Single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: techniques and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical techniques and to analyse the outcomes of single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) procedure for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried to identify studies reporting on the technical aspects and outcomes of SP RASP. Different combinations of keywords were used, according to a free-text protocol, to identify retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) describing surgical techniques for SP RASP and the associated surgical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: The transvesical approach represents the most common approach for SP RASP. A decrease in terms of estimated blood loss was observed when SP RASP was compared to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) and multi-port (MP) RASP. Furthermore, this technique allowed for a shorter length of hospital stay (LoS) and a lower post-operative complication rate, compared to OSP. Post-operative subjective and objective functional outcomes are satisfying and comparable to OSP and MP RASP. CONCLUSION: SP RASP represents a safe and feasible approach for the surgical management of BPH. It provides comparable surgical and functional outcomes to MP RASP, enabling for minimal invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and potential for improving patient care.

Comparing prostatic artery embolization to surgical and minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To summarize current evidence to report a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open simple prostatectomy (OSP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies published from inception until August 2021. The search terms used were (prostate embolization OR prostatic embolization) AND (prostatic hyperplasia OR prostatic obstruction) as well as the abbreviations of PAE and BPH. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4. RESULTS: Seven studies were included with 810 patients: five RCTs and one observational study compared PAE with TURP, and one observational study compared PAE with OSP. The included studies had considerable risk of bias concerns. TURP and OSP were associated with more statistically significant improvements in urodynamic measures and BPH symptoms compared to PAE. However, PAE seems to significantly improve erectile dysfunction compared to OSP and improve other outcome measures compared to TURP, although not significantly. PAE appeared to reduce adverse events and report more minor complications compared with TURP and OSP, but it is unclear whether PAE is more effective in the long-term. CONCLUSION: PAE is an emerging treatment option for patients with symptomatic BPH who cannot undergo surgery or have undergone failed medical therapy. Overall, PAE groups reported fewer adverse events. Future ongoing and longer-term studies are needed to provide better insight into the benefit of PAE compared to other treatment options.

Pre-and Post-Prostatectomy Detrusor Wall Thickness and the Symptom Profile in Patients with Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Prospective Review.

INTRODUCTION: The urinary bladder undergoes morphological and functional changes in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). These detrusor changes reflect chronically increased intravesical pressure as a result of outlet obstruction. This study aims to determine the relationship between the Pre- and Post-op detrusor wall thickness (DWT), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and duration of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who had open simple prostatectomy (OSP). METHOD: This was a prospective study of a cohort of patients who had OSP for symptomatic BPE. The IPSS and symptom duration for each patient were noted. Each patient also had an abdominal ultrasound scan with a measurement of their DWT. Retropubic OSP was done for each patient. The detrusor wall thickness was also measured 12 weeks after the prostatectomy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed the study; the mean age was 66.37 ± 8.09 years. The median pre-operative IPSS was 28 (IQR = 13.75), and the median duration of symptoms was 24 months (IQR = 37 months). The mean pre-operative DWT was 4.41 ± 1.38mm, while the mean post-operative DWT was 2.16 ± 0.98mm. The preoperative IPSS (p = 0.833) and duration of symptoms (p = 0.375) did not significantly correlate with the pre-operative DWT. There was a significant reduction in the mean DWT (p < 0.001) and IPSS (p < 0.001) following prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: DWT appears not to be significantly influenced by the severity or duration of LUTS. However, it reduced significantly following OSP with corresponding improvement in urinary symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: La vessie subit des changements morphologiques et fonctionnels chez les patients présentant une hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate (HBP) symptomatique. Ces modifications du détrusor reflètent une pression intravésicale chroniquement augmentée en raison de l'obstruction de la sortie. Cette étude vise à déterminer la relation entre l'épaisseur de la paroi du détrusor (EPD) avant et après l'opération, le score international des symptômes prostatiques (IPSS) et la durée des symptômes des voies urinaires inférieures (LUTS) chez les patients ayant subi une prostatectomie simple ouverte (OSP). MÉTHODE: Il s'agissait d'une étude prospective d'une cohorte de patients ayant subi une OSP pour une HBP symptomatique. L'IPSS et la durée des symptômes pour chaque patient ont été notés. Chaque patient a également subi une échographie abdominale avec mesure de leur EPD. Une OSP rétropubienne a été réalisée pour chaque patient. L'épaisseur de la paroi du détrusor a également été mesurée 12 semaines après la prostatectomie. RÉSULTATS: Cinquante-deux patients ont terminé l'étude ; l'âge moyen était de 66,37 ± 8,09 ans. L'IPSS médian préopératoire était de 28 (IQR = 13,75), et la durée médiane des symptômes était de 24 mois (IQR = 37 mois). L'EPD moyenne préopératoire était de 4,41 ± 1,38 mm, tandis que l'EPD moyenne postopératoire était de 2,16 ± 0,98 mm. L'IPSS préopératoire (p = 0,833) et la durée des symptômes (p = 0,375) n'ont pas significativement corrélé avec l'EPD préopératoire. Il y a eu une réduction significative de l'EPD moyenne (p < 0,001) et de l'IPSS (p < 0,001) après la prostatectomie. CONCLUSION: L'EPD ne semble pas être significativement influencée par la gravité ou la durée des LUTS. Cependant, elle a considérablement diminué après l'OSP avec une amélioration correspondante des symptômes urinaires. MOTS-CLÉS: Hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate, Épaisseur de la paroi du détrusor, Score international des symptômes prostatiques, Prostatectomie simple ouverte.

