Adjustment of Stent Retriever Length to Clot Extent Affects First-Pass Reperfusion in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Stent retriever technology has evolved, and significantly longer devices have become available for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of large cerebral vessel occlusions in ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that increased stent retriever length may improve the rate of complete angiographic reperfusion and decrease the respective number of attempts, resulting in a better clinical outcome. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior and posterior circulation treated with stent retriever MT. The study group was dichotomized into short (20 mm) and long (>20 mm) retrievers using propensity matching. In the anterior circulation, the clot burden score was evaluated. Primary end points were first-pass modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 3 reperfusion and first-pass mTICI ≥ 2b reperfusion, and the secondary end point was functional independence (defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at discharge and 90 days. RESULTS: Overall, 394 patients were included in the analysis. In the anterior circulation, short stent retrievers had a significantly higher rate of first-pass reperfusion in cases with low clot burden (mTICI 3: 27% vs. 17%; p = 0.009; mTICI ≥ 2b: 42 vs. 30%; p = 0.005) and in middle cerebral artery occlusions (mTICI ≥ 2b: 51 vs. 41%; p = 0.024). Higher rates of favorable outcome at discharge and 90 days were observed for the short stent retriever group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stent retriever length should be adjusted to clot burden score and vessel occlusion site.

Stent-retriever thrombectomy in the treatment of infants with acute thrombosis of the superior vena cava and innominate vein.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the efficacy and safety of stent-retriever thrombectomy in infants with thrombosis of the superior vena cava (SVC) and innominate vein. BACKGROUND: Thrombosis of the SVC and of the innominate vein is a potentially life threatening complication in infants during intensive care treatment following major surgical procedures. To avoid reoperations, we evaluated interventional revascularization by stent-retriever thrombectomy. METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, five infants were diagnosed with acute thrombosis of the SVC and innominate vein following major cardiac or pediatric surgery. Using a femoral venous access and 4 or 5 French guiding catheters stent-retriever systems (4/20 mm or 6/30 mm) were placed into the thrombus and retrieved under suction. We aimed to revascularize not only the SVC but also the innominate, jugular, and subclavian veins. RESULTS: Following repeated stent retrieving manoeuvers, we were able to reestablish flow in the major veins of all patients. Due to significant residual thrombotic material, we decided to perform additional balloon dilatation of the SVC and innominate vein in 3/5 patients. There were no complications related to the procedure and none of our patients required blood transfusion. Following the intervention, the patients received treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin. Interventional treatment achieved persistent patency of the SVC and innominate vein in all patients. CONCLUSION: Stent-retriever thrombectomy is a safe and effective method for interventional treatment of acute thrombosis of the central veins in infants. Due to the large amount of thrombotic material, it is frequently required to combine this method with balloon compression of residual thrombotic material.

High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Intracranial Vessel Wall Inflammation Following Endovascular Thrombectomy.

Intracranial high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging evidence of vessel wall inflammation is present following stent retriever manipulation but absent following aspiration thrombectomy. This is presented in a case of rotatory vertebral artery compression causing multiple posterior circulation infarctions requiring multiple separate aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomies.

Endovascular treatment of embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion stroke: ADAPT versus stent retriever thrombectomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) technique in embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion (EMB-ABAO). METHODS: We collected data from patients with EMB-ABAO in multiple stroke centers from January 2017 to February 2024. We defined two groups of enrolled patients, the ADAPT group and the SRT group. The primary outcome was the first attempt recanalization (FAR) rate. Secondary outcomes were the puncture to recanalization (PTR) time and the 90-day favorable functional outcome. The safety outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients were screened for endovascular treatment (EVT) of ABAO ischemic stroke, and 108 patients were identified with EMB-ABAO stroke. Among these, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 58 (60.42%) were in the ADAPT group, and 38 (39.58%) were in the SRT group. Compared with the SRT group, the ADAPT group achieved FAR more frequently (60.34% versus 39.47%; p = 0.045) and a higher 90-day favorable functional outcome rate (44.83% versus 36.84%; p = 0.438). The median PTR time of the ADAPT group was significantly shorter than that of the SRT group (42 versus 105 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In cases where EMB-ABAO is suspected, ADAPT was superior to SRT in terms of FAR rate and PTR time, but the 90-day mRS scores had no statistical significance. Given the reduced time to recanalization with ADAPT, an initial attempt at recanalization with ADAPT may be necessary before stent retriever. However, due to the study limitations, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require further study.

