used to assess changes in levels and trends after the intervention. RESULTS: The total ban on indoor smoking caused significant reductions in death rates for the three diseases studied for age groups above 20 years old. In addition, there were substantial decreases in the postintervention hospitalization rates for ischemic heart disease: for the 20-44 age group, the decrease was 8.7% compared to the pre-intervention period (p<0.01). In comparison, such a reduction was 4% (p<0.01) for the ≥65 age group. For acute myocardial infarction, the decrease was 11.5% (p<0.01) for the 20-44 age group, while for stroke, it was a 1.2% (p<0.01) decrease for the total population. It is estimated that the smoking ban averted 15.6% of the deaths compared with the synthetic control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of total smoke-free environments in Chile contributed to the reduction of mortality for main cardiovascular diseases. This study provides additional evidence of causality linking the policy to health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: The total indoor smoking ban significantly affected age-standardized hospitalization and deaths. The number of deaths averted by this policy is estimated at approximately 4,758 and 5,256 for IHD and stroke, respectively, during the 2013-2017 period (15.6% fewer deaths than predicted by the synthetic control groups). The study contributes to the body of evidence that supports total indoor smoking bans.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The impact of environmental chemical exposure on blood pressure (BP) is well-established. However, the relationship between secondhand smoke exposure (SHSE) and mortality in hypertensive patients in the general population remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cohort study included US adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2018. All-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality outcomes were determined by associating them with the National Death Index records. Cox proportional risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for SHSE. The cohort included 10,760 adult participants. The mean serum cotinine level was 0.024 ng/mL. During a mean follow-up period of 76.9 months, there were 1729 deaths, including 469 cardiovascular disease deaths recorded. After adjusting for lifestyle factors, BMI, hypertension duration, medication use, and chronic disease presence, the highest SHSE was significantly associated with higher all-cause and CVD mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that higher SHSE is significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality and CVD mortality. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Causas de Morte , Hipertensão , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão/mortalidade , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Cotinina/sangue , PrognósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this observational study was to assess the status of public place and workplace compliance with smoke-free provisions in Ethiopia. METHODS: This study was conducted in four regions of Ethiopia (Oromia; Sidama; Harari; and Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region) from September to October 2021. Data were collected using a standardised smoke-free checklist. Χ2 tests were used to assess the association between categorical variables and the smoke-free status. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the presence of at least one person actively smoking. RESULTS: Approximately 97% (95% CI 93.1%, 98.8%) of government buildings, 92.5% (95% CI 85.7%, 96.2%) of educational institutions, 89.8% (95% CI 86.3%, 92.5%) of bars, restaurants and cafés, 88.4% (95% CI 82.9%, 92.3%) of food establishments and 84.0% of hotels (95% CI 79.5%, 87.6%) were non-compliant with the tobacco control law. Overall, only 12.3% of sites met the requirements of the current smoke-free law. The multivariable logistic regression models showed that transit facilities (adjusted OR (AOR)=26.66 (95% CI 7.53, 94.41)) and being located in the Harari region (AOR=4.14 (95% CI 2.30, 7.45)) were strongly associated with the presence of active smoking observed during the site visit. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that public place and workplace non-compliance level was very high in all sites. This calls for more effective implementation of complete smoke-free provisions across all government buildings and institutions in all regions, such as public educational campaigns about the laws and enforcement action for non-compliance. Furthermore, all regional states should adopt Federal Proclamation 1112/2019.
