Dynamics of Cutibacterium repopulation onto the skin surface of the shoulder after chlorhexidine application.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to characterize the temporal dynamics of Cutibacterium repopulation of the skin surface after application of chlorhexidine to the shoulder. METHODS: Ten shoulders in five male subjects were used. A skin swab was taken prior to (0 minutes) and then at three, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol. Semi-quantitative bacterial load was measured for each timepoint. RESULTS: From zero minutes (pre-treatment) to three minutes, chlorhexidine-isopropyl alcohol reduced the skin bacterial load in eight out of ten shoulders. Of these eight shoulders, four (50%) had growth by 30 minutes, seven (88%) had growth by 60 minutes, and all eight (100%) had growth by 240 minutes. Compared to the three minutes after chlorhexidine application, bacterial load had significantly increased by 60 minutes but were still significantly lower than the pre-prep bacterial load (0 minutes). CONCLUSION: Following standard surgical skin preparation with chlorhexidine-isopropyl alcohol, the surface of the shoulder is repopulated with Cutibacterium within one hour, presumably from reservoirs in sebaceous glands not penetrated by topical antiseptic agents. Since these dermal glands are transected by skin incision for shoulder arthroplasty, this study suggests that they may be sources of wound contamination during surgery in spite of skin preparation with chlorhexidine.

Cutibacterium subtype distribution on the skin of primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: The skin of healthy shoulders is known to harbor multiple different subtypes of Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium) acnes at the same time. C acnes can often be isolated from deep tissue and explant samples obtained during revision of a failed shoulder arthroplasty, presumably because the shoulder was inoculated with organisms from the patient's skin at the time of the index arthroplasty. It is possible that specific subtypes or distributions of subtypes may be associated with an increased pathogenic potential and that the skin of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty contains different distributions of the subtypes than in patients undergoing primary arthroplasty. We analyzed the subtype distribution of Cutibacterium from the skin of shoulders undergoing revision arthroplasty vs. primary arthroplasty. METHODS: Preoperative skin swabs were collected from 25 patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty and 27 patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty. The results of semiquantitative cultures of the skin and deep tissues were reported as specimen Cutibacterium values, and scores from all deep tissue samples were added to report the total shoulder Cutibacterium score. Single-locus sequence typing (SLST) of C acnes from the skin swabs was used to determine the subtype distribution for each patient. The percentage of each subtype for each patient was averaged in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty and then compared with that in patients undergoing primary arthroplasty. RESULTS: The C acnes subtype distribution on the skin of revision arthroplasty patients was different from that of primary shoulder arthroplasty patients, with a significantly higher percentage of SLST subtype A (36.9% vs. 16.0%, P = .0018). The distribution of SLST subtypes was similar between revision arthroplasty patients with strongly positive culture findings vs. those with weakly positive or negative culture findings. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in the skin Cutibacterium subtype distributions were found between shoulders undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty and those undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. Future studies are needed to determine whether certain Cutibacterium subtype distributions are associated with an increased risk of arthroplasty revision.