Optimizing HIV PrEP Persistence: Does Your Pharmacy Matter?

Persistence to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is integral to preventing new HIV infections. Previous studies have shown real-world PrEP persistence is low and insight is needed into PrEP delivery strategies that improve persistence. This single-center, retrospective, cohort study measured persistence in patients filling PrEP through an integrated health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) compared to those filling at external pharmacies. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for persistence probability at 6, 12, and 18 months were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95), 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.76) for the HSSP cohort compared to 0.65 (95% CI 0.51-0.83), 0.41 (95% CI 0.28-0.62), and 0.32 (95% CI 0.2-0.53), respectively, for the non-HSSP cohort (log-rank p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 11.2). Cox PH modeling showed that patients using a non-HSSP were 2.7 times more likely to be non-persistent than HSSP patients (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.7, p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 12.61), demonstrating patients were better maintained on PrEP therapy when their prescriptions were filled with the HSSP.

Review of Dual Biologics in Specialty Pharmacy Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and review the published evidence on use of multiple biologics within specialty pharmacy practice. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed and Embase was conducted from October 2021 through September 2022. Keywords included biologics for immune-mediated conditions along with the terms "dual," "add-on," and "combination." STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All human studies in the English language were considered. Published abstracts, case reports, case series, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Although evidence is limited, there are published meta-analyses of combined biologic use within gastroenterology and rheumatology. There are also numerous case reports within dermatology. Clinical trials of dual biologics for severe rheumatologic conditions and inflammatory bowel disease are in progress. Existing evidence for use in pulmonology and allergy suggest dual biologic therapy can be safe and effective, but data are limited. Literature describing use of monoclonal antibodies for other overlapping conditions is lacking. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This article reviews the evidence describing combination biologic use and outlines remaining knowledge gaps. It also describes the essential role that specialty pharmacists play in managing therapeutic mAbs. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality evidence describing combination biologic use is limited and long-term safety data are lacking. Pharmacists should utilize their specialized training to assess appropriateness of therapy, provide patient counseling and monitor for safety and efficacy.

Impact of health system specialty pharmacies on total cost of care in cancer treatment, a multisite review.

INTRODUCTION: Integrated delivery networks can use medically integrated dispensing of oral oncolytics on site through health system specialty pharmacies. There is little published research examining cost savings. Our objective was to demonstrate the financial value of health system specialty pharmacies among patients receiving oral oncolytics dispensed through fully, partially, and non-integrated dispensing strategies. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients from Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse® repository who filled a prescription for an agent of interest from 7/1/16-6/30/20 that was written within 25 US health systems. Outcomes included costs, healthcare resource utilization, and duration of therapy. RESULTS: In total, 36,816 patients were included; 986 patients (2.7%) integrated, 1,822 (4.9%) partially integrated, and 34,008 (92.4%) non-integrated. Mean 6-month medical charge and oncolytic prescription costs were lower for the integrated group ($36,831; $55,786) than the partially integrated ($46,304, p = 0.053; $63,295, p = 0.071) and non-integrated groups ($54,261, p < 0.001; $65,005, p = 0.004). In most healthcare resource utilization categories, the integrated group had the lowest patient percentage utilizing medical care. Duration of therapy was lower on average by ∼3 months in the integrated vs non-integrated group, which may represent closer monitoring of patient medical records and need for fills vs autoship practices. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving oral oncolytics through medically integrated dispensing at health system specialty pharmacies may have lower medical and pharmacy costs and decreased healthcare resource utilization. This study adds to the growing body of literature supporting integrated delivery networks and integrated dispensing. Further research is needed to demonstrate the value of medically integrated dispensing through health system specialty pharmacies in the delivery of treatment to patients with cancer and other high-cost diseases.