Assuntos
Política Antifumo , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Etiópia , Local de Trabalho , Meio Ambiente , RestaurantesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) among individuals who do not smoke has declined in the USA, however, gaps remain in understanding how TSE patterns across indoor venues-including in homes, cars, workplaces, hospitality venues, and other areas-contribute to TSE disparities by income level. METHODS: We obtained data on adults (ages 18+, N=9909) and adolescents (ages 12-17, N=2065) who do not smoke from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2018. We examined the prevalence of self-reported, venue-specific TSE in each sample, stratified by poverty income ratio (PIR) quartile. We used linear regression models with a log-transformed outcome variable to explore associations between self-reported TSE and serum cotinine. We further explored the probability of detectable cotinine among individuals who reported no recent TSE, stratified by PIR. RESULTS: Self-reported TSE was highest in cars (prevalence=6.2% among adults, 14.2% among adolescents). TSE in own homes was the most strongly associated with differences in log cotinine levels (ß for adults=1.92, 95% CI=1.52 to 2.31; ß for adolescents=2.37 95% CI=2.07 to 2.66), and the association between home exposure and cotinine among adults was most pronounced in the lowest PIR quartile. There was an income gradient with regard to the probability of detectable cotinine among both adults and adolescents who did not report recent TSE. CONCLUSIONS: Homes and vehicles remain priority venues for addressing persistent TSE among individuals who do not smoke in the USA. TSE survey measures may have differential validity across population subgroups.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The WHO South-East Asia Region is home to around 33% of adult tobacco users. To inform tobacco control policy and practice, we conducted a study using the latest available data to update mortality attributable to overall tobacco use, including smoked tobacco, smokeless tobacco (SLT) and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, in the 11 countries of the Region. METHODS: We estimated smoking, SLT use and SHS exposure using the latest available surveys for each country during 2016-2021, and then estimated all-cause and lung cancer-attributable annual deaths for each using the population-attributable fraction method. Finally, we estimated the annual total tobacco-attributable deaths including all three exposures using the multiplicative aggregation method. RESULTS: We estimated the occurrence of 4 087 920 all-cause deaths and 105 279 lung cancer deaths annually attributable to tobacco use among the 11 countries investigated. India accounted for 63.9% of all-cause tobacco-attributable deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The high annual number of tobacco-attributable deaths in the Region highlights the need for accelerating progress in reducing tobacco use. Implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and MPOWER policy package needs prioritisation at the country level. Tobacco cessation services, supply-side measures and policies to counter tobacco industry interference should be strengthened. Further work is needed to monitor progress towards FCTC implementation and analyse the impacts of policies on tobacco-related outcomes, including attributable mortality and disease burden, to inform advocacy efforts.
RESUMO
Close associations among secondhand smoke (SHS) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components have been demonstrated, however sex differences in these associations remain unclear. We collected 121,364 participants from the Taiwan Biobank, and excluded those with smoking history, the remaining 88,297 participants (male: 18,595; female: 69,702; mean age 50.1 ± 11.0 years) were included. SHS exposure was evaluated based on self-reported questionnaires. SHS was associated with MetS (odds ratio [OR], 1.268, p < 0.001 for males vs. 1.180, p < 0.001 for females), abdominal obesity (OR, 1.234, p < 0.001 for males vs. 1.199, p < 0.001 for females), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 1.183, p = 0.008 for males vs. 1.094, p = 0.011 for females), hyperglycemia (OR, 1.286, p < 0.001 for males vs. 1.234, p < 0.001 for females), but not with hypertriglyceridemia. SHS was associated with high blood pressure (BP) (OR, 1.278, p < 0.001) only in males, but not in females. Furthermore, significant interactions were found between sex x SHS on MetS (p = 0.023), abdominal obesity (p = 0.032), and elevated BP (p < 0.001). Moreover, the participants who were exposed to SHS for ≥1 hour per week were associated with a higher risk (OR = 1.316, p = 0.001 in males vs. OR = 1.220, p < 0.001 in females) of MetS compared to those with no exposure. These results showed an association between SHS and a high OR for MetS in both the males and females. Furthermore, sex differences were identified in the associations between SHS and MetS and its components, and SHS was more closely related to MetS, abdominal obesity, and high BP in males than in females.
