Consensus of the Taiwanese dermatological association and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society on the prevention and management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related skin toxicities in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: An updated version incorporating Taiwanese treatment experience.

The 2023 consensus from the Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society (TLCS) addresses the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced skin toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Providing a comprehensive overview, the consensus reflects recent advances in understanding causes and developmental processes of TKI-related skin toxicities. Aimed at guiding clinicians in Taiwan, the consensus integrates new treatment perspectives while incorporating experiences from local dermatology experts. Recommendations underwent a voting process, achieving consensus when 75% or more of experts agreed, leading to their inclusion. Approved by over 90% of participants, the recommended treatment algorithms for major skin toxicities offer valuable insights for clinicians managing TKI-associated effects in NSCLC patients.

Cutaneous eruptions from ibrutinib resembling epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced dermatologic adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib is an oral inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for several lymphoproliferative disorders and chronic graft-versus-host disease. OBJECTIVE: To characterize cutaneous eruptions arising from ibrutinib and highlight overlap with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced dermatologic adverse events. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort of patients referred to the Skin Toxicities Program for treatment of cutaneous eruptions while taking ibrutinib. RESULTS: Among 19 patients, cutaneous eruptions manifested as facial-predominant papulopustular eruptions, petechiae, or ecchymoses, photosensitivity, panniculitis, xerosis, and clinical staphylococcal overgrowth. Most patients were able to continue ibrutinib therapy with focused treatment of their cutaneous toxicities. LIMITATIONS: This study represents cases at a single tertiary care center and is limited to patients referred for toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of petechiae, the cutaneous toxicities of ibrutinib overlap with those associated with selective EGFR inhibitors. We observed that these reactions can be successfully managed using approaches for EGFR inhibitor-induced cutaneous adverse events.

Ibrutinib skin toxicities: Report of two cases.

Ibrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat many hematologic conditions, most commonly B-cell lymphomas and leukemias. Reportedly, skin rash is an adverse event in up to 27% of treated patients. Histopathologic description of these lesions is limited. We present two cases of ibrutinib-associated skin toxicities showing diverse histopathologic features. Case 1: A 72-year-old man was started on ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Two months later, he developed multiple erythematous crusted papules on the chest, abdomen, and extremities. Biopsies revealed varied histopathology including poorly formed granulomatous dermatitis, epidermal necrosis, ulceration, and panniculitis. Ibrutinib was discontinued and his skin lesions resolved within 1 month. Case 2: A 48-year-old man received ibrutinib after failing standard therapy for primary central nervous system EBV positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Two months after initiation of ibrutinib, he developed multiple firm, red, non-tender nodules on the forehead, buttock, and thigh. Biopsies revealed "pseudolymphoma"-like reaction with dense pandermal lymphohistiocytic inflammation and granulomas. His skin toxicity resolved without cessation of therapy. Awareness of the spectrum of histopathologic features that may be encountered in skin lesions of patients treated with ibrutinib, as illustrated by these two cases, will be critical for optimal patient management.

A phase 2 study for evaluating doxycycline 50 mg once daily and 100 mg once daily as preemptive treatment for skin toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with an anti-EGFR and chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life outcomes of doxycycline 50 or 100 mg once daily in the prevention of skin toxicity in patients undergoing chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR therapy as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Phase II, multicenter, single-arm, exploratory study was conducted in 7 Spanish hospitals. The primary study outcome was the incidence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week skin treatment period. Quality of life was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Patients had to receive either doxycycline 50 mg once daily in a first stage with 10 patients, or, if more than three patients presented ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities, the next 30 patients had to receive 100 mg once daily. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with RAS wild-type mCRC were enrolled in the study. Ten patients were first treated with doxycycline 50 mg once daily, and the following 24 were treated with doxycycline 100 mg once daily. A total of 60.0% (95% CI 29.6-90.0) and 20.8% (95% CI 4.6-37.0) of patients who received doxycycline 50 mg/day and 100 mg/day, respectively, had at least one ≥ grade 2 skin toxicity. Patients treated with doxycycline 100 mg once daily experienced less QoL deterioration. Only 1 patient reported a mild doxycycline-related gastrointestinal adverse event. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that doxycycline doses as low as 100 mg once daily are efficacious and well tolerated for the prevention of skin toxicity in patients with mCRC who undergo treatment with chemotherapy plus EGFR-targeted therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03448731.

Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This review aims to formulate unambiguous supportive care interventions by comparing RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by several organizations: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), and International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC). METHODS: Areas of agreement and discordance were assessed among the MASCC, BCCA, CCMB, ONS, SCoR, and ISNCC guidelines. RESULTS: Treatment recommendations across guidelines for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities have been summarized. The strongest agreement among the guidelines exists for the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. All guidelines recommend the use of topical corticosteroids, and washing with water and soap is consistently supported. There is minimal consensus on an optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management. MASCC weakly recommends prophylactic use of silver sulfadiazine to reduce RD, while BCCA, CCMB, and SCoR recommend its use upon signs of infection. MASCC and CCMB recommend the use of a long-pulsed dye laser to manage telangiectasia, a late effect of RT. CONCLUSIONS: Given the extent of discordance among guideline recommendations, further research is recommended to establish optimal treatments for RD prophylaxis and management.

Long-term response control in a patient with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer after treatment with nivolumab: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab is a fully human programmed death control immune point 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody which promotes antitumor immunity. Cutaneous toxicity associated with nivolumab, immune system related, could be linked to a more durable response in patients with squamous cell lung cancer. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 62-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer, who was treated with nivolumab after cytotoxic chemotherapy. After treatment discontinuation, due to grade 2 cutaneous toxicity, the patient is maintaining with durable partial response for more than one year with close follow-up. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Cumulative doses of nivolumab could cause immunological toxicities that may prolong survival of these patients even after discontinuation of treatment. DISCUSSION: Nivolumab was approved by European Medicines Agency (EMA), as second-line therapeutic, for the treatment of squamous cell lung cancer, showing a median of 9.23 months of overall survival. The development of immune-related skin toxicities has been associated with greater clinical benefit in patients with lung cancer. When cutaneous toxicity forces to nivolumab suspension, in certain cases, the option of not starting again and closely following up the patient may appear reasonable, even though there are no survival data in this context. Suspension of treatment with close monitoring of these patients until progression may be an alternative, since immune-related skin toxicities could be related to a greater clinical benefit and a durable response to nivolumab.

Skin Toxicities with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

We fully investigate the skin toxicities of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in cancer patients. The studies about randomized controlled trials in cancer treatment with EGFR-TKIs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. The results suggest that EGFR-TKIs significantly increase the risk of skin toxicities including all-grade rash, pruritus, dry skin, and high-grade rash, pruritus. However, the risk of high-grade dry skin did not increase. Rash was the most common toxicity. Physicians should be aware of skin toxicities and should monitor cancer patients when receiving EGFR-TKIs.

Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma.

The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase each year. Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths, but treatment is usually curative following early detection of disease. In this American Academy of Dermatology clinical practice guideline, updated treatment recommendations are provided for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-IIC and pathologic stage III by virtue of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy). Biopsy techniques for a lesion that is clinically suggestive of melanoma are reviewed, as are recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of cutaneous melanoma. The use of laboratory, molecular, and imaging tests is examined in the initial work-up of patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and for follow-up of asymptomatic patients. With regard to treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, recommendations for surgical margins and the concepts of staged excision (including Mohs micrographic surgery) and nonsurgical treatments for melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type (including topical imiquimod and radiation therapy), are updated. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging technique for cutaneous melanoma is described, with recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Finally, current data regarding pregnancy and melanoma, genetic testing for familial melanoma, and management of dermatologic toxicities related to novel targeted agents and immunotherapies for patients with advanced disease are summarized.

Principles of prophylactic and therapeutic management of skin toxicity during treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

The introduction of immunotherapy into the treatment of cancer patients has revolutionised the oncological approach and significantly improved patient survival. The key drugs are immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), whose mechanism of action is to elicit immune response against cancer cell antigens. Three types of CPIs are currently used and approved: an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, ipilimumab; anti-PD-1 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab; and anti-PD-L1 antibodies: atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab. CPIs have been widely used in metastatic and adjuvant melanoma settings, metastatic lung cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma, renal cancer, bladder cancer, head and neck tumours, and Merkel cell carcinoma. However, side effects of CPIs differ from toxicities of other oncological drugs. According to literature data, in 10-30% of patients CPIs are responsible for immune-related adverse events (irAE) associated with excessive activation of the immune system. Systemic irAEs include enterocolitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, nephritis, hypophysitis, and autoimmune thyroid disease. However, the most common irAEs of checkpoint inhibitors are dermatologic toxicities ranging from pruritus and mild dermatoses to severe reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Each irAE can become serious if not early diagnosed and appropriately treated. In the article we present different types of skin irAEs related to CPIs together with the recommended therapies.

Dermoscopic assessment of skin toxicities in patients with melanoma during treatment with vemurafenib.