Specialty pharmacy interventions benefit patients receiving HIV post-exposure prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Specialty pharmacies service many different complex disease states that require high-cost medication, including the treatment of patients prescribed HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). PEP requires time-sensitive initiation and patient counseling for therapeutic efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine all PEP referrals received at a specialty pharmacy and demonstrate how they aided in interventions including assisting in obtaining financial assistance, making clinical interventions, and offering counseling to patients. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective chart review of patients who received PEP from one specialty pharmacy. All patients that filled PEP at the pharmacy between January 1st, 2017-July 1st, 2022, were included. Information was collected from documentation provided in the electronic medication record utilized by the pharmacy. The PEP regimen prescribed were raltegravir (RAL) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) and dolutegravir (DTG) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF). RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were treated with PEP during the measurement period. Patients who received a PEP regimen of RAL + FTC/TDF experienced a total cost-savings of $1,692.60 and $218.40 for those who were fully insured and uninsured, respectively. Patients who received a PEP regimen of DTG + FTC/TDF experienced a total cost-savings of $676.20 and $2,725.50 for those who were fully insured and uninsured, respectively. Counseling by a pharmacist was offered to all patients and 74.5% of patients accepted. Pharmacists made clinical interventions on 29.4% of PEP referrals. CONCLUSION: PEP medications are expensive, time-sensitive, and can require clinical interventions and specific patient counseling. This study indicates that specialty pharmacies can provide and ensure access to care in the areas of financial assistance, patient counseling, and clinical interventions.

Addressing the Challenges of Novel Oncology and Hematology Treatments Across Sites of Care: Specialty Pharmacy Solutions.

Background: The number of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for anticancer therapies has significantly increased in recent years, but these novel therapies are costly and present challenges to patients and providers. Many institutions have implemented health systems specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) to help patients and providers navigate financial and logistical barriers to treatment with oral anticancer therapies. Patients on oral anticancer therapy are often treated across multiple sites of care which can complicate the inpatient specialty medication initiation process. Health systems often limit inclusion of oral anticancer therapies for inpatient administration due to costs, however several new therapies necessitate admission for treatment initiation. Health systems are then faced with the challenge of starting costly oral anticancer therapy inpatient and ensuring continued access to therapy upon discharge. We describe the integrated HSSP multidisciplinary approach to this MUP including providers, inpatient and outpatient pharmacists, specialty and inpatient pharmacies, institutional procurement team, and the institutional pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee to streamline this process.The HSSP multidisciplinary processes addresses a growing need for cancer patients to receive timely and affordable treatments across different sites of care. The healthcare team and P&T committee ensure the patient receives the most appropriate therapy while being conscious of health-system costs. The HSSP and procurement team ensure the patient can obtain and afford the medication. The implemented processes allows for direct communication and collaboration between different sites of care and this collaborative approach leads to optimal patient care.

Barriers to receipt of novel oral oncolytics: A single-institution quality improvement investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Novel oral oncolytic agents have become the standard of care and first-line therapies for many malignancies. However, issues impacting access to these drugs are not well explored. As part of a quality improvement project in a large tertiary academic institution, we aim to identify potential barriers that delay treatment for patients who are prescribed novel oral oncolytics. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of adults who were newly prescribed a novel oral oncolytic for Food and Drug Administration-approved indications at a single tertiary care center. Patients were identified via electronic prescription data (e-Scribe). Demographics, insurance information, and prescription dates were extracted from the electronic medical record and pharmacy claims data. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether time-to-receipt was associated with insurance category, pharmacy transfers, cost assistance, and drug prescribed. RESULTS: Of the 270 successfully filled prescriptions, the mean time-to-receipt was 7.3 ± 10.3 days (range: 0-109 days). Patients with Medicare experienced longer time-to-receipt (9.1 ± 13.1 days) compared to patients with commercial insurance (4.4 ± 3.3). Uninsured patients experienced the longest time-to-receipt (15.7 ± 7.8 days) overall. Pharmacy transfers and cost assistance programs were also significantly associated with longer time-to-receipt. Ten prescriptions remained unfilled 90 days after the study period and were considered abandoned. CONCLUSION: Insurance has a significant effect on the time-to-receipt of newly prescribed novel oral oncolytics. Pharmacy transfers and applying for cost assistance are also associated with longer wait times for patients. Our retrospective analysis identifies areas of improvement for future interventions to reduce wait times for patients receiving novel oral oncolytics.