Assuntos
Síndrome Metabólica , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/etiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Sexuais , Seguimentos , Obesidade Abdominal/epidemiologia , Obesidade Abdominal/complicações , não Fumantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Perception of health risk can influence household rules, but little is known about how the perception of harm from cannabis secondhand smoke (cSHS) is related to having a complete ban on in-home cannabis smoking. We examined this association among a nationally representative sample of United States adults. METHODS: Respondents were 21,381 adults from the cross-sectional Marijuana Use and Environmental Survey recruited from December 2019-February 2020. Perceived harm of cSHS exposure (extremely harmful, somewhat harmful, mostly safe, or totally safe) and complete ban of cannabis smoking anywhere in the home (yes or no) were self-reported. Logistic regression for survey-weighted data estimated covariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between perceived harm of cSHS and complete ban on in-home cannabis smoking. Stratified subgroup analyses (by cannabis smoking status, cannabis use legalization in state of residence, and children under age 6 living in the home) were conducted to quantify effect measure modification of the association between perception of harm and complete ban. RESULTS: A complete ban on in-home cannabis smoking was reported by 71.8% of respondents. Eight percent reported cSHS as "totally safe"; 20.5% "mostly safe"; 38.3% "somewhat harmful"; and 33.0% "extremely harmful". Those who reported cSHS as "extremely harmful" had 6 times the odds of a complete ban on in-home cannabis smoking (OR = 6.0, 95%CI = 4.9-7.2) as those reporting smoking as "totally safe". The odds of a complete ban were higher among those reporting cSHS as "somewhat harmful" (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 2.2-3.1) or "mostly safe" (OR = 1.4, 95%CI = 1.2-1.7) vs those reporting cSHS as "totally safe". In each subgroup of cannabis smoking status, state cannabis use legalization, and children under the age of 6 living in the home, perceived harm was associated with a complete ban on in-home cannabis smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates perceiving cSHS as harmful is strongly associated with having a complete in-home cannabis smoking ban. With almost a third of US adults perceiving cSHS as at least "mostly safe", there is strong need to educate the general population about potential risks associated with cSHS exposure to raise awareness and encourage adoption of household rules prohibiting indoor cannabis smoking.
Assuntos
Cannabis , Fumar Maconha , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Habitação , PercepçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Smoking is a leading cause of premature mortality and morbidity globally. The pollutants generated from smoke are not only harmful to smokers, but also to those exposed to secondhand smoke. As a result of increasingly restrictive indoor smoke-free policies in many countries, there is a tendency for tobacco smoking to move outdoors into partially enclosed settings in hospitality venues. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of secondhand smoke on air quality in outdoor hospitality venues. METHODS: Two electronic databases PubMed and Scopus were searched from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2022 for studies of air quality impacts from tobacco smoking in outdoor hospitality venues. A total of 625 studies were screened and 13 studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The majority (9 studies) of reviewed studies monitored PM2.5 concentration as an indicator of secondhand smoke. PM2.5 was reported from 10.9 µg/m3 to 91.0 µg/m3 in outdoor smoking areas, compared to 4.0 µg/m3 to 20.4 µg/m3 in outdoor control sites unaffected by smoking. Secondhand smoke can also drift into adjacent outdoor areas or infiltrate into indoor environments thus affecting air quality in spaces where smoking is not permitted. CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed studies indicated that air quality within outdoor hospitality venues where smoking is permitted is unlikely to meet current World Health Organization (WHO) ambient air quality guidelines for PM2.5. Customers and staff in outdoor hospitality venues with active smoking, and in adjacent outdoor and indoor non-smoking areas, are potentially exposed to secondhand smoke at levels exceeding WHO guidelines. Stronger smoking control policies are recommended for outdoor hospitality venues to protect the health of customers and staff from harmful secondhand smoke exposure. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022342417.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Restaurantes , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/análise , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Poluição do Ar/análise , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento Ambiental , Política Antifumo , Material Particulado/análise , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
AIM: This study classified 99 countries into four income groups and then analysed the impact of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure at home, in public places and at school, on current cigarette smoking prevalence. METHODS: We utilised data from the WHO Global Youth Tobacco Survey and a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the prevalence and weighted odds ratios (wORs) of adolescent smoking behaviour and SHS exposure locations. RESULTS: Both smoking behaviours increased with higher national income levels. Smoking behaviours in high and upper-middle-income countries (HICs and UMICs) exhibited an association with SHS exposure in public places (HIC: wOR, 3.50 [95% CI, 2.85-4.31]; UMIC: wOR, 2.90 [2.60-3.23]) compared to home. Low- and lower-middle-income countries (LICs and LMICs) showed an association with SHS exposure in the home (LIC: wOR, 5.33 [3.59-7.93]; LMIC: wOR, 2.71 [2.33-3.17]) than public places. The association between current cigarette smoking and SHS exposure at home increased with lower income levels, while anticipated future use of any form of tobacco with SHS exposure in public places rose in lower income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions based on income levels are essential, emphasising home strategies in lower income countries and public place efforts in higher income countries.