Laparoscopic prostatectomy with complete urethral reconstruction for sexual active BPH patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique of transvesical laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) plus complete urethral reconstruction(CUR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May 2019 to May 2021, 28 BPH patients with prostate volumes > 80 ml and the requirement to preserve the ejaculatory function (EF) received LSP plus CUR. Baseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative and postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. Data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The median prostate volume was 106 ml. All patients successfully underwent LSP with no intraoperative complications or conversions to open surgery. The median operative time was 146 min. A total of five Clavien-Dindo Grade1-2 postoperative complications were noted, including infection, prolonged urine leakage and cardiac arrhythmia. No patient reported postoperative urgent or stress urinary incontinence. Functional outcomes at one-year follow-up demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with median IPSS and Qmax (p both < 0.001). Compared with baseline, no significant difference was observed in IIEF and MSHQ-EjD-SF at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support transperitoneal-transvesical LSP plus CUR as a safe and effective surgical technique for treating BPH with large prostate adenoma, regardless of the volume of the median lobe, especially for patients requiring to preserve antegrade ejaculation.

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of large prostatic adenomas: surgical technique and outcomes from a high-volume robotic centre.

PURPOSE: Aim of the present study is to describe our robot-assisted simple prostatectomy technique and to report 6-month surgical and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Eighty men were consecutively submitted to robot-assisted simple prostatectomy in our institution from October 2019 to October 2020. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team. Diagnostic preoperative assessment was based on history, symptoms evaluation by International Prostate Symptom Score, digital rectal examination, flowmetry with post-void residual volume measurement by abdominal ultrasound, prostatic volume estimation by MRI, PSA dosage. Under combined general and subarachnoid anesthesia, surgery was performed via a transperitoneal approach using a Da Vinci Si system in the four-arm configuration. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, catheterization time, intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed. Clinical postoperative 6 months of evaluation was based on physical examination, flowmetry with post-void residual volume measurement, PSA dosage, and International Prostate Symptom Score. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 105.29 min, mean hospital staying 5.4 days. Blood loss was low in all cases and only 2 patients received transfusion. Catheterization time was 7 days. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, only minor (grade I and grade II) intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed. At 6-month postoperative assessment, a statistically significant increase of urinary flow indexes and bladder capacity was recorded, as a significant reduction of urinary residual volume. No patient experienced stress urinary incontinence and the mean postoperative IPSS score was significantly reduced to 4.3. Two patients were diagnosed with incidental prostatic cancer at the histopathological examination. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected in our experience on a large cohort confirm efficacy and safety of Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy. This procedure allows both short operative time and hospital staying, with low incidence of perioperative complications. This surgical technique can therefore be considered a valid alternative to other procedures for the surgical treatment of large volume prostates. Randomized prospective and comparative studies are warranted in the future to assess if different RASP techniques provide similar surgical and functional outcomes.