INTRODUCTION: The use of vemurafenib in melanoma has improved the survival of patients; however, it is associated with skin toxicities. AIM: To assess skin toxicities by dermoscopy in patients treated with vemurafenib. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive metastatic melanoma were examined dermoscopically during vemurafenib treatment. All skin lesions occurring during therapy were assessed clinically and dermoscopically using a hand-held dermoscope with polarised and non-polarised light. Skin lesions suspected for malignancy appearing during therapy were totally surgically excised with consecutive histopathological examination. RESULTS: All 8 examined patients developed skin toxicity. The majority of patients (7/8) presented G1 skin toxicity according to CTCAE version 4.3. Only 1 of them had G2 skin toxicity. The most common dermoscopy findings in our study were hyperkeratotic verrucas in 5 patients (5/8) with structureless pattern. In some of them we also observed central dots, exophytic proliferation, hairpin vessels and homogeneous haemorrhage. Other findings were hyperkeratosis of the nipples (5/8) with brownish to yellowish, angular clods with a tendency to be more confluent in dermoscopy. Palmar plantar erythrodysaesthesia (3/8) showed dermoscopically a yellowish, homogeneous pattern. Four melanocytic skin lesions in 2 patients were surgically excised due to suspected malignant transformation. In most of them we observed an atypical pigmented network (abrupt cut-off, big holes), atypical globules and a homogeneous blue pattern; however, histopathological diagnosis excluded any malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Dermoscopy seems to be an easily performed and valuable method for assessment of skin toxicities during oncological therapy, at any time of the treatment.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association consensus for the prevention and management of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related skin toxicities.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This report describes the 2016 consensus of the Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) regarding the definition, classification, diagnosis, prevention, and management of skin toxicities resulting from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This consensus is distributed to practices throughout Taiwan to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of such skin toxicities in order to improve the quality of life of patients undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment. The consensus thus serves as an important reference for dermatologists and other interested clinicians, such as oncologists, throughout Taiwan. METHODS: All the consensus contents were voted on by the participating experts, with approval by no less than 75% required for inclusion. RESULTS: The consensus provides a comprehensive overview of EGFR-TKI skin toxicities, including recent advances in identifying their causes and the processes by which they develop. CONCLUSION: All the consensus meeting attendees agreed that there are several major EGFR-TKI-related skin toxicities, including acneiform rash (i.e., papulopustular rash), xeroderma, pruritus, paronychia, stomatitis, mucositis, and hair changes (such as hair loss, slowed hair growth, and trichomegaly). The experts were also generally unanimous in their voting on the specific definitions, onset times, and care suggestions for each of those skin toxicities. Furthermore, the recommended treatment algorithms for the various skin toxicities were ultimately approved by 100% (15/15) of the consensus attendees.

Randomized controlled trial on the skin toxicity of panitumumab in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: HGCSG1001 study; J-STEPP.

AIM: We planned a randomized, open-label trial to evaluate differences between pre-emptive and reactive skin treatment for panitumumab (Pmab)-associated skin toxicities in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients receiving third-line Pmab-containing regimens were randomized to pre-emptive or reactive treatment. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of ≥grade 2 skin toxicities during 6 weeks. Retrospectively, a dermatologist reviewed skin toxicities, in a blinded manner. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were enrolled (pre-emptive: 47, reactive: 48). The primary end point was achieved (21.3 and 62.5% [risk ratio: 0.34; p < 0.001], for pre-emptive and reactive treatment, respectively). A similar trend was observed in central review. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive skin treatment could reduce the severity of Pmab-associated skin toxicities in Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Erlotinib-related skin toxicities: treatment strategies in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Skin toxicities are the most common side effects associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib, occurring in most patients receiving the drug. Clinical trials evaluating erlotinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer have reported a range of skin disorders, the most common being acneiform rash, xeroderma (dry skin), pruritus, and paronychia. Although in the majority of cases these effects are mild and transient, they can have a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life and, if particularly severe and persistent, may necessitate treatment interruption or cessation and compromise treatment outcome. This coupled with recent evidence to suggest a positive correlation between the incidence and severity of rash and clinical outcome among erlotinib-treated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer highlights the importance of adequately managing epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor--related skin disorders. Clear treatment strategies are therefore necessary to ensure the prevention and optimal management of erlotinib-related skin toxicities thereby enabling patients to continue erlotinib treatment. In this review we present a practical approach for the treatment of erlotinib-related cutaneous side effects in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer providing details of specific treatment interventions, according to symptom severity, for each of the common skin disorders. In addition, the importance of preventive skin care measures--namely maintaining cleanliness, moisturization, and protection from external stimuli--in preventing the development of serious skin disorders is discussed and guidelines for the practice of proper skin care are presented.