Assuntos
Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Saúde Global , Feminino , Masculino , Fumar/epidemiologia , Comportamento do Adolescente , Prevalência , Países em DesenvolvimentoRESUMO
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance are major obstacles in the long-term efficacy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment. Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is common and has been proposed as an independent predictor of HNSCC recurrence and disease-free survival. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these negative patient outcomes are unknown. To assess the effects of SHS exposure on cisplatin efficacy in cancer cells, three distinct HNSCC cell lines were exposed to sidestream (SS) smoke, the main component of SHS, at concentrations mimicking the nicotine level seen in passive smokers' saliva and treated with cisplatin (0.01-100 µM) for 48 h. Compared to cisplatin treatment alone, cancer cells exposed to both cisplatin and SS smoke extract showed significantly lower cisplatin-induced cell death and higher cell viability, IC50, and indefinite survival capacity. However, SS smoke extract exposure alone did not change cancer cell viability, cell death, or cell proliferation compared to unexposed control cancer cells. Mechanistically, exposure to SS smoke extract significantly reduced the expression of cisplatin influx transporter CTR1, and increased the expression of multidrug-resistant proteins ABCG2 and ATP7A. Our study is the first to document that exposure to SHS can increase cisplatin resistance by altering the expression of several proteins involved in multidrug resistance, thus increasing the cells' capability to evade cisplatin-induced cell death. These findings emphasize the urgent need for clinicians to consider the potential role of SHS on treatment outcomes and to advise cancer patients and caregivers on the potential benefits of avoiding SHS exposure.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Morte CelularRESUMO
Smoke-free housing policies are intended to reduce the deleterious health effects of secondhand smoke exposure, but there is limited evidence regarding their health impacts. We examined associations between implementation of a federal smoke-free housing rule by the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) and pediatric Medicaid claims for asthma, lower respiratory tract infections, and upper respiratory tract infections in the early post-policy intervention period. We used geocoded address data to match children living in tax lots with NYCHA buildings (exposed to the policy) to children living in lots with other subsidized housing (unexposed to the policy). We constructed longitudinal difference-in-differences models to assess relative changes in monthly rates of claims between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019 (the policy was introduced on July 30, 2018). We also examined effect modification by baseline age group (≤2, 3-6, or 7-15 years). In New York City, introduction of a smoke-free policy was not associated with lower rates of Medicaid claims for any outcomes in the early postpolicy period. Exposure to the smoke-free policy was associated with slightly higher than expected rates of outpatient upper respiratory tract infection claims (incidence rate ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.08), a result most pronounced among children aged 3-6 years. Ongoing monitoring is essential to understanding long-term health impacts of smoke-free housing policies.