Anterior fibromuscular stroma-preserved endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a precision anatomical approach.

BACKGROUND: Benign prostate obstruction (BOO) is becoming increasingly important in this aging society. Some urge/stress urinary incontinence (UUI/SUI) still occurs after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP). It remains unclear how post-EEP incontinence can be avoided. Currently, early apical release to ameliorate the traction of the external sphincter is the best technique for incontinence prevention. OBJECTIVE: To describe our surgical technique of anterior fibromuscular stroma (AFS)-preserved EEP for BOO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The medical records of 60 consecutive patients who underwent AFS-preserved EEP for BOO in our center from September 2019 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: AFS-preserved EEP starts at the 12 o'clock position of the urethra, and the junction between the AFS and transitional zone (T-zone) was identified. The AFS and T-zone were separated first to protect the AFS in the initial operative procedure. Then, following the usual enucleation procedure, AFS-preserved EEP could be achieved. MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), testosterone, urethral stricture, and voiding status, such as incontinence, uroflow, and postvoiding residual urine were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The data show that AFS-preserved EEP could achieve similar surgical outcomes as other early apical release approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The preserved AFS provides a nice landmark at the 12 o'clock position during EEP.

Perioperative Outcome of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate versus Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare clinical safety and efficiency of Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for the treatment of large gland benign prostatic hyperplasia in a tertiary care center. METHODS: Perioperative data of 39 patients who underwent RASP in our institution from 2015 to 2021 was collected. Propensity score matching using prostate volume, patient age, and body mass index (BMI) was performed from a database of 1,100 Patients treated by ThuLEP from 2009 to 2021. A total of 76 patients were matched. Preoperative parameters such as BMI, age, and prostate volume, as well as intra- and postoperative parameters such as operation time, resection weight, transfusion rate, postoperative catheterization time, length of hospital stay (LoS), hemoglobin drop, postoperative urinary retention (PUR), Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC), and the Combined Complication Index (CCI), were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean hemoglobin drop (2.2 vs. 1.9 g/dL, p = 0.34), yet endoscopic surgery showed superiority in mean operation time (109 vs. 154 min, p < 0.001), mean postoperative catheterization time (3.3 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.001), and mean LOS (5.4 vs. 8.4 days, p < 0.001). Complication rates evaluated by CDC (p = 0.11) and CCI (p = 0.89) were similar in both groups. Within the documented complications, transfusion rate (0 vs. 3, p = 0.08) and the occurrence of PUR (1 vs. 2, p = 0.5) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: ThuLEP and RASP show similar perioperative efficacy and a low rate of complications. ThuLEP had shorter operation times, shorter catheterization time, and a shorter LoS.

Effect of Perioperative Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss following Open Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Review in Nigerian Men.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhage is a common complication following open simple prostatectomy and patients may sometimes require a blood transfusion. Tranexamic acid has been shown to reduce blood loss following transurethral resection of the prostate and open radical prostatectomy. This study evaluated the effect of perioperative intravenous administration of tranexamic acid on blood loss and blood transfusion rates in patients who had OSP for benign prostatic enlargement. METHODOLOGY: This was a comparative study of patients with documented prostate glands 60g and above scheduled for OSP. Initial hematocrit was done a day before surgery. The patients were randomized into a tranexamic acid group, which received perioperative intravenous tranexamic acid and the no-TXA group which received placebo (0.9% saline). All patients had open simple retropubic prostatectomy. Final post-operative hematocrit was assessed 72 hours after surgery, and blood loss was calculated using the modified Gross formula (actual blood loss = estimated blood volume x change in hematocrit / mean hematocrit). The transfusion rate was documented. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients participated in this study and were randomized into a tranexamic acid group and no-tranexamic acid group. The mean age of patients in the tranexamic acid group was 66.07 ±7.08 years and was comparable to the no- tranexamic acid group which was 66.50 ± 8.80 years (P = 0.842). The median total blood loss was lower in the tranexamic acid group (502mls, IQR 613) compared to the no-tranexamic acid group (801mls, IQR 1069). The difference in the median blood loss between the two groups was 299mls (U 275, P 0.055). The rate of blood transfusion was lower in the tranexamic acid group (6 patients, 21%) compared to the no tranexamic acid group (11 patients, 39%), (P = 0.146). There was no difference in complication rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing open simple prostatectomy showed a trend towards reduced intraoperative blood loss and less need no tranexamic for blood transfusion. This is of clinical significance, especially in elderly patients with low cardiovascular reserve.