Skin Toxicities Associated with Botulin Toxin Injection for Aesthetic Procedures: Data from the European Spontaneous Reporting System.

Botulinum toxin is a protein deriving from the bacteria Clostridium botulinum and it is widely used for the treatment of a variety of muscle hyperactivity syndromes and for cosmetic indications. Having a long-lasting effect, Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is one of the most botulin toxin products used. Even if BTA has shown benefits in reducing the vertical lines between the eyebrows, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) have been experienced as well, of which the most common ones are headache and drooping eyelids. In addition, since other local and systemic risks have been identified, a non-interventional post-authorization safety study (PASS) has been started. The aim of the present study was to report cases of skin toxicity associated with this drug, considering Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) existing on the Eudravigilance website. Among 1464 ICSRs sent to the EV database, 718 ICSRs, including 5154 PTs, reported BTA as a suspected drug associated with cutaneous toxicity. The majority of patients experiencing BTA-induced skin toxicity were female (92.1%) belonging mostly to the age group of 18-64 years. The most serious criteria, when reported, were "Other Medically Important Condition" and "Caused/prolonged hospitalization", although the outcome was mainly reported as "Unknown". The most reported PTs, related to skin disorders, were: "Erythema", "Rash", "Pruritus", "Urticaria", "Swelling face", "Brow ptosis", "Eyelid ptosis", "Injection site pain", and "Angioedema". Considering that in most ICSRs, ADRs related to skin disorders were symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions which in some conditions could be life-threatening, further studies are required to better define the safety profile of BTA used for aesthetic procedures.

Mechanism of Lethal Skin Toxicities Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Related Treatment Strategies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are widely used to treat various types of cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer. Adverse reactions such as skin toxicity, interstitial lung disease, hepatotoxicity, ocular toxicity, hypomagnesemia, stomatitis, and diarrhea may occur during treatment. Because the EGFR signaling pathway is important for maintaining normal physiological skin function. Adverse skin reactions occurred in up to 90% of cancer patients treated with EGFR inhibitors, including common skin toxicities (such as papulopustular exanthemas, paronychia, hair changes) and rare fatal skin toxicities (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis). This has led to the dose reduction or discontinuation of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Recently, progress has been made about research on the skin toxicity of EGFR inhibitors. Here, we summarize the mechanism of skin toxicity caused by EGFR inhibitors, measures to prevent severe fatal skin toxicity, and provide reference for medical staff how to give care and treatment after adverse skin reactions.

The Impact of Acne, Atopic Dermatitis, Skin Toxicities and Scars on Quality of Life and the Importance of a Holistic Treatment Approach.

Skin conditions such as acne, atopic dermatitis, skin toxicity from oncology treatment, and scars are among the most common health conditions and negatively impact quality of life (QoL). Yet the physician perception of this impact often varies greatly from the patient perception. This is important because patient illness perception is closely linked with seeking help and treatment adherence behaviors. The objective of this review is to better understand the impact of these four highly prevalent skin conditions on QoL including their health-related economic factors to improve treatment outcomes. The literature search included literature published on QoL with acne, atopic dermatitis, scars (from any cause) and skin toxicities on PubMed between 2015 and 2020. We found that patients with skin conditions have a much higher frequency of altered QoL and psychological distress than those without. Also, skin conditions negatively impact self-image and can cause feelings of isolation, loneliness, lower self-esteem, and lower body satisfaction. Additionally, physical discomfort adds to the psychological distress. These physical and psychological impacts are an enormous financial burden on patients, their families and society. We found evidence that holistic treatment including treating the skin condition itself, providing wider peer and psychological support as well as shared decision-making, therapeutic patient education and dermatologist involvement improves outcomes. Holistic history-taking, checklists, or the use of more formal QoL scoring tools can be incorporated into routine consultations to better assess patient well-being and provide clinicians with important information for adapting treatment to individual patient requirements. In conclusion, this review highlights the overall impact of skin conditions (including psychological and QoL impacts) and the importance of providing holistic care to optimize treatment outcomes. A comprehensive QoL screening tool would be useful to help provide patient-centered treatment.

