Temporal trends with the Evolut family of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The Evolut self-expanding valve (SEV) systems (Medtronic), were designed to accommodate varying valve sizes and reduce paravalvular leak (PVL) while maintaining a low delivery profile. These systems have evolved between product generations, alongside valve deployment techniques changing over time. AIMS: This study aimed to examine whether these changes impacted clinical outcomes. METHODS: EPROMPT is a prospective, investigator-initiated, postmarketing registry of consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the Evolut PRO/PRO+ SEV system. A total of 300 patients were divided into three consecutive cohorts of 100 patients according to implantation date (January to October 2018, November 2018 to July 2020, and August 2020 to November 2021). Procedural and clinical outcomes over these time periods were compared. RESULTS: Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 device implantation success improved over time (70.0% vs. 78.0% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.01), with a similar trend for VARC-3 device success (94.7% vs. 81.7% vs. 96.8%, p < 0.001). PVL (all degrees) frequency was likewise reduced over time (31.0% vs. 17.0% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.04). Furthermore, a trend was noticed toward shorter procedure times and shorter length of stay. However, postprocedural pacemaker implantation rates did not significantly differ (15.2% vs. 21.1% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.43). CONCLUSION: During a 3-year period, we demonstrated better TAVR outcomes with newer SEV iterations, alongside changes in implantation techniques, which might result in better procedural and clinical outcomes. However, we did not see a significant change in peri-procedural pacemaker rates for SEV.

Three-year clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic disease: Comparison between self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves.

INTRODUCTION: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis is a complex anatomical scenario for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Favorable short-term clinical outcomes have been reported with TAVI in this setting, but long-term data are scarce. METHODS: We retrospectively included, in a single-center registry, patients with BAV stenosis who underwent TAVI before 2020. We compared patients treated with self-expanding valves (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valves (BEV). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and need for aortic valve (AV) reintervention at 3 years. Secondary endpoints included each component of the primary endpoint, cardiovascular mortality, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rate, mean gradient and ≥moderate paravalvular leak (PVL) rate. RESULTS: A total of 150 consecutive patients (SEV = 83, BEV = 67) were included. No significant differences were reported between SEV and BEV groups for the primary composite endpoint (SEV 35.9% vs. BEV 32%, p = 0.66), neither for clinical secondary endpoints (all-cause mortality SEV 28.1% vs. BEV 28%, p = 0.988; cardiovascular mortality SEV 14.1% vs. BEV 20%, p = 0.399; stroke SEV 12.5% vs. BEV 6%, p = 0.342; need for AV reintervention SEV 0% vs. BEV 0%; PPI SEV 28.1% vs. BEV 24%, p = 0.620). A lower mean gradient persisted up to 3 years in the SEV group (SEV 8.8 ± 3.8 mmHg vs. BEV 10.7 ± 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.063), while no significant difference was found in the rate of ≥ moderate PVL (SEV 3/30 vs. BEV 0/25, p = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center registry, we observed favorable 3-year clinical outcomes in nonselected BAV patients treated with different generation devices, without significant differences between patients receiving SEV or BEV.

Comparisons of noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) and conventional method for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding valve in pure aortic regurgitation (PAR).

BACKGROUND: As compared to treatment of aortic stenosis (AS), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the commercially available valves to treat pure aortic regurgitation (PAR) has a lower device success rate and higher complication rates. AIMS: The study compared the acute results between TAVR using a novel noncoronary sinus pivot implantation (NCPI) method and that using the conventional method, aiming to explore a more optimized and effective operation method for TAVR in PAR. METHODS: PAR patients who underwent TAVR with self-expanding valves in our center from September 2021 to September 2023 were enrolled were divided into the NCPI (group A, N = 16) and conventional method (group B, N = 39) groups. We analyzed the pre-operative evaluation parameters and procedural and postoperative data of the two subgroups. RESULTS: The total patients' mean age was 71.2 ± 8.7 years and most were male (61.8%), with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 3.4 ± 1.9%. The device success rate of groups A and B was 100% and 71.8%, respectively. In group B, 48.7% had major adverse cardiac events (MACE); 46.2% patients had permanent pacemaker implantation or valve in valve implantation. None had MACE in group A. The noncoronary sinus implantation depth in NCPI was -1.1 + 1.0 and 4.2 + 3.7 mm in groups A and B (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR with a self-expanding valve using the NCPI method had a higher procedure success rate and dramatically low complications than that using the conventional method in PAR patients.