CONTEXTE: L'hémorragie est une complication courante après une prostatectomie simple ouverte et les patients doivent parfois recevoir une transfusion sanguine. Il a été démontré que l'acide tranexamique réduit la perte de sang après une résection transurétrale de la prostate et une prostatectomie radicale ouverte. Cette étude a évalué l'effet de l'administration intraveineuse périopératoire d'acide tranexamique sur les pertes sanguines et les taux de transfusion sanguine chez des patients ayant subi une PSO pour hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s'agissait d'une étude comparative de patients dont la prostate de 60 g et plus était documentée et qui devaient subir une PSO. L'hématocrite de base a été effectué un jour avant la chirurgie. Les patients ont été répartis aléatoirement dans le groupe acide tranexamique, qui a reçu de l'acide tranexamique periopératoire par voie intraveineuse, et dans le groupe sans TXA, qui a reçu un placebo. Tous les patients ont subi une prostatectomie rétropubienne simple ouverte. L'hématocrite postopératoire a été évalué, et la perte de sang calculée à l'aide de la formule de Gross modifiée. Le taux de transfusion a été documenté. RÉSULTATS: Cinquante-six patients ont participé à cette étude et ont été randomisés entre le groupe avec acide tranexamique et le groupe sans acide tranexamique. L'âge moyen des patients du groupe acide tranexamique était de 66,07 ±7,08 ans et était comparable à celui du groupe sans acide tranexamique qui était de 66,50 ± 8,80 ans (P =0,842). La perte sanguine totale médiane était plus faible dans le groupe avec acide tranexamique (502 ml, IQR 613) que dans le groupe sans acide tranexamique (801 ml, IQR 1069). La différence de la perte de sang médiane entre les deux groupes était de 299 ml (U 275, P 0,055). Le taux de transfusion sanguine était inférieur dans le groupe acide tranexamique (6 patients, 21%) par rapport au groupe sans acide tranexamique (11 patients, 39%), (P =0,146). Il n'y avait pas de différence dans les taux de complication entre les deux groupes. CONCLUSION: L'utilisation de l'acide tranexamique chez les patients subissant une prostatectomie simple ouverte a montré une tendance à la réduction de la perte de sang peropératoire et un besoin moindre de transfusion sanguine. Mots clés: Hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate, Prostatectomie simple ouverte, Hémorragie, Acide tranexamique.

Mortality after surgery for benign prostate hyperplasia: a nationwide cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate postoperative mortality rates and risk factors for mortality after surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: All patients who underwent partial prostate excision/resection from 2004 to 2014 in Finland were retrospectively assessed for eligibility using a nationwide registry. Procedures were classified as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), laser vaporization of the prostate (laser), and open prostatectomy. Univariable and multivariable regression were used to analyze the association of age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), operation type, annual center operation volume, study era, atrial fibrillation, and prostate cancer diagnosis with 90 days postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Among the 39,320 patients, TURP was the most common operation type for lower urinary tract symptoms in all age groups. The overall 90 days postoperative mortality was 1.10%. Excess mortality in the 90 days postoperative period was less than 0.5% in all age groups. Postoperative mortality after laser operations was 0.59% and 1.16% after TURP (p = 0.035). Older age, CCI score, and atrial fibrillation were identified as risk factors for postoperative mortality. Prostate cancer diagnosis and the center's annual operation volume were not significantly associated with mortality. The most common underlying causes of death were malignancy (35.5%) and cardiac disease (30.9%). CONCLUSION: Elective urologic procedures for BPH are generally considered safe, but mortality increases with age. Laser operations may be associated with lower mortality rates than the gold standard TURP. Thus, operative risks and benefits must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. Further studies comparing operation types are needed.

