Hyperechogenicity and histopathological features of focal liver lesions.

The identification and accurate diagnosis of focal liver lesions are important in modern medicine, where diagnostic radiology plays an essential role. This review aimed to examine the hyperechogenicity and histopathological features of focal liver lesions. Hyperechogenic liver lesions can be either benign or malignant. Evidence shows that hyperechogenicity is caused by factors such as fat deposition, sinusoidal dilation, peliotic changes, and pseudoglandular patterns. Fat deposition is a common cause of increased echogenicity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, sinusoidal dilation and peliotic changes are more frequently observed in larger HCC nodules. Pseudoglandular patterns, characterized by the reflection of ultrasound waves at the walls of numerous acini, are associated with hyperechogenicity in well-to-moderately differentiated HCCs. Moreover, this review comprehensively examined the histological features that may cause hyperechogenic internal echoes in not only HCCs but also localized liver lesions (metastases of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasm, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cavernous hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and angiomyolipoma). To make an accurate diagnosis and provide appropriate management, it is important to understand the histopathological basis for hyperechogenicity in focal liver lesions. By maximizing the accuracy of imaging studies and enhancing the radiology-pathology correlation, unnecessary biopsies can be avoided, thereby reducing potential complications and mortality. This review can help facilitate the effective management of patients with focal liver lesions, thereby resulting in timely and appropriate treatment decision-making.

APAP-Induced IκBß/NFκB Signaling Drives Hepatic Il6 Expression and Associated Sinusoidal Dilation.

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose results in high morbidity and mortality, with limited treatment options. Increased understanding of the cellular signaling pathways activated in response to toxic APAP exposure is needed to provide insight into novel therapeutic strategies. Toxic APAP exposure induces hepatic nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) activation. NFκB signaling has been identified to mediate the proinflammatory response but also induces a prosurvival and regenerative response. It is currently unknown whether potentiating NFkB activation would be injurious or advantageous after APAP overdose. The NFκB inhibitory protein beta (IκBß) dictates the duration and degree of the NFκB response following exposure to oxidative injuries. Thus, we sought to determine whether IκBß/NFκB signaling contributes to APAP-induced hepatic injury. At late time points (24 h) following toxic APAP exposures, mice expressing only IκBß knock-in mice (AKBI mice) exhibited increased serologic evidence of hepatic injury. This corresponded with increased histologic injury, specifically related to sinusoidal dilatation. When compared with wild type mice, AKBI mice demonstrated sustained hepatic nuclear translocation of the NFκB subunits p65 and p50, and enhanced NFκB target gene expression. This included increased expression of interleukin-6 (Il-6), a known contributor to hepatic sinusoidal dilation. This transcriptional response corresponded with increased plasma protein content of Il-6, as well as increased activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.

Hepatic histopathology and postoperative outcome after preoperative chemotherapy for Chinese patients with colorectal liver metastases.

AIM: To assess the effects of preoperative treatment on the hepatic histology of non-tumoral liver and the postoperative outcome. METHODS: One hundred and six patients underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases between 1999 and 2009. The surgical specimens were reviewed with established criteria for diagnosis and grading of pathological hepatic injury. The impact of preoperative therapy on liver injury and postoperative outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (50%) received surgery alone, whereas 42 patients (39.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 11 (10.4%) patients received preoperative hepatic artery infusion (HAI). Chemotherapy included oxaliplatin-based regimens (31.1%) and irinotecan-based regimens (8.5%). On histopathological analysis, 16 patients (15.1%) had steatosis, 31 (29.2%) had sinusoidal dilation and 20 patients (18.9%) had steatohepatitis. Preoperative oxaliplatin was associated with sinusoidal dilation compared with surgery alone (42.4% vs 20.8%, P = 0.03); however, the perioperative complication rate was not significantly different between the oxaliplatin group and surgery group (27.3% vs 13.2%, P = 0.1). HAI was associated with more steatosis, sinusoidal dilation and steatohepatitis than the surgery group, with higher perioperative morbidity (36.4% vs 13.2%, P = 0.06) and mortality (9.1% vs 0% P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Preoperative oxaliplatin was associated with sinusoidal dilation compared with surgery alone. However, the preoperative oxaliplatin had no significant impact on perioperative outcomes. HAI can cause pathological changes and tends to increase perioperative morbidity and mortality.