Comparison of a direct aspiration first pass technique vs. stent retriever thrombectomy for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke in the anterior circulation with atrial fibrillation.

Objectives: The stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) and a direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) are the two main mechanical thrombectomy (MT) techniques for acute ischemic stroke. Few data are available for comparing the therapeutic effects associated with the two mechanical thrombectomy techniques in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both techniques for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke in the anterior circulation with atrial fibrillation. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022 who received mechanical thrombectomy by either SRT or ADAPT. Comparisons were made with regards to the initial traits, course of therapy, effectiveness indicators, and complications of these individuals. The primary outcome is recanalization rate. Results: In this study, after screening 431 patients, 92 eligible patients, with 48 patients received SRT and 44 patients received ADAPT, were included. There was no significant difference in the recanalization rate between the two groups (SRT 87.5% vs. ADAPT 84.1%, P = 0.639). Compared with SRT, patients in ADAPT group had a shorter puncture to recanalization time [33.5 min (27.0-59.5) vs. 50.5 min (31.5-91.5), P = 0.009], a higher first pass success recanalization rate (54.5 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.040), and a higher rate of patients with improvement of NIHSS scores ≥4 at discharge (84.1 vs. 56.3%, P = 0.004). However, distal embolization occurred more frequently in the ADAPT group than that in SRT group (50.0 vs. 22.9%, P = 0.007). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the 3-month mRS score, symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, or mortality. Conclusions: Compared with SRT, ADAPT has similar recanalization rate for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke in the anterior circulation with atrial fibrillation. However, ADAPT might be more effective in terms of shorter puncture to recanalization time and higher first pass success recanalization rate. Further studies are needed for confirming our results.

Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as a first-line approach for cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke in large vessels of the anterior circulation.

Subject: This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approaches for anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke. Method: This retrospective observational study included patients with anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Patients were grouped according to the first-line approach they received: aspiration thrombectomy or stent retriever thrombectomy. The primary outcome measure was the change in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from preoperative to immediate postoperative and from preoperative to discharge. Secondary indicators included the rate of favorable prognosis at discharge [Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2], successful vessel recanalization rate [modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score ≥ 2b], time from successful femoral artery puncture to successful vessel recanalization, and perioperative complications. Result: The study included 127 cases, with 1 case withdrawal after enrollment due to a stroke of another determined cause, with 83 in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 43 cases in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The change in NIHSS score from preoperative to immediate postoperative was 5 (1, 8) in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 1 (0, 4.5) in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The change from preoperative to discharge was 8 (5, 12) in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 4 (0, 9) in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The aspiration thrombectomy group exhibited significantly better prognosis rates and shorter time from successful femoral artery puncture to successful vessel recanalization. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of successful vessel recanalization rates and perioperative complications. Conclusion: As a first-line approach for anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke, aspiration thrombectomy leads to better improvement in neurological functional deficits and prognosis rates compared to stent retriever thrombectomy.

Safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Although aspiration thrombectomy has shown comparable safety and efficacy to stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), the use of aspiration thrombectomy as first-line endovascular treatment for AIS remains controversial. Aim: To perform a systematic evaluation of the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy in the treatment of AIS. Material and methods: We searched the online databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SinoMed to collect randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies concerning the treatment of AIS with aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy. Primary outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, a 90-day mRS scores of 0-2, intracranial haemorrhage, and successful recanalization rate. The Jadad scale and the MINORS evaluation items were used to evaluate study quality, and RevMan 5.2 was used to conduct a meta-analysis. Any differential effects in rates between the two strategies were assessed using a random effect model. Results: A total of 15 articles were found, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 13 retrospective studies. It showed that aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy had similar results in terms of 90-day all-cause mortality (p = 0.88), 90-day mRS scores 0-2 (p = 0.29), and intracranial haemorrhage (p = 0.47). And in terms of successful recanalization rates, the aspiration thrombectomy group had better outcomes than the stent retriever thrombectomy group (p = 0.0003). The heterogeneity of 90-day all-cause mortality (I2 = 0%), 90-day mRS scores of 0-2 (I2 = 6%), intracranial haemorrhage (I2 = 21%), and successful recanalization rate (I2 = 0%) were less than 30%. Conclusions: Both aspiration thrombectomy and stent thrombectomy can be used as the first line of intravascular treatment for AIS.