Robotic versus open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands: single-centre study.

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a recently described surgical approach, but comparison with open simple prostatectomy (OSP) lack in the literature. We compared perioperative outcomes of OSP versus RASP. METHODS: Patients who underwent simple prostatectomy between 2017 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. OSP was performed by the transvesical technique and RASP was performed with a DaVinci Xi robot, using the transvesical extraperitoneal approach. Perioperative and postoperative data were compared and complications risk factors for complications were identified. RESULTS: and limitations. Overall, 103 patients were included (median age 72 years [IQR = 67-76]). Forty-seven underwent RASP and 56 OSP. The median volume of the prostate gland was 130 mL [IQR = 100-180] in the RASP group and 126 mL [IQR = 100-160] in the OSP group. RASP was associated with a significant reduction in blood loss (median 200 vs. 400 mL; p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (5 vs. 10 days; p < 0.001) and median catheterisation time (4 vs. 9 days; p < 0.001). In the RASP group, there were fewer grade ≥ 2 complications (2 (4.3%) vs. 13 (23.2%); p = 0.005) and less need for transfusions (0 vs. 6 (11%), p = 0.005). Preoperative prostate volume was a risk factor for complications (OR = 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.5]; p = 0.01) while robot-assisted surgery was a protective factor (OR 0.3 [95% CI 0.05-0.9]; p = 0.05). Functional outcomes between the two groups were identical at 12 months follow up. CONCLUSION: RASP is a safe and effective procedure. When compared with OSP, RASP was associated with decreased morbidity as well as reduced hospital stay and catheterisation time. Functional outcomes were comparable to the open approach.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative urinary incontinence after various prostate enucleation procedures: systemic review and meta-analysis of PubMed literature from 2000 to 2021.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) after various prostate enucleation procedures (PEP). METHODS: PubMed was searched from January 2000 to July 2021 for studies investigating UI after PEP. The articles were divided into 5 subgroups: holmium, thulium, greenlight laser, electrocautery, and simple prostatectomy. Meta-analysis was performed to examine rate of stress (SUI), urge (UUI) or unspecified UI at short (< 3 months), intermediate (3-6 months), and long-term (> 6 months). The impact of age, prostate size, surgery time, laser time, postoperative nadir PSA level and technical modifications on UI was analyzed. RESULTS: Most (69.4%) of 49 articles included employed holmium laser. There was no significant difference in incidence of short-, intermediate-, and long-term UI, SUI and UUI between five sub-groups and within different technical modifications. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of UI was higher (15%) at short-term with green-light and simple prostatectomy (95% CI 9-23 and 1-84), and higher (4%) at intermediate-term with holmium laser (95% CI 2-8). SUI was more prevalent at short-term with holmium laser (4%; 95% CI 2-5%), and at intermediate term with simple prostatectomy (3%; 95% CI 1-14). UUI was higher in the thulium group (10%, 95% CI 7-16). Increased age, surgery time, laser time and prostate size up to 80 cc were associated with higher UI. There was no correlation between postoperative PSA and UI. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in incidence of UI, SUI and UUI after various PEP. Patients age, prostate size, surgery and laser time are linearly associated with UI.

Are all procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia created equal? A systematic review on post-procedural PSA dynamics and its correlation with relief of bladder outlet obstruction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and provide a comprehensive literature review of Prostate specific antigen (PSA) dynamics after various surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A thorough PubMed database search was performed over last 30 years including terms "PSA" and various surgical procedures for BPH. PSA nadir after various procedure was evaluated. The post-operative improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum void rates and post-void residue after surgeries were recorded. An indirect correlation was made between PSA nadir and outcome of various BPH surgical procedures. RESULTS: Enucleation procedures like simple prostatectomy and endoscopic enucleation of prostate (EEP) produced maximum drop in PSA level after surgery and were associated with the highest improvement in post-operative parameters. The PSA nadir following resection techniques like transurethral resection of prostate and Holmium laser resection of prostate and vaporization technique was variable and less robust when compared to EEP. Newer techniques like Aquablation, Rezum, Urolift, Prostate artery embolization and Temporary implantable nitinol devices (iTIND) produce relatively less reduction in PSA and lesser percentile improvement in post-operative parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Various surgical procedures for BPH result in varying PSA nadirs level. Enucleation procedures and simple prostatectomy produce the most drastic and sustained decrease in PSA. There is a possible indirect evidence suggesting that the level of PSA nadir corresponds closely with the degree of post-operative improvement and durability of the procedure. Establishing the new PSA nadir at 3-6 months after the procedure is recommended as a part of routine surveillance for prostate cancer in eligible patients.