Satisfaction and experiences of patients taking fingolimod and involved in a pharmacy-based patient support program in Switzerland - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is an oral multiple sclerosis drug that is considered a specialty drug due to its high cost and safety issues. The Fingolimod Patient Support Program (F-PSP) is a specialty pharmacy service developed to ensure the responsible use of fingolimod by promoting patient safety and medication adherence. This study aims to explore the satisfaction, experiences and perceptions regarding the F-PSP among patients currently involved in this program or recently withdrawn. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted via individual, face-to-face semistructured interviews with patients involved in the F-PSP. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analyzed via thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The main themes identified from the interviews (n = 17) were overall perception of the F-PSP, perception of the pharmacist-led consultations, perception of the tools (electronic monitor and drug intake graph), reasons to participate or potentially withdraw, and suggestions for improvements. Participants perceived the F-PSP as a reassuring support that complemented their medical care, providing a more human, personalized and person-centered approach than usual pharmacy care. Pharmacist-led consultations were valued for the medication-related and holistic support they provided. The importance of the pharmacist's attitude was emphasized. The electronic monitor was valued for promoting daily medication adherence and allowing the involvement of relatives, which reassured participants and their relatives. The participants appreciated the drug intake graph because it provided an objective overview of medication adherence, thereby reassuring, rewarding, and motivating them. The main reason to join the program was to be supported, especially with respect to medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were satisfied with the F-PSP, each for different reasons. Their feedback enabled the identification of measures for the optimization of the F-PSP and should facilitate its dissemination and transfer to other drugs/diseases/populations. Essential elements of generic pharmacist-led patient support programs considered valuable from the patients' perspective were identified.

Intensive Pharmacy Care Improves Outcomes of Hepatitis C Treatment in a Vulnerable Patient Population at a Safety-Net Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens has resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR). Treatment of vulnerable populations may be improved by incorporating an on-site intensive specialty pharmacy (ON-ISP). AIMS: To describe outcomes of HCV treatment at a safety-net hospital and proportion of subjects achieving SVR for those using the ON-ISP compared to an off-site pharmacy (OFF-SP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 219 subjects treated for HCV with DAA at Boston Medical Center was conducted. Subject characteristics, virologic response, and pharmacy services used were recorded. We used multivariable logistic regression to test the association between ON-ISP and SVR after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: SVR occurred in 71% of subjects by intention-to-treat (73% among ON-ISP users vs 57% among OFF-SP users) and 95% completing treatment per-protocol (96% among ON-ISP users vs 87% among OFF-SP users). Adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, insurance, fibrosis, prior treatment, and MELD revealed an increased likelihood of SVR among users of ON-ISP: OR 6.0 (95% CI 1.18-31.0). No significant difference in treatment delay or adverse events was seen among users of either pharmacy type. CONCLUSIONS: HCV treatment with DAA was well tolerated, but the rate of SVR was low (71%) compared to trials. This was due to loss to follow-up, as the per-protocol rate of SVR was much higher (95%). Use of ON-ISP was associated with an increase in SVR and may be valuable for improving care for vulnerable populations.

Impact of a specialty pharmacy case management service on adherence in patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents.