Third-Generation Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve with Reverse Parachute Sealing Cuff in Patients with Aortic Valve Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Navitor (Abbott Inc, IL, USA) transcatheter heart valve is a novel third-generation self-expanding bioprosthesis with specific features to mitigate paravalvular regurgitation (PVR). Owing to its novelty, there is a paucity of data on its application in clinical practice. METHODS: Consecutive cohort analysis of the use of the Navitor system in an as-treated clinical setting at a quaternary heart hospital. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive non-clinical trial patients treated with Navitor were identified. All patients underwent a successful procedure. The mean age was 79.3 years (±SD 7.82), 56.67% (n=34) were female, and the mean STS score was 4.87 (±SD 5.70). At 30 days post-procedure, all patients were alive with no readmissions for heart failure. One patient had a major vascular complication (1.7%). Four patients (7.14% of patients without a pre-existing pacemaker) received a new permanent pacemaker. Two patients (3.4%) had a non-disabling stroke. PVR at 30 days was trivial or none in 75% of patients, and no patient had worse than mild PVR. CONCLUSIONS: The Navitor system in this as-treated cohort was associated with favourable clinical, haemodynamic, and safety outcomes.

Safety and feasibility of early discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with ACURATE Neo-the POLESTAR trial.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) serves a growing range of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). TAVI has evolved to a streamlined procedure minimizing length of hospital stay. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an early discharge (ED) strategy after TAVI. METHODS: We performed an international, multi-center, prospective observational single-arm study in AS patients undergoing TAVI with the ACURATE valve platform. Eligibility for ED was assessed prior to TAVI and based on prespecified selection criteria. Discharge ≤ 48 h was defined as ED. Primary Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3-defined 30-day safety and efficacy composite endpoints were landmarked at 48 h and compared between ED and non-ED groups. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were included. The median age was 82 [25th-75th percentile, 78-85] years and the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score was 2.2% [25th-75th percentile, 1.6-3.3]. ED and non-ED were achieved in 173 (69%) and 79 (31%) patients respectively. Monitoring for conduction disturbances was the principal reason for non-ED (33%). Overall, at 30 days, all-cause mortality was 1%, new permanent pacemaker rate was 4%, and valve- or procedure-related rehospitalization was 4%. There was no difference in the primary safety and efficacy endpoint between the ED and non-ED cohorts (OR 0.84 [25th-75th percentile, 0.31-2.26], p = 0.73, and OR 0.97 [25th-75th percentile, 0.46-2.06], p = 0.94). The need for rehospitalization was similarly low for ED and non-ED groups. CONCLUSION: Early discharge after TAVI with the ACURATE valve is safe and feasible in selected patients. Rhythm monitoring and extended clinical observation protracted hospital stay.

Mind the Gap in TAVR: Recognizing and Managing Misloaded Self-Expanding TAVR Devices.

Misloading during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is rare but can cause unpredictable valve release if unrecognized. We describe how to identify a misloaded ACURATE neo2 device, and 3 methods to solve this by using a modified technique of valve deployment, ipsilateral extraction, and contralateral valve externalization with extracorporeal valve release.

Clinical impact of multiple resheathing during transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Evolut self-expanding valves.