Identifying predictors of antispasmodic use following robotic assisted simple prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Anticholinergic or ß-3 agonist use following robotic simple prostatectomy (RASP) is not well described. We describe rates of antispasmodic use following RASP and identify potential predictors of medication use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all RASP patients from 2/2016 - 1/2020 was conducted. Patients with no preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were excluded. Demographics, clinical data, and postoperative medication use were collected by electronic medical record review. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using a priori variables was performed to identify independent factors associated with antispasmodic use. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients underwent RASP at a mean age of 70.0 years ± 7.3 and mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.6 kg/m2 ± 5.0. Median preoperative prostate volume was 132.3 cc ± 45.0. Rates of preoperative diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), smoking and alcohol use were 19.6%, 6.3%, 3.1%, and 11.8% respectively; 8.6% of patients (n = 22) initiated antispasmodics at a median of 2.5 months (IQR 1.3-4.2) postoperatively. Median duration of antispasmodic use was 6.5 months (IQR 1.7-14.7). Mirabegron was most commonly prescribed (31.8%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, OSA was independently associated with postoperative antispasmodic use (OR 8.13, 95% CI 2.02-32.67, p = 0.003); 68.8% of OSA patients were treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Treatment was not significantly associated with postoperative antispasmodic use (p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Patients with OSA are over 8 times more likely to require antispasmodic medications following RASP in the short term. These patients may benefit from more tailored preoperative counseling.

[Trans-Douglas Retzius' space-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for large-volume benign prostate hyperplasia].

OBJECTIVE: To report the safety and efficacy of trans-Douglas Retzius' space-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RSS-RASP) in the treatment of large-volume BPH. METHODS: This retrospective study included 24 cases of large-volume (>80 ml) BPH treated by trans-Douglas RSS-RASP from August 2019 to June 2021. The patients ranged in age from 55 to 80 (mean 68.5) years, with an average body mass index of 25.1 (20.5－34.9) kg/m2 , median prostate volume of 132.4 (85.6－235.7) ml, and preoperative tPSA of 10.8 (0.5－37.9) ng/ml, IPSS of 25 (3－35) and quality of life (QOL) score of 5 (3－8). Before surgery, 12 of the patients received catheterization for urinary retention, 1 underwent cystostomy, 2 were complicated with hydronephrosis, 1 had stones and diverticulum in the bladder, and 14 were excluded from the cases of PCa by prostatic biopsy. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin level on the first day after surgery, blood transfusion, and intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. The patients were followed up for 3 to 21 months postoperatively. Comparisons were made before and after operation in the IPSS, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR), QOL score, IIEF score and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) score. RESULTS: Trans-Douglas RSS-RASP was successfully completed in all the 24 cases, with a mean operation time of 175 (100－285) min, intraoperative blood loss of 200 (50－800) ml, hemoglobin decrease of 25 (4－57) g/L on the first day after surgery, postoperative drainage tube indwelling of 3 (2－7) d, and urinary catheterization of 12 (4－18) d. Six (25%) of the patients received intraoperative blood transfusion, 1 underwent transurethral electrocoagulation hemostasis 1 month after surgery because of postoperative bleeding, and 1 received transurethral resection of the cicatrical adhesive tissue of the bladder neck 12 months after surgery. No other complications occurred postoperatively. The IPSS (3 ［1－7］), Qmax (19.6 ［9.9－32.1］ ml/s), PVR (0 ［0－34.9］ ml) and QOL score (2 ［0－3］) of the patients were significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.05), but no statistically significant differences were observed in the IIEF (20 ［19－24］) and MSHQ scores (14 ［13－14］) as compared with the baseline (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Trans-Douglas RSS-RASP is a safe and effective minimally invasive method for the treatment of large-volume (>80 ml) BPH, which can improve the urinary function of the patient after operation.