Background Patients receiving treatment with oral antineoplastic agents encounter several barriers to adherence, which may include high medication costs, limited access to specialty medications, severe adverse effects, complex medication regimens, and special handling precautions. Medication nonadherence not only reduces the efficacy of drug therapy but also has the potential to increase healthcare expenditures due to disease-related hospitalizations. Although several previous studies have examined patient adherence to oral antineoplastic agents, few have examined the impact of a specialty pharmacy case management service. Methods Patient adherence to oral antineoplastic agents was evaluated through a retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data and medical chart reviews. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to quantitatively measure adherence during two 6-month intervals, prior to and following the implementation of a case management service. Patients with an MPR greater than or equal to 0.8 were categorized as adherent, while those with an MPR less than 0.8 were categorized as non-adherent. Results During the first 6-month interval prior to implementation of the case management service (n = 40), a cumulative average MPR of 0.922 was observed. Following implementation of the case management service (n = 56), a non-statistically significant (p = 0.199) increase in MPR to 0.941 was identified. For patients categorized as non-adherent, a nonstatistically significant (p = 0.214) decrease from 15% to 7% was identified following the introduction of the case management service. Conclusion Study results from this retrospective review indicate that case management services provided through an outpatient specialty pharmacy may have the potential to improve patient adherence to oral antineoplastic agents.

Impact of an integrated oral chemotherapy program on patient adherence.

As the use of oral chemotherapy continues to rise, the issue of patient adherence is a concerning aspect of cancer treatment. In this concurrent prospective and retrospective study, we assessed oral chemotherapy adherence in patients receiving their prescriptions at an institutional specialty pharmacy, with an integrated oral chemotherapy program. The primary endpoint is medication possession ratio. Secondary endpoints include self-reported adherence comparing survey data before and after the introduction of the oral chemotherapy program to assess the impact of the comprehensive pharmacy services provided. Patients receiving their oral chemotherapy from the institutional specialty pharmacy have a mean medication possession ratio of 0.92, indicating excellent adherence rates. The oncology clinical pharmacist, in collaboration with the specialty pharmacy, has also decreased the rates of patient-reported non-adherence.

Evaluation of a Hepatitis C Patient Management Program at a University Specialty Pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: The University of Rochester (UR) Specialty Pharmacy hepatitis C patient management program offers a unique advantage of being integrated within the same health system as the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) Gastroenterology and Hepatology division. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess treatment success through the incidence of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) in patients served by the UR Specialty Pharmacy versus other nonintegrated pharmacies. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study in adult patients of URMC Gastroenterology and Hepatology prescribed hepatitis C treatment between January 1, 2014, and July 15, 2015. The incidence of SVR, adherence, delay in therapy initiation, early treatment discontinuation, rate of attainment of viral load measurement post-therapy completion, and predictors associated with treatment outcome were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 414 patients were prescribed hepatitis C virus treatment during the study period; 137 did not initiate therapy. The rate of SVR was 93% among patients at the UR Specialty Pharmacy and 89% at nonintegrated pharmacies ( P = 0.357). Adherence to therapy was 100% and 97% at the UR Specialty Pharmacy and nonintegrated pharmacies, respectively ( P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The UR Specialty Pharmacy was associated with a 93% SVR rate and significantly greater adherence compared with nonintegrated pharmacies. Larger studies are needed to determine if a significant difference in SVR exists between integrated and nonintegrated pharmacies. This study provides a framework for other institutions to justify developing integrated hepatitis C specialty pharmacy services and evaluate their success.

Impact of pharmacy channel on adherence to oral oncolytics.

BACKGROUND: Oral chemotherapy is increasingly prescribed to treat cancer. Despite its benefits, concerns have been raised regarding adherence to therapy. The study objective was to compare and measure adherence, persistence, and abandonment in patients filling prescriptions in traditional retail (TR) versus specialty pharmacy (SP) channels. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we selected newly treated patients aged ≥18 years with a prescription for erlotinib, capecitabine, or imatinib during 2007-2011 from a Medco population of both United States commercial and Medicare health plans. Patients were classified according to pharmacy channel providing the medication. Abandonment was defined as a reversal following initial approval of the index prescription claim with no additional paid claims for agent within 90 days of reversal. Patients were considered adherent if the proportion of days covered between the date of the first and last oral prescription was ≥80%. RESULTS: In our retrospective cohort, 11,972 filled their prescriptions within the SP channel, and 30,394 filled their prescriptions within the TR channels, respectively. The SP channel had the highest proportion of adherent patients compared with TR (71.6% vs. 56.4%, P < .001). Abandonment of the initial prescription was low with overall rates of only 1.7%. In multivariate models controlling for demographic characteristics, index oncolytic, days of supply, and copay, SP channel (relative to TR) was significantly associated with lower rates of abandonment and increased adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy channel may be influential on abandonment and adherence. Lower rates of abandonment and higher rates of adherence were observed among SP patients versus TR.