BACKGROUND: The possibility to resheath some transcatheter heart valves (THV) facilitates the optimization of self-expandable devices implantation. However, resheating manoeuvres (expecially when repeated) increase the interaction between the transcatheter prosthesis and the patient's tissues potentially causing side-effects. AIMS: To assess the clinical outcomes of resheathing at midterm follow-up with a focus on the safety of multiple resheathing. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with a self-expandable supra-annular THV between December 2018 and December 2022. Primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, neurological events, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and CV rehospitalizations. All clinical endpoints were assessed according to VARC-3 criteria. RESULTS: 469 TAVI procedures with self-expandable supra-annular THV were included in the study. The attempt to resheath and the resheath manoeuvres number was prospectively recorded into an electronic database. Resheating was attempted in 253 (53.9%) cases; 1, 2 and ≥ 3 resheathing were performed in respectively 122 (26.0%), 63 (13.4%) and 68 (14.5%) procedures. At a median follow-up of 640 days (interquartile range 340-1033 days), the incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ between 0 vs. ≥1 (22.7 vs. 26.1%, LogRank p = 0.584) and < 3 vs. ≥3 resheathing groups (24.2 vs. 26.5% LogRank p = 0.963). Furthermore, no significant differences in the primary endpoint were observed between 0, 1-2 and ≥ 3 resheathing (p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that resheathing of self-expandable THVs during TAVI did not result in worse clinical outcomes compared with no resheathing at mid-term follow-up. These results are independent from the number of resheathing, underling the safety of multiple resheathing in terms of peri-procedural and mid-term outcome. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In this retrospective observational study of 469 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis with self-expanding valves, we investigated the influence of resheathing on mid-term clinical outcomes. Specifically, we focused on the safety of multiple resheathing procedures. Our findings revealed no significant impact of resheathing on medium-term outcomes. The primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular mortality, neurological events, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular rehospitalizations, did not show statistically significant differences between no resheathing, single resheathing and multiple resheathing groups. Our study suggests that resheathing, even when performed multiple times, does not appear to significantly affect clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.

Impact of repositioning on brain injury following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve.

Repositionable self-expanding valves allow for repositioning during deployment to achieve optimal valve placement. However, the risk of brain injury associated with repositioning, as detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), is unknown. Consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with repositionable self-expanding valves and receiving DW-MRI before and within 7 days post-TAVR procedure were included. The primary outcomes were incidence, number, total volume, and volume per lesion of the cerebral ischemic lesion in DW-MRI after TAVR. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed the association between repositioning and bigger total lesion volume (> 1 cm3 or > 0.5 cm3). Negative binomial regressions were performed to explore the association between repositioning and number of lesions. A propensity score matching was performed to adjust the potential confounders. Moreover, inverse probability of treatment weighted regression model with nonstabilized weights was used as sensitivity analysis. Among 243 included patients, repositioning was performed in 116 (47.7%) patients. The incidence of overt stroke (1.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.927) and silent stroke (86.2% vs. 85.8%, p = 0.932) were comparable between two groups. However, the number of new lesions (5.0 [2.0-9.0] vs. 3.0 [2.0-6.0], p = 0.048), and total lesion volume (275.0 [90.0-947.5] mm3 vs. 180.0 [50.0-440.0] mm3, p = 0.022) were significantly higher in the repositioned group. Moreover, the proportion of patients with lesion size greater than 0.5 cm3 was higher in the repositioned group (37.9% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.007). The similar results were observed after propensity score matching. In both multivariate regression model and sensitivity analysis, the repositioning was the independent predictor of number of lesions and bigger total lesion volume after TAVR. The utilization of the repositioning feature may increase the number and volume of silent brain infarcts in DW-MRI in patients who underwent TAVR. (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Single Center Registry in Chinese Population [TORCH]; NCT02803294).

Balloon-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Self-Expanding Valve Failure: The Need for a Tailored Approach.