Intravenous Alteplase is Associated with First Pass Effect in Stent-retriever but not ADAPT Thrombectomy : Post Hoc Analysis of the SKIP Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of alteplase, either combined with stent-retriever thrombectomy or a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT), in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke. METHODS: This was a retrospective post hoc analysis of data from The Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute LVO Stroke (SKIP) study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the first-line thrombectomy technique: stent-retriever and ADAPT. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, namely MT and MT + alteplase. The procedural outcomes, such as first pass effect (FPE) ratio and number of passes, were evaluated. The clinical outcomes included mRS score at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were included (116 in the stent-retriever group and 64 in the ADAPT group). No interaction was detected between the first-line technique and alteplase administration. In the stent-retriever group, after adjusting for factors associated with FPE, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of FPE of the MT + alteplase subgroup versus the MT subgroup was 3.57 (1.5-8.48) and in the ADAPT group it was 1.35 (0.37-4.91). With alteplase, the number of passes decreased with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 (0.37-0.93) in the stent-retriever group but not in the ADAPT group. In both first-line technique groups, clinical outcomes did not differ between subgroups. CONCLUSION: In the SKIP study, alteplase administration was associated with increased FPE when combined with stent-retriever thrombectomy, but not with ADAPT. We found no differences in the clinical outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Angioplasty in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Atherosclerosis.

Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is one of the promising treatment options in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD)-related basilar artery occlusion (BAO). In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of direct angioplasty (DA) with stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) with or without rescue treatment in ICAD-related BAO. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 187 patients who underwent EVT for BAO from January 2012 to July 2018. We identified patients who underwent EVT due to ICAD-related BAO. Patients who accepted SRT with or without rescue treatment were classified into the SRT group. Patients treated with DA with or without stent placement were classified into DA group. Clinical and laboratory findings and outcomes were compared between groups. Results: A total of 108 patients were enrolled, among them 77 underwent SRT and 31 underwent DA; 61 (79.2%) SRT group patients underwent angioplasty with or without stent placement. Compared with patients in the SRT group, those in the DA group experienced a significantly shorter procedure time [60 min (60-120 min) vs. 120 min (60-120 min); p = 0.038] and a lower number of device passes [2 passes (1-2 passes) vs. 3 passes (2-4 passes); p < 0.001]. No significant differences in balloon angioplasty (35.5 vs. 22.1%; p = 0.150), emergent stent placement (64.5 vs. 57.1%; p = 0.481), successful recanalization (93.5 vs. 85.7%; p = 0.340), embolization in distal or new territory (3.2 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.314), and reocclusion (22.6 vs. 9.1%; p = 0.109) among DA and SRT groups were found. Additionally, no differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage incidence [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.74; 95% CI, 0.06-9.44; p = 0.815], functional independence (adjusted OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.50-4.16; p = 0.497), and mortality rate (adjusted OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.06-2.04; p = 0.247) were noted among groups. Conclusions: In certain patients with ICAD-related BAO, DA may shorten procedure time and reduce required device passes compared to SRT. In this study, DA was retrospectively found to be of similar safety and efficacy as SRT.

Evaluation of challenges and limitations of mechanical thrombectomy using 3D printed neurovascular phantoms.