Evaluation of the impact of a health-system specialty pharmacy patient management program on achieving predefined clinical outcome measures.

PURPOSE: Specialty medications often have high costs, pose difficulties with payor approval, and require additional monitoring. Earlier articles have defined various examples of clinical outcome measures (COMs); however, goals and benchmarks have not been well defined, and a gap in the literature exists. This study evaluated the effectiveness of our health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) patient management program (PMP) in achieving predefined COM goals. METHODS: Disease state protocols were developed within the HSSP, and clinical and adherence goals were created for each COM based on primary literature. This retrospective, single-center review examined outcomes and adherence data on patients enrolled in the PMP during 2022. The primary outcome was the number of predefined disease state COM goals met. Secondary outcomes included the number of predefined adherence goals met and annual financial impact. RESULTS: Of 1,431 patients whose records were reviewed, 1,053 met criteria for inclusion. The primary outcome analysis showed that 85% (33 of 39) of the predefined disease state goals were met. Predefined adherence goals were met, with an average proportion of days covered (PDC) for all specialty medications of >90%. The PMP yielded $5,167,043 in direct patient cost savings and $167,260 in cost avoidance. CONCLUSION: The PMP yielded positive results in meeting goals set for the COMs in the disease states managed within the HSSP. COMs will remain a focus for HSSPs to help patients achieve desired clinical outcomes and HSSPs adhere to accreditation standards. More research in this field and standardization of COM goals may benefit the larger HSSP community.

Assessment of long-term medication adherence with cystic fibrosis: An integrated approach.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that creates a multisystem pathology resulting in complex treatment regimens. In 2014, 43% of people with CF at an academic medical center experienced medication acquisition barriers. The creation of an integrated specialty pharmacy with an embedded CF team pharmacist was launched in 2016. In addition to filling specialty medications, this specialty pharmacy filled all patient medications through a service called total care pharmacy (TCP). This service was hypothesized to positively impact medication adherence. METHODS: Adherence analysis was performed by utilizing the proportion of days covered (PDC). PDC was analyzed during years 1, 2, and 3 of therapy. PDC was calculated for medications with at least three fills during each year. Patients with PDC less than 80% were considered nonadherent and underwent manual chart review to identify a documented reason for nonadherence. RESULTS: Patients in the first year of dornase alfa therapy had significantly higher adherence in the TCP cohort compared to non-TCP (81.3% PDC vs. 66.0%; p = .006), which was largely driven by adult patients (73.3% vs. 56.5% for pediatric). Analysis of other medications and groups did not yield statistically significant differences. Many patients who had been classified as nonadherent had valid clinical reasons that explained gaps in therapy. CONCLUSIONS: When filling medications at a specialty pharmacy integrated within the academic medication center, dornase alfa adherence was higher in the TCP group. Further studies comparing TCP with services offered by pharmacies external to the health system would better characterize the impact of TCP services.