Radiodermatitis and Fibrosis in the Context of Breast Radiation Therapy: A Critical Review.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy has been progressively improved in order to maintain a satisfactory tumour response, while reducing toxicity. We will review the incidence of radiodermatitis and fibrosis according to the various radiation and fractionation techniques. We will then focus on the various methods used to manage, prevent, and quantify this toxicity. METHOD: More than 1753 articles were identified using the various search terms. We selected 53 articles to answer the questions addressed in this study according to criteria set in advance. RESULT: The literature reports lower acute toxicity with IMRT compared to 3DCRT, but no significant differences in terms of late toxicities. Partial breast irradiation appears to be less effective in terms of local control with a higher rate of late toxicity. Intra operative radiation therapy appears to provide good results in terms of both local control and late toxicity. The hypofractionation has equivalent efficacy and safety to the normofractionated regimen, but with lower rates of radiodermatitis and fibrosis. The adddition of a boost, particularly a sequential boost, increases the risk of fibrosis and radiodermatitis during treatment. CONCLUSION: The development of IMRT has significantly reduced acute toxicity and has improved tolerability during treatment. Modified fractionation has reduced treatment time, as well as adverse effects.

Cutaneous Toxicities in Lung Cancer Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have transformed the treatment of lung cancer in the recent years. However, disruption in immune homeostasis produces a unique spectrum of side effects termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous irAE are the most prevalent toxicity from the ICPIs. While there have been descriptions of the cutaneous irAEs from ICPIs in melanoma patients, observations are limited in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is the largest single-institution cohort of NSCLC patients with cutaneous irAEs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of our institution's electronic medical records from January 2017 to December 2018 with at least 1 year of follow up to characterize cutaneous adverse events induced by single agent anti PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in treatment of NSCLC. RESULTS: In total, 64 patients (40 men and 24 female) were identified with cutaneous irAE. The median time-to-onset was 3 months. Eczematous, morbilliform, and acneiform rashes were most prevalent. There were 28 patients who had previous dermatologic conditions and only 4 of them had related cutaneous manifestations. Most patients' (70%) rashes improved or resolved after treatment with oral antihistamines and topical steroids. Eight (13%) of them had a dose impact to their cancer treatment due to their rash, with 4 (6%) patients discontinuing their ICPIs. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous adverse events appears to be one of the most prevalent irAEs with ICPIs and has been reported with all anti PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. While in most cases these dermatologic adverse events remain self-limiting, they may cause treatment interruption and impact life quality. Recognition and early intervention may improve patient symptoms and therapy compliance.

ONS Guidelines™ for Cancer Treatment-Related Skin Toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Management of cancer treatment-related skin toxicities can minimize treatment disruptions and improve patient well-being. OBJECTIVES: This guideline aims to support patients and clinicians in decisions regarding management of cancer treatment-related skin toxicities. METHODS: A panel developed a guideline for management of cancer treatment-related skin toxicities using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) for certainty of evidence and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine criteria for trustworthy guidelines. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool assessed risk of bias. A quantitative or narrative synthesis of the evidence was completed. RESULTS: The panel issued seven conditional recommendations for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor rash, hand-foot skin reaction, hand-foot syndrome, and chemotherapy-induced alopecia. The panel suggested strategies for prevention and treatment for all toxicities except hand-foot syndrome, which only has a prevention recommendation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Cancer treatment-related skin toxicities can significantly affect quality of life. Incorporation of these interventions into clinical care can improve patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT&NBSP;HTTPS: //onf.ons.org/supplementary-material-ons-guidelines-cancer-treatment-related-skin-toxicity.

Network pharmacology-based preventive effect of XZF on cutaneous toxicities induced by EGFR inhibitor.

Skin toxicities induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors such as Erlotinib plagues clinical challenges. Chinese formulas have a unique advantage in reducing side effects. Here, we aim to investigate the skin protecting function of XiaoZhenFang (XZF), a clinical adjuvant prescription made up of Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, Lithospermum Erythrorhizon, Smilacis Glabrae Rhizoma, Forsythiae Fructus, Spirodelae Herba, Cortex Moutan and Prunellae Spica. Our data showed that XZF aqueous extract effectively reduced skin toxicities induced by Erlotinib in vivo using established mice model. Next, we used a systems pharmacology approach to investigate the pharmacological mechanism of XZF with the goal of understanding its effects at the system, organ, and molecular levels. 44 candidate compounds and 103 potential targets were identified by network pharmacology. Inflammation, cell stress and the EGFR-related signal pathways, which may participate in the skin protection afforded by XZF, were analyzed by gene enrichment. Importantly, our in vivo experimental results largely validated XZF's mechanism of action, as predicted by the system pharmacology analysis. Our study uncovered the effect and mechanism of XZF in attenuating skin toxicities induced by EGFRI, providing a basis for the development of in-hospital preparations and new drugs for the prevention of skin toxicities.