The mechanical thrombectomy (MT) efficacy, for large vessel occlusion (LVO) treatment in patients with stroke, could be improved if better teaching and practicing surgical tools were available. We propose a novel approach that uses 3D printing (3DP) to generate patient anatomical vascular variants for simulation of diverse clinical scenarios of LVO treated with MT. 3DP phantoms were connected to a flow loop with physiologically relevant flow conditions, including input flow rate and fluid temperature. A simulated blood clot was introduced into the model and placed in the Middle Cerebral Artery region. Clot location, composition (hard or soft clot), length, and arterial angulation were varied and MTs were simulated using stent retrievers. Device placement relative to the clot and the outcome of the thrombectomy were recorded for each situation. Angiograms were captured before and after LVO simulation and after the MT. Recanalization outcome was evaluated using the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale. Forty-two 3DP neurovascular phantom benchtop experiments were performed. Clot mechanical properties, hard versus soft, had the highest impact on the MT outcome, with 18/42 proving to be successful with full or partial clot retrieval. Other factors such as device manufacturer and the tortuosity of the 3DP model correlated weakly with the MT outcome. We demonstrated that 3DP can become a comprehensive tool for teaching and practicing various surgical procedures for MT in LVO patients. This platform can help vascular surgeons understand the endovascular devices limitations and patient vascular geometry challenges, to allow surgical approach optimization.

Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Alone for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods We queried online databases for original studies comparing aspiration thrombectomy with stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with AIS. After article selection, data were extracted on multiple baseline characteristics and prespecified endpoints. Dichotomous data were presented as risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs); continuous data as mean differences and 95% CIs. The data were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study type, site of occlusion, and age. Results We shortlisted nine relevant studies (n=1453 patients; n=690 receiving aspiration thrombectomy and n=763 receiving stent retriever thrombectomy). Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups in the rates of successful recanalization (RR: 0.96 [0.87, 1.06]; p=0.42), excellent functional outcome (RR: 0.90 [0.80, 1.01]; p=0.06), or procedure time (weighted mean difference (WMD): -5.39 minutes [-11.81, 1.04]; p=0.10). However, when removing the study by Nishi et al., sensitivity analysis resulted in a significant reduction in procedure time with aspiration (WMD: -11.01 [-15.54, -6.49]; p<0.0001). No significant difference was observed in safety outcomes, including all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82 [0.57, 1.19]; p=0.30), intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.93 [0.55, 1.59]; p=0.80), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.72[0.42, 1.21]; p=0.57), or embolization to new territory (RR: 0.71 [0.42, 1.19]; p=0.19). Subgroup analysis revealed that aspiration thrombectomy led to significantly better outcomes in patients with a mean age ≤65 (RR: 1.15 [1.03, 1.29]; p=0.001), and stent retriever thrombectomy led to increased recanalization success in patients with a mean age >65 (RR: 0.89 [0.80, 1.00]; p=0.05). Conclusions Our updated meta-analysis reveals that both aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy are comparably effective in the management of AIS. Shorter procedure times may potentially be attained with aspiration thrombectomy, and outcomes with each procedure may be age-dependent.

Factors Promoting Futile Recanalization After Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Stroke Affecting the Anterior Circulation: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors associated with futile recanalization after stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 56 patients with an acute anterior circulation macrovascular occlusion who underwent successful stent retriever thrombectomy. Patients were classified as successful recanalization or futile recanalization at the follow-up. Univariate analysis and binary logic regression analysis were used to explore the association between patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and futile recanalization. RESULTS: The rate of futile recanalization was significantly higher after stent retrieval thrombectomy in patients with an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score ≤7 points versus >7 points (P < 0.001), ≥5 passes with the stent retriever versus <5 passes with the stent retriever (P = 0.036), or a longer recanalization time (P = 0.008). The influence of number of stent retriever pass is foremost, followed by ASPECT and occurrence to recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Improving technical expertise with mechanical thrombectomy and shortening the therapeutic time window may improve the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion.

Intracranial Rescue Stent Angioplasty After Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy : Multicenter Experience.

