RESUMO
Seed systems research is central to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Improved varieties with promise for ending hunger, improving nutrition, and increasing livelihood security may be released, but how do they reach and benefit different types of farmers? Without widespread adoption the genetic gains achieved with improved crop varieties can never be actualized. Progress has been made toward demand responsive breeding, however the draft CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy fails to recognize the complexity of seed systems and thus presents a narrow vision for the future of seed systems research. This points to the lack of evidence-based dialogue between seed systems researchers and breeders. This perspective paper presents findings from an interdisciplinary group of more than 50 CGIAR scientists who used a suite of seed systems tools to identify four knowledge gaps and associated insights from work on the seed systems for vegetatively propagated crops (VPCs), focusing on bananas (especially cooking bananas and plantains), cassava, potato, sweetpotato, and yam. We discuss the implications for thinking about and intervening in seed systems using a combined biophysical and socioeconomic perspective and how this can contribute to increased varietal adoption and benefits to farmers. The tools merit wider use, not only for the seed systems of VPCs, but for the seed of crops facing similar adoption challenges. We argue for deeper collaboration between seed systems researchers, breeders and national seed system stakeholders to address these and other knowledge gaps and generate the evidence and innovations needed to break through the 40% adoption ceiling for modern varieties, and ensure good quality seed once the new varieties have been adopted. Without this, the achievements of breeders may remain stuck in the seed delivery pipeline.
RESUMO
In India, over the past 50 years, aquaculture practices of species such as those used for Clarias batrachus were developed without adequate regulatory oversight. In these situations, it is important to consider the influence that genetic factors can have on such vulnerable aquaculture species. Population genetic structure can be evaluated through the use of neutral molecular markers, and this can aid in predicting the risk of the demise of populations and for framing management strategies to conserve remaining populations. The study presented here reports on the genetic status of C. batrachus populations through the analysis of data collected using 22 microsatellite markers from seven natural and one hatchery population. The mean values for observed heterozygosity across loci within populations ranged from 0.242 to 0.485. Measures of genetic differentiation were low overall, with mean values for FST of 0.270, FIS of 0.113 and FIT of 0.353. An AMOVA analysis revealed that percentages of variation among and within populations were 27.16 and 6.86, respectively, and Bayesian clustering analyses showed a population subdivision consisting of five clusters with admixture of haplotypes from other populations leading to genetic bottleneck. We also examined how hatchery management factors leading to excessive exchanges of fish between river systems through could impact the structure of the C. batrachus populations. Overall, this study shows how the systematic use of molecular markers can facilitate the development of management policies for these populations and for the development of a comprehensive set of rules for hatcheries and aquaculture practices, including avoidance of excessive homozygosity by avoiding repeated use of feral broodstock and their interrogation.