Assuntos
Política Antifumo , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Criança , Habitação , Habitação Popular , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Medicaid , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
Despite a dramatic reduction in the prevalence of commercial cigarette smoking in the United States, children are still commonly exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS), which is a cause of various pediatric health problems. Further, SHS exposure is patterned by race and class, exacting an inequitable toll on children from families with lesser social and economic advantage. In this issue of the Journal, Titus et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2023;192(1):25-33) use natural experiment evaluation methods (difference-in-differences) to test whether the recently implemented US Department of Housing and Urban Development policy that forbade smoking in and around New York City Housing Authority buildings affected child respiratory health. The results from their work remind us that policies do not always impact outcomes as we might expect. Given that policy is one of the most potent tools for population health promotion, this work underlines the need for epidemiologists to engage in policy evaluation at all stages of the policy life cycle, in order to discover comprehensive approaches to policy development and implementation that prioritize equity and address structural racism.
Assuntos
Política Antifumo , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Criança , Habitação Popular , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Promoção da Saúde , Métodos EpidemiológicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Secondhand smoke (SHS) poses a significant public health threat. Cancer survivors are at a greater risk of adverse health outcomes from SHS because of its association with poor prognosis and other downstream clinical events. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of US adults aged 20 years and older was analyzed from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2013 and 2020. Data on indoor SHS exposure were reported by 16,778 adults who were not currently smoking (1775 cancer survivors; 15,003 individuals without a cancer history). The weighted prevalence of SHS exposure was estimated and compared across sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify correlates of SHS exposure. RESULTS: Of the 1775 nonsmoking cancer survivors (mean age, 64.9 years; 57.0% female; 84.4% non-Hispanic Whites), 15.8% reported SHS exposure. No significant change in trends of SHS exposure was observed during the study period. The prevalence of SHS exposure was higher in cancer survivors who were younger, racial minorities, and had a household income below 130% of the federal poverty level. After adjustment for multiple correlates, age below 40 years, low income, smoking history, and diagnosis within 2 years were associated with SHS exposure. Cancer survivors were most likely to report that SHS exposure occurred at home or in a car. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SHS exposure among cancer survivors remained steady in the past decade. However, disparities exist in SHS exposure among cancer survivors across sociodemographic characteristics and smoking status. Smoking cessation programs should be promoted among caregivers and families of cancer survivors.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Pobreza , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
This study aims to evaluate the association between smoking exposure and human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical abnormalities among women living with HIV (WLWH). By conducting a systematic review of the current literature, we evaluated the association between current active smoking and/or exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and the risk of cervical HPV incidence, prevalence, and clearance, as well as high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (HGCIN) incidence, prevalence, progression, and regression among WLWH. We conducted the literature search in Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus following the PRISMA guidelines. We determined the risk of bias of included studies using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Studies with the same effect measure were combined for a pooled estimate. We identified 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis, with a limited number of studies evaluating each study question. Among WLWH, current active smoking is associated with an increased risk of new HPV infections (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.60), HPV prevalence (ORpooled = 1.55, 95% CI 1.26-1.91), HGCIN incidence (HR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0), and HGCIN prevalence (PR = 3.69, 95% CI 1.54-8.78). There was no significant association between current active smoking and HPV clearance. We did not identify any study that evaluated the association between SHS exposure and HPV-related cervical abnormalities among WLWH. Active smoking increases the risk of HPV infection and pre-cancer lesion development in WLWH. Considering smoking as an additional risk factor when designing tailored cervical cancer screening programs for WLWH is necessary in high smoking prevalence regions.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Prevalência , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologiaRESUMO
Cannabis use is increasing among adults with children in the home particularly in states with cannabis legalization for medical (MCL) and/or recreational use (RCL), relative to states where cannabis use remains illegal at the state level. Exposure to secondhand smoke is a key risk factor for asthma among children. The objective of the current study was to investigate the relationship between MCL and RCL and the state-level prevalence of asthma among children in the United States (US). This ecological study used data from the 2011to 2019 National Survey on Children's Health, a representative sample of the population of minor children in the US. Changes in the annual prevalence of pediatric asthma by RCL/MCL over time were estimated using difference-in-difference (DID) analysis. Overall, a statistically significant decrease of 1.1% in the prevalence of pediatric asthma was observed from 2011- 2012 to 2018-2019. Adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, overall reductions in asthma over time were generally greater in states in which cannabis use is fully illegal or with recent MCL adoption, but the rate of decline did not differ statistically by RCL/MCL status. Relative to 2011-2012 and to states where cannabis is fully illegal, the prevalence of asthma increased in states with RCL among youth 12-17 years old (2018-2019 DID = 2.56, p = .028) and among youth in some NH minoritized race/ethnicity groups (2016-2017 DID = 3.88, p = .013 and 2018-2019 DID = 4.45, p = .004). More research is needed to estimate the potential consequences of increased adult use of cannabis in the community for children's respiratory health.