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART II-Surgical Evaluation and Treatment.

PURPOSE: Surgical therapies for symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are many, and vary from minimally invasive office based to high-cost operative approaches. This Guideline presents effective evidence-based surgical management of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary/attributed to BPH (LUTS/BPH). See accompanying algorithm for a detailed summary of procedures (figure[Figure: see text]). MATERIALS/METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible studies published between January 2007 and September 2020, which includes the initial publication (2018) and amendments (2019, 2020). The Team also reviewed articles identified by Guideline Panel Members. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Twenty-four guideline statements pertinent to pre-operative and surgical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct urologic providers towards suitable and safe operative interventions for individual patient characteristics. A re-treatment section was created to direct attention to longevity and outcomes with individual approaches to help guide patient counselling and therapeutic decisions. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative and surgical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics and procedural risk. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with criteria that yields the highest likelihood of surgical success when choosing a particular approach for a particular patient.

Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic vs open simple prostatectomy in the modern robotic era: results from the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes and hospitalisation cost between open (OSP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in the contemporary robotic era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NIS was queried for cases of OSP and RASP for the treatment of BPH between 2013 and 2016. Perioperative complications, unadjusted hospital cost and length of stay (LOS) were compared between RASP and OSP. Smoothed linear regression curves comparing hospitalisation cost by increasing LOS was stratified by surgical approach to identify point of cost equivalency between RASP and OSP. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to construct a hospitalisation cost model to examine the contribution of the robotic approach and LOS to hospitalisation cost. RESULTS: The total analytical cohort included 2551 OSP and 704 RASP procedures. Patients undergoing RASP were younger, at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 68 (63-73) vs 71 (65-77) years, and with less comorbidity (76.8% vs 86.5%, P < 0.01). RASP was associated with fewer total complications (11.1% vs 29.2%, P < 0.01) and a greater likelihood of routine discharge to home rather than another facility (88.9% vs 76.7%, P < 0.01). While LOS was shorter with RASP (median [IQR], 2 [1-3] vs 4 [3-6] days, P < 0.01), total unadjusted hospitalisation cost (in United States dollars) was greater (median [IQR], $10 855 [$7965-$15 675] vs $13 467 [$10 572-$17 722], P < 0.01). Presence of any complication increased both LOS and hospitalisation cost (P < 0.01). Linear regression modelling determined the point of cost equivalence between RASP staying a median of 2 days was an OSP case staying between 5 and 6 days. On multivariable regression analysis, the robotic approach contributed an additional $6175 (P < 0.01) to the cost model, whereas each additional day of hospitalisation contributed $1687 (P < 0.01), suggesting LOS would need to be 3-4 days shorter with RASP to offset surgical costs of the robot. CONCLUSIONS: While RASP appears to have significantly better perioperative complication rates with shorter LOS and likely discharge to home, total hospitalisation cost remained greater, likely related to upfront operative costs. While this retrospective study is limited by selection bias for patients undergoing RASP, the benefits of improved convalescence, discharge to home, and lower rate of perioperative complications appear to justify performance of RASP in an experienced pelvic robotic centre despite relatively greater hospitalisation cost if referral to an experienced holmium laser enucleation of the prostate centre is not feasible.

From open simple to robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for large benign prostate hyperplasia: the time has come.

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has recently been studied as an alternative to open simple prostatectomy or endoscopic treatment options. At present, there is no defined recommendation for a robotic procedure as a standard surgical technique to treat large benign prostate hyperplasia. METHODS: Several robotic techniques have been described since 2007. Contemporaneously, multiple endoscopic enucleation techniques have been proposed. Nevertheless, open simple prostatectomy still remains a mainstay of therapy. We aimed to evaluate the development of robotic-assisted prostatectomy for large benign prostatic obstruction, thus comparing the technical aspects and clinical outcomes with open and endoscopic enucleation. RESULTS: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy provides significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stay but longer operative time compared to open simple prostatectomy. Compared to endoscopic treatments, robotic approaches have a similar perioperative outcome, but cause less urethral trauma or potential bladder neck strictures. Moreover, concomitant bladder pathologies can be treated within the same setting. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is an effective and safe technique, and can hence be considered to become the preferred first-line therapy to treat patients with obstructive large prostate glands.