Health-system specialty pharmacy: Overview of a hybrid clinical model.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of specialty pharmacies has grown, especially within the hospital setting. These pharmacies have shown benefits in the areas of patient education and adherence, financial support, and patient and provider satisfaction. Currently, there are gaps in literature describing use of a hybrid clinical model in health-system specialty pharmacies. SUMMARY: The UofL Health - UofL Hospital Specialty Pharmacy (UofL Health SP) is attached to a retail pharmacy in a larger health system. Pharmacists in the UofL Health SP utilize a hybrid clinical model in which they split their time between working in a specialty clinic and staffing in the specialty pharmacy. The specialty pharmacy and its oncology satellite pharmacy each have a primary staffing pharmacist, and 5 other pharmacists participate in this hybrid clinical model. In addition to the specialty pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and patient care advocates support the operations of the specialty pharmacy and ensure financial access to medications for patients. CONCLUSION: With the hybrid clinical model at UofL Health SP, there is increased workflow efficiency and better communication between specialty clinics and the specialty pharmacy, which results in a streamlined patient experience. Additionally, there has been an increase in specialty pharmacy prescriptions dispensed in the specialty pharmacy since the implementation of this hybrid clinical model.

Provision of ambrisentan from a health-system specialty pharmacy affiliated with a pulmonary hypertension Center of Comprehensive Care.

PURPOSE: This descriptive report describes the process used to obtain access to providing ambrisentan from a health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) affiliated with a pulmonary hypertension Center of Comprehensive Care, develop a pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) care team at the HSSP, and characterize medication adherence and access metrics. SUMMARY: PAH is a rare disease treated with several specialty medications requiring intensive monitoring. Historically, specialty medications used to treat PAH have been provided by only select specialty pharmacies due to restricted drug distribution channels. It is recommended that patients with PAH receive their care at centers with expertise in the diagnosis and management of this disorder, but the HSSPs at these expert centers are unable to provide specialty PAH medications. The current care model for PAH leads to patients receiving their medical and pharmaceutical care from separate entities. This descriptive report describes a multidisciplinary team's approach to gaining access to providing ambrisentan and developing a disease state care team within an established HSSP. After implementing this service, specialty pharmacy metrics were assessed, including proportion of days covered (PDC), time to first fill, patient contact rate, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program compliance, time to prior authorization (PA) approval, rate of optimal adherence (PDC of >80%), and PA renewal rate, to demonstrate a proof-of-concept HSSP model for PAH. In this model, the HSSP was able to demonstrate high-quality specialty pharmacy metrics with regard to medication adherence, medication access, and REMS program compliance. CONCLUSION: The development of a PAH care team to provide ambrisentan at an existing HSSP was associated with high adherence rates, efficient and reliable medication access, and REMS program compliance.

Compass Rose™ Implementation in a Large Academic Medical Center.

Background: Compass Rose™, a case management tool developed by Epic®, was designed to track various patient coordination tasks, outreaches, and outcomes. This report describes the implementation of Compass Rose™ within an internal health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) and changes in care coordination metrics before and after implementation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to discuss the implementation of Compass Rose™. Objectives: The goals of this study were to describe the implementation process of Compass Rose™ at an internal HSSP and compare staff satisfaction before and after Compass Rose™ as the primary outcome. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board exempt, retrospective cohort study conducted between June 2022 to December 2022 that assessed staff satisfaction, refill documentation time, prescription turnaround time, and patient satisfaction pre- and post- Compass Rose™ implementation through survey administration, observed time studies, and internal data reports. The process of Compass Rose™ implementation was also described and discussed. Results: 24 specialty pharmacy staff members participated in the Compass Rose™ implementation survey. No statistically significant differences were observed in either staff satisfaction (3.96 ± 0.95 versus 3.70 ± 0.69, p = 0.29) or predicted versus actual challenge of implementation (3.67 ± 1.17 versus 3.09 ± 0.96, p = 0.064). There was no significant difference in refill documentation time pre- versus post- Compass Rose™ implementation (4.22 ± 3.15 minutes versus 4.10 ± 2.36 minutes, p = 0.82); however, there was a statistically significant increase in prescription turnaround time post implementation (2.59 ± 2.85 days versus 2.69 ± 2.35 days, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Compass Rose™ implementation had no significant impact on staff satisfaction, patient satisfaction, or overall refill documentation time. Prescription turnaround time increased, which could be due to significant workflow changes with Compass Rose™ or several other contributing factors such as increased prescription volume and training new staff during this period.Benefits of Compass Rose™ included standardization of workflow, ability to quantify staff performance and clinical impact, and increased transparency regarding care provided by the specialty pharmacy team.

From transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis diagnosis to tafamidis treatment: Association of drop-off with patient sociodemographic characteristics.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Compared to estimated population prevalence rates, relatively few patients at risk are diagnosed with and treated for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA). Where along the clinical pathway patient drop-off occurs, as well as the association of drop-off with patient sociodemographic characteristics, remains unknown. METHODS: Using data from a healthcare system-wide cardiovascular imaging repository and specialty pharmacy, we characterized the clinical pathway from diagnosis with pyrophosphate scintigraphy (PYP) to tafamidis prescription, initiation, and adherence. Standardized differences (d values of ≥0.20, indicating at least a small effect size) were used to compare sociodemographics (age, sex, race, Area Deprivation Index) among patients with PYP-identified ATTR-CA by tafamidis prescription status and among patients prescribed tafamidis by initiation status. Tafamidis adherence was measured with the proportion of days covered (PDC). RESULTS: Of 97 patients with ATTR-CA, 58.8% were prescribed tafamidis, with 80.7% of those initiating therapy. Patients with ATTR-CA prescribed tafamidis were younger than those not prescribed tafamidis (d = -0.30). Utilization of a specialty pharmacy resulted in enrichment of treatment in subgroups traditionally undertreated in cardiovascular medicine, with higher rates of tafamidis initiation among women (100% initiation), patients of Black/African American race (d = 0.40), and those living in more economically disadvantaged areas (d ≥ 0.30). Adherence was high (PDC of >80%) in 88.4% of those initiating tafamidis. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the tremendous opportunity for more robust ATTR-CA clinical programs, identifying potential patient subgroups that should be targeted to reduce disparities. For patients diagnosed with ATTR-CA, utilization of a specialty pharmacy process appears to ensure equitable provision of tafamidis therapy.

Impact of pharmacist-driven referral to increase specialty pharmacy prescription capture.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of a clinical pharmacy specialist (CPS) embedded within a rheumatology clinic at a large academic medical center on the prescription capture rate at the health-system specialty pharmacy. METHODS: Initially low prescription capture rates for the health-system specialty pharmacy led to the integration of a CPS in the main campus rheumatology clinic. Benchmarking was completed by assessing the prior prescription capture rate using electronic medical record analytics and Loopback Analytics (a database of prescription capture for the health-system specialty pharmacy). The existing workflows for both the rheumatology clinic and specialty pharmacy were observed with regard to biologic medication ordering and processing. Strategies for an updated workflow for biologic ordering with the incorporation of an embedded CPS in the rheumatology clinic were designed. This new workflow was established with key stakeholders, including the CPS, rheumatology providers, clinic staff, and pharmacy technicians. Once the workflow was established, all parties were educated and updated, including rheumatology providers, nursing staff, and specialty pharmacy staff. Prescription capture rate was monitored on a monthly basis. RESULTS: Prescription capture increased from 13.16% before pharmacist implementation (October to December 2021) to 35.42% after pharmacist implementation (October to December 2022) (P = 0.019). During the same periods, the revenue generated increased from $43,222.89 to $135,198.70 (P = 0.224) and the proportion of prescriptions initially sent to the health-system specialty pharmacy compared to other specialty pharmacies increased from 37% to 79% (P < 0.001) with CPS implementation. CONCLUSION: Expansion and implementation of pharmacy services by integrating a CPS in a rheumatology ambulatory clinic increased prescription capture and pharmacy revenue while optimizing patient care. We hope to expand similar CPS services to other clinics within the health system.