PURPOSE: Stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) for acute intracranial large artery occlusion (LAO) may not result in permanent recanalization in rare cases, e.g. due to an underlying stenosis or dissection. In this specific patient group, rescue stent angioplasty (RSA) may be the only treatment option to achieve permanent vessel patency and potentially a good clinical outcome. To date, the experience with RSA is limited. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, interventional and clinical data of patients with acute intracranial LAO of the anterior and posterior circulation who underwent RSA after SRT due to an underlying lesion between 2012-2017 in four neurovascular centers were studied. RESULTS: In this study 34 patients (mean age 67 years) were included whereby 18 patients had anterior circulation LAO and 16 patients posterior circulation LAO. The SRT maneuver count ranged between 1 and 15 (median 2). Indications for RSA were an immediate re-occlusion in 25 (74%), and a persistent high-grade stenosis in 9 patients (26%). The RSA was technically feasible in 33 patients (97%). A mTICI 2b/3 result was obtained in 26 patients (76%). Median onset-to-recanalization time was 248 min (range 80-650 min). After 3 months 10/34 patients (29%) had a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0-2). In detail, 4/18 patients (22%) with anterior circulation LAO and 6/16 patients (38%) with posterior circulation LAO were functionally independent. CONCLUSION: The use of RSA can be considered for acute intracranial LAO in cases with immediate re-occlusion or high-grade stenosis after SRT alone.

Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retriever and Balloon-Guiding Catheter.

PURPOSE: Intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke has developed rapidly in recent years. Due to proven efficacy in randomized trials, stent retrievers were replacing first-generation thrombectomy devices and have been defined as method of choice. However, aspiration catheters or a combination of several techniques have shown promising rates of successful recanalizations. To create a basis for comparison of the new approaches according to real-world data, we determined the first pass recanalization rate of an evidence-based standard technique with the use of a stent retriever in combination with a balloon-guiding catheter. The assessment was based on the number of required passages and reperfusion rate, but not on clinical results. METHODS: Patients from our institution with anterior circulation occlusions and mechanical thrombectomy by using stent retrievers in combination with balloon-guiding catheters were analyzed retrospectively. Reperfusion was graded with the "thrombolysis in cerebral infarction" (TICI) classification on post-interventional angiograms. Additionally, the number of passes and the duration of the recanalization procedure were recorded. RESULTS: Between 2014 and July 2017, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria. Successful recanalization, defined as a TICI scale 2b/3, was 91% (TICI 2b was achieved in 44% and TICI 3 in 47%) after the procedure. After the first passage, successful recanalization was achieved in 65% of the patients. Mean number of passes was 1.4 (1-5 passes) for all patients. Median duration of the procedure was 49 min (0:11-2:35 h). CONCLUSIONS: Even a standard thrombectomy technique with the use of a stent retriever together with a balloon-guiding catheter provides reasonable recanalization rates with only one passage. The results can be taken as benchmark for alternative and more complex techniques.

Endovascular Stroke Therapy Focused on Stent Retriever Thrombectomy and Direct Clot Aspiration: Historical Review and Modern Application.

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator had been the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke since its approval in 1995. However, the restrictive time window, numerous contraindications, and its low recanalization rate were all limitations of this modality. Under those circumstances, endovascular stroke therapy went through a great evolution during the past two decades of intravenous thrombolysis. The results of the 2013 randomized trials for endovascular stroke therapy were neutral, although they were limited by insufficient imaging screening at enrollment, early-generation devices with less efficacy, and treatment delays. Huge progress was made in 2015, as there were five randomized clinical trials which all demonstrated the safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment. Despite differences in detail patient enrollment criteria, all 5 trials employed key factors for good functional recovery; (1) screening with non-invasive imaging to identify the proximal occlusion and exclude a large infarct core, (2) using highly effective modern thrombectomy devices mainly with stent retriever, and (3) establishment of a fast workflow to achieve effective reperfusion. The results of those trials indicate that modern thrombectomy devices can allow for faster and more effective reperfusion, which can lead to improved clinical outcomes compared to intravenous thrombolysis alone. These advances in mechanical thrombectomy are promising in the global fight against ischemic stroke-related disability and mortality. Two current mainstreams among such mechanical thrombectomy techniques, "stent retriever thrombectomy" and "direct clot aspiration", are the topic of this review. Stent retriever thrombectomy using Solitaire and Trevo retriever will be firstly discussed. And, the commonalities and the differences between two major clot aspiration thrombectomy techniques; a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) and forced arterial suction thrombectomy (FAST), will be additionally explained. Finally, details regarding the combination of direct clot aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy, the switching strategy and the Solumbra technique, will be described.