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a single-center comparison.

PURPOSE: Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is a standard surgical technique for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate size larger than 80 ml. As a minimally invasive approach, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) emerged as a feasible surgical alternative. Currently, there are no definite recommendations for the standard use of RASP. Therefore, we aimed at investigating various clinical outcomes comparing RASP with OSP. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated clinical data from 103 RASP and 31 OSP patients. Both cohorts were compared regarding different clinical characteristics with and without propensity score matching. To detect independent predictive factors for clinical outcomes, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy patients demonstrated a lower estimated blood loss and need for postoperative blood transfusions as well as less postoperative complications. OSP had a shorter operative time (125 min vs. 182 min) longer hospital stay (11 days vs. 9 days) and longer time to catheter removal (8 days vs. 6 days). In the multivariate analysis, RASP was identified as an independent predictor for longer operative time, lower estimated blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, shorter time to catheter removal, less postoperative complications and blood transfusions. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a safe alternative to OSP with less perioperative and postoperative morbidity. Whether OSP (shorter operative time) or RASP (shorter length of hospital stay) has a more favorable economic impact depends on the particular conditions of different health care systems. Further prospective comparative research is warranted to define the value of RASP in the current surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy vs bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate in large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a two-center 3-year comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare surgery outcomes and safety of button bipolar enucleation of the prostate vs laparoscopic simple prostatectomy in patients with large prostates (> 80 g) in a two-center cohort study. METHODS: All patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement (Prostate volume > 80 cc) undergoing button bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BTUEP) or laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) in two centers were enrolled. Data on clinical history, physical examination, urinary symptoms, uroflowmetry and prostate volume were collected at 0, 1, 3 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Early and long-term complications were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 296 patients were enrolled. Out of them, 167/296 (56%) performed a LSP and 129/296 (44%) performed a BTUEP. In terms of efficacy both procedures showed durable results at three years with a reintervention rate of 8% in the LSP group and of 5% in the BTUEP group. In terms of safety, BTUEP and LSP presented similar safety profiles with a 9% of transfusion rate and no major complications. CONCLUSION: LSP and BTUEP are safe and effective in treating large-volume adenomas with durable results at three years when performed in experienced centers.

Perioperative and 1-year patient-reported outcomes of Freyer versus Millin versus Madigan robot-assisted simple prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is an established surgical procedure for the management of obstructive symptoms caused by large adenomas. Traditionally, this is performed according to the trans-vescical (Freyer) or trans-capsular (Millin) technique. We recently described a novel urethra-sparing (Madigan) robotic technique which showed promising preliminary results. In this study, we compared the above techniques for perioperative and 1-year patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent RASP across the three techniques, performed by two experienced surgeons in our center. We assessed patient self-reported pre-operative and post-operative functional outcomes with validated questionnaires: IPSS, IIEF short form, ICIQ short form, MSHQ Short Form. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between groups using the Mood's median test and the Chi-square tests, respectively. RESULTS: Millin, Madigan and Freyer procedures were performed in 23 (51%), 14 (31%) and 8 (18%) cases, respectively. No significant differences were observed for baseline ASA score, BMI, prostate volume, IPSS, IIEF, ICIQ and MSHQ scores (all p ≥ 0.2), as well as post-operative obstructive symptoms relief (IPSS: p = 0.25), continence (ICIQ: p = 0.54), complication rates (p = 0.32) and hospital stay (p = 0.23). Operative time was longer for Madigan procedures (p = 0.05). The 1-year MSHQ and IIEF scores were significantly higher in the Madigan cohort (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: RASP proved to be a safe surgical approach, providing an effective and durable relief of obstructive symptoms at mid-term follow-up regardless of the technique used. The Madigan technique provided significant benefits in terms of self-assessed quality of sexual function.