Assuntos
Asma , Cannabis , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Criança , Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Asma/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Legislação de MedicamentosRESUMO
This randomized clinical trial examined whether financial-incentives increase smoking cessation among mothers of young children and potential impacts on child secondhand-smoke exposure (SHSe). 198 women-child dyads were enrolled and assigned to one of three treatment conditions: best practices (BP, N = 68), best practices plus financial incentives (BP + FI, N = 63), or best practices, financial incentives, and nicotine replacement therapy (BP + FI + NRT, N = 67). The trial was completed in Vermont, USA between June 2015 and October 2020. BP entailed staff referral to the state tobacco quitline; financial incentives entailed mothers earning vouchers exchangeable for retail items for 12 weeks contingent on biochemically-verified smoking abstinence; NRT involved mothers receiving 10 weeks of free transdermal nicotine and nicotine lozenges/gum. Baseline, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-week assessments were conducted. Primary outcomes were maternal 7-day point-prevalence abstinence and child SHSe through the 24-week assessment with the 48-week assessment exploratory. Results were analyzed using mixed model repeated measures for categorical data. Odds of maternal abstinence were greater among mothers in BP + FI and BP + FI + NRT compared to BP at the 6- and 12-week assessments (ORs ≥ 7.30; 95% CIs: 2.35-22.71); only abstinence in BP + FI remained greater than BP at the 24-week assessment (OR = 2.95; 95% CIs: 1.06-8.25). Abstinence did not differ significantly between treatment conditions at the 48-week assesssment. There was a significant effect of treatment condition (F[2109] = 3.64, P = .029) on SHSe with levels in BP and BP + FI significantly below BP + FI + NRT (ts[109] ≥ -2.30, Ps ≤ 0.023). Financial incentives for smoking abstinence are efficacious for increasing maternal cessation but that alone was insufficient for reducing child SHSe. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05740098.
Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Motivação , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , NicotinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to examine the relationship between secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure and severe headaches or migraine in never-smoking adults verified by serum cotinine. BACKGROUND: Current evidence about the association between self-reported SHS exposure and headaches or migraine is limited and contradictory. An important issue lies in the lack of actual SHS exposure assessment through biomarkers. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 4560 never-smoking adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2004. The SHS exposure was evaluated by measuring serum cotinine concentrations. The information regarding severe headaches or migraine was based on self-reporting. RESULTS: The overall prevalence rate of severe headaches or migraine was 20% (919/4560). After adjusting for relevant covariates, we found that heavy SHS exposure (serum cotinine at 1 to 10 ng/mL) was positively associated with severe headaches or migraine (OR: 2.02, 95% CI [1.19, 3.43]); however, no significant association was found between low SHS exposure (serum cotinine at 0.05 to 0.99 ng/mL) and severe headaches or migraine (OR: 1.15, 95% CI [0.91, 1.47]). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that the natural logarithm of serum cotinine had a linear relationship with severe headaches or migraine (p = 0.335 for nonlinearity). Stratified analysis indicated that individuals with a BMI of <25 (p < 0.001 for interaction) and sedentary activity (p = 0.016 for interaction) modified the relationship between SHS exposure and severe headaches and migraine. Even after altering the definition of SHS exposure, excluding drugs that might affect the metabolism of serum cotinine, and multiple imputation, our sensitivity analysis results remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that heavy SHS exposure (serum cotinine at 1 to 10 ng/mL) had a significant positive association with severe headaches or migraine in never-smoking adults. Prospective studies are necessary to verify this relationship in the future.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Adulto , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Cotinina/análise , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Cefaleia/etiologia , FumarRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy is linked to adverse birth outcomes, such as low birth weight and preterm birth. While questionnaires are commonly used to assess SHS exposure, their ability to capture true exposure can vary, making it difficult for researchers to harmonize SHS measures. This study aimed to compare self-reported SHS exposure with measurements of airborne SHS in personal samples of pregnant women. METHODS: SHS was measured on 48-hour integrated personal PM2.5 Teflon filters collected from 204 pregnant women, and self-reported SHS exposure measures were obtained via questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were calculated for airborne SHS measures, and analysis of variance tests assessed group differences in airborne SHS concentrations by self-reported SHS exposure. RESULTS: Participants were 81% Hispanic, with a mean (SD) age of 28.2 (6.0) years. Geometric mean (SD) personal airborne SHS concentrations were 0.14 (9.41) µg/m3. Participants reporting lower education have significantly higher airborne SHS exposure (p=0.015). Mean airborne SHS concentrations were greater in those reporting longer duration with windows open in the home. There was no association between airborne SHS and self-reported SHS exposure; however, asking about the number of smokers nearby in the 48-hour monitoring period was most correlated with measured airborne SHS (Two+ smokers: 0.30µg/m3 vs. One: 0.12µg/m3 and Zero: 0.15µg/m3; p=0.230). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported SHS exposure was not associated with measured airborne SHS in personal PM2.5 samples. This suggests exposure misclassification using SHS questionnaires and the need for harmonized and validated questions to characterize this exposure in health studies. IMPLICATIONS: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that measurement error is a major concern in pregnancy research, particularly in studies that rely on self-report questionnaires to measure secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. The study introduces an alternative method of SHS exposure assessment using objective optical measurements, which can help improve the accuracy of exposure assessment. The findings emphasize the importance of using harmonized and validated SHS questionnaires in pregnancy health research to avoid biased effect estimates. This study can inform future research, practice, and policy development to reduce SHS exposure and its adverse health effects.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While a wide range of predictors of postpartum smoking relapse have been suggested, population-based studies have rarely examined these factors exclusively among women who quit in early pregnancy. Furthermore, workplace secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure has never been examined. METHODS: We analyzed data from 10,466 pregnant women who participated in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. Age, education, parity, breastfeeding, postpartum depression, SHS exposure at home, and SHS exposure at work (not working, working without SHS exposure, working with SHS exposure) were evaluated as possible predictors. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations between these factors and smoking relapse by 1 year postpartum among women who quit in early pregnancy. Analyses stratified by SHS exposure at home were also conducted. RESULTS: About one-fourth of early-pregnancy quitters had relapsed into smoking by 1 year postpartum. Lower education, multiparity, not breastfeeding, postpartum depression, and SHS exposure at home were associated with increased risks of smoking relapse. Working with SHS exposure was associated with an increased risk of smoking relapse; the multivariate-adjusted odds ratios of working without SHS exposure and working with SHS exposure compared with not working were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.59) and 2.18 (95% CI, 1.37-3.46), respectively. The significant association of workplace SHS exposure was observed only among women without SHS exposure at home. CONCLUSION: SHS exposure at work, as well as education, multiparity, breastfeeding, postpartum depression, and SHS exposure at home were associated with postpartum smoking relapse among early-pregnancy quitters.