An 82-year-old patient experienced symptomatic intra-prosthetic aortic regurgitation 5 years after self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation. Redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement was initially considered at high risk of coronary obstruction. Using a systematic computed tomography-based approach planning a low implantation with a SAPIEN 3 Ultra THV, we effectively mitigated risks.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Third-Generation Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Valves: A Meta-analysis.

Background: The choice of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prosthesis is crucial in optimizing short- and long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of third-generation balloon-expandable valves (BEV) vs self-expanding valves (SEV). Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for studies comparing third-generation BEV vs SEV. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical and hemodynamic end points. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). Results: The meta-analysis included 16 studies and 10,174 patients (BEV, 5753 and SEV, 4421). There were no significant differences in 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.48) between third-generation BEV vs SEV. TAVR with third generation BEV was associated with a significantly lower risk of TIA/stroke (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87), permanent pacemaker implantation (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.70), and ≥moderate paravalvular leak (PVL, OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75), and higher risk of ≥moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.33-6.05), higher mean gradient (WMD, 4.35; 95% CI, 3.63-5.08), and smaller effective orifice area (WMD, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.23), compared with SEV. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, TAVR with third-generation BEV vs SEV was associated with similar all-cause mortality, lower risk of TIA/stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation, and ≥moderate PVL, but higher risk of ≥moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch, higher mean gradient, and smaller effective orifice area. Large, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of TAVR with latest generations of BEV vs SEV.

Computational study of transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on patient-specific models-rapid surgical planning for self-expanding valves.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive interventional solution for treating aortic stenosis. The complex post-TAVR complications are associated with the type of valve implanted and the position of the implantation. The study aimed to establish a rapid numerical research method for TAVR to assess the performance differences of self-expanding valves released at various positions. It also aimed to calculate the risks of postoperative paravalvular leak and atrioventricular conduction block, comparing these risks to clinical outcomes to verify the method's effectiveness and accuracy. Based on medical images, six cases were established, including the aortic wall, native valve and calcification; one with a bicuspid aortic valve and five with tricuspid aortic valves. The parameters for the stent materials used by the patients were customized. High strain in the contact area between the stent and the valve annulus may lead to atrioventricular conduction block. Postoperatively, the self-expanding valve maintained a circular cross-section, reducing the risk of paravalvular leak and demonstrating favorable hemodynamic characteristics, consistent with clinical observations. The outcomes of the six simulations showed no significant difference in valve frame morphology or paravalvular leak risk compared to clinical results, thereby validating the numerical simulation process proposed for quickly selecting valve models and optimal release positions, aiding in TAVR preoperative planning based on patients'geometric characteristics.

Self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves in low risk TAVR patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized studies have broadened the indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to also include low-surgical-risk patients. However, the data on self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) valves in low-risk patients remain sparse. METHODS: The current study is a post hoc analysis of combined data from both LRT 1.0 and 2.0 trials comparing BE and SE transcatheter heart valves. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients received a BE valve, and 102 patients received an SE valve. The 30-day clinical outcomes were similar across both groups except for stroke (4.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.014) and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.8% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), which were higher in the SE cohort than the BE cohort. No difference was observed in terms of paravalvular leak (≥moderate) between the groups (0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.577). SE patients had higher aortic valve area (1.92 ± 0.43 mm2 vs. 1.69 ± 0.45 mm2, p < 0.001) and lower mean gradient (8.93 ± 3.53 mmHg vs. 13.41 ± 4.73 mmHg, p < 0.001) than BE patients. In addition, the rate of subclinical leaflet thrombosis was significantly lower in SE patients (5.6% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: In this non-randomized study assessing SE and BE valves in low-risk TAVR patients, SE valves are associated with better hemodynamics and lesser leaflet thrombosis, with increased rates of stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days; however, this could be due to certain patient-dependent factors not fully evaluated in this study. The long-term implications of these outcomes on structural valve durability remain to be further investigated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: LRT 1.0: NCT02628899 LRT 2.0: NCT03557242.